Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 47245

AbstractMaterial and MethodsDiscussionConclusionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2012 | Month : May | Volume : 6 | Issue : 4 | Page : 564 - 567

A Study of the Accessory Muscles in the Flexor Compartment of the Forearm

Umapathy Sembian, Srimathi T., Muhil M., Nalina Kumari S.D., Thirumalaikolundu Subramanian

1. Assistant Professor, Dept of Anatomy, Chennai Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Trichy, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Dept of Anatomy, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India. 3. Associate Professor, Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Trichy, India. 4. Professor & H.O.D (Anatomy),Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Trichy, India. 5. Professor & H.O.D (Gen Medicine), Chennai Medical College Hospital & Research Centre, Trichy, India.

Correspondence Address :
Umapathy Sembian
G-1, Staff Quarters, Chennai Medical College Hospital &
Research Centre, Irungalur, Trichy, India -621105.
Phone: 9789832616
E-mail: umapathysembian@yahoo.in

Abstract

Aim: To ascertain the prevalence of the accessory muscles in the flexor (anterior) compartment of the forearm. A wide array of the supernumerary muscles has been described in the anatomical, surgical and radiological literatures. In a vast majority of the cases, the accessory muscles are asymptomatic and they represent incidental findings at surgery or imaging. Hence, this study was taken up to access the occurrence of the accessory muscles in the flexor compartment of the forearm.

Materials and Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Chennai Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Trichy and in the Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India. This study was conducted from 2006 to 2012 for a period of seven years in the Department of Anatomy. During the routine cadaveric dissection for undergraduate teaching in one hundred cadavers for a period of seven years, we studied the presence of abnormal variations in the muscular pattern of the anterior compartment of the forearm. All the upper limbs were dis-articulated and were tagged for their respective sexes and numbers. Among the 100 cadavers, 90 belonged to the male sex, whereas 10 belonged to the female sex. In a total of 200 upper limbs: 100 limbs to the right side and 100 limbs to the left side. Upper limbs which exhibited fractures both pre mortem as well post mortem, those with an obscuring pathology, previous surgical scars, and congenital deformities and partially amputated limbs were excluded from our study.

Methods: During the routine undergraduate dissection, we studied the muscular pattern in all the upper limbs. After making an incision in the skin, the superficial fascia and the deep fascia were reflected, thus exposing the flexor muscle compartment. A thorough investigation was carried out to verify all the two layers of muscles, both the superficial layer and the deep layer. The investigation included the questions (a) whether the muscles for that compartment were present or not (absence), and if present its both proximal and distal attachments, (b) if there is any acessory muscles present, its attachments. Results: In our study, we found that only in two different limbs, unilaterally, there was a presence of (a) an Additional Head of the Flexor Pollicis Longus (AHFPL-Gantzer’s muscle) and in a another limb (b) an Accessory Palmaris Longus was found and both belonged to the male sex.

Conclusion: Only 2% of the limbs in our study exhibited an abnormal pattern of the muscles. This study will supplement our knowledge on the possible variations of the muscles in this region, which would be useful for hand surgeons, orthopaedic surgeons, general surgeons, physicians and plastic surgeons, as it would probably compress the neuro- vascular bundle because of its close relationship, leading to both vascular and neural symptoms.

Keywords

Gantzer’s muscle (AHFPL), Carpel tunnel syndrome, Accessory Palmaris Longus, Guyon’s canal

Introduction
A wide array of supernumerary and accessory musculature has been described in the anatomical, surgical and radiological literatures. In most of the cases, the accessory muscles are asymptomatic and they are found incidentally during surgery or imaging. However, in some cases, the accessory muscles may produce clinical symptoms due to the compression of the neuro vascular structures, especially in the fibro osseus tunnels. In some cases, if an obvious cause of the neurological symptoms is not evident, the recognition and the careful evaluation of the accessory muscles may aid in the diagnosis and treatment of these cases. Variations in the extensor compartment of the forearm are quite common. However, in the flexor compartment, not many variations Original Article are noted and the occurrence of an additional muscle is very uncommon. In case of the Carpel Tunnel Syndrome, it is said to be because of the inflammation with subsequent oedema, which leads to compression in the carpel tunnel, but in certain cases, these accessory muscles can also produce the Carpel Tunnel Syndrome due to overcrowding in the fibro osseus tunnels. Hence, this study was taken to rule out the prevalence of the muscles which are encountered in our population.

