Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 86562

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionKey MessageReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : June | Volume : 5 | Issue : 3 | Page : 443 - 447

A study of the clinical features and the outcome of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a tertiary care centre in South India

HALESHA BR, CHENNAVEERAPPA PK, VITTAK BG, JAYASHREE N

Corresponding Author. MD Pulmonary Medicine, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan, Karnataka, India. MD Biochemistry, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan, Karnataka, India. MD Pharmacology, Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences, Hassan, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Halesha BR, Assistant Professor,
Department of General Medicine,
Hassan Institute of Medical Sciences,
Hassan-573 201, Karnataka, India.
Mobile No: 09620150630.
Email: haleshbr81@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Background: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is an uncommon cause of stroke with extremely diverse clinical features, predisposing factors, brain imaging findings and outcomes. The prognosis of CVST is variable and its outcome may vary from recovery to permanent neurological deficits.

Aims: To study the clinical features, prognostic factors and the outcome in CVST.

Study Design: Prospective study.

Materials and Methods: Fifty patients with radiologically confirmed CVST were studied from November 2005 to October 2006. The demographical, clinical, radiological and outcome data were recorded and analyzed. The prognostic factors in patients who were enrolled in the study were prospectively investigated.A poor outcome after 12 weeks, which was defined as death or dependency (by the modified Rankin scale [mRS] ≥3), was used as the principal outcome measure.

Results: The most common presenting features were headache (90%), focal deficits (48%), seizures (44%), and coma (14%). Puerperium was the most common risk factor. After 12 weeks of follow up, nine patients (18%) had a poor outcome (mRS≥3or death). The multivariate predictors of a poor outcome were age >30 years, male sex, coma at presentation, cerebral haemorrhage and deep cerebral venous system thrombosis.

Conclusion: CVST can affect all age groups, particularly women of the child bearing age. The overall prognosis of CVST is fairly good with an independent survival of 82%.

Keywords

Clinical Features, Outcome, Prognostic Factors, Sinus Thrombosis

Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is a disease with potentially serious consequences, which usually affects young and middle aged people. CVST is rare as compared to arterial stroke. Its clinical evolution seems to be different from the other stroke subtypes and is highly variable between the studies (1).

Although it may present with a variety of signs and symptoms, headache is the most frequent and often the earliest manifestation (2). Despite the improvements in its diagnosis and treatment, dural sinus thrombosis may still cause death or permanent disability. The outcome of the patients with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis may vary from complete recovery to permanent neurological deficits as a natural course of the disease (3).

In the acute phase, it is important to identify those patients who have a poor prognosis because this may influence the therapeutic strategy and enable the treating physician to give reliable information to the patient and his/her relatives.

In contemporary studies, the reported mortality rate was found to range between 8% and 14% (4). This was in contrast to prior studies in which cause specific mortality was as high as 30% to 50% (5).

Reliable data on the natural history and the prognosis of CVST are scarce. This present study was planned to evaluate the clinical features, prognostic factors and the outcome in CVST.

Material and Methods

The present study included 50 cases of CVST which were admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine, Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences, Hubli, South India, after considering the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The study spanned over a period of 12 months form November 2005 to October 2006.

The reasons for exclusion were age younger than 12 years, indications or contraindications for heparin and conditions with a poor prognosis which was unrelated to CVST.

All the patients underwent computerised tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and were reviewed by trained radiologists. The diagnosis was based on established radiological criteria. Demographical, clinical, laboratory, and radiological data were recorded. The functional status was recorded on a modified Rankin scale(mRS) at admission, discharge, and at 12 weeks follow-up and the outcome was dichotomized as good (score of 0–2) or poor (score ≥3).

The outcome was recorded at discharge from the hospital and at 12 weeks follow-up. In addition, the in-hospital mortality was recorded separately.

