Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 89627

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : ER01 - ER05 Full Version

An Insight into Maternal Deaths: A Retrospective Analysis and Pathologists Perspective in Series of 16 Autopsy Cases


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55337.16554
Vaishali A Walke, Sonali Datar, Anjali Dhote, Amrapali Gaikwad, Aishwarya Toshniwal, Balwant Kowe

1. Professor, Department of Pathology and Lab Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 5. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. 6. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Indira Gandhi Government Medical College and Hospital, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Vaishali A Walke,
65C, Shree Gajanan Apartment, Gajanan Nagar, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drvaishaliw@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Maternal mortality continues to be of great concern with most maternal deaths occurring in developing countries which accounts for about one in 180 deaths during childbirth as compared to 1 in 4,900 in developed nations.

Aim: To determine the common causes of maternal deaths and to study their clinicopathological profile.

Materials and Methods: The present study included series of 16 cases of maternal deaths from January 2018 to June 2020. The study was conducted at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India. The post mortem examination in all these deaths was conducted as per institutional policy. The external, in-situ examination along with histological findings are studied in each case.

Results: The study group comprised of 16 cases, in the range of 21 to 37 years with a mean age of 27 years. Seven deaths antepartum, 2 intrapartum while seven postpartum period and all the deliveries took place in hospital. Amongst these 16 deaths, 11 were brought dead while in rest five, deaths were hospital based.

Conclusion: The autopsy provides an invaluable information and insights about pathophysiological changes and sequence of events leading to death. Usefulness of relevant clinical data in complementing the diagnosis cannot be overemphasized. Their in-depth analysis can certainly help to prevent future maternal deaths and also in early picking up of complications; which further can avoid this preventable and inevitable loss and reduces the national burden on maternal mortality

Keywords

Maternal mortality, Postpartum haemorrhage, Obstetric complications

Maternal mortality as per the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Health-related problems (ICD-10) is defined as a death occurring during pregnancy or within 42 days of childbirth or an abortion related or aggravated by pregnancy or its management but is not from accidental or incidental causes (1). The deaths that occur during 43rd day to 1 year of childbirth are termed as late deaths. Maternal deaths are further classified into direct, indirect and fortuitous deaths (1). The autopsy providesvaluable information and insights about pathophysiological changes in various organs which are important in delineation of the sequence of events leading to death. However, without accompanying relevant clinical data, its utility cannot be over emphasized (2). If no macroscopic cause of death can be identified, then the histopathological examination can add on to arrive at a definitive diagnosis. The current study is carried out to determine the possible causes of maternal deaths and to study their clinicopathological profile.

Material and Methods

This observational, retrospective study was conducted on a series of total 16 maternal deaths, at Indira Gandhi Medical College, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India, during the period from January 2018 to June 2020 were included in the study.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The inclusion criteria consist of willingness to give consent for performing autopsy and brought dead cases or referrals or hospital admissions as per definition of maternal deaths were included. While deaths not fulfilling the criteria of maternal deaths or cases in which consent was not possible were excluded from the study.

Data collection: In each case, the detailed clinical information such as age, parity, history of any systemic illness, previous obstetric history, antenatal check-up visits, nature and method of delivery, postpartum period of hospital stay, treatment received were procured from the deceased’s records and from relatives at the time of autopsy. The autopsy protocol followed was that for routine clinico-pathological autopsies, however, specific findings meticulously examined were frothy bubbles in right atrium, acute fatty liver of pregnancy or evidence of pulmonary or amniotic fluid embolism.

Procedure

In each case, external as well as in-situ examination with dissection and preservation of the visceral organs was done in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Blood culture and culture of other tissue specimens was performed as per indication. A detailed gross examination of all the organs and histopathology of at least one representative section from each organ such as brain with meninges, heart, liver, spleen, kidney, pituitary and adrenal glands was carried out. Additional sections were also examined from lungs in an attempt to identify pulmonary emboli and also from grossly abnormal areas when required. Tissues from placenta and uterus were also studied whenever indicated. Paraffin sections then stained with routine Haematoxylin and Eosin; along with special stains like Ziehl Nielsen, Periodic Acid Schiff whenever applicable.

