Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 33675

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : SC11 - SC14 Full Version

Clinical Spectrum of Aspergillosis in Children with Severe Asthma: A Retrospective Observational Study


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67492.19285
Payal Agrawal, Nidhi Bedi, Pankaj Abrol, Neha Gupta, Kirtika Balhara

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGT Medical College, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 2. Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGT Medical College, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 3. Head, Department of Paediatrics, SGT Medical College, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 4. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Paediatrics, SGT Medical College, Gurugram, Haryana, India. 5. Postgraduate Resident, Department of Paediatrics, SGT Medical College, Gurugram, Haryana, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Payal Agrawal,
Assistant Professor, Department of Paediatrics, SGT Medical College, Gurugram-122505, Haryana, India.
E-mail: p.agrawal7610@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Aspergillus species can affect the respiratory system of genetically predisposed asthma patients. Allergic Broncho-Pulmonary Aspergillosis (ABPA) is one of the manifestations of aspergillosis. Most research on ABPA has been conducted in the adult population, with very few studies including paediatric patients.

Aim: To examine the clinical spectrum of aspergillosis in severely asthmatic children aged between 2 and 18 years admitted to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).

Materials and Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted from September 2021 to August 2022. Out of 76 children aged between 2 and 18 years who presented with asthma over one year, 24 children fulfilling the inclusion criteria (severe asthma requiring PICU admission) were included in the study by convenient sampling. Children were diagnosed with ABPA and Severe Asthma with Fungal Sensitisation (SAFS) based on the ISHAM (International Society for Human and Animal Mycology) work group criteria (history of asthma, raised Aspergillus-specific and total Immunoglobulin E (IgE), presence of Aspergillus-specific IgG, eosinophilia, and positive radiological findings). Descriptive statistics elaborated in the form of mean and standard deviation.

Results: A total of 24 patients with acute severe asthma were admitted to the PICU over one year. Nearly 60% (15/24) of the patients fulfilled the criteria for subgroup A (comprising poorly controlled asthma, eosinophilia, or positive radiological findings). Among them, six (25%) patients had total serum IgE levels > 1000 IU/mL, three (12.5%) had levels between 500-1000 IU/mL, and six (25%) had levels <500 IU/mL. Among these patients, 60% (9/15) had elevated Aspergillus-specific IgE and IgG levels. As per the ISHAM work group criteria, 6/24 (25%) patients were diagnosed with S-ABPA (Serological ABPA) and 3/24 (12.5%) patients were diagnosed with SAFS.

Conclusion: Aspergillus sensitivity is increasingly being detected in asthmatic children, requiring further work-up, especially in patients with poorly controlled asthma.

Keywords

Aspergillus sensitivity, Bronchopulmonary disease, Respiratory infection

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the respiratory tract that manifests as coughing, wheezing, shortness of breath, and chest tightness. Its onset is heterogeneous with various phenotypes like allergic, non allergic, late-onset, obesity-related, and asthma with persistent airflow limitation (1). Dust, house mites, pollens, animal dander, and fungal moulds are some of the well known risk factors for allergic asthma (2). The Aspergillus species is commonly associated with fungi and affects the respiratory tract of genetically susceptible individuals (3). The clinical spectrum includes allergic manifestations, saprophytic colonisation of the respiratory tract, and invasive aspergillosis (4). Allergic aspergillosis may manifest as Allergic Sinusitis (AAS), ABPA, or Aspergillus-Induced Asthma (AIA) (4). ABPA is a known clinical entity in adults, but paediatric data is limited (5). These patients may present with poorly controlled asthma not responding to conventional asthma medications, along with Aspergillus sensitivity and radiological changes (5). The clinical and radiological manifestations differ from case to case. There is no single definitive test to diagnose this clinical entity (6). In 1977, Rosenberg M et al., proposed diagnostic criteria for the same, which were used until the ISHAM work group provided a simplified criterion in 2013 (7),(8). SAFS, a new subgroup of asthma, has recently been described (9). It is characterised by fungal sensitisation with little or no colonisation. This subset of asthma patients represents the transition phase between asthma and ABPA. Patients with SAFS may go on to develop ABPA because of progressively increasing Th2 immune response (10).

A systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated that the prevalence of Aspergillus Sensitisation (AS) in bronchial asthma ranges from 15-48%, with a pooled prevalence of 28% (95% CI, 24%-34%) (11). A similar frequency of AS has been documented in recently published studies as well (12),(13). Most of the available data is based on studies done in adult patients (11),(12),(13), with only a few studies including paediatric patients (4),(14). Also, no diagnostic criteria have been specifically defined for paediatric patients to date. Hence, present study was planned in view of insufficient paediatric data.

Hence, the present study was conducted to study the clinical spectrum of aspergillosis in severely asthmatic children aged between 2 and 18 years who were admitted to the PICU and to classify severely asthmatic Aspergillus-sensitive children into various categories of Aspergillus manifestations.

Material and Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted in the Department of Paediatrics at Shree Guru Gobind Singh Tricentenary Medical College, Hospital, and Research Institute, located in Gurugram, Haryana, India. It is a tertiary-level healthcare facility located at outskirts of Gurugram and mainly serves the nearby rural population. All the case records during one-year period (September 2021-August 2022) were enrolled after taking ethical approval from the hospital’s ethical committee (IEC/FMHS/F/18/8/23/96). Data collection and analysis of case records were conducted from July 2023 to August 2023.

Inclusion criteria: Paediatric patients aged 2-18 years who were admitted to the PICU with acute exacerbation of asthma within the study duration were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients who were taking oral steroids already at presentation or who were previously taking steroids and stopped them less than three months ago, or had underlying congenital disorders or anomalies, were excluded from the study.

Sample size: Sampling was done by convenience sampling. Children aged 2-18 years presenting with a diagnosis of asthma were observed. Those with mild to moderate exacerbation of asthma were admitted to the paediatric ward and received treatment as per the standard protocols. Children with severe exacerbation or poorly controlled asthma who were admitted to the PICU were enrolled in the study.

Data collection: Baseline characteristics of these patients were recorded, including age, gender, clinical findings, presence of any co-morbidity, drug history, number of acute exacerbations per year, anthropometric parameters, and whether diagnosed with controlled, partially controlled, or poorly controlled asthma (as per Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines) (1).

Patients with poorly controlled asthma or blood eosinophilia (>500 cells/μL) and positive radiological findings were categorised as subgroup A and further evaluated for evidence of aspergillosis. These patients were screened for aspergillosis using serum total Immunoglobulin (Ig)E (>1000 IU/mL), Aspergillus-specific IgE/IgG, chest X-ray findings, and chest Computed Tomography (CT) findings, if available. Patients with positive results for aspergillosis were categorised as ABPA (as per ISHAM workgroup criteria) or SAFS (as per the diagnostic criteria proposed by Denning DW et al.) [8,15].

The ISHAM workgroup criteria for ABPA are as follows: A) Predisposing conditions: 1) Bronchial asthma; 2) Cystic fibrosis. B) Criteria: a) Obligatory (both should be present): 1) Positive Type-I Aspergillus skin test (immediate cutaneous hypersensitivity reaction) or raised Aspergillus-specific IgE levels (>0.35 kUA/L); 2) Elevated total serum IgE levels (>1,000 IU/mL). b) Other criteria (at least two of three): 1) Presence of Aspergillus-specific IgG antibodies; 2) Radiographic findings consistent with ABPA; 3) Absolute eosinophil count >500 cells/μL (8). Radiographic findings suggestive of aspergillosis include fleeting opacities, tramline sign (parallel lines), ring shadows, High Attenuation Mucous (HAM), gloved finger or wine glass appearance on plain chest X-ray. Additionally, CT may show evidence of central bronchiectasis, bronchial wall thickening, occluded bronchi, and air-fluid levels (16).

The diagnostic criteria for SAFS include: 1) Poorly controlled asthma with frequent asthma exacerbations; 2) Positive fungi-specific skin prick test (not necessarily specific to Aspergillus species) or presence of antifungal IgE (> 0.4 kU/L); 3) Total serum IgE <1,000 IU/mL. SAFS patients do not exhibit mucoid impaction or bronchiectasis (15).

Statistical Analysis

Data was entered into a Microsoft Excel sheet and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. Descriptive statistics elaborated in the form of mean and standard deviation.

Results

During the defined one-year study period, 76 patients presented with asthma to the paediatric department, during the defined one-year time, 76 asthmatic patients presented to paediatric unit either through Outpatient Department (OPD) or admitted through emergency department. Among them, 49 (64.5%) were male and 27 (35.5%) were female, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 1.8:1. Out of the 76 patients, 17 (22.4%) presented in the OPD with clinical signs and symptoms of asthma and were managed as per standard guidelines. A total of 35 (46.1%) were admitted to the paediatric ward with mild to moderate exacerbations of asthma. They responded well to standard treatment for asthma exacerbation. Additionally, 24 (31.5%) patients were admitted to the PICU with severe asthma exacerbations and received treatment for the same. These 24 patients were enrolled in the study.

