Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 72573

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesTable and FiguresDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : September | Volume : 6 | Issue : 7 | Page : 1233 - 1236 Full Version

The Knowledge and the Attitude of Youth Couples On/Towards Consanguineous Marriages in the North of Iran

Published: September 1, 2012 | DOI:
Malihe Sedehi, Abbas Ali Keshtkar, Mohamm adJafar Golalipour

1. Researcher, Gorgan Congenital Malformations Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran. E-mail: 2. Tehran Metabolic Research Center, Gorgan Congenital Malformations Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, E-mail: 3. Gorgan Congenital Malformations Research Center, Golestan University of Medical sciences, Gorgan, Iran, E-mail:

Correspondence Address :
Prof. Mohammad Jafar Golalipour
Gorgan Congenital Malformations Research Center,
Golestan University of Medical Sciences.
Gorgan, Iran.
P.O. Box: 49175-1411.
Phone & Fax: + 98(171)4425165, 4421660


Aim: Consanguinity is an important risk factor in genetic diseases and in congenital malformations. This study was done to assess the knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the north of Iran.

Material and Methods: This descriptive-analytic study was carried out on 250 young people (125 couples) in Northern Iran during the year 2008. The information was obtained by a direct interview and the questionnaire included four sections which comprised of 39 closed questions. The data was analyzed by using SPSS, version 11.5 and the Chi-Square test.

Results: Consanguineous marriages were observed in 32.5% of the couples. Consanguineous marriages were determined in 20.87% and 11.63% of the rural and the urban residents respectively. The knowledge of the youth was poor (49.2% of the females and 40% of the males) on the genetic consequences of inbreeding. The results on the attitude of youths showed that 38.8% of the subjects had agreed and that 61.2% of them had disagreed on consanguineous marriages. There was a significant association between the knowledge of the youths and their attitudes towards consanguineous marriages with their ethnicity, education and residency (p<0.05).

Conclusions: This study showed that the knowledge of the youth couples towards consanguineous marriages was poor. Health education programs are needed to improve the knowledge of the youth couples on consanguineous marriages; that they are a potential risk factor in congenital malformations and in genetic diseases in the offspring.


Consanguineous marriage, Youth, knowledge, Attitude, Iran

Congenital malformations are an important cause of offspring mortality, morbidity, bedridden, familial problem and inability (1),(2). Several studies have shown that consanguineous marriages can increase the disability of the offspring due to birth defects (3) and the pro-reproductive mortality (4),(5). A positive association has been shown between the multiple malformations and consanguineous marriages (6). Also, an association between consanguinity and deafness has been reported (7). Consanguineous marriages (familial marriages) are more common in Asia and Africa, particularly among Muslims and to different degrees among Christians and Hindus (8). Consanguineous marriages are not common among people of the Western countries (9). Consanguineous marriages are widely preferred among a majority of the populations in Afghanistan (46.2%) (10) and Turkey (40.7%)(2). In the Arab countries, consanguineous marriages have been reported from (25% to 60%) (11), Syria (35.4%) (12), Jordan (51.25%) (13) and Lebanon (42%) (14), especially among first cousins and so, there are tribal populations in some areas with more prevalence (11). In the Middle East, Iran is one of countries with an elevated grade (38.6%) of inbreeding (15). Also, in Iran Georgian consanguineous marriages have been reported to be up to 23.3 % (16). In our country, the rate of consanguineous marriages is high, in comparison to that in other areas. Thus, it can be considered asone of the most important reasons behind the genetic disorders, birth defects and the infants’ inabilities (15). The knowledge and the attitude of youths is effective in consanguineous marriages. The averages of the knowledge and the attitude in different societies are varying (6). With respect to the important role of consanguineous marriages in congenital diseases and the high rates of some birth defects such as the neural tube defects (NTDs) in this area, this study was done to assess the knowledge and the attitude of youth couples on/towards consanguineous marriages in the north of Iran.