Statistical analysis
χ2 tests (or Fisher’s exact test whenever appropriate) were performed to analyze the univariate relationship between the possible prognostic factors and the outcome at 12 weeks. As it was likely that the different prognostic factors were mutually related, the independent effects of the prognostic factors were additionally analyzed by using multivariate logistic regression. Subsequently, all the variables with p≤ 0.25 which were identified in the univariate analysis were presented to a logistic regression model to assess their independent prognostic values.

The significant prognostic factors were selected with a forward selection strategy by using the likelihood ratio statistic, with p ≤ 0.05 as the criterion level for selection. The effect sizes wereexpressed as the odds ratios (OR). The OR can be interpreted as an estimation of the relative risk of a poor outcome. The data was analyzed by the SPSS, version 14.0 (SPSS Inc).

Results

Fifty cases (40 females and 10 males) were included in the study. The mean age of the study population was 29.06 years, with a range from 14 to 54 years (median 30 years). Among the total study subjects, 42% of the patients were in the age group between 21-30 years.

The neurological symptoms and signs at admission are summarised
in the (Table/Fig 1). Headache was the most frequent symptom
which was present in 45(90%) patients. Seven patients (14%) were
presented in coma. Out of 50 cases, 28 cases (56%) had a sub
acute onset. An acute and chronic onset was noted in 17(34%)
and five (10%) cases respectively.

The risk factors for CVST are shown in (Table/Fig 2). Twenty five (50%) patients were in puerperium and three patients (6%) had used oral contraceptive pills. No possible cause for CVST could be identified in 10(20%) patients.

All the patients underwent brain imaging. The most common modality which was used was MRI of the brain (73%), followed by CT scan of the brain (48%). Cerebral haemorrhage was found in 18(36%) patients and cerebral infarct was found in 36(64%) patients by CT or MRI. The superior sagittal sinus was the mostcommon sinus which was involved in 41(82%) patients, as shown in (Table/Fig 1).

In the acute phase, most patients (74 %) were anti coagulated with intravenous heparin or subcutaneous low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in therapeutic dosages. Additional treatment included anti epileptic drugs, osmotherapy, steroids and acetazolamide and 6% of the patients required mechanical ventilation.

Information on the outcome at discharge and after 12 weeks of follow up was available for all the patients (Table/Fig 3).Ten patients were either dead (n=3) or disabled (mRS≥3; n=7) at the time of discharge. None of the patients with post partum CVST died.

The twelve week follow up was assessed by a face to face interview. None of the patients were lost to follow up. At the end of 12 weeks of follow up, four patients died (8%) and five (10%) patients remained dependent with mRS ≥3 (Table/Fig 4).

On a multivariate analysis, age >30 years (p<0.05), male sex (p<0.01), coma (GCS<9) at presentation (p<0.001), cerebral haemorrhagep<0.03) on imaging and deep cerebral venous system involvement (p<0.01) were associated with a poor outcome at 12 weeks of follow-up. Isolated intracranial hypertension was associated with a good outcome (p<0.05).

Discussion

The clinical presentation of CVST is extremely variable ranging from an isolated headache to focal deficits to encephalopathy to psychiatric manifestation to coma (6), (7). Headache was the most common symptom which was seen in 90% of the patients and seven patients (14%) were presented in coma. de Bruijn SFTM et al reported that headache was seen in 95% of patients and coma in 15% of the patients (8).

In our study, 62.5% (25 out of 40) female patients were in the post partum period as opposed to <15% which was reported from the west (4),(8),(9). A possible explanation for this difference may be home deliveries in unhygienic environments. In our study, only 6% of the women were using oral contraceptives. This was in contrast to studies from the west, where the use of oral contraceptives was implicated in 54 to 77% of the CVST cases (4), (8), (9).

Ear, nose and throat infections accounted for 6% of the CVST cases in our study, as compared to 8.2% in the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT) (4). Hyper homocystinaemia is an important cause of hypercoagulopathy which increases the risk of CVST by four fold (10). In our study, plasma homocysteine was elevated in two patients and no cause for CVST was identified in 10(20%) patients.

