Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 84222

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC27 - EC31 Full Version

Clinicopathology of Middle Ear Tumours: A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital, Hyderabad, India


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52936.16646
Narala Srivani, Thamidala Mahitha Joyce

1. Professor, Department of Pathology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Osmania Medical College, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Thamidala Mahitha Joyce,
House No. 8-6-100/22p, Plot No. 22, RTC Colony, Chintalkunta, L B Nagar, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
E-mail: mahijose9151@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Middle ear tumours are rare neoplasms that have non specific clinical presentation, otoscopic and imaging features and pose a diagnostic challenge. Most common neoplasm of middle ear are paraganglioma, schwannoma, haemangioma and middle ear adenoma.

Aim: To analyse the relative incidence, clinical presentation and histopathological spectrum of neoplasms in the middle ear at a tertiary care hospital, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted in Department of Pathology at Government ENT Hospital (tertiary referral ENT Hospital), Hyderabad, Telangana, India, from July 2014 to June 2019. Total 26 cases of middle ear tumours both incisional or excisional biopsies of middle ear lesions from all age group of either gender with complete clinical details were included in the study. Clinical and histopathological data were analysed after processing the sections with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stains examined microscopically. Statistical analysis was done using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 and mean, standard deviation and percentages were calculated.

Results: In the present study, maximum patients 11 (42.3%) were in age group of 41 to 50 years with female preponderance 18 (69.2%). Mean age of the patients were 42.92±12.53 years. Out of a total of 26 cases, 20 cases were benign neoplasms and six cases were malignant. Most common side of presentation was right side. Most of the benign tumours occurred in the 5th decade and malignant tumours were common in the 6th decade. Paragangliomas/Glomustympanicum tumours were most common benign tumours followed by schwannoma, haemangioma and middle ear adenoma. Whereas among malignant tumour, squamous cell carcinoma was common.

Conclusion: Middle ear tumours are relatively uncommon lesions presenting as mass in the ear, discharge, hearing loss, tinnitus and chronic suppurative otitis media. Benign tumours are more common than malignant tumours in the middle ear. Paraganglioma was the most common benign tumour encountered, followed by schwannomas, middle ear adenomas and haemangiomas. Middle ear tumours are rare and histologic analysis is essential for definitive diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords

Haemangioma, Polyp, Schwannoma, Squamous cell carcinoma

Middle ear neoplasms are rare with an incidence of 1 per 20,000. Benign tumours are more common than malignant tumours. The most common primary tumours are paragangliomas (glomustympanicum tumours) which occurs more frequently in females in the fourth decade and constitute 0.2% of head and neck lesions (1). Primary tumours from the middle ear space extend intracranial or into other portions of the temporal bone or skull base. Benign tumours of adjacent structures can invade the middle ear space; these tumours include vestibular and facial nerve schwannomas, temporal meningioma’s, and parotid gland tumours. The most common middle ear malignancy is squamous cell carcinoma, which is rare in the middle ear with an incidence of 0.03% accounting for 1.5% of head and neck malignancies (2),(3),(4). The most common symptom is mass in the ear followed by discharge, pain, pulsatile tinnitus and conductive deafness (3).

Middle ear tumours are rare and affect the quality of life due to hearing loss, pain, discharge and tinnitus. Histologic analysis is required for definitive diagnosis and adequate treatment due to non specific clinical, otoscopic and radiologic findings. The tumours of the middle ear resemble common otolaryngologic diseases, leading to delay in diagnosis or misdiagnosis (5).

In India and worldwide there are very limited studies on middle ear tumours which are mostly case reports or related to imaging studies (4),(5),(6),(7). So studies like the present study may help the clinician to know about rare diseases which may be helpful in early treatment and careful follow-up to prevent recurrence.

Hence, the present study was conducted to analyse the relative incidence, clinical presentation and spectrum of neoplasms in the middle ear at a tertiary referral ENT Hospital.

Material and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted in Department of Pathology at Government ENT Hospital (tertiary referral ENT Hospital), Hyderabad, Telangana, India, from July 2014 to June 2019 and was analysed from June 2019 to December 2019. Study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC No-136). Total 560 biopsy specimens from the ear were received. After following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, only 26 biopsy specimens of middle ear tumors were studied.

Inclusion criteria: Biopsies of middle ear tumours submitted to the Department of Pathology within the study period, for which all data were present, were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Inadequate tissue, biopsies of external ear, inflammations of middle ear, cholesteatomas and congenital lesions were excluded from the study.

