Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 101186

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : July | Volume : 16 | Issue : 7 | Page : CC10 - CC15 Full Version

Comparison of Motor Nerve Conduction Velocity between Football Players and Sedentary Individuals: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57453.16613
Gokul Suresh Revathy, Arsha Krishnan

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Sree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Ernakulam, Kerala, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Physiology, Sree Narayana Institute of Medical Sciences, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Gokul Suresh Revathy,
Revathy House, Karattupallikkara, Perumbavoor-683542, Ernakulam, Kerala, India.
E-mail: gkr9900@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Athletic training improves the cardiovascular, pulmonary and musculoskeletal performance. A number of studies have also suggested an improvement in neural capabilities. Nerve sConduction Study (NCS) helps in learning about various electrophysiological parameters of the nerve such as Nerve Conduction Velocity (NCV), latency, amplitude, duration, etc. They influence co-ordination and speed of voluntary activity.

Aim: To study the Motor Nerve Conduction Velocities (MNCV) of trained athletes and compare their values with untrained individuals.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Trissur, Kerala, India, from January 2016 to January 2017. The sample consisted of 60 male subjects who included 30 athletes and 30 non athletes between ages 18 to 25. MNCV, latency, amplitude and duration of median, ulnar, and tibial nerves of both sides of the subjects were measured. These were compared using independent t-test, and p-value <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results: The MNCV in athletes were found to be faster than non athletes. The mean MNCV of left and right median nerves were 61.5±2.60 m/s and 61.45±2.52 m/s in athletes, and 56.48±2.70 m/s and 56.73±2.51 m/s in non athletes, respectively. The mean MNCV of the left and right ulnar nerves were 61.28±2.64 m/s and 61.58±3.15 m/s in athletes, and 57.87±3.42 m/s and 58.05±3.94 m/s in non athletes. The mean MNCV of the left and right tibial nerves were 46.34±3.44 m/s and 46.37±3.60 m/s in athletes, and 44.74±3.46 m/s and 44.86±3.58 m/s in non athletes. In both tibial nerves, the proximal and distal amplitude was higher, and the proximal and distal duration was lower in athletes.

Conclusion: The results indicated MNCV of athletes were higher which could be beneficial in their sports performance.

Keywords

Athletic training, Neural adaptation, Neural conduction

Professional athletes undergo a well-scheduled training regime that aims at improving their performance in the practicing sport by increasing not just the cardiovascular and muscular capacities, but also the neural capabilities (1),(2). Studies have shown that the nervous system, if properly trained, can recruit motor units much better, thus improving an athlete’s sporting activity (1),(3). The optimum amount of force applied at the right time can often be the difference between victory and loss in a professional sporting career. For example, in a penalty shootout, the nervous system of the football player has to deal with the daunting task of recruiting just the right set of muscles that would allow him to make a shot from where he stands, so that the ball would land inside the goal post but at the same time, evade the goal keeper (4). Various levels of the nervous system co-ordinate together to accomplish such motor activity (5).

The NCS is a type of electro-diagnostic procedure for studying the conduction of an impulse across a nerve. For motor nerves, it is carried out by stimulating the nerve electrically at two or more different sites and recording the response from the innervated muscle (6). The MNCV, a parameter derived from NCS which denotes the speed at which electrical potentials travel along the motor nerve fiber, has an influence on the effectiveness of motor activity (7),(8). MNCV along with cognitive ability and cerebellar learning can affect reaction time, an important element of well-coordinated motor activity (9),(10). Faster impulses reduce reaction time, which in turn increases athletic performance (10). MNCV is influenced by factors like age, temperature and height (6). Generally, conduction velocities tend to increase with age as the extent of myelination increases (11). However, after 30-40 years of age, conduction velocities tend to decline (12). Nerve impulses are found to conduct faster with an increase in temperature, as is seen after physical activity (1), and slower when there is a drop in temperature (13). Height was found to have an inverse correlation with nerve conduction velocities (14). Women in general were found to have higher conduction velocities than men (15).

Studies across the globe have found that physical training can have an effect on MNCV. In a 2005 study in China, where femoral and tibial NCVs of athletes trained in soccer and Sanshou (a Chinese martial art), were compared with untrained individuals, it was seen that the MNCV of athletes were significantly better than untrained individuals (16). In 2012, an Indian study concluded that a positive relationship of MNCV of radial and ulnar nerve in athletes may be the result of their long-term training that leads to neurophysiological adaptations (17). In 2013, a similar study in Brazil aimed at measuring the MNCV of the median and common fibular nerves in three groups of athletic activities -middle distance runners, sprinter runners and handball players (18). The MNCV of those practicing a sport were found to be significantly better than the control group, who were not participating in any. These studies raise a question on whether physical training undergone by athletes play a role in increasing their MNCV. Only few Indian studies were available in literature in this regard (17),(19). Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate this hypothesis by comparing MNCV of trained football players with sedentary subjects.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Thrissur, Kerala, India. Clearance from the Hospital Ethical Committee was obtained, after which, recruitment and data collection was conducted between January 2016 to January 2017.

