Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 98936

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC17 - EC20 Full Version

Analysis of Factors Influencing Length of Stay in Hospital among Burns Patients, Pertaining to Blood Transfusion- A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/56938.16594
Jeyaraj Ravishankar, Pothipillai Arumugam, M Chitra, Munusamy Sridevi

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Tirunelveli Medical College Hospital, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Transfusion Medicine, The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Immunohaematology and Blood Transfusion, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Munusamy Sridevi, Assistant Professor, Department of Immunohematology and Blood Transfusion, Government Stanley Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: msridevi1973@gmail.com

Abstract

#b#Introduction: Blood transfusion is an independent risk factor for death and perioperative infection in trauma patients. Hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) is an indicator of morbidity and can be used to assess wound healing in burns patients.

Aim: To analyse the factors influencing hospital length of stay in burns patients, with relevance to blood transfusion.

Materials and Methods: This was a cross-sectional study on burns patients admitted at burns ward, Government Kilpauk Medical College, Tamil Nadu, India, between September 2014 to August 2015. Patients with age more than 16 years with 15-40% Total Burnt Surface Area (TBSA) and had survived treatment were included after obtaining informed consent. Age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score, blood component transfusion, storage age of red cells, surgical procedures and wound infection were studied. Results were analysed using Chi-square test, Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Pearson correlation.

Results: Of the 122 burns patients studied, mean age was 35.38±12.93 years, 54.09% were males, mean LOS was 22.39±1.23 days, mean TBSA was 26.11±0.40%, mean APACHE II score was 5.02±0.06, 85 (69.67%) patients had received red blood cell transfusion, 59 (48.36%) underwent surgical procedures and 103 (84.43%) developed culture proven wound infections. APACHE II score at admission (r-value=0.260, p-value=0.004), blood transfusions (r-value=0.504, p-value <0.0001), surgical procedures (r-value=0.614, p-value <0.0001) and wound infections (r-value=0.468, p-value <0.0001), were the factors which significantly increased length of hospital stay. Age of the patient (r-value=0.102, p-value=0.265) and storage age of red blood cells (p-value=0.193) did not influence length of stay in burns patients.

Conclusion: Minimising wound infection by proper wound care and medications and rational use of blood components help in early healing of burns wound with reduced hospital stay.

Keywords

Age of red blood cells, Blood transfusion, Burns, Length of stay, Total burnt surface area

Burn injuries are a major public health problem due to its high mortality, morbidity and disability among young and middle aged adults. It may be accidental, suicidal or homicidal. Every 1% increase in Total Burnt Surface Area (TBSA) is significantly associated with 6% increase in risk of mortality (1),(2). As mortality in burns is decreasing due to early interventions; quality of life and functional status are recently being examined as parameters of burn care, of which hospital Length Of Stay (LOS) data are easy to collect and measure. The LOS data provide an indirect indication of morbidity and clinical complications, as well as cost of care (3).

Factors contributing to prolonged length of stay in hospital are delay in hospitalisation, elderly age and severity of burns, flame burns and requirement of blood transfusions (4),(5),(6). Simple models like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) scores are still relevant in developing countries, like India, and shows good discriminating ability between survivors and non survivors (7). In trauma patients, blood transfusion is an independent risk factor for death, perioperative infection, multiple organ failure and admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU). It has been well documented that blood transfusion within 24 hours of admission is an independent predictor of mortality and ICU length of stay (8).

The harm from Red Blood Cell (RBC) transfusion has been attributed to the ageing of blood and loss of normal RBC function due to storage lesion which leads to worsening microcirculation and nitric oxide bioavailability (8),(9),(10). Pettila V et al., observed that older RBC are associated with increased mortality in critically ill patients (11). But a review from the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB) technical manual and a Cochrane review did not find any association between clinical outcomes and different durations of blood storage (12),(13).

