Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 72116

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : February | Volume : 6 | Issue : 1 | Page : 61 - 64

Factors Influencing the Career Choices of Medical Graduates

Smitha Bhat, Landric D’souza, Jeffrey Fernandez

1 Dept. of Medicine, Father Muller Medical College Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 2. Year 4 medical student, Father Muller Medical College Mangalore, Karnataka, India, 3. Year 4 medical student, Father Muller Medical College Mangalore, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Smitha Bhat
Dept. of Medicine, Father Muller Medical College
Kankanady, Mangalore – 575002, Karnataka, India.
Phone: +919845162167
E-mail: doctorsmitha@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Objectives: To find subjects preferred by medical graduates for post-graduate specialization; And to find what factors determine these preferences.

Methods: The study was a cross sectional observational analytic study of 250 interns from 5 medical colleges in Mangalore, Karnataka. Participants were chosen randomly from the intern’s registers of these colleges after obtaining IEC approval and permission from the administration of the respective colleges. Questionnaires were administered by interviewers and the data was collected and later analyzed by SPSS 13.

Results: 130 males and 120 female interns responded to the questionnaire. 78.2% (n = 250) felt post-graduation was essential. 95.3% (n = 250) wanted to pursue a clinical specialty with the most preferred specialty being Medicine, Surgery, OBG and Paediatrics. Gender significantly influenced specialty choice with males choosing medicine and surgery (p value <0.005) and females choosing obstetrics and paediatrics (p value <0.005) Factors which influenced specialty choice included job satisfaction (p value <0.005), income, lifestyle friendliness and career prospects.

Conclusion: Post-graduation is an important part of a doctor’s career path. Our study showed that interns predominantly chose clinical specialties like medicine surgery and paediatrics, while very few chose to specialize in pre-clinical and para-clinical subjects. Research and general practiced were among the less preferred options too. Choice of specialty was influenced by factors such as income and future career prospects. Knowing these factors may help in modifying policy in a way that would encourage junior doctors to pursue fields that are under represention, yet essential for medical colleges and for the community.

Keywords

Interns, Specilaization, Post graduation

Introduction
The number of undergraduate medical seats is increasing in many countries, thus increasing the demand for specialty training, and for training and supervision at both graduate and undergraduate levels. Trends in selection of particular specialties have implications in terms of arranging training and supervising positions and information on these trends is necessary to guide policy (1).

The ratio of the post-graduate to undergraduate medical seats in India is 29:100, with the number of medical graduate seats in India are approximately 32,000. Undergraduate medical training in India lasts for 4.5 years, followed by a year of compulsory internship. Internship is within the hospitals attached to the medical college where the student graduates. The intern is posted to all the major specialties. The period of internship also includes working in primary health centres in rural areas.

Post-graduate specialization is perceived as essential for success, and there is high competition for post graduate seats, especially in clinical specialities (2). Factors influencing choice of subject for specialization includes factors like what made the students decide to be a doctor, at what age student chose to study medicine and problems faced during medical school (3). Mangalore is a port city in the state of Karnataka in India. It has an urban population of 619, 664. (4) It is an educational hub with 5 medical colleges. The literacy rate of 94.03% is higher than the national average of 59.5%.

Material and Methods

The study protocol and questionnaire were presented to the Institutional Ethics Committee and approval was obtained to conduct the study.

The questionnaire was designed in three parts. The first part dealt with characteristics such as age, sex, and at what age specialty was decided. The next part inquired about possible future career directions like general practise, post-graduation, research and emigration. The third part consisted of questions was about choice of post-graduate specialization, and factors influencing these choices.

The questionnaire was based on focus group discussions with undergraduate students, medical college faculty, interns and post graduates. The content was also based on literature search for similar studies done in India and other countries.

Permission was obtained from the principals of the 5 medical colleges in Mangalore to administer the questionnaire to the interns of the respective colleges.

An interview administered questionnaire was given to 250 interns out of the total of 600 interns in Mangalore at the time the study was conducted. 50 interns were selected from each from the five medical colleges of Mangalore. Respondents were selected randomly from the interns register. Informed consent was obtained to participate in the study and the questionnaire was administered to the interns. The response rate was 100%. The data was collated and analysed by SPSS 13.

Results

The questionnaire was administered to 250 interns, 50 from each of five medical colleges in Mangalore. There were 130 male respondents and 120 females. The majority (153) of respondents had a family income less than 10 lakhs per annum (p< 0.05). 205 respondents were single, and 25 were either married or in a relationship (p value <0.005)

Of the respondents, 78.2% felt that post-graduation was essential, and were willing to wait for 1-3 years till they got their field of choice. 213 had decided is what post- graduate specialty they would pursue.

