Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 103090

AbstractReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2011 | Month : June | Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | Page : 659 - 661

Preanalytical Errors: Some common errors in Blood Specimen Collection for routine investigations in hospital patients

PRABHAT KUMAR NIGAM

Dept of Cardiology, CSM Medical University, UP, Lucknow- 226003.

Correspondence Address :
P.K. Nigam, Dept of Cardiology, CSM Medical University, UP,
Lucknow 226003
Email: p_nigam1@yahoo.com
Phone: 0522 2692084 (Residence), 0522 2255830 ext 47 (Office)
9235775577 (mobile

Abstract

Preanalytical variables include specimen collection, handling, processing, physiological influences and/or interference factors. Since the blood collection is the first step, any error in this step will jeopardize the whole test results, no matter how accurately these are analysed in the laboratory. Here, some common errors in blood collection and handling in hospital patients have been highlighed by giving some instances . Preanalytics involve the patient, the physician, the resident doctor, the Prabhat Kumar Nigam nurse, the technician, the laboratory personnel and the transport service. Therefore, all of them are required to know about preanalytical variables, their possible sources and their effect on the test results. Moreover, since the resident doctors have a direct interaction with the paramedical staff, it is very important for them to understand the preanalytical variables so that they could instruct the paramedical staff accordingly.

Keywords

Preanalytical Errors, Blood Collection

There is an increasing trend in the awareness with respect to improving the laboratory results during the past several years. But in India, there is still a need for more awareness in this direction. The three main phases in laboratory testing are: preanalytical, analytical and postanalytical. Of these, the preanalytical phase is the major source of error, accounting for 81% of all the errors in lab tests (1)(2)(3)(4). The preanalytical variables include specimen collection handling processing, physiological influences and/or interference factors. Since the blood collection is the first step, any error in this step will jeopardize the whole test results, no matter how accurately these are analysed in the laboratory. Here, I discuss the errors in blood collection and handling in hospital patients by giving some instances that I have come across during the last 25 years of my experience in a medical institution.

Case # 1: A patient’s haemoglobin was found to be 6.0 g/dl but when the blood smear of the same patient was examined, it showed normochromic, normocytic RBCs. The patient was not clinically anaemic. When another blood sample of the same patient was tested, the haemoglobin was found to be 12 g/dl. Upon enquiry, it was found that the previous blood was collected from the vein in which normal saline was being infused, thus resulting in the dilution of the blood. If this patient was infused glucose, then such a blood sample would also have given a high plasma glucose level. Therefore, blood should never be taken from the arm in which any fluid is being infused.

Case # 2 : Haemolysis is a very common error in the preanalytical phase and haemolysis can affect various tests due to the release of erythrocytic contents. Also, the reddish colour of the serum / plasma may interfere with various assays. Once, our laboratory received three blood specimens of a patient viz. with fluoride, oxalate and in a plain syringe without any anticoagulant. Out of these three, the blood in the fluoride and oxalate vials was haemolysed, while that in the syringe was nonhaemolysed. This was quite surprising because the blood was collected in one syringe and was then poured into the fluoride and the oxalate vials and the remaining was left as such in the syringe. Now, there could be three reasons for the haemolysis: 1. The vials were shaken too vigorously after pouring the blood intoit (which is a very common practice), thus causing the breakdown of the RBCs, 2. The blood was poured into the vials through the needle and with great pressure and froth formation, 3. The presence of moisture or other contaminants in the vials. The third reason seemed to be least possible, as the vials were prepared in our laboratory with great care. Upon enquiry, it was found that the blood was poured through the needle into the vials.

There are certain other reasons for haemolysis in addition to those which are mentioned above: 1. Drawing the plunger of the syringe back forcefully while collecting blood (5). 2. Sometimes, when the vein is missed after venipunture and the same syringe and needle are used for another venipuncture in the same patient, even if there is no visible blood in the syringe from the previous venipunture. 3. Prolonged tourniquet time (6). 4. Blood drawn from the IV catheter (7). and 5. Prolonged contact of the serum or plasma with the cells (8). Recently, it has been shown that evacuated closed blood collection (vacutainer) resulted in a several fold reduction in the incidence of haemolysis as compared to the open collection by using a needle and syringe, by using either disposable tubes or rewashed glass vials (9).