Material and Methods

This descriptive-analytic study was done on 250 young people (125 couples) who were referred to the Gorgan Health Centre for premarital advisory and laboratory tests in Gorgan, Northern Iran, during the year 2008. The ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ethics committee of the Golestan University of Medical Sciences. The subjects were selected by using a simple sampling method. The consent agreement form was submitted by all the participants. All the subjects were young people who were going to get married. Ordinarily, it was necessary for each couple (inhabitants of the urban or the rural areas) to attend these centres for pre-marital tests. The data were obtained by direct interviews. The subjects filled out their personal characteristics and their knowledge, attitude and practice on/towards/on consanguineous marriages with their questions concerning the degree of the relationship, which were obtained through direct interviews.The questionnaire included four sections which comprised of 39 closed questions. The first section included variables of the socio-demographic status, which included age, the level of education and the ethnicity (14 questions).The other sections were about the knowledge (8 questions), attitude (17 questions) and the practice (one question). The Likert method (a five-point scale) was applied to validate the data about the youths’ attitudes. The internal consistency index of the questionnaire was specified by the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient (Knowledge questions: 0.749, Attitude questions: 0.75). Each correct knowledge acquired a score of 2 and each incorrect one acquired a score of 1. The scores of the knowledge questions were varied, about 8 to 16 (8-10 poor, 11-13 moderate,14-16 good knowledge). The scores for the attitude were arranged so that scores of 11-22 were regarded as negative, those of 23-33 were regarded as neutral and those of 30-34 were regarded as positive. A negative attitude was defined as a tendency towards consanguineous marriages and Positive in opposite of it. The data was analyzed by using SPSS, version 11.5 and the Chi square test. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered as significant.


The mean ages of the males and the females were 24.4±4.6 and 20.8±4.8 years, respectively. 47.9% and 52.1% of the subjects resided in the urban and the rural areas, respectively. The frequency of consanguinity of the couples was 32.5%. The data which concerned the youths’ knowledge regarding the consanguineous marriages revealed that 44.6%, 29.2% and 26.3% had a poor, moderate and a favourable knowledge, respectively (Table/Fig 1). A significant association was observed between the youths’ knowledge and their level of education (P<0.05), ethnicity (P<0.002) and their habitat (P<0.05). The subjects with a higher level of education had more knowledge about the genetic outcomes of inbreeding. The data which concerned the youths’ attitude regarding consanguineous marriages revealed that 30.9%, 33.9% and 35% had a good, moderate and a poor attitude, respectively (Table/Fig 2). The data on the youths’ attitude showed that 38.8% had agreed and that 61.2% had disagreed on consanguineous marriages.A significant correlation was seen between the youths’ attitude towards consanguineous marriages and their level of education (P<0.001), ethnicity (P<0.0006), habitat (P<0.05) and their occupation (P<0.05). The percentage of the subjects who agreed to consanguineous marriages was higher in the males (58.3%) than in the females (35.8%). There was a prominent relationship between the youths’ marriages and their parents’ marriages with respect to a consanguineous mating (P<0.05). Furthermore, there was a correlation between their practical and having sisters or brothers with consanguineous married (P<0. 005). 91.7% of the youths who were not in a consanguineous marriage, had a negative attitude towards it. Moreover, the prevalence of the consanguineous marriages was 64.2% in the rural areas, while it was 35.8% in the urban areas. There was a significant association between the type of marriage (consanguineous or non consanguineous) and the ethnicity, habitat and the education of the youths (P<0.05). 56.8% of the parents’ couples with consanguineous marriages had familial relation, but this rate was 24% in the parents’ youths without consanguineous marriages. The knowledge of the youth couples who were in consanguineous marriages was low (15.9%), in comparison to those who were not in consanguineous marriages (84.1%) (P<0.05).


In this study, the rate of the consanguineous marriages was 32.5%. This rate was higher in the north east of Iran (28 %) (1). A study from the whole of Iran which was done during the year 2004, reported that the mean proportion of the consanguineous marriages in the country was 38.6%, ranging from 15.9% in the northern provinces to 47.0% in the eastern provinces (15). The prevalence of consanguineous marriages varies worldwide. Such marriages are rarely reported in north America, the European countries and Australia (17),(18). The rates of the consanguineous marriages are remarkable in the Middle East and in South, Central and West Asia (19). It was found that in the Middle East, Pakistan had the most rates of inbreeding marriages (60%) (20). Qatar (54%) (21) and Saudi Arabia, with a 51.3% rate, came in the next grade (22). Also, the rates of consanguineous marriages were reported to be 30.6% in Turkey, 28.9% in Egypt and 25% in Lebanon (23),(24). The rates of consanguineous marriages in different countries have been depicted in (Table/Fig 3). In our study, it was found that there was a tendency (32.5%) towards consanguineous marriages. The higher tendency towards inbreeding in Iran and other countries could be associated with some traditional beliefs and more family bonds (8), which could be attributed to the poor educational status in the rural areas or to parents who were in consanguineous marriages (9).

