Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 298937

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2024 | Month : August | Volume : 18 | Issue : 8 | Page : UD15 - UD17 Full Version

The Profile of Cypermethrin Intoxication as Differential Diagnosis of Organophosphate Poisoning: A Case Report


Published: August 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70085.19786
Ananta Kumar Bora, Amrit Jyoti Sonowal, Ananya Barman, Sneha Gang

1. Chief Consultant, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, GNRC Medical, North Guwahati, Assam, India. 2. Consultant, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, GNRC Medical, North Guwahati, Assam, India. 3. Senior Research Associate, Department of Research and Analytics, GNRC Hospital, Dispur, Guwahati, Assam, India. 4. Senior Research Associate, Department of Research and Analytics, GNRC Hospital, Dispur, Guwahati, Assam, India.

Correspondence Address :
Sneha Gang,
GNRC Hospitals, Super Market, Dispur, Guwahati-781006, Assam, India.
E-mail: drsneha.gang@gnrchospitals.com

Abstract

Cypermethrin, a type II pyrethroid, is easily available over the counter, increasing the possibility of accidental and intentional exposures. Severe Cypermethrin exposure is rare but may lead to an organophosphate-like toxidrome, posing a diagnostic quandary to the critical care personnel. The authors present a case of a 25-year-old lady patient, who intentionally ingested a toxin or poison. On repeated investigation by medical personnel and family members, it eventually turned out to be cyperhit. On, immediate shifting to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) following acute poisoning, her vital signs were more or less stable, but with mouth filled with copious mouth secretions and mild bronchorrhoea. An intravenous dose of 1.2 mg of atropine sulfate was administered because of bronchorrhoea, which led to satisfactory improvement, except for hypoglycaemia {(Random Blood Sugar (RBS): 67 mg/dL}. To address hypoglycaemia, an initial bolus of 25% dextrose (IV)/100 mL was injected followed by an infusion of 25% dextrose at a rate of 10 ml/hr. At the end of three days of close monitoring and psychiatric counseling sessions, she was fully alert, oriented, afebrile, and had stable vital signs. The present case suggests that Cypermethrin poisoning should be considered a differential diagnosis of patients presenting with classical features of organophosphorus poisoning. Inadvertent administration of pralidoxime and atropine can be avoided if emergency physicians are aware of this entity. Optimum Atropine administration is useful when the dose is adjusted as per the patient’s response.

Keywords

Hypoglycaemia, Pyrethroid, Toxin

Case Report

A 25-year-old married female presented to our Emergency Department (ED) with an alleged history of intentionally ingesting some illicit/non-illicit substance of unknown nature. In rural areas of Asian countries, most suicides by consuming poison involve the use of pesticides, such as organophosphates and carbamates. With this mindset the initial urgent treatment was initiated. On subsequent interrogation, it gradually evolved that the patient ingested cyperhit 10% EC (cypermethrin) solution in a concentration that could not be quantified by her relatives. Initially, her family did not to take her to the hospital and decided to observe her at home. Two hours later, she was hurried to the ED of our hospital’s ED after several episodes of vomiting and slow rise in abdominal pain at her residence. The patient and her relatives denied any history of other co-morbidities. Upon arrival at the ED, her soiled clothing was removed, and she underwent superficial decontamination by cleaning her skin thoroughly with soap and water. After initial assessment, she was advised admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) following acute poisoning. In rural areas of Asian countries, most suicides by consuming poison consumption typically involve the use of pesticides, such as organophosphates and carbamates. Therefore, urgent treatment was initiated On subsequent interrogation, it gradually evolved that the patient had ingested a concentration of cypermethrin (Cyperhit 10% EC solution) that could not be quantified by her relatives.

During the general physical examination in the ICU, her Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 11 out of 15 (E4V3M4), indicating slight muscle weakness in the limbs. Her right pupil was slightly constricted for the right eye but the left eye was mildly dilated. She was otherwise a healthy mother to a kid with no previous history of suicidal ideations. in the past. Her mouth was filled with copious mouth secretions and mild bronchorrhea. There were no complaints of chest pain, palpitations, seizures, bowel or bladder incontinence, or shortness of breath at the time of admission to the hospital. Her vital signs were stable, with a blood pressure of 100/60 mmHg, oxygen saturation of 96% on room air, a Respiration Rate (RR) of 22 breaths per minute, and an axillary temperature of 98 degrees Fahrenheit. Her random blood sugar level was 98 mg/dL. Neurological and overall physical examinations revealed fairly unremarkable findings. Chest radiography showed clear lung fields. Initial tests, including liver and renal function, serum sodium, potassium, calcium, coagulation profile, arterial blood gas analysis, haemogram, and serum cholinesterase level, were within normal ranges. A 12-lead electrocardiogram done at the time of arrival showed normal results. Urine output was satisfactory and monitored regularly along with other vital signs. She was finally diagnosed with acute Cypermethrin poisoning (suicidal) and an adjustment disorder.