Case # 3 : One patient’s serum potassium level was found to be 18 mmol/L and his sodium level was 210 mmol/L. On suspecting some contamination, another blood sample of the same patient was collected which showed the potassium and sodium levels to be within normal limits. When the nurse who had collected the first sample was asked as to how exactly she had collected the blood, she said that she had poured the blood into the fluoride vial (containing sodium fluoride and potassium oxalate) by mistake but that upon realizing her mistake she had withdrawn the blood immediately into the syringe and had sent it to the laboratory. She did not realize that the anticoagulants would have had dissolved so quickly. This resulted in high sodium and potassium values. The other possible causes of pseudohyperkalaemia are: 1. Repeated fist clenching during the tourniquet application [10-12]. 2. The lysis of leucocytes and thrombocytes in the specimens with leucocytosis and thrombocytosis (13). This is why sometimes the potassium values are higher in the serum than in the plasma due to the lysis of the cellular elements during the process of clotting. 3. Storing the clotted blood in a refrigerator leads to the inhibition of the Na-K ATPase pump, thus leading to the efflux of potassium from the cells into the serum and the influx of sodium into the cells from the serum, thus resulting in hyperkalaemia and hyponatraemia respectively (13). 4. Potassium may falsely be elevated in the serum/plasma if the blood is collected into nonadditive/heparinised vacutainers after collecting the blood in EDTA-K3 or K-oxalate-fluoride vacutainers (14), (15).

Case # 4: For the collection of heparinized blood, it is very important to use the correct salt of heparin and its quantity (16). Example: A healthy subject’s serum electrolyte level assessment was advised and since the report was needed urgently, I asked the resident doctor to collect heparinized blood. When I tested his plasma sodium and potassium levels, I found both to be below the normal limits. This was not expected as he was quite healthy and had come for a routine cardiac check up. Moreover, he was not taking any medication which might affecte the electrolyte levels. The test was repeated by using the same sample, but I got the same results. Unfortunately, another blood sample could not be collected. Then I asked the resident doctor as to how he actually collected the blood. He told me than he had taken about 0.5 ml of heparin in the syringe, but could collect even less than 1ml of blood. So, the dilution of the blood with heparin had resulted in the low values of electrolytes.

The correct amount of heparin is 20-50 U/ml of blood (17), but 12- 30 U/ml is also satisfactory (18). However, if the amount of heparin is more than the required amount, then the ionized calcium levels may be underestimated due to the binding effects of heparin on ionized calcium (17).

The sample to additive ratio: This is also very important e.g. for Prothrombin Time (PT) and for activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT). For these tests, blood is collected in citrated vial/tube in the ratio of 1:9 (1 part of citrate and 9 parts of blood). If less blood is collected (e.g.1:7), then there is a significant increase in the aPTT results as compared to those which are obtained with the 1:9 ratio (19). However, this effect of less blood to citrate is lesser on PT. The effect of the anticoagulant/blood ratio on PT becomes meaningful only when the ratio reaches 1:4.5 i.e. just less than half of its nominal volume (20). For polycythaemia patients, PT and aPTT can be prolonged when the nominal 1:9 ratio is used (21). This can be rectified by adjusting the citrate concentration in accordance with the hematocrit value by using an empirical formula or by using a 1:19 ratio (20),(21).

Preanalytics involve the patient, the physician, the resident doctor, the nurse, the technician, the laboratory personnel and the transport service. Therefore, all of them are required to know about the preanalytical variables, their possible sources and their effects on the test results. Moreover, since the resident doctors have a direct interaction with the paramedical staff, it is very important for them to understand the preanalytical variables so that they could instruct the paramedical staff accordingly. For more details about the preanalytical variables one can go through the review article by Narayanan (12).

