Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 79054

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2022 | Month : January | Volume : 16 | Issue : 1 | Page : YE01 - YE04 Full Version

Sarcopenia- A Growing Geriatric Giant of Society


Published: January 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52964.15859
Kairavi Kishorbhai Trivedi, Subhash Khatri

1. PhD Scholar, Faculty of Physiotherapy, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat India. 2. Principal, Department of Physiotherapy, Nootan College of Physiotherapy, Sankalchand Patel University, Visnagar, Gujarat, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Kairavi Kishorbhai Trivedi,
B-501, Casa Vyoma, Behind Ahmedabad One Mall, Sarkari Vasahat Road, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad-380015, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: kairavitrivedi@gmail.com

Abstract

The process of aging is associated with various structural and functional changes in the body. During aging, loss of muscle tissue and muscle mass make the individual bed bound and physically disabled. The term “sarcopenia” refers to loss of muscle mass, strength and function in older subjects. There are many theories like mitochondrial dysfunction, hormonal changes, decline in neural function, reduced satellite cell function, chronic inflammation support the process of sarcopenia in later life. Though, still the proper pathophysiology remains unclear in sarcopenia. There are various groups of criteria for defining sarcopenia like European Working Group on Sarcopenia Older People (EWGSOP), International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS) and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism-Special Interest Group (ESPEN-SIG), Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS). Among these, AWGS criteria are mainly used for screening of Asian patients. Various non imaging and imaging techniques are also available for diagnosing sarcopenia. Mainly diet, nutrition and physical healthy lifestyle are needed to prevent sarcopenia. In physical therapy aerobic training, resistance training, group therapy, whole body vibration therapy are available for sarcopenia patients. Among these therapies, a combination of diet (protein, amino acids supplements) and endurance training are useful approach. The pathophysiology and diagnostic criteria could be useful to do early detection of the disease in geriatric populations. To reduce severity and avoid further progression of the disease proper treatment options are needed. Further researches are required to develop effective exercise regime for the treatment of sarcopenia.

Keywords

Absorptiometry, Aging, Endurance training, Frailty, Muscle weakness, Physical performance, Physical therapy

Aging is the process during which structural and functional changes occur in the body or organism as a result of passage of time. It is a natural change that begins after adulthood when the body functions start to decline. The classic signs of aging are: impaired vision, impaired hearing, frequent falls and intellectual impairment like dementia or delirium. Frailty can be defined as a stage of vulnerability that can increase the chance of an older person having functional dependency, hospitalisation or death. According to Fried LP et al., frailty have physical phenotypes like weakness (low grip strength), slowness (slow walking speed), shrinking (unintentional weight loss), self- reported exhaustion, low physical activity (1). During aging, muscle tissue is gradually lost, resulting in reduction in mass and strength of muscles and later on reduced capacity for living (2).

In 1989 Irwin Rosenberg coined the term ‘sarcopenia’ from Greek terminology suggesting ‘lack of flesh’ use to describe the decline in lean body mass with age (2). In Greek sarx (flesh) and penia (loss) identify age associated with loss of muscle mass and later on loss of muscle function (3),(4). So, the sequel of sarcopenia may contribute to frailty. In frail older individuals sarcopenia is associated with increased risk of disability and causes mortality (5).

Sarcopenia is also associated with obesity, chronic kidney disease and heart failure especially patients who have type II diabetes (6),(7),(8),(9),(10). Age related changes in body composition, physical illness promotes gain in fat mass which over time promote fat deposition as an adipose tissues in cell. Thus, progressive loss of lean mass causes reduction in muscle strength and physical activity which leads to obesity (6). Factors predisposing patients with chronic kidney disease to the development of sarcopenia include nutritional deficiencies, development of acidosis, vitamin D deficiency and calcium phosphate disorders, insulin resistance, proteinuria and developing inflammatory process (7). Heart failure patients present with various hormonal disturbances which include impaired expression of insulin growth factor, vitamin D deficiency, reduced levels of testosterone and reduced levels of Growth Hormone (GH), all of which contribute to development of sarcopenia (10).