We noted some significant differences in the risk factor profile for this disease from that of the west, i.e. in the post partum state, which was more common in our population. Oral contraceptive use was not a major risk factor in our setting. Only 74% of our patients received anticoagulation. This was lower than that which was reported by ISCVT, which reported 85% of the patients as having received anticoagulation (4). This lower rate may reflect the physician’s lack of awareness and reluctance.

The death or dependency rate at discharge in our study was 20%, which was comparable to studies from ISCVT (18.9%) (4) and Terrazi et al (25%) (11). We noted a death rate of 6% at discharge, which was within the range which was reported in the literature i.e. 4.3% to 15% (4), (10) , (12). In the present study, the death or dependency rate after 12 weeks of follow up showed a good outcome (mRS<3) in 82% of the patients and a poor outcome (mRS ≥3 or death) in 18% of the patients. In a study which was done by ISCVT (4), 14% of the patients had a poor outcome after 6 months of follow up and de Bruijn et al reported an independent survival (mRS<3) in 83%of the patients and a poor outcome in 17% of the patients after 12 weeks followup (8).

In a study which was done by Benfait et al, the mortality rate at 12 weeks of follow-up was 17.7% (13) and de Bruijn et al reported a mortality rate of 10.2% (8). In the present study, the mortality rate after 12 weeks of follow up was 8%, which was comparable to that which was seen in other studies (Table/Fig 5).

We have noticed that the factors which were associated with a poor prognosis in the multivariate analysis were age > 30 years (p < 0.05, OR=8.46), male sex (p < 0.01, OR= 9), coma at presentation (p <0.001, OR=80), cerebral haemorrhage (p < 0.03, OR=24) and deep cerebral venous system thrombosis (p < 0.01, OR=32). Age, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) on admission, at least two seizures during the hospital treatment despite antiepileptic treatment, venous infarct and intra cerebral haemorrhage were the factors which were associated with a poor outcome in a study by Stolz et al (12). In a study on ISCVT, age older than 37 years, male sex, any malignancy, central nervous system infection, any seizures, mental status disorders, Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) <9 at admission, intra cerebral haemorrhage and deep venous system thrombosis were the factors which were associated with a poor outcome (4). Coma and intra cerebral haemorrhage were the factors which were associated with a poor prognosis in a study by de Bruijn et al (8).

The prognosis of CVST was better than that which was reported previously. A subgroup (12%) of clinically identifiable CVST patients was at an increased risk of bad outcome. These high risk patients may benefit from more aggressive therapeutic interventions.

Conclusion

CVST is an uncommon cause of stroke with extremely diverse clinical features, predisposing factors, brain imaging findings and outcome. The post partum state and infections are the most common predisposing factors. The overall prognosis of CVST is fairly good with an independent survival of 82% and a death/ dependency rate of 18%.

Age older than 30 years, male sex, coma at presentation, cerebral haemorrhage and deep cerebral venous system thrombosis on CTor MRI scan brain are the prognostic factors which are associated with a poor prognosis.

Suggestions and recommendati ons
Identifying patients who are at a high risk for unfavourable outcomes may provide an opportunity for the development of novel therapeutic paradigms including thrombolysis (systemic versus endovascular) and early neurosurgical interventions.

We suggest that this disease be suspected in every post partum woman with neurological symptoms and we recommend the evaluation for hyper homocystinaemia and a careful search for the central venous system, ear, nose, throat infections and face and sinus infections in the setting of CVST.

Key Message

CVST can affect all age groups, particularly women of child bearing age. The post partum state and infections were the most common predisposing factors. The overall prognosis of CVST is fairly good, with an independent survival of 82%.