SOME DO’S AND DON’TS:
1. The vein to be punctured should be localized and the area should be cleaned with 70% alcohol or chlorhexidine. It should be allowed to air dry before venipuncture. 2. The torniquet should not be applied for more than 1-2 minutes and the patient’s fist should not be clenched repeatedly to visualize the vein.3. Do not collect the blood from the vein or even from the arm which is receiving an infusion. 4. Avoid collecting blood from an IV catheter. 5. If the needle slips after venipucture, then it should be taken out and it should not be manipulated. A fresh prick should be made by using a fresh needle and syringe, even if there is no visible blood in the previous syringe. 6. Blood should not be poured into the vial/tube through the needle and with great pressure. 7. The amount of blood to be taken into an additive tube/vial should be exactly as is actually required for that tube/vial. 8. Do not shake the vial/tube vigorously after pouring the blood into it. 9. When collecting blood into vacutainers, follow the following sequence: plain tube (no additive) – citrated tube – heparin tube – EDTA tube – fluoride tube. 10. Do not keep the blood sample in a freezer or a refrigerator. Keep it at room temperature and send it to the laboratory as soon as possible.

References

1.
Ross JW,Boone DJ. Assessing the effect of mistakes in the total testing process on the quality of patient care.[Abstract 102] In: Martin L, Wagner W, Essien JDK, Institute of critical issues in health laboratory practice. Minneapolis, MN: Dupont Press 1991;667
2.
Plebani M, Carraro P. Mistakes and stat laboratory :types and frequency. Clin Chem 1997;43:1346-1351.
3.
Szeesi PB,Odum L. Error tracking in a clinical biochemistry laboratory. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:1253-1257.
4.
Goswami B, Singh B, Chawla R, Mallika V. Evaluation of errors in a clinical laboratory:a one year experience. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:63-66.
5.
Lawrence AK, Amadeo JP, Steven CK. Clinical Chemistr: Theory, analysis, correlation: Fouth Edition 2003;556-778
6.
Burns ER,Yoshikawa N.Hemolysis in serum samples drawn by emergency department personnel versus laboratory phlebotomists. Lab Med 2002;33:378-380.
7.
Lowe G, Stike R, Pollack M, Bosley J,O’Brien P, Hake A et al. Nursing blood specimen collection techniques and hemolysis rate in an emergengcy department:analysis of venipunture versus intravenous catheter collection technique. J Emerg Nurs 2008;196:196-197.
8.
Boyanton BL. Jr, Blick KE, Stability studies of twenty four analytes in human plasma and serum. Clin Chem 2002;48:2242-2247.
9.
Ashavaid TF,Dandeker SP,Keny B,Bhanibhawani VR.Influence of blood specimen collection method on various preanalytical sample quality indicators.Ind J Clin Biochem 2008;23:144-149.
10.
Skinner SL,Adeclaid MB,A cause of erroneous potassium levels. Lancet 1961;1:478-480.
11.
Don BR, Sebastian A, Cheitlin M, Christiansen M, Schambelan M. Pseudohyperkalemia caused by fist clenching during phlebotomy. N Engl J Med 1990;322:1290-1292.
12.
Narayanan S. The preanalytic phase-An important component of laboratory medicine. Am J Clin Path 2000;113:429-452.
13.
Narayanan S, Guder WG. Preanalytical variables and their influence on the quality of laboratory results. JIFCC 2000;!3(1).
14.
Sun N, Knauf R. Cross contamination solved by technique. ASCP Summary Rep 1977;14:3.
15.
Calam RR, Cooper MH. Recommended “Order of Draw” for collecting blood specimens into additive containing tubes. Clin Chem 1982;26:1399.
16.
Narayanan S. Effect of anticoagulants used for blood collection on laboratory tests. Jpn J Clin Path 1996;103:73-80.
17.
Moran RF, Fevillu A. Critical care analytes:preanalytical factors affecting result quality for combined blood gas and electrolyte system. J Automat Chem 1989;11:201-205.
18.
Guder W, Ehret W, Fonseca-Wollhei FD et al. Serum, plasma or whole blood?Which anticoagulants to use. J Lab Med 1998;22:297-312.
19.
Narayanan S, Hamasaki N. Current concepts of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Adv Clin Chem 1999;33:133-168.
20.
Narayanan S. Preanalytical aspects of coagulation testing. Haematologica 1995;80(2 suppl):1-5.
21.
Koepke JA, Rodger JL, Ollivier MJ. Pre-instrumental variables in coagulation testing. Am J Clin Path 1975;64:591-596.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1364

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com