Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 171572

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2021 | Month : July | Volume : 15 | Issue : 7 | Page : EC49 - EC53 Full Version

Clinical and Histopathogical Characteristics of Salivary Gland Tumours: A Cross-sectional Study


Published: July 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/48240.15180
Sasmita Panda, Subrat Kumar Samantara, Paresh Kumar Behera, Sashibhusan Dash, Sagarika Samantaray

1. Associate Professor, Department of Oncopathology, Acharya Harihar Postgraduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgical Oncopathology, Acharya Harihar Postgraduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 3. Assistant Professor, Department of Head and Neck Oncology, Acharya Harihar Post Graduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 4. Senior Research Fellow, Department of Oncopathology, Acharya Harihar Postgraduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack, Odisha, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Oncopathology, Acharya Harihar Postgraduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mr. Sashibhusan Dash,
Senior Research Fellow, Department of Oncopathology, Acharya Harihar Postgraduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack-753007, Odisha, India.
E-mail: sashibiotech@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Regional record is a useful strategy for the analysis of the clinicohistopathological presentation of Salivary Gland Tumours (SGTs) in a specific population by which appropriate management can be established.

Aim: To investigate the clinicohistopathological presentation of SGTs in a tertiary care cancer centre, Odisha, India.

Materials and Methods: This single centre hospital based cross-sectional study was carried in Acharya Harihar Post-Graduate Institute of Cancer, Cuttack, Odisha, India. Five years (from January 2015 to December 2019) clinical and histopathological data of SGTs were retrieved from hospital record section. The data collection and analysis was done from January 2019 to December 2020. The SGTs cases were classified under the histological criteria suggested by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2017. Count data were expressed as percentages and differences between the groups were compared using the Chi-square test. The results were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) computer software version 17.0.

Results: A total of 319 neoplastic SGTs were included out of which malignant tumours were comprised of 144 (45.14%). Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma (MEC) was the most common malignant type while Pleomorphic Adenomas (PA) was reported as the most common benign type. The mean±SD age of the patients with benign and malignant tumour was 41.94±13.94 years and 46.09±13.33 years, respectively. The percentage of malignant neoplasms in the minor salivary gland was higher (37/60, 61.66%) than benign tumours. while in major salivary glands, it was found (107/259, 41.31%). In major salivary gland, greater involvement of the parotid gland was observed. The mean tumour size of the major SGT was 3.34±1.09 cm wereas the mean tumour size of the minor salivary gland was 2.35±1.26 cm.

Conclusion: The PA and MEC were the most common benign and malignant types respectively. The knowledge regarding histopathological presentation of SGTs in present study would help to pathologist and surgeons for more accurate diagnosis and further management. As, the preoperative diagnosis of SGTs is very challenging,further study in this regard is needed.

Keywords

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, Parotid gland, Pleomorphic adenoma

The Salivary Gland Tumours (SGTs) represent about 6% of head and neck neoplasms and about 0.5% of all malignancies in humans. Mortality depends on the stage and type of the lesion; however, the five years survival rate is estimated to be 72% (1). SGTs are of particular interest to both histopathologists and surgeons because of their heterogeneous histological and biological characteristics and the difficulties involved in management (2). Treatment of this tumour is based on the histological diagnosis. So, correct histological diagnosis is obligatory. Accurate histological diagnosis is dependent on clearly defining the histological cell type and morphological patterns, which is the basis of the 2017 WHO classification of SGTs (3).

Although many retrospective studies regarding the incidence of SGTs have been reported, the epidemiological studies from various parts of the globe revealed, geographical location and ethnic groups influence the incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of SGTs. So, regional records are a useful strategy for the analysis of the distribution and particular features of SGTs in a specific population by which appropriate management can be established (4). In India, there is a paucity of published literature on the regional variation of incidence and clinicopathological characteristics of SGTs (5).

The study objective was to see the regional prevalence of benign and malignant SGTs and their clinicohistopathological presentation. The knowledge regarding the clinicohistopathological factors would not only be helpful for preoperative presumptive diagnosis but also for further appropriate clinical management and prognosis.

Material and Methods

This single centre hospital based cross-sectional study was carried in Acharya Harihar Post-Graduate Institute of Cancer,Cuttack,Odisha.Five years (from January 2015 to December 2019) clinical and histopathological data of SGTs were retrieved from hospital record section. The data collection and analysis was done from January 2019 to December 2020. Histopathological diagnosis and classification of included SGTs were done according to WHO; 2017 guidelines (3). Institutional ethics committee approval was obtained.

