Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 53843

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferences
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"

Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."

Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018

Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."

Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018

Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."

Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
On Sep 2018

Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."

Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata

Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".

Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
On Aug 2018

Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".

Dr. Mamta Gupta
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018

Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.

Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."

Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
On May 11,2011

Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."

Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
On April 2011

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.

Dr. Anuradha
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2008 | Month : December | Volume : 2 | Issue : 6 | Page : 1210 - 1214 Full Version

Giant Schwannoma In The Pelvic Retroperitoneum

Published: December 1, 2008 | DOI:

*Assistant Professor,**Assoc.Professor,***PG Resident,****Professor,Department of General Surgery,Fr. Muller Medical College Hospital,Kankanady,Mangalore–575002(D.K.),Karnataka.(India)

Correspondence Address :
Dr.Leo Francis Tauro,Departmentof General Surgery,Fr. Muller Medical College Hospital,Kankanady,Mangalore–575002 (D.K.),Karnataka.(India)Ph.No:Hosp:(0824)2436301,Res(0824)-2224911 E-Mail:


Schwannoma (neurilemmoma) is a peripheral nerve sheath tumour and commonly occurs on the head, neck and trunk. Giant schwannoma is rarely located on the retro peritoneum and the pelvic cavity. The majority of symptoms caused by the tumour are due to its mass effect. Surgical resection is enough to treat the tumour. Schwannoma is usually a benign tumour. Its malignant transformation is usually very rare. We report a 60 year male patient with giant pelvic schwannoma which presented with urinary symptoms.


Schwannoma, retroperitoneal space, neurilemmoma, computed tomography. (CT).

Schwannoma (neurilemmoma) is a peripheral nerve sheath tumour and commonly occurs on the head, neck and trunk. Giant Schwannoma is rarely located on the retro peritoneum and the pelvic cavity. The majority of symptoms caused by the tumour are due to its mass effect. Surgical resection is enough to treat a tumour(1). Schwannoma is usually a benign tumour. Its malignant transformation is usually very rare(2). We report a 60 year old male patient with giant pelvic schwannoma which presented with urinary symptoms.

Case Report

A 76 year – old – male patient presented with a 6 month old abdominal mass with abnormal urinary frequency and urgency, and burning micturition for 1 week. There was no history of bowel disturbances. On general physical examination, no abnormality was detected. Abdominal examination revealed a non tender, firm, fixed, retroperitoneal mass of 12x14 cm size with smooth surface and well defined borders, in the supra pubic region extending into the pelvis. The inferior border was merging in to the pelvic cavity. There was no hepatosplenomegly. Rectal examination revealed prostatomegaly.

His routine haematological investigation and urine analysis were within normal limits. His blood urea, serum creatinine and liver function tests were within normal limits. His serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) value was 8.40 ng/ml. Abdominal ultrasonography revealed a complex mass measuring 14x10 cms in the pelvis with hyper echoic areas. Bilateral hydronephrosis was noted. CT scan was suggested for further evaluation. CT scan of abdomen revealed a large retroperitoneal, heterogeneously enhancing complex cystic lesion measuring 10x13 cms. It was located predominantly at the right side of the pelvis, extending into the abdomen up to the level of aortic bifurcation. No calcified areas were detected. The lesion was displacing the bladder postero- inferiorly and the bowel loops laterally. The right ureter was displaced medially. Prostatomegaly was present (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2). Ultra sound guided FNAC of the mass revealed vascularised fibro- collagenous tissue, without any evidence of malignancy.

The abdomen was opened through the lower midline incision. A huge retroperitoneal mass was noted in the pelvis, extending upwards, without any posterior infiltration into the surrounding structures. The peritoneum over the mass was opened, and complete excision of the mass was done, with blunt dissection.(Table/Fig 3)and (Table/Fig 4) Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed a capsulated mass showing cellular areas with spindle shaped cells, in a pallisading pattern. Occasionally, vero cay bodies were seen. Less cellular areas showed scattered spindle cells. Areas of necrosis and degeneration were also seen. These features were suggestive of schwannoma (Table/Fig 5). The post operative period was uneventful. The patient was asymptomatic on 6 months follow up.


Benign nerve sheath tumours are typically divided into two groups: schwannomas and neurofibromas, of which the former are the more common. Schwannomas most frequently present in patients aged 20 to 50 years, and more frequently in men than in women. They comprise 5% of all benign soft tissue tumours and have a predilection for the head and neck and flexor surfaces of the upper and lower extremities. Deeply seated shwannomas predominate in the posterior mediastinum and retro peritoneum (2). Shwannomas are almost invariably slow growing, non - aggressive neoplasms, and they are solitary in the vast majority of cases; 5% to 18% of tumours are associated with the neurofibromatosis type(3). in which case lesions may be multiple, and often plexiform. Malignant transformation is very rare.

On gross appearance, schwannomas are usually solitary, well circumscribed, encapsulated tumours, which frequently undergo cystic degeneration. Histologically, typical schwannomas are composed of inter mixed Antoni A components (cellular and arranged in short bundles or interlacing fascicles) and Antoni B areas (less cellular and organized with more myxoid components). The cellular variant, which includes most large retroperitoneal and pelvic shwannomas, has a uniform spindle cell appearance without Antoni A or B areas. Characteristically, all Schwannomas show uniform and intense staining for S 100 protein (4).

