Year :
2023
| Month :
December
| Volume :
17
| Issue :
12
| Page :
ZC01 - ZC06
Full Version
Evaluation of Dental and Periodontal Health Status in Leprosy Patients during Three Different Stages of Drug Regimen: A Cross-sectional Study
Published: December 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64907.18760
Madhumita Choudhari, Pavan Bajaj
1. Intern, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
2. Associate Professor, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Correspondence Address :
Madhumita Choudhari,
Intern, Department of Periodontics and Oral Implantology, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Sawangi, Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: madhumita.a.choudhari@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of oral lesions in leprosy patients and the risk of developing them with the disease are considerably high. Multidrug Therapy (MDT) can effectively treat leprosy, but its effectiveness is heavily dependent on early detection, when chronic disability might be avoided. Poor oral hygiene combined with weakened immunity increases the risk of developing oral lesions in leprosy patients and impacts their overall health.
Aim: To evaluate the oral, dental and periodontal findings in patients during three different stages of drug regimen.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 150 known leprosy patients from four leprosy facilities in the Vidarbha area, Maharashtra, India. Comprehensive oral examination was performed from July 2022 to September 2022, including the Decayed, Missing, Filled Teeth (DMFT) index, assessment of Non-Carious Cervical Lesions (NCCLs), Plaque Index (PI), Papillary bleeding Index (PBI) and complete periodontal examination by measuring Probing Pocket Depth (PPD) and Clinical Attachment Loss (CAL). Descriptive statistics were done utilising SPSS version 23. The Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test was used to check the mean difference between the three groups. The statistical significance established was p<0.05.
Results: The evaluation revealed the prevalence of decayed teeth as 103 out of 150 (68%), that of a missing tooth was 93 out of 150 (62%). NCCLs were found in 80 out of 150 with the prevalence of abrasion as seen in 51 (63.7%) patients and 38 patients (47.5%) for abfraction, and 18 out of 80 patients (22.5%) for erosion. Comparing the PI and PBI between the groups, significantly higher scores were observed in patients who had not undergone treatment (p-value <0.01). CAL was found to be statistically significant with higher scores in patients who had completed their treatment (p-value <0.001).
Conclusion: The findings of the present study indicate that the NCCLS and the DMFT scores were higher in the untreated group. However, there was increased attachment loss in treated patients, which can be supplemented to the drug therapy prescribed for leprosy.
Keywords
Chronic periodontitis, Combination drug therapies, Disease eradication, Hansens disease, Oral health
Introduction
Leprosy, commonly known as Hansen’s disease, is a chronic infectious disease caused by the bacteria Mycobacterium leprae. Leprosy is a chronic granulomatous infectious illness that manifests slowly over time with a preference for mucous membranes of the respiratory system, skin, and peripheral nerves (1). It is a significant public health concern accounting for the high case burden, morbidity, and associated stigma (2). National Leprosy Eradication Programme (NLEP) reported a total of 65,147 new cases of leprosy in 2020-21, with annual new case detection of 4.56 per 1,00,000 as against 1,14,451 cases in 2019-20. Maharashtra was a significant contributor of over 76 per cent of the cases (3). In the Vidarbha region, the prevalence is clustered in Amravati, Buldhana, Chandrapur, Gadchiroli, Gondia, and Wardha than in other districts (4). Children contracting leprosy from adults is primarily transferred through the oral mucosa, which is accounted for second most common site of M. leprae infection and transmission (5). A nasal lesion that obstructs airflow manifests mouth breathing, which causes low intra-oral temperature, allowing the bacillus to thrive (6),(7). There are two clinical types of the illness recognised: tuberculoid leprosy and lepromatous leprosy.
Various studies (8),(9) mentioned in literature for oral findings in leprosy comprise periodontal diseases, gingival bleeding, papillary hypertrophy, and tooth loss. With the advancement of leprosy, deformities such as claw hands, arthralgia, thumb paralysis, contractures and wounds delimit the patients to maintain oral hygiene (6). The clinical kinds of leprosy are categorised using the actions of M. leprae with the human immune system (7).