Sample size calculation:

Sample size was calculated using the formula (20)

where z?=z value for ? error (the probability of falsely rejecting a true null hypothesis)

z?=z value for ? error (the probability of failing to reject a false null hypothesis)

SD=mean standard deviation between two groups

d=difference between the mean of two groups

The values for calculation were obtained from the study ‘Measurement of motor nerve conduction velocity in three different sports’ by Luís Paulo Nogueira Cabra (LPNC) Borges (18).

The values used were

(z?+z?)2=7.84 SD=6.25 d=6

It was calculated to be 16.98. However, a total of 30 athletes, who were trained football players, and 30 sedentary individuals were included in this study. They were selected by simple random sampling methods and based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Inclusion criteria: Athletes included healthy male football players between the ages of 18-25 from various institutions in Thrissur. Their exercise regime lasted approximately two hours each in the morning and evening for five days a week, for a minimum of one year. Their workout regimes included stretching, running, and football practice sessions.

Exclusion criteria: Individuals with history of neurological disease, trauma accompanied by nerve damage or any other medical illness, and those taking medications were excluded. Those with history of smoking or tobacco abuse were also excluded from the study.

The non athlete group included age and sex matched students of Government Medical College, Thrissur, with physical activity such as engaging in sports and/or regular exercise regimes less than a minimum of 30 minutes, three days a week.

Study Procedure

After obtaining a written consent from the study subjects, detailed history was taken and physical examination was performed. Height (cm) and weight (kg) were measured using standard protocol and Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated (kg/m2). Pulse rate (beats per minute) was obtained by counting the radial artery for one minute in sitting position. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mm of Hg) was recorded in the sitting position from the right upper limb, using standard mercury sphygmomanometer by palpatory and auscultatory methods.

On the basis of expert opinion, available laboratory facilities at the institute, and the ease of evaluation, MNCV of median, ulnar, and tibial nerves were selected for pursuing the present study. MNCV was measured using ‘Natus Dantac Keypoint’ by employing standard technique of supramaximal percutaneous stimulation with a constant current stimulator (21). After placing the three electrodes- G1 (active/anode), G2 (reference/cathode) and G0 (ground), the respective nerve was stimulated at a proximal and a distal point along its course through the limb (22). The placement of electrodes and sites of stimulation for each of the tested nerves are outlined below (Table/Fig 1) (6).

Upon stimulation, the generated nerve action potential transmits through the nerve, crosses the neuromuscular junction and stimulates the muscle, the response of which is recorded as the Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP). It is a biphasic potential from which parameters like conduction velocity, amplitude, latency and duration are derived (Table/Fig 2) (22). The time from stimulus to the initial negative deflection is called latency expressed in milliseconds (ms). Amplitude expressed in millivolts (mV) of the potential is commonly measured from baseline to negative peak. Duration (ms) is measured from initial deflection from baseline to first baseline crossing. Each nerve is stimulated at a proximal and distal site. The respective latencies at proximal (Lp) and distal (Ld) sites were recorded. Length of the nerve segment (D) between the points of proximal and distal stimulation was measured in millimeters (mm). Conduction Velocity (CV) was derived by dividing the distance between the stimulus points by the corresponding latency difference (22).

CV=D/Lp-Ld

It is expressed in ‘metres per second’.

The reported normal MNCVs of a few nerves are as follows.

Median MNCV: 58.52±3.76 m/s (21)

Ulnar MNCV (below elbow): 58.7±5.1 m/s (6)

(above elbow): 61.0±5.5 m/s (23)

Common Peroneal MNCV (below knee): 48.3±3.9 m/s (24)

(above knee): 52.0±6.2 m/s (24)

Posterior Tibial MNCV: 48.3±4.5 m/s (25)

Latency, amplitude and duration of the CMAP were also analysed in this study.

The variables measured were age, height, weight, BMI, pulse rate, blood pressure, MNCV, proximal and distal latencies, proximal and distal amplitudes, proximal and distal CMAP durations of right and left median, ulnar and tibial nerves.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Data was entered in Microsoft Excel 13 and analysed using Epi Info software version 7. Statistical analysis was done using independent t-test, and p-value <0.05 was taken as significant.

