Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 209414

AbstractConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Reviews
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : LE07 - LE10 Full Version

Current Status of Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine, its Usage and Efficacy: A Narrative Review


Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63348.17943
Ratan Tandon, Abhishek Joshi

1. Intern, Department of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Professor, Department of Community Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ratan Tandon,
17A/3, Patrika Marg, Civil Lines Behind Regency Hotel, Prayagraj-211001, Uttar Pradesh, India.
E-mail: ratantandon1@gmail.com

Abstract

The creation of a vaccine against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) has received top focus worldwide. The majority of the COVID-19 vaccine candidates are administered Intramuscularly (IM). Intranasal (IN) vaccines offer a great benefit due to the first involvement of mucosa of the nasal cavity in the due course of disease, also SARS-CoV-2 is spread through respiratory secretions which are infectious, and mucosal immunity due to IN vaccination could contribute significantly to controlling this disease. IN vaccination has been shown in preclinical and clinical investigations to produce significant levels of neutralising antibodies, mucosal IgA, and T-cell responses that protect against SARS-CoV-2 infection in the respiratory pathway. Blocking Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) infection and transmission requires the immune system response at the initial infection site of the virus. Many IN vaccines are currently under trial for their safety and efficacy, while some are recently approved for use in specific conditions in India and are proven to be protective against the virus and also safe. In this context, this review will provide knowledge of the IN vaccines for their effectiveness and application.

Keywords

Infection, Mucosal vaccines, Oral vaccines, Vaccination

COVID-19 is caused due to SARS-CoV-2. Through interaction with another individual who has the virus, one can contract COVID-19. The virus can affect any organ system, but majorly it affects the respiratory system. People who have COVID-19 may experience a number of symptoms, ranging in severity from moderate to severe. Symptoms could start to show up after 2-14 days, on an average of 5-6 days of exposure to the virus. Besides from a high temperature or chills, symptoms may also include cough, dyspnoea, exhaustion, body ache, headache, anosmia, sore throat, congestion, rhinorrhoea, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea (1). The amazing ability of our immune system to react and remember harmful material it encounters, is used by vaccines. A perfect vaccination should offer immediate, comprehensive, long-lasting protection by preventing the illness from leading to serious outcome, hospitalisation, and death. Following vaccination, B-cells that create antibodies mediate the adaptive immune response (2).

Vaccination through the mucosal route can provide an effective and safe method for achieving robust immune responses (systemic, humoural) in addition to mucosal immunity (IgA) in humans because the principal entry portal for coronavirus in the body is mainly made up of mucosal surfaces (Oral, Nasal). The first-line barrier to coronavirus is our nasal compartment before the virus spreads to the pulmonary system [3-6]. The infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 will show no symptoms or as a moderate upper respiratory illness, but will nonetheless cause the oral and nasal mucosa to shed the virus. According to the study, shedding in silent infections was of shorter length but frequently to comparable virus levels initially. Transmission of the coronavirus has been linked to asymptomatic and presymptomatic shedding (7). There are several COVID-19 vaccines, the bulk of which are IM injections that induce protective immunity. IN vaccines are being developed for COVID-19 (Table/Fig 1). They have demonstrated the potential to elicit an immune response that is antibody-mediated and robust cell-mediated immunity, protective mucosal immunity with ease to administer.

Intranasal vaccine can also reduce the infection caused by COVID-19 virus, shedding and replication as well as the progression of the disease and by generating IgA antibody responses in the mucosa of cavity of nose, which limits the transmission of virus (8).

REVIEW

A vast network of non lymphoid cells, chemicals, lymphocytes, makes up mucosal immunity (e.g., cytokines, chemokines, and antibodies). Injectable vaccinations typically do a poor job of inducing mucosal immunity, however IN immunisation can strongly induce mucosal immunity. This helps to restrict the growth of mucosal infections. The respiratory epithelial layer, which is the first line of defence is activated when a virus enters into the cavity of the nose [9,10]. Upper respiratory tract is poorly controlled by IM vaccinations, which results in silent or milder clinical infections that can still spread the virus to others. IN vaccinations, additionally, may promote sterile immunity against mucosal infections (10). Wu S et al., originally showed that an Ad5-vectored vaccine that was replication-defective, evoked both immune responses that are systemic and mucosal against SARS-CoV-2 when administered IN (11). Single mucosal (simultaneous oral and IN delivery), or Ad5-nCoV IM produced increased levels of serum neutralising Ig in ferrets. The development of IgA antibodies in trachea-lung washes which are S-specific, according to mouse research, can only be increased by immunisation with IN. Ferrets were resistant to infection caused by viruses in respiratory tracts after mucosal vaccination after SARS-CoV-2 challenge; whereas, IM immunisation failed to decrease the virus in the respiratory tract significantly. IN immunisation with Ad5-S-nb2 induces immunity (mucosal, systemic) in rhesus macaques and mice, as shown by Feng L et al., (12).