MDT is utilised as a treatment model effectively curbing the disease but is associated with various side effects throughout the patient’s life. Many factors, including diet, psychological health, and oral and systemic health, are affected. Literature reveal plethora of oral abnormalities comprised of salivary gland hypofunction, altered saliva composition and flow, increased predisposition of caries susceptibility, periodontal diseases, mucositis, angular cheilitis (10).
Despite the literature establishing the oral health profile of patients with leprosy, there is a significant knowledge gap addressing the oral profile pre to, during, and following the MDT. In order to compare the outcomes across different treatment stages, there is a need to look into the state of comprehensive oral and periodontal integrity within the staged-therapy model.
Hence, the aim of this study was to evaluate the oral, dental and periodontal findings in patients of different stages of leprosy so as to create a guide for clinicians to formulate appropriate oral health conservation and rehabilitative outcomes for such patients during the course of their life. This study makes an effort to examine soft and hard tissue and periodontal health in the oral findings, and correlates them with different stages of leprosy.
Material and Methods
A cross-sectional study with 150 patients of leprosy was selected from Anandvan, Amravati, Ashokwan and Dattapur, Maharashtra, India, in the months of July, August and September 2022. The authorised personnel of the leprosy centres were requested to provide written consent. The study was performed under the ethical standards and institutional ethical guidelines prescribed by the university’s Institutional Ethics Committee (Reference no.: DMIMS (DU)/IEC/2022/1190.)
Inclusion criteria: Those dentulous leprosy patients who were having more than 15 teeth, either already under treatment or not yet started with treatment, and consented for study participation were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Edentulous or partially edentulous patients having less than 15 teeth, who do not have any medical records , have not been examined by a medical professional and not giving any consent for participation in the study were excluded.
Sample size estimation: Minimum sample size required
Formula: N=Z21-α/2*p*(1-p)/D2
Z1-α/2=1.96, at 5% level of significance
Percentage of deformities in leprosy patient with deep pockets (highest severity)=6.8%
P=6.8% (11).
D=estimated error (5%)=0.05
=(1.96)2*0.068*(1-0.068)/(0.05)2=98
Minimum sample size required was 98.
Clinical measurements:
The groups were then examined clinically:
• Dental examination:
Intraoral hard tissue examination included the examination of:
1. Caries prevalence was noted using the DMFT index as decayed (D), missing (M) and filled (F) teeth (12).
2. NCCLs primarily attrition, abrasion and abfraction on the buccal/labial, lingual, occlusal, mesial, and distal aspects of the teeth.
• Oral hygiene status:
1. PI (Sillnes and Loe, 1964) (13) was employed to record plaque on the labial/buccal and lingual surfaces and scored on a 0-3 scale.
2. Papillary Bleeding Index (PBI): A periodontal probe (William’s Calibrated Probe) was carefully inserted into the gingival sulcus at the base of the papilla on the mesial aspect and then moved coronally to the papilla tip, repeating it on the distal aspect of the same papilla. The intensity of bleeding thus provoked was recorded on a 0-4 scale using the PBI (Muhlemann HR, 1977) (14).
The PBI score per person was obtained by totalling all the papillary bleeding scores, divided by the number of surfaces examined.
• Periodontal examination:
1. The PPD was recorded with A UNC-15 probe from the free gingival margin to the base of the sulcus (15). CAL was also measured from the gingival margin to the Cement-Enamel Junction (CEJ) (16).
Statistical Analysis
All information was recorded and organised in an MS excel sheet. Descriptive statistics were done utilising SPSS version 23. As the information followed typical distribution, parametric tests were employed to investigate the information. The ANOVA test was used to check the mean difference between the three groups. The post-hoc Tukey HSD test was utilised to check the proportion differences. The statistical significance established was p<0.05.
Results
Among the 150 patients, 54 were men and 96 women. Each group consisted of 50 patients.
