Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 85600

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC13 - EC16 Full Version

Clinico-pathological and Genomic Characteristics among Children with SARS-CoV-2 Infection


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/55401.16592
Vivek Gupta, Vinod Scaria, Anurag Srivastava, Akash Raja, Shivani Kalhan

1. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology; Incharge, Molecular Diagnostics and Research Laboratory, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2. Senior Scientist, CSIR Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR-IGIB), New Delhi, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. 4. Tutor, Department of Pathology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Pathology, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Vivek Gupta,
Associate Professor, Department of Pathology; Incharge, Molecular Diagnostics and Research Laboratory, Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: drvivekgupta1979@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: There is inadequate information on infections with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children. Their clinical, as well as pathological correlation, is poorly understood. In India, children and adolescents account for 12% of all Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases reported. Children accounted for roughly 11% of those impacted globally last year. However, this year, we are seeing around 20-40% of youngsters in positive instances over the world. Even babies and infants are testing positive for COVID-19, although their illness is under control and seldom becomes fatal. Children aged 5 to 12 years, on the other hand, are at a higher risk.

Aim: To study the clinical, pathological and genomic characteristics among children with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted among 48 paediatric positive patients for SARS-CoV-2 at Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, and CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India, from 1st April 2021 to 31st May 2021. The laboratory testing was done by the real-time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) method. The patients were classified as mild, moderate, severe, or asymptomatic. Their clinical and pathological findings were recorded in the case sheet. Genomic analyses were done for identifying the genetic variant in the nine selected samples. Data entry and analysis were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and the t-test was used for continuous variables.

Results: The study group has median age of 12 years. Male:Female ratio was 2:3. Most children had acquired infection from the community and 30% had the moderate illness and were admitted. Serum Glutamic-Oxalacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) were raised in six patients. Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) was raised in 21 patients and bilirubin was raised in two patients. The average duration of hospitalisation was six days (range 2-13 days). No mortality among the 48 paediatric patients studied was identified in the hospital. Delta variant (B.1.617.2) was identified in seven patients with D614, P681R, L452R mutations and B.1.617.2 was identified in two patients. Delta variant was present in the paediatric patients, but it did not prolong the hospital stay or cause mortality.

Conclusion: The findings of the study suggest that children may be a potential source of infection in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic while having an asymptomatic to mild illness.

Keywords

Coronavirus disease 2019, Delta variant, Liver enzymes, Monoclonal antibodies, Severe acute respiratory syndrome virus 2, Spike protein gene

The World Health Organisation (WHO) announced a pandemic on 11th March 2020, when a novel coronavirus dubbed Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) originated in China in late December 2019 and expanded worldwide (1). As of May 2021, a total of 25,07,15,502 million instances of the new respiratory disease, Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) had been reported worldwide, with 50,62,106 deaths (1).

For the first time, Chan JFW et al., described human-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 when a family member without travel history to Wuhan, China, got infected few days after interaction with kinfolk who had returned from Wuhan (2). There is inadequate information on infections with the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in children and their clinical, as well as pathological correlation is poorly understood. In India, children and adolescents account for 12% of all COVID-19 cases reported. Children aged ≤12 years, on the other hand, are at a higher risk as they are not vaccinated. Only few studies have been published on pediatric population and highlight either clinical or genomic data (3),(4). In light of this continuing COVID-19 epidemic, research of their clinical, pathological and genomic characteristics is critical for guiding screening, containment, and prevention efforts. The study focused on the clinico-pathological and genomic characteristics among children with SARS-CoV-2 infection in India.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Molecular Diagnostics and Research Laboratory at Government Institute of Medical Sciences, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, and CSIR-Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology, New Delhi, India, from 1st April 2021 to 31st May 2021. Total 48 paediatric patients (≤18 years) presenting with symptoms of COVID-19 and diagnosed positive on real-time Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR) for SARS-CoV-2 were enrolled in the present study. The study protocol was explained to the guardians or parents of the children participating in study. Their written consent was taken. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethical permission was obtained from both Institutes (GIMS/IEC/HR/2020/02).

