Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 140804

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC01 - EC07 Full Version

Extra Nodal Non Hodgkin’s Lymphomas using Immunohistochemistry from a Tertiary Care Centre, Andhra Pradesh, India- A Retrospective Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51365.16561
N Rukmangadha, Sivakumar Vulava, C Suresh Praveen

1. Professor, Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Consultant Pathologist, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amara Hospital, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sivakumar Vulava,
#5, Old Assistant Professors Quarters, Block 1, Svims Campus, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: sivavulava@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Primary Extra nodal Lymphomas (pENL) are a group of lymphomas arising from tissues other than lymph nodes and even sites which normally contain no lymphoid tissue. Over the past 25 years pENLs have shown a rapid increase in incidence. The pENLs can originate from almost any anatomical site such as the gastrointestinal tract (most common), head and neck (waldeyer’s ring, nose/paranasal sinuses/nasopharynx, salivary glands, etc.,), skin, Central Nervous System (CNS) etc. The definition of Extra nodal Lymphoma (ENL), particularly in the presence of both nodal and extra nodal disease remains a controversial issue. To categorise these entities, different criteria were proposed by different authors.

Aim: To study the occurrence of extra nodal non hodgkin’s lymphomas in different sites/organs using Immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study carried out in the Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, over a period of seven years six months starting from January 2010 to July 2017. Data was retrieved from the medical records and paraffin blocks were retrieved from the stores. All cases of extra nodal primary lymphomas were included in the study. All cases were classified based upon morphologic and immunophenotypic criteria according to World Health Organisation (WHO) 2008 classification. The distribution of primary extra nodal lymphomas among different age groups with mean age of occurrence was noted. Distribution of pENLs among male and female population with male to female ratio was calculated. The percentage of different sub-types of ENL and the Immunohistochemistry (IHC) markers in each subtype of ENL were calculated.

Results: In this retrospective study, a total of 317 newly diagnosed lymphoma cases were included. Among them, 79 cases were pENL. A total of 77 (24.29%) cases of primary extra nodal non hodgkin’s lymphomas were included in the study. The age of the patients ranged from 4-81 years with mean age of 48.42 years, with male predominance (M:F-1.85:1). Gastrointestinal Tract (GIT) (35/77-45.45%) was the most common site, followed by head and neck (16/77-20.77%), mediastinum (4/77-5.19%), kidney (4/77-5.19%) were the common sites of occurrence of primary extra nodal NHLs. In the GIT, stomach was the most commonly involved site (24/35) followed by the small intestine (5/35), colon and anal canal (3/35) and caecum region (3/35). The Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) was the most common histological type observed in 51/77 (66.23%), followed by Peripheral T-cell Lymphoma- Not Otherwise Specified (PTL-NOS) were observed in 14/77 (18.18%) cases, and extra nodal marginal zone lymphoma of Mucosa-associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT) type seen in 9/77 (11.68%) cases.

Conclusion: pENLs are a diverse group of haemato-lymphoid malignancies, the incidence of which is low in India compared to rest of the world, the prognosis of which depends on the extra nodal site. The diagnosis is challenging due to the morphological mimics and varied clinical presentation and that is the reason, all should keep in mind the possibility of pENLs.

Keywords

Gastrointestinal tract, Head and neck, Lymphoma B-cell, Lymphoma T-cell, Mucosa associated lymphoid tissue

The primary Extra nodal Lymphomas (pENL) are a group of lymphomas that arise in different extra nodal organs and tissues where lymphoid tissue is not seen. A 25% of lymphomas are extra nodal in origin (1). The pENLs can be diagnostically challenging due to their morphological mimics, molecular alteration and clinical presentations. Over the past 25 years, pENLs have shown a rapid increase in incidence (2) especially in Central Nervous System (CNS) (3). Gastrointestinal tract and skin, which can be attributed to immunosuppression due to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection or immunosuppressive treatments, infections such as Helicobacter pylori, Chlamydia psittaci, Borrelia burgdorferi and Campylobacter jejuni, autoimmune disorders and environmental factors. The trend of increase in incidence is seen particularly in developing countries like the middle-east and far-east (4).

The type of ENL varies from one site to another. They are classified into primary and secondary. Lymphomas originating from the non lymphnodal tissue are termed as pENL, whereas secondary lymphomas present first in the nodes and subsequently involves the extra nodal sites (5),(6).

