Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 82965

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC21 - EC26 Full Version

Placental Changes in Perinatal Death- An Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in North Karnataka


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53190.16643
Priyadharshini Bargunam, Parvathi S Jigalur, Purusotham Reddy, Jamuna Kanakaraya

1. Junior Resident, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. 4. Additional Chief Health Director, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Central Hospital, South Western Railway, Hubballi, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Parvathi S Jigalur,
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka-580022, India.
E-mail: spjigalur@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Placenta is poetically described as a diary which bears the events of intrauterine life; hence examining them, especially in perinatal death can provide valuable information regarding the cause of death and sometimes gives an idea about recurrence of such events.

Aim: To describe the various placental lesions in perinatal death and compare them with equal number of normal placentae.

Materials and Methods: This prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted in tertiary care centre, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. All placentae, irrespective of the gestational age, received in the Department of Pathology, from October 1st 2017 to March 31st 2019 were collected after taking an informed consent. A total of 539 cases were received in this time frame, of which 121 (22.45%) were dead and included in the study and were compared with 121 normal placentae (alive), without any maternal co-morbidities. The placentae were grossed and assessed according to Amsterdam guidelines. The significance of the difference observed was established by Chi-square test using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 21.0.

Results: Of these 121 cases, 89 (73.5%) cases had placental changes, whereas 32 (26.5%) cases were devoid of placental changes. Placental infarct and increased syncytial knots were seen contributing maximum to foetal death in 31 (25.6%) cases followed by chorioamnionitis. Rare cases like Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion (TRAP) syndrome, Persistent Right Umbilical Vein (PRUV), maternal floor infarct were also reported.

Conclusion: Despite many antenatal imaging advances, placental examination still remains valuable in diagnosing cause of death and growth restriction in the foetus especially recurrent causes, favouring clinical intervention in those cases.

Keywords

Increased syncytial knots, Intrauterine death, Maternal floor infarct, Placental infarct

Throughout the world there are more than 3 million perinatal deaths reported every year (1). India, with perinatal mortality rate of 26 per 1000 live births, still struggles to end preventable still births and neonatal deaths, despite tremendous improvements in maternal and child health now-a-days. Besides, these deaths cause a significant negative psychological impact on the mother. Autopsy, by confirming the cause of death, helps to predict the recurrence risk and hence affects the future reproductive decision of the couple (2). Placental causes of foetal death contribute to upto 33% of the various causes of still birth and can never be overlooked. This study, is done along with a bigger study to describe the various placental lesions in perinatal death, compare them with equal number of normal placentae and arrive at significant conclusion (3).

Material and Methods

This prospective, comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted in tertiary care centre, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubballi, Karnataka, India. All placenta specimens received in the Department of Pathology from October 2017 to March 2019 were collected after taking an informed consent. Of the 539 cases received in the Department, 121 (22.45%) cases were dead. Ethical clearance was obtained vide No. KIMS/PGS/SYN/447/2017-18 before starting the study, dated 21/11/2017.

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: These dead cases, irrespective of cause of death- be it maternal/foetal or non obstetric causes were included in this study and were compared with 121 normal other placentae which were devoid of any significant maternal illness which could possibly contribute to placental changes. Unbooked cases without proper previous records were also excluded from the control group.

Study Procedure

The placenta specimens preserved in 10% formalin were received in the Department of Pathology. These predominantly included specimen were from the labour ward and Elective and Emergency Operation Theatres, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology of the Institute and the samples received from peripheral hospitals of the district. These specimens were subjected to thorough gross examination for the measurement of weight, diameter and thickness and cut open by bread-loafing it and examined for clots, infarcts and fibrin deposits. After adequate fixation over a minimum period of 24 hours, representative bits were taken for microscopic examination, processed and stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) and studied. Special stains like Gomori methanamine silver (to confirm fungal infections), gram stain (Bacterial infection), Masson trichrome staining, Periodic Acid Schiff (PAS) stain were used.