The autopsy findings were correlated with detailed clinical information and investigation in each case to establish the accurate cause of death. No statistical tests were applied as the study includes a small series maternal death.

Results

The study group comprised of 16 cases, in the range of 21 to 37 years with a mean age of 27 years. Seven deaths were in antepartum, seven in postpartum while 2 in intrapartum period and all the deliveries took place in hospital Amongst these 16 deaths, 11 were brought dead while, in rest five deaths were hospital based. Out of 11, death occurred during transfer to the hospital in 10, while in one it occurred at home. Eleven mothers were primigravida, four gravida 2 and one was gravida 6. All 16 cases data are presented in (Table/Fig 1). The mode of delivery was normal in five while it was by caesarean section in two cases, amongst total seven deaths that took place in postpartum period. Out of seven postpartum deaths, two occurred within 48 hours, three within first six days, and one each on day 13th and 15th of delivery. Nine mothers died due to direct causes, Postpartum Haemorrhage (PPH) (25%) being major cause of deaths followed by puerperal sepsis (Table/Fig 2).

The maternal deaths that occurred due to PPH, were primigravida and had history of normal vaginal delivery. On examination, they revealed conjunctival pallor and all visceral organs were grossly pale. There was no evidence of cervical/vaginal tear. The lungs on histology, in first 2 cases of PPH displayed features of Chronic Passive Venous Congestion (CPVC). In another two cases, the significant finding was acute tubular necrosis of kidney. There were two cases each of puerperal sepsis and of preeclampsia/ eclampsia. One patient amongst two cases of puerperal sepsis died on day 6th of child birth while other during 8th month of gestation. In both cases, all organs were found to be congested on gross examination. The significant finding on histology was chronic passive venous congestion of liver and multiple foci of haemorrhage in lung in case one, while all visceral organs were congested, and lung showed features of interstitial pneumonia in other case. Out of two eclampsia cases, one died during 28 weeks of gestation, who revealed subdural and subarachnoid haemorrhages, multiple petechial haemorrhage in liver, while rest all visceral organs were congested.

On histology, significant findings were, chronic passive venous congestion in lungs, fatty change in liver, multiple foci of haemorrhages in spleen and acute tubular necrosis of kidney. Other patient was brought dead, she had bilateral pedal oedema with minimal labial oedema and bilateral pleural effusion; the histology showed marked pulmonary oedema. One case of disseminated intravascular coagulation, was P2L2 post Lower Segment Cesarian Section (LSCS) death, had haemorrhagic pleural and peritoneal effusion, multiple petechiae spots all over visceral organs. The uterine cavity also contained around 50 cc blood and blood clot. The renal parenchyma revealed foci ischaemic necrosis and presence of fibrin thrombi in blood vessels (Table/Fig 3)a,b. Lungs showed pulmonary oedema and fibrin thrombi in its microvasculature The cerebrum and cerebellum displayed marked congestion and presence of subarachnoid haemorrhage that was extending into the ventricles (Table/Fig 3)c,d. In the group of indirect causes, a young 26 weeks primigravida admitted with jaundice. Her serological markers for HEV infection were positive. Physical examination revealed yellowish discolouration of scalp and conjunctiva. Microscopy displayed extensive, pan-acinar necrosis with collapse of architectural framework (Table/Fig 4)a. There was also evidence of intrahepatic cholestasis and periportal mononuclear inflammation in surrounding viable areas (Table/Fig 4)b. These features were consistent with diagnosis of fulminant hepatitis.

Another case was of a 37-year G2P1L1 with 28 weeks of gestation. The significant findings on in-situ examination revealed heavy and firm lungs while liver was pale and grossly enlarged. Histology of lung revealed features of lobar pneumonia.

A 24-year-old primigravida-24 weeks gestation was a known case of sickle cell anaemia. Her in-situ and gross examination showed marked congestion of visceral organs such as liver, brain, lung and spleen. On histology, spleen revealed marked congestion, the sinuses are dilatedand engorged with plenty of sickled Red Blood Cells (RBC) (Table/Fig 5)a. The splenic parenchyma also shows yellowish brown to black, refractile sidero-fibrocalcific nodules called Gandy-Gamna Bodies (Table/Fig 5)b There was also evidence of marked pulmonary oedema and the blood vessels were packed with sickled RBCs(Table/Fig 5)c. The uterus and fallopian tube also displayed marked congestion (Table/Fig 5)d. The placenta showed marked congestion and the intervillous maternal spaces show numerous sicked RBCs.

