Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 10336

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionKey MessageReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2011 | Month : November | Volume : 5 | Issue : 7 | Page : 1327 - 1330 Full Version

Effect of Duration of Noise Exposure on Auditory Impairment in the Population of Bangalore City

Published: November 1, 2011 | DOI:
Irshad Ahamed KS, Mohsin Shaikh, Muneeb Jehan, Shamshad Begum, Muhammad Ismail Khan

1. MBBS, MD (Physiology), Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS), Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. MBBS, MD (Preventive and Social Medicine), The Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Gujarat, India. 3. MBBS, MD (Physiology), Deccan College of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India. 4. Assistant Professor of Physiology, BLDEA’s shri B.M. Patil Medical College, Bijapur, Karnataka, India 5. Department of Physiology, College of Medicine, Qassim University, KSA

Correspondence Address :
Irshad Ahamed KS
C/O Mohammed Khasim, Ward No – 22,
House No -212, Opp. Akshaya General Stores, J.P. Nagar,
Hospet – 583201 (post), Bellary (dist), Karnataka (State), India.
Phone No : +91-9902951526
E mail :


Background and Objectives: Noise pollution in an urban city like Bangalore is a serious problem and is steadily increasing over the years. The relationship between duration of noise exposure and hearing loss in normal subjects residing in an urban city like Bangalore is yet to be investigated. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between duration of noise exposure and degree of auditory impairment in a crosssectional population of Bangalore city.

Methods: 219 normal subjects residing in noisy roads in four geographical areas belonged to the research group were subjected to a pure tone audiometric assessment. The resulting data was statistically analyzed with SPSS software.

Results: The auditory threshold (degree of hearing impairment) was very high in subjects which exposed to noise for more than 15 years than the subjects who were exposed to noise below 15 years at the frequencies 1000, 1500, 2000, 3000, 4000, 6000 and 8000 Hz in both ears.

Conclusion: The duration of exposure to noise had a direct effect on degree of hearing impairment in subjects of noisy areas. Subjects residing in noisy areas have an increased risk of noise induced hearing loss.


Noise, audiometry, hearing loss

Technology development in commerce, communication and education has enhanced the urban growth both in developed and developing countries (1). There have been many references on the effect of exposure of noise on hearing impairment and because of that there have been hearing impairment in many people of Bangalore city which needs to be investigated. The sources of community of noise include traffic, railway, aircraft and construction. The traffic includes large trucks, motorcycles, constant traffic etc. An individual’s noise exposure is a measure of the noise experienced by the individual over a period of time. A noise level is a measure of noise at a given instant in time. The noise levels rarely persist consistently over a long period of time and the community noise varies continuously with time with respect to the contributing sound sources of the community noise environment. It is primarily the product of many distant noise sources, which constitute a relatively stable background noise exposure, with individual contributors unidentifiable (2).The evidence of noise induced hearing loss is strong and comes from historical, observational and animal studies. The cause and effect relationship between noise exposure and hearing loss has been appreciated for many years. “Boilermaker’s deafness” was a term coined in the 1700’s and 1800’s to a high frequency hearing loss seen in laborers who could be diagnosed with tuning fork (3). Of the more than 28 million Americans with some degree of hearing impairment, as many as 10 million have hearing loss caused inpart by excessive noise exposure (4). A recent study by Mysore based All India institute of Speech and Hearing (AIISH) has found that noise levels in all major roads in Bangalore city are over 80 dB while permissible levels are only 65 dB (5). It has been well established that exposure to traffic noise causes annoyance, hearing loss, mental disorders and adverse physiological and psychological impacts. The situation of Bangalore, due to rapid urbanization needs to be investigated, which may be one of the precipitating factors of increased stress related disorders. Diagnostic audiometry comprises of tests which detect conductive and sensorineural hearing loss. Pure tone audiometry involves the estimation of threshold of hearing for certain standardized stimuli via the air and bone conduction routes (6). An audiometer, being a fundamental tool in the diagnosis of auditory capacities has been employed to evaluate an auditory acuity in a cross-sectional population in different areas of Bangalore city.

Material and Methods

The study was conducted on a sample of 271 normal subjects after informed, written and verbal consent in Bangalore between April to September 2006. Our research comprised of 219 normal subjects working in noisy roads in four geographical areas (West, North, South and East). The West, North, South and East area was recognized as Noisy area No. 1, 2, 3 and 4 respectively which included 56, 56, 54 and 53 subjects respectively. The selection of subjects was based on the fact that they were staying in differentnoisy areas (exposed to traffic noise for 8 hours/day or more for a duration of 15 years or more). This group included street-vendors, shopkeepers along with the roadside, traffic policemen, drivers and conductors of BMTC (“Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation”). The selection of subjects was based on inclusionexclusion criteria. Inclusion criteria included age group between 20 to 50 yrs and subjects who were staying in selected noisy areas for at least fifteen years while the patients suffering from hypertension, diabetes or patients using ototoxic drugs since the previous 3 months or having a history of ear surgeries or recent ear, nose, throat infections were excluded. Prior approval from Institutional ethics committee was taken for the said research.

