Year :
2012
| Month :
August
| Volume :
6
| Issue :
6
| Page :
935 - 937
Full Version
Determination of Sex from the
Tibia in the Punjab Zone
Published: August 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.2353
Seema, Anupama Mahajan
1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sri Guru
Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research,
Vallah (Amritsar), India.
2. Anatomy Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Sri
Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research,
Vallah (Amritsar), India.
Correspondence Address :
H No. 2209, L4 Kot Saligram
Main Toot Sahib Bazaar
Sultanwind Road Amritsar, India.
Phone: 9914754354
E-mail: drseema16@gmail.com
Abstract
Aims and Objectives: Sex determination is an important aspect of forensic science and it is 100% possible when all the skeletal bones are available.
Material and Methods: In the present study, 96 tibia of known sex (62 males and 34 females) were considered.
Results and Conclusion: The weight, length, midshaft circumference and the widths at the upper and the lower end of the tibia were noted. The demarking points for the identification of sex from the various measurements of the tibia were calculated. None of these measurements can identify the sex of the tibia with 100% certainty. However, weight is the best discriminant factor for the identification of the male tibia and the width at the upper end is the best discriminant factor for the identifying the female tibia.
Keywords
Sex, Skeleton, Midshaft circumference, Demarking points
Introduction
Introduction
The tibia is an ideal long bone of the limb which is used for sex determination, as it resists the erosive forces which act and it remains unaffected even after the burial of the body (1). The identification of the living, dead and the skeletal remains is of paramount importance in the routine forensic practice (2),(3). Sex estimation is one of the prime factors which is employed to establish the identity of a person (4). The anthropometric study of bones is important to determine the race and also in medicolegal cases for the determination of stature, age and sex (5). The tibia is an ideal bone as it resists the erosive forces and keeps its anatomical shape for a long time even after the body is buried (6). Sexual dimorphism in the tibia indicates not only the general growth and the musculo-skeletal activity, but also the genetic structure of the population (7). Different populations show a variability in the osteometric dimensions and the standards which are specific for the population which is under study, which should be used for the sex determination (8).
Material and Methods
96 human tibia of known sex (62 males and 34 females) were procured from the Department of Anatomy, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vallah (Amritsar). The ages of these tibia were between 18-55years. They were dried, cleaned and numbered. The bones which showed fractures or any other pathologies were discarded. These were studied for various measurements as follows:- 1. Weight was measured using a single pan which was sensitive to 0.1g. 2. Length was measured on an osteometric board. 3. Mid shaft circumference was measured with a measuring tape at the mid point of the bone. 4. The widths at the upper and the lower end were measured with sliding calipers to the nearest millimetre.
The results were analyzed by using Jeet and Singh Formula (9) according to which we found the demarking points for the various parameters of the tibia in males as well as in females.
Results
Weight of the Tibia Bone
The weights of the right and the left tibia of the males and females were measured. The weight of the right male tibia ranged from 123–341g with a mean of 234.26 + 48.043, whereas the weight of the right female tibia ranged from 109–236 g with a mean of 163.91 + 38.59. In the female right tibia, the maximum weight was 236 g and so we called it as the Identification Point (IP). We classified the right tibia which had a weight of more than 236g as the male right tibia. The lightest male right tibia was of weight 123g and so we classified the male right tibia which had a weight of less than 123g as the female tibia. With this formula, 42% of the right tibia can be assigned as male tibia and 20% can be assigned as female tibia. The standard deviation was calculated for the above range and from this the calculated range (mean ±3SD) was drawn, whichled to the Demarking Points (DP). But with the Demarking Points, the percentage which was identified came down to 16% as male right tibia and 2% as female right tibia (Table/Fig 1). Similar points were noted on the left side and similarly the percentages dropped down from the Identification Points to the Demarking Points. The length, mid-shaft circumference and the widths at the upper and the lower end of the tibia were noted. Also the IP and the DP for the above measurements were found out and they have been shown in the (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4) and (Table/Fig 5). We have compared the percentages of the tibia which were identified by the IP and the DP for various measurements (Table/Fig 6).
