Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23544

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
Knowledge is treasure of a wise man. The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help ones reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journalsNo manuscriptsNo authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : September | Volume : 6 | Issue : 7 | Page : 1132 - 1136 Full Version

A Survey on the Role and the Status of Cadavers in Medical Education: An Indian Scenario


Published: September 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2430
Ashwini Chamanahalli Appaji, Roopa Kulkarni

1. Associate Professor of Anatomy, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, Karnataka, India - 560054. 2. Senior Professor of Anatomy, MS Ramaiah Medical College, Karnataka, India - 560054.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ashwini Chamanahalli Appaji
1465, 5th Main 2nd Stage, 1st E Block,
Rajajinagar, Bangalore, Karnataka, India - 560010.
Phone: 0-9845994708
E-mail: shwinishivaprasad@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction:
Cadavers are very much essential for medical students to learn the anatomy, especially with respect to its relationships. It has also gained scope into other uses in the form of workshops and training for postgraduates in the field of the surgical sciences. In order to know the status and the role of cadavers, a survey was undertaken in randomly selected medical and dental colleges.
Methods:
A prevalidated questionnaire was sent by post to the medical and the dental colleges regarding the status of the cadavers, the courses which were offered,the presence of voluntary body donation programs, their registrations, the concept of organ donation, its practices and the mode of disposal of the cadavers. The data which was thus collected was statistically analyzed by various factors, by using univariate statistical analysis.
Results:
The number of colleges which responded to the questionnaire were 57.3% (n=96). It was noted that 63.8% had just barely sufficient numbers of cadavers for the purpose of dissection during the 1st year of the anatomy course. The ideal student cadaver ratio has been referred to as 10:1, whereas the existing average ratio was 20:1. Only 49% of the institutions had an ideal student cadaver ratio. A voluntary body donation program was observed in 70.9% of the institutions. These institutions were aware of organ donations, mainly in the form of eye donations.
Conclusion:
This study revealed poor conditions for the learning process. The cadavers act as the instruments of learning as well as the donors of life in the form of organ donations. If they are propagated and implemented in the right way, voluntary body donations can be a good source of cadavers.

Keywords

Cadavers, Anatomy, Voluntary body donations

INTRODUCTION
A strong basic science foundation becomes the most essential for the training of effective and competitive medical professionals. A thorough knowledge on the human anatomy can be gained only by exploring the real human body. But the provision of human cadavers for the purpose of study alone is a scarcity. Human cadavers are very much needed to teach anatomy and in the initial period, medical institutions may have tried all methods to procure bodies (1). Many medical schools had encouraged illegal means such as robbery murders and unearthing fresh dead bodies to address the issue of the scarcity of cadavers in the past. In order to avoid this, certain regulations were made in the name of the Anatomy Act (1). Initially, the Anatomy Act was proposed and drafted. It lays down the conditions and the pre-requisites for utilizing the unclaimed bodies for the purpose of dissection (2). This act authorizes the medical colleges which are under the government and other private medical colleges to receive the unclaimed bodies which are in police custody for the purpose of an anatomical examination and dissection and other similar purposes (3), (4). The Mysore Anatomy Act was later modified as the Karnataka Anatomy Act in 1998. As per this act, any unclaimed body can be handed over to an approved institution which is in the gazette by an authorized officer under whose custody the unclaimed body lies. The purpose of handing over the body would be for anatomy dissection or for similar medical education uses (4), (5). Many other states also have this Anatomy Act which serves the same purpose as of the one which has been mentioned above. But there is no legislation which has been made by the central government regarding this. This source of the unclaimed bodies may not be sufficient to match the need of the uprising number of medical colleges and the number of students which have to be taught in each college. As a result, there is a dearth of bodies which are available for study purposes for the medical students. In order to overcome this, there was a revolution that came in as a boon to the field of medical education in the form of voluntary body donation. Voluntary Body Donation is a programme wherein the general population can will their bodies to serve the purpose of medical education and scientific studies. Here, the public is providing the most important resource which is needed for innovation in the medical practice. With all these uses culminating into the service of humanity, the cadavers which are obtained by body donations and unclaimed bodies are precious gifts to humankind. The review of the literature did not reveal any kind of information regarding the status of the cadavers. In this aspect of developing voluntary body donation organizations, a survey was conducted from the medical and the dental colleges of the country.