Aim
The aim of this study was to ascertain the prevalence of the accessory muscles in the flexor compartment of forearm to help the physicians, the general surgeons and the hand surgeons, tokeep this in mind for the diagnosis as well as for the treatment of such conditions, which involves compression of the neuro vascular structures.

Material and Methods

The present study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Chennai Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Trichy and in the Department of Anatomy, Sri Ramachandra University, Chennai, India. This study was done from 2006-2012, for a total of seven years, and it consisted of 100 cadavers which were used for the routine undergraduate teaching program. All the cadavers belonged to the adult category and they were without any obvious pathological deformities. The cadavers were preserved by the injection of formalin based preservative (10% formalin) and they were stored in tanks. Before taking photographs, the dissected region was rinsed with water. From all the cadavers, the upper limbs on both the sides were disarticulated after the dissection, with the subsequent tagging of sex and the identification number for that particular cadaver from which the limb was disarticulated. Both the sexes were included in our study. There were 90 male cadavers and 10 female cadavers. The disarticulated limbs were in a total of 200 (100-right side and 100-left side). Meticulous care was taken to exclude the limbs which exhibited obscuring pathologies, fractures (both pre- and post-mortem), deformities, congenital anomalies and previous surgery in this region and amputations.

METHODS The dissections were carried out in all the limbs on the right and left sides as per the instructions which were given by Cunningham’s Manual of Practical Anatomy. The skin was reflected to expose the superficial fascia, and it was examined for its contents: cutaneous nerves and vessels and if any abnormality was noted, it was recorded in detail. Then the superficial fascia was incised and it was reflected to expose the deep fascia. Then the deep fascia was incised and it was reflected to expose the muscles of the superficial compartment of the fore arm. All the muscles were examined for their presence, position, and their attachments, and then the superficial compartment was cut to expose the deep compartment muscles; again, the routine investigation was carried out.

If any abnormality was found in the muscular pattern, it was recorded in detail and photographed.

OBSERVATION In our study, we came across two variations of accessory muscles in two different limbs unilaterally, which belonged to the male sex. (a) AHFPL-Additional Head of the Flexor Pollicis Longus (GANTZER’S muscle) on the left side forearm, (unilateral) of a male cadaver. (b) An Accessory Palmaris longus on the right side forearm (unilateral) of a male cadaver. The GANTZER’S muscle ( AHFPL) originated from the undersurface of the Flexor Digitorum Superficialis muscle, just distal to its origin from the medial epicondyle. On further dissection, the accessory belly was found to run downwards to the medial aspect of the Flexor Poliicis Longus tendon proper for its insertion at the junction between the proximal and the middle thirds of the forearm. The accessory Palmaris Longus originated from different areas, namely few fibers from the deep fascia of the forearm, passing through the GUYON’S canal over the ulnar vessels and the nerves and merging with the hypothenar muscles, few fibres from the tendon of the Palmaris Longus proper and at last, few fibres from the flexor retinaculum. The tendon of the accessory Palmaris longus muscle got inserted into the medial epicondyle.

Discussion

In the forearm, the muscles can be classified into a superficial set of muscles and a deep set of muscles. The superficial set of the muscles are the Pronator teres (PT), the Flexor carpi radialis (FCR), the Palmaris longus (PL), the Flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) and the Flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU). The deep set of the muscles are the Flexor digitorum profundus(FDP), the Flexor pollicis longus(FPL) and the Pronator quadrates(PQ). The Flexor pollicis longus is one of the deep flexors of the forearm and it originates from the grooved anterior surface of the radius and from the adjacent interosseous membrane and gets inserted into the base of the distal phalanx of thumb (1). It has been noted that it can arise from the lateral border of the coronoid process or from the medial epicondyle of the humerus. This variable slip of the muscle is called as the GANTZER’S muscle (2).

The prevalence of the Gantzer’s muscle has been noted to be around 50-60% by Al-Quattan (3),and Oh (4). There has been various reports from different studies regarding the prevalence of this Gantzer’s muscle, which was found to range from 75% (2), to 5.3% (5), to 54.2% (6), to 55% (7), to 66.66% (8), to 62% (9). It has also been reported to occur unilaterally or bilaterally and the chances for it to occur bilaterally than unilaterally is more [3,4,8,10,11,12,13]. There has been reports of its variable origin too [2,3,6,7,9]. Normally, the Flexor pollicis is supplied by the Anterior Interosseus nerve which descends on the interosseus membrane between the FPL and the FDP. Further, it runs downwards between the FPL and the PQ. This additional head (the Gantzer’s muscle) is said to be one of the structures which may compress the anterior interosseus nerve, thus leading to a relatively rare clinical condition which is called as the anterior interosseous nerve syndrome, which produces the square pinch deformity.

