Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 27525

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferencesDOI and Others
Readers' Comments (0) Article in PDF Audio Visual Citation Manager Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Archana Dambal

"Journal of clinical and diagnostic research is a welcome change in publishing practices. It aims to reach out to the grass-root level researchers who do not lack in experience, clinical material and ideas, but lack in their knowledge in English language and statistics. The journal achieves it's aim by supporting in these exact domains.
It also gives due credit to all research designs like descriptive and qualitative studies while many journals ignore these important study designs. The rigorous review process does not allow any compromise in quality
It is indexed in many indexing agencies and the articles are available under creative commons licence free of cost
The frequency of publication supports many aspiring authors from India and other countries.
It's wide scope welcomes articles across various specialities in medicine. In an era when there is an unscientific insistence on speciality specific research by regulatory bodies in medical education, JCDR supports collaborative research across specialities. I wish the publisher all the best in his future endeavors."



Dr. Archana Dambal
Department of General Medicine,
Belgaum Institute of Medical Sciences,Belgaum, Karnataka,INDIA,
On 30 Nov 2018




Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : June | Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | Page : 538 - 541

Sexual dimorphism in the Humerus : south Indians

GIRISH PATIL ,SANJEEV KOLAGI, UMESH RAMADURG

Department of Anatomy, S. N. Medical College Bagalkot, Karnataka Department of community medicine , S. N. Medical College Bagalkot, Karnataka

Correspondence Address :
Sanjeev Kolagi
Associate professor,
Department of Anatomy, S N Medical College, Navanagar,
Bagalkot-587101,Karnataka State
Email- drsanjeevkolagi@rediffmail.com
Phone- 09731798355

Abstract

The present study aimed to detect the possibility of sex discrimination from the humeral measurements in south Indians. One hundred normal right humeri were taken from one hundred cadavers (54 males and 46 females) who were above 20 years of age and who belonged to the south Indian population. Six measurements of the maximum length, vertical head diameter, midshaft circumference, minimum midshaft diameter, maximum midshaft diameter and epicondylar breadth were taken from each humerus. The measurements were statistically analyzed.

Keywords

Sexual dimorphisum, Humerus, Osteometry

How to cite this article :

GIRISH PATIL ,SANJEEV KOLAGI, UMESH RAMADURG. SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN THE HUMERUS : SOUTH INDIANS. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2011 June [cited: 2019 Aug 19 ]; 5:538-541. Available from
http://www.jcdr.net/back_issues.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2011&month=June&volume=5&issue=3&page=538-541&id=1296

The facility for personal identification, at present, is making rapid progress because of the development of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and stereolithography (1) (2).

The determination of sex is a very important component of any human skeletal analysis. Sex estimation in a complete human skeleton is usually easy by the observation of morphological traits (3).

Sex discriminatory functions which are obtained for each bone are very useful in mass disasters and criminal cases of multiple human burials, where charred bodies and scattered, mixed or incomplete remains are recovered. Since the osteometric methods for the determination of sex from the skeleton are population specific, researchers from around the world have conducted studies to establish group- specific standards of assessment (4).

Many bones have been previously used for the identification of sex, and such studies emphasize that sexual dimorphism starts to appear after puberty.(5) The humerus has rarely been tapped as a site for sex determination, though it has often demonstrated an even greater accuracy than other long bones such as the femur. (6)(7) Therefore, the purpose of this research was to establish osteometric standards for the determination of sex from the humerus in south Indians.

Material and Methods

The present work was carried out on 100 right humeri (54 males and 46 females) which belonged to the south Indian population. They were collected from the anatomy departments over 3 years. The bone samples were dissected and extracted from adult cadavers.
Samples with any pathological changes, fractures or the nonunion of the epiphysis of the head were excluded.

