Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 40054

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionAcknowledgementReferences
Readers' Comments (0) Article in PDF Audio Visual Citation Manager Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Archana Dambal

"Journal of clinical and diagnostic research is a welcome change in publishing practices. It aims to reach out to the grass-root level researchers who do not lack in experience, clinical material and ideas, but lack in their knowledge in English language and statistics. The journal achieves it's aim by supporting in these exact domains.
It also gives due credit to all research designs like descriptive and qualitative studies while many journals ignore these important study designs. The rigorous review process does not allow any compromise in quality
It is indexed in many indexing agencies and the articles are available under creative commons licence free of cost
The frequency of publication supports many aspiring authors from India and other countries.
It's wide scope welcomes articles across various specialities in medicine. In an era when there is an unscientific insistence on speciality specific research by regulatory bodies in medical education, JCDR supports collaborative research across specialities. I wish the publisher all the best in his future endeavors."



Dr. Archana Dambal
Department of General Medicine,
Belgaum Institute of Medical Sciences,Belgaum, Karnataka,INDIA,
On 30 Nov 2018




Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2009 | Month : June | Volume : 3 | Issue : 3 | Page : 1562 - 1568

Perceptions And Barriers Towards Provision Of Health Promotion Activities Among Community Pharmacists In The State Of Penang, Malaysia

HASSALI MA *, SUBISH P**, AA SHAFIE***, MIM IBRAHIM****

*Senior Lecturer, **PhD student, ***Lecturer, ****Associate Professor Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, UniversitiSains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia.

Correspondence Address :
Dr Mohamed Azmi Ahmad Hassali, PhD Senior Lecturer, Discipline of Social and Administrative Pharmacy,School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia,11800 Minden, Penang, Malaysia. E-mail: azmihassali@gmail.com, azmihassali@ usm.my Tel: +604-6534085.

Abstract

Introduction: Health promotion is the process of enabling people to increase control over their health and to improve their health. Within this context, the community pharmacist, as one of the most accessible healthcare practitioners, plays a major role in the provision of health promotion activities to the society at large.
Objectives: To document the current level of involvement with health promotion activities among community pharmacists in the State of Penang, Malaysia
Methods: A cross-sectional study using a validated questionnaire was undertaken with a convenient sample of community pharmacists practicing in the State of Penang. The completed questionnaires were analyzed as per the study objectives.
Results: A total of 100 questionnaires were distributed to 100 community pharmacists practicing in Penang state. At the end of the survey, 80 questionnaires were collected back (response rate: 80%). The top five health promotion activities currently undertaken by community pharmacists, were weight management (n=74, 92.5%), diabetes counseling (n=73, 91.3%), traditional and complementary medicine counseling (n=67, 83.8%), nutrition and physical activity (n=66, 82.5%) and asthma counseling (n=65, 81.3%). Most of the respondents (n=60, 75.1%) either strongly agreed or agreed that lack of time is the barrier limiting them from involving in health promotion activities. Only 23 (28.8%) respondents stated lack of profitability as a reason for not taking part in health promotion activities. A majority of the respondents (n=79, 98.8%) were aware that health promotion is part of the pharmacist’s responsibility. We found 62 (77.5%) respondents who provided health education and promotion programs to the public.
Conclusion: Most of the community pharmacists in Penang showed a high confidence in providing health promotion activities. Still, there are lots of obstacles for the community pharmacists to overcome in order to involve themselves in health promotion activities. Training and continual support in terms of continuing professional development and life-long learning is essential to empower the community pharmacists.

Keywords

Community pharmacists, perception, barrier, health promotion activities.

How to cite this article :

HASSALI MA ,SUBISH P,AA SHAFIE, MIM IBRAHIM. PERCEPTIONS AND BARRIERS TOWARDS PROVISION OF HEALTH PROMOTION ACTIVITIES AMONG COMMUNITY PHARMACISTS IN THE STATE OF PENANG, MALAYSIA. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research [serial online] 2009 June [cited: 2019 Aug 20 ]; 3:1562-1568. Available from
http://www.jcdr.net/back_issues.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2009&month=June&volume=3&issue=3&page=1562-1568&id=490

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines health as the ‘state of complete physical, mental and social well-being, and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’(1). This WHO definition emphasizes wellness and the social, environmental, and economic factors that may influence the behaviours affecting the people’s health. Public health is defined as an organized community effort to protect, promote, improve, or restore the community’s or population’s health[ 2]. Health promotion and disease prevention technologies and interventions encompass the 3 core functions of public health, that include assessing and monitoring at-risk populations to identify health problems and priorities; formulating public policies in collaboration with community and government leaders; and assuring that people have access to appropriate and cost-effective care(2),(3). Health promotion is any combination of interventions (i.e., health education and related organizational, economic, and/or political interventions) designed to facilitate behavioural or environmental changes that will improve or protect public health (3). Health promotion strategies focus on community based interventions and partnerships to maintain wellness and to help modify individual behaviours such as unhealthy lifestyles. In other words, health promotion involves community interventions that help a person increase control over and improve his or her own health (4).