While large TBSA burn injury patients benefit from surgery, smaller burn injuries rest on a balance between risks and benefits (6). Immediate colonisation of burn wounds occur with patient’s normal skin flora with subsequent wound infection by gram negative flora (1),(14). The impaired immune system is unable to eradicate microbes and blood transfusion complicates this scenario by Transfusion Related Immunomodulation (TRIM), independent of injury severity (1),(15),(16). Hence, reducing transfusions can help benefit patient care (17),(18). Even though, Fresh Frozen Plasma (FFP) is advantageous in early fluid management in burn injury due to the presence of albumin and fibronectin, it is also associated with TRIM and its complications (19),(20).

The present study was undertaken to study the factors influencing hospital LOS in burns patients with respect to blood transfusions. The secondary objective was to study if blood stored for less than seven days reduced LOS in burns patients.

Material and Methods

This was a cross-sectional study conducted in patients admitted and treated in Burns Ward/ Burns ICU at Government Kilpauk Medical College Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. The patients admitted and treated between September 2014 to August 2015, who fulfilled the inclusion criteria (purposive sampling) were included in the study. The study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee of The Tamil Nadu Dr. M.G.R. Medical University (ECMGR0309034). Informed consent was obtained from patients/patient’s relatives for willingness to participate in the study.

Inclusion criteria: All the patients with age >16 years, TBSA of 15-40% and patients who survived the treatment were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Burns patients who were treated previously and admitted later for reconstructive surgeries and patients who were not willing to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The factors studied were age of the patient, APACHE II score at admission, blood component transfusion, storage age of red cells,
influence of transfusion on wound infection and surgical procedures performed on patients (21). Blood components transfused were non leukofiltered and non irradiated. The age of RBC unit was determined by subtracting the date of collection from the date of transfusion (11).

Statistical Analysis

Data entry and analysis were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Statistical analysis were done using Chi-square test (χ?suo?2) for categorical variables, analysis of variance and Pearson correlation (r) to find correlation. The p-value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

A total of 143 patients were followed from date of admission and 21 patients died during treatment. Data from 122 patients, who recovered successfully, were analysed. The mean age of the patients was 35.38±12.93 years; 66 (54.09%) were males. The mean length of hospital stay for all patients was 22.39±12.08 days (range was 6-63 days). While 121 patients received at least one blood component transfusion, a total of 85 patients had received red blood cell transfusion.

The age of the patient, TBSA and haemoglobin level at admission did not significantly influence LOS, while APACHE II score at admission did influence LOS (Table/Fig 1). As the number of blood transfusions increased, there was significant prolongation of LOS (r-value=0.495, p-value <0.05).

The mean LOS of patient transfused with RBC was 26.39 days while those who did not receive RBC transfusion was 13.19 days (r-value=0.504, p-value <0.0001). The mean LOS in patients receiving RBC units stored for ≤14 days was 22.03±9.15 days while mean LOS in patients who received RBC units stored for >14 days was 23.04±10.89 days (p-value=0.727) (Table/Fig 2). The mean LOS in patients receiving RBC units stored for ≤7 days was 19.6±13.1 days while mean LOS in patients who received RBC units stored for >7 days was 23.33±5.93 days (p-value=0.193) (Table/Fig 2). Fresh frozen plasma transfusions in the burns patient and LOS were negatively correlated (r-value=0.422,p-value=0.001) and that the mean length of stay for patients transfused with FFP (n=114/122) (22.03±11.37 days) was significantly shorter than those who were not transfused (n=8/122) (27.37±20.13 days).

Culture-proven wound infections developed in 103 (84.42%) patients. The most common microbes grown in cultures from the burn injury site are given in (Table/Fig 3). The mean LOS for burns patients with culture-proven wound infection (24.8±11.5 days) was significantly longer than those patients without wound infection (9.3±3.2 days). Mean LOS of burns patients who had received red cell transfusion and developed wound infection was higher than patients who developed wound infection but did not receive blood transfusions (p-value=0.039) (Table/Fig 4).