When they were asked about what their options would be in the event of not getting a place in a post-graduate program of their choice, 146 said that they would compromise on their choice of subject and opt for an available post-graduate specialization. 44 said they would pay high fees for a management seat. 29 said they would start general practice without further studies.

95.26% of respondents wanted to pursue a clinical specialty. The four most preferred specialties were internal medicine (48), surgery (46), Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ObG) (24) and paediatrics (28). Out Of our 250 respondents, only 10 interns wanted to specialise in a preclinical or paraclinical subject.

38 interns were planning to write for foreign placement exams, and out of all of them 23 of these were male.

It was found that out of the 145 interns who said that the working hours in a particular specialty did not affect their decision, 36 wanted to specialise in surgery, 35 in medicine and 22 in paediatrics. 67% of interns in a relationship considered fixed working hours a major factor while choosing a specialty, whereas only 35% of single interns thought this was an important factor (p<0.05).

113 (45.2%) of the respondents cited job satisfaction as the major reason for choosing a particular specialty ( p< 0.005). 8 said that they were inspired by a teacher in the field, and 9 said that they chose a particular field as the working hours in that field would be more friendly lifestyle.

99 interns said that the prestige associated with a particular field influenced their decision, and 113 said it did not.

120 respondents (48%) said that the prospective income associated with a career in a particular discipline made them choose the specialty. Out of these 23 were interns who would opt for postgraduation in medicine, 19 would take surgery, 15 obstetrics and 11 paediatrics (p-value <0.005).

Discussion

Though choices of post graduate specialisation and the factors affecting these have been studied, most of the prior work has been done a little later in the course of the doctors career, i.e. either while pursuing post graduate residency or after completing the post graduate course. The career choices of medical undergraduate students have also been studied (5), but there has so far been very little published work on the career choices of interns from India.

Internship in India is an important stage in the junior doctor’s career, as specialty preferences tentatively chosen during the undergraduate years are consolidated during the job training year of internship. Additionally, it is after this year that the graduate doctor can attempt forentrance exams for entry to post graduate residency programs. Our study is an attempt to find the preferredpost graduate specialties among interns from 5 medical colleges in Mangalore, Karnataka India, and the factors affecting these choices.

The majority of our respondents felt that post graduation was essential, and only 29 said that they would do general practice if they could not get a post graduate residency seat even after 3 years of completing their MBBS degree. This trend away from general practice is disturbing, as primary care can best be provided at the community level by general practitioners, especially in ruralareas. This may be because it is perceived that income and status are lower in general practice than specialties (6). This trend has been observed in other studies too (7) (8), with too many specialists and too few general practitioners in many developed countries. A report from Australia suggests that increasing the salary of general practitioners, and increasing the practitioners opportunities for procedural and academic work would help to address this imbalance between generalists and specialists (9). This approach would be valid in India too, where there is a shortage of doctors in staff Primary Health Centres and community hospitals (10).

In our study 14.4% interns are planning to write foreign placement exams; all of them are male. Graduates from many medical schools in India aim to immigrate them to countries such as Australia, New Zealand, United States and United Kingdom. In these countries, international medical graduates constitute 23 – 28% of the workforce, and India is one of the countries that contributed the maximum number of graduates (11). Though the immigrating doctors and their host countries benefit, this loss of human resources may reduce the number of qualified heath care professionals in lower income countries. Steps to make more transparent the process of recruitment of health care professionals from low income nations have been proposed, however the fact remains that many highly qualified professionals migrate to the countries that pay the most and offer the greatest scope for professional growth, and a permanent solution to this problem is not curtailing migration, but rather investing the measures that would educate and retain health care professionals in the low income countries (12).

In our study only 10 interns preferred preclinical and paraclinical subjects. The comparatively low number of graduates choosing preclinical and paraclinical specialities are worried,as it may result in a serious deficit of teachers in these fields in the future. Though the Medical council of India (MCI) permits non-medical teachers to be employed in these fields, the number is limited to 30% of the total posts in the departments of anatomy physiology microbiology pathology and pharmacology and 50% in biochemistry (13). These departments face a shortage of teachers in many colleges, and the situation can only worsen further with superannuation of staff, especially if the resulting vacancies cannot be filled, since so few doctors opt for the preclinical and paraclinical fields. Other studies also show an existing or prospective shortage of basic science faculty due to fewer graduate doctors choosing these fields (14) (15). Measures by the government to make these foundation specialities of preclinical and paraclinical subjects more attractive as future career options may help to address this problem.

