Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 103691

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : CC31 - CC34 Full Version

Normative Data of Maximal Oxygen Consumption (VO2 Max) among Healthy Young Adults: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53660.16672
Karampreet Kour Buttar, Sudhanshu Kacker, Neha Saboo

1. PhD Scholar, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 2. Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Sudhanshu Kacker,
Professor, Department of Physiology, RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.
E-mail: sudhanshukacker@gmail.com; karampreetbuttar007@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) is the maximum quantity of oxygen a person can consume, and it remains constant over time despite increased exertion. The amount of oxygen consumed by the working muscles is measured by maximal oxygen consumption. The maximal oxygen uptake can be measured using maximal or submaximal tests, by gas analyser or field methods. The estimated VO2 max can be used to study people’s fitness and raise awareness about physical activity and lifestyle changes.

Aim: To determine the VO2 max values using a direct method and provide normative data of VO2 max for healthy young adults in the age group of 18-25 years in both sexes.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee of RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. A total of 419 healthy young adults (male and female students) were recruited from RUHS-College of Medical Sciences and MNIT College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India from January 2019 to March 2020. Anthropometric data included age, height, weight according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and followed by measurement of VO2 max using a gas analyser of AD-Instrument (model-ML206). Collected data was entered in Microsoft excel. Paired t-test was used to compare mean and Standard Deviation (SD) of variables between male and female participants. The p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant.

Results: The study was conducted on 419 apparently healthy college students (275 male and 144 female). The mean VO2 max value for males was 45.30±7.35 mL/kg/min and for females it was 35.71±5.29 mL/kg/min, which was found to be significantly higher in males than in females. The mean VO2 max among the largest proportion of the males (27.63%) falls in the ‘Good’ category of cardiorespiratory fitness scale and the largest proportion of the females (32.63%) falls in the ‘Fair’ category of cardiorespiratory fitness scale.

Conclusion: The value of VO2 max was lower in the Indian population than in the western population, when value obtained from this study was compared with the standard normative value of cardiorespiratory fitness. Therefore, the values obtained in this study could serve as a normative for the Indian population.

Keywords

Cardiorespiratory fitness scale, Direct method, Gas analyser, Maximum oxygen consumption, Normative value

Cardiorespiratory fitness, also called cardiovascular fitness or high aerobic strength, is the total capacity of the heart, blood, and respiratory systems and the ability to perform prolonged strenuous physical activity. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) achieved during maximal graded exercise to voluntary exhaustion has long been considered by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to be the single best measure of cardiorespiratory fitness (1). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) is the maximum amount of oxygen a person can consume, and it remains constant over time despite increased exertion. The amount of oxygen consumed by working muscles is measured by maximal oxygen consumption. It is expressed in L/min in absolute value or in mL/kg/min in relative VO2 max (2). Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) is one of the most widely available measurements in exercise physiology. VO2 max has been used in various ways in clinical science as a measure of physical performance (3). It is a marker of physical fitness and cardiovascular disease in the population (4). The use of VO2 max is widespread, ranging from elite athletes to people with multiple medical conditions (5).

Hill AV suggested that there is a limited rate of transport of large amounts of oxygen from the environment to the mitochondria to support oxidative production of Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to perform physical activity (6). Maximal oxygen uptake is a marker of individual’s fitness and many heart disease in the population. A person’s max is the gold standard for assessing their cardiorespiratory endurance (7).

According to Shephard RJ, the primary endpoint for achieving VO2 max is a VO2 plateau. Several secondary criteria exist in the event that a VO2 plateau is not reached, including an increase in the Respiratory Exchange Rate (RER) greater than 1.15, a blood lactate concentration greater than 8 m mol/L and an increase in heart rate to the age-predicted maximum (8). A person’s cardiorespiratory fitness can be measured using VO2 max estimation by direct or indirect methods (9). Cardiorespiratory fitness is categorised as Very Poor, Poor, Fair, Good, Excellent, and Superior for both genders based on Western population VO2 max values (10).

Direct method: (laboratory method) Measures an individual’s expired gases for analysis of pulmonary ventilation, inspiratory O2, and expired CO2. Direct measures accurately determine a person’s higher oxygen consumption by breathing through air analysis.

Indirect methods: These include field tests, measuring a person’s aerobic strength based on heart rate; distance traveled, or test duration when a specific procedure is used.

Previous research has used both direct and indirect approaches to generate normative values for VO2 max in the Caucasian population, and standard ranges that predict whether an individual’s cardiorespiratory fitness falls into the upper or lower have been calculated accordingly (11),(12). However, only a few studies have been performed using the direct technique of analysis of maximal oxygen consumption in the Indian population, and there is no standard or range by which VO2 max can be compared for this population (13),(14).