In this 21st century, one can consider reduction in independence in functions and bed bound physical weakness as a major health issue. In research publication there was a huge exponential growth of articles over sarcopenia, frailty or geriatric population from 1995 to 2019. From October 2016, sarcopenia has been recognised as an independent condition in International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) (11).

AETIOLOGY

Sarcopenia is one of the most common problems in geriatric population resulting in adverse effects like frailty, disability, poor quality of life, increased fall risk, hospitalisation, and morbidity and at last mortality (12). There are various potential mechanisms that may contribute to sarcopenia (4). Many factors contribute in the development process of sarcopenia. Loss of motor neurons and muscle fibers, reduced anabolic resistance, impaired regeneration due to reduction in stem cell function, age associated low grade inflammation, and low testosterone concentrations are the contributing factors for sarcopenia (13).

Limpawattana P et al., agrees that after 40 years of age, there is progressive loss of muscle mass which begins at the rate of 8% per decade and it increases up to 15% after the age of 70 years (14). In 2019 Fung FY et al., reported that in Singapore among every three community dwelling, unassisted ambulatory older patients aged 60-89 years and with type II diabetes, nearly one have risk of sarcopenia or pre-sarcopenia (15).

Sheikh N et al., conducted a cross sectional study on prevalence of sarcopenia in an elderly population in rural south India. He concluded that the prevalence of sarcopenia was 14.2% in elderly population above 60 years of age (16). Mijnarends DM et al., conducted a study to examine the association of physical activity with incidents of sarcopenia over a five year period. The sarcopenia incidence rate over five year was 9% and 14.8% in most and least active subject’s respectively (17).

PATHOGENESIS

As an adverse effect of aging, progressive multisystem derangement predisposes the individual towards increased risk of developing many negative health outcomes. Sarcopenia is an age-related decline of muscle mass and function/strength in the body. Von Haehling S et al., supported the fact that several factors are indicated for onset and progression of this sarcopenia, however the exact pathophysiology is still unclear (3).

Aging process not only changes muscle mass but also alters muscle composition, contractile and material properties of muscle. There is a loss of motor units with the process of denervation in aging muscle. These denervated less no. of motor units are recruited, which causes overload on them. This will cause reduction in muscle power and performance. In process of aging, there is a net conversion of fast type II muscle fibers into slow type I fibers resulting in muscle power efficiency in activities of daily living. Deposition of lipids within muscle fibers significantly reduces muscle strength (18).

Siparsky PN et al., mentioned in his study that lower hormone excretion, decrease in muscle synthesis proteins, increasing insulin resistance, and nutritional defects are responsible for decreasing lean body muscle mass. The aging process also convert fast large tension producing type II fibers into small slow contracting type I fibers due to the trophic influence the motor nerve, which accounts for reducing muscle strength with age (18).

Jones TE et al., explained about natural neural mechanisms (death of alpha motor neurons), altered hormone concentrations, increased inflammation, altered nutritional status all of which reduces the mass of muscle and also causes reduction in force production capacity of muscle promoting the occurrence of sarcopenia (19).

Lenk K et al., studied various molecular pathophysiologies for skeletal muscle wasting in sarcopenia and cachexia. Increased oxidative stress causes imbalance of generation and detoxification of muscle cells. Cytokines activity increases muscle wasting and Imbalance occurs in ubiquitin process with aging (20).

Ziaaldini MM et al., conducted a study on biochemical pathways of sarcopenia and their modulation by physical exercises. They concluded that in sarcopenia there is decreased muscle health. There are pathways such as (21).

• Mitochondrial dysfunction {increase Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS), decrease biogenesis}.
• Hormonal changes {increase myostatin, decrease Growth Hormone (GH), Insulin like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1), testosterone, oestrogen}.
• Decline in neural function (decrease motor unit, number of fibers).
• Maturation (decrease protein, calorie intake, vitamin D deficiency).
• Reduced satellite cell function.
• Chronic inflammation {increase Interleukin Factor1? (IL-1?), Interleukin Factor 6 (IL- 6), Tumour Necrosis Factor alpha (TNF-?)}.
• Lifestyle factors (decrease physical capacity, increase obesity, smoking).