A total of 103 out of 150 patients presented with decayed teeth (68.66%). A total of 93 out of 150 patients presented with at least one lost tooth (62.00%), and 64 out of 150 had their teeth filled (42.66%), as displayed in (Table/Fig 1). NCCL were observed in 80 out of 150 patients. A total of 49 out of 96 females (51%) and 31 out of 54 males (57%) that presented with NCCL. A total of 51 out of 80 patients (63.75%) displayed abrasion, 38 out of 80 patients (47.5%) demonstrated the presence of abfraction, and 18 out of 80 patients (22.5%) presented with erosion (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3),(Table/Fig 4),(Table/Fig 5). Mean DMFT score was highest in Group-3 followed by Group-2. Significant difference in DMFT scores was found between Group-1 and 3 and Group-2 and 3 (p=0.001) (Table/Fig 6).
(Table/Fig 7) shows the descriptive statistics and the output of the ANOVA analysis of the oral hygiene status using PBI and PI. Highest PBI score was found in Group-3 (3.44±0.67) and the difference was significant between all the three groups (p<0.01). PI score was lowest in Group-1, followed by Group-2.
The PPD of patients undergoing treatment was 2.28±0.96, while for patients with completed treatment was 2.54±1.11, the difference between the two groups was 0.2±0.7 which was not statistically significant p-value (0.39) (Table/Fig 8),(Table/Fig 9),(Table/Fig 10),(Table/Fig 11).
The CAL of patients undergoing treatment was 5.06±1.26, while for the patients with completed treatment was 6.64±1.13 and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant p-value=0.001. The CAL of the patients who were not undergoing treatment was 4.02±1.09, while that for patients undergoing treatment was 5.06±1.26, and the difference between the two groups was 1.04±1.77 which was statistically significant p-value=0.001 (Table/Fig 12),(Table/Fig 13),(Table/Fig 14),(Table/Fig 15),(Table/Fig 16).
Discussion
Leprosy is one of the world’s oldest diseases (17). Despite advances in all medical science, leprosy remains a public health concern in countries such as India. The principal weapon against leprosy is MDT, which has drastically reduced the incidence of leprosy in India (18). The therapy’s efficacy largely depends on early diagnosis and prompt intervention.
In the present study, oral and comprehensive periodontal examinations were done on patients in different stages of treatment. The dental examination included scrutiny by DMFT index and NCCLs. The prevalence of decayed teeth was 68%, that of missing teeth was 62%, and of the patients who did not have their teeth filled was 42.6%. The findings were in accordance with the study by Souza VA et al., who reported a prevalence of decayed teeth in 73%, 71.4% of missing teeth and 60.3% of the patients did not have their teeth filled (19). The prevalence of abrasion was 71%, abfraction was 47.5% and 22.5% for erosion, which was similar to the findings by Gadge RS and Bajaj PS in a study that examined 200 patients for NCCLs with the prevalence of abrasion being 77%, 44% for abfraction and 29% for erosion (20). Additionally, it has been discovered that the quantity and quality of saliva play a part in the emergence of these lesions. This could be explained by xerostomia brought on by the medications used to treat the illness, which directly impacts these conditions (21).
Recurrent gingival bleeding, papillary expansion of the gums, tooth loss, and hypoesthesia patch along the boundary of the alveolar mucosa define the lepromatous form of leprosy, which is extremely common. Claw hands, numbness, stiff joints, paralysed thumbs, widespread absorption, contractures, fissures, and ulcers are common in leprosy patients, making it difficult to maintain oral hygiene, which worsens oral health. On periodontal examination, a comparison of the difference between the PPD of the patients in all groups was not statistically significant; however, CAL was found to be statistically significant with higher scores in patients who had completed their treatment (p-value=0.001). The outcomes support those of Matos FZ et al., where the periodontal condition was exhibited in all individuals of groups with gingivitis (63.1%) and periodontitis (25%) (1). Periodontitis was most prevalent (25%) in Group-1 (individuals who had already completed the leprosy treatment).