The Pure Tone Audiometry (PTA) was conducted on all subjects with the help of an audiometer and results were noted. The selected subject was required to answer a detailed questionnaire exploring their hearing status (7). The subject was also subjected to an otological examination to rule out any external and middle ear pathologies. A detailed general physical and systemic examination was done, and the subject was taken to a sound-proof room for an audiometric testing. The method was based on the American Society for Speech and Hearing Association [ASHA] 1978 Guidelines for PTA. Masking (Masking PTA) was done to mask the ear not under test and when the air bone gap of the poorer ear under test was more than 10 dB (8).


In the present study, there were two groups of subjects, one group consisting of 219 normal subjects residing in noisy roads in four geographical areas (West, North, South, East).

(Table/Fig 1),(Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4) show the results of the subjects working in noisy areas. It was prepared and rearranged as per requirement of the parameters discussed. It is important to first appreciate that the noise levels in the urban city of Bangalore are above 80 dB in all major roads which is above permissible levels (5). The actual effect of noise on auditory acuity of normal subjects residing in noisy roads is unknown. In this study, the subjects belonging to noisy area 1, 2, 3, 4 have been selected and matched with respect to age to remove the effect of presbycusis (9). It is of the prime importance to appreciate that the noise induced hearing loss develops gradually and noise can cause permanent hearing loss at chronic exposure of 85 dB or higher for an eight hour period (3). It is said that 10 years or more of exposure is generally required for significant hearing loss to occur. Hence, in the present study only those subjects were selected who were staying in the respective area for a minimum of 10 years and exposed to noise for a period of minimum 8 hrs/day. The noise induced hearing loss begins with selective loss of hearing at around 4000 Hz, with thresholds better at both higher and lower frequencies which can be interpreted while comparing the auditory mean threshold of (Table/Fig 1) to (Table/Fig 4) at various frequencies. This is recognized on an audiogram as a notch centered around 4000 Hz. If exposure is continued, the notch gradually deepens and widens, eventually retention of good hearing in the higher frequencies is lost and the resulting hearing loss appears only as a relatively steep high frequency loss at 3000 Hz and becoming more severe at each higher frequency over a period of many years. Persistent noise exposure progressively encroaches on middle frequencies and in most severe cases, even the lower frequencies may become involved (9). (Table/Fig 5)compares the auditory thresholds of right and left ear in noisy areas 1,2,3 and 4.


In this study, the auditory acuity of normal subjects residing in noisy areas were studied and it showed that exposure to noise raises the auditory threshold in frequencies between 1000 to 8000 Hz in the age group of the people selected for this research. The auditory thresholds were mostly affected in higher frequency range with highest threshold at 4000 Hz and relatively lower at 1000 and 8000 Hz. The auditory thresholds were almost similar in both the ears signifying sensorineural hearing loss. Overall, the mean auditory thresholds of subjects exposed to noise more than15 years were higher as compared with subjects exposed to noise less than 15 years. Our findings are very well in correlation with the research on ‘Effect of traffic noise on hearing loss of people’, which shows a strong direct association between noise induced hearing loss and the duration of exposure time (10).

Key Message

The noise above the maximum limited level is extremely harmful to normal ability of the persons to hear and the duration of noise exposure is directly proportional to hearing impairment.


Joshi SK, Devkota S, Chamling S, Shrestha S. Environmental noise induced hearing loss in Nepal. Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2003) Vol. 1, No. 3, 177-83.
Environmental, setting impacts, and mitigation measures [access date 2004 October 7]. Available from: URL: http://WWW.semprafiber-fig. net/deir/4_5_noise.pdf.
Rosen EJ. Noise induced hearing loss. Grand Rounds Presentation, UTMB, Dept. of Otolaryngology. 2001 January 10. [access date 2006 March 16]. Available from: URL: Hear-Loss-Noise-000110/Hear-Loss-Noise.pdf
Rabinowitz PM. Noise induced hearing loss. American Academy of Family Physicians. 2000 May 1; 61:2749-56, 2759-60.
Noise City. Noise pollution can lead to several health risks. Deccan Herald. 2006 June 16. [access date 2006 August 20]. Available from: URL: editpage.asp
Kerr AG, Stephans D. Scott-Brown’s Otolaryngology: Adult Audiology; volume 2; 6th edition, pp 2/1/6-9, Butterworth Heinemann, 1997.
Sanders JW, Katz J. Silverman’s text book of audiometry. pp 10-65, Williams and Wilkins 1982.
Sandra Gordon-Salant. Determining Threshold Level for Speech, American speech and hearing Association, committee on audiometric evaluation (1978a). Guidelines for manual pure tone threshold audiometry. Asha, 20: 297-301.
Jorgensen MB. Histological studies on changes of aging in the inner ear. Arch Otolaryngol 1961; 74: 56-62.
Itrat Jawed. The effect of traffic noise on the hearing level of people on Karachi streets, Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, October 2010; 60-10, 813-6.

DOI and Others


JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)