CLINICAL DEFINITIONS

According to Santilli V et al., there are three published conceptual definitions of sarcopenia, published by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia Older People (EWGSOP), European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism Special Interest Group (ESPEN-SIG) and International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS) (22).

The EWGSOP has defined sarcopenia as: the presence of low skeletal muscle mass and either low muscle strength (e.g., handgrip) or low muscle performance (e.g., walking speed or muscle power). When all three are present, it is termed severe sarcopenia. When only low muscle mass is present without any effect on strength or performance, it is presarcopenia. EWGSOP consensus, by separating muscle mass, muscle strength and muscle performance, allows broader classification in pre sarcopenia, sarcopenia, and severe sarcopenia.

Chen LK et al., mentioned in their research that, as a result of change in ethnicity, genetic backgrounds, body size, the EWGSOP, IWGS and ESPEN-SIG criteria might not apply to Asians. Therefore in 2014 AWGS published guidelines for diagnosing sarcopenia to foster further research, and treatments for the same (21),(22).

Cut-off values according to Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) criteria, are given in (Table/Fig 1) (21),(23),(24). According to AWGS 2019, Low muscle strength is defined as handgrip strength <28 kg for men and <18 kg for women; low physical performance is either six meter walk <1.0 m/s or Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score ≤9 or five time chair stand test ≥12 seconds. For muscle mass, Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) <7.0 kg/m2 in men and <5.4 kg/m2 in women; and bioimpedance, 7.0 kg/m2 for men and, 5.7 kg/m2 for women. Calf circumference of <34 cm in men and <33 cm in women, SARC-F (Strength, Assistance with walking, Rising from chair, Climbing stairs- falls) ≥4 or SARC-Calf ≥11 are used for screening, which fecilitate identification of people at risk for sarcopenia (25).

ASSESSMENT AND DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA

The EWGSOP and AWGS mainly focus on three dimensions for sarcopenia: 1) muscle mass; 2) muscle strength; 3) physical performance. These components are broadly analysed to diagnose sarcopenia. Available diagnostic tools for sarcopenia are clinical evaluation, Questionnaires like- (SARC-F, Frailty index), physical performance, muscle mass, muscle strength, biochemical markers (blood or serum biomarkers) and imaging techniques (Table/Fig 2) (26).

Boutin RD et al., quoted in his study about various non imaging and imaging diagnostic techniques (25). Non imaging evaluation techniques have been used widely in both research and clinical settings. It includes questionnaires like SARC-F, SPPB tool for physical performance are available, dynamometer for muscle strength measurement, Body Mass Index (BMI) calculations and Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) for muscle mass measurement, serum or urinary biomarkers. Non imaginary tests are not always accurate and reliable, for this reason imaging techniques play an important role to diagnose sarcopenia. Imaging techniques for evaluation of body composition include DEXA scan, sonography, MRI, CT scan. Radiologic examination and imaging analysis for muscle is a potential prognostic biomarker for diagnosing sarcopenia (25),(26).

Every domain like muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance and other biomarkers are needed to assess sarcopenia (Table/Fig 2).

DIFFERENT ADJUNCTS FOR TREATMENT AND REHABILITATION IN SARCOPENIA

There are various interventions and treatments available for sarcopenia. The treatment mainly focuses on improving muscle performance by enhancing muscle strength and muscle mass. Various techniques like physiotherapy interventions, appropriate nutrition, vitamins and pharmaceutical interventions are proposed to manage sarcopenia (27).

Aerobic Training

Chien MY et al., conducted a study in 2010 on older community dwelling individuals and indicated that sarcopenia was associated with physical disability in elderly men. This association between sarcopenia and physical disability manifests as decreased cardiopulmonary fitness. So, patients with sarcopenia also need focus on aerobic capacity of their bodies (28). Aerobic exercises like jogging, swimming, water aerobics are types of exercises which benefit in improving cardiovascular fitness and increased endurance. It increases cross sectional area of muscle fibers, enzyme activity and mitochondrial volume, but it is less likely to increase muscle mass or hypertrophy. Aerobic exercise causes ATP production in mitochondria which improves skeletal muscle health, aerobic capacity and cardiopulmonary function. Harber MP et al., reported in his study that static cycle exercise increased muscle size and strength in both 20-year-old and 74-year-old subjects (29).

