Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 2997

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2022 | Month : March | Volume : 16 | Issue : 3 | Page : EC15 - EC18 Full Version

Surge and Scare of Mucormycosis in the Backdrop of COVID-19 Pandemic


Published: March 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/53266.16088
Ooha Anyapu, Sreedevi Parvatini, Paparatnam Kalivarapu, Rajani Kuna, Jagadeeswari Suvvari

1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Associate Professor and Incharge Head, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. 5. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Rajani Kuna,
Plot No: 343, Purushottham Nagar Colony, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: rajani2dss@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Mucormycosis is a rare opportunistic fungal infection. During the second wave of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), a remarkable increase in mucormycosis cases was observed. Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for both mucormycosis and COVID-19.

Aim: To assess the incidence of mucormycosis cases in COVID-19 infected and non COVID-19 infected patients and also to assess the related co-morbid conditions during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from 15th May 2021 to 15th July 2021 in the Department of Pathology, GGH/Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India. The study included 63 cases of mucor suspects. The parameters analysed in this study were age, sex, COVID-19 status, co-morbidities, steroid status and radiological findings. A descriptive analysis was made from the data obtained. The information was analysed in data spreadsheets using Microsoft office excel 2010.

Results: Out of total 63 mucor suspects, 60 (95.2%) cases tested positive for COVID-19 and 44 (73.3%) cases of them received corticosteroid treatment. Mean age group of 41-50 years with 27 (42.8%) cases with a male preponderance of 49 (77.7%) cases was noted. The most common identified risk factor was diabetes mellitus seen in 22 (34.9%) cases and diabetes associated with hypertension in 14 (22.2%) of the cases. Mucormycosis fungal hyphae were noted in 49 (77.7%) of cases on routine histopathological examination stain and 47 (74.6%) of the cases by special stains for confirmation.

Conclusion: In the present study, it was observed that mucormycosis infection was most commonly seen in COVID-19 infected patients in post COVID-19 phase and also in minority of non COVID-19 infected cases with prior debilitating conditions. Therefore, it was concluded that, mucormycosis was positively associated with COVID-19 infected patients who have co-morbidities like diabetes mellitus and history of steroid usage.

Keywords

Angioinvasion, Coronavirus disease-2019, Cytokine storm, Diabetes mellitus, Fruiting bodies, Grocott-gomori’s methenamine silver stain, Periodic acid-schiff stain

Mucormycosis is a very rare opportunistic fungal infection (1). This angioinvasive infection is caused by fungi of the order Mucorales which includes Rhizopus, Mucor, Rhizomucor, Cunninghamella and Absidia (2). Its incidence differs worldwide from 0.005 to 1.7 per million population. In India, its prevalence is assessed to be 140 per million population which is approximately 80 times greater than in developed countries (3). It is characterised by rapid progression, high morbidity and high mortality in the absence of early diagnosis and treatment (4).

The COVID-19 is caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). It is associated with a wide array of opportunistic fungal pathogens. Main causative organisms for co-infection in people with COVID-19 have been reported as mucormycosis and aspergillus (5). The second wave of COVID-19 has affected India substantially, with the highest number of cases being more than 0.4 million as per May 7, 2021, and has declined since. As our country continues to achieve consistency over the present condition, another impending hazard has emerged in the form of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (6). The rise has been perceived globally, but is exceptionally high in Asian continent. During the second wave of COVID-19, a remarkable increase in mucormycosis cases was observed, which is probably contributed to the immune dysregulation caused by the virus itself and usage corticosteroids, especially in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (7).

India has a very high prevalence rate of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes mellitus is an independent risk factor for both mucormycosis and COVID-19 infection. Following the rise of COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, Government of India directive, has named mucormycosis as a notifiable disease in many states of India on May 10th 2021 (3).

Other risk factors for mucormycosis are organ transplantation, chemotherapy, neutropenia, Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS), long-term high dose corticosteroid use, immunosuppressive therapy, iron overload or haemochromatosis, protein-calorie malnutrition, skin injury due to surgery, burns or wounds. It has emerged as a major life-threatening complication in patients undergoing haemodialysis. Intravenous drug abusers may inject spores and may present with space occupying lesions of Central Nervous System (CNS) (8). In diabetic ketoacidosis, it is demonstrated that the ketone bodies present in these patients are metabolised by a ketone reductase enzyme, which allows them to survive in acidic conditions; therefore, the rhino-cerebral form of mucormycosis mainly occurs in patients with diabetes, particularly diabetic ketoacidosis where the acid base balance is altered (9).