The common pathological variants of schwannoma are :(a) Conventional schwannoma, which is a histologically benign tumour, which on occasions, causes destruction of surrounding osseous structures. (b) Ancient schwannoma, whih is a variant of schwannoma, displaying prominent degenerative changes like cyst formation, calcification, haemorrhage and hyalinization. These are large tumours which are usually deeply located (e.g. retroperitoneum). These tumours behave as ordinary schwannomas. (c) Cellular schwannoma, which is usually found in the deeper tissues (retroperitoneum or mediastinum). Histologically, it simulates malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour (MPNST). There are compact spindle shaped cells arranged in a fascicular or whorled growth pattern. Verocay bodies and Antoni B areas are not conspicuous. Mitotic figures are present. The thick fibrous capsule around the tumour shows a dense lymphocyte infiltrate. Desmin is negative. (d) Plexiform schwannoma, which particularly in cellular form, and when occurring in childhood, simulates MPNST, and, (e) Melanotic schwannoma, which is a rare variant, and usually occurs in middle aged adults and commonly arises from the posterior spinal nerve roots. They are well circumscribed, partly encapsulated lesions, characterized by polygonal and vesicular cells with grooved nuclei. These cells contain abundant melanin pigment. Hence, it is often mistaken for melanoma. Less common variants are epitheloid schwannoma, glandular schwannoma, neuroblastoma–like schwannoma and schwannoma-perineurioma(5),(6).

Schwannomas are often found incidentally, or present with vague, non specific symptoms. Schwannomas can rarely be almost entirely cystic, in which case they may resemble benign entities such as retroperitoneal pseudocyst, abscess or lymphocele. When Schwannomas are mostly solid, the differential diagnosis includes neurofibroma and lymphoma. The latter can be distinguished by the presence of separate lymphadenopathy (2). The retro peritoneum is non-restrictive, so that benign tumours are often able to grow to a large size by displacing adjacent structures before causing symptoms. They can occasionally cause bony changes in the spine, but otherwise do not invade or obstruct adjacent structures.

Malignant schwannomas are large in size and highly aggressive tumours. They are painful, and may cause many different symptoms depending on the location and size. They infiltrate into the adjacent structures and metastasize to distant sites. Histologically, the nuclear palisading may be a striking feature. There will be perineural and intraneural spread of tumour, lesional proliferation, or herniation into the lumina of the vessels. A combination of clinical, pathological and immunohistochemial studies help in the diagnosis of MPNST (7).

Nakashima et al (7), in an analysis of 25 cases of retroperitoneal tumours, found a significant correlation between irregular margins and malignancy. Other features that distinguish sarcomas from schwannomas, are invasion of local structures, distant metastases and brightly enhancing nodular areas of highly cellular tumuor. Well differentiated liposarcomas may also be characterized by the presence of fat. Hughes MJ et al (2), in their largest radiological series of abdominal or pelvic schwannomas, showed that a smooth well defined border, ovoid or spherical shape and location in the pre sacral region or lower retro peritoneum at the pelvic brim, are frequent findings in primary abdominal or pelvic schwannomas ; 11 of 13 cases showed all these features. Evidence of degeneration was common, with 8 schwannomas showing cystic change and 3 showing areas of calcification. The cystic schwannomas tended to be larger, with a mean diameter of 10.5 cm. Qiang Li et al (8), in an analysis of 82 cases of retroperitoneal schwannomas, found 81 cases (98.8%) of benign schwannoma and 1 case (1.2%) of malignant schwannoma. They concluded that most retroperitoneal schwannomas are benign. It is difficult to make an accurate pre operative diagnosis. However, with pre operative assessment of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, the accuracy of the diagnosis could be improved. The treatment depends solely on surgery. Malignant schwannomas are insensitive to chemotherapy and radiation, resulting in poor prognosis.


We report this patient with retroperitoneal / pelvic schwannoma because of its giant size, rare location, vague urinary symptoms and diagnostic dilemma.


. Song JY, Kim SY, Park EG, Kim CJ, Kim do G, Lee HK, Park IY. Schwannoma in the retroperitoneum. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2007 Jun ; 33 (3) : 371-5.
. Hughes MJ, Thomas JM, Fisher C, Moskovic EC. Imaging features of retroperitoneal and pelvic schwannomas. Clin Radiol 2005 Aug; 60 (8) : 886-93.
. J. Antiheimo, R. Sankila, O. Carpen, E. Pukkula, M. Sainio and J. Jaakelainen. Population based analysis of sporadic and type 2 neurofibromatosis associated meningiomas & schwannomas. Neurology 2000; 54: 71-6.
. S.W. Weiss and J.R. Goldblum. Benign tumours of peripheral nerves. In: S.W. Weiss and J.R. Goldblum. Editors, Enzinger & Weiss’s soft tissue tumours. Mosby, Messouri, USA (2001) :1146-68.
. Kurtkaya-Yapicier O, Scheithauer B, Woodruff JM. The pathological spectrum of Schwannomas. Histol Histopath 2003; 18(3):925-34.
. Saad AG, Mutema GK, Mutasim DR. Benign cutaneous epitheloid schwannoma: Case report and review of literature. Am J Dermatopathol 2005;27(1):45-7.
. J. Nakashima, M. Ueno, K. Nakamura, M. Tachibana, S. Baba and N. Deguchi. Differential diagnosis of primary benign and malignant retroperitoneal tumours. Int J Urol 1997; 4: 441-46.
. Qiang Li, Chuntao Gao, Jonathan T, Juzi; Xishan Hao. Analysis of 82 cases of retroperitoneal schwannoma. ANZ Journal of surgery 2007; 77 (4); 237-40.

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)