Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 39021

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2024 | Month : April | Volume : 18 | Issue : 4 | Page : OE01 - OE05 Full Version

Utilising Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Diagnosis of Psychiatric Disorders: A Narrative Review


Published: April 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/61698.19249
Mansi Khare, Sourya Acharya, Samarth Shukla, Harshita, Ankita Sachdev

1. MBBS Student, Department of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 4. MBBS Student, Department of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 5. MBBS Student, Department of Medicine, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Mansi Khare,
Gayatri Hostel, Datta Meghe Institute of Medical Sciences, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: mansikhare40420@gmail.com

Abstract

In the era of machinery, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become the new tool for managing patients in psychiatry. Nowadays, many psychiatric disorders are being diagnosed and treated with the help of AI. New technologies like Machine Learning (ML), robots, Deep Learning (DL), and sensor-based systems provide a different perspective on psychiatric disorders. The present narrative review article summarised the use of AI in diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders. AI can assist a patients with a psychiatric diseases in prognosis, clinical diagnosis, management therapy, and addressing clinical and technological issues. It highlights various AI methods used in mental healthcare, with a focus on multiple ML perspectives. Additionally, AI has the potential to address several factors, including privacy, transparency, bias, and other social and ethical considerations. The aim of the present review was to redefine mental disorders more objectively, personalise treatments, facilitate early diagnosis, and provide patients with more choices in their care. Through the present article, author aimed to highlight the use of AI in the diagnosis of various psychiatric disorders such as depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), and Alzheimer’s Disease (AD).

Keywords

Bipolar, Mental, Neuroimaging, Robotics, Schizophrenia

The AI refers to the emulation of human intelligence in machines, which are designed to think like people and replicate their actions (1). AI techniques focus on actively manipulating the environment, making consensus-based decisions, utilising robotics, and employing collective intelligence techniques. AI can be categorised into several types based on the level of its system’s functionality: AI with self-awareness, limited memory, theory of mind, and reactive machines (1). The following procedures and techniques can be employed in conjunction with AI to address practical issues: (DL), robotics, expert systems, fuzzy logic, natural language processing, and (ML) (1). Mental disorders have an impact on psychological, social, behavioural, and emotional well-being (1). The variability in the presentation of diseases, signs, and symptoms, coupled with the limitations in the understanding of aetiological pathways, makes diagnosing mental disorders challenging. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) manuals serve as the foundation for current methods of diagnosing mental illnesses (1). The process of diagnosing mental problems using diagnostic instruments, interviewing family members or caregivers, and gathering health histories can be time consuming and resource intensive (2).

For supporting and enhancing the diagnostic and interventional aspects of psychiatric treatment, digital health tools and technology present excellent practices (3). Mental diseases have been diagnosed using AI. The AI is a significant and popular example of these digital technologies because it enables machines to identify complex, underlying patterns and provide practical insights by understanding queries and sifting through and connecting vast amounts of data (4). AI can significantly transform how to perceive, diagnose, and treat mental illnesses. AI can be utilised with electronic records, radiological investigations, sensor-based tracking systems, and social media to predict and categorise psychiatric disorders and issues such as suicidality (5). An increasing range of AI applications to electronic records, investigations, sensor-based tracking systems, and social media have successfully predicted and categorised mental issues like suicidality in various domains (4). By focusing on various illustrative publications, it provides insights into AI techniques in mental health care, aiming to assist with diagnosis, prognosis, management, and addressing clinical and technological issues (2),(3),(4),(6). It sheds light on how the use of AI has transformed the landscape of diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders. The advantages of using AI in psychiatry may not be immediately apparent. One concern is that individuals may be hesitant to share their personal issues and history with doctors (2). Through AI, it would be easier for patients to communicate their problems to a doctor without worrying about being judged. Machines can provide more effective treatment because they lack human factors such as distraction, stress, and fatigue (3). They are also immune to the same personal biases that can affect human therapists. AI robots can take into account a patient’s race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic background when adjusting treatment. However, AI algorithms may have drawbacks such as bias, fragility, and limited applicability outside their training domain (1).