Pharmacists are knowledgeable specialists who are currently under utilized in the primary health care team. They are experts in medicines, minor illnesses and health, they have 4 years of undergraduate training and a pre-registration competency based training year, and are expected to undertake continuing professional development. Community pharmacists can be accessible sources for health promotion(5),(6),(7). Pharmacies are recognized as the most accessible healthcare services in the community, with over 90% of the population visiting them during one year(5),(6),(7),(8). Community pharmacists are patronized by both healthy and sick people, thus having access to a large proportion of the population—before a major illness or disease is evident(9).

It is well recognized that pharmacists act as health advisors to the general public (10) and they are acknowledged as highly credible sources of health information (11),(12). Because they are recognized as credible sources of information and because of their accessibility, availability and frequent contact with the public, community pharmacists could provide an important channel for the delivery of these kinds of activities(13),(14),(15). This recurring interest of pharmacists as health educators in the public health role is considerable (16),(17). Partially, because of these continuing reassessments and the ongoing changes in the health care system, professional pharmacy associations are increasingly interested in health promotion and disease prevention as a way to effectively position this profession in the 21st century (13),(14),(17).While evidence that people can do much to promote their own health is intensifying, the role of pharmacists in assisting patients is not well documented (18), (19),(20). In one of the few studies reported to date, Paluck et al (21). reported that there is considerable room for increasing pharmacist involvement in health education and disease prevention activities. Implementing changes in health behaviours among community residents is challenging. O'Loughlin et al (9). has suggested that there is less interest in prevention activities targeting smoking, diet, and physical activity, because the pharmacists may feel that these areas are too far removed from the traditional role of dispensing medication. So far, there is no study in Malaysia that has evaluated the perceptions and barriers towards the provision of health promotion activities among community pharmacists. Hence, we undertook the present study with the following objectives.

1. To identify the involvement and the types of health promotion activities provided by the community pharmacists and
2. To identify the barriers which limit the Involvement of community pharmacists in health promotion activities.

Material and Methods

Study Design
A cross-sectional survey design.

Sample Size And Sampling Method
Using the convenience sampling method, 100 community pharmacists in Penang State were approached by the researchers and were invited to participate in the research. Face-to-face and individual interviews were carried out in the workplace of the pharmacists and the questionnaires distributed were collected immediately to minimize the bias that might occur. At the end of the study period, a total of 80 respondents participated in the study (Response rate: 80%).

Questionnaires
(Table/Fig 1)The questionnaire used, was divided into four domains. The first domain consisted of the demographic details of the respondents. The second domain consisted of questions related to the degree of involvement in health promotion activities. The third domain consisted of questions relating to the types of health promotion activities that were currently provided by respondents. The final domain consisted of questions pertaining to the barriers that limited the involvement of community pharmacists in health promotion activities.

Data Analysis
All the data obtained was then examined and the responses were coded. The data was then descriptively analysed and an appropriate non-parametric test (Chi-square tests) was applied, using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software (SPSS version 15.0). A P-value of less than 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

A total of 80 community pharmacists were interviewed. Among the 80, 43 (53.8%) were males and 37 (46.3%) were females. The demographic characteristics of the respondents are listed in (Table/Fig 2).

Involvement Of Community Pharmacists In Health Promotion Activities
Pharmacists were found to be involved in health promotion activities at variable degrees, but the activity that most pharmacists were very involved in, was diabetes counseling (n = 6, 32.5%). The details regarding the involvement of the community pharmacists in health promotion are listed in (Table/Fig 3).

Types Of Health Promotion Activities That Community Pharmacists Provide
Most community pharmacists were found to provide diabetes counseling (n = 53, 66.3%), but very few provided immunization and special population counseling. The various types of health promotional activities that are provided by the community pharmacists are listed in (Table/Fig 4).

Barriers That Limit The Involvement Of Community Pharmacists In Health Promotion Activities
Most community pharmacists (n = 60, 75.1%) identified lack of time as the barrier that limited their involvement in conducting health promotion activities. The barriers that limited the involvement of community pharmacists in health promotion activities are listed in (Table/Fig 5).