The mean age of the study participants was 9.55±3.87 years with a male predilection (2.4:1). Among all 24 study participants, 6 out of 24 (25%) had more than three exacerbations per year, thereby labeled as poorly controlled asthma, while 18 out of 24 (75%) patients were well controlled on their medications. Most of the children were on low-dose steroids with short-acting beta-agonists. The total duration of medications was variable, ranging from three months to two years among study participants at the time of presentation (Table/Fig 1).

All patients were screened for eosinophil counts and radiological findings. Out of the total 24 study patients, 13 (54.16%) patients had only eosinophilia, one (4.16%) patient had positive chest X-ray findings (Table/Fig 2), while one (4.16%) patient had both eosinophilia and positive chest X-ray findings. A total of 15 out of 24 (62.5%) patients fulfilled the subcategory criteria (categorised as subgroup A) and were further assessed for biochemical evidence of Aspergillus sensitivity. Patients with serum total IgE levels >500 IU/mL (9 out of 15; 60%) were further tested for Aspergillus-specific antibody levels and all were found to be positive for Aspergillus-specific IgE and IgG (Table/Fig 3).

Out of the 15 patients in subgroup A, 6 out of 15 (40%) children met the ISHAM workgroup criteria for ABPA and were diagnosed accordingly. Since none of them had any CT findings consistent with CB-ABPA, they were diagnosed with S-ABPA (6 out of 24; 25%) (Table/Fig 4).

Three out of 15 patients with serum total IgE levels between 500-1000 IU/mL did not meet the criteria for ABPA (as per ISHAM working group), but all three were positive for Aspergillus sensitivity along with a history of recurrent episodes of asthma exacerbations severe enough to be classified as poorly controlled asthma as per GINA guidelines (1). These three patients (3 out of 24; 12.5%) were diagnosed with SAFS (severe asthma with Aspergillus sensitivity) (Table/Fig 5).

Discussion

The prevalence of aspergillosis is well-defined in cystic fibrosis patients, but it can also affect asthmatic patients in many ways. The spectrum of clinical manifestations varies from allergic symptoms to invasive aspergillosis. Genetically susceptible individuals are more prone to acquire it (17). The inhaled spores germinate into hyphae within the respiratory tract. These fungal hyphae release various antigens that alter the mucociliary system and breach the respiratory epithelial barrier. They provoke the innate immune system, resulting in hypersensitivity reactions (18). IgE mediated hypersensitivity reaction is responsible for the majority of the pathogenesis, but IgG-mediated Type-III and cell-mediated Type-IV reactions are also contributory. These reactions lead to a storm of cytokines and chemokines, along with an influx of inflammatory cells. Additionally, these antigens get processed by the antigen-presenting cells and elicit a T-helper cell 2 (Th2) CD4+ T cell response. All these inflammatory reactions result in eosinophilic lung infiltrates, raised total and Aspergillus-specific IgE levels, and airway hyper-responsiveness. Upon repeated exposure, permanent tissue damage and airway remodeling occur (18).

Pathologic changes correspond to the extent of airway remodeling and the stage of ABPA. The disease is divided into five stages: acute, remission, exacerbation, steroid-dependent, and end-stage (fibrotic) ABPA (19). These stages occur over the years in an individual and are well-defined in adult patients, but the data is not available for paediatric patients. Clinically, patients may present with signs and symptoms mimicking asthma exacerbations or with severe pulmonary dysfunction or respiratory failure (19). Present study retrospectively reviewed 24 paediatric patients presenting with acute severe asthma at a tertiary healthcare centre over one year. In present study it was found that 6 out of the total 24 asthmatic patients (25%) fulfilled the ISHAM workgroup criteria for S-ABPA. Additionally, three asthmatic patients (12.5%) meeting the criteria for SAFS were identified.

