Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 48884

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : November | Volume : 5 | Issue : 7 | Page : 1336 - 1338 Full Version

Intra-ocular Pressure in Subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus


Published: November 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1688
Anandha Lakshmi S, Petricia H, Saravanan A, Ramachandran C

Department of Physiology, SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, SRM University, Kattankulathur – 603 203. Tamilnadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. S Anandha lakshmi, MD,
Department of Physiology,
SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre,
SRM University, Kattankulathur, Tamilnadu, India.
E-mail: ssathyan2003@gmail.com

Abstract

Background and objective: Open-angle glaucoma is estimated to afflict 66.8 million people worldwide and it is a leading cause of blindness (1). Diabetes is one of the risk factors for glaucoma. The purpose of the study was to analyze the relationship between intraocular pressure and type 2 diabetes mellitus and to investigate the effects of chronic hyperglycaemia on the intraocular pressure (IOP).
Materials and Methods: We prospectively measured the IOP by Schiotz tonometry in 100 normal subjects (Group I) and in 150 subjects with type 2 diabetes (Group II). None of the subjects with diabetes had diabetic retinopathy, secondary glaucoma or a family history of glaucoma nor did they undergo any ocular or laser therapy. The glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of the subjects with diabetes were determined and based on that, they were divided into 3 subgroups as group IIa with HbA1c levels of < 7% (n = 62); group IIb with HbA1c levels of 7 to 8.0% (n = 48); and group IIc with HbA1c levels of > 8.0% (n = 40 ) All the data were expressed as means ± standard deviations. The statistical analysis was performed by the Student’s t test. The correlation between HbA1c and IOP was analyzed by the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A p value of < 0 .05 was considered to be significant.
Results: We observed that the IOP values were higher in the subjects with diabetes ( mean = 20.4 ± 3.44 ) than in the age and sex matched control groups. The mean IOP in the groups IIa, IIb and IIc were 17.32 ± 2.70 , 17.81 ± 2.76mm Hg, and 18.04 ± 2.58 mm Hg respectively. The difference in the IOP between the groups IIb and IIc was found to be statistically significant (P = .001)
Conclusion: The intra-ocular pressure was increased in the subjects with diabetes as compared to the controls and especially those subjects with a poor glycaemic control were more prone to develop an increased intra-ocular pressure.

Keywords

Intra-ocular pressure, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Glaucoma

INTRODUCTION
The fluid pressure inside our eye is called as intra-ocular pressure (IOP). The average normal intra-ocular pressure is about 15mmHg, with a range from 12 to 20mmHg. The intraocular pressure is determined by the balance between the production of the aqueous humour (the clear fluid inside the eye) and the drainage of the aqueous humor, mainly through the trabecular meshwork which is located in the anterior chamber angle. An abnormally high IOP reading indicates that either the eye is producing too much fluid, or that it is not draining properly. Glaucoma is now considered as an abnormal physiology in the optic nerve head, that interacts with the level of intra-ocular pressure (IOP), with the degree and the rate of the damage depending on the IOP and presumably, on the degree of the abnormal physiology (2). Diabetes mellitus is a group of metabolic diseases which is characterized by hyperglycaemia, resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both. The chronic hyperglycaemia in diabetes is associated with the long-term damage, dysfunction, and the failure of various organs, especially the eyes, kidneys, nerves, heart, and blood vessels, causing severe systemic complications such as retinopathy, neuropathy and nephropathy (3). In India, as of now, there are over 35 million people with diabetes, a number that is predicted to increase to around 80 million by 2030 (4). Diabetes mellitus is an important ocular risk factor. It has emerged as a major cause of vision loss and visual disability, not only in the developed countries, but also in the developing countries. Diabetes, besides its other ocular manifestations, also affects the intra-ocular pressure (5). Numerous large population based studies have shown diabetes to be a risk factor for the development of open angle glaucoma (OAG) (6),(7),(8),(9),(10),(11). However, some studies have found no association between the same (12)(13),(14). Therefore, in this study, we tried to observe the intra-ocular pressure behaviour in patients with diabetes mellitus and to find whether there was a significant difference between the intra-ocular pressure values in the patients with diabetes and the control population and also to assess the effects of chronic hyperglycaemia on the intraocular pressure.