Resistance Training

Resistance training or endurance training prevents muscle mass wasting by stimulating muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength. Resistance exercises stimulate protein synthesis in the body and thus maintain muscle mass and strength in body (30). De mello RG et al., have done systemic review on physical exercise intervention on patients with sarcopenia and dyspenia and concluded that resistance training protocols can improve muscle strength and physical performance in elderly patients diagnosed with sarcopenia (31). Clark BC et al., concluded in their study that a well designed progressive resistance training program is well known to produce positive effects on both the nervous and muscular systems and results in profound enhancement in muscle mass and muscle strength. Low intensity resisted exercise should be considered a first line strategy for managing and preventing sarcopenia and dyspenia (32). There are various other studies which consider that resisted exercise treatment is the first line of treatment (19),(28),(32),(33),(34),(35). Limpawattana P et al., suggested in their review article that a combination of aerobic and resisted exercises can be used to improve muscle strength and muscle performance to treat sarcopenia (14). However, there are limited studies available to support that hypothesis. In combination with treatment, a strong study methodology is needed to justify both the techniques.

Many studies have been conducted on effects of group and home based resisted exercise programs in elderly patients with sarcopenia and concluded that group based exercise was more effective than individual home based exercise for improving functional performance (36),(37). A new adjunct called whole body mechanical vibration therapy is also effective in patients with sarcopenia, yet further research is needed in this area in future (38).

Diet and Nutrition

Due to loss of appetite and reduction in digestive capacity older individuals have a tendency for lesser intake of calories which can lead to deficiency of proteins and other nutrients. Preservation of proteins, vitamins and calorie intake is an important aspect of treatment of sarcopenia (39). Dodds R and Sayer AA summarises that there is strong association between healthy diet and physical function (40). Protein supplements, vitamins, nutrients and amino acid supplements are better to maintain the health of muscle components. Another approach about combination of dietary nutrients (carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, vitamins, minerals, water) especially proteins and endurance training program may include good result in physical disability and muscle strength improvement in patients with sarcopenia (39).

Siparsky PN et al., postulated that proper resistance exercise regimens, better nutrition and hormone (androgens) modulation, have great potential to decrease disability associated with sarcopenia (18). Waters DL et al., suggested that resistance training in combination with nutrients supply has the most compelling evidence. Daily intake of 1.2-1.5 gm/kg of protein is required to prevent sarcopenia. According to current recommendation daily dietary protein intake requirement is 0.8 gm/kg/day (41). Liao CD et al., suggested in their meta-analysis effective nutrients and exercise intervention strategies and an interdisciplinary practical approach to counteract muscle loss and functional decline in the elderly population (42). Dalle S et al., suggested that resistance exercise and protein supplementation is the most appropriate classic interventions for treatment in sarcopenia (43).

Conclusion

Sarcopenia is a major threat for older population in developing countries like India. Sarcopenia is a condition with complex aetiology involving neuronal, hormonal, immunological, nutritional and physical activity mechanisms. This condition contributes to the loss of muscle mass, strength, mobility and independence in old age. It can be considered as geriatric syndrome associated with functional impairment, increased risk of fall, fractures, and reduced survival. Different criteria are available to clinically diagnose sarcopenia condition.

Treatment strategies of sarcopenia include multidisciplinary approaches like nutrition, diet modification and progressive resistance training and Aerobic training. Nutritional supplements and resistance training are considered as cornerstone interventions for sarcopenia which can improve overall health and maintain muscle property. Healthy active lifestyle, good exercise training, proper nutritional diet will play a role in preventing development of sarcopenia. In India a few quality research is needed to assess sarcopenia and to understand associated mechanism. More good quality studies are needed further to establish proper treatment strategies and protocol for treating older patients with sarcopenia.