John N et al., explained that the Indian population differs from the Western population in many ways, including body stature, lifestyle, diet, nutrition, and physical activity levels, all of which can directly or indirectly influence the maximal oxygen consumption (13). Ethnic background has an effect on VO2 max, and Indians differed significantly from whites in terms of physical appearance, nutrition, exercise, environment, and socio-economic characteristics (15). However, despite its usefulness, there is a lack of data, especially for the healthy Indian population using the direct method. To compare previous studies, there is no such type of study available to estimate VO2 max in the Indian population using the direct method in both sexes. Therefore, it is important to have another set of values to compare with the VO2 max for the Indian population. Hence, the current study aims to determine VO2 max values using a straightforward method and to provide normative data for VO2 max for healthy adults in the age group 18-25 years for both sexes.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was carried out in the Research Laboratory of the Department of Physiology at RUHS College of Medical Sciences, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) (letter of approval no. RUHS-CMS/Ethics Comm/2018/148 of 21/12/18), the study was conducted from January 2019 to March 2020.

Inclusion criteria: Only active healthy adults between the 18-25 years age group of either sex were included in present study.

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with hypertension, diabetes, heart, respiratory and musculoskeletal disorders and had a history of hospitalisation within the past three months, smokers and alcoholics were excluded from the study. Students who regularly practice physical exercise or Yoga were also excluded from the study.

Sample size: The sample size (381 + 38 = 419) was calculated using the standard formula n=Z2pq/d2 with a confidence level of 95%, a margin of error of 5% and a non response of 10% based on the prevalence of 45.6% of physically active individuals in the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)-India Diabetes (INDIAB) study (2014) (16).

A total of 419 young healthy medical students of both sexes, aged 18-25 years, were recruited with the help of a computerised random table generator for the study. Preliminary information on the purpose of the study, the test procedure, the test method, instructions on how to perform the test was provided via the Participant Information Sheet (PIS), then the subjects were recruited for the study of the test after signing the consent form Physical activity was assessed using the global physical activity questionnaire (17). Subjects were considered physically active when they achieved Metabolic Equivalent of Tasks (MET) tasks of ≥600 per week. Based on the questionnaire, physically inactive students (METs <600) were excluded from the study. The subject did not perform any form of exercise prior to the test.

Subjects were examined under similar laboratory conditions (temperature 27-29ºC and relative humidity between 75% and 80%). They were also asked to avoid heavy meals/tea/coffee and any type of exercise atleast two hours before the test. A detailed medical history was collected and a clinical examination was performed prior to starting the test procedure. Anthropometric data, which included age, height, weight, were measured in accordance with the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Body Mass Index (BMI) was (18.5 -24.75 kg/m2). Each subject’s BMI was calculated as weight in kg divided by height in square meters (18). VO2 max was measured using a direct method with the help of the gas analyser of the instrument AD (model-ML206): subjects were asked to come in the morning or 2-3 hours after the last meal. The classified exercise test protocol was first explained and demonstrated to the subjects before proceeding further with it. The subjects were made to wear a mask connected to the gas analyser that measures the total amount of gas inhaled and exhaled during the test. The treadmill graduated stress test protocol was followed in which subjects were asked to walk for three minutes at the horizontal level followed by jogging at the selected speed (b/w 4.3-7.5 mph) at the level of incline for three minutes and then at a constant speed, The grade of the treadmill was increased by 2.5% every minute until the subject becomes tired and unable to continue exercising. The equipment is connected to a monitor screen, which shows the various values, eg. Oxygen volume (VO2), Carbon dioxide volume (VCO2), Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER), MET etc. every 10 seconds (19). Cardiorespiratory fitness is classified into very poor, poor, fair, good, excellent, superior categories in both sexes based on the VO2 max values of the Western population (20).

Statistical Analysis

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was performed to test the normality of the outcome variables. All data were presented as mean±SD. An independent t-test was used to compare the mean differences and SD of the variables between male and female participants. The ‘p’ value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

The study was conducted on 419 healthy students (275 males and 144 females).

(Table/Fig 1) shows the mean age of male was 20.34±2.02 years and female was 20.22±2.02 years (p=0.56). The mean BMI (Kg/m2) of males was 21.94±2.99 and females was 21.21±3.02 kg/m2 (p=0.02), and the mean body fat % in male was 14.51±4.74% and for women it was 22.82±6.27%. The mean value of VO2 max for males was 45.30±7.35 mL/kg/min and for female it was 35.71±5.29 mL/kg/min, which was found significantly higher in males than in females (p<0.001).

(Table/Fig 2) shows mean value of VO2 max for male and female and its range.

(Table/Fig 3) shows comparison of mean±SD VO2 max among the majority of the male was found (27.63%) in the good category, 2.54% proportion fell in the very poor category and 20.72 % fell in the superior category of cardiorespiratory fitness normative value.