BBV154

An IN SARS-CoV-2 vectored chimpanzee adenovirus vaccination called BBV154 has poor replication. It consists of a ChAd vector with a replication defect that expresses stable spike SARS-CoV-2. In a study, it has been observed that BBV154 administration IN had great safety profiles and evoked strong immune response (mucosal and humoral) and the one which is mediated by Th1. Heterologous vaccination of COVAXIN-prime (IM) and BBV154 (IN) boosters has induced cross-variant protective immune responses (13). For emergency usage (in individuals over 18-year-old) in India, a nasal COVID-19 vaccination based on Washington University is approved as a booster dose for those who have received the other two doses of vaccines (13). The clearance comes after the Government of India granted emergency use permission for the IN vaccine as a primary series of two doses in September. This makes the IN vaccine the world’s first to be approved as both a primary vaccination for COVID-19 and a booster.

3100 participants participated in Phase-3 studies across 14 trial.sites in India for immunogenicity and safety. Third dose (Booster) of the BBV154 IN vaccine was given to research participants who had already received approved COVID-19 vaccines and Heterologous booster dose studies for safety and immunogenicity were performed. Nine trials locations were used for the clinical trials in India (14). This vaccine offers the dual advantages of facilitating the rapid creation of variant-specific vaccinations and facilitating simple nasal administration that permits bulk immunisation to guard against new Variants Of Concern (VOC). It has the potential to be a crucial tool for mass immunisation campaigns during pandemics and endemics (15). Almost any adult in India can receive the vaccination, which is given as drops in the nose. Both those who have never gotten a COVID-19 vaccination and those who have previously received COVID-19 shots are eligible.

In India, two doses of the COVID-19 vaccination have now been administered to an estimated 900 million people. In addition to not requiring a needle, the key benefit of the nasal vaccine is that it stimulates an immune response in the nose and upper airway, the place where the virus takes entry into the body. By doing this, it may be able to stop an infection and end the transmission cycle. This nasal vaccine’s technology is also flexible, enabling quick and simple adjustments to accommodate newly emerging VOC (16). A recent study compared the effectiveness of vaccines given by IN and IM route delivery of a chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-S) expressing a stabilised S protein. Contrary to hamsters receiving IM vaccine, those getting vaccination through the IN route had a stronger immune response, which is mediated by antibodies, that was able to neutralise the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Additionally, the inoculated hamsters were shielded against SARS-CoV-2 exposure and were not affected by a viral infection, which would have caused weight loss in the hamsters. Also, a decrease in inflammatory genes transcript levels and better clinical conditions were seen, as well as lower viral loads in pulmonary and IN swabs. By providing IN vaccination, the vaccine increases protection from SARS-CoV-2 infection and decreases viral particle spread (17).

COVI-VAC

The Serum Institute of India has begun producing COVI-VAC, a live-attenuated IN vaccine for COVID-19, in conjunction with Codagenix (United States), which is currently conducting a Phase-3 clinical research (NCT04619628) to evaluate its safety 8and immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2. An IN vaccine, live attenuated called CoviLivTM expresses all proteins of SARS-CoV-2, not just spike, allowing for the generation of broad immunity against a variety of viral antigens and possibly boosting effectiveness against variations. The vaccine was created with the use of the Codagenix platform technology, which re-codes a virus’ genetic code to transform it from a pathogen that causes disease into a stable and secure live-attenuated vaccine. CoviLiv will be tested against circulating SARS-CoV-2 strains in healthy adults in nations with poor vaccination rates like Africa, perhaps South America, and Asia in the worldwide Phase-3 trial to look for its safety, effectiveness, and immunogenicity to placebo. CoviLiv’s preliminary clinical data show that the dose chosen for the IN vaccine had a seroresponse rate of 100% and established mucosal immunity, efficient to block nasal replication. CoviLiv also stimulates widespread cellular immune responses against a number of SARS-CoV-2-proteins, including those seen in Omicron BA.2. Serum Institute of India is also examining the possibility of CoviLiv as a booster shot IN along with Codagenix, in Phase-1 clinical investigation (UK based), along with efficacy trial (Phase-3). In this ongoing investigation, healthy adults who have previously received COVID-19 vaccinations with mRNA or adenovirus vectors will have their booster response assessed (18).