The pENLs can originate from almost any anatomical site such as the gastrointestinal tract (most common), head and neck (waldeyer’s ring, nose/paranasal sinuses/nasopharynx, salivary glands, etc.,), skin, CNS, bone, thyroid, breast, rarely adrenal, pancreas and genitourinary tract (7). The definition of ENL, particularly in the presence of both nodal and extra nodal disease remains a controversial issue. To categorise these entities, different criteria were proposed by different authors (6),(8),(9).

According to Dawson’s criteria lymphoma is said to be primarily extra nodal if: 1) Absence of palpable superficial lymph nodes on first physical examination; 2) Absence of mediastinal lymphadenopathy detected by plain chest x-ray; 3) Dominant lesion at the extra nodal site; 4) Involvement of lymph nodes in the vicinity of the primary lesion; and 5) White Blood Cell count (WBC) count within the normal range (8). Literature on extra nodal NHLs originating in almost every organ of the body is widely available, reports on pENLs as a group are limited (6).

The aim of the present study was to study the occurrence of extra nodal non Hodgkin’s lymphomas in different sites/organs and to subtype the extra nodal NHL using IHC markers.

Material and Methods

This was a retrospective study carried out in the Department of Pathology, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical sciences (SVIMS), Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, over a period of seven years six months starting from January 2010 to July 2017 approved by Ethical Committee with SVIMS (IEC No.794). Analysis was done in 2019. A total of 317 newly diagnosed lymphoma cases were retrieved, among them 79 were pENLs.

Inclusion criteria: The liberal definition of primary extra nodal NHLs proposed by Krol ADG et al., was adopted that includes all patients who present with NHL that apparently originated at an extra nodal site, even in the presence of disseminated disease, as long as the extra nodal component was clinically dominant (6). The tonsil and Waldeyer’s ring were included as an extra nodal site although many respects, they could be considered of nodal origin. There has been debate on whether they should be considered as nodal or extra nodal lymphoma sites but they have historically been included among the extra nodal types (10),(11).

Exclusion criteria: All the histopathologically diagnosed nodal lymphomas and nodal lymphomas with extra nodal involvement and plasmacytomas were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

Data was retrieved from the medical r ecords and paraffin blocks were retrieved from the stores. Paraffin embedded Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained tissue sections were analysed to reach at a morphological diagnosis. The IHC analysis was performed manually on the paraffin embedded tissue sections by using a panel of monoclonal antibodies (peroxidase-antiperoxidase method). Antigen retrieval was done by pretreatment of paraffin sections by heating in micro Owen in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0) (12). The panel of antibodies used for IHC included Pan Cytokeratin (pan CK), Leukocyte Common Antigen (LCA), Cluster of Differentiation cells (CD)3, CD5, CD19, CD20, CD23, CD10, CD43, CD15, CD30, CD99, CD56, CD138, B-cell lymphoma (Bcl) 2, Bcl6, Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (Tdt), Endomysial Antibodies (EMA) and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-1 (ALK-1). Paraffin tissue blocks, H&E stained section slides and IHC slides were retrieved and reviewed by three pathologists in double blinded manner. All cases were classified based upon morphologic and immunophenotypic criteria according to World Health Organisation (WHO) 2008 classification (13).

Statistical Analysis

All the details were recorded in the study proforma. Data was entered in Microsoft Excel 2010. All the entries were double-checked for accuracy. Continuous variables were summarised as mean±standard deviation, median (range) as appropriate. The frequency distribution of different sub-types of ENL was calculated as percentages. The frequency distribution of IHC markers in each subtype of ENL were calculated as percentages.

Results

In this retrospective study, a total of 317 newly diagnosed lymphoma cases were retrieved, among them pENLs constituted (79, 24.92%), of which extra nodal NHL accounted for (77, 24.29%) were included in the study. Hodgkin lymphomas accounted for two cases which were not included. Majority of the patients were from higher age group with peak incidence seen in fifth decade of life with age range of 4-81 years with a mean age of 48.42 years (Table/Fig 1). The study included 50 males and 27 females, with a male to female ratio of 1.85:1.