Treatment

After the patient was shifted to the ICU for further treatment, her condition, treatment options, cost issues, risks/benefits, the necessity of ICU care, and prognosis were disclosed and discussed in detail with her family members. Based on the detailed history and clinical evaluation, a working diagnosis of ‘Acute Cypermethrin poisoning (suicidal)’ was made and accordingly, the treatment was started.

Due to delayed hospital presentation and to prevent aspiration, the medical team refrained from administering activated charcoal therapy as well as gastric lavage. An intravenous dose of 1.2 mg of atropine sulfate was administered in view of bronchorrhoea, which eventually resulted in satisfactory improvement. Following this, her heart rate increased to 86 beats per minute however, it gradually decreased to 70 beats per minute within half an hour. After two hours, one more dose of intravenous 0.6 mg of atropine sulfate was administered two encounter bronchorrhoea. During 48 hours of close monitoring, she was treated with i.v. hydration, prophylactic broad-spectrum antibiotics (Amoxicillin and Potassium Clavulanate), Injection Proton Pump Inhibitor (Inj. PPI) (Pantoprazole), intravenous anti-emetics (Ondansetron), multivitamins, aerosol therapy (Ipratropium bromide and Levosulbutanol Respules), anti-psychotic drugs (Escitalopram Oxalate, Clonazepam, and Tofisopam), along with chest physiotherapy, and bowel and bladder care as supportive care. These interventions helped maintain stable vital signs, except for hypoglycaemia (RBS: 67 mg/dL). An initial bolus by an intravenous 25% Dextrose in 100 mL was given. The random blood sugar level was rechecked using a glucometer after 10 minutes and was found to be 72 mg/dL.

To address her persisting drowsiness, it was decided to initiate an infusion of 25% Dextrose @1 0 mL/Hr. Initially, every 30 mins the RBS was checked using Glucometer which continued on a two hours for the next 24 hours. Eventually, she reflected clinical signs of medical improvement and was transitioned to D5 saline. In the meantime, several episodes of neuro-psychiatric as well as clinical psychology counseling were conducted. At the end of three days of close monitoring, she was alert, oriented, afebrile, with stable vital signs. A cross-consultation was carried out with the neuro-psychiatry and clinical psychology department for further evaluation. Following their advice, she was discharged in improved condition and a list of medications included, Amoxicillin and Potassium Clavulanate; Ambroxol, Levosalbutamol, and Guaifenesin; Montelukast and Fexofenadine Hydrochloride; Sucral suspension; and Escitalopram oxalate. She was advised to have restful life for atleast seven days. During a follow-up appointment in the outpatient department the following week, she remained asymptomatic and was doing well.

Discussion

According to the chemical structure and toxidromes, Pyrethroids are classified into two types: Type I (allethrin, permethrin) with a cyclopropane carboxylic acid structure, and Type II (cypermethrin, deltamethrin) which have an alpha-cyano group attached (1),(2). The World Health Organisation (WHO) has categorised cypermethrin as a moderately hazardous pesticide with a high toxic potential of LD50 250 mg/kg and an oral toxic dose range from 100-1000 mg/kg body weight (3). Cypermethrin is often used in the form of a miraculous chalk stick (locally known as Lakshman Rekha), liquid, or powder to rinse off kitchen insects. Cypermethrin shows a complex mechanism of action by modifying the voltage-gated sodium channels and thereby delaying their closure. Moreover, the toxic properties of cypermethrin are also attributed to the voltage-gated calcium channels and gamma-aminobutyric acid-mediated chloride channels (4). Though, mammals are less susceptible to it due to their large body size, poor dermal absorption, higher body temperature, and hence metabolising and excrete it more rapidly (5). The goals of immediate treatment for the poisoned patient can be divided into six phases: (a) stabilisation; (b) laboratory assessment; (c) decontamination of the gastrointestinal tract, skin, or eyes; (d) administration of an antidote; (e) enhancement of toxin elimination; and (f) observation and disposition (6). In this case, the systematic approach to treatment was achieved and the initial symptoms of vomiting and mild abdominal pain were resolved within a few hours.