Material and Methods

A list of the entire medical and the dental colleges in the country was extracted from the Medical Council of India’s website (6). All the institutions were arranged in an alphabetical order. From the list, by employing the simple random sampling procedure, 96 institutions were randomly selected.
The Rationale for the Sample Size
The pilot study which was carried out by the first author to find out the status of the student cadaver ratio revealed that nearly 49% of the colleges had a 10:1 student-cadaver ratio. Based on this, a sample size for the present study was estimated with a precision of ± 10 and a desired confidence level of 95%. The estimated sample size worked out to be 96. A pre-validated questionnaire was prepared regarding the status of the cadavers, the courses which were offered, the presence of voluntary body donation programs, their registrations, the concept of organ donation, its practices and the mode of disposal of the cadavers. The questionnaire was sent to 96 medical and dental colleges in India by post with a preamble which addressed the purpose of doing the survey. The funding for the postal charges and the stationery was provided by the institution. Emails were also sent to the heads of the institutions to avoid a postal delay and misplacements. The questionnaire data which was thus received was collected and thoroughly checked for all the information and any missing information was collected by telephonic communication. Further, the data was entered in an EXCEL file. The data was statistically analyzed through frequency distribution tables and the appropriate percentage was computed. 95% confidence intervals ‘(95% CI) were estimated wherever necessary. The ethical guidelines were adhered to. The confidentiality of the information which was given by the colleges has been maintained.