Gastrointestinal tract (35/77, 45.45%) was the most common site, followed by head and neck (16/77-20.77%), Mediastinum (4/77-5.19%), kidney (4/77-5.19%), mesenteric mass, testis (3/77-3.89%) in each, ovary and skin (2/77-2.59%) in each, bone, brain, breast, paraspinal region, liver, lung, uterus and ankle (1/77-1.29%) in each were the rare anatomic sites of pENLs observed (Table/Fig 2).

In the GIT, stomach was the most commonly involved site (24/35) followed by the small intestine (5/35), colon and anal canal (3/35) and caecum region (3/35) (Table/Fig 3). In the head and neck region, nasopharynx (6/16) was most common site involved followed by tonsil and oral cavity (3/16 in each), orbit, base of tongue, postcricoid, and scalp (1/16 in each) (Table/Fig 4).

On IHC, 62/77 (80.51%) of pENLs had B immunophenotype whereas T-cell phenotype was observed in 15/77 (19.48%) patients. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL) was the most common histological type observed in 51/77 (66.23%), followed by PTL NOS were observed in 14/77 (18.18%) cases, and Extra nodal marginal zone lymphoma of MALT type seen in 9/77 (11.68%) cases (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4), among them, two cases were associated with H.pylori in gastric biopsy. Seropositivity for HIV was seen in a case of plasmablastic lymphoma involving the scalp. One case of T-cell lymphoma was observed in small intestine in which the patient had history of renal transplant. Mantle cell lymphoma and anaplastic large cell lymphoma involving the kidney and nasopharynx were observed in one patient each, respectively (Table/Fig 5).

The histopathological features of primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of testis, uterus endometrium and of the uterus ovary are shown in (Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8), respectively. Primary Anaplastic large cell lymphoma of Nasopharynx has been depicted in (Table/Fig 9). The features of Primary Peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS of liver, primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of colon, MALT Lymphoma ileum, primary peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS of stomach and primary mantle cell lymphoma of kidney are illustrated in (Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14).

Discussion

Extra nodal Non Hodgkin Lymphomas (NHLs) are heterogeneous disorders in relation to geography, ethnicity, anatomic, aetiological and morphological diversities (14). The male to female ratio in the present study was 1.85:1, majority of the studies reported male predominance (7),(15),(16),(17),(18). The peak incidence was seen in the fourth and fifth decades which was similar in some studies (15),(16), while other studies reported younger age incidence in fourth and fifth decades (17),(18). The incidence of ENL tends to be high when the incidence of lymphomas are high, the incidence was particularly high in France (42%) and Kuwait (43%) (19). The incidence of extra nodal NHLs varies greatly between countries, approximately 25-40% of NHL patients present with pENLs in developing countries. In developed countries the incidence was high in USA (24%), Canada (27%), Israel (36%), Lebanon (44%), Denmark (37%) and Holland (41%) (20). In the present study, the incidence of extra nodal non Hodgkin’s lymphomas was 77 (24.29%), nearly similar incidence was reported in some studies (26.9%, 22%, 22.6% 24%, 23% (15),(17),(18),(21),(22) some studies reported high incidence (54.7%, 46.6% 87.8%) (16),(20),(23). In the present study, the most common site of occurrence for primary extra nodal NHLs was GIT 35 (45.45%) followed by head and neck 16 (20.77%) followed by mediastinum, kidney, testis, skin and others. The GIT was the common site in many studies (30.4%, 62.5%, 43%, 87.8%) (20),(21),(22),(23). CNS was the most common site reported by few authors (20.3%, 29.5%) (16),(17) some reported head and neck as the most common site (7),(18),(24),(25),(26). One possible explanation for head and neck being the most common site could be due to usage of agricultural pesticides, environmental pollutants, poor dental hygiene and tobacco chewing (27),(28).

In the GIT, the most common site was stomach similar to reports in the literature (17),(18),(21),(23),(29). Mishra P et al., reported ileum as the most common site followed by stomach (18). (Table/Fig 15) shows comparison of epidemiological, histological features, sites of occurrence of pENLs between the present study and published literature (7),(15),(16),(17),(18),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24),(25),(29). Among the 77 cases of primary extra nodal non Hodgkin’s lymphomas reported in the present study, 62 cases (80.51%) accounted for B-cell immunophenotype. Among them, DLBCL was the most common subtype accounting for 51 (66.23%) and was the most common subtype in GIT, head and neck, kidney and testis which was similar in many studies in the literature (62.9%, 69%, 54% 56.7%, 67.7%, 71%, 58.6%, 31%) (Table/Fig 15) (16),(17),(18),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24).