A detailed history was taken from the parents and children were examined for signs of COVID-19. Laboratory investigations included- routine testing of paediatric patients for complete haemogram, renal function test, liver function test and measurement of erythrocyte sedimentation rate. Also Interleukin (IL6), D-dimer, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) were tested and chest radiograph was also done, as advised by the physician. In the absence of symptoms, asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 cases were characterised as individuals with a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR. The COVID-19 cases were identified by a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR and the presence of compatible signs and symptoms. COVID-19 cases were classified, as mild, if they would be handled in an outpatient environment, moderate if they would be admitted to the hospital and have a favourable outcome, and severe, if they would be admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) or have a fatal outcome. Fever was the only symptom of a febrile episode. The emergence of atleast one respiratory symptom was defined as an acute respiratory infection like cough, sore throat, dyspnoea. The onset of fever, weakness, headache, and/or myalgias in conjunction with cough, dyspnoea, and/or pharyngeal discomfort was characterised as Influenza-Like Illness (ILI). A case of respiratory infection in a patient having radiographic or computer tomography findings consistent with pneumonia was characterised as pneumonia. Persons under the age of ≤18 years shall be considered children. They were classified as mild, moderate, severe, or asymptomatic based on World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria. (Living guidance for clinical management of COVID-19. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/349321/WHO-2019-nCoV-clinical-2021.2-eng.pdf. Accessed July 01,2022).

Procedure

Sampling for SARS-CoV-2 testing: Samples using swabs from nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal areas were taken as per standard protocol and put in a 3 mL sterile viral transport medium tube. Cold chain was maintained for all samples. Samples were processed immediately and stored at -80?Sup?0C after processing.

Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Isolation: RNA extraction was carried out in a pre-amplification environment in a Biosafety level 2 facility as per established protocol. RNA isolation was done by standard protocol using the MagMAXTM with commercial Mag MAXCORE Nucleic Acid Purification kit (MMkit) (5). Protocol design and validation MM kit protocol was done as per protocol established by Lázaro-Perona F et al., (5).

SARS-CoV-2 detection: The SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA detection was done using a multiplex RT-PCR kit (2019 nCoVAssay Kit v1). The kit targets the Orf 1ab gene, spike protein gene, nucleocapsid gene and human RNa-seP gene. All RT-PCR assays were performed in QuantStudioTM 6 Flex RT-PCR (Applied Biosystems). The reaction mixture (6.25 μL ofmaster mix+1.25 μL of the nCoV assay+1.25 μL of RNAse P assay +11.25 μL molecular grade water) was prepared volume 20 μL. To this 5 μL of nucleic acid was added. The final reaction volume was 25 μL. A positive control (1 μLnCoV Control+4 μL molecular grade water) and a negative control using (5 μL of molecular grade water) were used with each run. The reaction settings had uracil-N-glycosylase incubation at 25?Sup?0C (2 min), reverse transcription at 50?Sup?0C (15 min), activation at 95?Sup?0C (2 min), denaturation at 95?Sup?0C (3 seconds), annealing and extension for 40 cycles was done at 60?Sup?0C (30 seconds per cycle). Signal in FAM{6-carboxyfluorescein (6-FAM)}, before 37 cycles was taken as positive for SARS-CoV-2, Signal in VIC (2'-chloro-7'phenyl-1,4-dichloro-6-carboxy-fluorescein) before 37 cycles was taken as positive for internal control of SARS-CoV-2. A signal detected in VIC, but not in FAM was considered invalid results.

Library preparation, genome sequencing and data processing were done 20% randomly selected samples using protocols earlier established (6),(7),(8),(9). Phylogenetic analysis were also done using protocols earlier established by Rambaut A et al., (7). Case detection for SARS-CoV-2 infection were reported to the Indian Council of Medical Research online portal and lab portals of state (https://labs.upcovid19tracks.in/). Data was collected from the Medical Record Department.

Statistical Analysis

Data entry and analysis were performed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Chi-square test was used for categorical variables and the t-test was used for continuous variables.