(Table/Fig 4) shows comparison of mean VO2 max among the majority of the females (32.63%) found in the fair category, the lowest portion (3.47%) fell in the very poor category and 15.97% were found in the superior category of cardiorespiratory fitness normative value.

Discussion

The assessment of cardiorespiratory fitness is invaluable in educating individuals about their overall fitness status, developing exercise programs, and quantifying cardiovascular risk.

According to (Table/Fig 1), the average age of the male was 20.34±2.02 years and the female 20.22±2.02 years (p=0.56). There was no statistically significant difference in age in two groups. In this study, mean VO2 max was 45.30±7.35 mL/kg/min for males and 35.71±5.29 mL/kg/min for females, which was statistically significantly higher in males (p<0.001). The results of present study was consistent with other studies that have examined VO2 max in male subjects and were significantly higher compared to female participants (21). Comparing the VO2 max values of present study with previously published values in the western population, it is noticeable that the VO2 max values were higher in the western population study. In this case, the VO2 max for males was 48.6±9.6 mL/kg/min and for females 40.3±7.1 mL/kg/min (22). A study conducted by McArdle WD et al., this difference was attributed to differences in body composition and blood haemoglobin concentration. An unfit young adult woman has 25% body fat, while the average for men is 15% (23). Therefore, male generate more overall aerobic energy simply because they have greater muscle mass (and less fat than females), which in turn leads to increased oxygen uptake and utilisation. Bandyopadhyay A and Bandyopadhyay P reported that males are superior to their female counterparts (24). Men outperform women in cardiorespiratory fitness due to lower body fat percentage and other factors related primarily to heart size and oxygen carrying capacity (maximum heart rate (HRmax) and maximum stroke volume) (25).

According to (Table/Fig 2), the mean VO2 max in males was 45.30±7.35 mL/kg/min with a minimum of 31.19 mL/kg/min and a maximum of 52.43 mL/kg/min. The mean VO2 max in females was 35.71±5.29 mL/kg/min with a minimum value of 22.79 mL/kg/min and a maximum value of 41.21 mL/kg/min. When comparing VO2 max to the standard VO2 max classification, subjects in this study are classified as good on the cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 max) scale (20). Similar results were obtained in the study by Nitin YM et al., who observed the VO2 max using the direct method in 20 male young adults. They observed that VO2 max ranged from 22.9 mL/kg/min to 47.8 mL/kg/min and 60% of the subjects fell in the good category (10). The mean VO2 max obtained from this study was lower compared to those obtained in the Caucasian population (20). Similar results were found in another study conducted by John N et al., that examined the difference in maximal oxygen consumption in 101 Indian adults and developed a predictive equation. VO2 max was shown to be significantly lower in the Indian population than in the Western population. It revealed that VO2 max was influenced by ethnicity and that Indians differed greatly from whites in terms of body structure, diet, physical activity, environment and socio-economic factors (13).

(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4) show the current VO2 max value compared to the standard VO2 max categorisation. There is a different fitness scale for men and women, and when subjects were placed into the fitness levels, the majority of men (27.63 percent) fell into the VO2 max category good but the majority of women had fair VO2 max. Furthermore, 20.72% of the male population had an outstanding maximal oxygen uptake compared to 15.97% of the female population. VO2 max (most subjects belong to cardiorespiratory fitness group fair or good) in current subjects could be due to decreased physical activity and harmful lifestyle patterns developed over years of education, which could influence the behaviour and health of adults condition. These findings are in line with those of several other investigations published in the literature (21),(26). This finding was consistent with the findings of a previous study by Varghese RS et al., which indicated that the majority of men (24.3%) had a VO2 max above average, while the majority of women (48.2%) had a VO2 max below average (26).

Directly measured VO2 max is one of the basic index measures to assess cardiorespiratory fitness, reflecting the state of the circulatory and respiratory systems. Lack of cardiorespiratory fitness may play a role in the global increase in the prevalence of degenerative cardiovascular diseases. VO2 max represents a fundamental measure in exercise physiology and serves as a standard for estimates of aerobic capacity.

Limitation(s)

This study included only healthy young adult students in the age group 18-25 years. The sample size was small and the study was not applicable to all age groups. Therefore, more studies can be carried out in a larger sample size with different age groups.

Conclusion

The present study concluded that the VO2 max value was lower in the Indian population than in the Western population, when the value obtained in this study was compared with the standard normative value of cardiorespiratory fitness. The maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) value of this study could be used as a standard for cardiorespiratory fitness scale for healthy young adults in Indian. People’s fitness can be measured using estimated VO2 max and awareness can be raised about the relevance of physical activity and lifestyle adjustment in the primary prevention of cardiovascular, metabolic and mental diseases.