Data Collection

All data were collected from the record book of the hospital. The relevant patient data such as age, gender, presenting complaints were collected. All the specimens were subjected to routine processing and paraffin embedding. The sections were stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and examined under a light microscope. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was done for the confirmation of the diagnosis wherever necessary. After thorough data collection; age, gender, type of tumour, histopathological diagnosis, incidence, clinical presentation and spectrum of neoplasms in the middle ear were analysed.

Statistical Analysis

The descriptive data were entered in Microsoft Excel and were analysed using Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 20.0 and mean, standard deviation and percentages were calculated.

Results

In the present study, age ranged from 19 to 68 years with a mean age of 42.92±12.53 years. Majority of benign tumours 11 (42.3%) cases were seen in 5th decade (41-50 years), while malignant tumours four cases (15.4%) were more common in the 6th decade (Table/Fig 1). The Male:Female ratio of benign tumors was 1:3.33 (males were five and females were 15) were as that of malignant tumors was 1:1 (males and females were three each) (Table/Fig 2).

The right ear was affected in a majority of the cases, 20 cases (76.9%) and left ear in six cases (23.1%). Out of the 26 middle ear neoplasms, benign tumours comprised of 20 cases (76.9%) and malignant tumours six cases (23.1%). Most common presentation of tumours was mass in middle ear seen in 25 (96.15%) cases followed by Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) in 8 (30.76%) cases, ear discharge and tinnitus 4 (15.38%) cases in each, loss of hearing in 2 (7.69%) cases and facial palsy in 1 (3.84%) case.

The most common presentation in paraganglionoma was pinkish pulsatile mass in 13 (100%) cases, followed by fowl smelling discharge 4 (30.76%), pulsatile tinnitus 4 (30.76%) and Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media (CSOM) and polyp 4 (30.76%). Also in schwannoma, haemangioma and squamous cell carcinoma, the most common presentation was mass in the ear (Table/Fig 3).

The most common benign tumour in present study was paraganglioma. The histopathological images of paraganglioma revealed nest and zellballen pattern of chief cells separated by vascular septa and eosinophilic granular cytoplasm. Also showed chromogranin positive for tumour cells consistent with paraganglioma (Table/Fig 4)a,(Table/Fig 4)b,(Table/Fig 4)c. There were three cases of haemangioma revealed capillary sized blood vessels of varying sizes lined by endothelial cells in histopathological findings [Table/Fig-5a].

[Table/Fig-5b] showing the hypercelluar and hypocellular areas of spindle cells in three cases of haemangioma. In present study, there was single case of middle ear adenoma. Histopathological findings of Middle Ear Adenoma (MEA) revealed sheets, nests, trabeculae of cuboidal cells with indistinct cell borders with dense eosinophilic cytoplasm and nuclei were round to oval with minimal pleomorphism, eccentric nucleus (Table/Fig 6)a,(Table/Fig 6)b.

Discussion

Middle ear tumours are relatively uncommon lesions present as mass in the ear, discharge, hearing loss, tinnitus, CSOM. Primary tumours from middle ear present as polyp in external auditory canal or extend intracranially or into the portions of temporal bone or skull base. In the present study 5 year duration, 560 ear biopsy specimens, only 26 were middle ear tumours accounting for 5% of all ear biopsies. Peak incidence of benign tumours was seen in the 5th decade which is similar to other studies (6),(7). The peak incidence of malignant tumours was seen in the 6th decade which is similar to other studies (5). Male: Female ratio of benign tumours was 1:3.33 and of malignant tumours was 1:1.

In this study, most common benign middle ear tumour was paraganglioma 13 (50%) predominantly seen in females in the right ear as compared to other studies (5),(6),(7),(8),(9). Paraganglioma is the most common primary middle ear tumour and the second most common tumour of the temporal bone. Glomus tumours originate in the paraganglia present throughout the temporal bone, including on the jugular dome, the promontory of the middle ear, and along the jacobson/tympanic branch of glossopharyngeal nerve (12%) and arnold nerve/auricular branch of vagus nerve (3%) (10).