Results

The mean age of football players was 21.17±2.07 years and that of sedentary individuals was 20.83±1.82 years respectively, which was comparable (p-value=0.510). Mean values of quantitative variables such as height, weight, BMI, pulse rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure for both categories is shown in (Table/Fig 3). Pulse rate and systolic blood pressure were found to be significantly lower in football players (p-value <0.05). Other parameters were found to be comparable between the two groups (p-value >0.05).

The MNCV of right and left median, ulnar and tibial nerves of both groups were compared and they were found to be higher in athletes (Table/Fig 4), which was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). As height was known to be a confounding factor for MNCV (14), their correlation was checked using Pearson correlation coefficient (Table/Fig 5). Significant correlation was found only with right ulnar nerve (p=0.046).

The proximal and distal amplitudes between the two groups were compared (Table/Fig 6), revealing higher values for both tibial nerves and right ulnar nerve in athletes, which was statistically significant (p-value <0.05). The proximal and distal latencies of the two groups were also compared (Table/Fig 7), revealing lower values in both median nerves of athletes (proximal latency), which was statistically significant (p-value <0.05).

The proximal and distal CMAP durations between the two groups were compared (Table/Fig 8) revealing lower values in both tibial nerves of athletes, which was statistically significant (p-value <0.05).

Discussion

It was found that the MNCV of football players were higher than sedentary individuals in the median, ulnar and tibial motor nerves. The proximal and distal amplitudes of tibial motor nerves were higher, and the proximal latencies of median motor nerves were lower in athletes. Proximal and distal CMAP duration of tibial nerves, resting pulse rate and systolic blood pressure were also lower in athletes.

Evidence suggests that physical activity has some influence on nerve conduction velocity. In 1982, Sale DG et al., had shown that subjects who underwent limb immobilisation when subjected to a period of exercise training, showed faster median nerve conduction velocity (26). In 1985, Halar EM et al., also showed that the nerve conduction velocity of the sural nerve increased during 30 minutes of walking (1). A study was conducted by Van Meeteren NL et al., in 1997, observed the effects of exercise training on improving nerve function recovery after a sciatic nerve crush lesion in rats (27). The sensorimotor recovery was better with exercise training. Conduction velocity, especially in the late phase of recovery was significantly better in the trained group. These studies point to the fact that exercise training can improve MNCV. Athletes practice regular physical activity for improving their overall performance in the practicing sport. The effect of athletic training on skeletal muscle, cardiovascular and pulmonary physiology has received considerable attention (28). In present study also, the resting pulse rate and systolic blood pressure in athletes were found to be lower, possibly due to their higher vagal tone. The neural mechanisms leading to improvement in performance are equally important (1),(29),(30). Studies were conducted to find the change in MNCV in athletes is shown in (Table/Fig 9) (16),(17),(18). These studies were similar to present study where the MNCV of athletes were found to be higher. Two possible mechanisms explain this increase in MNCV in athletes. First, athletes usually have a lower body fat percentage which seems to improve their MNCV by better facilitation of neural transmission (31). Second, strict training regimes of athletes lead to functional overload which may increase the diameter of the nerve fibers and myelin sheath, causing higher velocity of nerve conduction (32). Higher MNCV causes shorter refractory period, which increases frequency of impulses to the muscle, thereby increasing muscular activation and athletic ability (30).

The present study also shows the proximal and distal amplitudes of tibial nerves to be significantly higher in athletes. The right ulnar nerve also presented higher proximal and distal amplitude in the case of athletes. This was similar to a study conducted in Nepal, where the tibial CMAP amplitudes were found to be higher in football players in comparison to untrained individuals (33). This could be due to an increase in muscle fiber size. The amplitude difference was pronounced in the tibial nerves of football players probably because of higher involvement of lower limbs in the sport, which could have led to regional muscle hypertrophy (34),(35). The present study also revealed that the proximal and distal durations of both tibial nerve CMAPs were lower in athletes. This could be due to higher synchronicity of muscle fibre discharge in the trained individuals (33).

The proximal latencies of both median motor nerves were found to be significantly lower in athletes in present study, which could probably be due to dendrite restructuring and increased neuro-muscular transmission dynamics (29),(36). The results of some studies been outlined in (Table/Fig 10) (37),(38),(39),(40). These studies show that it is also possible to get a reduced MNCV in athletes. This depends on the type of sporting activity pursued, and the associated injuries. Vibrations or shock produced by a hit, as in contact sports, which occur repeatedly can lead to neuropathy that reduces MNCV (37),(38),(39),(40). This is supported by Chang KY et al., who observed that repeated exposure to vibration and shocks, causes degeneration of par anodal myelin and vasoconstriction, apart from their direct detrimental effects (41). Adoption of abnormal postures during the course of a sport, like abduction, external rotation of the shoulder, and wrist extension in hockey players, can stretch the nerves and reduces MNCV (42).