Another primigravida, of 24 weeks of gestation brought dead to hospital for postmortem examination. Her in-situ examination revealed bilateral, multiple, greyish white, firm patches of consolidation. Microscopic examination from lung, spleen and liver showed numerous caseating granulomas, diagnostic of tuberculosis (Table/Fig 6). The Zeil Neilson Stain was positive for acid fast bacilli.

Another maternal death was a gravida six, patient died within few hours of delivery by caesarean section. She was a referral case, brought dead with a diagnosis of status epilepticus with anaemia. Significant findings on in-situ examination were bilateral pleural adhesions and effusion while the cranial cavity and brain was unremarkable. The lung revealed features of chronic passive venous congestion.

A primigravida, was admitted on day 13th of postpartum period, with diagnosis as viral meningoencephalitis. In-situ examination revealed purulent exudate on cerebral convexities, while rest of the organs were unremarkable. Microscopy of cerebrum, lung, kidney and spleen showed multiple abscesses with numerous foci of bacterial colonies admixed with acute inflammatory exudates. The bacterial colonies were also visualized inside the microvasculature; thus, favouring diagnosis of septicaemia with multiple pyemic abscess. The microbiological culture later on confirmed the growth of bacteria.

A 24-year-old, second gravida, 15 days postdelivery; brought dead to the hospital with history of head injury after sudden fall and death. Examination of cranial cavity and brain did not reveal any evidence of subdural, subarachnoid or intraparenchymal haemorrhage. The lungs showed features of pulmonary oedema and foci of intra-alveolar haemorrhage. Subscapular and intraparenchymal haemorrhage was noted in spleen. There was also evidence of cerebral oedema.

Discussion

Maternal mortality continues to be of great concern with almost (99%) all maternal deaths occurring in developing countries. One in 180 pregnant women die during childbirth as compared to 1 in 4,900 in developed countries (3). Globally it has been estimated that about half a million women die each year due to pregnancy related causes with 99% of them in developing countries (4). Mean age of the maternal deaths in the present study was 27 years with oldest patient of 37 years of age (1). The causes of maternal deaths have been classified as direct (resulting from obstetric complications of pregnancy, labour or puerperium) or indirect (resulting from pre-existing disease or disease aggravated by the physiological effects of pregnancy) depending upon their relationship with pregnancy.

The direct causes of maternal mortality include the haemorrhagic disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia or eclampsia, hepatic disorders due to pregnancy, amniotic fluid embolism, pulmonary embolism, abortion-related causes, puerperal sepsis and Intrauterine Foetal Death (IUFD)- induced maternal deaths. The indirect causes of death were classified further into hepatic, pulmonary, neurological, cardiovascular, renal, haematological, gastrointestinal, malignancy and infectious disease (5). The direct cause of maternal death in present study were postpartum haemorrhage, eclampsia and preeclampsia, puerperal sepsis. The indirect causes included were one case each of pneumonia, hepatitis E virus infection, sickle cell anaemia, tuberculosis, status epilepticus, viral meningoencephalitis and head injury. Majority (42.85%) of maternal deaths occurred within first 24 hours, where the direct causes of death predominate while indirect cause were more common when deaths occurred after 24 hours of hospital admission.

In a retrospective study of 95 maternal autopsies by Kavatkar AN et al., there were 47 (49.5%) direct obstetric deaths and 33(34.7%) indirect obstetric deaths (6). Hypertensive disorders were associated with pregnancy in 24.2% andanaemia 14.7% cases. In the hypertensive group, important findings were disseminated intravascular coagulation, haemorrhages indifferent organs and thromboembolism.

In autopsy group of 277 cases, studied by Panchabhai TS et al., the most common cause of maternal mortality was preeclampsia/eclampsia in 14.44% and haemorrhage in 11.55%; while amongst indirect causes, infectious aetiology in 9.75% and cardiac disease in 9.75% contributed to the cause of maternal death (2) (Table/Fig 7).