Aim of the study was to assess the various factors that are associated with substantial increase of mucormycosis cases during the second wave of COVID-19 and also to assess the incidence of mucormycosis cases in COVID-19 infected (active infection/post COVID-19 infection) and non infected patients and other co-morbid conditions during the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic.

Material and Methods

This cross-sectional study conducted in the Department of Pathology at Government Medical College, Srikakulam, Andhra Pradesh, India, between 15th May 2021 to 15th July 2021. This study was approved by Institutional Ethics Committee (EC Registration No: ECR/492/Inst/AP/2013/RR-16). A total of 63 specimens of mucor suspects were received from Government general hospital within the study period, Srikakulam in 10% formalin. Various parameters like age and sex, duration of symptoms, COVID-19 status, co-morbidities, steroid status and radiological findings were recorded and analysed in the study.

Inclusion criteria: All cases of mucor suspects which were received from Government General Hospital, Srikakulam to the Department of Pathology during the study period irrespective of age, gender, ethnicity, COVID-19 status, drug usage and associations were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients currently under treatment for mucormycosis, patients diagnosed elsewhere and referred here for treatment purposes, active bleeding at the site of the biopsy, non co-operative and non consent patient were excluded from the study.

Study Procedure

The specimens received in 10% formalin were adequately fixed and the sections were given from representative areas and some specimens were subjected entirely to embedding. The tissues were properly processed and paraffin embedded. Sections of 4-5 μ thickness were cut using a microtome, stained with Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E), subjected to histopathological examination and further confirmed by using special stains for fungal elements with Periodic Acid-Schiff Stain (PAS) and Grocott-Gomori’s Methenamine Silver Stain (GMS). Histological sections were reviewed for the presence and type of inflammation, fungal morphology, angioinvasion and presence of thrombosis and necrosis (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2).

Statistical Analysis

A descriptive analysis was made from the data obtained. The information was analysed in data spreadsheets using Microsoft office excel 2010.

Results

A total of 63 cases of mucor suspects were studied. In the present study, majority of the cases were seen in the age group of 41-50 years contributing to 27 (42.9%) of the cases. The youngest patient was 29-year-old and oldest was 70-year-old (Table/Fig 3).

There was a predominance of male population with 49 (77.8%) of the cases compared to female population which attributed to 14 (22.2%) of the cases.

Out of 63 mucor suspects, 60 (95.2%) tested positive for COVID-19 infection and 3 (4.7%) tested negative for COVID-19. Out of 60 members tested positive for COVID-19 only 11 (17.4%) were in active phase of infection and 49 (81.6%) were in post COVID-19 infection phase.

Out of 60 members who tested positive for COVID-19, 44 (73.3%)members received steroids as part of treatment and 16 (25.3%)members did not receive steroids during hospitalisation owing to less severity of viral infection or due to home isolation. Of the 44 members who received corticosteroid treatment 24 (55.4%) were pre-diagnosed with diabetes mellitus.

Onset of symptoms were most commonly observed within seven days before hospital admission in 34 (54%) of the cases, followed by >28 days in 12 (19%) of the cases (Table/Fig 4).

Diabetes Mellitus seen in 22 (35%) of the cases was the most common identified risk factor, either independently or in association with other co-morbidities like hypertension 14 (23%) (Table/Fig 5).

Most commonly affected sinus in mucormycosis according to CT/Computed Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CT/MRI) findings was maxillary sinus, seen either in isolation in 5 (7.9%) of the cases or in varying combinations with other paranasal sinuses in 52 (82.5%) of the cases (Table/Fig 6).

Maxilla was the most common affected part in 33 (67.3%) of the cases. Each case of mixed infection with both mucormycosis and aspergillus species and isolated infection of aspergillus were also seen (Table/Fig 7).

The (Table/Fig 8) showing mucormycosis fungal hyphae were noted in 49 (77.7%) of the cases on routine histopathological examination by H&E staining and in 47 (74.6%) of the cases by special stains for fungal morphology (Table/Fig 9), (Table/Fig 10).

Discussion

Mucormycosis is a rare opportunistic fungal infection, and its incidence is difficult to calculate precisely (3). In study conducted by Singh AK et al., overall, 101 cases of mucormycosis in people with COVID-19 have been reported, of which 82 cases were from India and 19 from the rest of the world (5). Mucormycosis was predominantly seen in males (78.9%), both in people who were active (59.4%) or recovered (40.6%) from COVID-19. Pre-existing diabetes mellitus was present in 14.9%. Corticosteroid intake for treatment of COVID-19 was recorded in 76.3% of cases. The present study correlated with all the above-mentioned parameters except, a greater number of cases was observed in the people who have already recovered from COVID-19.