Paraganglioma are subclassified according to size. These are benign slow growing and extremely vascular tumours but locally destroying the skull base structures. They can paralyse the face, spread along paths of least resistance and spread even to the brain if not treated. The most common presenting symptoms are conductive hearing loss, pulsatile tinnitus mass in the ear, blood stained discharge as compared to studies (8),(9),(10),(11). Large glomus tumours may also cause vertigo, facial palsy, and even sensory neural hearing loss. In rare cases, they may produce hormones, such as adrenalin, causing rapid heartbeat, headaches, flushing, sweating, and diarrhoea mimicking symptoms of hyperthyroidism and lead to confusion in diagnosis, which may be differentiated with blood investigations (12).

On otoscopy seen as presence of reddish pulsatile mass behind the tympanic membrane. Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans are the primary imaging modalities used in evaluating the size and extent of glomus tumours (13). Microscopically jugulotympanic paragangliomas had zellballen pattern or nests of chief cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm surrounded by sustentacular cells interlaced with a rich network of capillaries and venules (14). All 13 cases in present study showed histological features of paragangliomas confirmed with IHC using chromogranin, synaptophysin. Total 11 out of 13 cases 29showed intense cytoplasmic positivity with chromogranin and synaptophysin.

The three treatment modalities available for these tumours are observation with regular CT monitoring, surgical excision, and radiotherapy. The preferred treatment modality for glomus tumours is surgical excision of the tumour but because of its location and extreme vascularity, resection of this tumour can be complicated and challenging (15). To reduce bleeding complication during surgery preoperative embolisation is done. Most promising results have been shown by radiotherapy, particularly gamma knife radiosurgery, with good tumour growth control and less risk of cranial nerve injury (15).

In present study, three cases of haemangioma were diagnosed which showed slit like vessels lined by endothelial cells. Total 15 cases of isolated middle ear haemangiomas have been reported in the literature till date (16). A study reported that vascular lesions of temporal bone constitute both haemangiomas and vascular malformations (17). The extensive blood supply surrounding scarpa’s ganglion and the geniculate ganglion makes this region more susceptible to these tumours (17).

There were three cases of schwannoma with female preponderance and facial palsy in 50% cases as compared to other study (18). Middle ear schwannoma arises from the facial nerve, and its branches: the tympanic branch of the glossopharyngeal nerve/jacobsons nerve and the auricular branch of the vagus nerve/arnolds nerve, the chorda tympani; the stapedial nerve. In cases of facial nerve schwannoma, High Resolution Computed Tomography (HRCT) scan shows enlargement of the fallopian canal with hypodense lesion in middle ear with ossicular erosion and erosion of stylomastoid foramen which are nonspecific, also seen in paraganglioma and cholesteatoma (19).

In present study, authors encountered one rare case of middle ear adenoma with neuroendocrine differentiation which occurred in fifth decade and presented with hearing loss as compared to other studies (20),(21),(22). Middle ear adenomas are rare constituting less than 2% of all ear tumours. Hyams VJ and Michaels L, first described these tumours in 1976. Middle ear adenomas are rare glandular neoplasms that may have originated from the mucosal epithelium of the middle ear or neural crest precursor (20). In 1980, Murphy GF et al., described a similar tumour named as carcinoid tumour due to the ultrastructural evidence of a neuroendocrine differentiation. In the literature till date, there is still much debate about the true nature of these neoplasms (21).They are same tumours with different degrees of glandular and neuroendocrine differentiation, are named as neuroendocrine adenoma of the middle ear by Derlacki EL and Barney PL, in 1976 (22). In 1980, although benign, it may show metastasis as described by Mooney EE et al., (23).

The middle ear adenoma neuroendocrine differentiation presents with aural fullness, tinnitus, otorrhea, unilateral conductive hearing loss, otalgia, and facial nerve palsy. They rarely present with symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. On otoscopic examination seen as bulged tympanic membrane with reddish to whitish mass (24). The patient in current study presented with complaints of fullness, tinnitus and mass in the right ear and hearing loss. In present study, middle ear adenoma is composed of glandular or tubular formation,solid sheets, nests, cribriform pattern, trabeculae of cuboidal cells with indistinct cell borders with dense eosinophilic cytoplasm, nuclei are round to oval with minimal pleomorphism, eccentric nucleus and salt and pepper chromatin consistent with neuroendocrine origin, stroma is fibrotic (21),(25).