Not many studies evaluating NCV are available in Kerala, India and this adds to the future scope in this field. Athletes from various sports could be recruited and their nerve conduction must be evaluated to see if MNCV varies according to the sport practiced. MNCV could also be used to diagnose subclinical neuropathies in athletes. They are also important in providing objective analysis of skill and co-ordination in sports training. Athletes in present study were trained regularly under supervision and selection was not based on self-reported physical activity. All parameters including MNCV were measured by a single observer using non invasive method of surface electrode stimulation. The results are relevant from a clinical and public health perspective.

Limitation(s)

Sample size was small with 30 subjects in each group. The subjects were all males due to lack of sufficient number of trained female football players who adhere to the inclusion criteria. Handedness of the subject and variation between dominant and non dominant side was not evaluated in this study. Variation in MNCV according to gender could not be documented. The effect of different types of sports on MNCV could not be documented as all athletes were football players. The variation of MNCV based on the type of player (goal keeper, defender, forward etc), and the skill level of player could not be documented. Only a single MNCV reading could be documented per subject due to time and cost limitations. So the change in MNCV, if any, as the athlete trains further could not be documented.

Conclusion

The study highlights an increase in MNCV of football players when compared to sedentary individuals. Proper, efficient and effective physical training can improve not only the cardiopulmonary parameters, but also the neuro-muscular parameters, which directly relates with skill and co-ordination required for increasing athletic performance. It would be enlightening to analyse the potential variation in MNCV of athletes practicing different sports, and study the possible neural adaptation mechanisms so that further scientific support can be extended to athletic training programs.