The low number of doctors (just one of the 250) who would like to pursue research in the future is also a cause for concern. A study done in Ireland also shows that students are poorly motivated to do research, perceiving it to be isolated from patients and clinical medicine (16). However, it has been shown that having research as an undergraduate elective course resulted in an increase in the number of students who would consider research as a career option (17). It has been proposed to integrate basic training in research methodology in the undergraduate curriculum, with additional training for those inclined to pursue research as a full time career (18). Integration of research training in to the Indian medical curriculum may also be considered.

95.26% of our respondents plan to pursue a clinical specialty. This is in contrast to a study of career paths of United States medical graduates which showed a decrease in the number of graduates planning full time clinical practice (19). The four mostcommon specialties chosen were medicine, surgery, obstetrics and gynaecology and paediatrics. This is similar to a study in New Zealand; however in the study of New Zealand many respondents also opted for general practice (20). It is encouraging to note that the four most common specialties in our sample population are the primary specialities of medicine, surgery, ObG and paediatrics, which can be practised effectively at the secondary care level (district hospitals), thus taking the delivery of health care closer to the community level. In contrast, a study on specialty choices of medical graduates in the United States found a general trend away from generalist primary care specialities such as general medicine, general paediatrics and family medicine and a trend towards internal medicine sub specialties. Graduates who planned a career in academic medicine, those who had at least one physician parent and those with higher debt at the end of the course are less likely to choose general medicine, paediatrics and family medicine (8).

58% of our respondents said that the prospective working hours of a particular specialty doesnot affect their decision on whether to pursue that field. Most of these are planning to do medicine, surgery and paediatrics. This result is in contrast with a study on US medical students from 1998–2004, which showed that apart from income, lifestyle is increasingly found to be a determinant of graduate doctors career choices, with specialties such as radi- ology (perceived to be lifestyle friendly) being preferred over specialties like ObG which were considered to be lifestyle unfriendly (21), (22), (1).

Of those who responded to the question on when the specialty was chosen, many had decided during final year of medical school and during internship. 130 had decided by the age of 23 (p<0.005). This contrasts with studies from other countries where 37% chose their future specialty in the first year following graduation, and 43% decided by the 2nd or 3rd year following graduation (23).

Gender played a role in choosing specialty in our study, with male interns opting for medicine and surgery, and female interns preferring obstetrics, paediatrics and surgery. Gender has influenced choice of specialty in other studies too, with a clear gender predilection for certain specialties (24). Studies show that females prefer ObG and paediatrics (25), (26), but anaesthesia is also a common choice in contrast to our study where anaesthesia isone of the least chosen options for female interns. It is interesting to note that though a career in obstetrics and gynaecology involves unpredictable schedules, and long hours, it is one of the most common specialities chosen by women worldwide. This may be because of the perception that women would prefer to be treated by female doctors, thus increasing the demand for female obstetricians.

The gender demographic of applicants to medical school is changing with women already outnumbering men in some countries (27). In the future as the number of graduate doctors becomes predominantly female, there may be a skewed distribution of the specialties chosen and the number of qualified personnel in different fields.

45.2% of our respondents said that job satisfaction was a particular influence for choosing their specialty. Most of these respondents were those who had chosen fields like medicine, surgery and paediatrics. It is a point worth reflecting upon why these fields are more satisfying than high income fields like orthopaedics and radiology. A study on physician career satisfaction has shown a higher level of satisfaction in paediatrics and internal medicine and significantly lower satisfaction in OBG, neurosurgery and critical care medicine. This study also shows that satisfaction was positivelyrelated to income and working in a medical school and negatively associated with more than 50 work hours per week (28). 48% of our respondents said that the income associated with a specialty influenced their decision to choose it, and 164 said that future career prospects played a role in their choice. This is similar to a survey of German medical students which showed that the prime factors affecting specialty choice were a safe income and future prospects. It is worth noting that that income and future career prospects are a major determinant of choice of the post MBBS pathway. Junior doctors may thus take underrepresented but necessary subjects if the pay and career prospects are improved .

Conclusion

Various factors, both intrinsic and extrinsic, influence the future career pathways of newly qualified doctors. The extrinsic factors may be modified by framing policy, so more doctors are encouraged to take underrepresented fields. Additionally, intrinsic factors such as gender play a role. Considering the increasing number of female doctors qualifying in India and worldwide, steps to make it more feasible for female doctors to work in all specialties regardless of their ‘lifestyle friendliness’ would ensure that graduate doctors consider all fields while making their decision about future career pathways. Research , general practice and preclinical and paraclinical specialties are areas that doctors must be encouraged to pursue, and this can be done by framing policy to make these field professionally and financially more viable.

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge the support they have received from the dean, Dr. JP Alva and administration of Father Muller Medical College, Mangalore.