Results

Out of the 96 medical (M) and dental (D) colleges, only 55 colleges (46-M, 9-D) answered the questionnaire (57.3%). Among all the states, Maharashtra gave the highest number of responses. Since the responses were poor, another effort was made to send the soft copy of the questionnaire by e-mails to the heads of the institutions. The results of the questionnaire have been tabulated as (Table/Fig 1) to(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). Based on the responses, the following inferences were made. The questionnaire was responded to by 57.3% of the colleges (n=96). Out of these colleges, 36.6% had 2 courses and 29.1% had all the 3 courses: medical, dental and physiotherapy courses (Table/Fig 1). 63.79% had just barely sufficient cadavers for the purpose of dissection during the 1st year of the anatomy course. The ideal student cadaver ratio has been referred to as 10:1, whereas the existing average ratio was 20:1 (it ranged from 8:1 to 50:1). Only 49% of the institutions had an ideal student cadaver ratio. Most of the colleges had a mixture of unclaimed and donated bodies (41.81%) (Table/Fig 2). Voluntary body donation programs were observed in 70.9% of the institutions (Table/Fig 3). The colleges which had voluntary body donations had them in the early stages. The institutions with 300 and above registrations were barely 5.12%. Most of the institutions had less than 100 registrations (Table/Fig 4). The institutions were aware of organ donations, but only a few were practicing it, mainly in the form of eye donations (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The Requirement of Cadavers
Cadavers are needed for dissection through which the medical students study the human body and the relationship of the structures with each other. Apart from this, the cadavers may be used to practice surgical procedures and endoscopy. Cadaver workshops are conducted by the institutes which teach the surgical sciences, to train postgraduates. A cadaver workshop was conducted to teach bedside procedures and its effect was evaluated. It was seen that the workshop was effective for the students in acquiring knowledge, skills and attitude towards the bedside procedures (7). In this way, cadavers can be utilized in many ways for the development of the proficiency of the skills in medical science. The colleges with all the courses (medical, dental and physiotherapy) were 29.1%, two courses were 36.4% and one course were 32.7%’. The cadavers are essential for the medical, dental and the physiotherapy courses [TableFig-1]. 63.8% had just barely sufficient cadavers for the purpose of dissection during the 1st year of the anatomy course.As per the consensus which was obtained, to the best of our knowledge, the review of literature has revealed that there was no information regarding the studies which had been carried out in this direction. As such, the findings of the present study could not be compared with any of the published findings. The ideal student cadaver ratio was referred to as 10:1 (it ranged has been from 5:1 to 20:1), whereas the existing average ratio was 20:1 (it ranged from 8:1 to 50:1). An ideal student cadaver ratio was seen in 49% of the institutions. When they were asked about the necessity of cadaver dissections, the institutions unanimously opined positively for cadaver dissections. They responded that cadaveric dissections could not be replaced by any of the virtual methods. The virtual methods could only be of assistance to the cadaveric dissections; they could not replace them. From the above said data, it was quite obvious that there was a dearth of cadavers. The existing cadavers are no match to the need of cadavers. And the paradox is that though there are many pro-technology assisted methods of visualizing the human body, experts still feel that the cadaver dissection method of learning is the gold standard. So, definitely there is an enormous need of cadavers. A-V aids and virtual dissection methods can never replace the conventional dissection method.
Sources of the Cadavers
Initially, the major source of the cadavers for the purpose of medical education was mainly unclaimed bodes, as per the Anatomy Act. The Anatomy Act mentions that the unclaimed bodies which are in police custody should be utilized for the purpose of dissections. But the rules being stringent, the rights being transferred to the government run medical colleges and the rising number of the private colleges, there is a shortage of bodies. As a result, the new concept of voluntary body donations came into existence, wherein the general population would pledge their bodies for medical education after their demise. A 3-year analysis of the source of cadavers for medical education by the University of Ibadan revealed that unclaimed bodies and accident victims were the main sources (8). In the recent years in India, cadavers are procured mainly by three ways, obtaining unclaimed bodies, buying them and from body donations. From the survey results, it was revealed that 41.81% of the institutions had a combination of donated and unclaimed bodies (Table/Fig 2). This was followed by donated bodies and buying bodies from other institutions. Certain states have restricted the right to the unclaimed bodies to the government medical colleges and their further distribution is made to other institutions on payment. All these suggest that donated bodies are a potential source of bodies and that if they are propagated in the right way, they may address the issue of the scarcity of bodies.
The Concept of Body Donation
The practice of body donation has been in existence from decade, but it has been in limelight only from the past few years. As of now, it is still in the budding stage. Data analysis has revealed that 70.90% institutions had voluntary body donations [Table/Fig-3]. But when the details were asked regarding the number of registrations per year and the male female ratio, it was revealed that the registrations ranged from just five to 1551, with an average of 80-100 registrations (Table/Fig 4). Most of the voluntary body organizations have been held at an institutional level, with none at the district or the state level. The male: female ratio has been found to be 1.78. All these suggest that the concept of voluntary body donation exists; awareness through conducting programs at the media level and giving talks to different organizations would assist and favor the increase in the number of registrations. Many sections of the population are still not aware of this concept, while some are aware and they are restricted by traditional concepts. A continued motivation would help them in bringing them out of their conservative nutshell. There have been voluntary body donation organizations at the institutional level, but none at the district, state or the national level. If there is body donation organization at the district level, a concept which is called body pooling can be done. If all the medical, dental and the physiotherapy colleges become members and open such an organization, then the whole process of the registration, receiving of the bodies and the storage of the same can be done under one roof. Through this, every college has a fair chance to get the required number of bodes as per the MCI standards. A cadaver lab can be constituted, where the surgical and the endoscopy trainees can register with nominal fees and practice under supervision. As a result, the students at the undergraduate and the postgraduate levels will be facilitated in the development of the proficiency of cognitive and psychomotor skills.