The prevalence of AS among adult patients with asthma ranged from 5.5 to 38.5%, and the prevalence of ABPA in asthma varied between 2.5 and 22.3%, with a pooled prevalence of 8.4% (8). Only a few case reports and two recently published studies have provided data for the Indian paediatric population. The first Indian paediatric case report was published by Chetty A et al., in 1982, who further studied the incidence of aspergillosis in 107 Indian paediatric patients with perennial asthma, reported 15% cases of ABPA (5). Banerjee B et al., reported a case series of 10 paediatric patients aged 5-13 years. They found raised serum total IgE and positive Aspergillus-specific IgE/IgG in these asthmatic patients and diagnosed them with ABPA (20).

Recently, a prospective study was done by Singh M et al., in which they included 100 children aged 5-15 years with poorly controlled asthma and reported an incidence of 26% for ABPA (14). In a retrospective study by Shah A and Kunal S, a total of 349 patients of all ages were diagnosed with ABPA over 31 years (1985-2016) in their pulmonary unit, with 42 patients in the paediatric age group (3.5-18 years). In their retrospective study of 42 paediatric patients with ABPA, they highlighted the importance of evaluating asthmatic children for ABPA (5). The findings of both of these studies are compared with our study and shown in (Table/Fig 6).

The diagnosis of ABPA depends on clinical, laboratory, and radiological parameters. Laboratory tests include total and Aspergillus-specific serological tests. Raised serum Aspergillus-specific IgE and IgG levels are consistent with the diagnosis of ABPA. Moreover, absolute eosinophil counts and positive Aspergillus skin tests contribute to the diagnosis. Asthmatic patients with fungal sensitisation can be categorised into four clinical categories: Asthma Associated with Fungal Sensitisation (AAFS), SAFS, serologic ABPA (ABPA S), and central bronchiectasis ABPA (ABPA CB) (10).

The asthmatic patients with mild to moderate asthma, positive fungal skin test (or elevated specific IgE), and total IgE <1000 IU/L are labeled as AAFS, while those with severe asthma, evidence of fungal sensitisation, and total IgE <1000 IU/L are labeled as SAFS (10). Asthmatic patients with evidence of fungal sensitisation and total IgE >1000 IU/mL are categorised into serologic ABPA (without radiological findings), ABPA-CB (with central bronchiectasis), and ABPA-CB-HAM (with central bronchiectasis and HAM) (21). The radiological findings of ABPA vary from non specific pulmonary infiltrates, parallel lines (tram lines), ring shadows to consolidation and fibrosis. The most common finding is fleeting lung opacities on chest X-ray. The CT finding of central bronchiectasis is considered pathognomonic for ABPA (16). HAM plugs have also recently been added as a characteristic CT finding of ABPA (4). Regular monitoring with pulmonary function tests helps assess the severity and stage of the disease but does not have any diagnostic value.

In present study, six cases (25%) were identified of S-ABPA and three cases (12.5%) of SAFS based on the criteria given by the ISHAM workgroup in 2013. The cut-off for serum total IgE was set at more than 1000 IU/mL as suggested by the ISHAM workgroup. Singh M et al., proposed a new cut-off of more than 1200 IU/mL with 88.5% sensitivity and 70.5% specificity (14). All six of the S-ABPA cases also fulfilling this new cut-off value, with a mean serum total IgE of 2181.5±692.44 IU/mL. The category of AAFS was not evaluated in present study but is planned for a prospective trial. Aspergillus-specific IgE antibody levels of >0.35 kUA/L are considered diagnostic for ABPA. In present study, all 9 out of 9 patients (6 with ABPA and 3 with SAFS) tested positive for Aspergillus-specific IgE and also had elevated Aspergillus-specific IgG antibodies. In present study, only two cases (8.33%) with positive radiological findings in the form of fleeting lung opacities were found, who were further evaluated with CT imaging.

Limitation(s)

The facility for a chest CT scan is available in-house, but the patients belonged to the poor rural population of peripheral Gurugram and could not afford the cost of a CT scan. Hence, all suspected ABPA could not undergo, limiting the study in terms of radiological evidence for ABPA. Another limitation of present study was the small sample size, as it was a time-lined retrospective study. However, a high sensitivity to aspergillosis was noted, which warrants further evaluation through a planned prospective study. Due to financial constraints, only suspected asthmatic children were evaluated for AS.

Conclusion

Aspergillosis was found to be a prevalent disease entity that complicates the course of illness in paediatric severe asthmatic patients. Aspergillus sensitivity in these patients can lead to poorly controlled asthma, and repeated exposures can result in permanent changes in lung parenchyma. Timely recognition of symptomatology and appropriate investigations are important for better management. Moreover, well-defined diagnostic criteria for the paediatric population and knowledge about the treatment of this clinical entity are required to decrease the disease burden and improve the quality of life of affected patients.