In developing countries, postpartum haemorrhage still remains the primary cause of maternal mortality (2),(7). In the present study, maximum deaths amongst direct causes occurred due to postpartum haemorrhage followed by two deaths each due to preeclampsia/ eclampsia and puerperal sepsis and one case due to DIC. Almost 100% of the obstetric haemorrhage related death occurred in primipara.

The diagnosis of preeclampsia was made in presence of arterial hypertension with systolic pressure of 140 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure 90 mmHg, proteinuria and hyperuricaemia, oedema related or not. Eclampsia has been diagnosed as the occurrence of tonic-clonic generalized convulsion in patients with preeclampsia (8). Acute pulmonary oedema was the principal cause of maternal death in patients with preeclampsia/ eclampsia in our study. Puerperal sepsis is an infection of the genital tract, which occurs due to rupture of amniotic sacs and within 42nd day of delivery. It happens mainly within first 24 hour of parturition. It is the third leading cause of direct maternal mortality in developing nations; and preventable conditions (9). The DIC is a systemic thrombo-haemorrhagic disorder seen in association with well-defined clinical situations and laboratory evidence of procoagulant activation, fibrinolytic activation, inhibitor consumption and biochemical evidence of end-organ damage or failure. It is always a secondary phenomenon and the inciting clinical events are in plenty, ranging from obstetrical complications to malignancy. Obstetrical conditions include amniotic fluid embolism, placental abruption, placenta previa, severe preeclampsia / eclampsia, HELLP syndrome (haemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, low platelet count), retained dead foetus, miscarriage, hypovolemia, septicaemia, and acute fatty liver of pregnancy (10),(11).

Hepatitis E virus infection has a bad prognosis in pregnancy, often leading to fulminant hepatic failure and death in up to 60% of cases. In our case, the clinical revealed history of jaundice and altered sensorium with signs of hepatic failure and deranged parameters of liver function test. Her serological markers for Hepatitis E were positive and she died within 4 days of admission. Liver on microscopy revealed extensive areas of pan acinar haemorrhagic necrosis, with few viable areas of liver parenchyma, features were consistent with fulminant hepatitis. It can here be reinforced that serology for viral markers should be carried out in each and every pregnant woman who presents with jaundice (1). Out of total 89 autopsies examined by Jashnani K et al., acute fulminant viral hepatitis was the commonest cause of indirect maternal deaths (37 cases, 41.5%). This was followed by direct causes like pregnancy-induced hypertension (12 cases, 13.4%) and puerperal sepsis (10 cases, 11.2%) (1).

Pneumonia is the most common cause of fatal non obstetric infections in pregnant women. The risk of pneumonia during pregnancy appears to be lowest during the first trimester however advanced gestational age has proven to be an independent risk factor for pneumonia. The other risk factors include anaemia, asthma, smoking, and use of antepartum corticosteroids and tocolytic agents (12). Sickle Cell Disease (SCD) is the most common inherited haemoglobinopathy and is associated with increased risk of complications and early mortality. Pregnancy is frequently complicated in sickle cell anaemics with mortality up to 4%. The physiological changes of pregnancy like increased metabolic demand, increased blood viscosity and hypercoagulability gets aggravates the precipitating factors thereby leading to increased incidence of complications like a vaso-occlusive crisis, osteonecrosis, hepatic necrosis, leg ulcers, and thromboembolic events.

Vaso-occlusion seen in placenta leads to villous fibrosis, necrosis, and infarction, thereby causing impaired uteroplacental circulation, which leads to chronic foetal hypoxia and adverse outcomes (13). Maternal mortality is high among women co-infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and Tuberculosis (TB). Tuberculosis as such is associated with increased mortality both during pregnancy and postpartum. In high-burden countries like India, it’s in the range of 0.07% to 0.5% among HIV-negative and 0.7% to 11% among HIV- positive mothers. Both pregnancy and tuberculosis can have adverse effects on each other and linked with poor outcomes (14). The overall mortality is increased in young people with epilepsy as compared with those without disease; however, for the women of child bearing age, the mortality is 15 times higher. The most important risk factor for sudden unexplained death in epilepsy is generalized tonic-clonic seizures, but it is not always possible to retrieve the information about seizure type and frequency (15). During pregnancy, women may prone for increased risk for certain infections and severity of its manifestations. The complain of seizures, headache, or altered behaviour in pregnant females, in addition to viral encephalitis can be attributed to number of other structural and metabolic causes which must also be excluded. Viral encephalitis usually presents as febrile illness with headache, impaired cognition, reduced consciousness, changes in personality/ behaviour and seizures (16).