Other Uses of the Cadaver-Organ Donation
Organ donation is defined as the donation of organs after death to the needy. This is also called as cadaver organ donation, as the donation happens after brain death. Many organs like eyes, kidneys, liver, pancreas, heart valves, skin and intestines can be donated. But the awareness is such that many people are ignorant about organ donation. When medical institutions were surveyed, it was seen that 67.27% of them were aware of the concept of organ donation. When the existence of organ donation programs in the institutions was explored, only 45.94% of the institutions who were aware of organ donations were found to be practicing them, that too in the form of eye donations (Table/Fig 5). Donations with respect to the other organs were almost not done. This could be because of a lack of technical knowledge regarding the concept of organ donations. The necessary infrastructure which was needed may not have been existent in the institutions. With the number of people who needed organs, who were on the waiting list increasing year by year, there is a need to raise the issue of organ donation at the regulatory body levels, so that the implementation occurred in all the capable institutions. The need of organs has increased over the number of the potential organ donors, which could be because of a decrease in the potential organ donors. This could be because of an increase in the safety measures of the traffic rules, resulting in a decrease in the road traffic accidents that were usually prone to the brain dead criteria. This scenario indicates that more interest and regulations need to be sketched out to increase the number of potential donors. One main reason for the decreased consent to the organ donation by the potential donors is that the decision is made by the relatives of the donors. The relatives being in an emotional shock of losing their dear ones do not have clarity of mind and also are not aware of the potential donor’s last wishes. They are in a dilemma whether the dear ones wanted to donate organs or not. As a result, the rejection rate for organ donation is on the raise (9). In order to avoid such circumstances of losing potential donors, countries like the United States, are now proposing a legislation of mandatory choice and the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act, which states that the control or the decision to donate organs can be made by the donors than the donor’s relatives. Even after the establishment of the act, the relatives still try to meddle with the decision after the death of the potential donors. This uses the mandatory choice which is asked in the form of a question in certain government application forms such as the driver license application, etc. This method gives an individualistic approach to the decision of organ donation after death, which needs to be honoured (10). This would go with the rule of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association, which states that “the individual’s interest in controlling the disposition of his or her own body and property after death suggests that it is ethically preferable for the individual, rather than the family, to decide to donate organs”. Strategies for cadaveric organ procurement (11). This is because the public’s willingness to donate is high but it is not happening to the same extent in reality at the time of death, the reason being that which has already been mentioned above. All this can be done by increasing the awareness, not only of the public but also of the professionals, especially the health care professionals in terms of identifying a potential organ donor, approaching the relatives and turning the legislation of mandatory choice into action. With these methods being implemented, definitely the difference in the ratio of the organ receivers to the organ donation will be nullified.
Body Disposal Methods
There has been a lot of discussion on the mode of disposal of the remains of the bodies after their dissections. When an opinion was asked, incineration was suggested as the ideal method. In practicality, incineration was implemented in 45.45% institutions, deep burial in 30.90% and a mixture of both in a few of the institutions. The reason behind the deep burial was that the bony skeletons could be retrieved after the complete decomposition of the bodies. Thus, the acquired bones could be used for the study of osteology as well as for research. Experts have mentioned that such bones tend to become porous. Safe Management of Health Care Waste-Information and Learning Units have prescribed the rules for the disposal of biomedical waste under the BIOMEDICAL WASTE (Management and Handling) RULES, 1998, Ministry of Forests and Environments, Government of India, July 27, 1998. They have been stated under the Schedules I and II (under rules 5 and 6). These mention that incineration and deep burial are the treatment and the disposal options for human anatomical waste. The human anatomical waste includes cadavers and the waste which remains after dissection and research (12). But the paradox is that a clause has been mentioned that before the incineration, no chemical treatment should be done. But the human cadavers of the Department of Anatomy are pretreated with formalin and other chemicals. In the standards of incineration, it has been specifically stated that all wastes which have to be incinerated should not be treated with chlorinated disinfectants. This might indicate that formalin might not have a toxic effect of releasing dioxanes and furones into the waste gas which is released by the secondary chamber of incineration. Deep burial can be an option in towns where the population is less than 5 lakh. The standards of deep burial indicate that it should be done in a trench which is 2 meters deep. The trench should be only half filled with waste and covered within 50cm on the surface with lime before the rest of the pit is covered with soil (12).

