Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 266099

AbstractConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : YE05 - YE07 Full Version

Postoperative Outcomes Following Preoperative Respiratory Muscle Exercises in Patients Undergoing Abdominal Surgery: A Narrative Review


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51447.15881
Prakashkumar Jayantibhai Patel, VP Hathila

1. PhD Scholar (Parul University) and Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, SPB Physiotherapy College, Surat, Gujarat, India. 2. PhD Guide and Dean, Faculty of Medicine, Parul Institute of Medical Science and Research, Parul University, Vadodara, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prakashkumar Jayantibhai Patel,
Assistant Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, SPB Physiotherapy College,
Surat, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: dr.prakash84@gmail.com

Abstract

Abdominal surgeries are the most common operative procedures including a wide range of both emergency and elective surgical interventions. Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs) following upper abdominal surgery are the most common surgical complications. The combined effect of surgical trauma and anaesthesia results in reduced lung volumes and respiratory muscle dysfunction. Chest physical therapy is widely recommended to prevent and treat PPCs, using a wide variety of techniques and devices, including incentive spirometry, continuous positive airway pressure, positive expiratory pressure, intrapulmonary percussive ventilation and Inspiratory Muscle Training (IMT) using a pressure threshold device that targets the muscles of inspiration. The present narrative review aimed to determine the available literature to evaluate whether preoperative respiratory muscle training is effective on pulmonary function test, Respiratory Muscle Strength (RMS) and preventing PPCs after abdominal surgery. A computer-based literature search was done using the PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Direct and Google Scholar. Relevant articles with full text published in English from 1995 to 2021 were screened and included. Studies were included which had preoperative physiotherapy techniques on patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Editorials, commentaries, discussion papers, conference abstracts, reviews and duplicates were excluded. After screening, only studies with full text articles were included that comprised of nine relevant articles. It is imperative to discover the probable outcome of preoperative respiratory exercises training. Hence, a review could be helpful in delivering a perception about which exercises program could cause improved and enhanced postoperative outcome.

Keywords

Pulmonary function test, Postoperative pulmonary complications, Respiratory muscle strength, Vital capacity

Respiration is a process facilitated by thoracic and abdominal movements. There is division of abdominal muscles in its surgery resulting in pain, limited movements accompanied with alterations in diaphragmatic function and lung atelectasis (1),(2). The most common surgical complications after upper abdominal surgery are Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (PPCs). Hence, the collective consequence of surgical trauma and anaesthesia causes reduced lung volume, dysfunction and atelectasis of respiratory muscle (3),(4). These further replicate into decreased total pulmonary capacities and volumes, reduced Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and Forced Expiratory Volume in first second (FEV1) of expiration (5).

The abdominal muscles attributes to about 20% of breathing. These muscles help to pull on the rib margins and also increase the intra-abdominal pressure. The abdominal muscle contraction leads to decrease in the thoracic volume and transpulmonary pressure, thus reducing the lung volume. There is lateral chest wall expansion during inspiration, wherein anterior stability of abdomen is attained which act as fulcrum for the diaphragmatic action thus, maintaining the zone of apposition (6),(7).

Upper abdominal surgery is associated with a decrease in maximum inspiratory and expiratory muscle pressure (8). The Vital Capacity (VC) and Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) is lessened by 60% and 30%, respectively. There is reduction in the diaphragmatic activity during the postoperative period involving a shift from mostly abdominal to thoracic breathing. The VC is seen to remain low for at least 10 to 14 days along with a restrictive pattern and reduced Inspiratory Capacity (IC), VC, and also a decrease in FRC after abdominal surgery. This decreased efficiency of pulmonary functions is mostly observed after open abdominal surgery than laparoscopic procedure (8).

Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) is recorded by asking the patient to inhale deeply after exhaling to Residual Volume (RV). The lowest pressure achieved and detained for at least one second is documented. The respiratory muscles’ capability to produce force during a short quasi-static reduction is depicted by these maximal respiratory forces like MIP (9). The assessment of RMS is, hence, of utmost clinical importance. A simple, quick and non invasive clinical procedure inclusive of the measurement of MIP to recognise inspiratory muscle strength in both healthy subjects and in patients with pulmonary or neuromuscular diseases (10). The present study is a narrative review on the effect of preoperative respiratory exercises on RMS, pulmonary function and PPC in patients undergoing abdominal surgery.