Results

A total of 48 paediatric patient, hospitalised due to COVID-19 illness were taken for the study. The study group has median age of 12 years. Male:Female ratio was 2:3. Most children had acquired infection from the community and moderate illness i.e, were admitted. Fever was the most common presenting symptom [Table/Fig-1,(Table/Fig 2). Liver enzymes like Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase (SGOT) and Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (SGPT) was raised in six patient. Serum Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP) was done in 35 out of 48 paediatric patients and was raised in 21 patients. C-Reactive Protein (CRP) was done in 15 paediatric patients and was raised in two only of them. D-dimer was raised in two out of seven paediatric patients (most of the parents did not show interest in sampling their children for the test as the test was done only once a week due to limited resources and kit availability). Interleukin 6 (IL-6) was raised in one paediatric patient. Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) was raised in nine out of 11 paediatric patients (11/48 were age less than 2 years and sufficient blood could not be collected for the ESR by manual method. Out of remaining 37 paediatric patients, only those who had both fever and cough were attempted for ESR from the amount of blood collected). Platelets were reduced in one out of 48 patients. Bilirubin was raised in two paediatric patients. The average duration of hospitalisation was six days (range 2-13 days). No mortality among the 48 paediatric patients studied was identified in the hospital.

Genomic analysis was done for randomly 20% of the patients which was taken as representative of subjects. Sequencing was not possible for all the positive patients and was neither indicated for any clinical reason so was not done. Genomic sequencing was done in nine paediatric patients randomly selected. Substitution in spike protein gene were found in seven patient. The substitutions were at T19R, G142D, 156del, 157del, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N. These paediatric patients with the above mutations were identified as Delta variant (B.1.617.2). Delta variant is designated as a variant of concern, and was identified for the first time in India.

Delta variant was identified in India for the first time. It has following changes in spike protein of virus T19R, G142D, 156del, 157del, R158G, L452R, T478K, D614G, P681R, D950N. It has increased transmissibility asstronger affection to the Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptors. These mutations cause reduction in monoclonal antibodies treatment by its neutralisation. It is classified as a variant of concern.

The other two out of nine paediatric patients had kappa variant (B.1.617.1) with substitution in spike proteins gene at T951I, G142D, E154K, L452R, E484Q, D614G, P681R, Q1071H. (Table/Fig 3) showing phylogenetic graph of seven patient SARS-CoV-2 classified as delta variant.

Discussion

The study reported the clinical, pathological and genomic characteristics in-hospital course and outcome of the 48 paediatric patients admitted to a COVID-19-dedicated hospital from North India.

In the present study mode of transmission was community-based in most of the children admitted this is in accordance with other studies conducted by Yonker LM et al., (8). It is important to identify children with COVID-19 illness early, as they can be quarantined for infection control.

The present study had 12 patients with underlying conditions in form of hepatic, neurological, and respiratory involvement. The underlying co-morbidities worsen the clinical outcome in adults and the same is being observed in paediatric patients. Two patient had raised bilirubin levels due to neonatal jaundice (nine days and 13 days) but they did not have raised SGOT or SGPT. Raised bilirubin in the present study could be attributed to normal physiological phenomena in neonates born prematurely.

Study conducted by Ludvigsson JF, reported milder disease in children (9), however, this study had most of the cases as moderate illness. This could be due to the reason that the present study was conducted in hospital and the study by Ludvigsson JF, was conducted in community based settings.

Liver enzymes AST and ALT were elevated in 12.5% patients in the present study which is in accordance with the study conducted by Lazova S et al., wherein AST and/or ALT was raised in 12% cases only (10). This involvement of liver in SARS-CoV-2 infection is due to its binding to ACE receptors in bile duct epithelial cells according to study by Feng G et al., in 2020 (11). However, this has not been scientifically proven in children. The liver involvement in uncomplicated COVID-19 cases is temporary and usually resolves without treatment (12). A study conducted by Zou YH et al., liver involvement in COVID-19 affects mainly 0-3 years as compared to the older children. Liver immaturity is perhaps the suspected reason for it (13).

The mean duration of hospital stay was six days only which suggests that children had a fast recovery from SARS-CoV-2 infection. It could be attributed to the fact that in children there is low expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptors,Yonker LM et al., (8). The SARS-CoV-2 enters host cell via ACE2 receptors expressed on human organs and the receptors have reduced expression in children (8),(14). Its expression increases with age.