Material and Methods

The present study included 150 subjects with diabetes, of the age range of 25-45 years, who attended the Out-Patients Department of Diabetology and Ophthalmology at SRM Medical College and Hospital, Kattankulathur, TamilNadu, India and 100 age and sex matched individuals without diabetes (control group). This research was approved by the institutional ethical committee of the SRM Medical College Hospital and Research Centre. Informed consent was taken from the volunteers for this study. Subjects with systemic hypertension, a family history of glaucoma, a habit of smoking, alcoholism, pregnancy, refractive errors, ocular infection or inflammation or the usage of ocular drugs within the previous three months, a history of ocular surgery, the usage of any medications that would affect the IOP, a history of cardiac diseases and a history of endocrinal diseases or any other major medical problems were excluded from the study. A detailed medical history was collected from all the participants and they underwent a thorough physical examination, screening laboratory tests and screening eye examinations. The screening laboratory tests included the estimation of haemoglobin, fasting and post prandial plasma glucose levels, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) levels and the serum urea and creatinine levels and random urine examination for the microalbumin/ creatinine ratio. The screening eye examinations included the assessment of visual acuity, tonometry, slit-lamp examination, and dilated fundus examination. The blood pressure was measured with the subjects in a sitting posture. The body mass index was calculated by using the formula, BMI = Weight in Kg/(Height in meters)2. The intra-ocular pressure was measured by using a Schiotz tonometer. None of the patients with diabetes had proliferative diabetic retinopathy or secondary glaucoma, none had undergone laser treatment, and none had a history of glaucoma treatment. All the patients had an open angle. The concentration of HbA1c which was formed through the non-enzymatic attachment of glucose to haemoglobin, was commonly considered to reflect the integrated mean glucose levels over the previous 8–12 weeks, the time period being dictated by the 120 day lifespan of the erythrocyte (15). The patients were prospectively divided into two groups. The group I consisted of the controls ( n = 100) and the subjects with diabetes was considered as group II ( n = 150). Group II was further divided into three sub groups according to the level of HbA1c into group IIa with HbA1c levels of < 7% (n = 48); group IIb with HbA1c 7 levels of 8.0% (n = 62); and group IIc with HbA1c levels of > 8.0% (n = 40). All the data were expressed as means + standard deviations.The statistical analysis was performed by the Student ‘s t-test. The correlation between HbA1c and IOP was analyzed by using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient. A p value of < 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

The physical characteristics of the group I (control) and the group II (subjects with diabetes) are shown in (Table/Fig 1). In the present study, the age range of the subjects was 25-45 years, with the mean age being 34.2 ± 6.116 years in group I and 35 ± 6.25 years in group II. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the means of other physical parameters like height, weight and body mass index in the groups I and group II. A significant increase in IOP was observed when group II (mean IOP = 20.4 ± 3.44) was compared with group I (mean IOP = 16 ± 2.91) and the p value was 0.001. When the IOP was related to the glycaemic status and compared between the subgroups, as in (Table/Fig 2), in group IIa, no significant difference in the IOP was observed. The IOP in the groups IIb (mean IOP = 20.98 ± 3.06) and IIc (mean IOP = 21.90±3.13) showed a significant increase (p = 0.001), with that in IIc being comparatively more than that in IIb. The correlative analysis showed a statistically significant association between the increased HbA1c and the IOP in the subjects with diabetes (r = 0.82 and 0.88 respectively in the subgroups IIb and IIc)