Limitation(s)

This is a single institution-based study comprising of small sample size and was carried out over a period of two and half year. The reasons attributed to small size could be the reduced number of maternal deaths that might reflect a better patient care or it might be due to a smaller number of maternal deaths reported to this government medical college for autopsy. Another reason might be the issue of obtaining consent from next to kin for performing the autopsy.

Conclusion

Maternal mortality contributes to significant proportion of deaths in women. The deep analysis of its cause, proper and complete antenatal check-up visits as per the national programme to monitor pregnancy along with postpartum care can assist in early pick-up these complications. Thus, can help to avoid this preventable and inevitable loss. The knowledge gained from such studies can provide crucial and valuable insight for formulating strategies or policies to handle this crucial issue of national importance.

References

1.
Jashnani KD, Rupani A B, Wani RJ. Maternal mortality: An Autopsy audit. J Postgrad Med. 219:55(1);12-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Panchabhai TS, Patil PD, Shah DR, Joshi AS. An autopsy study of maternal mortality: A tertiary healthcare perspective. J Postgrad Med. 219;55(1):08-11.
3.
Apanga PA, Awoonor-Williams JK. Maternal Death in Rural Ghana: A Case Study in the Upper East Region of Ghana. Front Public Health. 2018;6:101. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Sultana N, Sultana R, Begum R. Maternal Mortality and Morbidity Due to Obstetric Haemorrhage: A One Year Review in a Tertiary Hospital. Med today. 2017;28:09-11. [crossref]
5.
Nour NM. An introduction to maternal mortality. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 218;1(2):77-81.
6.
Kavatkar AN, Sahasrabuddhe NS, Jadhav MV, Deshmukh SD. Autopsy study of maternal deaths. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 213;81(1):01-08. [crossref]
7.
Lucas S. Maternal death, autopsy studies, and lessons from Pathology. PLoS Med. 218;5(2):e48. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Amorim MMR, Santos LC, Porto AM, Martins LKD.Risk factors for maternal death in patients with severe preeclampsia and eclampsia. Rev Bras SaúdeMaterno-Infantil. 211;1:237-47. [crossref]
9.
Demisse GA, Sifer SD, Kedir B, Fekene DB, Bulto GA. Determinants of puerperal sepsis among post-partum women at public hospitals in west SHOA zone Oromia regional STATE, Ethiopia. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2019;19:959. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Sultana S, Begum A, Khan MA. Disseminated intravascular coagulation in obstetric practice. J Dhaka Med Coll. 2011;20(1):68-74. [crossref]
11.
Rattray DD, O'Connell CM, Baskett TF. Acute disseminated intravascular coagulation in obstetrics: a tertiary centre population review (1980 to 219). J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012; 34(4):341-47. [crossref]
12.
Tang P, Wang J, Song Y. Characteristics and pregnancy outcomes of patients with severe pneumonia complicating pregnancy: A retrospective study of 12 cases and a literature review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018;18(1):434. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Jain D, Atmapoojya P, Colah R, Lodha P. Sickle Cell Disease and Pregnancy. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2019;11(1):e2019040. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Bates M, Ahmed Y, Kapata N, Maeurer M, Mwaba P, Zumla A. Perspectives on tuberculosis in pregnancy. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;32:124-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Christensen J, Vestergaard C, Hammer Bech B. Maternal death in women with epilepsy: smaller scope studies. Neurology. 2018;91(18):1716-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Dodd KC, Michael BD, ZisoB. Herpes simplex virus encephalitis in pregnancy- A case report and review of reported patients in the literature. BMC Res Notes. 2015;8:118. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55337.16554

Date of Submission: Jan 31, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 24, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 12, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 14, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 02, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Apr 11, 2022 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com