A total of 59 patients underwent surgical procedures, while 63 were treated conservatively. Escharatomy was the most common surgery (n=59) while 28 patients had eschar removal and split skin grafting. Six patients underwent amputation. The mean LOS of patients who underwent surgical procedures was 30.02±14.93 days, while patients who were treated conservatively had a mean LOS of 15.24±8.33 days (p-value <0.05). Mean LOS of burns patients who underwent surgical procedures and had received RBC transfusion was significantly higher than patients who had surgical procedures but did not receive blood transfusions (p-value <0.05) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

With better accessibility to tertiary care with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) vehicles and long strides in burns injury care, more burns victims are surviving and so quality of life parameters are taking prominence over mortality parameters. Length of hospitalisation is one of the easily monitored and accessible parameters, which gives a better view on burns care and patient survival. When multivariate analysis is performed, exclusion of non survivors from analysis can help identify prognostic factors for hospital length of stay (20). Thus, this study included data only from patients who were successfully discharged from hospital after treatment and deaths were excluded.

The mean LOS of burns patients in the present study (n=122) was 22.39±12.08 days, with a range between 6-63 days. The study by Gupta AK et al., showed a higher mean length of stay of 57 days while Bain J et al., showed a lower mean length of stay (2),(22).

The mean age of burns patients in the present study was (35.38±12.93 years) with a range between 16-81 years. This was similar to the study by Gupta AK et al., but Hashmi M and Kamal R, showed a lesser mean age while Lu RP et al., showed a higher mean age of burns patients (22),(23),(24). Burns were more common in males (54%) in the present study which was similar to studies by Gupta AK et al., but other studies by Bain J et al., and Chakraborty S et al., showed burns to be more common in females (2),(22),(25).

In the present study, age of burns patient did not influence LOS. This was similar to the result obtained by Posluszny JA Jr et al., who did not find correlation between age and LOS (18). But in contrast, the studies by Hussain A and Dunn KW, and Edgar DW et al., showed that advancing age was a significant factor for prolonged LOS (3),(4).

In the present study, total burnt surface area was taken as 1540% because, below 15% TBSA burns, hospitalisations are rarely necessary and in burns above 40%, mortality risk is higher [5,26]. Hussain A and Dunn KW, in their review have shown that percentage of TBSA was a better predictor of hospital LOS (3). As the present study results show, the restricted TBSA of 15-40% did not significantly correlate to LOS. Hence, the confounding factor of TBSA burns was overcome and the significance of other factors on LOS was absolute.

The APACHE II score which was developed as a mortality predictor also doubles up as a morbidity predictor. As the percentage of TBSA has been restricted in the present study, the APACHE II score obtained was low (maximum score 15). Still APACHE II score showed a positive correlation to LOS which was statistically significant.

In the present study, it was observed that there was significant prolongation of mean hospital LOS in transfused burns patients when compared to non transfused burns patients, irrespective of storage age of red cells (26.39 vs 13.19 days). The results were similar to those obtained by Neamt¸u MC et al., (31.3 vs 10.8 days), Vincent JL et al., (7.2 vs 2.6 ICU days) and Palmieri TL et al., (48.8 vs 13.5 days) (10),(17),(27).

In the present study, the mean LOS was significantly shorter for patients transfused with FFP when compared to those patients who were not transfused with FFP. This result was in contrast to the study by Sarani B et al., who showed that LOS was prolonged in critically ill patients who were transfused with FFP (20). This finding should not be interpreted as FFP was beneficial for burns, but rather it signifies the beneficial effect of colloids in the late fluid management of burns.

Many observational studies and clinical trials have tried to prove the deleterious effects of increasing storage age of red cells but none have given conclusive results. While Pettila V et al., showed increased mortality in the critically ill patients transfused with older RBC; AABB technical manual and the Cochrane review 2015 have not found any clear differences in clinical outcomes between fresher and older RBC (11),(12),(13). The present study did not find any significant prolongation of mean hospital LOS among two groups (RBCs stored for less than 14 days vs. RBCs stored for more than 14 days).