Discussion

Diabetes is a risk factor for glaucoma, which is the second leading cause for blindness (5). However, it has not yet been clearly established as to how diabetes affects the intra-ocular pressure. Our results showed that the subjects with diabetes, with no previous history of ocular hypertension, had a significantly higher mean IOP (20.4 ± 3.44 mm Hg ) than the normal control group (16 ± 2.91 mm Hg), which was matched for age, sex and body mass index. These findings are consistent with the conclusions of other investigators (16),(17). Our results also confirmed the hypothesis that the subjects with diabetes, with chronic hyperglycaemia (indicated by elevated HbA1c levels), have far higher IOP than the subjects with newly diagnosed diabetes (comparatively lower HbA1C levels), as shown in (Table/Fig 2). The relationship between elevated intra-ocular pressure, diabetes, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), and insulin resistance has been well documented in several studies (12), (18),(19),(20). Davies et al (21) have reported that the glucose levels in the aqueous humor of patients with diabetes were significantly higher (3.2 mM vs. 7.8 mM) as compared to the glucose levels in persons without diabetes. Although the reason for the increased incidence of open-angle glaucoma in persons with diabetes has not been elucidated, it is likely that the diabetes associated changes in the trabecular extra-cellular matrix may contribute to a decreased aqueous outflow. A high glucose level induces fibronectin overexpression in the trabecular meshwork cells and may contribute to excess fibronectin accumulation in the trabecular meshwork. High glucose–induced fibronectin upregulation may be a common biochemical link that on the one hand, contributes to the development of thickened vascular basement membranes in diabetic microangiopathy and on the other hand, alters the structural content, compromises resiliency, reduces cellularity,blocks the aqueous outflow in the trabecular meshwork and leads to the development of POAG in persons with diabetes (22). Diabetes is known to cause microvascular damage and it may affect the vascular auto regulation of the retina and the optic nerve. The development of glaucomatous optic nerve damage, based on the visual field loss and/or the optic disc findings, is more likely to be associated with high intraocular pressure (13). Besides an increased intra-ocular pressure (IOP), a disturbed microcirculation at the level of the optic nerve head, as well as a primary neurodegenerative component, are thought to contribute to glaucomatous optic neuropathy (23). In addition to altering the vascular tissues, diabetes mellitus brings about a compromise on the glial and neuronal functions and the metabolism in the retina, which can make the retinal neurons including the retinal ganglion cells, more susceptible to glaucomatous damage (24). Furthermore, diabetes mellitus increases the susceptibility of the retinal ganglion cells to additional stresses which relate to OAG, such as elevated IOP (25). It seems reasonable to consider that a poor glycaemic control in subjects with diabetes mellitus, with a prolonged insult to the retina, would be associated with a higher risk of OAG.

Conclusion

The intra-ocular pressure was increased in subjects with diabetes as compared to the controls and especially those subjects with a poor glycaemic control were more prone to develop increased intra-ocular pressure. Since the prevalence of glaucoma is increased in subjects with diabetes, our observations of increased IOP in a group of patients who were taken from a diabetic OP, would suggest that the IOP of subjects with diabetes should be measured routinely at regular intervals to detect the development of ocular hypertension at an early stage. Thus, diabetes is a modifiable risk factor for open angle glaucoma. Interestingly, in our study, those with higher HbA1C values had an even higher intra ocular pressure. This suggests that an improved blood sugar control may indeed aid in better intra-ocular pressure control. This study may require further investigations in a large number of subjects.

Acknowledgement

I would like to thank our dean, Dr. James Pandian, M.S, M.Ch (plastic surgery) for his encouragement, Dr. S. MohanRaj, M.S (Ophthalmology), Professor and Head, Department of Ophthalmology for his constant support throughout the study, Dr. P. Ganesh Kumar MD, Community Medicine and Dr. P. Venkataraman, PhD, Medical Research, SRM Medical College, for their help in the study.