In the present study, maximum cases were between 41-50 years with male preponderance and diabetes mellitus identified as major co-morbidity. In a similar study, conducted by Camara-Lemarroy CR et al., the mean age was 39.9. Out of a total 14 cases, nine patients were male ten patients had diabetes mellitus as the underlying disease (10).

In study conducted by Bala K et al., the order of organ involvement is rhino-orbital (61.5%), cutaneous mucormycosis (31%) and mean age of the patients was 40.43 years, with a male predominance of 72% (11). The present study correlated with the above study but we observed the association of COVID-19 exclusively with rhino-mucormycosis.

In the study conducted by Elzein F et al., a total of 18 patients with a median age of 43.5 years (range 13-72 years, 72% males) were identified (12). The present study showed similar results.

A study conducted by Prakash H et al., found that 18% of the cases had diabetic ketoacidosis and 57% of patients had uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (13). Similarly, study conducted by Patel A et al., has shown that, the predisposing factors associated with mucormycosis in Indians include DM (73.5%) (14). These results correlate with the present study.

Mucormycosis comprises a group of infections caused by the fungi belonging to the order Mucorales and family Mucoraceae. Rhizopus oryzae is the most common cause of infection. They are seen in soil and decaying matter and are transmitted by airborne asexual spores. Most common route of entry is through inhalation of spores (15). They are non pathogenic in immunocompetent individuals. In immunosuppressed patients, however, these otherwise non pathogenic organisms can cause a devastating infection with high mortality and morbidity (16).

There are specific pathophysiologic features of COVID-19 that may permit secondary opportunistic fungal infections like mucormycosis. The immune dysregulation associated with COVID-19 leads to decrease of T lymphocytes, CD4+T, and CD8+T cells, which may alter innate immunity (17). CD4+ and CD8+ cells produce cytokines such as Interleukin (IL) 4, IL-10, IL-17 and Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) against the fungal hyphae. The delay in IFN-γ response, prolonged hyperinflammatory state and lower CD4 and CD8 cell numbers may exacerbate the ‘cytokine storm’ and therefore, increase severity of COVID-19 infection (2). Steroid treatment given for COVID-19 patients affects the ability of bronchoalveolar macrophages to prevent germination of the spores (18).

Macrophages provide the first line of defence by phagocytosis and non oxidative killing of germinating sporangiospores. The polymorphonuclear leukocytes play a vital role in killing hyphae after germination by directly damaging walls of hyphae. If macrophages and neutrophils are compromised, the probability of a severe infection is greatly increased (15). Pathogenic mechanisms involved in aggressiveness of the infection include reduction in phagocytic activity, fungal heme oxygenase enzyme, which promotes iron absorption needed for metabolism of the fungus and attainable amounts of iron as a result of displacement of protons by transferrin in patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or diabetic ketoacidosis (2).

Rhinocerebral mucormycosis is the most common clinical form. It originates in paranasal sinuses and then extends orbit, face, nose, or brain. It most commonly presents with purulent or serosanguinous nasal discharge. Black necrotic eschar on the nasal turbinates or palate is very characteristic of this clinical form. Therefore, the name black fungus was given. Spread of infection to eye causes orbital pain, followed by ophthalmoplegia, proptosis, and finally loss of vision. Extension superiorly into the frontal lobe of brain causes lethargy, seizures (19).

On H&E-stained slides, hyphae are seen as broad (6-25 μ in width), aseptate/pauciseptate, thin walled, pleomorphic with irregular, non parallel contours. Branches arise haphazardous, often at right angles to the parent hyphae (15). A hallmark is the presence of extensive angioinvasion with resultant vascular thrombosis and tissue necrosis. This angioinvasion leads to dissemination of hyphae from the original site of infection (18).

In the present study, each case of mixed infection and isolated aspergillus infection was noted. The presence of fruiting bodies gives the definite diagnosis of aspergillus at the histopathology level itself. Fruiting bodies are composed of vesicles and either 1 or 2 layers of phialides that produce conidia (20). Special stains highlight the fungal wall with magenta colour in PAS and black colour in GMS (21).

Limitation(s)

This study has certain limitations. First, Potassium hydroxide (KOH) mount and culture reports were not included in the study. Though, confirmation of mucormycosis was done by relating presenting symptoms of the patient, KOH mount, CT/MRI scan and biopsy results. Second, the sample size of the study was small, due to the specimens received in the Pathology Department were included in the study and during the initial days of the surge of mucormycosis cases, few cases were referred to higher centres due to unavailability of equipment necessary for debridement owing to the rarity of the infection prior to COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion

In the present study, it was observed that mucormycosis infection was most commonly seen in COVID-19 infected patients in post COVID-19 phase and also in minority of non COVID-19 infected cases with prior debilitating conditions. Therefore, it was concluded that mucormycosis was positively associated with COVID-19 infected patients who have co-morbidities like diabetes mellitus and history of steroid usage.

