i—gelâ„¢ in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA—ProSealâ„¢ in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients 80-84
Dr Anjan Das,
174, Gorakshabashi Road, Royal Plaza Apartment, (4th Floor, Flat No-1) Nagerbazar, Kolkata-28, India.
Phone: (+91) 9874171440 E-mail: email@example.com
Introduction: Supraglottic devices have mostly eliminated the need of hemodynamically stressful routine endotracheal intubation for ambulatory surgeries. We aimed to compare hemodynamics- like blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) alterations caused by stress response due to i-gelâ„¢ and LMA-ProSealâ„¢ usage in Day care surgeries. Secondary outcomes included ease of insertion, time and number of attempts for the placement of devices.
Materials and Methods: From April 2008 to July 2009, Sixty adult ASA I-II patients of either sex, aged 20-30, were randomly allocated into two groups (Group i-gel (n=30) receiving i-gel and Group PLMA (n=30) receiving LMA-ProSeal for airway maintenance) undergoing day care surgical procedures under general anaesthesia (GA).The ease of insertion and time taken for placement of device, postoperative complications were assessed. Haemodynamic parameters (HR, BP) were noted. It was a prospective, double blinded, and randomized controlled study. Parametric data were analyzed with the unpaired t-test and non-parametric data were analyzed with the Chi-square test. Unless otherwise stated, data are presented as mean (+ SD). p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Demographically both the groups were similar. i-gel was more easily inserted than LMA-ProSeal (90% vs. 83.33% respectively). i-gel insertion time was shorter than PLMA (14.9 vs. 20.0 sec respectively) and was statistically significant. Hemodynamics (HR, BP) were less altered in i-gel than PLMA and the results were statistically significant (p<0.05).
Conclusion: i-Gel; a relatively newer and cheap supraglottic device; insertion is easier and quicker as well as hemodynamically less stressful when compared with LMAâ€”ProSeal in a day care setting.