LITERATURE SEARCH

For this narrative review, the available literature was searched and evaluated to appraise the result of preoperative respiratory muscle exercises. All patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were the subjects of main concern in the study. The interventional studies included the preoperative respiratory exercises rather than the regular care (no training program). The effect of preoperative respiratory muscle exercises on postoperative pulmonary function, RMS and pulmonary complications were recorded as the outcomes of the procedure. The various training programs and likelihood to device such plans in day-to-day practice were also assessed.

A total 256 articles were acknowledged by a complete computerised search on Google Scholar, PubMed Central and Science Direct, National Library of Medicine from 1995 to 2021. Studies were included which had preoperative physiotherapy techniques on patients undergoing abdominal surgery. The keywords that were used included preoperative respiratory exercises, pulmonary function test, RMS, PPC, abdominal surgery. Furthermore, the reference list was also searched to augment the search accuracy, as far as possible. Out of total articles, duplicates, editorials, discussion papers, conference abstracts, reviews and abstracts were excluded, hence, 97 full text articles were screened for eligibility. Out of 97 articles, those not matching with the aim of review were excluded. Articles in which management included preoperative respiratory muscle exercises such as breathing exercises, incentive spirometry exercises with IMT device and chest physiotherapy were included. Finally, 9 articles were reviewed (Table/Fig 1) (11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19).

PREOPERATIVE RESPIRATORY EXERCISES ON PULMONARY FUNCTION TEST AND RMS

Kulkarni SR et al., carried out a study to estimate the consequence of preoperative IMT on respiratory variables particularly in major abdominal surgery patients. The RMS including MIP and Mouth Expiratory Pressure (MEP) and the pulmonary functions were recorded approximately two weeks’ prior major abdominal surgery in 80 patients. The authors equated four groups with dissimilar training schedules: A: control; B: deep breathing exercises; C: incentive spirometry and D: specific IMT. The groups B, C and D consisted of patients who were requested to train twice daily with each session of 15 minutes for at least two weeks prior to surgery. The results showed that in groups A, B and C the MIP did not rise from baseline level to preoperative evaluations. However, in group D, there was a rise in MIP from 51.5 cmH2O (median) before training and to 68.5 cmH2O (median) after training preoperatively with p-value <0.01. Groups A, B and C presented a decreased MIP from baseline p-value <0.01, p-value <0.01 and p-value=0.06, respectively. Although, no such substantial decrease in postoperative MIP was observed in group D (p-value=0.36). These results were made instantly pre and postoperatively. It was thus, concluded that preoperative specific IMT improves the MIP preoperatively and conserves it postoperatively (11).

A study performed by Gehan A et al., examined the consequences of preoperative physical and respiratory therapy on pulmonary functions and also assessed the difficulties after upper abdominal elective laparoscopic surgery in obese patients. The study comprised of two groups: Group I performed respiratory and general exercises for two weeks prior to surgery and Group II was the control group. Slow Vital Capacity (SVC), IC, MIP and MEP and 6-minute walk test were documented as baseline data, after two weeks of exercises and one month postoperative (complications were also noted). The intervention group patients had improved pulmonary function during postoperative period with respect to all parameters than the control group. PPCs occurred in 15 (62%) and 7 (27%) patients in the control group and intervention group respectively. These authors concluded that the pulmonary functions enhanced due to the preoperative physical and respiratory therapy and the occurrence of PPCs reduced (12).

Soares SM et al., investigated the consequences of preoperative physical therapy on pulmonary function and also assessed the physical performance pre and postupper abdominal surgery. Preoperative physical therapy procedure comprised of deep breathing, respiratory muscle exercises, active exercises of the extremities, walking and relaxation. Patients were skilled to use an inspiratory threshold loading device (Threshold IMT, Respironics, NJ, USA) for a time period of 15 minutes daily for respiratory muscle training. This study deduced that patients in the intervention group had higher inspiratory strength and respiratory muscle stamina than control group during the preoperative period (13).