Amsterdam guidelines were implemented for both gross and microscopic examination (4). Sections from the placental parenchyma were examined for features of acute or chronic infarct, abnormal maturation, villitis, calcification, fibrin deposition (grading used from + to 4+), villous oedema, foetal vessel thrombosis, endarteritis of stem villi and the patency of vasculosyncytial membrane. Syncytial knots were counted in 100 tertiary villi and compared with the standards for corresponding gestational age. Umbilical cords were examined for signs of infection and thrombosis. Membranes were examined for signs of infection. The results of dead vs alive were statistically analysed for significance.

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered in Microsoft excel and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences software (SPSS) version 21.0. The significance of the difference observed was established by Chi- square test. The p-value <0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

Of the 539 cases included in this study, 121 (22.45%) cases were dead. Of these 121 cases, 89 (73.5%) cases had placental changes, indicating the contribution of abnormal placenta in adverse foetal outcome, whereas 32 (26.5%) cases were devoid of placental changes. Among the placental changes, infarct and increased syncytial knots, which are features of hypoxia and malperfusion, were seen contributing maximum to foetal death in 31 (25.6%) cases followed by chorioamnionitis in 16 (13.3%) cases. The (Table/Fig 1) shows various histopathological and gross findings in the placentae of dead foetuses as compared to live foetuses.

Discussion

Placenta was often overlooked by surgical pathologists because of its complexity in histology which differs in different gestational age groups which makes it difficult to interpret without supporting data like Ultrasonography (USG) findings, confirming the gestational age. For instance, if the placenta of 28 weeks gestational age shows mature intermediate villi, it is normal, but the same in a 34-36 week gestational age should be interpreted as villous dysmaturity. If the gestational age is not accurate because of wrong dates, or irregular menstrual cycles, then the problem sets in.

Moreover, the placental changes are not specific for a particular disorder. A variety of disorders may show a similar change like infarct in the placenta. A maternal eclampsia may produce infarcts, but not all infarcts are produced by maternal pre-eclampsia/eclampsia. Besides, there might be multiple disorders in a single patient and the final picture is often very complicated. Some placental and decidual changes tend to recur in the subsequent pregnancies and cause recurrent foetal loss as well. Thus, studying the placentae in detail grossly and microscopically can give us a clear idea of the pathology in the foetus and mother in selected cases and may help face the recurrent conditions better by means of effective parental counselling. Villitis of unknown aetiology, maternal floor infarct, decidual angiopathy are some of the recurrent lesions in placentae and has to be looked for during the examination.

Placental changes in Intrauterine Death (IUD): Man J et al., studied 946 still birth cases and concluded that 32% cases had abnormalities of the placenta, cord or membranes which lead to the cause of death with one third of still births (≥24 weeks) presenting with isolated placental histological abnormality (5). The cause of death was ascending infection in 176 (19%) cases. Maternal vascular malperfusion was the largest category among the placental abnormalities in still birth, especially in the early third trimester, which is consistent with our study. Tellefsen CH and Vogt C studied 104 cases and concluded that significant placental pathology was found in 69.2% of the perinatal deaths; as compared to 89 (73.5%) cases (% among the dead) in present study, 12 (9.6%) cases had small, possibly contributing changes; 14 (11.5%) cases did not show any pathology of interest; and there were changes of uncertain significance in 6 (4.9%) cases of the deaths in their study (6). Their most frequently observed diagnoses were infection (22.1%), degenerative changes (13.5%), and abruptio placentae (12.5%). However, in present study infarcts and increased syncytial knots were the most common placental change (Table/Fig 2). The (Table/Fig 3), (Table/Fig 4) shows chorioamnionitis and chorangiosis respectively and (Table/Fig 5) shows pale friable large placenta associated foetal cardiac illness.