This study also evaluated if RBCs stored for less than seven days had any significant advantage over RBCs stored for more than seven days. This is a practice followed by clinicians who order fresh blood for transfusion in critically ill patients. There was no significant reduction in LOS in patients receiving RBCs stored for less than seven days (p=0.193). But there was significant prolongation of mean hospital LOS in transfused burns patients as the number of blood transfusions increased (r-value=0.504, p-value <0.0001). This was similar to the results by Palmieri TL et al. who found that burns patients who received fewer blood transfusions had a better survival (27).

In the present study, many (n=103/122) burn patients had culture positive wound infections, of which Staphylococcus species were the most common organism cultured in the first week of admission. From second week of admission onwards, gram negative organisms including Klebsiella species and Pseudomonas species were cultured more frequently. These results are similar to the other studies by Church D et al. and Khaliq MF et al., who showed gram positive organisms in the first 48 hours by colonisation from skin flora and gram negative organisms after five to seven days of burn injury by colonisation from enteral flora (1),(14).

In the present study, wound infection showed a significant association with prolonged stay in hospital. In contrast, Khaliq MF et al., reported that colonisation of wounds by micro-organisms did not prolong hospital stay (14). It was also noted that patients who received blood transfusions showed an increased the risk of wound infection and thus prolonged LOS, which was similar to the results by Palmieri TL et al., (Spearman’s rank correlation=0.647, p-value <0.001) (27).

In the present study, patients who underwent surgical procedures received more blood transfusions than those treated conservatively. These results were similar to the findings by Posluszny JA Jr et al., who showed that transfusions significantly correlated with number of operative procedures (18). Such patients undergoing surgical procedures had prolonged LOS, as expected, when compared to those patients treated conservatively. These results are similar to those obtained in the study by Hussain A and Dunn KW, and Gupta AK et al., (3),(22).

Thus, the factors significantly influencing hospital LOS of burn patients in the present study include APACHE II score at admission, blood transfusions, surgical procedures and wound infections.

Limitation(s)

Burn patients with total burnt surface area more than 40% were not included in this study.

Conclusion

The present study highlights some of the factors significantly influencing hospital length of stay of burns patients. A quick APACHE II score check at admission, minimising wound infection by proper wound care and medications, rational use of blood components and judicious surgical procedures go a long way in early wound healing of burns wound with reduced hospital stay. Fresh red blood cells did not help in reducing length of stay in the present patient population. So, blood transfusion services should not be unnecessarily burdened with request for fresher blood components.