Genomic sequencing of nine patients was a key feature of the present study. There is a scarcity of published data related to genomic sequencing in the paediatric patient. In the present study, nine patients have different mutations identified in SARS-CoV-2 genome. They had mutations in D614G, P681R, L452R that have clinical implications. Mutations D614G- moderate effect on transmissibility, increase infectivity and reduce spike protein shedding, L452R- Mutation on Spike protein Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD) increases binding affinity to human ACE2 receptor and decreases identification capability of the human immune system. It is also called as double mutant. The P681R (proline to arginine substitution at 681 position of spike protein) is reported to boost the cell infectivity of B.1.617.2 variant by helping cleavage of the S precursor protein to the functional S1/S2 configuration (15).

Limitation(s)

Some of the investigation could not be performed at that particular point of time in pandemic during second wave on all the patients in the laboratory, due to limited availability of kits and resources.

Conclusion

Based on the above clinical, pathological and genomic data we have learned more about the impact of SARS-CoV-2 on children. Variant of concern is present in paediatric patient, but it did not prolong the hospital stay or cause mortality. The study suggests that children with SARS-CoV-2 infection may be a potential source of spreading it in pandemic, even though they have a milder disease or are asymptomatic and must be treated timely.

References

1.
World Health Organization website. Corona virus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. Available at: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019. Accessed November 11, 2021.
2.
Chan JFW, Yuan S, Kok KH, To KKW, Chu H, Yang J, et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel corona virus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet. 2020;395:514-23. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Du W, Yu J, Wang H, Zhang X, Zhang S, Li Q, et al. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in children with adults in Shandong Province, China. Infection. 2020;48:445-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Zhen-Dong Y, Gao-Jun Z, Run-Ming J, Sheng-Zhi L, Zong-Qi D, Xiong X, et al. Clinical and transmission dynamics characteristics of 406 children with coronavirus disease 2019 in China: A review. J Infect. 2020;81(2):E11-E15. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Lázaro-Perona F, Rodriguez-Antolín C, Alguacil-Guillén M, Gutiérrez-Arroyo A, Mingorance J, García-Rodriguez J, et al. Evaluation of two automated low-cost RNA extraction protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(2):e0246302. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Bhoyar RC, Jain A, Sehgal P, Divakar MK, Sharma D, Imran M, et al. High throughput detection and genetic epidemiology of SARS-CoV-2 using COVIDSeq next generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2021;16(20: e0247115.
7.
Rambaut A, Holmes EC, Toole AO, Hill V, McCrone JT, Ruis C, et al. A dynamic nomenclature proposal for SARS-CoV-2 lineages to assist genomic epidemiology. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5(11):1403-07. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Yonker LM, Neilan AM, Bartsch Y, Patel AB, Regan J, Arya P, et al. Pediatric Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2): Clinical presentation, infectivity, and immune responses. J Pediatr. 2020;227:45-52. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ludvigsson JF. Systemic review of COVID 19 in children shows milder cases and better prognosis than adults. Acta Paediatric. 2020;109:1088-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Lazova S, Alexandrova T, Stefanova NG, Atanasov K, Tzotcheva I, Velikova T. Liver involvement in children with COVID 19 and multisystem inflammatory syndrome: A single-center Bulgarian observational study. Microorganisms. 2021;09(9):01-17. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Feng G, Zheng KI, Yan QQ, Rios RS, Targher G, Byrne CD, et al. COVID-19 and liver dysfunction: Current insights and emergent therapeutic strategies. J Clin Transl Hepatol. 2020;8(1):18-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Zhang C, Shi L, Wang F. Liver injury in COVID-19: Management and challenges. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(5):428-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Zhou YH, Zheng KI, Targher G, Byrne CD, Zheng MH. Abnormal liver enzymes in children and infants with COVID-19: A narrative review of case-series studies. Pediatr Obes. 2020;15(12):e12723. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Ni W, Yang X, Yang D, Bao Z, Li R, Xiao Y, et al. Role of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) in COVID-19. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):422. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
World Health Organization website: Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. (2021). Accessed: 24/10/2021: https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV- 2-variants/.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/55401.16592

Date of Submission: Feb 02, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 22, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Apr 07, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 02, 2022
• Manual Googling: Apr 06, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 18, 2022 (24%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com