References

1.
Fried LP, Tangen CM, Walston J, Newman AB, Hirsch C, Gottdiener J, et al. Frailty in older adults: Evidence for a phenotype. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(3):M146-57. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Iolascon G, Di Pietro G, Gimigliano F, Mauro GL, Moretti A, Giamattei MT, et al. Physical exercise and sarcopenia in older people: Position paper of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Medicine (OrtoMed). Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014;11(3):215. [crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Von Haehling S, Morley JE, Anker SD. An overview of sarcopenia: Facts and numbers on prevalence and clinical impact. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010;1(2):129-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Marcell TJ. Sarcopenia: Causes, consequences, and preventions. The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. 2003;58(10):M911-16. [crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Von Haehling S. Muscle wasting and sarcopenia in heart failure: A brief overview of the current literature. ESC Heart Failure. 2018;5(6):1074. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Batsis JA, Villareal DT. Sarcopenic obesity in older adults: Aetiology, epidemiology and treatment strategies. Nature Reviews Endocrinology. 2018;14(9):513-37. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Domanski M, Ciechanowski K. Sarcopenia: A major challenge in elderly patients with end-stage renal disease. Journal of Aging Research. 2012. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/754739. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Trierweiler H, Kisielewicz G, Jonasson TH, Petterle RR, Moreira CA, Borba VZ. Sarcopenia: A chronic complication of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome. 2018;10(1):25. [crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Jang HC. Sarcopenia, frailty and diabetes in older adults. Diabetes & Metabolism Journal. 2016;40(3):182-89. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Lena A, Anker MS, Springer J. Muscle wasting and sarcopenia in heart failure-the current state of science. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(18):6549. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Cao L, Morley JE. Sarcopenia is recognised as an independent condition by an international classification of disease, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) code. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17(8):675-77. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Greco EA, Pietschmann P, Migliaccio S. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia increase frailty syndrome in the elderly. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:255. [crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Wackerhage H. Sarcopenia: Causes and treatments. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 2017;68(7-8):178-84. [crossref]
14.
Limpawattana P, Kotruchin P, Pongchaiyakul C. Sarcopenia in Asia. Osteoporosis and sarcopenia. 2015;1(2):92-97. [crossref]
15.
Fung FY, Koh YL, Malhotra R, Ostbye T, Lee PY, Ghazali SS. Prevalence of and factors associated with sarcopenia among multi-ethnic ambulatory older Asians with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting. BMC Geriatrics. 2019;19(1):1-0. [crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Shaikh N, Harshitha R, Bhargava M. Prevalence of sarcopenia in an elderly population in rural South India: A cross-sectional study (version 1; peer review: Awaiting peer review) F1000Research. 2020,9:17. Available at: https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.22580.1. [crossref]
17.
Mijnarends DM, Koster A, Schols JM, Meijers JM, Halfens RJ, Gudnason V, et al. Physical activity and incidence of sarcopenia: The population-based AGES-Reykjavik Study. Age Ageing. 2016;45(5):614-20. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Siparsky PN, Kirkendall DT, Garrett Jr WE. Muscle changes in aging: Understanding sarcopenia. Sports Health. 2014;6(1):36-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Jones TE, Stephenson KW, King JG, Knight KR, Marshall TL, Scott WB. Sarcopenia-mechanisms and treatments. J Geriatr Phys Ther. 2009;32(2):39-45. [crossref]
20.
Lenk K, Schuler G, Adams V. Skeletal muscle wasting in cachexia and sarcopenia: Molecular pathophysiology and impact of exercise training. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2010;1(1):09-21. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Ziaaldini MM, Marzetti E, Picca A, Murlasits Z. Biochemical pathways of sarcopenia and their modulation by physical exercise: A narrative review. Front Med (Lausanne). 2017;4:167. [crossref] [PubMed]
22.