Inclusion criteria: Out of the total enrolled cases, only those patients who have presented tumour like lesions in the head and neck region and subsequently diagnosed with neoplastic SGT by histopathology were included.

Exclusion criteria: The synchronous cases, non neoplastic salivary gland lesions, metastatic cases, sick patients, and patients having incomplete data were excluded from this study.

From included cases, the data such as age, sex, anatomical site, tumour size, and histopathological characteristics (tumour type, grade, Perineural Invasion (PNI), Lymphovascular Space Invasion (LVSI), lymph node status) were obtained from the medical record.

Statistical Analysis

Measurement data were expressed as the mean±standard deviation. Count data were expressed as percentages and differences between the groups were compared using the χ2 test. A p-value of <0.05 was defined as statistically significant. The results were analysed using SPSS computer software version 17.0.

Results

A total of 349 SGT cases were included during this study period. Histological diagnosis included 30 (8.59%) cases of non neoplastic lesions and 319 (91.4%) cases of the neoplastic tumour. The clinicopathological characteristics of neoplastic tumours were evaluated in this study. Among neoplastic tumours, benign and malignant tumours were comprised of 175 (54.85%) and 144 (45.14%) respectively. The distribution of benign and malignant SGTs is shown in (Table/Fig 1).

In this study, 153 (47.96%) of affected patients were male and 166 (52.03%) were female. In benign cases, males were slightly predominated over female 94 (53.71%) whereas in malignant cases, females were comprised of 89 (59.02%).This difference was found statistically significant (p-value=0.023).

The age of patients in this study was between 3 and 85 years. The majority of tumours 146 (41.83%) were observed in age between 31 to 50 years. The mean±SD age of the patients with benign tumours was 41.94±13.94 years and it was 46.09±13.33 years in malignant tumours (Table/Fig 1). This difference was found statistically significant (p-value=0.0073).

Forty-three cases (12.32%) were below 18 years of age out of which 29 (67.448%) cases were found to be neoplastic SGTs.

The mean age of male and female in benign tumour was found to be 42.73±14.62 and 41.02±13.03 (p-value=0.4224) while in malignant cases, the mean age of male and female was 48.33±13.13 and 44.52±13.37 years respectively (p-value=0.0924).

The percentage of malignant neoplasms in the minor salivary gland was (37/60, 61.66%) while in major salivary glands, it was found (107/259, 41.31%).On the other hand, maximum numbers (152/259, 58.68%) of benign tumours were observed in the major salivary gland with greater involvement of the parotid gland (119/152,78.28%). The difference was found statistically significant (p-value=0.004307).

The sex difference between major and minor SGTs was not found statistically significant (p-value=0.9649).

The distribution frequencies of 319 salivary gland neoplasms according to the location are shown in (Table/Fig 2).

Average size of benign and malignant tumours was 3.27±1.03 and 3.06±1.29 cm, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found. Mean tumour size of major SGT was 3.34±1.09 with range 0.4-9 cm whereas mean tumour size of minor salivary gland was 2.35±1.26 cm, with range 0.3-6 cm. This difference was found statistically significant (Table/Fig 3).

The presence of regional metastasis was only observed in six malignant major SGTs.

In this study, the researchers attempted to compare and analyse the results of clinical (preoperative diagnosis) and histopathological diagnosis. The result is shown in (Table/Fig 4).

The PA was comprised of the maximum numbers among benign tumours whereas MECs were the highest among malignant tumours. The clinical features and histopathological presentation of benign and malignant SGTs are presented in (Table/Fig 5)a-d, [Table/Fig-56]a-d.

Discussion

We observed dominance of neoplastic lesion, among which benign tumours were predominated. These findings were similar to the previous study reports from India as well as other parts of the globe (5),(6),(7).

On the other hand, Shukla NK et al., found more numbers of malignant tumours (77.5%) than benign tumours while Tilakaratne WM et al., reported an almost equal frequency of benign and malignant tumours (8),(9).

In previous studies, some have reported women predominance with an average of 55.4% while some other authors have reported men predominance (7). It has also reported that, benign tumours are more common in women, while malignant tumours are more common in men (6),(7).