Discussion

Recently, there has been an increased interest in broadening the role of community pharmacists beyond the traditional product-oriented functions of dispensing and distributing medication, to involve them in a greater role in public health. More specifically, counseling with the objective of providing patients with risk-management information or of improving compliance with prescribed medication, are viewed as tasks particularly well suited to pharmacists(8). Because they are recognized as credible sources of information8 and because of their accessibility, availability, and frequent contact with the public, community pharmacists could provide an important channel for the delivery of these kinds of activities(12),(22),(23).

There are many case reports describing the engaging of community pharmacists in nontraditional tasks including patient education(16),(23),(24),(25),(26), counseling(27),(28),(29),(30), follow-up to detect noncompliance (32), referral (33) and screening for risk factors of chronic diseases (31),(32),(33). However, there are almost no systematic studies documenting the level of participation by pharmacists in health education and disease prevention activities. In one of the few studies reported to date, Paluck et al (21). surveyed a random representative sample of 485 community pharmacists (one-quarter of all the communities in British Columbia), concerning their level of participation in health education and disease prevention activities.

In the present study, there are no statistically significant differences noted between the sociodemographic aspects and the barriers that limit the community pharmacists from providing health promotion.

It was observed that most of the respondents (n=60, 75.1%) agreed that lack of time was a barrier that limited them from involving in health promotion activities. However, Hidalgo Cabrera et al. noticed that the ‘‘lack of time’’ priority diminished with increasing knowledge in pharmaceutical care issues. These issues have only recently been incorporated in pharmaceutical education (34).

The non-availability of standard guidelines for offering health education was also highly agreed by the respondents as a barrier, which limited them from providing health promotion activities. This was followed by insufficient management support which has also hindered community pharmacists from not involving themselves in health promotion activities. The total numbers of respondents that agreed with the statement was 42 (52.5%). The fourth and fifth barriers that have a higher number of respondents, agreed with them as barriers that limit pharmacists from involving in health promotion activities are lack of training 38 (47.6%) and lack of reimbursement for health promotion activities from consumers 29 (36.3%). There were a small number of respondents (n=23.28.8 %) who agreed that lack of profitability was the barrier that limited them from involving in health promotion activities. At the international level, ‘‘lack of time’’ and ‘‘lack of specific training’’ are ranked as major barriers (34),(35),(36),(37).

Limitations Of Our Study
Our study had a few limitations. The survey that was conducted, was only confined to the community pharmacists in the state of Penang. Thus, the findings that were obtained only show the perceptions of community pharmacists in the state of Penang, which might not be generalized to community pharmacists in other states of Malaysia.

Conclusion

A majority of the community pharmacists participated in diabetes counseling. The study showed that lack of time is the major barrier that limits the community pharmacists to remain active in health promotion activities. A majority of the respondents were aware that health promotion is part of the pharmacist’s responsibility. Most of the community pharmacists have provided health education and promotion programs for the public.

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge YS Law, BH Lee, MK Lee, SF Lee, PH Lim, WY Lim, MF Hayati, MI Shuhairi, MM Zaman, MS Sharif, NM Saffie, the pharmacy undergraduates from the School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia, for helping them to carry out the data collection.