Kundra P et al., designed comparative study to assess the effects of preoperative and postoperative incentive spirometry on lung functions following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in 50 normal healthy adults by the closed envelope method. The study comprised of following two groups: control group (group PO, n=25) and study group (group PR, n=25). The lung functions were recorded at the time of preanaesthetic evaluation, on the day prior to surgery, postoperatively at 6, 24, and 48 hours, and at the time of discharge. Improvement in the lung functions was observed following preoperative incentive spirometry. Lung functions decreased by the time of discharge. Nevertheless, it was seen that lung functions were better preserved in the groups preoperatively at all times. Hence, the lung functions were thought to be well preserved with preoperative incentive spirometry (14).

Fagevik Olsen M et al., observed greater oxygen saturation in patients who were administered prophylactic chest physiotherapy before major abdominal surgery on postoperative days (i.e., day 1, p-value <0.001; days 2 and 3, p-value <0.05). It was seen that there was no difference in peak expiratory flow rate or FVC among both the groups (15).

Kalil-Filho FA et al., performed a study to enhance the physiotherapeutic and muscular capability in chronic obstructive pulmonary muscular inspiration (during preoperative preparation stage of abdominal surgeries). For the bronchial clearance, group A performed slow expiration with an open glottis, acceleration of expiratory flow and forced expiration; for the strengthening of the respiratory muscles, the threshold IMT was performed. Group B performed traditional techniques such as high frequency chest compression, postural drainage and tapping and the flow encouraging Respiron® was performed for the strengthening of the respiratory muscles. There were enhanced MIP values in both the groups after different treatment protocols. Group A showed a greater change during the intervals and an increased substantial rise in the MIP values relative to the regular pre and post-treatment values. Though, after calculating the variance and standard deviation of the samples, it was seen that group B produced best results with more homogeneity. The contemporary and traditional bronchial clearance methods allied with IMT were both highly efficient in obtaining inspiratory muscle strength with augmented MIP. Hence, they could be applied in the preoperative preparation of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and also to patients suggested for abdominal surgeries (16).
PREOPERATIVE RESPIRATORY EXERCISES AND POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS

Fagevik Olsen M et al., suggested that there appears to be substantial variance in PPCs in prophylactic chest physiotherapy patients before any major abdominal surgery (study group consisted of 6% patients with PPCs and in the control group it was 27%) (15). Dronkers J et al., designed a randomised controlled pilot study on the prevention of pulmonary complications following upper abdominal surgery by preoperative intensive IMT. They observed that there were no hostile or deleterious consequences of preoperative IMT and the patients were satisfied with IMT method. The authors suggested that preoperative IMT is well accepted and valued and could decrease the occurrence of atelectasis in patients planned for elective abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery (17).

Chumillas S et al., explored the effectiveness of respiratory restoration in preventing PPC and also defined the benefits of the patients. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation, spirometry, arterial blood gas analysis and simple chest X-rays were recorded from two to three days prior to surgery until the discharge period. The exercises were done for 10 to 15 minutes for four times in a day. The frequency of PPC was seen to be 7.5% in the rehabilitation group and 19.5% in the control group. Respiratory reintegration shields against PPC is thought to be more efficacious in moderate and high risk patients, although there is no effect on surgery induced functional changes (18).

Boden I et al., evaluated the efficiency of a single preoperative physiotherapy session to decrease the PPCs following upper abdominal surgery. Using the Melbourne group score, PPC within 14 days of postoperative care was assessed daily. The study results showed that among the general population group in whom elective upper abdominal surgery was performed, a 30-minute preoperative physiotherapy session provided within prevailing hospital status reduces the frequency of PPCs, especially hospital acquired pneumonia (19).

Even though we have identified most of the available data, there might be many unpublished results and results not available online. We accessed only PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Direct and Google Scholar. Further reviews including data from other databases can be conducted in future.

Conclusion

Preoperative respiratory exercises training facilitates to enhance the pulmonary function in elective abdominal surgical procedures. However, the consequences on RMS and postoperative difficulty remain indistinct. Owing to the increased number of postoperative complications, it is imperative to discover the probable outcome of preoperative respiratory exercises training. Hence, a randomised controlled trial could be helpful in delivering a perception about which exercises program could cause improved and enhanced postoperative outcome.