AdCOVID

AdCOVID, developed by US-based Alt Immune, Adenovirus-vectored vaccine for IN administration that expresses the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein healthy adult volunteers in the age group of 18 to 55 years, participated in a clinical trial Phase-1 for the AdCOVID vaccine to assess its immunogenicity and safety. AdCOVID was administered to the subjects as a nasal spray in either 1 or 2 doses at three dosage levels. The immunogenicity assessment of AdCOVID included serum binding and neutralising antibody titre mucosal IgA antibody from nasopharyngeal swabs post-vaccination, in addition to the primary research outcome of safety and tolerability. AdCOVID seems to be well tolerated. The immunogenicity results showed that none of the investigated immunological parameters produced immune responses that were as strong as anticipated. The response and the percentage of people responding to AdCOVID were significantly less than what had been shown for other vaccines previously approved for use in emergency, despite antibodies being found that bound the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein and neutralised the virus. After this Phase-1 trial is over, Alt Immune will stop working on developing AdCOVID (19).

NasoVAX was also examined by Alt Immune in clinical trials Phase II (NCT04442230). It is a recombinant monovalent influenza vaccine that is delivered intravenously. The antigen of influenza is expressed in the target cell via an adenovector. Compared to conventional influenza vaccines, this results in a wider and quicker immunological response (20). With elevated IgG antibody levels and a sizable quantity of mucosal immunological response, the IN vaccination induced a potent antibody-mediated immune response. These results indicate that non invasive IN vaccines should be taken into consideration for the development of vaccine in future (21).

ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine

In conjunction with AstraZeneca, Oxford University is creating the vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The ChAdOx1 vector used for the vaccine is an adenovirus that causes the common cold but has been genetically altered such that it cannot multiply in people. An initial dose of vaccine was administered to 30 previously unvaccinated study participants IN. Additionally, 12 participants who had previously received a typical two-dose COVID-19 immunisation schedule by injection were given the IN vaccine as part of a study to examine the viability of the IN vaccine as a booster. In a Phase-1 experiment, their nasal vaccine candidate fell short, failing to elicit a robust immune response in the nasal mucosa of the majority of patients. In comparison to IM immunisations, the spray also induced lesser systemic immune responses. They speculated that a significant portion of the spray might be ingested and incinerated in the stomach. The vaccination should ideally be injected right into the lungs [22-24].Their vaccine did not perform well.

Ad5-nCoV

Chongqing Zhifei Biological Products and CanSino Biologics Inc. researchers performed a placebo-controlled, randomised double-blind research to find out the safety and immunogenicity of the Ad5-nCoV inhalation vaccination in individuals aged above 18 years (NCT04840992). They developed an inhaled version of the vaccine that had been approved for use at the time of emergency as a booster dose by the country’s drug regulator. With the brand name, Convidecia AirTM is a non invasive alternative that employs a nebuliser to turn liquid into an aerosol for inhalation through the mouth. It uses the same viral vector technical platform as the IM version ConvideciaTM. With just one breath, Convidecia AirTM, a needle-free medication, can successfully stimulate an all-encompassing immune response against the SARS-CoV-2 virus [25,26]. The vaccine is approved in 2 countries, China and Morocco.

MV-014-212

A chimeric SARS-CoV-2 spike is a viral protein, enveloped, present in the live, attenuated, human respiratory syncytial virus, recombinant, known as MV-014-212. An attenuated, immunogenic version of MV-014-212 was found in African Green Monkeys (AGMs). MV-014-212 one mucosal dose protected against SARS in AGMs. In a clinical trial Phase-1, MV-014-212 is now being assessed as an IN vaccination (NCT04798001) (27).

CROWNase

CROWNase, an inhalation treatment being tested as a novel COVID-19 vaccination at the Illinois Institute of Technology in Chicago, has the capability to reduce infection caused by SARS-CoV-2. S-protein provides SARS-CoV-2 which appears like a crown, allowing the virus to spread infection by adhering to hACE2. Human-derived compounds that coat the S-protein aid the virus in evading our immune system and infecting the host cells. By dissolving the S-covering, the protein’s CROWNase activates the immune system by revealing the protein component. This hinders the virus’s ability to infect human cells even more. The receptor Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) is a component of CROWNase, which enhances the effectiveness of its viral binding. CROWNase inhalation treatment is intended to be used in an outpatient situation. According to the researchers, CROWNase may also be used orally, as a pill, injectable, solution, eye drops or ointment, or as a nasal spray in addition to being inhaled (28).

DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT

DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT1, IN spray, influenza vectored, live attenuated vaccine pointing (RBD) of viral S protein, has successfully completed its Phase-1 and 2 clinical studies indicating that the vaccine is well tolerated and induces mucosal as well as systemic immunity. Currently, the vaccine is undergoing a Phase-3 trial (29).

Safety and Efficacy

Given the advantages of nasal vaccine over traditional vaccines, which improve patient compliance and reduce the need for specialist healthcare workers to administer the vaccine, vaccine delivery via the nasal route seems to be a viable option. At the pulmonary pathogen’s entrance point, IN vaccination has the ability to produce a prolonged and cross-protective immune system response.

Clinical trials are increasing, indicating the widely recognised requirement for IN vaccinations that can be administered easily and provide greater benefits over other vaccine delivery systems in terms of formulation costs. Other than those for influenza, which show the efficiency of this method, the benefits of directly boosting the mucosal immune response via IN route are apparent, albeit they have not yet been fully appreciated. These studies must be conducted for both efficacy and safety (30).

Conclusion

The global catastrophe of COVID-19 has accelerated the momentum of the vaccination market like never before. Clinical studies in rhesus macaques and mouse models have led to the development of a variety of IN vaccines. Studies have shown that these vaccines can suppress viral replication and transmission/spread by activating mucosal immunity (secretory) (sIgA) in the upper respiratory tracts. The mucosa of the nasal cavity serves as the initial line of defense against SARS-CoV-2 entry before dissemination into the lungs, making the IN vaccine an ideal strategy for avoiding COVID-19. Without a question, IN vaccines have a potential benefit over IM vaccines. The vaccination method selected, functional vaccine components like adjuvants and vaccine carriers all affect a vaccine’s overall immunostimulatory efficiency. The safety and efficacy profiles of the majority of the SARS-CoV-2 IN vaccines have not yet been proven in people because they are still in early-stage clinical trials.