Heazell AE and Martindale EA, concluded that placental examination contributed useful information to the classification of 47% of still births (7). Kidron D et al., studied 120 cases and found that 88% of the underlying causes of death were related to the placental disc, umbilical cord or chorioamnionitis (8). Bonetti LR et al., studied 124 cases and concluded that through analysis of the placenta, they were able to reduce the unexplained still birth rate from 20.16% to 15% (9). The major conditions associated to still births were fetoplacental infection, and placental insufficiency mainly associated with IUGR (<10th customised percentile).

Pinar H et al., studied 518 still births and compared them with 1200 live births and concluded that among still births, inflammation and retroplacental hematoma were more common in placentas from early deliveries, while thrombotic lesions were more common in later gestation (10). Ptacek I et al., did a systematic review of placental changes in still birth and concluded that the proportion of still births attributed to a placental cause ranged from 11-65%, based on the different classification system used, which affects the utility of histopathological examination of the placenta (11). And he emphasised on the need of a common classification system which could rectify this problem.

Villitis of unknown aetiology: Two cases (1.65%) of villitis of unknown aetiology were seen in this study as shown in (Table/Fig 6). Villitis of Unknown Aetiology (VUE), also known as chronic villitis, is an inflammation involving placental villi. VUE is a recurrent condition which is known to cause Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) resulting in the poor growth of the foetus, still birth, miscarriage and premature delivery (12),(13). VUE recurs in about 1/3 of subsequent pregnancies and is predominantly seen in term placentas (around 80%) (14). Hence, VUE in a placenta less than 32 weeks old should be screened for infectious villitis (12). Both the cases reported in this study were in the dead group and were preterm, suggesting a possible infective aetiology in these cases.

Maternal floor infarct: There were two cases of maternal floor infarct in this study. A 20-year-old primi with 32 weeks gestational age presented with lack of foetal movements, USG revealed intrauterine foetal death. She was induced and the foetus and the placenta was delivered and sent for examination. The foetus weighed 550 grams, and the placenta weighed 80 grams. Foetal autopsy did not reveal any gross or microscopic changes but grossly, placenta had a thick layer of fibrin deposition 0.6 cm thick occupying the whole of maternal surface and had an area of remote infarct measuring 3x3x2 cm as shown in (Table/Fig 7). Microscopically, the placenta showed areas of ghost villi which are crowded and back to back, surrounding viable areas showed increased syncytial knots of 47/100 mature tertiary villi, suggesting an ongoing hypoxic episode. Besides, there was accelerated villous maturation and areas of avascular villi as shown in (Table/Fig 8). Moreover, the areas corresponding to maternal floor fibrin showed a layer of fibrin deposition in microscopy as well. All these features point to the diagnosis of maternal floor infarct.

There was another similar case in this study, a 22 year- G2P1L0D1- female with 35 weeks gestation presented with IUD. Autopsy of the foetus revealed no abnormality, on the contrary, placenta showed several significant changes, contributing to foetal death. Placental maternal surface showed a 0.4 cm thick layer of fibrin deposition, a remote peripheral wedge infarct measuring 2x2x2 cm as shown in (Table/Fig 9). Umbilical cord revealed single umbilical artery. Microscopy confirmed the areas of maternal floor infarct and wedge infarct. Besides, they showed increased syncytial knots (28/100 terminal villi) and features of acute chorioamnionitis.

Benirschke K and Driscoll SG first described maternal floor infarction of the placenta (15). Massive Perivillous Fibrin Deposition (MPFD) and Maternal Floor Infarction (MFI) are placental pathology of unknown aetiology characterised by extensive deposition of fibrinoid material in the intervillous space which appears as pinkish acellular areas microscopically. The surrounding villi are generally sclerosed and hypoplastic (15),(16). Fibrin and/or fibrinoid material deposition interferes with perfusion and gas/nutrient exchange in the intervillous space, which results in chronic placental insufficiency (17),(18),(19). Pregnancy with MPFD is associated with spontaneous abortion foetal growth restriction and foetal death (16),(17),(19),(20),(21),(22). Andres RL et al., reported 48 maternal floor infarcts with a mortality rate of 40% and a recurrence rate of 12% (17). Hence, it is suggested to rule out maternal disease like MPFD when there are multiple abortions without any successful pregnancy (15).