The second most common subtype among the B-cell immunophenotypes was MALT lymphomas accounting for 9 (11.68%) cases and it was the third most common subtype following DLBCL and PTL-NOS among all cases and it was the second most common subtype noted in GIT in the present study (Table/Fig 11),(Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13) also reported in many studies (1.42% 12%, 13.41%, 19.79%, 7.2%, 10.5%) (Table/Fig 15) (16),(18),(20),(21),(22),(23). Out of the 9 MALT lymphomas, 2 (22.22%) cases were shown to have association with Helicobacter pylori. Study done by Arora N et al., reported H.pylori in 44% of MALT lymphomas cases and other reported literature accounts for 92 (29).

In the present study, follicular lymphomas were distinctively absent from extra nodal sites. Geographic variation in molecular expression profiling in follicular lymphomas as well as between nodal and extra nodal sites may be possible explanations for complete absence of this entity in the present study and more over high grade transformation of pre-existent low-grade MALT or follicular lymphoma into DLBCL at extra nodal sites might be also another explanation for this observation (7),(30).

T-cell phenotype was observed in 15/77 (19.48%) patients and they were the second most common among primary extra nodal NHLs. Among them, 14 cases were peripheral T-cell lymphomas NOS (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 13) and the remaining one case was Anaplastic large cell lymphoma (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 6),(Table/Fig 7),(Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9). In study done by Yang QP et al., peripheral T-cell lymphoma NOS was the most common type in different parts of China similar to the present study and Extra nodal Natural Killer T-cell Lymphoma (ENKTCL) was common in Hong Kong (7). Padhi S et al., has reported eight T-cell lymphomas only in skin (17).

Swami R et al., reported T-cell lymphomas as the second most common similar to the present study (15). Mishra P et al., reported 13% of PTL NOS, 3% of ENKTCL and 2% of ALCLs (18). The PTL NOS occuring at different sites like bone, soft tissue, waldeyer’s ring, small intestine and ENKTCLs at different sites were reported by Fujita A et al., (20). Farooq S et al., reported only two cases of PTL NOS out of 96 cases of pENLs (Table/Fig 15) (21).

According to WHO, primary renal lymphomas account for <1% of pENLs and the most common histological subtype being DLBCL. The present study reported 4 (5.19%) cases of primary extra nodal NHLs of which three were DLBCLs and one was mantle cell lymphoma (Table/Fig 14) similar to the given literature (16). Primary mediastinal lymphomas account for 10% of lymphomas (31). The most common primary mediastinal lymphomas are Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL), Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma (PMBCL) and T-Lymphoblastic Lymphoma (TLL) (32). In the present study, 4 (5.19%) cases were mediastinal lymphomas of which 3 were DLBCLs, and one was PTL NOS. Mishra P et al., reported three (4%) mediastinal lymphomas of which two were DLBCLs and one was lymphoblastic lymphoma (18). The present study reported 1 case of PTL NOS in the small intestine of post renal transplant patient. Arora N et al., reported nine cases of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders of them four cases were located in stomach and four in small intestine and one case was multifocal in GIT (29).

Primary bone lymphomas account for 3-5% of pENLs and majority are intermediate to high grade B-cell lymphomas (33). The present study reported 1 (1.26%) case of DLBCL arising in bone similar to study done by Mishra P et al., (1.2%), Padhi S et al., (2 cases-3%) [17,18]. Higher number of primary bone lymphomas were reported by Al Shemmari SH et al., (6 cases-6%), Fujita A et al., (18 cases- 4.6%), Mehta J et al., (7 cases-7%) and Temmim L et al., (16),(20),(22),(23).

In the present study, one case of plasmablastic lymphoma in the scalp with retroviral positivity was reported. Aravind S et al., reported a single case of plasmablastic lymphoma in maxilla with retroviral positivity (24). Usually, plasmablastic lymphomas arise at the back drop of HIV infection. Study by Mehta J et al., reported nine cases of Plasmablastic lymphomas of them four arising in CNS, three in bone and one each in soft tissue and head and neck (Table/Fig 5),(Table/Fig 15) (16).