Discussion
Sex determination from the long bones or their fragments is often the most important step for the identification of a person. Usually, the poorly preserved or the fragmentary bones are recovered from the crime site. The long bones are often better preserved than the other shorter bones. The sex determination of the skeletons is of utmost importance to the physical and the forensic anthropologists (10). A lot of studies have been done for sexing the long bonesof the body (1),(11),(12).This study which involved some measurable characteristics of the tibia can help in identifying the sex of the tibia. The percentages which were identified by the Identification Points were found to be very high as compared to the Demarking Points. But a 100% accuracy can be drawn from the Demarking Points. Weight was found to be the best discriminating factor for the male tibia and the width at the upper end for the female tibia. Midshaft circumference is also a good criterion for sex determination. But length and the width at the lower end gave little accuracy. For sex determination, any single Demarking Point is required to be crossed by the corresponding bone (right or left). From various previous studies (12),(13) it has become clear that the Demarking Points of one race may not apply to another and those of one zone may not apply to another zone. These are due to regional and racial variations. Therefore, it is customary to evolve separate Demarking Points for different zones. Identification of sex from the long bones has been studied in various populations (14). The average predictive accuracy is different for all. In one study on tibia, it was found to be 82.8% (87.5% for males and 72.2% for females) . Comparison with the other races is not possible as different methods are used in different studies.
Conclusion
From the present study, it was clear that certain parameters of the tibia could help in sex determination from fragments of the tibia also. The sexual dimorphism in the tibia is not only due to the general growth and the musculoskeletal activity, but also due to the genetic structure of the population. The present study considered weight as the best discriminant factor for the identification of the male tibia and the width at the upper end for the identification of the female tibia in the Punjab region.
Reference
| 1. | Bhat VJ. Age estimation from the root development of the mandibular third molars. Medico-legal update. 2004; 4(4): 127-29. | 2. | Rai B, Dhattarwal SK, Anand SC. Sex determination from teeth. A medico-legal update. 2008; 8(1): 3-5. | 3. | Singh G, Singh S, Singh SP. Identification of sex from the tibia. J Anat. Soc. India. 1975; 24(1): 243-249. | 4. | Kirici Y, Ozan H. Determination of sex from the tibia of adult Turkish cadavers. Kaibogakee Zasshi.1999; 74 (5): 537-43. | 5. | Iscan MY, Muller SP. Determination of sex from the tibia. Am. J Phys. Anthropol .1984; 64(1): 53-57. | 6. | Ashley GT. Human sternum- influence of sex and age on its measurement. J. Forensic Med. 1956; 3: 27-43. | 7. | Singh S, Gangrade KC. The sexing of adult clavicles- demarking points for the Varanasi zone. JASI .1968b; 17: 89-100. | 8. | Soni G, Dhall U, Chhabra S. Detrmination of sex from femursdiscriminant analysis. J. Anat.Soc. India. 2010; 59(2): 216-221. | 9. | Jit I, Singh S. The sexing of the adult clavicles. Ind. J. Med. Res. 1966; 54: 551-71. AUTHOR(S): 1. Dr. Seema 2. Dr. Anupama Mahajan PARTICULARS OF CONTRIBUTORS: 1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vallah (Amritsar), India. 2. Anatomy Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Sri Guru Ram Das Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Vallah (Amritsar), India. NAME, ADDRESS, E-MAIL ID OF THE CORRESPONDING AUTHOR: H No. 2209, L4 Kot Saligram Main Toot Sahib Bazaar Sultanwind Road Amritsar, India. Phone: 9914754354 E-mail: drseema16@gmail.com Financial OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: None. Date of Submission: Jan 10, 2012 Date of Peer Review: Apr 01, 2012 Date of Acceptance: Jul 03, 2012 Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012 | 10. | Lee JH, Han SH, Chung IH. Sex determination from the tibia in the Korean population. Korean J. Phys. Anthropol. 2010; 23 (2): 61-66. | 11. | Iscan MY, Yoshino M, Kato S. Sex determination from the tibia standards for contemporary Japan. J. Forensic. Sci. 1994; 39 (3): 785-92. | 12. | Reimers GE, Vazquez VJ, Rosa Adk M, Fernandez SF. Sex determination by the discriminant function analysis of the right tibia in the preHispanic population of the the Canary Islands. For. Sci. Internat. 2000; 108(3): 165-172. | 13. | Sakauce K. A recent sexual determination of the long bones in a Japanese population. Anthropological Science.2004; 112(1): 75-81. | 14. | Rashmi S, Vineeta S, Pandey SK, Singh R, Tripathi SK. Identification of sex from the tibia by discrimination function analysis. J. Ind. Acad. For.Med. 2009; 31 (3): 243-49. |
ID: JCDR/2012/3957:2353
Date of Submission: Jan 10, 2012
Date of Peer Review: Apr 01, 2012
Date of Acceptance: Jul 03, 2012
Date of Publishing: Aug 10, 2012
|