Tumour cells are characteristically positive for epithelial markers like cytokeratin, predominantly CK7 (89.6%), CAM 5.2. Neuroendocrine markers like chromogranin-A, neuron specific enolase, synaptophysin [23,26]. The main differential diagnosis of middle ear adenoma neuroendocrine differentiation, is paraganglioma. Immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin can help to differentiate the two lesions. Paraganglioma is negative for cytokeratin

Complete surgical removal of the tumour mass with negative margins and careful long term follow-up is the treatment of choice [23,26]. Majority of these tumours are benign with local recurrence of 12-18% due to incomplete removal of the tumour or the involvement of the ossicular chain. Therefore, careful follow-up is mandatory. Subsequent surgery to remove the other involved structures may result in better clinical outcome (25).

In present study, squamous cell carcinoma was the most common malignant tumour in the middle ear occurring in the 6th decade as compared to study done by Shu MT et al., (4). Microscopy of all cases showed the features of well differentiated squamous Cell carcinomas. Malignant tumours arising in the middle ear are rare, accounting for only 0.25% of the malignant tumours in this region, and with a low incidence rate of approximately 0.03% (27). The classical symptoms are mucopurulent or blood stained ear discharge, intractable pain, sudden deafness, facial palsy and rarely other symptoms of inner ear damage. The common age range of presentation is between the 5th-6th decade. The pre-existing CSOM with or without cholesteatoma delays the diagnosis and poses diagnostic and therapeutic problem. As per literature, 75-85% of primary middle ear carcinomas occur secondary to chronic supportive otitis media which may be due to metaplasia of the middle ear mucosa caused by chronic inflammation (28),(29),(30). In the present study, four patients had a history of chronic suppurative otitis media of more than 30 years duration as compared to other studies (31).

Histopathology confirmation of masses and polyps is of clinical significance in early diagnosis and treatment (32). Squamous cell carcinoma in the early stage is curable and in the advanced stage, surgical resection with radiotherapy and chemotherapy can improve the survival. The factors which favor poor prognosis are involvement of facial nerve, margins, dural involvement, severe pain and regional lymph node involvement. Most of these malignant tumours need to be excised properly but are difficult because of intracranial extension (33).

Limitation(s)

As the study was a retrospective study with a small sample size due to rarity, detailed evaluation could not be done, so, a study with larger number may be necessary for knowing the aetiological risk factors, predisposition and complete understanding of these tumours for better patient outcome.

Conclusion

Middle ear neoplasms are important differential diagnoses of middle ear infections and masses. Benign tumours are more common than malignant tumours in the middle ear. Histological diagnosis and confirmation with immunohistochemistry is needed in all middle ear tumours as clinical and radiological findings are non specific. In the majority of the cases, surgical excision with careful follow-up is needed to prevent recurrence. The aetiological factors in primary middle ear carcinomas are unknown but one cause is CSOM can lead to squamous cell carcinoma in elderly patients due to metaplasia in the middle ear caused by inflammation. Future studies with more number of cases and long duration is necessary to provide knowledge about the clinical, biologic behaviour, recurrenceand metastatic potential of these middle ear tumours for better management.