References

1.
Mekki SO, Hassan AA, Falemban A, Alkotani N, Alsharif SM, Haron A, et al. Pulmonary mucormycosis: A case report of a rare infection with potential diagnostic problems. Case Reports in Pathology. 2020;2020:5845394. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Revannavar SM, Supriya PS, Samaga L, Vineeth VK. COVID-19 triggering mucormycosis in a susceptible patient: A new phenomenon in the developing world? BMJ Case Reports. 2021;14(4):e241663. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
World Health Organisation (2021), Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)/Mucormycosis, Retrieved from: https://www.who.int/india/emergencies/coronavirus-disease-(COVID-19)/mucormycosis.
4.
Badiee P, Arastefar A, Jafarian H. Comparison of histopathological analysis, culture and polymerase chain reaction assays to detect mucormycosis in biopsy and blood specimens. Iran J Microbiol. 2013;5(4):406-10.
5.
Singh AK, Singh R, Joshi SR, Misra A. Mucormycosis in COVID-19: A systematic review of cases reported worldwide and in India. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021;15(4):102146. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Kumar S, Anche ST, Syed M, Dutta J, Khan FA, Mali AP. Mucormycosis: A new threat in pandemic. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2021;9(6):131-35.
7.
Asdaq SM, Rajan A, Damodaran A, Kamath SR, Nair KS, Zachariah SM, et al. Identifying mucormycosis severity in Indian COVID-19 patients: A nano-based diagnosis and the necessity for critical therapeutic intervention. Antibiotics. 2021;10(11):1308. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Sugar AM. Mucormycosis. Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14(Suppl 1):S126-29. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Biradar S, Patil SN, Kadeli D. Mucormycosis in a diabetic ketoacidosis patient: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2016;10(5):OD09. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Camara-Lemarroy CR, González-Moreno EI, Rodríguez-Gutiérrez R, Rendón-Ramírez EJ, Ayala-Cortés AS, Fraga-Hernández ML, et al. Clinical features and outcome of mucormycosis. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases. 2014;2014:562610. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Bala K, Chander J, Handa U, Punia RS, Attri AK. A prospective study of mucormycosis in north India: Experience from a tertiary care hospital. Medical Mycology. 2015;53(3):248-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Elzein F, Albarrag A, Kalam K, Arafah M, Al-Baadani A, Eltayeb N, et al. Mucormycosis: An 8-year experience of a tertiary care centre in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2020;13(11):1774-79. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Prakash H, Ghosh AK, Rudramurthy SM, Singh P, Xess I, Savio J, et al. A prospective multicenter study on mucormycosis in India: Epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Medical Mycology. 2019;57(4):395-402. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Patel A, Kaur H, Xess I, Michael JS, Savio J, Rudramurthy S, et al. A multicentre observational study on the epidemiology, risk factors, management and outcomes of mucormycosis in India. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26(7):944-e49. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Frank KM, McAdam AJ, Infectious Diseases, In: Kumar, Abbas, Aster (Eds), Robbins & Cotran pathologic basis of disease, 10th edition, Faridabad: RELIX India Private Limited; 2021, Pp. 387-88.
16.
Hernández JL, Buckley CJ. Mucormycosis.[Updated 2020 Jun 26]. Stat Pearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): Stat Pearls Publishing. 2021.
17.
Mehta S, Pandey A. Rhino-orbital mucormycosis associated with COVID-19. Cureus. 2020;12(9):e10726. [crossref]
18.
Spellberg B, Edwards Jr J, Ibrahim A. Novel perspectives on mucormycosis: Pathophysiology, presentation, and management. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(3):556-69. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Sravani T, Uppin SG, Uppin MS, Sundaram C. Rhinocerebral mucormycosis: Pathology revisited with emphasis on perineural spread. Neurology India. 2014;62(4):383. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Anila KR, Somanathan T, Mathews A, Jayasree K. Fruiting bodies of Aspergillus: An unusual finding in histopathology. Lung India. 2013;30(4):357-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Guarner J, Brandt ME. Histopathologic diagnosis of fungal infections in the 21st century. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011;24(2):247-80. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/53266.16088

Date of Submission: Nov 11, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 09, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 15, 2022
Date of Publishing: Mar 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 19, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 08, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Feb 08, 2022 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com