References

1.
Church D, Elsayed S, Reid O, Winston B, Lindsay R. Burn wound infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2006;19(2):403-34.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
. Bain J, Lal S, Baghel VS, Yedalwar V, Gupta R, Singh AK. Decadorial of a burn center in Central India. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2014;5(1):116-22. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Hussain A, Dunn KW. Predicting length of stay in thermal burns: A systematic review of prognostic factors. Burns 2013;39(7):1331-40.[crossref][PubMed]
4.
Edgar DW, Homer L, Phillips M, Gurfinkel R, Rea S, Wood FM. The influence of advancing age on quality of life and rate of recovery after treatment for burn. Burns. 2013;39(6):1067-72.[crossref][PubMed]
5.
Gul A, Alam SI, Sharif G. Mortality in above 40% thermal burns patients. Journal of Surgery Pakistan (International). 2011;16(4):174-78.
6.
Lim J, Liew S, Chan H, Jackson T, Burrows S, Edgar DW, et al. Is the length of time in acute burn surgery associated with poorer outcomes? Burns. 2014;40(2):235-40. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Piacentini E, Ferrer C. Scoring prognostic system: To predict or not to predict. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012;78:149-50.
8.
Malone DL, Dunne J, Tracy JK, Putnam AT, Scalea TM, Napolitano LM. Blood transfusion, independent of shock severity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. J Trauma. 2003;54(5):898-05; discussion 905-07.[crossref][PubMed]
9.
Dejam A, Malley BE, Feng M, Cismondi F, Park S, Samani S, et al. The effect of age and clinical circumstances on the outcome of red blood cell transfusion in critically ill patients. Crit Care. 2014;18(4):487.[crossref][PubMed]
10.
Neamt¸ u MC, Pârvu A, Pârva? nescu H, Neamt¸ u LR, Vrabete M. Could stored blood transfusions (SBT) alter the mechanisms implied in wound healing, in burned patients? Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011;52(2):599-04.
11.
Pettilä V, Westbrook AJ, Nichol AD, Bailey MJ, Wood EM, Syres G, et al. Blood observational study investigators for anzics clinical trials group. Age of red blood cells and mortality in the critically ill. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R116.[crossref][PubMed]
12.
Fung MK, Grossman BJ, Hillyer CD, Westhoff CM. Chapter 20 Hemotherapy decisions. AABB Technical Manual. 18 Edition. 2014; p503.
13.
Brunskill SJ, Wilkinson KL, Doree C, Trivella M, Stanworth S. Transfusion of fresher versus older red blood cells for all conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(5):CD010801.
14.
Khaliq MF, Noorani MM, Siddiqui UA, Al Ibran E, Rao MH. Factors associated with duration of hospitalization and outcome in burns patients: A cross sectional study from Government Tertiary Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. Burns. 2013;39(1):150-54.[crossref][PubMed]
15.
Muszynski JA, Spinella PC, Cholette JM, Acker JP, Hall MW, Juffermans NP, et al.; Pediatric Critical Care Blood Research Network (Blood Net). Transfusionrelated immunomodulation: Review Of the literature and implications for pediatric critical illness. Transfusion. 2017;57(1):195-06. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, et al. Transfusion thresholds and other strategies for guiding allogeneic red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;10(10):CD002042. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;12:CD002042.[crossref][PubMed]
17.
Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, Gattinoni L, Thijs L, Webb A, et al.; ABC (Anemia and Blood Transfusion in Critical Care) Investigators. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288(12):1499-07.[crossref][PubMed]
18.
Posluszny JA Jr, Conrad P, Halerz M, Shankar R, Gamelli RL. Classifying transfusions related to the anemia of critical illness in burn patients. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):26-31.[crossref][PubMed]
19.
Rudmann SV. Textbook of Blood banking and Transfusion medicine. Second edition. Elsevier Saunders. 2006; Pp. 465-67.
20.
Sarani B, Dunkman WJ, Dean L, Sonnad S, Rohrbach JI, Gracias VH. Transfusion of fresh frozen plasma in critically ill surgical patients is associated with an increased risk of infection. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(4):1114-18.[crossref][PubMed]
21.
Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-29.[crossref][PubMed]
22.
Gupta AK, Uppal S, Garg R, Gupta A, Pal R. A clinico-epidemiologic study of 892 patients with burn injuries at a tertiary care hospital in Punjab, India. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2011;4(1):07-11.[crossref][PubMed]
23.
Hashmi M, Kamal R. Management of patients in a dedicated burns intensive care unit (BICU) in a developing country. Burns. 2013;39:493-500.[crossref][PubMed]
24.
Lu RP, Lin FC, Ortiz-Pujols SM, Adams SD, Whinna HC, Cairns BA, et al. Blood utilization in patients with burn injury and association with clinical outcomes (CME). Transfusion. 2013;53(10):2212-21; quiz 2211.[crossref][PubMed]
25.
Chakraborty S, Bisoi S, Chattopadhyay D, Mishra R, Bhattacharya N, Biswas B. A study on demographic and clinical profile of burn patients in an Apex Institute of West Bengal. Indian J Public Health. 2010;54(1):27-29.[crossref][PubMed]
26.
The Clinical Use of Blood in Medicine, Obstetrics, Paediatrics, Surgery & Anaesthesia, Trauma & Burns. WHO document WHO/BTS/99. 2-337p.
27.
Palmieri TL, Caruso DM, Foster KN, Cairns BA, Peck MD, Gamelli RL, et al.; American Burn Association Burn Multicenter Trials Group. Effect of blood transfusion on outcome after major burn injury: A multicnter study. Crit CareMed. 2006;34(6):1602-07.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/56938.16594

Date of Submission: apr 06, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 19, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 17, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 15, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 26, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 16, 2022 (15%)
Excluding the plagiarism from repository-tnmgrmu.ac.in

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com