References

1.
Quigley HA, Broman AT. The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020. Br J Ophthalmol. 2006; 90(3): 262–67.
2.
Anderson DR. Normal-tension glaucoma (Low-tension glaucoma). Indian J Ophthalmol 2011;59:97-101.
3.
Marshall SM, Flyvbjerg A. Prevention and early detection of vascular complications of diabetes. BMJ. 2006; 333:475-80.
4.
Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. The global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for the year 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004; 27(5):1047-53.
5.
Arora VK, Prasad VN. Intra-ocular pressure and diabetes-A correlative study. Indian J Ophthalmol 1989;37:10-12.
6.
Klein BE, Klein R, Linton KL. The intra-ocular pressure in an American community. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Invest Opthalmol Vis Sci. 1992;33:2224-28.
7.
Katz J, Sommer A. The risk factors for primary open angle glaucoma. Am J Prev Med. 1988; 4:110 -14.
8.
Quigley HA. Open-angle glaucoma. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:1097-06.
9.
Wise LA, Rosenberg L, Radin RG, Mattox C, Yang EB, Palmer JR, et al., A prospective study of diabetes, lifestyle factors, and glaucoma among African-American women. Ann Epidemiol. 2011; 21(6):430-39.
10.
Mitchell P, Smith W, Chey T, Healey PR. Open-angle glaucoma and diabetes: the Blue Mountains Eye Study, Australia. Opthalmology 1997;104:712-18.
11.
Chopra V, Varma R, Francis B A., Wu J, Torres M, Stanley P. Azen Los Angeles Latino Eye Study Group, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Risk of Open-angle Glaucoma The Los Angeles Latino Eye Study, Ophthalmology 2008;115:227-32.
12.
Tielsch JM, Katz J, Quigley HA, Javitt JC, Sommer A. Diabetes, intraocular pressure and primary open-angle glaucoma in the Baltimore Eye Survey. Ophthalmology. 1995;102:48-53.
13.
Leske MC, Connell AM, Wu SY, et al. Risk factors for open-angle glaucoma:the Barbados Eye study. Arch Opthalmol 1995;113: 918-24.
14.
Wormald RP, Basauri E,Wright LA, Evans JR. The African Caribbean eye survey:risk factors for glaucoma in a sample of African Caribbean people living in London. Eye 1994;8:315-20.
15.
Nathan DM, Turgeon H, Regan S. Relationship between glycated haemoglobin levels and mean glucose levels over time. Diabetologia. 2007;50(11):2239-44.
16.
Tomoyose E, Higa A, Sakai H, Sawaguchi S, Iwase A, Tomidokoro A et al. Intra-ocular pressure and related systemic and ocular biometric factors in a population-based study in Japan: The Kumejima study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010;150(2):279-86.
17.
Coleman AL, Kodjebacheva G. Risk factors for glaucoma needing more attention. Ophthalmol J. 2009;3:38-42.
18.
Carel RS, Korczyn AD, Rock M, Goya I. Association between ocular pressure and certain health parameters. Opthalmology. 1984;91: 311-14.
19.
Chang YC, Lin JW, Wang LC, Chen HM, Hwang JJ, Chaung LM.Association of intra-ocular pressure with the metabolic syndrome and novel cardiometabolic risk factors. Eye. 2010;24:1037-43.
20.
Tan GS, Wong TY, Fong CW, Aung T.Singapore Malay Eye Study. Diabetes,metabolic abnormalities and glaucoma. Arch Opthalmol. 2009;127:1354-61.
21.
Davies PD, Duncan G, Pynsent PB, Arber DL, Lucas VA. Aqueous humour glucose concentration in cataract patients and its effect on the lens. Exp Eye Res. 1984; 39:605–09.
22.
Sato T, Roy S. Effect of high glucose on fibronectin expression and cell proliferation in trabecular meshwork cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002; 43(1):170-5.
23.
Flammer J, Orgul S, Costa V P. et al The impact of ocular blood flow in glaucoma. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002; 21(4) 359–93.
24.
Nakamura M, Kanamori A, Negi A. Diabetes mellitus as a risk factor for glaucomatous optic neuropathy. Opthalmologica. 2005;219:1-10.
25.
Kanamori A, Nakamura M, Mukuno H et al. Diabetes has an addictive effect on neural apoptosis in rat retina with chronically elevated intraocular pressure. Curr Eye Res. 2004;28:47-54.

DOI and Others

JCDR/2011/1688

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com