The collected bones were socked in a saturated solution of sodium chloride for 4- 6 weeks, and were then boiled in water with a pinch of sodium carbonate for 20-25 minutes. All adherent soft tissues were removed and the bones were dried for 2 days (8).
Six dimensions were taken for each humerus (to the nearest millimeters) by using an osteometric board (Table/Fig 1), a sliding caliper (Table/Fig 2) and a steel tape. The measurements included maximum length (V1), vertical head diameter (V2), midshaftcircumference (V3), minimum midshaft diameter (V4), maximum midshaft diameter (V5) and epicondylar breadth (V6) (Table/Fig 3) The Student’s t test was used to determine the mean standard deviation (SD), standard error (SE) and the variance for each variable in both the sexes. The T and P values were estimated, and the level of significance was set at 0.05. The data were also statistically analyzed by using the main from the SPSS program, version 6 (1988)(9).

The distance between the sex means (d/s) was also determined from the ratio of the mean difference and the mean standard deviation, to demonstrate the overlap between the male and the female samples.(10) The following formula was used: d/s= (Xm-Xf) √ (nM s2 M + nF s2 F) / (nM + nF) (Xm-Xf= means, nM, nF= examined samples; s2M, s2F variance in two samples). The mean difference (Xm-Xf) is the difference of the means of the males and females. Mean standard deviation is the square root of the ratio between the sample variance (males and females) and the total sample size. d/s was calculated to demonstrate the overlap between the male and the female samples.

The cut off level, the value which maximized the sum of the sensitivity and specificity, was determined for each variable by using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve (11). Various combinations to the measurements from V1 to V6, were also analyzed by using the ROC curves. Then, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the accuracy for each variable were detected separately and in combination.

The results of the descriptive statistical analyses are represented in (Table/Fig 1) revealing the mean, standard deviation, standard error and the variance of each variable. The t values for comparisonbetween the males and females and their significance are given. Also, the distance between the sex means (d/s) were recorded.

(Table/Fig 4) shows that the mean values of males were significantly higher than those of the females in all measurements (p<0.001). The standard deviations denoted that males exhibited more variability than females in all the variables.

The maximum length (V1) was the measurement with the greatest sex difference (d/s=2.07), followed by the midshaft circumference (V3) with d/s= 1.83, the minimum midshaft diameter (V4) with d/s= 1.77, epicondylar breadth (V6) with d/s= 1.74 and, the vertical head diameter (V2) with d/s= 0.47. The mean values of the six measurements in males and females are illustrated in (Table/Fig 5). The efficacy of the sex determination from each variable was tested by using the ROC curves to detect their cut off values. Measurements which were equal to or higher than the cut off levels indicated a male individual and lower values indicated afemale individual. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the accuracy for each variable are shown in (Table/Fig 6).

Results

The results revealed that the measurements of males weresignificantly higher than those of the females (P<0.001). The maximum length was the most discriminating variable in sex determination, with a 90% rate of accuracy, followed by midshaft circumference (86%) and the minimum midshaft diameter (82%). A combination of the two variables revealed that the minimum midshaft diameter with the epicondylar breadth gave the highest rate of accuracy for correct sex prediction, with accuracy rate of 88%. The results of this study can help in the prediction of sex from the humerus in south Indians, when other human remains which are suitable for sex determination, are not available.

The maximum length (V1) was the measurement with the greatest sex difference (d/s=2.07), followed by the midshaft circumference (V3) with d/s= 1.83, the minimum midshaft diameter (V4) with d/s= 1.77, epicondylar breadth (V6) with d/s= 1.74 and, the vertical head diameter (V2) with d/s= 0.47. The mean values of the six measurements in males and females are illustrated in (Table/Fig 7). The efficacy of the sex determination from each variable was tested by using the ROC curves to detect their cut off values. Measurements which were equal to or higher than the cut off levels indicated a male individual and lower values indicated afemale individual. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) and the accuracy for each variable are shown in (Table/Fig 6).

(Table/Fig 6) shows that the accuracy of the sex measurements ranged from 58% to 90%. The maximum length (V1) was the first for sexual dimorphism, with the highest accuracy rate for sex prediction (90%). Midshaft circumference (V3) came next with an accuracy of 86%, followed by minimum midshaft diameter (V4) with an accuracy of 82%, maximum midshaft diameter (V5) with an accuracy of 80%, epicondylar breadth (V6) with 74% accuracy and finally, vertical head diameter (V2) with 58% accuracy. Also, from Table (2), it is clear that maximum length was the most sensitive variable for the identification of the male individuals (88.9%) and that it also had the highest rate of negative predictive values (87.5%) . It was followed by epicondylar breadth (sensitivity = 88.9% and NPV = 85.7%). Also, maximum length was found to be the most specific variable for the determination of the female sex (91.3%) and it also had the highest rate of positive predictive value (92.3%).