Romero R et al., found that plasma cell deciduitis, maternal anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I positivity, positive C4d deposition on umbilical vein endothelium were found to be significantly higher in cases with MPFD than in those with normal term deliveries. Besides, specific maternal antibody against foetal HLA antigen class I or II and maternal plasma concentration of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 10 (CXCL10) were higher in patients with evidence of MPFD than in those without evidence of MFPD. Hence, it is postulated that maternal floor infarct could be a feature of maternal antifoetal rejection (23). Other aetiologic hypotheses include infection cytotoxicity, and a final common pathway of other disorders (24),(25),(26).

Anti-phospholipid Antibody (APLA) syndrome: Three cases were positive for IgM APLA antibodies, one of these cases presented with recurrent second trimester abortions. The foetus growth was retarded, but placenta did not show any change grossly or microscopically as compared with normal placentae. But, considering the small sample size, further larger studies has to be done to exclude the role of placental pathology in recurrent abortions in these cases.

Umbilical vessel abnormalities- single umbilical artery: Abnormal vessels were reported in 15 cases, all of them falling in the dead group. Single Umbilical Artery (SUA) were reported in 14 (93.3%)cases and Supranumerary or PRUV is seen in 1 (6.6%) case. A SUA is found in about 1 in 200 deliveries (27). Several studies have confirmed that SUA is associated with chromosomal abnormalities especially trisomy and multiple foetal defects (28),(29). Dagklis T et al., concluded that the finding of an SUA with co-existant foetal defects in USG were associated with chromosomal abnormalities (29). However, he insisted that isolated SUA has little association with chromosomal abnormalities. Hua M et al., concluded that there was an increased risk of IUGR in foetuses with single umbilical artery is made and recommended serial growth monitoring in those cases (30). Bombrys AE et al., performed a case-control study comparing 297 pregnancies with SUA to 297 pregnancies with DUA and concluded that there was not statistically significant increase in IUGR in SUA group (13.7% in SUA compared with 13.9% in DUA, p-value=0.93) (31). In above mentioned study, omphalomesentric/allantoic duct remnant was seen in cases.

Persistence of right umbilical vein: This study included one case with supernumerary umbilical vessels. The mother was G3A2 with recurrent second trimester abortion. The child died in utero, and the autopsy revealed no obvious findings except for supernumerary umbilical vessels. Microscopically, the cord had two arteries and two veins. The condition in which the right vein remains patent is termed ‘‘Persistence of Right Umbilical Vein” (PRUV) (32), it is due to the maintenance of the patency of the normal left umbilical vein and persistence of the caudal part of the right umbilical vein (33). Less than 15 such cases are being reported in the literature (34). Several reports have insisted on foetal echocardiography in antenatally diagnosed cases of umbilical vein abnormalities to rule out foetal hydrops, as these cases are more prone for the same (32),(35),(36).

Twin arterial reverse perfusion syndrome: There were were three cases cases of twin to twin transfusion syndrome in this study; one of them was a case of TRAP syndrome. Incidence of acardiac twin resulting from TRAP is 1:34,600 births or 1% of all monozygotic twins (37), wherein the normal twin ‘pumps’ or ‘donates’ blood to the abnormal twin, which is called the ‘recipient’ or ‘perfused’ twin through abnormal artery-to-artery or venous-to-venous communications in the placenta (38). In present case, the recipient twin had abnormal upper trunk with absent face, anophthalmia, absent ears and mouth. Internal examination showed absent bilateral lungs, heart and liver. It was associated with single umbilical artery, as seen in 75% of these cases and the umbilical cord diameter was small compared to the donor umbilical cord. Reduction of blood supply in early trimesters are known to cause reabsorption of the tissues affected, resulting in complete absence or atresia of organs (39). Recurrence of TRAP syndrome is likely to be low and the couples can be counselled positively for future pregnancy (40). The another case was that of twin to twin transfusion syndrome with monochorionic, monoamniotic placenta. One of the foetuses survived while the other was dead. Placenta towards the dead foetus showed areas of remote infarction and increased syncytial knots. Here, (Table/Fig 10) shows the microscopic features of placenta of both donor and recipient part of the placenta.