According to a study report by Bobati SS et al., the mean age of malignant and benign tumours was found to be 45 and 35 years, respectively (5). In this study, patients with malignant salivary gland neoplasms were older than patients with benign tumours. But in another study done by Jansisyanont P et al., reported that patients affected by malignant tumours were on average 6 years younger than those affected by benign neoplastic tumours (10). In the paediatric population (<18 years age), no significant sex difference was observed (male to female ratio 1:1.07) in this age group, and the mean age of paediatric patients was 15.1 years while in another study female predilection was observed (male to female ratio 1:1.25) with mean age 13.74 (11). The most common benign tumour was PA, and the most common malignant tumour was MEC. The above findings were similar to the study report from India and other parts of the globe (11).

In this present study, a higher percentage of major SGTs as compared to minor ST'S were found which were similar to the previous study reports (5),(6). But in another study, there was a greater incidence of minor SGTs as compared to major SGTs (12). Unlike other studies, parotid was found the most common among major salivary glands while the palate was found the most commonly affected site among minor salivary glands (5),(13),(14). The percentage of malignant tumours was highest in minor salivary glands, which was consistent with the previous study report (15).

Unlike other studies, PA was found the most common benign SGT with male predilection in both major and minor salivary gland (5),(6),(7),(16).

According to the literature review, it was found relatively rare in children and the majority of cases are occurring in the major salivary gland, especially parotid. It is rare in minor salivary glands and if it occurs, it involves the palatal gland (42.8–68.8%), followed by the upper lip (10.1%) and cheek (5.5%) (16). The PAs of the minor salivary glands typically present as painless submucosal swellings with diameter range from 2-6 cm, but some tumours can be huge. They are usually encapsulated, solitary, well-defined, ovoid, or round masses (17).

In this study, the Warthin tumour was the second most common benign salivary gland neoplasm. Similar findings were observed by different investigators (5),(6).

This tumour was found only in the male and occurred exclusively in the parotid gland which was consistent with the previous study reports (5),(7),(8). But in recent studies, the difference has been on the decline and reached up to 1:1 (18). Warthin tumour has the highest incidence in the early ’60s and occasionally occurs in young patients. In men, the peak incidence is in the 7th decade whereas it is the 6th decade in women.

It has also been described in other extremely uncommon sites, including sub maxillary or sublingual or minor salivary glands (18).

Malignant transformation and the incidence of recurrence after surgical treatment is extremely rare. Partial, subtotal, or total parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve is the best treatment of choice.

Basal Cell Adenoma (BCA) of the salivary gland is a rare neoplasm (1–2%) of all SGTs. According to the study report, the most frequent location of BCA is the parotid gland, followed by the upper lip, Buccal mucosa, lower lip, and palate. This tumour most frequently affects patients between their 5th and 7th decades and most often presents as a slow-growing, asymptomatic, freely movable mass, which is often observed in women above 50 years of age. In contrast to Pleomorphic adenoma, it tends to be multiple and its recurrence rate after surgical excision is high (19).

The MEC was the most common malignant SGT, which was similar to the results of other studies (5),(6),(7). In contrast, to other studies, Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma (ACC) was found the most common malignant SGT (8),(20).

In this study, the preferred localisation of MEC was the major salivary glands which were in agreement with the previous study findings (13),(20). But in another study, MEC cases were most commonly observed in the minor salivary glands (7).

AdCC occurred in equal frequencies in the major and minor glands. However, some studies have shown AdCC to be more common in the minor salivary glands (hard palate, followed by the base of the tongue where up to 96% of all tumours are malignant) than in the sub mandibular and parotid glands. AdCC located in the tongue occurs more frequently in female patients (7),(21). The most frequent clinical feature of AdCC affecting the major salivary gland is reported to be the presence of tumour-usually 2-4 cm at its greatest diameter and intra oral ACC seldom larger than 3 cm at its greatest diameter (22). In this study, two patients were presented >3cm (4 cm in the tongue and 6 cm in the hard palate).

In relation to MEC and AdCC, the other published series have not been able to establish a gender predilection for either lesion (23). But in this study, both tumour types were found female predominance.

Another uncommon epithelial malignant neoplasm of the salivary glands that mostly affects women is ACC. It arises most frequently in the parotid gland, other sites being the sub mandibular gland and minor salivary gland. It is the second most common SGT in children.