A variety of combinations between each of the two different variables were tested in order to make them more useful and these are shown in (Table/Fig 7).

It was obvious that the combination between V1 and V2, V2 and V6, V3 and V6 and V5 and V6 gave 100% sensitivity to themale sex and 100% negative prediction for females. Meanwhile, the combination between V4 and V6, V1 and V3 and V1 and V4 gave the highest rate of accuracy (88%). This is followed by the combination between V1 and V5 and V1 and V6 (86% each). The combination between V2 and V4 gave the lowermost rate of accuracy (74%).

Discussion

Sex determination is the first essential step for positive identification when a decomposed body is recovered. It is essential to identify sex from different bones of the body, other than the skull or the pelvis. Many studies have set osteometric standards for sexual dimorphism.(4) In addition, populations have different morphological and metric manifestations in both the sexes (12). Therefore, it is necessary to have population specific standards from skeletal collections (13).This study aimed to determine sex by using different measurements of the humerus which belonged to south Indians. All the cases in this study were above 20 years of age, as this was the age of the epiphyseal union of the head of the humerus and its shaft, with no further growth in the bone length (5).

The results have revealed that the mean values of the male measurements were significantly higher than those of the females. For example, the mean value of the maximum length (V1) was 32.10±1.58 and 28.95±1.45 in males and females respectively. The sexual difference of the humeral measurements was previously discussed by Iscan et al.(14), who studied the sexual dimorphism of the humerus among the Chinese, Japanese and the Thai populations. They found that the mean values of V1 were 31.37±1.646 and 28.36±1.368 in the Chinese, 29.74±1.042 and 27.69±1.71 in the Japanese and 30.06±1,565 and 27.89±1.367 in the Thai populations. The sex difference in the humeral measurements was explained by Black(15), who proposed that differential bone remodeling exists between the males and females, in addition to the development of more cortical bone during adolescence in the males.

The present study revealed that the maximum length (V1) was the measurement with the greatest sex difference (d/s= 2.07). The reliability of sex determination from each variable was tested by the analysis of the ROC curves and the maximum length (V1) was found to be the most sensitive one (88.9%) with the highest rate of accuracy (90%). This was followed by midshaft circumference- V3 (86% accuracy) and minimum midshaft diameter- V4 (82% accuracy). On the contrary, Iscan et al. (1998)(14) found that the most effective single dimension, as determined by the direct discriminate analysis, was the vertical head diameter (V2) in the Chinese (81%) and epicondylar breadth (V6) in the Japanese and the Thai populations (90% and 93% respectively). Also, Wu (1989) (6) reported the greatest dimorphism in the proximal and distal bone dimension during his study on the northeastern Chinese population. He found that the humeral head diameter was the most common sex discriminator (84%).

Gray and Wolfe (1980)(16) stated that stature based sexual dimorphism peaks in societies that are at the extremes of protein consumption, both high and low. In addition, DiBennardo and Taylor(17) suggested that shape measurements are of major significance for the correct diagnosis of sex, because the functional demands of weight bearing and musculature affect the circumferential measurements more than the length. Kranioti EF, and Michalodimitrakis M(18) studied 168 left humeriby the osteometric method and they found 92.3% accuracy in determining the sex. They found that the single most effective (89.9%) dimension was the vertical head diameter of the humerus. Robinson MS and Bidmos MA(19) got a 72-95.5% accuracy in their study on the skulls and humeri of South Africans (Europian Deescent).