References

1.
Whether or wither some specialties: a survey of Canadian medical student career interest. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8638, USA. BMC Med Educ. 2009 Sept.
2.
Pushpa N. Medical scam just got bigger: PG seats for Rs 2 cr. The Economic Times. 2009 June.
3.
Career decisions by medical students: a profile from India. RAO TV Medical Education:, 1976;10: 284–9.
4.
censusindia.gov.in. [Online] 2011. [Cited: November 17, 2011.]
5.
Kumar R, Dhaliwal U. Career choices of undergraduate medical students. Natl Med J India. 2011;24:3.
6.
Sivey P, Scott A, Witt J, Joyce C, Humphreys J. Why Junior Doctors Don’t Want to Become General Practitioners: A Discrete Choice Experiment from the MABEL Longitudinal Study of Doctors. Melbourne Institute # 17/10. Working Paper.
7.
Pawełczyk A, Pawełczyk T, Bielecki J.Determinants of primary care specialty choice. Poradnia Zdrowia Psychicznego, ZOZ dla Szkół Wyzszych PLMA w Lodzi. : s.n., Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2007 Mar ;22:129.
8.
Jeffe DA, Whelan DB, Andriole AJ. Primary Care Specilaty Choices of United States Medical Graduates., Acad Med, 2010 Jun;85:6.
9.
Medical labour force 2007. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. SI : National health labour force series., 2009.
10.
Datt, Kavita-Bajeli. Shortage of 16,000 doctors in rural India. expressbuzz. [Online] March 9, 2011. [Cited: August 8, 2011.]
11.
Mullan, Fitzhugh, Doctors For The World: Indian Physician Emigration. Health Affairs. 2006:2
12.
Witt J. Addressing the migration of health professionals: the role of working conditions and educational placements. , BMC Public Health. 2009 Nov.
13.
Ananthakrishnan N. Acute shortage of teachers in medical colleges: Existing problems and possible solutions. The National Medical Journal of India. 2007;20:1.
14.
Malamed S, Seiden D. The future of gross anatomy teaching. Clinical Anatomy, 1995;8:4.
15.
Oyebola DD, Adewoye OE. Preference of preclinical medical students for medical specialties and the basic medical sciences., Afr J Med Med Sci, 1998;27.
16.
Burgoyne LN, O’Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online.2010 Sept.
17.
Houlden RL, Raja JB, Collier CP, Clark AF, Waugh JM. Medical students’ perceptions of an undergraduate research elective. Med Teach. 2004 Nov.
18.
Kuhnigk O, Böthern AM, Reimer J, Schäfer I, Biegler A, Jueptner M. et al Benefits and pitfalls of scientific research during undergraduate medical education. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2010;27:5.
19.
Jeffe DB, Andriole DA, Hageman HL, Whelan AJ. The changing paradigm of contemporary U.S. allopathic medical school graduates’ career paths: analysis of the 1997-2004 national AAMC Graduation Questionnaire database. Acad Med, Washington: 2007 Sept;82:9.
20.
Zarkovic A, Child S, Naden G. Career choices of New Zealand junior doctors. N Z Med J. 2006 Feb.
21.
Creed PA, Searle J, Rogers ME. Sept Medical specialty prestige and lifestyle preferences for medical students. Soc Sci Med., Gold Coast Campus, Qld 4222, Australia. 2010Sept.:71:6.
22.
Newton DA, Grayson MS, Thompson LF The variable influence of lifestyle and income on medical students’ career specialty choices: data from two U.S. medical schools, 1998-2004. Acad Med. 2005 Sept; 80:9.
23.
Harris MG, Gavel PH, Young JR., Factors influencing the choice of specialty of Australian medical graduates. Med J Aust. 2005; 183; 295-300.6.
24.
Gjerberg E Medical women – towards full integration? An analysis of the specialty choices made by two cohorts of Norwegian doctors. Soc Sci Med.2001;52:3
25.
Buddeberg-Fische B, Klaghofer R, Abel T, Buddeberg C. , Swiss residents’ speciality choices – impact of gender, personality traits, career motivation and life goals. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct
26.
Fukuda Y, Harada T. Gender differences in specialty preference and mismatch with real needs in Japanese medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2010 Feb
27.
Breier M, Wildschut A. Changing gender profile of medical schools in South Africa. S Afr Med J. 2008 July
28.
Leigh JP, Tancredi DJ, Kravitz RL. Physician career satisfaction within specialties. Center for Healthcare Policy and Research and Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616- 8638, USA: SN, BMC Health Serv Res. 2009. Sept.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/3652:1887.1

FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: NONE.

Date of Submission: Nov 18, 2011
Date of Peer Review: Dec 15, 2011
Date of Acceptance: Dec 25, 2011
Date of Publishing: Feb 15, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com