References

1.
Reddel HK, Bacharier LB, Bateman ED, Brightling CE, Brusselle GG, Buhl R, et al. Global initiative for asthma strategy. GINA 2021: Executive summary and rationale for key changes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(1):17-35. Doi: 10.1164/rccm.202109-2205PP. PMID: 34658302; PMCID: PMC8865583. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Asthma Triggers. Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America [Internet]. Available from: https://aafa.org/asthma/asthma-triggers-causes/. Accessed on 24 October 2023.
3.
Sharma R, Deval R, Priyadarshi V, Gaur SN, Singh VP, Singh AB. Indoor fungal concentration in the homes of allergic/asthmatic children in Delhi, India. Allergy Rhinol (Providence). 2011;2(1):21-32. Doi: 10.2500/ar.2011.2.0005. PMID: 22852111; PMCID: PMC3390125. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Shah A, Panjabi C. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A perplexing clinical entity. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016;8(4):282-97. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Shah A, Kunal S. A review of 42 asthmatic children with allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Asia Pac Allergy. 2017;7(3):148-55. Doi: 10.5415/apallergy. 2017.7.3.148. Epub 2017 Jul 19. PMID: 28765819; PMCID: PMC5537079. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Patel AR, Patel AR, Singh S, Singh S, Khawaja I. Diagnosing allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: A review. Cureus. 2019;11(4):e4550. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.4550. [crossref]
7.
Rosenberg M, Patterson R, Mintzer R, Cooper BJ, Roberts M, Harris KE. Clinical and immunologic criteria for the diagnosis of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Ann Intern Med. 1977;86(4):405-14. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Agarwal R, Chakrabarti A, Shah A, Gupta D, Meis JF, Guleria R, et al. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: Review of literature and proposal of new diagnostic and classification criteria. Clin Exp Allergy. 2013;43(8):850-73. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Prasad R, Kazmi SA, Kacker R, Gupta N. Severe asthma with fungal sensitization. Indian J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021;35(1):03-07. [crossref]
10.
Agarwal R. Severe asthma with fungal sensitization. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011;11(5):403-13. Doi: 10.1007/s11882-011-0217-4. PMID: 21789577. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Agarwal R, Aggarwal AN, Gupta D, Jindal SK. Aspergillus hypersensitivity and allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in patients with bronchial asthma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Tubercul Lung Dis. 2009;13(8):936-44.
12.
Fairs A, Agbetile J, Hargadon B, Bourne M, Monteiro WR, Brightling CE, et al. IgE sensitisation to Aspergillus fumigatus is associated with reduced lung function in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(11):1362-68. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Menzies D, Holmes L, McCumesky G, Prys-Picard C, Niven R. Aspergillus sensitization is associated with airflow limitation and bronchiectasis in severe asthma. Allergy. 2011;66(5):679-85. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Singh M, Das S, Chauhan A, Paul N, Sodhi KS, Mathew J, et al. The diagnostic criteria for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis in children with poorly controlled asthma need to be re-evaluated. Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(5):e206-09. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Denning DW, O’Driscoll BR, Hogaboam CM, Bowyer P, Niven RM. The link between fungi and severe asthma: A summary of the evidence. Eur Respir J. 2006;27(3):615-26. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Shah A, Panjabi C. Allergic aspergillosis of the respiratory tract. Eur Respir Rev. 2014;23(131):08-29. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Agarwal R. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis: Lessons learnt from genetics. Indian J Chest Dis Allied Sci. 2011;53(3):137 40. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Agarwal R. Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Chest. 2009;135(3):805-26. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Jat KR, Vaidya PC, Mathew JL, Jondhale S, Singh M. Childhood allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis. Lung India. 2018;35(6):499-507. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Banerjee B, Joshi AP, Sarma PU, Roy S. Evaluation of clinico-immunological parameters in pediatric ABPA patients. Indian J Pediatr. 1992;59(1):109-14. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Agarwal R, Khan A, Gupta D, Aggarwal AN, Saxena AK, Chakrabarti A. An alternate method of classifying allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis based on high attenuation mucus. PLoS One. 2010;5:e15346.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67492.19285

Date of Submission: Sep 12, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 22, 2024
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Sep 12, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 13, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 20, 2024 (8%)

Etymology: Author Origin

Emendations: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com