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge the scholars whose articles are included in references to this manuscript. We are also thankful to authors/editors/publishers of those articles and journals from where the literature for this article has been reviewed. We are extremely thankful to the editorial board of Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research who have helped in the publication of this manuscript.

References

1.
Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Okeson GC, Symmonds RE, Snyder SK, Hendricks JC, et al. Open versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A comparison of postoperative pulmonary function. Ann Surg. 1991;213(6):653-54. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Berggren U, Gordh T, Grama D, Haglund U, Rastad J, Arvidsson, et al. Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: Hospitalisation, sick leave, analgesia response. Br J Surg. 1994;81(9):1362-65. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Hedenstierna G, Edmark L. The effects of anaesthesia and muscle paralysis on respiratory System. Intensive Care Med. 2005;3(10):1327-35. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Saski N, Meyer MJ, Eikermann M. Postoperative respiratory muscle dysfunction. Anaesthesiology. 2013;118(4):961-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
El-Marakby AA, Darwiesh A, Anwar E, Mostafa A, El-Gendy SR, Gaowgzeh RA, et al. Aerobic exercise training and incentive spirometry can control postoperative pulmonary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Middle East J Sci Res. 2013;13(4):459-63.
6.
Overend TJ, Anderson CM, Lucy SD, Bhatia C, Jonsson BI, Timmermans C. The effect of incentive spirometry on postoperative pulmonary complications: A systematic review. Chest. 2001;120(3):971-78. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Drummond GB. The abdominal muscles in anaesthesia and after surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91(1):73-80. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Khanna SK. Efficacy of incentive spirometer in improving pulmonary function after upper abdominal surgery. Indian J Basic Appl Med Res. 2013;3(1):328-34.
9.
American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society. ATS/ERS Statement on respiratory muscle testing. Am J Resp Crit Care. 2002;166(4):518-24. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Raida I, Harik K, Robert A. Determinants of maximal inspiratory pressure- the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Am J Resp Crit Care. 1998;158(5):1459-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Kulkarni SR, Fletcher E, McConnell AK, Poskitt KR, Whyman MR. Preoperative inspiratory muscle training preserves postoperative inspiratory muscle strength following major abdominal surgery a randomised pilot study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92(8):700-05. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Abdelaal GA, Eldahdouh SS. Effects of preoperative physical and respiratory therapy on pulmonary functions and complications after elective laparoscopic upper abdominal surgery in obese patients. Egypt J Chest Dis Tuberc. 2017;66(4):735-38. [crossref]
13.
Soares SM, Nucci LB, da Silva MM, Campacci TC. Pulmonary function and physical performance outcomes with preoperative physical therapy in upper abdominal surgery: A randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(7):616-27. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Kundra P, Vitheeswaran M, Nagappa M, Sistla S. Effect of preoperative and postoperative incentive spirometry on lung functions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2010;20(3):170-72. [crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Fagevik Olsen M, Hahn I, Nordgren S, Lonroth H, Lundholm K. Randomised controlled trial of prophylactic chest physiotherapy in major abdominal surgery. British Journal of Surgery. 1997;84(11):1535-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Kalil-Filho FA, Campos ACL, Tambara EM, Tomé BKA, Treml CJ, Kuretzki CH, et al. Physiotherapeutic approaches and the effects on inspiratory muscle force in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the preoperative preparation for abdominal surgical procedures. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019;32(2):1439. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Dronkers J, Veldman A, Hoberg E, van der Waal C, van Meeteren N. Prevention of pulmonary complications after upper abdominal surgery by preoperative intensive inspiratory muscle training: A randomised controlled pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(2):134-42. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Chumillas S, Ponce JL, Delgado F, Viciano V, Mateu M. Prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications through respiratory rehabilitation: A controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(1):05-09. [crossref]
19.
Boden I, Skinner EH, Browning L, Reeve J, Anderson L, Hill C, et al. Preoperative physiotherapy for the prevention of respiratory complications after upper abdominal surgery: Pragmatic, double blinded, multicenter randomised controlled trial. Brit Med J. 2018;360:j5916. [crossref] [PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51447.15881

Date of Submission: Jul 18, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 25, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 04, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 21, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 09, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 02, 2021 (22%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com