These limitations are particularly pronounced in cases of mental health problems because these conditions require softer skills such as building rapport with patients, establishing relationships, and observing emotions and behaviour (4). Another drawback is the lack of human empathy and compassion, which are essential elements in treating patients who have experienced mental trauma or are dealing with a mental condition. AI devices must undergo the same rigorous regulatory review and risk assessment procedures as conventional medical devices before they can be approved for clinical use (5). When using AI applications, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSMs) criteria guidelines must be followed for research or clinical evidence purposes. There is a remote possibility that human-machine interactions may not translate to human-human interactions or may even further restrict human-to-human interactions (3),(4). The goal of AI is to assist people by acting as their assistants in improving the world. Their makeup should include prosocial traits such as empathy, generosity, self-awareness, and effective control, as well as the ability to accept and decisively act on differing points of view (1),(3).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Depression

Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a highly prevalent psychiatric disorder that has a significant impact on socioeconomic burden and Quality of Life (QoL). The criteria outlined in the DSM and a patient’s response to treatment are commonly used for diagnosing MDD (5). In the case of depression, (ML) techniques can generate reliable predictions of treatment outcomes (6). ML encompasses a range of models that utilise empirical data to create training models and accurately classify new input (7). Its benefits for MDD extend beyond diagnosis and include the ability to predict the future progression of the disease. Its capacity for individual-level analysis is particularly noteworthy in recent years. Research focused on depression biomarkers has seen substantial growth, particularly in using MRI in conjunction with pattern recognition methods (8),(9). These techniques can predict treatment outcomes and differentiate between individuals with depression and healthy controls with high accuracy (10),(11). Exploratory research is still predominantly focused on strategies for integrating MRI data with ML techniques. The merging of ML algorithms and MRI data in depression is gaining increasing attention due to its high potential and ability to reveal additional information about underlying brain regions. Studies have utilised genetic, Electronic Medical Record (EMR), neuroimaging, and speech data to model the progression of depression (12). Patients at risk of self-harm behaviour can be identified using demographic, social, mental, and physical health data, as well as administrative data from healthcare encounters. A history of high-risk events can predict short-term future high-lethality suicide attempts. Multimodal sensing, which includes wearables, smartphones, physiological sensors such as heart rate and electrodermal activity, as well as ambient sensors like motion, temperature, and light, enables the continuous collection of real-world data on symptoms, treatment response, behaviours, thoughts, and emotions (13),(14). If it becomes possible to continuously identify behaviours related to mental health, a new generation of highly personalised, contextualised, dynamic mobile health (mHealth) tools that can listen rather than ask and seamlessly interact, learn, and grow with users could emerge (14). Platforms such as mindLAMP (15), AWARE (16), and crosscheck (17) facilitate multimodal data collection, making continuous remote monitoring and the detection of subjective and objective signs of psychotic relapse more accessible. The urgency of reversing the trend of increasing suicide rates has led to the development of technology-based tools, such as text messaging, smartphone apps, smartphone sensors, electronic health records, and ML algorithms, which can provide crucial data to improve suicide prognosis or offer immediate support to those at risk (16). Innovative data processing, modelling, and signal detection techniques are being developed and evaluated to detect changes within individuals over time, with the aim of enhancing treatment and prevention (17),(18). This would expedite the identification of individuals at risk or in need of treatment. Additionally, a number of chatbots and applications (Table/Fig 1) (1),(2). It plays a significant role in the treatment of depression, not only providing emotional support but also addressing underlying conditions (19),(20).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Schizophrenia

Schizophrenia is a highly diverse psychiatric disorder characterised by abnormal perceptions of reality. AI has the potential to be applied in various ways to address this heterogeneity and improve predictions and understanding of the disorder’s neurological basis. New developments in functional mapping and electric field modeling can enhance the effectiveness of brain stimulation on social cognitive networks (21). Targeting specific networks using techniques like repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) can be utilised. New strategies are being developed to consider neuroanatomical diversity and optimise coil placement to maximise target engagement for each individual (21). By combining L1-norm authorised sparse canonical correlation analysis and Sparse Logistic Regression (SLR), reliable classification of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) has been achieved in rs-fMRI studies (21). The spectrum of schizophrenic disorders includes schizophrenia, schizotypal personality disorder, schizophreniform disorder, brief psychotic disorder, schizoaffective disorder, delusional disorder, and psychosis induced by substance use or medical conditions (22). The European First Episode Schizophrenia Trial (EUFEST) trial, a large multisite treatment database in Europe for first-episode schizophrenia, has provided prospective phenotypic data on mental disorders, enabling accurate prediction of treatment outcomes using effective ML techniques (23). Recent AI techniques have demonstrated that Functional Striatal Abnormalities (FSA) are strongly associated with a range of severity in the spectrum of mental disorders, with the most pronounced dysfunction observed in schizophrenia (24).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Bipolar Disorder