This condition is said to interfere with the functions of precision handling (finger-thumb prehension) and a powerful grip (full hand prehension) as the FPL acts as a stabilizer of the flexed phalanx of the thumb. As has been said by Levangie and Norkin (14), the architecture of this muscle is important to determine its function and so, abnormalities in its shape affects not only its function but also its range of movements. In contrast to the Flexor pollicis longus proper which is made up of unipennate muscle fibres, the additional head of the FPL (Gantzer’s) is made up of fusiform muscle fibres which have an opposite function to that of the unipennate muscle. So, it could lead to an extra strain on the normal function of the FPL proper, in turn, leading to the loss of precise and skillful movements of the thumb. According to a study which was done on 240 limbs, the prevalence of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus was observed in 149 specimens. In these 149 specimens, four basic patterns of the relationship of AHFPL with the anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) were found. (a) AIN was found to pass anterior to the AHFPL in13.4% specimens (b) AIN passed lateral to the AHFPL in 65.8% specimens (c)AIN passed posterior to the AHFPL in 8.1% specimens and (d) AIN passed both lateral and posterior to the AHFPL in 12.8% specimens (9).

The palsy of the AIN is frequently reported to be due to the entrapment by soft tissue, and vascular and bony structures and it may be associated with other causes like neuralgic amyotrophy, entrapment neuropathy (15), and repetitive trauma to the forearm. It may also be due to anatomical abnormalities.

We would like to conclude that the chances for AIN to get entrapped is more likely when the nerve passes posteriorly or laterally to the AHFPL, based on anatomical considerations. Developmentally, the occurrence of AHFPL is due to incomplete differentiation. Initially, a common flexor mass is formed in the embryo, which further differentiates into a superficial layer and a deep layer. The deep layer further develops into the FDP, FPL and the PQ muscles. In case an incomplete differentiation occurs, then such type of accessory muscles are formed [16,17]. Hemmandy has stated that the accessory muscles are to be borne in mind during decompression fasciotomy for the compartment syndrome of the forearm, and during anterior surgical approaches to the proximal radius and the elbow joint.

The next finding was the presence of an accessory Palmaris longus on the right side forearm in a male cadaver unilaterally. In hand reconstructive surgeries, the Palmaris longus muscle is one of the most utilized donor site for tendon reconstruction procedures. However, its anatomical position is variable and its anatomical variations may be responsible for the median nerve compression. In our study, the accessory Palmaris longus originated from different areas ie few fibres arose from the tendon of the Palmaris longus proper, few fibres arose from the deep fascia of the forearm, passing through the GUYON’S canal over the ulnar vessels and merging with the hypothenar muscles and at last, a few fibres arose from the flexor retinaculum whereas its insertion was into the medial epicondyle. The muscle had a long tendon and a short muscular belly.

The accessory muscles are the most frequently described anatomical variations at the Guyon’s canal, whose occurrence is about 22.4% in cadaver specimens and which occur bilaterally in 46.2% specimens (18). The most common anatomical accessory muscle variations were the accessory abductor digiti minimi with a prevalence of 61.5% (Dodd’s et al.,1990) (18) and the accessory Palmaris longus with a prevalence of 8.6%. The Guyon’s canal syndrome can be classified as occurring due to a primary cause and a secondary cause. The primary is idiopathic with symptoms of Guyon’s canal syndrome, with no identifiable lesion (19). The secondary causes can be subdivided into (a) Traumatic,(b) Inflamatory, (c) Structural and (d) Vascular. The structural causes may be of a tumorous or a non tumorous nature. The tumours may be due to ganglions, lipomas and gaint cell tumours.

The non-tumorous causes may be due to anomalous muscles like the unusual thickening of the Palmaris brevis, andthe accessory Palmaris longus, or the complete reversal of the Palmaris longus. The presence of an accessory Palmaris longus can be attributed to an unusual migration of myoblasts during the morphogenesis. Although it is rare, an accessory Palmaris longus is worth bearing in mind as a possible cause for median nerve compression.