The ACC is seen most widely in the 4-6 decades of life affecting women than men in the ratio 3:2. The most common presentation is a well-defined painless solid mass (24). Salivary duct carcinoma is a rare tumour that makes up 1-3% of all malignant SGTs. It occurs more commonly in the parotid gland than in the sub mandibular or minor salivary glands. It may develop from a pre-existing pleomorphic adenoma in some cases, but it can also occurs de novo. Patients are typically elderly men, ranging in age from 55-61 years. It manifests as a rapidly expanding mass that grows rapidly, with the potential for early distant metastases, local recurrence, and a high mortality rate (25).

Carcinoma ex Pleomorphic adenoma (Ca.Ex-PA) is a carcinoma that develops from a benign pleomorphic adenoma that is either primary or recurrent. This tumour most commonly present a firm mass in the parotid gland and creates preoperative diagnostic difficulties. The macroscopic characteristics of this neoplasm are determined by the proportion of adenoma and carcinoma components (26).

The PSCC accounts for less than 1% of SGTs. The parotid gland accounts for about 80% of PSCC cases, while the submandibular gland accounts for 20% (27). Patients with PSCC of the submandibular gland normally present with a heavy, sometimes fixed mass and a one-year or less background. PSCC occurs in the 6th to 8th decades. The male to female ratio is 2:1.

It has been observed that benign tumours tend to be insidious and slow-growing, whereas malignant lesions develop quickly (often in less than a year), stick to deep layers, and have an ulcerated or telangiectatic surface. The most telling sign of cancer is pain.

Moreover, benign tumours were found to be significantly smaller than malignant tumours and disease duration was significantly longer for benign tumours. Regional and distant metastasis is important clinical signs of malignancy, but in our study, none of the cases were presented distant metastasis while regional metastasis was rarely observed (28).

As the most common clinical presentation of both benign and malignant SGTs in this study was a symptom less mass or lump over the affected area. It is very difficult to distinguish the disease on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms. So appropriate surgical intervention should be recommended in patients with parotid tumours clinically suspected to be malignant, and all sub mandibular, sublingual, and minor SGTs.

Limitation(s)

It was a single hospital-based study. Clinicopathological factors related to the prognosis of SGTs were not analysed.

Conclusion

The PA and MEC were the most common benign and malignant types respectively. The knowledge regarding histopathological presentation of SGTs in present study would help pathologist and surgeons for more accurate diagnosis and further management. Still, the preoperative diagnosis of SGTs is challenging. Further study in this regard would help to establish presumptive early diagnostic method.