Umbilical cord abnormalities: Abnormal umbilical cord insertion was associated with foetal death and was seen in 12 (9.9%) cases in the dead group as compared with 4 (3.3%) cases in alive group (p value-0.038). Brouillet S et al., studied the influence of abnormal cord insertion on optimal birth weight achievement and found that only 17/343 (5.0%) of infants with central cord insertion were growth restricted, as compared to 37/185 (20%) of the infants with a peripheral insertion and neonates with centrally inserted cord were found to be significantly heavier (41). In present study, 14 (87.5%) cases with abnormal cord insertion showed growth restriction and 12 (75%) cases with abnormal cord insertion were appropriate for gestation. The (Table/Fig 5)d shows hypercoiled umbilical cord.

Limitation(s)

The comparison group is not matched with age, gestational age. However since the sample size is large, the findings can be generalised.

Conclusion

Despite many antenatal imaging advances, postnatal placental examination still remains valuable in contributing to identifying cause of death and growth restriction in the foetus especially recurrent causes, favouring clinical intervention.

Further studies should be done on individual recurrent causes of foetal loss with larger sample size of individual entities to find specific characteristic findings in these entities.

Author declarations: Three other studies were done simulataneously (Reference number 3) and have overlapping methodology as the data were collected simultaneously though the objectives and the subjects of these studies are unique and unrelated.