Conclusion

We would like to conclude by stating that the observations which were made by us in this study will supplement our knowledge on the possible variation of the muscles in this region, which would be useful for orthopedic surgeons, plastic surgeons, hand surgeons and general surgeons, as it would compress the neuro-vascular structures because of its close relationship, thus causing both vascular and neuronal symptoms. The presence of the Gantzer’s muscle (AHFPL) may compress the AIN, thus leading to the AIN syndrome (Kiloh-Nevin syndrome) and thus causing a square pinch deformity and difficulty in precision handling. The accessory Palmaris longus which arises from the deep fascia and crosses the Guyon’s canal could be the cause for the development of the Guyon’s canal syndrome. Even though the literature review has quoted that the frequency of the accessory muscles which are encountered are more, in our study, we came across only two cases which constituted only 2% of the population. The authors frankly accept that the sample size was too small and that the female cadavers (limbs) constituted only 10% of the total number of the specimens. So, to come to a definitive conclusion, these type of studies should be conducted in different regions of India and also on good numbers of specimens.

References

1.
Williams PL, Bannister LH, Berry MM, Collins P, Dyson M, Dussek JE, et al. Gray’s Anatomy. 38th Ed., New York, Churchill Livingston. 1995; 848.
2.
Wood J. Variations in Human Mycology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 1868; 16: 483-525.
3.
Al-Quattan MM. Gantzer’s muscle. An anatomical study of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis muscle. J Hand Surg Br. 1998;275:269-270.
4.
Oh CS, Chung IH, Koh KS. Anatomical study of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus and the anterior interosseus nerve in Asians. Clin Anat. 2000; 13:434-38.
5.
Dykes J, Anson BJ. The accessory tendon of the flexor pollicis longus muscle. Anat Rec. 1944;90: 83-89.
6.
Malhotra VK, Sing NP, Tewari SP. The accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle and its nerve supply. Anat Adz . 1982; 151: 503-05.
7.
Jones M, Abrahams PH, Sanudo JR, Campills M. Incidence and morphology of the accessory heads of the flexor pollicis longus and the flexor digitorum profundus (Gantzer’s muscle). J Anat. 1997;191: 451-55.
8.
Hemmady MV, Subramanya AV, Mehta IM. The occasional head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle: a study on its morphology and its clinical significance. JPostgrad Med. 1993; 39: 14-16.
9.
Mahakkanukrant P, Surin P, Ongkana N, Sethadavit M, Vaidhayakarn P. Prevalence of the accessory head of the flexor pollicis longus muscle and its relationship to the anterior interosseus nerve in the Thai population. Clin Anat.2004; 17: 631-35.
10.
Mangini U. The flexor pollicis longus muscle. Its morphology and clinical significance. J Bone Joint Surg AM. 1960; 42: 470-87.
11.
Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. Musculoaponeurotic variations along the course of the median nerve in the proximal forearm. J Hand Surg Br.1987; 12: 359-63.
12.
Shirali S, Hanson M, Branovacki G, Gonzalez M. The flexor pollicis longus and its relationship to the anterior and posterior interosseus nerves. J Hand Surg Br. 1998; 23: 170-72.
13.
Romanes GJ. Upper and Lower limbs. In: Cunningham’s Manual of Practical Anatomy. 15th ed. Vol 1. New York: Oxford University Press. 1993; 67-8, 74-76.
14.
Levangie PK, Norkin CC. Joint Structure and Function: A Comprehensive Analysis. 4th Ed., Philadelphia, F.A.Davis Company.2008; 120-21.
15.
Nagano A. Spontaneous anterior interosseous nerve palsy. J Bone Joint Surgery Br. 2003; 85: 313-18.
16.
Hollinshead W.H. Anatomy for Surgeons. New York, Harper and Row, 1964; 3: 412.
17.
Jones M, Abrahams PH. Incidence and morphology of the accessory heads of the flexor pollicis longus and the flexor digitorum profundus ( Gantzer’s muscle). j. Anat., 1997; 191: 451-55.
18.
Dodds GA, Hale D, Jackson WT. Incidence of anatomic variants in Guyon’s canal.
19.
Bozkurt MC, Tagil SM, Oscakar L, Ersoy M, Tekdemir I. Anatomical variations as potential risk factors for the ulnar tunnel syndrome: a cadaveric study. Clin Anat 2005; 18:274-80

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com