The ML approaches can provide physicians and researchers with crucial information for the diagnosis, personalised therapy, and prognostic guidance for patients with bipolar disorder due to the clinical heterogeneity of samples. By utilising multivariate techniques and ML, available data can be considered simultaneously. Furthermore, ML-generated outcome biomarkers can help determine the type and level of care required by the patient immediately. Supervised ML, based on neuroimaging data from previous responders and non responders, may be able to predict the success of a therapy and aid in selecting the best course of action (25). In high-risk cases, ML could assist in predicting the transition to full-blown bipolar disorder (26). Identifying those at greatest risk of bipolar disorder would enable the application of targeted preventive interventions. AI focuses on genetic data, cognitive or clinical measures, peripheral biomarkers, electrophysiological techniques, and multimodal strategies for diagnosing bipolar disorder. Various markers and ML algorithms achieve accurate categorisation of bipolar disorder. With the help of ML, bipolar disorder can be accurately distinguished from other mental illnesses. However, further research is needed to establish the best practices in this approach (25),(26),(27).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Autism Spectrum Disease

The results of rs-fMRI studies have demonstrated a valid neuroimaging-based classifier for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) that shows the spatial distribution of the 16 Fragment Crystallisable (FCs) found in the data at various locations, as agreed upon by machine learning algorithms. Additionally, genome-level investigations have revealed a significant level of polygenic risk for ASD in relation to schizophrenia, but not in relation to Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) (26),(27),(28). Clinical and behavioural investigations provide growing evidence of a connection between ASD and schizophrenia (28). AI has been extensively utilised to explore ASD, with the ultimate goal of streamlining and expediting the diagnostic process and enabling early access to therapy (28). ML shows potential in various ASD investigations, including behaviour, locomotion, speech, facial emotion expression, neuroimaging, genetics, and metabolomics (29),(30). Consequently, AI techniques are increasingly being utilised and accepted, demonstrating the effectiveness of ML methods in extracting information from large datasets. This makes ML an attractive tool for ongoing ASD clinical and research projects, offering potential avenues for enhancing ASD screening, diagnosis, and treatment tools. Cutting-edge technologies like ML have been studied and applied to increase diagnostic efficiency, speed, and quality in ASD research. These ML methods include artificial neural networks, support vector machines, a priori algorithms, and decision trees (31). Many of these methods have been used to construct prediction models for autism-related datasets. In the rehabilitation of autistic patients, robots are being employed as social interaction facilitators. Robot-assisted Autism Therapy (RAAT) is used to encourage children to speak or engage in activities (27),(30). The robot can interact with autistic children in ways that promote the development of shared attention. Video games are also utilised to enhance motor skills and body schema orientation (26),(30).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Alzheimer’s Disease

Breakthroughs in high-quality omics platforms and imaging technologies present unprecedented opportunities to explore the origin and evolution of diseases. ML approaches offer new ways to handle multiscale data, integrate data from various sources, explain etiological and clinical heterogeneity, and discover new biomarkers. In Alzheimer’s research, AI is applied in molecular neuroimaging, particularly in Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) (32). Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) is a scalable imaging technique used for extensive data in neurology, particularly in neurodegenerative diseases (32). A transcriptomic-based approach to drug repurposing involves contrasting medication-induced gene expression with AD gene expression. AI has also shown benefits in social and companionship roles, as simple animal-like robots have been found to reduce loneliness ratings in older individuals (32),(33). Socially Assistive Robots (SAR) have been shown to increase social contact with peers of the subject (34). Robot-assisted therapy is also utilised in the treatment of Alzheimer’s. Combining computer capacity with quantifiable chemical patterns, such as using ML and AI technologies, can help address these challenges. Wearable AI devices and gadgets are also used in the rehabilitation of Alzheimer’s patients. Several applications and chatbots provide emotional, social, and mental support for individuals with cognitive impairment (33),(34). In addition to biofluid biomarkers, other modalities such as electrical signal measurements of brain waves, AI-mediated memory tests, and online language analysis are being investigated for AD diagnosis using AI-mediated data analysis techniques (35). ML and AI have the potential to open new avenues for precise, non invasive, and accessible early diagnosis of AD, as well as personalised techniques for disease management based on specific prognoses and therapy responses. AI classifiers can assist in identifying individuals at high risk of developing psychotic illnesses using neuroimaging data or cognitive testing (36). AI can significantly accelerate, improve accuracy, and enhance the objectivity of neurodegenerative disease diagnosis (36).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