References

1.
Cousens S, Blencowe H, Stanton C, Chou D, Ahmed S, Steinhardt L, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2009 with trends since 1995: A systematic analysis. The Lancet. 2011;377(9774):1319-30. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62310-0. PMID: 21496917. [crossref]
2.
Sankar VH, Phadke SR. Clinical utility of fetal autopsy and comparison with prenatal ultrasound findings. Journal of Perinatology. 2006;26(4):224-9. Doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211482. PMID: 16541112. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Bargunam P, Jigalur P, Reddy P. Proportionality of Clinical Outcome and Placental Changes to the Increasing Severity of Maternal Hypertension- An Observational Study. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2021;1(1). English. Doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2021.01563. PMID: 34854472. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Khong TY, Mooney EE, Ariel I, Balmus NC, Boyd TK, Brundler MA, et al. Sampling and definitions of placental lesions: Amsterdam placental workshop group consensus statement. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 2016;140(7):698-713. Doi: 10.5858/arpa.2015-0225-CC. Epub 2016 May 25. PMID: 27223167. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Man J, Hutchinson JC, Heazell AE, Ashworth M, Jeffrey I, Sebire NJ. Stillbirth and intrauterine fetal death: Role of routine histopathological placental findings to determine cause of death. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2016;48(5):579-84. Doi: 10.1002/uog.16019. Epub 2016 Oct 25. PMID: 27781319. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Tellefsen CH, Vogt C. How important is placental examination in cases of perinatal deaths?. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 2011;14(2):99-104. Doi: 10.2350/10-07-0870-OA.1. Epub 2010 Aug 18. PMID: 20718631. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Heazell AE, Martindale EA. Can post-mortem examination of the placenta help determine the cause of stillbirth?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2009;29(3):225-28. Doi: 10.1080/01443610802716042. PMID: 19358031. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Kidron D, Bernheim J, Aviram R. Placental findings contributing to fetal death, a study of 120 stillbirths between 23 and 40 weeks gestation. Placenta. 2009;30(8):700-04. Doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2009.05.009. Epub 2009 Jun 16. PMID: 19535137. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Bonetti LR, Ferrari P, Trani N, Maccio L, Laura S, Giuliana S, et al. The role of fetal autopsy and placental examination in the causes of fetal death: A retrospective study of 132 cases of stillbirths. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2011;283(2):231-41. Doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1317-4. Epub 2010 Jan 6. PMID: 20052483. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Pinar H, Goldenberg RL, Koch MA, Heim-Hall J, Hawkins HK, Shehata B, et al. Placental findings in singleton stillbirths. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2014;123(2 0 1):325. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000100. PMID: 24402599; PMCID: PMC3948332. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Ptacek I, Sebire NJ, Man JA, Brownbill P, Heazell AE. Systematic review of placental pathology reported in association with stillbirth. Placenta. 2014;35(8):552-62. Doi: 10.1016/j.placenta. 2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 6. PMID: 24953162. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Redline RW. Villitis of unknown etiology: Noninfectious chronic villitis in the placenta. Human Pathology. 2007;38(10):1439-46. Doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.05.025. PMID: 17889674. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Tamblyn JA, Lissauer DM, Powell R, Cox P, Kilby MD. The immunological basis of villitis of unknown etiology-review. Placenta. 2013;34(10):846-55. Doi:10.1016/j.placenta.2013.07.002. PMID 23891153. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Feeley L, Mooney EE. Villitis of unknown aetiology: Correlation of recurrence with clinical outcome. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010;30(5):476-9. Doi:10.3109/01443611003802339. PMID 20604650. S2CID 11473529. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Benirschke K, Driscoll SG. Maternal floor infarction. In: Benirschke K, Driscoll SG, eds. Pathology of the Human Placenta. New York: Springer-Verlag; 1967;328-30. [crossref]
16.
Katzman PJ, Genest DR. Maternal floor infarction and massive perivillous fibrin deposition: Histological definitions, association with intrauterine fetal growth restriction, and risk of recurrence. Pediatric and Developmental Pathology. 2002;5(2):159-64. Doi: 10.1007/s10024001-0195-y. Erratum in: Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2003;6(1):102. PMID: 11910510. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Andres RL, Kuyper W, Resnik R, Piacquadio KM, Benirschke K. The association of maternal floor infarction of the placenta with adverse perinatal outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1990;163(3):935-8. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(90)91100-q. PMID: 2403172. [crossref]
18.
Naeye RL. Maternal floor infarction. Human Pathology. 1985;16(8):823-28. PMID: 4018779. [crossref]
19.
Bendon RW, Hommel AB. Maternal floor infarction in autoimmune disease: Two cases. Pediatric Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. 1996;16(2):293-98. PMID: 9025835. [crossref]
20.
Bane AL, Gillan JE. Massive perivillous fibrinoid causing recurrent placental failure. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2003;110(3):292-95. PMID: 12628270. [crossref]
21.
Clewell WH, Manchester DK. Recurrent maternal floor infarction: A preventable cause of fetal death. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1983;147(3):346-47. Doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(83)91130-4. PMID: 6624805. [crossref]