Different sites such as ovary, ankle, testis, breast, uterus, lung, skin, liver, orbit and paravertebral region were reported, majority of the cases were DLBCLs except for PTL NOS occurring in liver, ovary and skin in the present study.

Limitation(s)

The present study was a morphological and epidemiological study, data regarding clinical presentation, disease stage, treatment received and outcomes were not included. Associated co-morbid conditions, occupation of patients, haematological, biochemical parameters were not included. Another drawback of the study was comparison with paediatric group was lacking due to very less number. Molecular diagnostic techniques such as cytogenetics/ fluorescence in-situ hybridisation were not performed in any of the cases due to lack of facilities.

Conclusion

The pENLs are a diverse group of haemato-lymphoid malignancies, Non Hodgkin’s lymphomas were the most pENLs the incidence of which is low in India compared to rest of the world, the prognosis of which depends on the extra nodal site. Gastrointestinal tract and Head and Neck lymphomas are the first and second common extra nodal sites noted. There was not much differences noted regarding the gender predilection, incidence and morphology compared to other studies. All the patients were immunocompetent. The diagnosis of pENLs can be challenging due to the morphological mimics and varied clinical presentation and that is the reason all of us should keep in mind the possibility of pENLs. In future, indepth studies with addition of genetic profile and therapeutic outcome should be conducted from time to time in order to understand the biology of these tumours.