The heterogeneous disorder known as ADHD affects the neurodevelopment of the brain. Diagnostic tools for ADHD include motion analysis, physiological signals, questionnaires, gaming simulators, performance tests, and brain MRI (37). However, there has been a neglect of other evaluation techniques for ADHD apart from MRI and a lack of focus on utilising data from wearable devices such as Photoplethysmography (PPG), Electrocardiography (ECG), and motion data for diagnosing ADHD (38). Personalised educational aids have the potential to improve learning outcomes, facilitate better social integration, and reduce stigma, social exclusion, and stressful situations like bullying, which are common factors contributing to suicide attempts (39). A significant advantage of ML approaches is their ability to consider inter-regional correlations in the brain, enabling the identification of subtle and geographically dispersed effects (40). ML models enable individual level statistical inference, which can aid in making individual diagnostic or prognostic judgments. In addressing the limitations of various mental disorders, ML and DL methods have been applied to diagnose ADHD. They have been utilised in cognitive behaviour therapy, training, rehabilitation, behavioural change, psychosocial motivation, attention improvement, and feedback (41).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Post-traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)

The PTSD reactions are characterised by variability in their clinical manifestations and aetiologies. ML technologies are being employed in medical disciplines that face similar challenges of heterogeneity in aetiology and outcome to address this fundamental variability (42). The identification of PTSD in patients can be done using imaging data, biometric data {such as sleep, Heart Rate Variability (HRV), and skin conductance}, and computer or smartphone questionnaires collected through linked devices (43). Combining MRI and ML techniques makes it feasible to identify a patient with PTSD. Monitoring techniques have been utilised to assess the diagnostic criteria for PTSD, with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) emerging as the most promising method (43),(44). Analysing various neurological substrates of PTSD using functional network models consistently revealed findings in line with previous research on desegregation in PTSD, showing increased connectivity among several networks during rest (44). The application of Resting state- Functional MRI (rs-fMRI) network models specific to PTSD demonstrates the potential for advancement in the field (44). The creation of vector-autoregressive networks would enable exploration of time-dependent connections between brain areas in PTSD patients and could be facilitated by temporally accurate techniques such as electroencephalography or magnetoencephalography. DL’s ability to combine multimodal data from digital devices like smartphones or smartwatches offers new opportunities for identifying transdiagnostic indicators to remotely detect and monitor individuals at risk. By leveraging advances in computational psychiatry, digital phenotyping can maximise the diagnostic and prognostic value of digitally collected biomarkers. Digital communication also enables the delivery of clinical interventions through telehealth applications. AI and natural language processing are utilised in the evaluation and clinical treatment process (45). ML techniques have significant potential in developing precise diagnostic and prediction models for PTSD and risk of stress pathology based on a various existing data sources (44).

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

Significant advancements have been made in the neurobiology of OCD in recent years (46). Research in this area has helped in deve-loping neurobiological models of OCD, showcasing international scientific collaboration, and leading to various therapeutic impli-cations. Neuroimaging has been extensively utilised by researchers worldwide to study OCD (46),(47). Early studies indicated the involvement of specific brain circuits and systems in OCD, which is characterised by recurrent intrusive thoughts (obsessions) and compulsive actions (47). CT, PET, and SPECT have been employed in OCD studies to examine brain morphometry and glucose metabolism (46),(47),(48),(49). Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI) has been used to observe brain activation patterns during specific states related to the condition, incorporating various emotional and cognitive paradigms that may be relevant (47). For many individuals with OCD, medications and psychological therapies may not be effective (49). As an alternative therapy, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) has shown promise (46),(49). rTMS and Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) activation affect different brain targets in OCD, including the supplementary motor area, orbitofrontal cortex/medial prefrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and Anterior Cingulate Cortex (ACC) (49). The introduction of dTMS Hesed (H) coils and functional neuroimaging has advanced focused brain stimulation, bringing us closer to understanding and treating OCD (47). A study using deep TMS found that increased electroencephalogram activity during attention tasks was associated with an improvement in OCD symptoms, consistent with attention network activation (49).