A combination of the more sex differentiating measurements provided a higher rate of accuracy. A combination of the minimum midshaft diameter and epicondylar breadth (V4 and V6) gave the highest rate of accuracy (88%) and this seemed to be the most reliable one. This was followed by a combination of the maximum length and midshaft circumference (V1 and V3) and a combination of the maximum length and the minimum midshaft diameter (V1 and V4), with an accuracy rate of 88% for each. On the contrary, Iscan et al,(14) selected four variables for the Chinese and Japanese and three variables for the Thais. The only dimensions which were common to all the groups were epicondylar breadth and vertical head diameter, while maximum length was present as a factor only in the Chinese. They found that the highest rate of accuracy was 86, 8% in the Chinese, 92.4% in the Japanese and 97.1% in the Thais.

The degree and the distribution of sexual dimorphism vary both within and between the different regions. Therefore, most skeletal biologists agree that the interpopulation difference necessitates the development of regionally specific standards for the identification of sex. This study underscores the need for medicolegal investigations and also for the study of population affinities and factors which affect bone configurations.

It must be noted that the patterns of sexual dimorphism differ between populations and that the results which were obtained, could not have similar accuracy if they were applied to different ethnic groups. This study confirms the reliability of sex identification from the humerus and the reported results can be considered as a valid support for the medicolegal investigations which involve the skeletal remains of south Indians.

References

1.
Seo Y, Uchiyama T, Shimizu K, Takahama K. Identification of remains by sequencing of mitochondrial DNA control region. The Am. J. for. Med. Pathol. 2000; 20(3):138-143.
2.
Dolz M.S, Cina S.J, Smith R. Stereo lithography: a potential new tool in forensic medicine. The American journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 2000; 21(2): 119-123.
3.
L uo Y.C.C. Sex determination from the pubis by discriminant function analysis. For. Sci. Inter. 1995; 74(1): 89-98.
4.
Krogman W.M, Iscan MY. The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, IL. 1986, pp. 189-267.
5.
Knight B. Forensic Pathology. Edward Arnold, Division of Hodder & Stoughton, London, 1997, pp. 95-132.
6.
Wu L. Sex discriminant analysis of long bones of upper limb. Acta Anthropol. Sinica (Chinese with English abstract), 1989; 8:231-239.
7.
Abo Samak A.M, El-Hanafy M.M.A, Attia M.M, Mishriki E.S. Identification of sex from Patella in Egyptians. Mansoura J. Forensic Med. Clin. Toxicol. VII(2). July 1999; 43-55.
8.
Sinha A, Gupta V. A study on estimation of age from pubic symphysis. For.sci.inter.1995; 75(1):73-78.
9.
SPSS. SPSS, user’s guide. Spss Inc., Chicago. 1998 409..
10.
Introna F. Jr, Divella G, Campobasso C.P. Sex determination by discriminant analysis of patella measurements. Forensic science International, 1998; 95(1):39-45.
11.
Knapp R.G, Miller C.M. Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics. Harwal Publishing Co. Malvern, Pennsylvania, 1992; P.53-60.
12.
Iscan M.Y. Forensic Anthropology around the world. For.sci.inter. 1995; 74:1-3.
13.
Iscan M.Y, Shihai D. Sexual dimorphism in the Chinese femur. For.sci. inter.1995; 74(1-2): 79-87.
14.
Iscan M.Y, Loth S.R, King C.A, Shihai D, Yoshino M. Sexual dimorphism in the humerus: a comparative analysis of Chinese, Japanese and Thai. For.sci.inter. 1998; 98(1):17-29.
15.
Black T.K. A new method for assessing the sex of fragmentary skeletal remains: femoral shaft circumference. Am j. phys. Anthropol. 1978; 48(2):227-232.
16.
Gray J, Wolfe L. Height and sexual dimorphism of stature among human societies. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 1980; 53(3): 441-456.
17.
Dibennardo R, Tayler J.V. Classification and misclassification in sexing the black femur by discriminant functional analysis. Am. J. phys. Anthropol. 1982; 58(2): 145-151.
18.
Kranioti E F, Michalodimitrakis M. Sexual dimorphisum of the humerus in contemporary Cretans-a population specific study and a review of literature. Forensic Sci.2009;54(5):996-1000.
19.
Robinson M S, Bidmos M A. The skull and humerus in the determination of sex: reliability of discriminant function equations. Forensic Sci Int.2009;186(1-3):86e1-5.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1296

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com