References

1.
Halar EM, Hammond MC, Dirks S. Physical activity: Its influence on nerve conduction velocity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1985;66:605-09.
2.
Gerchman LB, Edgerton VR, Carrow RE. Effect of physical training on the histochemistry and morphology of ventral motor neurons. Exp Neurol. 1975;49:790-01.[crossref]
3.
Christensen NJ, Galvo H. Sympathetic activity during exercise. Ann Rev Physiol. 1983;44:139-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Arunroj LS. How a penalty shootout is decided in the brain. Deutsches Primatensentrum (DPZ)/German Primate Center. Science Daily. 2019;12:191209110511.
5.
Max WJ, Slutter Nattapong T, Mannes P. Exploring the brain activity related to missing penalty kicks: An fNIRS study. Front Comput Sci. 2021;661466. [crossref]
6.
Kimura J. Electrodiagnosis in diseases of nerve and muscles: Principles and practice. FA Davis, Philadelphia. 1986;2(5):92-96.
7.
Payne IG, Morrow J. Exercise & VO2 max in children: A met analysis. Med Sci Sports Exer. 1993;26:510-14.
8.
DeLisa JA, Mackenzie K, Baran EM. Manual of nerve conduction velocity and clinical neurophysiology. New York. 1994;3:62-64.
9.
Bera K, Shukla A, Raju SB. Cognitive and motor learning in internally-guided motor skills. Front Psychol. 2021;12:604323. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Philip AV, Monica M. Intelligence, reaction times, and peripheral nerve conduction velocity. Intelligence. 1992;16(3):273-88. [crossref]
11.
Thomas JE, Lambert EH. Ulnar nerve conduction velocity and H-reflex in infants and children. J Appl Physiol. 1960;15:01-09. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Taylor PK. Nonlinear effects of age on nerve conduction in adults. J Neurol Sci. 1984;66:223-34. [crossref]
13.
Denys EH. AAEM minimonograph: The influence of temperature in clinical neurophysiology. Muscle Nerve. 1991;14:795-11. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Rivner MH, Swift TR, Crout BO, Rhodes KP. Toward more rational nerve conduction interpretations: The effect of height. Muscle Nerve.1990;13:232-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Robinson LR, Rubner DE, Wahl PW, Fujimoto WY, Stolov WC. Influences of height and gender on normal nerve conduction studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.1993;74:1134-38.
16.
Huang YM, Chang YJ, Chung HH. Nerve conduction velocity investigation in athletes with trained lower extremity for well-controlling movement. ISBS. 2005;503-05.
17.
Soodan JS, Kumar A. Relationship among anthropometric indices and motor nerve conduction velocity of radial and ulnar nerves in aerobic trained athletes. J Exercise Sci and Physiotherapy. 2012;8(1):20-24. [crossref]
18.
Borges LPNC, Vasconcelos WC. Measurement of motor nerve conduction velocity in three different sports. Rev Bras Med Esporte. 2013;19(5):328-31. [crossref]
19.
Gakhar M, Verma SK, Lehri A. A comparison of nerve conduction properties in male and female of 20 to 30 years of age group. J Exercise Science & Physiotherapy. 2014;10(1):16-20. [crossref]
20.
Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Statistic Med. 2004;23(12):1921-86. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Misra UK, Kalita J. Clinical Neurophysiology: Nerve conduction, electromyography and evoked potentials. 2006. Edition: 2nd Publisher: Elsevier India, New Delhi.
22.
Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders. 4th Edition- March 20, 2020. Publisher Elsevier.
23.
Giddings CJ, Gonyea WJ. Morphological observations supporting muscle fiber hyperplasia following weight-lifting exercise in cats. Anat Record. 1992;233:178-95. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Sourkes M, Stewart ZE. Common peroneal neuropathy: A study of selective motor and sensory involvement. Neurol. 1991;41(7):1029-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Ma DM, Liveson JA. Nerve Conduction Handbook. Philadelphia, PA: F.A. Davis; 1983;362-64.
26.
Sale DG, McComos AJ, MacDougall JD, Upton ARM. Neuromuscular adaptation in human thenar muscles following strength training and immobilization. J Appl Physiol. 1982;53(2):419-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Van Meeteren NL, Brakkee JH, Hamers FP, Helders PJ, Gispen WH. Exercise training improves functional recovery and motor nerve conduction velocity after sciatic nerve crush lesion in the rat. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(1):70-77. [crossref]
28.
Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 2006. 11th ed. Chapter 84;1060-63.
29.
Gardiner P, Dai Y, Heckman CJ. Effects of exercise training on α-motoneurons. J Appl Physiol. 2006;101(4):1228-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Ross A, Leveritl M, Riek S. Neural influences on sprint running: Training adaptations and acute responses. Sports Med. 2001;31(6):409-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
Elam RP. Body fat and its relationship to tibial nerve conduction velocity in a specific population. JOSPT. 1987;8(10):495-97. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Wei SH, Jong YJ, Chang YJ. Ulnar nerve conduction velocity in injured baseball pitchers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:21-25. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Sharma D, Paudel BH, Khadka R, Thakur D, Shah DK, Sapkota NK, et al. Nerve conduction studies in lower limb of elite Nepalese football players: An insight into neural adaptations. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2017;57(3):313-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Zachary KP, Garrett MH, Franklin MB, Jason MD. Action potential amplitude as a noninvasive indicator of motor unit-specific hypertrophy. J Neurophysiol. 2016;115(5):2608-14. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Blijham PJ, Ter Laak HJ, Schelhaas HJ, Van Engelen BGM, Stegeman DF, Zwarts MJ. Relation between muscle fiber conduction velocity and fiber size in neuromuscular disorders. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:1837-41. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Aagaard P, Erik BS, Jesper LA, Peter M, Poul DP. Neural adaptation to resistance training: Changes in evoked V-wave and H-reflex responses. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002;92(6):2309-18. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Pawlak M, Kaczmarek D. Field hockey players have different values of ulnar and tibial motor nerve conduction velocity than soccer and tennis players. Archives Italiennes de Biologie. 2010;148:365-76.
38.
Didehdar D, Mostafa S, Taghizede S, Ghaem H. Decreased nerve conduction velocity in football players. ZIRMS. 2014;16(6):85-88.
39.
Singh S, Kaur S. Study of motor nerve conduction velocities of upper extremity in the female archers. Int J Phys Educati Sports Health. 2015;1(6):31-33.
40.
Waghmare VS, Shesha S, Jiwane R, Sadawarte SK, Rahul AS. Effect of table tennis as recreational sport on upper limb nerve conduction velocity. J Cont Med A Dent. 2015;3(1):29-32. [crossref]
41.
Chang KY, Ho ST, Yu HS. Vibration induced neurophysiological and electron microscopical changes in rat peripheral nerves. Occup Environ Med. 1994;51:130-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Topp KS, Boyd BS. Structure and biomechanics of peripheral nerves: Nerve responses to physical stresses and implications for physical therapist practice. Phys Ther. 2006;86:92-09. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57453.16613

Date of Submission: May 04, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 26, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 23, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 05, 2022
• Manual Googling: Jun 22, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 30, 2022 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com