Conclusion

Robotic care and AI-based DL, ML, and DL apps can facilitate the delivery of treatment for mental illnesses, making it more accessible for patients. However, further research is needed to address the significant ethical and societal implications associated with these technologies, and the fields of AI and psychological therapies require continued study. The effectiveness of AI-based therapies in identifying, predicting, and treating mental health issues is remarkably high. AI can provide convenient options for the treatment of mental illnesses, allowing individuals to access care at their own convenience. The integration of AI frameworks can enhance the efficacy and accessibility of existing healthcare systems. To fully realise the potential of AI, collaboration among various stakeholders is essential, including experts in mental healthcare, ethics, technology, engineering, healthcare system management, entrepreneurs, and others. AI plays a crucial role in the early detection, prevention, and intervention of mental health issues. It also contributes to establishing benchmarks for improving individual mental health and providing more accurate and beneficial predictions for personal mental health.

Authors’ contribution: MK for conceptualisation, data collection, methodology, original draft and writing review. SA for conceptualisation, supervision and editing. SS for supervision. H for conceptualisation, data curation and editing. AS for editing.

References

1.
Su C, Xu Z, Pathak J, Wang F. Deep learning in mental health outcome research: A scoping review. Transl Psychiatry. 2020;10(1):116. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-0780-3. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sajjadian M, Lam RW, Milev R, Rotzinger S, Frey BN, Soares CN, et al. Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Medicine. 2021;51(16):2742-51. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721003871. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Pinaya WH, Mechelli A, Sato JR. Using deep autoencoders to identify abnormal brain structural patterns in neuropsychiatric disorders: A large-scale multi-sample study. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(3):944-54. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24423. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Abd-Alrazaq A, Alajlani M, Alhuwail D, Schneider J, Al-Kuwari S, Shah Z, et al. Artificial intelligence in the fight against COVID-19: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(12):e20756. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2196/20756. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Vigo D, Thornicroft G, Atun R. Estimating the true global burden of mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(2):171-78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00505-2. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Pedro D. A few useful things to know about machine learning. Communications of the ACM. 2012;55(10):78-87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1145/2347736.2347755. [crossref]
7.
Zhong X, Shi H, Ming Q, Dong D, Zhang X, Zeng LL, et al. Whole-brain resting-state functional connectivity identified major depressive disorder: A multivariate pattern analysis in two independent samples. J Affect Disord. 2017;218:346-52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.040. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Mehta A, Niles AN, Vargas JH, Marafon T, Couto DD, Gross JJ. Acceptability and effectiveness of artificial intelligence therapy for anxiety and depression (youper): Longitudinal observational study. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(6):e26771. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2196/26771. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Wang X, Ren Y, Zhang W. Depression disorder classification of FMRI data using sparse low-rank functional brain network and graph-based features. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine. 2017;2017:e3609821. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3609821. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Schnyer DM, Clasen PC, Gonzalez C, Beevers CG. Evaluating the diagnostic utility of applying a machine learning algorithm to diffusion tensor MRI measures in individuals with major depressive disorder. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2017;264:01-09. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2017.03.003. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Bhaumik R, Jenkins LM, Gowins JR, Jacobs RH, Barba A, Bhaumik DK, et al. Multivariate pattern analysis strategies in detection of remitted major depressive disorder using resting state functional connectivity. Neuroimage Clin. 2017;16:390-98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2016.02.018. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Tran T, Luo W, Phung D, Harvey R, Berk M, Kennedy RL, et al. Risk stratification using data from electronic medical records better predicts suicide risks than clinician assessments. BMC Psychiatry. 2014;14:76. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-76. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Garcia-Ceja E, Riegler M, Nordgreen T, Jakobsen P, Oedegaard KJ, Tørresen J. Mental health monitoring with multimodal sensing and machine learning: A survey. Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 2018;51:01-26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.09.003. [crossref]
14.