References

1.
Zucca E, Roggero E, Bertoni F, Conconi A, Cavalli F. Primary extranodal non- Hodgkin’s lymphomas. Part 2: Head and neck, central nervous system and other less common sites. Ann Oncol. 1999;10(9):1023-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2004;54(1):08-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Mahhdoomi R, Nayil K, Rayees A, Kirmani A, Ramzan A, Khalil MB, et al. Primary CNS lymphoma in immunocompetent: A review of literature and our experience from Kashmir. Turk Neurosurg. 2011;21(1):39-47.
4.
Yaqo RT, Hughson Md, Sulayvani FK, Al-Allwai NA. Malignant lymphoma in Northern Iraq: A retrospective analysis of 270 cases according to the World Health Organisation classification. Ind J Cancer. 2011;48(4):446-51. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Rehman SA, Sidique M, Ahmad G, Naiz M. Extra nodal lymphoma. Prof Med J. 2005;12(3):223-29.
6.
Krol ADG, le Cessie S, Snijder S, Kluin-Nelemans JC, Kluin PM, Noordijk EM. Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL): The impact of alternative definitions tested in the comprehensive cancer centre West population-based NHL registry. Ann Oncol. 2003;14(1):131-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Yang QP, Zhang WY, Yu JB, Zhao S, Xu H, Wang WY, et al. Subtype distribution of lymphomas in Southwest China: Analysis of 6,382 cases using WHO classification in a single institution. Diagnostic Pathology. 2011;6:77. Doi: 10.1186/ 1746-1596-6-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Dawson IM, Cornes JS, Morson BC. Primary malignant lymphoid tumours of the intestinal tract. Report of 37 cases with a study of factors influencing prognosis. Br J Surg. 1961;49:80-89. Doi: 10.1002/bjs.18004921319. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. A clinical evaluation of the International Lymphoma Study Group classification of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Blood. 1997;89(11):3909-18. [crossref]
10.
Cavalli F. Extranodal lymphomas. In Magrath IT (ed): The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphomas (2nd edn). London: Arnold. 1997;1007-27.
11.
Chan JKC, Ng CS, Lo STH. Immunohistological characterization of malignant lymphomas of the waldeyer’s ring other than the nasopharynx. Histopathology. 1987;11(9):885-99. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Lillie RD. Histopathologic Technique and Practical Histochemistry (3rd ed). McGraw- Hill, New York, 1965.
13.
Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, et al. (editors). World Health Organisation Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th Edn. IARC, Lyon, France, (2008) Pp.10.
14.
Anderson JR, Armitage JO, Weisenburger DD. Epidemiology of the non- Hodgkin’s lymphomas: Distributions of the major subtypes differ by geographic locations. Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Classification Project. Ann Oncol. 1998;9(7):717-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Swami R, Singh S, Singh P, Mani NS, Karandikar MN. Extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A case series at a tertiary care hospital. IP Archives of Cytology and Histopathology Research. 2020;5(4):302-05. [crossref]
16.
Mehta J, Thakrar MP, Meena M, Mittal A, Gupta K. Primary extranodal non- hodgkin lymphoma: A 2-year retrospective analysis from a tertiary care centre in Rajasthan. Int J Med Res Prof. 2016;2(4):76-80. [crossref]
17.
Padhi S, Paul TR, Challa S, Prayaga AK, Rajappa S, Raghunadharao D, et al. Primary extra nodal non hodgkin lymphoma: A 5 year retrospective analysis. Asian Pacific J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(10):4889-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Mishra P, Das S, Kar R, Jacob SE, Basu D. Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A 3-year record-based descriptive study from a tertiary care centre in Southern India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2015;58(3):296-300. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Newton R, Ferlay J, Beral V, Devesa SS. The epidemiology of Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Comparison of nodal and extra-nodal sites. Int J Cancer. 1997;72(6):923-30. 3.0.CO;2-R>[crossref]
20.
Fujita A, Tomita N, Fujita H, Motohashi K, Hyo R, Yamazaki E, et al. Features of primary extranodal lymphoma in Kanagawa: A human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 nonendemic area in Japan. Medical Oncology. 2009;26(1):49-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Farooq S, Reshi R, Hassan Z, Nazir N, Beigh A, Abass F. Histopathological spectrum of primary extranodal non hodgkin’s lymphomas in kashmir valley: A 5 years study. Int J Biol Med Res. 2014;5(4):4654-59.
22.
Al Shemmari SH, Ameen RM, Sajnani KP. Extranodal lymphoma: A comparative study. Hematology. 2008;13(3):163. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Temmim L, Baker H, Amanguno H, Madda JP, Sinowatz F. Clinicopathological features of extranodal lymphomas: Kuwait experience. Oncology. 2004;67:382-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Aravind S, Sangeetha KN, Sreejyothi HK, Vineetha R, Chandran KN. Primary extranodal lymphomas in the head and neck region: A retrospective study from a tertiary cancer centre in south India. International Journal of Recent Scientific Research. 2017;8(3):16245-48. [crossref]
25.
Singh D, Kumar L, Goyal H, Raina V, Bijlani L, Wadhwa J, et al. Primary extranodal non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in Northern India. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2003;22:2457.
26.
Chen W, Tsai W, Chao T. The clinicopathological analysis of 303 cases with malignant lymphoma classified according to the World Health Organisation classification system in asingle institute of Taiwan. Ann Hematol. 2010;89(6):553-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Vose J, Armitage J, Weisenburger D. International peripheral T-cell and natural killer/T-cell lymphoma study: Pathology findings and clinical outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4124-30. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Ko OB, Lee DH, Kim SW, Lee JS, Kim S, Huh J, et al. Clinicopathologic characteristics of T-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: A single institution experience. Korean J Intern Med. 2009;24(2):128-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
29.
Arora N, Manipadam MT, Pulimood A, Ramakrishna BS, Chacko A, Kurian SS, et al. Gastrointestinal lymphomas: Pattern of distribution and histological subtypes: 10 years experience in a tertiary centre in South India. Indian J Pathol Microbiol. 2011;54(4):712-19.
30.
Biagi JJ, Seymour JF. Insight into the molecular pathogenesis of follicular lymphoma arising from analysis of geographic variation. Blood. 2002;99(12):4265-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Duwe BV, Sterman DH, Musani AI. Tumours of the mediastinum. Chest. 2005;128(4):2893-909. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Strollo DC, Rosado-de-Christenson ML, Jett JR. Primary mediastinal tumours: Part II. Tumours of the middle and posterior mediastinum. Chest. 1997;112(2):1344-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Boddie AW Jr, Mullins JD, West G, Bouda D. Extranodal lymphoma: Surgical and other therapeutic alternatives. Curr Probl Cancer. 1982;6(9):01-64. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51365.16561

Date of Submission: Jul 13, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Aug 07, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Mar 15, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 20, 2022
• Manual Googling: Feb 03, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Mar 25, 2022 (23%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com