Hypoglycaemia due to cypermethrin poisoning is a rare occurrence (7). In a study consisting of 104 patients with Type II pyrethroid poisoning, hyperglycemia has been reported as one of the prominent adverse outcome, which can be attributed to the increase in adrenergic activity (7). The rare condition of hypoglycemia in our case was beautifully taken care of by evaluating random blood sugar levels at a break of every 30 mins and accordingly IV infusion of Dextrose 25% in normal saline. While WHO recommends symptomatic and supportive measures with no specific antidotes for this type of poisoning (8), the UK National Poison Information Service suggested using atropine for managing increased salivation in deltamethrin poisoning (9). Atropine, an anticholinergic medication that functions as a muscarinic receptor-blocking agent and serves as a physiological antidote to cypermethrin poisoning, was administered in a dose-adjusted manner based on the patient’s response (10). Pralidoxime chloride (2-PAM) was used with atropine in the treatment to relieve nicotinic signs such as tremors and muscle weakness. The mechanism of action of 2-PAM is to reactivate the acetylcholinesterase enzyme (AChE) that has been deactivated by the poison. Intravenous supplementation of magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) i.v. supplementation was also given in association with atropine to address the patient’s serum hypomagnesemia, as it helps inhibit acetylcholine release from motor nerve terminals, antagonising the effects of the poisoning (11), hence reducing patient mortality and hospitalisation duration. days of the patients. A diagnosis is a medical diagnostic technique used in medicine that separates one disease or condition from others that have comparable clinical symptoms. Proficient healthcare professionals employ an evidence-based methodology, enhancing their clinical expertise with insights from clinical research when creating a differential diagnosis. The present case of self-poisoning could be dealt successfully with no major complications as cypermethrin poisoning was taken as the differential diagnosis of potential organophosphorus poisoning.

Conclusion

In summary, physicians working in the Emergency Department (ED) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) should be attentive to Cypermethrin poisoning cases and consider it as a potential differential diagnosis in patients exhibiting classical features of Organophosphorus poisoning. The inadvertent administration of pralidoxime and atropine can be avoided if emergency physicians are aware of this entity. The authors found the administration useful when the dosage was adjusted as per the patient’s response. Though overall prospects of Cypermethrin poisoning, with its severe symptoms and lack of a specific antidote, show excellent results with conservative therapy, there is less availability of data detailing cypermethrin toxicity in humans. This makes it evident to report more cases which will eventually help in optimising the mechanisms and treatment therapies of severe poisoning.

References

1.
Bradberry SM, Cage SA, Proudfoot AT, Vale JA. Poisoning due to pyrethroids. Toxicol Rev. 2005;24(2):93-106. Doi: 10.2165/00139709-200524020-00003. [crossref]
2.
Shilpakar O, Karki B. Cypermethrin poisoning manifesting with prolonged bradycardia: A case report. Toxicol Rep. 2020;8:10-12. Published 2020 Dec 10. Doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.12.005. [crossref]
3.
World Health Organization. vol. 82. United Nations Environmental Programme, the International Labour Organization, and the World Health Organization; Geneva: 1989. Environmental health criteria. (Cypermethrin). Available from: https://iris.who.int/handle/10665/38082.
4.
Hassouna I. Transplacental neurotoxicity of cypermethrin induced astrogliosis, microgliosis and depletion of let-7 miRNAs expression in the developing rat cerebral cortex. Toxicol Rep. 2020;7:1608-15. Doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2020.11.007. [crossref]
5.
Tiwari RK, Singh S, Pandey RS. Assessment of acute toxicity and biochemical responses to chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin and their combination exposed earthworm, Eudrilus eugeniae. Toxicol Rep. 2019;6:288-97. Doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2019.03.007. [crossref]
6.
Emergency management of poisoning. Haddad and Winchester’s clinical management of poisoning and drug overdose. 2007;13-61. Doi: 10.1016/B978-0-7216-0693-4.50007-4. [crossref]
7.
Kim D, Moon J, Chun B. The initial hyperglycemia in acute type II pyrethroid poisoning. J Korean Med Sci. 2015;30(4):365-70. Doi: 10.3346/jkms.2015.30.4.365. [crossref]
8.
World Health Organization. World health report 2002 reducing risk, promoting healthy life. Geneva: WHO, 2002. Doi: 10.1080/1357628031000116808.[crossref]
9.
Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, Zwi AB, Lozano R, eds. World report on violence and health. Geneva: WHO, 2002. Doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0. [crossref]
10.
McLendon K, Preuss CV. Atropine. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan [June 23, 2023]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih. gov/books/NBK470551/.
11.
Pajoumand A, Shadnia S, Rezaie A, Abdi M, Abdollahi M. Benefits of magnesium sulfate in the management of acute human poisoning by organophosphorus insecticides. Human and Experimental Toxicology. 2004;23(12):565-69. Doi: 10.1191/0960327104ht489oa.[crossref]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70085.19786

Date of Submission: Feb 16, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Apr 06, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 19, 2024
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 17, 2024
• Manual Googling: Apr 10, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 18, 2024 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 10

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com