Changes in Capacity and Performance in Mobility Across Different Environmental Settings in Children with Cerebral Palsy: An Exploratory Study
Published: August 1, 2015 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2015/.6399
Shraddha Diwan, Jasmin Diwan, Ankita B. Bansal, Pankaj R. Patel
1. Lecturer, Department of Paediatrics Physiotherapy, S.B.B College of Physiotherapy, VS Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
2. Professor & Head, Department of Physiology, GMERS Medical College, Civil Hospital, Gandhinagar, Gujarat, India.
3. MPT Neurology, Department of Paediatrics Physiotherapy, S.B.B College of Physiotherapy, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
4. Dean & Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Smt. NHL Municipal Medical College, V S Hospital, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Shraddha Diwan,
19, Shivkunj Soc, Radhaswami Satsang Road, Ranip, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: drshraddhadiwan@gmail.com
Abstract
Background: Children with cerebral palsy, although having similar diagnosis, varies in their abilities & level of functioning within & across different environmental context e.g. home, school or community setting. Capacity (what a child can do in standardized, controlled environment) may or may not be the same as performance (what a child actually does do in her/her daily environment).
Materials and Methods: After getting approval from Institutional Ethic’s Committee (IEC), 63 children with cerebral palsy (4-16 year, mean 7.4 year with SD 0.39) of all clinical types, Gross Motor Functional Classification System (GMFCS) level I-V were examined for mobility using Gross Motor Functional Measure 88 (GMFM). Motor capacity was assessed in clinical setting by highest of 3 GMFM items attained, i.e., crawling (44), walks with support (68) & walks without support (70). Motor performance was measured by Functional Mobility Scale version 2.
Result: On analysis of motor capacity 42.85% children were walking without support, 15.87% were able to crawl & 26.98% were able walk with support in clinical setting. Spearman’s Correlation was done between GMFM item 70 with FMS 5 (home setting) to check correlation of capacity with performance & was found to be significantly correlated (r=0.586, p=0.04). All three GMFM items were correlated with FMS 5, 50, 500 & found positively correlated. For community setting (FMS 500), 52.38% children were lifted by parents & only 6.34% were using wheel chair mobility. A total of 21.87% patients were able to walk with or without support & still lifted by parents in school or community setting.
Conclusion: Change in capacity and performance of mobility exists mainly in school and community setting in studied population. Context should be given importance to prioritize rehabilitation process.
Keywords
Community, ICF, Motor capacity