References

1.
O’Leary MJ, Shelton C, Giddings NA, Kwalter J, Brackmann DE. Glomus tympanicum tumors: A clinical perspective. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:1038-43. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Gidley PW, Roberts DB, Strrgis EM. Squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1144-51. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Dornhoffer J. Cartilage tympanoplasty: Indications, techniques and outcomes in a 1000 patient series. Laryngoscope. 2003;113(11)1844-56. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Shu MT, Lee JC, Yang CC, Wu KC. Squamous cell carcinoma of the middle ear. Ear Nose Throat J. 2012;91:14. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Nora M. Weiss rare diseases of the middle ear and lateral skull base. Laryngorhinootologie. 2021;100(1):s1-30.
6.
Agarwal NM, Popat VC, Traviad C, Srivastava A. Clinical and histopathological study of mass in ear: A study of fifty cases. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;65(3):520-25. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Trojanowska A, Drop A, Trojanowski P, Rosinska-Bogusiewicz K, Klatka J, Bobek-Billewicz B, et al. External and middle ear diseases: Radiological diagnosis based on clinical signs and symptoms. Insights Imaging. 2012;3(1):33-48. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Fishbein L, Nathanson KL. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: Understanding the complexities of the genetic background. Cancer Genet. 2012;205(1-2):01-11. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Missale P, Lepcha A, Tyagi AK. Glomus tympanicum: Clinical presentation, management and outcomes. Indian J of Otol. 2018;24:56-59 . [crossref]
10.
Sanna M, Fois P, Passanisi E, Russo A, Bacciu A. Middle ear and mastoid Glomus tumors (glomustympanicum An algorithm for surgical management. Auris nasus Larynx. 2010;37(6):661-68. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Carlson ML, Sweeney AD, Pelosi S, Wanna GB, Glasscock ME 3rd, Haynes DS. Glomus tympanicum: A review of 115 cases over 4 decades. Otolaryngology Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(1):136-42. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Appannan VR, Md Daud MK. Glomus tympanicum. Malays Fam Physician. 2018;13(1):45-48.
13.
Amin MF, El Ameen NF. Diagnostic efficiency of multidetector computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of head and neck paragangliomas from other mimicking vascular lesions: Comparison with histopathologic examination. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270(3):1045-53. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Manolidis S, Shohet JA, Jackson CG, Glasscock ME. Malignant glomus tumours. Laryngoscope. 1999;109(1):30-34. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Fayad JN, Keles B, Brackmann DE. Jugular foramen tumors: Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31:299-05. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Tokyol C, Yilmaz MD. Middle ear hemangioma: A case report. Am J Otolaryngol. 2003;24:403-07. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Rathi A, Syed KA, Suryawanshi M, John M. Otological Hemangioma: A Case Report and Literature Review. Int J Otorhinolaryngology Clin. 2017;9(3):102-05. [crossref]
18.
Matthew LC, Nicholas LD, Patel NS, Lundy LS, Tombers NM, Lohse CM, et al. Facial nerve schwannomas: Review of 80 cases over 25 years at mayo clinic. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2016;91(11):1563-76. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Kesser BW, Brackmann DE, Ma Y, Weiss M. Jacobsons nerve schwannoma: A rare middle ear mass. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001;110(11):1030-04. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Hyams VJ, Michaels L. Benign adenomatous neoplasm of middle ear. Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences. 1976;1(1):17-26. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Murphy GF, Pilch BZ, Dickersin GR, Goodman ML, Nadol JB Jr. Carcinoid tumor of the middle ear. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980;73:816-23. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Derlacki EL, Barney PL. Adenomatous tumors of the middle ear and mastoid. Laryngoscope. 1976;86:1123-35. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Mooney EE, Dodd LG, Oury TD, Burchette JL, Layfield LJ, Scher RL, et al. Middle ear carcinoid: An indolent tumor with metastatic potential. Head Neck. 1999;21:72-75. 3.0.CO;2-G>[crossref]
24.
Yadav SK, Naeem R, Sharma A, Singh S, Sarin N, Pruthi SK. Middle ear adenoma with neuroendocrine differentiation: Report of a rare case. Indian J Cancer. 2020;57:98-01. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Lott Limbach AA, Hoschar AP, Thompson LD, Stelow EB, Chute DJ. Middle ear adenomas stain for two cell populations and lack myoepithelial cell differentiation. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6(3):345-53. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Salibaba I, Evrard AS. Middle ear glandular neoplasms: Adenoma, carcinoma or adenoma with neuroendocrine differentiation a case series. Cases J. 2009;6508(2):3. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Gidley PW, Roberts DB, Sturgis EM. Squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:1144-51. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
El-Naggar AK, Chan JKC, Grandis JR, Takata T, Slootweg PJ. Eds.“Tumours of the ear,” in WHO Classification of Tumours of the Head and Neck, Lyon: IARC Press, Lyon, France, UK, 4th edition, 2017(261-73).
29.
Elsürer C, Senkal HA, Zayyan E, Yilmaz T, Kaya S. Bilateral external auditory canal squamous cell carcinoma: A case report. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;264:941-45. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Tsai ST, Li C, Jin YT, Chao WY, Su IJ. High prevalence of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in middle-ear carcinomas. Int J Cancer. 1997;71:208-12. 3.0.CO;2-D>[crossref]
31.
Masterson L, Rouhani M, Donnelly NP, Tysome JR, Patel P, Jefferies SJ, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the temporal bone: Clinical outcomes from radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(3):501-08.[crossref][PubMed]
32.
Qian ZJ, Coffey AM, O’Toole KM, Lalwani AK. Management of benign middle ear tumors: A series of 7 cases. Ear, Nose & Throat Journal. 2017;96(10-374 11):426-32. [crossref][PubMed]
33.
Hu XD, Wu TT, Zhou SH. Squamous cell carcinoma of the middle ear: Report of three cases. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(2):2979-84.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52936.16646

Date of Submission: Dec 09, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Jan 24, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 13, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 12, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 30, 2022 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com