22.
Sebire NJ, Backos M, El Gaddal S, Goldin RD, Regan L. Placental pathology, antiphospholipid antibodies, and pregnancy outcome in recurrent miscarriage patients. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2003;101(2):258-63. Doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(02)02385-2. PMID: 12576248. [crossref]
23.
Romero R, Whitten A, Korzeniewski SJ, Than NG, Chaemsaithong P, Miranda J, et al. Maternal floor infarction/massive perivillous fibrin deposition: A manifestation of maternal antifetal rejection?. American Journal of Reproductive Immunology. 2013;70(4):285-98. Doi: 10.1111/aji.12143. Epub 2013 Aug 1. PMID: 23905710; PMCID: PMC4122226. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Robb JA, Benirschke K, Mannino F, Voland J. Intrauterine latent herpes simplex virus infection: II. Latent neonatal infection. Human Pathology. 1986;17(12):1210-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(86)80562-7. [crossref]
25.
Gersell DJ. Chronic villitis, chronic chorioamnionitis, and maternal floor infarction. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1993;10(3):251-66). PMID: 8210775.
26.
Vernof KK, Benirschke K, Kephart GM, Wasmoen TL, Gleich GJ. Maternal floor infarction: relationship to X cells, major basic protein, and adverse perinatal outcome. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1992;167(5):1355-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(11)91716-5. [crossref]
27.
Thummala MR, Raju TN, Langenberg P. Isolated single umbilical artery anomaly and the risk for congenital malformations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Pediatric Surgery. 1998;33(4):580-85. Doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(98)90320-7. PMID: 9574755. [crossref]
28.
Sepulveda W, Peek MJ, Hassan J, Hollingsworth J. Umbilical vein to artery ratio in fetuses with single umbilical artery. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1996;8(1):23-26. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1996.08010023.x. PMID: 8843614. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Dagklis T, Defigueiredo D, Staboulidou I, Casagrandi D, Nicolaides KH. Isolated single umbilical artery and fetal karyotype. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2010;36(3):291-25. Doi: 10.1002/uog.7717. PMID: 20549772. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Hua M, Odibo AO, Macones GA, Roehl KA, Crane JP, Cahill AG. Single umbilical artery and its associated findings. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2010;115(5):930-34. Doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da50ed. PMID: 20410765. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Bombrys AE, Neiger R, Hawkins S, Sonek J, Croom C, McKenna D, et al. Pregnancy outcome in isolated single umbilical artery. American Journal of Perinatology. 2008;25(04):239-42. Doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1061504. PMID: 18548398. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Viora E, Sciarrone A, Bastonero S, Errante G, Mortara G, Chiappa E, et al. Anomalies of the fetal venous system: A report of 26 cases and review of the literature. Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy. 2004;19(5):440-47. Doi: 10.1159/000078997. PMID: 15305101. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Aoki S, Hata T, Ariyuki Y, Makihara K, Hata K, Kitao M. Antenatal diagnosis of aberrant umbilical vessels. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1997;43(4):232-35. Doi: 10.1159/000291863. PMID: 9194620. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Karatza A, Tsamandas A, Varvarigou A, Davlouros P, Pavlou V, Mantagos S. Supernumerary umbilical vein in a hydropic neonate with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. 2011;30(3):173-76. Doi: 10.3109/15513815.2010.547557. Epub 2011 Feb 28. PMID: 21355676. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Wolman I, Gull I, Fait G, Amster R, Kupferminc MJ, Lessing JB, et al. Persistent right umbilical vein: Incidence and significance. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology: The Official Journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2002;19(6):562-64. Doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00678.x. PMID: 12047534. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Gorincour G, Droullé P, Guibaud L. Prenatal diagnosis of umbilicoportosystemic shunts: Report of 11 cases and review of the literature. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2005;184(1):163-68. Doi: 10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840163. PMID: 15615968. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Gillim DL, Hendricks CH. Holoacardius; review of the literature and case report. Obstet Gynecol. 1953;2(6):647-53. PMID: 13120037.
38.
Levi CS, Lyons EA, Martel MJ. Sonography of multifetal pregnancy. Diagnostic Ultrasound. 2005;2:1207-09.
39.
Hoyme HE, Higginbottom MC, Jones KL. Vascular etiology of disruptive structural defects in monozygotic twins. Pediatrics. 1981;67(2):288-91. PMID: 7243457. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Steffensen TS, Gilbert-Barness E, Spellacy W, Quintero RA. Placental pathology in trap sequence: Clinical and pathogenetic implications. Fetal and Pediatric Pathology. 2008;27(1):13-29. Doi: 10.1080/15513810801893389. PMID: 18568986. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Brouillet S, Dufour A, Prot F, Feige JJ, Equy V, Alfaidy N, et al. Influence of the umbilical cord insertion site on the optimal individual birth weight achievement. BioMed Research International. 2014;2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/341251. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53190.16643

Date of Submission: Nov 12, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 16, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Apr 21, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 13, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 03, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Apr 01, 2022 (22%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com