Mohr DC, Zhang M, Schueller SM. Personal sensing: Understanding mental health using ubiquitous sensors and machine learning. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017;13:23-47. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-044949. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Torous J, Wisniewski H, Bird B, Carpenter E, David G, Elejalde E, et al. Creating a digital health smartphone app and digital phenotyping platform for mental health and diverse healthcare needs: An interdisciplinary and collaborative approach. J Technol Behav Sci. 2019;4(2):73-85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41347-019-00095-w. [crossref]
16.
Lee EE, Torous J, De Choudhury M, Depp CA, Graham SA, Kim HC, et al. Artificial intelligence for mental health care: Clinical applications, barriers, facilitators, and artificial wisdom. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2021;6(9):856-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2021.02.001. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Ben-Zeev D, Brian R, Wang R, Wang W, Campbell AT, Aung MSH, et al. Crosscheck: Integrating self-report, behavioral sensing, and smartphone use to identify digital indicators of psychotic relapse. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2017;40(3):266-75. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1037/prj0000243. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Laacke S, Mueller R, Schomerus G, Salloch S. Artificial intelligence, social media and depression. A new concept of health-related digital autonomy. Am J Bioeth. 2021;21(7):04-20. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2020.1863515. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Fulmer R, Joerin A, Gentile B, Lakerink L, Rauws M. Using psychological artificial intelligence (Tess) to relieve symptoms of depression and anxiety: Randomized controlled trial. JMIR Ment Health. 2018;5(4):e64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2196/mental.9782. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Mandar D, Rao V. Depression detection using emotion artificial intelligence. In 2017 International Conference on Intelligent Sustainable Systems (ICISS). 2017;858-62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISS1.2017.8389299. [crossref]
21.
Oliver LD, Hawco C, Viviano JD, Voineskos AN. From the group to the individual in schizophrenia spectrum disorders: Biomarkers of social cognitive impairments and therapeutic translation. Biological Psychiatry. 2022;91(8):699-708. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.09.007. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Lai JW, Ang CKE, Acharya UR, Cheong KH. Schizophrenia: A survey of artificial intelligence techniques applied to detection and classification. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6099. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18116099. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Koutsouleris N, Kahn RS, Chekroud AM, Leucht S, Falkai P, Wobrock T, et al. Multisite prediction of 4-week and 52-week treatment outcomes in patients with first-episode psychosis: A machine learning approach. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3(10):935-46. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30171-7. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Li A, Zalesky A, Yue W, Howes O, Yan H, Liu Y, et al. A neuroimaging biomarker for striatal dysfunction in schizophrenia. Nat Med. 2020;26(4):558-65. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0793-8. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Redlich R, Opel N, Grotegerd D, Dohm K, Zaremba D, Bürger C, et al. Prediction of individual response to electroconvulsive therapy via machine learning on structural magnetic resonance imaging data. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(6):557-64. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0316. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Birmaher B, Axelson D, Monk K, Kalas C, Goldstein B, Hickey MB, et al. Lifetime psychiatric disorders in school-aged offspring of parents with bipolar disorder: The Pittsburgh bipolar offspring study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66(3):287-96. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2008.546. [crossref][PubMed]
27.
Grove J, Ripke S, Als TD, Mattheisen M, Walters RK, Won H, et al. Identification of common genetic risk variants for autism spectrum disorder. Nature Genetics. 2019;51(3):431-44. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0344-8. [crossref][PubMed]
28.
Wall DP, Kosmicki J, DeLuca TF, Harstad E, Fusaro VA. Use of machine learning to shorten observation-based screening and diagnosis of autism. Transl Psychiatry. 2012;2(4):e100-e100. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2012.10. [crossref][PubMed]
29.
Duda M, Ma R, Haber N, Wall DP. Use of machine learning for behavioral distinction of autism and ADHD. Transl Psychiatry. 2016;6(2):e732-e732. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/tp.2015.221. [crossref][PubMed]
30.
Bone D, Bishop SL, Black MP, Goodwin MS, Lord C, Narayanan SS. Use of machine learning to improve autism screening and diagnostic instruments: Effectiveness, efficiency, and multi-instrument fusion. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016;57(8):927-37. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12559. [crossref][PubMed]
31.
Marciano F, Venutolo G, Ingenito CM, Verbeni A, Terracciano C, Plunk E, et al. Artificial Intelligence: The “Trait D’Union” in different analysis approaches of autism spectrum disorder studies. Curr Med Chem. 2021;28(32):6591-618. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2174/0929867328666210203205221. [crossref][PubMed]