References

1.
Varghese GM, John R, Manesh A, Karthik R, Abraham OC. Clinical management of COVID-19. Indian J Med Res. 2020;151(5):401-10. Doi: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_957_20. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Pollard AJ, Bijker EM. A guide to vaccinology: From basic principles to new developments. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(2):83-100. Doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-00479-7. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Tiboni M, Casettari L, Illum L. Nasal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: Synergistic or alternative to intramuscular vaccines? Int J Pharm. 2021;603:120686. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120686. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Mudgal R, Nehul S, Tomar S. Prospects for mucosal vaccine: Shutting the door on SARS-CoV-2. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2020;16(12):2921-31. Doi: 10.1080/21645515.2020.1805992. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Travis CR. As plain as the nose on your face: The case for a nasal (mucosal) route of vaccine administration for COVID-19 disease prevention. Front Immunol. 2020;11:591897. Doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.591897. [crossref][PubMed]
6.
Kumar A, Kumar A. Mucosal and transdermal vaccine delivery strategies against COVID-19. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2022;12(5):968-72. Doi: 10.1007/s13346-021-01001-9. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Puhach O, Meyer B, Eckerle I. SARS-CoV-2 viral load and shedding kinetics. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2023;21(3):147-61. Doi: 10.1038/s41579-022-00822-w. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Dhama K, Dhawan M, Tiwari R, Emran TB, Mitra S, Rabaan AA, et al. COVID-19 intranasal vaccines: Current progress, advantages, prospects, and challenges. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2022;18(5):2045853. Doi: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2045853. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Kyd J. Immunity against mucosal pathogens. Hum Vaccin. 2010;6(3):10016. Doi: 10.4161/hv.6.3.10016. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Villena J, Kitazawa H. The modulation of mucosal antiviral immunity by immunobiotics: Could they offer any benefit in the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic? Front Physiol. 2020;11:699. Doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00699. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Wu S, Zhong G, Zhang J, Shuai L, Zhang Z, Wen Z, et al. A single dose of an adenovirus-vectored vaccine provides protection against SARS-CoV-2 challenge. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4081. Doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17972-1. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Feng L, Wang Q, Shan C, Yang C, Feng Y, Wu J, et al. An adenovirus-vectored COVID-19 vaccine confers protection from SARS-COV-2 challenge in rhesus macaques. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):4207. Doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18077-5. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Sunagar R, Prasad SD, Ella R, Vadrevu KM. Preclinical evaluation of safety and immunogenicity of a primary series intranasal COVID-19 vaccine candidate (BBV154) and humoral immunogenicity evaluation of a heterologous prime-boost strategy with COVAXIN (BBV152). Front Immunol. 2022;13:1063679. Doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.1063679. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
World’s first intra-nasal vaccine for COVID developed by India has got approval from the Central Drugs Standard Control Organisation (CDSCO) for restricted use in emergency situations in the age group of 18 and above. [Internet]. [cited 2023 Mar 30]. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1880328.
15.
World’s first intra-nasal vaccine for Covid gets CDSCO nod for restricted use in emergency situations- Times of India. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/rest-of-world/worlds-first-intra-nasal-vaccine-for-covid-gets-cdsco-nod-for-restricted-use-in-emergency-situations/articleshow/95928216.cms.
16.
Bhandari T. WashU’s nasal COVID-19 vaccine approved for use as booster in India. Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis. (2022). Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://medicine.wustl.edu/news/washus-nasal-covid-19-vaccine-approved-for-use-as-booster-in-india/.
17.
Bricker TL, Darling TL, Hassan AO, Harastani HH, Soung A, Jiang X, et al. A single intranasal or intramuscular immunization with chimpanzee adenovirus-vectored SARS-CoV-2 vaccine protects against pneumonia in hamsters. Cell Rep. 2021;36(3):109400. Doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109400.[crossref][PubMed]
18.
Codagenix Initiates Dosing in Phase-3 Efficacy Trial of Intranasal COVID-19 Vaccine as Part of WHO-Sponsored Solidarity Trial Vaccines|Codagenix. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://codagenix.com/codagenix-initiates-dosing-in-phase-3-efficacy-trial-of-intranasal-covid-19-vaccine-as-part-of-who-sponsored-solidarity-trial-vaccines/.
19.
Altimmune Announces Update on AdCOVID TM Phase-1 Clinical. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2021/06/29/ 2255167/0/en/Altimmune-Announces-Update-on-AdCOVID-Phase-1-Clinical- Trial.html.
20.
Altimmune, Inc.: Phase-2, Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of NasoVAX in the prevention of clinical worsening in patients with early Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019 (COVID-19). clinicaltrials.gov; 2022. https:// www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04442230.
21.
Du Y, Xu Y, Feng J, Hu L, Zhang Y, Zhang B, et al. Intranasal administration of a recombinant RBD vaccine induced protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 in mouse. Vaccine. 2021;39(16):2280-87. Doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.03.006. [crossref][PubMed]
22.
Intranasal COVID-19 vaccine candidate’s clinical data highlights need for further development of nasal spray vaccines|University of Oxford. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/2022-10-11-intranasal-covid- 19-vaccine-candidate-s-clinical-data-highlights-need-further.
23.
AstraZeneca’s COVID nasal vax flunks Oxford study. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://www.fiercepharma.com/pharma/astrazenecas-covid-19-nasal-vaccine-spray-comes-bust-oxford.
24.
University of Oxford: A Phase I Study to Determine Safety, Tolerability and Immunogenicity of Intranasal Administration of the COVID Vaccine ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 in Healthy UK Adults. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ct2/show/NCT04816019.
25.
China approves the world’s first inhaled COVID vaccine for emergency use as a booster | Euronews. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://www.euronews.com/ next/2022/09/05/china-approves-the-worlds-first-inhaled-covid-vaccine-for-emergency-use-as-a-booster.
26.
CanSino: Convidecia Air-COVID19 Vaccine Tracker. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/162/.
27.
Meissa Vaccines, Inc.: Phase-1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study to Evaluate Tolerability, Safety, and Immunogenicity of an Intranasal Live Attenuated Respiratory Syncytial Virus Vaccine Expressing Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 in Healthy Adults Ages 18-69 Years. clinicaltrials.gov; 2022. https://clinicaltrials. gov/ct2/show/NCT04798001.
28.
Promising New COVID-19 Treatment in Development at Illinois Tech | Illinois Institute of Technology. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://www.iit.edu/news/ promising-new-covid-19-treatment-development-illinois-tech.
29.
Wantai: DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT1-COVID19 Vaccine Tracker. Accessed: February 2, 2023. https://covid19.trackvaccines.org/vaccines/40/.
30.
Yusuf H, Kett V. Current prospects and future challenges for nasal vaccine delivery. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2017;13(1):34-45. Doi: 10.1080/21645515. 2016.1239668.[crossref][PubMed]

Tables and Figures
[Table / Fig - 1]
DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63348.17943

Date of Submission: Feb 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 11, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 10, 2023
• Manual Googling: Mar 11, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Apr 03, 2023 (10%)

Etymology: Author Origin

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com