In this study, consanguineous marriages were higher in the rural than in the urban areas. Our finding was similar to the finding of a study which was done in Turkey (2). The higher rates of the consanguineous marriages in the rural areas could be due to the low educational status, close families, the culture and the effect of the parents’ positive opinions towards consanguinity. The findings of this study showed the influence of the parents on the marriages of their offspring, which was similar to the finding of a study from Mashhad, north east of Iran (8). In our study, 44.6% of the youths had a poor knowledge on the genetic consequences of inbreeding. This rate was lower than that of another study from Iran (75%) (8). The current study revealed the high attribute to consanguineous marriages. Our finding in this regards, was higher than that of another study from Iran (8). Also, there was a positive association between the inbreeding marriages and the youths’ ethnicity. Similar findings have been reported by Saadat et al. (15). In our study, the poor knowledge of the youth couples on consanguineous marriages may have affected their opinion, whereas a high level of education could have affected the youths’ knowledge and attitude towards non consanguineous marriages . In this study, a good knowledge and attitude were significantly seen in the highly educated people. Although, the influence of the consanguineous marriages in the world is declining over time, it is particularly popular in the Islamic societies and among the poor and less educated populations in the Middle East and in South Asia (19),(21). In spite of the important knowledge towards inbreeding marriages, it can go to a greater probability of congenital malformations (25), 38.8% of the youth agreed that the consanguinity was due to traditional customs and a variety of ethnic and family ties.

In Saudi Arabia, the rate of the second cousins consanguineous marriage is higher than the first cousins marriage (22) but in our study, the first cousins consanguineous marriage took the first place. In this regards, our results were similar to those of other studies from Mashhad, Iran (8) and from Karachi in Pakistan (26). There are high rates of consanguineous marriages in many Arab countries, particularly among the first cousin marriages, which constitute 25%-30% of all the marriages. Qatar, Yemen and United Arab Emirates are the countries with increasing rates of consanguinity in the present generation (25) (Table/Fig 3). Among the muslim population of West Bengal, the consanguineous marriage rate is 7.3% and the marriages among the first cousins constitute 50% of all the marriages (27). This may be due to the religious and the cultural beliefs and the society restrictions in these populations (28).


This study showed that the knowledge and the attitude of youth couples regarding consanguineous marriages is poor. Health educational programs are needed for an increase in the knowledge of young people with regards to consanguineous marriages as the main potential risk factor of genetics disorders and congenital malformations in their offspring.


We appreciate the personnel of Gorgan Health Center. This study was supported by the Deputy of Research, Golestan University of Medical Sciences (35/5035).