Conclusion

From the above discussion, it is obvious that cadavers have a major role to play, not only as the instruments of learning, but also in the life giving concept of organ donation. There is a need for creating an increased awareness on voluntary body donation. The colleges which have this program have only few registrations. By developing a VBD programme in each institute, the dearth of the cadavers can be solved to a major extent. Public campaigns and the use of media for the creation of the awareness will definitely benefit the institutions. A concept of cadaver pooling can be considered at the district/state level and at the national level, so that the cadaver shortage problems may be solved. The need of cadavers is essential not only for the purpose of dissection, but also for research and the training of the students with respect to surgical and bedside procedures. For organ donation, awareness and the implementation of rules such as a mandated choice can be used effectively, if the decision is taken to make legislation at the central government level.

Acknowledgement

I thank the institution and Dr S Kumar –President-Medical Education, sincerely for the encouragement and the financial support which was provided, which was very much essential for collecting the required data for this study. I also thank Dr. N.S. Murthy, Director, Research, M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, for his valuable guidance and suggestions while carrying out this project.

References

1] Dasgupta N. Unclaimed bodies at the anatomy table. JAMA.2004 Jan; 291(1):122.

2.
Ajita RY, Singh I. Body donation and its relevance in anatomy learning – A Review. J.Anat.Soc.India. 2007; 56 (1):44-47.
3.
The Mysore Anatomy Act. 1957. Anatomica Karnataka 2002; 1(3): 66-69.
4.
Kerridge IH, Saul P, Lowe M, Williams MD. Death, dying and donation: Organ transplantation and the diagnosis of death. J Med Ethics. 2002 April; 28(2): 89-94.
5.
The Karnataka Anatomy (Amendment) Act, 1998. Anatomical Karnataka .2000; 1(1):32-33.
6.
List of the colleges which teach MBBS (internet). India (cited in March 2009), Available from http://www.mciindia.org/InformationDesk/ MedicalCollegeHospitals/ListofCollegesTeachingMBBS.aspx.
7.
Oxentenko AS, Ebbert JO, Ward LE, Pankratz VS, Wood KE. A multidimensional workshop which was conducted by using human cadavers to teach bedside procedures. Teach Learn Medicine. 2003; 15(2):127-30.
8.
Osuagwu FC, Imosemi IO, Oladejo OW. Sources of the cadavers which were used for dissection at the Ibadan Medical School, Nigeria – analysis of a three-year data. AJBR. 2004 Mar; 7: 93-95.
9.
Klassen AC, Klassen DK. Who are the donors in organ donation? The family’s perspective in the mandated choice. Ann of Intern Med. 1996 July; 125(1):70-73.
10.
Spital A. The mandated choice for organ donation: Time to give it a try. Ann of Intern Med. 1996 Jul; 125 (1): 66-69.
11.
The mandated choice and the presumed consent for organ donation. A CEJA report. American Medical Association. JAMA, 1994 Sept; 272(10):809-12.
12.
Prutvish S, Gopinath D, Girish N, Rao JM, Bineesha P, Shivaram C, Safe management of the health care waste-information and the learning units. A working manual for the hospital waste disposal. Bangalore: Health Care Waste Management Cell, M S Ramaiah Medical College; 2009.

DOI and Others

ID: JCDR/2012/4465:2430

Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS:
None.
Date of Submission: May 04, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Jun 07, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jul 28, 2012
Date of Publishing: Sep 30, 2012

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com