32.
Elshoky B, Ibrahim OAS, Ali AA. Machine learning techniques based on feature selection for improving autism disease classification. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Information Sciences. 2021;21(2):65-81. Doi: 10.21608/ijicis.2021.61582.1058. [crossref]
33.
Borhani N, Ghaisari J, Abedi M, Kamali M, Gheisari Y. A deep learning approach to predict inter-omics interactions in multi-layer networks. BMC Bioinformatics. 2022;23(1):53. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-022-04569-2.[crossref][PubMed]
34.
Eyigoz E, Mathur S, Santamaria M, Cecchi G, Naylor M. Linguistic markers predict onset of Alzheimer’s Disease. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;28:100583. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100583. [crossref][PubMed]
35.
Fu GS, Levin-Schwartz Y, Lin QH, Zhang D. Machine learning for medical imaging. Journal of Healthcare Engineering. 2019;2019:9874591. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9874591. [crossref][PubMed]
36.
Suzuki K. Pixel-based machine learning in medical imaging. International Int J Biomed Imaging. 2012;2012:e792079. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/792079. [crossref][PubMed]
37.
Sanfelici R, Dwyer DB, Antonucci LA, Koutsouleris N. Individualized diagnostic and prognostic models for patients with psychosis risk syndromes: A meta-analytic view on the state of the art. Biological Psychiatry. 2020;88(4):349-60. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2020.02.009. [crossref][PubMed]
38.
Deping K, He L. Classification on ADHD with Deep Learning. 2014 International Conference on Cloud Computing and Big Data. 2014;27-32. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.1109/CCBD.2014.42.
39.
OrrÙ G, Pettersson-Yeo W, Marquand AF, Sartori G, Mechelli A. Using support vector machine to identify imaging biomarkers of neurological and psychiatric disease: A critical review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2012;36(4):1140-52. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.01.004. [crossref][PubMed]
40.
Mayer JS, Hees K, Medda J, Grimm O, Asherson P, Bellina M, et al. Bright light therapy versus physical exercise to prevent co-morbid depression and obesity in adolescents and young adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-017-2426-1. [crossref][PubMed]
41.
Koh JEW, Ooi CP, Lim-Ashworth NSJ, Vicnesh J, Tor HT, Lih OS, et al. Automated classification of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and conduct disorder using entropy features with ECG signals. Comput Biol Med. 2022;140:105120. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.105120. [crossref][PubMed]
42.
Gwernan-Jones R, Moore DA, Cooper P, Russell AE, Richardson M, Rogers M, et al. A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research: The influence of school context on symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 2016;21(1):83-100. Available at: https://doi.org/10. 1080/13632752.2015.1120055. [crossref]
43.
He Q, Veldkamp BP, Glas CA, de Vries T. Automated assessment of patients’ self-narratives for posttraumatic stress disorder screening using natural language processing and text mining. Assessment. 2017;24(2):157-72. [crossref][PubMed]
44.
Bourla A, Mouchabac S, El Hage W, Ferreri F. E-PTSD: An overview on how new technologies can improve prediction and assessment of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2018;9(sup1):1424448. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/20008198.2018.1424448. [crossref][PubMed]
45.
Dean KR, Hammamieh R, Mellon SH, Abu-Amara D, Flory JD, Guffanti G, et al. Multi-Omic biomarker identification and validation for diagnosing warzone-related post-traumatic stress disorder. Molecular Psychiatry. 2020;25(12):3337- 49. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-019-0496-z. [crossref][PubMed]
46.
Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (RTMS): An update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474-528. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. [crossref][PubMed]
47.
Harika-Germaneau G, Rachid F, Chatard A, Lafay-Chebassier C, Solinas M, Thirioux B, et al. Continuous theta burst stimulation over the supplementary motor area in refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder treatment: A randomized sham-controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2019;12(6):1565-71. Available at: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.brs.2019.07.019. [crossref][PubMed]
48.
Ji GJ, Sun J, Liu P, Wei J, Li D, Wu X, Zhang L, et al. Predicting long-term after-effects of theta-burst stimulation on supplementary motor network through one-session response. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:237. Available at: https://doi. org/10.3389/fnins.2020.00237. [crossref][PubMed]
49.
Carmi L, Tendler A, Bystritsky A, Hollander E, Blumberger DM, Daskalakis J, et al. Efficacy and safety of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A prospective multicenter randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2019;176(11):931-38. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18101180.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/61698.19249

Date of Submission: Nov 21, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Mar 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 10, 2023
Date of Publishing: Apr 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Nov 23, 2022
• Manual Googling: Mar 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 27, 2023 (11%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com