References

1.
Sowa P, Goroszkiewicz K, Szydelko J, Chechlinska J, Pluta K, Domka W, et al. A review of selected factors of salivary gland tumour formation and malignant transformation. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2897827. [crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Vuhahula EA. Salivary gland tumours in Uganda: Clinical pathological study. Afr Health Sci. 2004;4(1):15-23.
3.
Seethala RR, Stenman G. Update from the 4th Edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Head and Neck Tumours: Tumours of the Salivary Gland. Head & Neck Pathology. 2017;11(1):55-67. [crossref] [PubMed]
4.
Vasconcelos AC, Nör F, Meurer L, Salvadori G, Souza LB, Vargas PA, et al. Clinicopathological analysis of salivary gland tumours over a 15-year period. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30:S1806-83242016000100208. [crossref]
5.
Bobati SS, Patil BV, Dombale VD. Histopathological study of salivary gland tumours. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2017;21:46-50. [crossref] [PubMed]
6.
Laishram RS, Kumar KA, Pukhrambam GD, Laishram S, Debnath K. Pattern of salivary gland tumours in Manipur, India: A 10 year study. South Asian J Cancer. 2013;2(4):250-53. [crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Reinheimer A, Vieira DS, Cordeiro MM, Rivero ER. Retrospective study of 124 cases of salivary gland tumours and literature review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019;11(11):e1025-32. [crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Shukla NK, Hazarika S, Deo S, Kar M, Kumar S, Samaiya A, et al. Salivary gland tumours: profile and management at a tertiary cancer centre. Journal of the Indian Medical Association. 2011;109(6):381-85.
9.
Tilakaratne WM, Jayasooriya PR, Tennakoon TM, Saku T. Epithelial salivary tumours in Sri Lanka: A retrospective study of 713 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108(1):90-98. [crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Jansisyanont P, Blanchaert RH Jr, Ord RA. Intraoral minor salivary gland neoplasm: a single institution experience of 80 cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31(3):257-61. [crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Deng R, Huang X, Hao J, Ding J, Hu Q. Salivary gland neoplasms in children. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(2):511-13. [crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Sardar MA, Ganvir SM, Hazarey VK. A demographic study of salivary gland tumours. SRM J Res Dent Sci. 2018;9:67-73. [crossref]
13.
Subhashraj K. Salivary gland tumours: A single institution experience in India. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;46:635-38. [crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Vaidya AD, Pantvaidya GH, Metgudmath R, Kane SV, D’Cruz AK. Minor salivary gland tumours of the oral cavity: A case series with review of literature. J Can Res Ther. 2012;8(Suppl S2):111-15.
15.
Trenkic Bozinovic M, Krasic D, Katic V, Krstic M. A retrospective review of 139 major and minor salivary gland tumours. Med Glas (Zenica). 2015;12:73-78.
16.
Nonitha S, Yogesh TL, Nandaprasad S, Maheshwari BU, Mahalakshmi IP, Veerabasavaiah BT. Histomorphological comparison of pleomorphic adenoma in major and minor salivary glands of oral cavity: A comparative study. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2019;23:356-62. [crossref] [PubMed]
17.
Khandekar S, Dive A, Munde P, Wankhede ND. Pleomorphic adenoma of the buccal salivary gland. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2015;19(1):111. [crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Raghu AR, Rehani S, Bishen KA, Sagari S. Warthin’s tumour: A case report and review on pathogenesis and its histological subtypes. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(9):ZD37-40. [crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Bhagat Singh AD, Majumdar S, Ghosh AK, Gandi L, Choudaha N, Sharma I, et al. Basal cell adenoma-clinicopathological, immunohistochemical analysis and surgical considerations of a rare salivary gland tumour with review of literature. Niger J Surg. 2015;21(1):31-34. [crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Oliveira FA, Duarte ECB, Taveira CT, Máximo AA, Aquino EC, Alencar RC, et al. Salivary gland tumour: A review of 599 cases in a Brazilian population. Head Neck Pathol. 2009;3:271-75. [crossref] [PubMed]
21.
Sharma P, Jha V, Mandal AK. Clinicopathological correlation of adenoid cystic carcinoma: A notorious masquerader and clinical paradox. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2018;39:276-81. [crossref]
22.
Yaga US, Gollamudi N, Mengji AK, Besta R, Panta P, Prakash B, et al. Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the palate: Case report and review of literature. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;24:106. [crossref] [PubMed]
23.
Araya J, Martinez R, Niklander S, Marshall M, Esguep A. Incidence and prevalence of salivary gland tumours in Valparaiso, Chile. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(5):e532-39. [crossref] [PubMed]
24.
Aravind RM, Narayanan NS, Ravishankar KS, Babu NG. Acinic cell carcinoma of buccal mucosa: An unusual presentation. J Can Res Ther. 2015;11:931-33. [crossref] [PubMed]
25.
Mlika M, Kourda N, Zidi Y, Aloui R, Zneidi N, Rammeh S, et al. Salivary duct carcinoma of the parotid gland. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2012;16(1):134-36. [crossref] [PubMed]
26.
Keerthi R, Raut RP, Vaibhav N, Ghosh A. Carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma: Diagnostic dilemma and treatment protocol. Indian J Dent. 2014;5(3):157-60. [crossref] [PubMed]
27.
Agarwal M, Agarwal L, Saxena R. Primary squamous cell carcinoma of submandibular salivary gland: A case report. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(7):XD01-02. [crossref] [PubMed]
28.
Morais Mde L, Azevedo PR, Carvalho CH, Medeiros L, Lajus T, Costa Ade L. Clinicopathological study of salivary gland tumours: An assessment of 303 patients. Cad Saude Publica. 2011;27(5):1035-40. [crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

10.7860/JCDR/2021/48240.15180

Date of Submission: Dec 23, 2020
Date of Peer Review: Mar 01, 2021
Date of Acceptance: May 20, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2021

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Dec 24, 2020
• Manual Googling: May 13, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jun 12, 2021 (19%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com