Movahedian AH. Mosayebi Z. Yousefian S. Congenital anomalies and consanguineous marriages. KAUMS Journal (FEYZ). 2002;6(3): 84-88.
Alper OM, Erengin H, Manguolu AE, Bilgen T, Cetin Z, Dedeolu N, et al. Consanguineous marriages in the province of Antalya, Turkey. Ann Genet . 2004; 47(2):129-38.
Al-Kandari YY, Crews DE. The effect of consanguinity on the congenital disabilities in the Kuwaiti population. J Biosoc Sci.2011;43, 65–73.
Khoury MJ, Cohen BH, Chase GA, Diamond EL. An epidemiologic approach to the evaluation of the effect of inbreeding on the pre-reproductive mortality. Am J Epidemiol . 1987;125(2):251-62.
Edmond M, de Braekeleer M. The effects of inbreeding on the prereproductive mortality: a case-control study in Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean (Québec, Canada) based on the population registry of 1838-1971. Ann Hum Biol. 1993;20(6):535-43.
Bener A, Hussain R. Consanguineous unions and the child health in the State of Qatar. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol .2006;20(5): 372-328.
Khabori MA, Patton MA. Consanguinity and deafness in Omani children. Int J Audiol. 2008;47(1):30-33.
Hasanzadeh-nazarabadi M, Rezaeetalab GH, Dastfan F. A study on the youths’ knowledge, behavior and attitude towards consanguineous marriages. Iranian J Public Health . 2006;35(3):47-53.
Port KE, Mountain H, Nelson J, Bittles AH. The changing profile of the couples who sought genetic counseling for consanguinity in Australia. Am J Med Genet . 2005;132A (2):159-63.
Saify K, Saadat M. Consanguineous marriages in Afghanistan. J Biosoc Sci . 2012;44(1):73-81.
Al-Gazali L, Hamamy H, Al-Arrayad S . Genetic disorders in the Arab world. BMJ. 2006;333(7573): 831–34.
Othman H, Saadat M. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in Syria. J Biosoc Sci . 2009;41(5):685-92.
Khoury SA, Massad D. Consanguineous marriages in Jordan. Am J Med Genet. 1992;15;43(5):769-75.
Kanaan ZM, Mahfouz R, Tamim H. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages in an underserved area in Lebanon and its association with congenital anomalies. Genet Test . 2008;12(3):367-72.
Saadat M, Ansari-Lari M, Farhud D D. Consanguineous marriages in Iran. Ann Hum Biol. 2004;31(2):263-69.
Rafiee L, Saadat M. The prevalence of consanguineous marriages among the Iranian Georgians. J Biosoc Sci. 2011;43(1):47-50.
Zakzouk S. Consanguinity and hearing impairment in the developing countries: a custom to be discouraged. J Laryngol Otol . 2002;116(10): 811-16.
Port KE, Mountain H, Nelson J, Bittles AH. The changing profile of the couples who sought genetic counseling for consanguinity in Australia. Am J Med Genet. 2005;132A (2):159-63.
Bittles A. Consanguinity and its relevance in clinical genetics. Clin Genet, 2001;60(2):89-98.
Shafi T, Khan MR, Atiq M. Congenital heart disease and its associated malformations in children with cleft lip and palate in Pakistan. Br J Plast Surg . 2003; 56(2):106-09.
Hussain R. The community perceptions of the reasons for the preference for consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci . 1993;31(4):449-61.
Al Husain M, Al Bunyan M. Consanguineous marriages in a Saudi population and the effect of inbreeding on the prenatal and the postnatal mortality. Ann Trop Paediatr . 1997;17(2):155-60.
Donbak L. Consanguinity in Kahramanmaras city, Turkey, and its medical impact. Saudi Med J. 2004;25(12):1991-94.
Simek S, TĂĽre M, Tugrul B, Mercan N, TĂĽre H, Akda B. Consanguineous marriages in Denizli, Turkey. Ann Hum Biol. 1999;26(5):489-91.
Do QT, Iyer S. Joshi S. The Economics of Consanguinity. Policy, Research working paper ; WPS 4085; 2006,1:1-34 .
Hussain R, Bittles AH . The prevalence and the demographic characteristics of the consanguineous marriages in Pakistan. J Biosoc Sci . 1998;30: 261-75.
Mukherjee DP, Das S, Banik SD. The trends of consanguineous marriages in a Sunni Muslim population of West Bengal, India. Anthropol Anz. 2007;65(3):253-62.
Do QT, Iyer S, Joshi S. The economics of consanguineous marriages. World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.:1-28 JEL , Classification Code: J1, I1, O1,2007.
El-Hazmi MA, Al-Swailem AR, Warsy AS, Al-Swailem AM, Sulaimani R, Al-Meshari. AA. Consanguinity among the Saudi Arabian populations. J Med Genet 1995;32:623-26.
Rajab A, Patton MA. A study of consanguinity in the Sultanate of Oman. Ann Hum Biol. 2000 May-Jun;27(3):321-26.
Gunaid AA, Hummad NA, Tamim KA. Consanguineous marriages in the capital city of Sana’a , Yemen. J Biosoc Sci . 2004;36(1):111-21.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4208:2473

Date of Submission: Feb 28, 2012
Date of Peer Review: May 05, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Aug 19, 2012
Date of Publishing: Sep 30, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)