Santilli V, Bernetti A, Mangone M, Paoloni M. Clinical definition of sarcopenia. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab. 2014;11(3):177. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Chen LK, Liu LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, Auyeung TW, Bahyah KS, et al. Sarcopenia in Asia: Consensus report of the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2014;15(2):95-101. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Chen LK, Lee WJ, Peng LN, Liu LK, Arai H, Akishita M. Recent advances in sarcopenia research in Asia: 2016 update from the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2016;17:767.e1-767.e7. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Boutin RD, Yao L, Canter RJ, Lenchik L. Sarcopenia: Current concepts and imaging implications. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2015;205(3):W255-66. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Rossi AP, Rubele S, D'Introno A, Zoico E, Bradimarte P, Amadio G, et al. An update on methods for sarcopenia diagnosis: From bench to bedside. Italian Journal of Medicine. 2018;12(2):97-107. [crossref]
27.
Yu SC, Khow KS, Jadczak AD, Visvanathan R. Clinical screening tools for sarcopenia and its management. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res. 2016;2016:5978523. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Chien MY, Kuo HK, Wu YT. Sarcopenia, cardiopulmonary fitness, and physical disability in community-dwelling elderly people. Physical Therapy. 2010;90(9):1277-87. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Harber MP, Konopka AR, Douglass MD, Minchev K, Kaminsky LA, Trappe TA, et al. Aerobic exercise training improves whole muscle and single myofiber size and function in older women. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2009;297:R1452-59. [crossref] [PubMed]
30.
Yoo SZ, No MH, Heo JW, Park DH, Kang JH, Kim SH. Role of exercise in age-related sarcopenia. Journal of Exercise Rehabilitation. 2018;14(4):551. [crossref] [PubMed]
31.
De Mello RG, Dalla Corte RR, Gioscia J, Moriguchi EH. Effects of physical exercise programs on sarcopenia management, dynapenia, and physical performance in the elderly: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials. Journal of Aging Research. 2019; 2019:1959486. [crossref] [PubMed]
32.
Clark BC, Clark LA, Law TD. Resistance exercise to prevent and manage sarcopenia and dynapenia. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2016;36(1):205-28. [crossref] [PubMed]
33.
Vasconcelos KS, Dias J, Araújo MC, Pinheiro AC, Moreira BS, Dias RC. Effects of a progressive resistance exercise program with high-speed component on the physical function of older women with sarcopenic obesity: A randomized controlled trial. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy. 2016;20:432-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
34.
Aagaard P, Suetta C, Caserotti P, Magnusson SP, Kjær M. Role of the nervous system in sarcopenia and muscle atrophy with aging: Strength training as a countermeasure. Scandinavian journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 2010;20(1):49-64. [crossref] [PubMed]
35.
Phu S, Boersma D, Duque G. Exercise and sarcopenia. Journal of Clinical Densitometry. 2015;18(4):488-92. [crossref] [PubMed]
36.
Burton LA, Sumukadas D. Optimal management of sarcopenia. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2010;5:217. [crossref] [PubMed]
37.
Tsekoura M, Billis E, Tsepis E, Dimitriadis Z, Matzaroglou C, Tyllianakis M, et al. The effects of group and home-based exercise programs in elderly with sarcopenia: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Med. 2018;7(12):480. [crossref] [PubMed]
38.
Wei N, Ng SM, Ng GY, Lee RS, Lau MC, Pang MY. Whole body vibration training improves muscle and physical performance in community dwelling with sarcopenia: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation. 2016;2:01-06. [crossref]
39.
Provan M, Mander T. Mobility, exercise, nutrition and healthy ageing to avoid sarcopenia. Post Reproductive Health. 2018;24(2):98-102. [crossref] [PubMed]
40.
Dodds R, Sayer AA. Sarcopenia and frailty: New challenges for clinical practice. Clinical Medicine. 2016;16(5):455. [crossref] [PubMed]
41.
Waters DL, Baumgartner RN, Garry PJ, Vellas B. Advantages of dietary, exercise-related, and therapeutic interventions to prevent and treat sarcopenia in adult patients: An update. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2010;5:259. [crossref] [PubMed]
42.
Liao CD, Chen HC, Huang SW, Liou TH. The role of muscle mass gain following protein supplementation plus exercise therapy in older adults with sarcopenia and frailty risks: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized trials. Nutrients. 2019;11(8):1713. [crossref] [PubMed]
43.
Dalle S, Rossmeislova L, Koppo K. The role of inflammation in age-related sarcopenia. Frontiers in Physiology. 2017;8:1045. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52964.15859

Date of Submission: Oct 23, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Nov 16, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Dec 15, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2022

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? NA
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 16, 2021
• Manual Googling: Dec 06, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 15, 2021 (21%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com