References

1.
Bousser MG, Russel RR. Cerebral venous thrombosis. In: Warlow CP, Van Gijin J, editors. Major problems in Neurology. London, UK: WB Saunders; 1997:27-9.
2.
Bousser MG, Chiras J, Bories J, Castaigne P. Cerebral venous thrombosis: A review of 38 cases. Stroke 1985; 16:199-213.
3.
Einhaupl KM, Villringer A, Habert RL, Pfister W, Deckert M, Steinhoff H, et al. Clinical spectrum of sinus venous thrombosis. In: Einhaupl KM, Kempski O, Baethmann A, editiors. Cerebral sinus thrombosis; experimental and clinical aspects. New York: Plenum press; 1990; 149-56.
4.
Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J, Bousser MG, Barinagarrementeria F. Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke 2004; 35:664-70.
5.
Barnett HJ, Hyland HH. Noninfective intracranial venous thrombosis. Brain 1953; 76:36-49.
6.
Bousser MG, Ferro JM. Cerebral venous thrombosis: an update. Lancet Neurol. 2007; 6:162-70.
7.
Mehindiratta MM, Garg S, Gurnani M. Cerebral venous thrombosisclinical presentation. J Pak Med Assoc. 2006; 56:512-6.
8.
De Bruijn SFTM, De Haan RJ, Stam J. Clinical features and prognostic factors of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in a prospective series of 59 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001; 70:105-8.
9.
Deschiens MA, Conard J, Horellou MH, Ameri A, Preter M, Chedru F, Samama MM, Bousser MG. Coagulation studies, Factor V Leiden, and anticardiolipin antibodies in 40 cases of cerebral venous thrombosis. Stroke.1996; 27:1724-30.
10.
Martineli I, Battaglioli T,Pedotti P,Cattaneo M, Mannucci PM. Hyperhomocystinemia in cerebral vein thrombosis. Blood. 2003; 102:1363-6.
11.
Terrazi E, Mittino D, Ruda R, Cerrato P, Monaco F, Sciolla R, et al. Cerebral venous thrombosis: a retrospective multicentre study of 48 patients. Neurol Sci 2005; 25(6): 311-5.
12.
Stolz E, Rahimi A, Gerriets T, Kraus J, Kaps M. Cerebral venous thrombosis: an all or nothing disease? Prognostic factors and long term outcome. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2005; 107(2):99-107.
13.
Bienfait HP, Stam J, Lensing AW, Hilten JJ. Thrombosis of the cerebral veins and sinuses in 62 patients. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 1995; 139:1286-91.
14.
Einhäupl KM, Villringer A, Meister W, Mehraein S, Garner C, Pellkofer M, Haberl RL, Pfister HW, Schmiedek P. Heparin treatment in sinus venous thrombosis. Lancet. 1991; 338: 597–600.
15.
Ameri A, Bousser MG. Cerebral venous thrombosis. Neurol Clin. 1992; 10: 87–111.
16.
Barinagarrementeria F, Cantu C, Arredondo H. Aseptic cerebral venous thrombosis: proposed prognostic scale. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 1992; 2: 34–39.
17.
Ferro J, Correia M, Pontes C, Baptista M, Pita F (VENOPORT). Cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis in Portugal: 1980–1998. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2001; 11: 177–182
18.
Mehraein S, Schmidtke K, Villringer A, Valdueza JM, Masuhr F. Heparin treatment in the cerebral sinus and venous thrombosis: patients at a risk of fatal outcome. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003; 15: 17–21.
19.
Azin H, Ashjazadeh N. Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis-- Clinical Features, Predisposing and Prognostic Factors. Acta Neurol Taiwan 2008; 17:82-87.
20.
Khealani BA, Wasay M, Saadah M, Sultana E, Mustafa S, Khan FS, Kamal AK. Cerebral venous thrombosis: a descriptive multicenter study of patients in Pakistan and the Middle East. Stroke. 2008 Oct; 39(10):2707-11. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
21.
Kajtazi NI, Zimmerman VA, Arulneyam JC, Al-Shami SY, Al-Senani FM. Cerebral venous thrombosis in Saudi Arabia. Clinical variables,response to treatment, and outcome. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2009 Oct; 14(4):349-54.
22.
Fischer C, Goldstein J, Edlow J. Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis in the emergency department: retrospective analysis of 17 cases and review of the literature. J Emerg Med. 2010 Feb; 38(2):140-7. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1378

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com