References

1.
. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. New York, 19-22 June, 1946. Available at: http://www.who.int/about/definition/en/ Accessed on October 18, 2008.
2.
. Turnock BJ. Public health: what it is and how it works, 3rd ed. Sudbury, Mass; Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 2004.
3.
. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Public Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1988.
4.
. World Health Organization. Health Promotion Glossary. Available at: http://www.wpro.who.int/hpr/docs/glossary.pdf. Accessed on January 31, 2009.
5.
. Anderson C. Health promotion in community pharmacy: the UK situation. Patient Educ Couns 2000; 39: 285-91.
6.
. Krass I, Hourihan F, Chen T. Health promotion and screening for cardiovascular risk factors in NSW: a community pharmacy model. Health Promot J Aust 2003; 14: 101-7.
7.
. Mayer JA, Eckhardt L, Stepanski BM, Sallis JF, Elder JP, Slymen DJ, et al. Promoting skin cancer prevention counseling by pharmacists. Am J Public health 1998; 88: 1096-9.
8.
. Benrimoj SI, Frommer MS. Community pharmacy in Australia. Aust HealthRev 2004; 28: 238-46.
9.
. Blenkinsopp A, Panton R, Anderson C. Health promotion for pharmacists.2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
10.
. De Young M. Research on the effects of pharmacist-patient communication in institutions and ambulatory care sites, 1969-1994. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 1996; 53:1277-91.
11.
. Molzon JA. What kinds of patient counseling are required? Am Pharm. 1992; NS32(3):50-7.
12.
. Zellmer WA. Reassessing patient counseling. Am J Hosp Pharm 1991; 48:1453
13.
. American Pharmaceutical Association. Pharmacist Practice Activity Classification 1.0. [On-line] 1998. Available at http://aphanet.org /APhA/practiceclass.html. Accessed May 10, 1999.
14.
. American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy. Educational Outcomes. Alexandria, Va; 1994.
15.
. Trinca CE. The pharmacists' progress toward implementing pharmaceutical care. Am Pharm. 1995 (suppl 13):8-15.
16.
. Maguire T. Is the community pharmacist a health educator? Pharm J. 1990; 245: 556-9.
17.
. Dombrowski SR. Pharmacist counseling on nutrition and physical activity -- part 1 of 2: understanding current guidelines. J Am Pharm Assoc. 1999; 39:479-91.
18.
. O'Loughlin J, Masson P, Dery V, Fagnan D. The role of community pharmacists in health education and disease prevention: A survey of their interests and needs in relation to cardiovascular disease. Prev Med. 1999; 28:324-31.
19.
. Kotecki JE, Elanjian SI, Torabi, MR, Clark JK. Pharmacists' concerns and suggestions related to the sale of tobacco and alcohol by pharmacies. J Comm Hlth. 1998;23:359-70.
20.
. Kotecki JE, Fowler JB, German TC, et al. Kentucky pharmacists' opinions and practices related to the sale of cigarettes and alcohol in pharmacies. J Comm Hlth. 2000; 25:343-55.
21.
. Paluck EC, Stratton TP, Eni, GO. Community pharmacists' participation in health education and disease prevention activities. Can J Public Hlth. 1994; 85:389-92.
22.
. World Health Organization. Health Promotion Glossary. Available at: http://www.wpro.who.int/hpr/docs/glossary.pdf. Accessed on January 31, 2005.
23.
. Anderson C. Health promotion by community pharmacists perceptions, realities and constraints. J Soc Admin Pharm 1998; 15:10–22.
24.
. Anderson C. Health promotion by community pharmacists: consumers’ views. Int J Pharm Pract 1998; 6:2–12.
25.
. Coper L. Encouraging health professionals to be effective health educators. Hygie 1993; 12:5–8.
26.
. Fincham JE, Smith MC. Pharmacists’ views about health promotion practices. J Community Health 1988; 13:115–23.
27.
. Consumer Advisory Board. Patient education materials: suggestions for improvement. Am Pharm 1989; NS29:34–6.
28.
. Hodges ID, Wilkie A, Drennan C, Toop L, Thornley P, O’Hagan J, Town GI. A community wide promotion of asthma self-management: process evaluation. N Z Med J 1993; 106:354–7.
29.
. Rudolph N, Jones IF. Community pharmacists and the extended role. Pharm J 1989; 242 Suppl. R:R1–R3.
30.
. Martin S. Traditional values, innovative practices: pharmacists who provide cognitive services. Am Pharm 1990; NS30:22–7.
31.
. Einarson TR, Bootman JL, Larson LN, McGhan WF. Blood level testing in a community pharmacy: consumer demand and finan cial feasibility. Am Pharm 1988; NS28:76–90.
32.
. Furmanga EM. Pharmacist management of a hyperlipidemia clinic. Am J Hosp Pharm 1993; 50:91–5.
33.
. Smith MD, McGhan WF, Lauger G. Pharmacist counseling and outcomes of smoking cessation. Am Pharm 1995; NS35:29–9.
34.
. McKenney JM. An evaluation of cholesterol screening in commu nity pharmacies. Am Pharm 1993; NS33:34–40.
35.
. Crawford N. The pharmacists officentre: providing quality care Am Pharm 1992; NS32:36–8.
36.
. Nykamp D, BarnettCW. Use of stationary automated blood pres sure devices in pharmacies. Am Pharm 1992; NS32:33–6
37.
. Martı´nez-Martı´nez F. Barreras para la implementacio´n del Martı´nez-Martı´nez F. Barreras para la implementacio´n del seguimiento farmacoterape´utico en farmacias comunitarias de Granada (Espan˜a). [Barriers for implementing pharmacotherapy follow-up in community pharmacies from Granada (Spain)] Seguimiento farmacoterape´utico 2005;33:144–9.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com