Acknowledgement

Authors would like to appreciate the participation of each participant and thank all the professors of the Physiology department.

References

1.
Shephard RJ, Allen C. The maximum oxygen intake. An international reference standard of cardio respiratory fitness. Bull World Health Organ. 1968;38(5):757-64.
2.
Leger LA, Mercier D. The multistage 20 meter shuttle run test for aerobic fitness. J Sports Sci. 1988;6(2):93-101. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Mitchell JH, Sproule BJ. The physiological meaning of the maximal oxygen intake test. J Clin Invest. 1958;37(4):538-47. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Blair SN, Kampert JB. Influences of cardio-respiratory fitness and other precursors on cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in men and women. JAMA. 1996;276(3):205-10. [crossref]
5.
Bassett DR, Howley ET. Limiting factor for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance. Med Science Sport Exercise. 2000;32(1):70-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Hill AV. Muscular Activity. London: Bailliere: Tindall and Cox; 1925:01-15.
7.
Carter JG, Brooks KA. Comparison of the YMCA cycle sub-maximal VO2 max test to a treadmill VO2 max test. Int Journal of Exercise Science. 2011;5(11):121-29.
8.
Shephard RJ. Tests of maximum oxygen intake. A critical review. Sports Med. 1984;1(2):99-124. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Buttar KK, Saboo N, Kacker S. Maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) and its estimation methods. Int J Phy Educ Sports Health. 2019;6(6):24-32.
10.
Nitin YM, Sucharita S, Madhura M, Thomas S, Sandhya TA. VO2 max in an Indian population: A study to understand the role of factors determining VO2 max. Ind J Physiol Pharmacol. 2013;57(2):87-94.
11.
Steeg GE, Takken T. Reference values for maximum oxygen uptake relative to body mass in Dutch/Flemish subjects aged 6-65 years: The low lands fitness registry. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021;121:1189-96. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Jang WY, Kim W, Kang DO, Park Y, Lee J, Choi JY, et al. Reference values for cardio-respiratory fitness in healthy Koreans. J Clin Med. 2019;8:2191-2203. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
John N, Thangakunam B, Devasahayam AJ, Peravali V, Christopher DJ. Maximal oxygen uptake is lower for a healthy Indian population compared to white populations. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2011;31:322-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Buttar KK, Saboo N, Kacker S. Maximal oxygen consumption (VO2 max) estimation using direct & indirect method in Indian population: A pilot study. J Clin Diag Res. 2020;14(2):CC06-CC08. [crossref]
15.
Suminski RR, Mattern CO, Devor ST. Influence of racial origin and skeletal muscle properties on disease prevalence and physical performance. Sports Med. 2002;32:667-73. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Anjana RM, Pradeepa R. Physical activity and inactivity patterns in India-results from the ICMR-INDIAB study (phase-1). Int J Behaviural Nutrition Physical Activity. 2014;11:26. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
World Health Organization. WHO STEPS Surveillance Manual: The WHO STEP wise Approach to Chronic Disease Risk Factor Surveillance. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2005.
18.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)- Anthropometry Procedure Manual, January 2016. CDC; World Health Organization.
19.
Verhs PR, Geordge JD. Sub maximal treadmill exercise test to predict VO2 max in fit adults. Measurements in physical education and exercise science. 2007;11(2):61-72. [crossref]
20.
Heyward VH, Wagner D, Gibson A. Advanced Fitness Assessment and Exercise Prescription, 5th edition, 2006.
21.
Rymbui DB, Devi P, Devi G, Gowda K, Bhardwaj P Cardiorespiratory fitness among MBBS students of RIMS, Imphal. Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2016;15(6):23-25.
22.
Edvarden E, Hansen AJ, Holme IM, Dyrstad SM, Anderssen SA. References values for cardiorespiratory response and fitness on the treadmill in a 20-85 year old population. Chest. 2013;144(1):241-48. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
McArdle WD, Katch FI, Pechar GS, Jacobson L, Ruck S. Reliability and interrelationships between maximal oxygen intake, physical work capacity and step-test scores in college women. Med Sci Sports. 1972; 4(4):182-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Bandyopadhyay A, Bandyopadhyay P. Cardio-respiratory fitness in college students of Uttar Pradesh, India. J of Exercise Science and Physiotherapy. 2007;3(1):44-47.
25.
Marta CC, Marinho DA, Barbosa TM, Izquierdo M, Marques MC. Physical Fitness difference between boys and girls. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;26(7):1756-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Varghese RS, Dhangi A, Verghese A. VO2 max normative values using queen’s college step test in healthy urban Indian individuals of age group 20-50 years. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR). 2020:9(6):803-06.

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53660.16672

Date of Submission: Jan 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Feb 17, 2022
Date of Acceptance: May 28, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 05, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 27, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 30, 2022 (10%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com