Souza VA et al., examined leprosy individuals to diagnose roughly 80 to 88% of patients with periodontal disease and gingival bleeding in 92% of the patients, per the present study’s findings (19). Jacob Raja SA et al., evaluated leprosy patients’ oral and periodontal health (6). The study included 62 patients treated in a leprosy centre in the Dindigul district. The most common observation was gingival recession (54.8%), followed by tooth loss (69.5%), mobility (60.86%), attrition (56%), chronic pulpitis (34.7%), and dental caries (26%). A study by Rawlani SM et al., revealed that the prevalence of periodontal disease was 78.75% (22). Radiographic findings showed mean alveolar bone loss of approximately 5.6 mm in the maxilla and mandible, corroborating the above mentioned findings.
The majority of the patients had advanced periodontitis. Previous research by Marks Jr in 1978 demonstrated that resorption of alveolar bone in the anterior maxilla is a typical skeletal deformity of leprosy and likely causes local osteoclast activity (23). Findins of similar studies from the literature has been tabulated in (Table/Fig 17) (1),(6),(19),(20),(22).
All the compiled data point towards declining periodontal health with the disease advancement and the MDT treatment model. Dapsone, clofazimine, rifampicin, ofloxacin, and minocycline were frequently prescribed to these patients as part of the MDT suggested for treating leprosy. The patient also took steroids and anti-inflammatory medications in addition to these antibiotics for a long time. Dapsone therapy has been shown to be capable of causing patients’ hematopoietic changes (24). Thus, the presence of dental findings, including NCCLs, along with an increase in CAL, can be attributed to the adverse effects of the drugs. Oral health is said to be a reflection of systemic health. Poor oral hygiene weakened immunity paves the way for deviation in oral health and impacts an individual’s overall health. To prevent additional morbidity, leprosy patients should be educated about oral health issues and encouraged to practice good dental hygiene and also to improve the quality of life for those undergoing treatment.
Limitation(s)
It is important to note that the samples used in the current study were convenience samples gathered in context of specific centres in Vidarbha, Maharashtra. Hence, they may not be representative of the communities at large being researched. Furthermore, the current data’s non-random and cross-sectional qualities imply that the interpretation of the results should be limited to the groups examined at the time of this research. Given the size of the disease in relation to public health and the high incidence of the disease in India, the upper airways are the most important entryway for the bacillus and the oral and para-oral findings of broad disease beginning; leprosy is not mentioned frequently in dental literature on a longitudinal basis. As a result, when considering the current findings and conclusions, readers should approach with caution.
Conclusion
This study concludes that there was a correlation between declining oral health with the advancement of disease. The findings of the present study re-emphasise the presence of dental and periodontal findings in various stages of leprosy including caries, NCCLs and increased CAL. The increased attachment loss in treated patients can be supplemented to the drug therapy prescribed for leprosy. The key take home message for clinicians and public health professionals is to be more forthcoming with regard to the disease’s progression and the broader implications of disease and treatment approaches including early diagnosis along with the formulation of preventive and therapeutic treatment models, with vigilant screening of relevant findings to lessen the burden of disease.
Acknowledgement
The author acknowledges the help from the College Authority, leprosy centres, Departments and resources provided for this clinical research.
Author’s contribution: Author Madhumita conceptualised and gathered the data about this clinical research. Dr. Pavan put the necessary input was given towards the design of the manuscript. The authors discussed and finalised the final manuscript.
Reference
| 1. | Matos FZ, Aranha AMF, Borges ÁH, Pedro FLM, Raslan SA, Hamida F, et al. Can different stages of leprosy treatment influence the profile of oral health? Oral status in leprosy. Med Oral Patol Oral Cirugia Bucal. 2018;23(4):e376-83.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 2. | Katkar D, Mote BN, Adhav A, Muthuvel T, Kadam S. Epidemiological perspective of national leprosy eradication programme in Maharashtra: Focusing on “tribal hot-spot” of tribal district. Indian J Community Med Off Publ Indian Assoc Prev Soc Med. 2017;42(3):174-76.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 3. | Directorate General of Health Services. 2022. National Leprosy Eradication Programme. [online]. Available from: https://dghs.gov.in/content/1349_3_NationalLeprosyEradicationProgramme.aspx.
| 4. | Scheepers A. Correlation of oral surface temperatures and the lesions of leprosy. Int J Lepr Mycobact Dis Off Organ Int Lepr Assoc. 1998;66(2):214-17.
| 5. | Costa A, Nery J, Oliveira M, Cuzzi T, Silva M. Oral lesions in leprosy. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2003;69(6):381-85.
| 6. | Jacob Raja SA, Raja JJ, Vijayashree R, Priya BM, Anusuya GS, Ravishankar P. Evaluation of oral and periodontal status of leprosy patients in Dindigul district. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016;8(Suppl 1):S119-21.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Pardillo FEF, Fajardo TT, Abalos RM, Scollard D, Gelber RH. Methods for the classification of leprosy for treatment purposes. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2007;44(8):1096-99.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Vohra P, Rahman MSU, Subhada B, Tiwari RVC, Nabeel Althaf MS, Gahlawat M. Oral manifestation in leprosy: A cross-sectional study of 100 cases with literature review. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2019;8(11):3689-94.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Gupta B, Gupta S, Chaudhary M, Raj AT, Patil S. Oro-facial manifestations in lepromatous leprosy patients in Central India: Clinical findings from a cross-sectional study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(6):1981-86.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Govindasamy K, John AS, Lal V, Arif M, Solomon RM, Ghosal J, et al. A comparison of three types of targeted, community-based methods aimed at promoting early detection of new leprosy cases in rural parts of three endemic states in India. PloS One. 2021;16(12):e0261219.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Chaluvaraj R, Hiremath SS. Assessment of the oral health status and treatment needs of leprosy afflicted patients in central leprosorium and rehabilitation centres in Bangalore city. J Indian Assoc Public Health Dent. 2003;3(3):09-13.
| 12. | Organisation WH. Oral health surveys: Basic methods. World Health Organisation; 2013.
| 13. | Löe H. The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index systems. J Periodontol. 1967;38(6):610-16.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 14. | Mühlemann HR. Psychological and chemical mediators of gingival health. Rev Odontostomatol (Paris). 1977;6(5):352-57.
| 15. | Hefti AF. Periodontal probing. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 1997;8(3):336-56.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | Vandana KL, Gupta I. The location of cemento enamel junction for CAL measurement: A clinical crisis. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2009;13(1):12-15.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 17. | Bennett BH, Parker DL, Robson M. Leprosy: Steps along the journey of eradication. Public Health Rep. 2008;123(2):198-205.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Desikan K. Multi-drug regimen in leprosy and its impact on prevalence of the disease. Med J Armed Forces India. 2003;59(1):02-04.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 19. | Souza VA, Emmerich A, Coutinho EM, Freitas MG, Silva EH, Mercon FG, et al. Dental and oral condition in leprosy patients from Serra, Brazil. Lepr Rev. 2009;80(2):156-63.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | Gadge RS, Bajaj PS. Clinical evaluation of non-carious cervical lesions in lepromatous and tuberculoid leprosy. Med Sci. 2020;24(104):2460-66.
| 21. | Cunha-Cruz J, Scott J, Rothen M, Mancl L, Lawhorn T, Brossel K, et al. Salivary characteristics and dental caries: Evidence from general dental practices. J Am Dent Assoc. 2013;144(5):e31-40.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Rawlani SM, Rawlani S, Degwekar S, Bhowte RR, Motwani M. Oral health status and alveolar bone loss in treated leprosy patients of central India. Indian J Lepr. 2011;83(4):215-24.
| 23. | Marks Jr SC. The cellular basis for extremity bone loss in leprosy. Int J Lepr. 1979;47(1):26-32.
| 24. | Gupta B, Gupta S, Chaudhary M, Raj AT, Awan KH, Patil S. Hematological alterations in lepromatous leprosy: A cross-sectional observational study. Dis Mon. 2020;66(7):100919. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64907.18760
Date of Submission: Apr 21, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 05, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 31, 2023
Date of Publishing: Dec 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 2, 2023
• Manual Googling: Aug 17, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 26, 2023 (10%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
EMENDATIONS: 9
|