Year :
2023
| Month :
October
| Volume :
17
| Issue :
10
| Page :
ZD07 - ZD10
Full Version
A Simplified Technique to Treat Bimaxillary Protrusion using Micro-osteoperforation: A Case Report
Published: October 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/64358.18556
Anjali Sudhakar Kathade, Shruti Rathi, Rizwan Gilani, Ranjit Kamble
1. Postgraduate, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
2. Postgraduate, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
3. Reader, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
4. Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, Sharad Pawar Dental College, DMIMS, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anjali Sudhakar Kathade,
Postgraduate, Department of Orthodontics, Room No. 102, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Wardha-442001, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: anjalikathade001@gmail.com
Abstract
In Asian population, bimaxillary protrusion is a prevalent malocclusion characterised by protruding and proclined upper and lower incisors, as well as increased lip procumbence. A 25-year-old female patient presented with a chief complaint of forwardly placed teeth and bimaxillary protrusion and required fixed mechanotherapy with all four 1st premolar extractions. The patient also desired that the treatment be completed in a short period of time. Since sliding or loop mechanics alone take longer to close extraction spaces, authors chose Micro-osteoperforation (MOP), a minimally invasive procedure used to accelerate orthodontic tooth movement. MOP involves drilling or perforating distal to the canine for en-mass retraction, causing the alveolar bone to release inflammatory cells that accelerate tooth movement. This non invasive technique was used for the treatment. The average rate of tooth movement in each quadrant was 1.7 mm per month. Taking the procedure into account, the patient reported no side-effects during or after drilling, but mild discomfort was felt. The entire space closure took four months. At the end of space closure, a Class I molar and canine relationship was preserved with normal overbite and overjet, with very minimal anchorage loss on the molars. An extraoral improvement in profile from convex to straight was seen. The treatment was completed within 14 months. The novelty of MOP includes faster treatment times and less discomfort during orthodontic treatment. However, like any medical procedure, MOP does carry some risks, such as infection or damage to surrounding teeth or gums. It is important to discuss the risks and benefits of MOP with your orthodontist before deciding whether to undergo the procedure.
Keywords
Accelerated tooth movement, En-masse retraction, Non invasive
Case Report
A 25-year-old female patient presented to the Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics with a complaint of forwardly positioned anterior teeth. On extraoral examination, a convex profile and incompetent lips with facial symmetry were seen. Intraoral examination revealed proclined upper and lower anterior teeth, increased overjet of 6 mm, and a normal overbite of 2 mm. Class I canine and molar relations were observed on both sides (Table/Fig 1). The provisional diagnosis was Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion. After cephalometric analysis (Table/Fig 2),(Table/Fig 3), a final diagnosis of Class I malocclusion with bimaxillary protrusion was made, necessitating the extraction of the first premolars in both the upper and lower arch.
The treatment plan involved the extraction of the first premolars followed by space closure, which can be achieved through sliding mechanics, loop mechanics, or accelerated orthodontics. Due to the patient’s preference for a shorter treatment duration, accelerated orthodontics using Micro-osteoperforation (MOP) was chosen as the least invasive procedure.
Premolar extractions were done at the beginning of the therapy, followed by strapping the maxillary and mandibular arches with 0.022*0.028 slots (McLaughlin-Bennett-Trevisi MBT prescription). The first levelling and alignment wire used was a 0.016 inch long Nickel Titanium (NiTi) wire, followed by rectangles wires made of 0.016*0.022 and 0.019*0.025 NiTi. Stainless steel wires ranging from 0.019 to 0.025 inches were affixed to both arches to prepare for retraction.
Under local anaesthesia (2% lidocaine with 1:100000 epinephrine), the first two holes were made distally to the canines on the crestal bone, 5 mm and 8 mm apart, as indicated by the black arrows in (Table/Fig 4). MOPs were then performed using a bone screw measuring 1.6 mm in diameter and 3.0 mm in length, with the aid of an implant screwdriver device (Table/Fig 5). Canine retraction was continued using a NiTi coil spring exerting 200 g of force (Table/Fig 6).
Each quadrant saw an average tooth movement rate of 1.7 mm per month. The patient reported no side-effects during or after drilling, although some discomfort was felt during screw tightening (Table/Fig 7). The overall space closure was completed within four months, resulting in the maintenance of a Class I molar and canine relation was maintained with normal overbite, reduced overjet, and improved profile from convex to straight (Table/Fig 8). The treatment was completed in a total time span of 14 months.
As the patient was in the first trimester, radiographs were not taken. However, after a 6-month follow-up, no relapse was seen after the clinical evaluation.
Discussion
Accelerated orthodontics is a type of orthodontic treatment that aims to reduce the treatment time required to achieve desired orthodontic results. Traditional orthodontic treatment can take 18-24 months or longer. Accelerated orthodontics claims to achieve the same results in a significantly shorter time frame, usually ranging from 3-9 months. Accelerated orthodontic treatment is achieved by applying more force to the teeth than in traditional orthodontic treatment. This is done through the use of innovative orthodontic appliances, such as vibration devices or MOP, which help stimulate bone remodeling and accelerate tooth movement (1). While accelerated orthodontics may shorten treatment time, it may not be suitable for all patients. If a patient is a good candidate for accelerated orthodontic treatment, an orthodontist must perform a thorough evaluation (1).
Accelerated orthodontics is a type of orthodontic treatment that aims to speed up the movement of teeth into their proper position. There are several types of accelerated orthodontics, including:
• MOP
• Propel orthodontics
• Wilckodontics
• Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics
• AcceleDent (2),(3),(4).
Each type of accelerated orthodontics has its own benefits and drawbacks, and the best option will depend on the individual’s situation and preferences. MOP is a minimally invasive orthodontic procedure that involves creating small holes in the bone around the teeth using a specialised instrument. These tiny perforations, which are typically 1-2 mm in diameter and 3-4 mm deep, stimulate the bone to release certain chemicals that accelerate tooth movement (1),(2),(5).
During the MOP procedure, the orthodontist will first numb the area around the teeth with a local anaesthetic. Then, they will use a special instrument to create the perforations in the bone around the teeth. The procedure is usually quick, and most patients report feeling minimal discomfort. After the procedure, patients may experience some soreness or discomfort, but this usually resolves within a few days (6),(7). MOP is typically used in conjunction with other orthodontic treatments, such as braces or clear aligners, to speed up the movement of teeth into their proper position. The procedure can be performed on both adults and children, and it has been shown to be safe and effective in numerous studies (8).
The MOP is a minimally invasive procedure that involves creating tiny holes in the alveolar bone surrounding the teeth to stimulate bone remodeling and accelerate tooth movement (9). This technique has gained popularity in recent years as a way to reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment, improve patient comfort, and achieve better treatment outcomes. In the present discussion, authors will explore some of the key aspects of MOP and its risks and benefits (10). Alkebsi A et al., analysed the available evidence on the use of MOP in orthodontic treatment. The review found that MOP can significantly increase the rate of tooth movement and reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment (10).
Kundi I et al., a systematic review and meta-analysis published in the journal Progress in Orthodontics in 2020, analysed the results of 16 studies on the use of MOP in orthodontic treatment. The review found that MOP can significantly increase the rate of tooth movement and reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment (11). Overall, the available literature suggests that MOP can accelerate tooth movement and reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment. However, more high-quality research is needed to establish the long-term safety and efficacy of MOP, as well as the optimal protocol for its use in clinical practice (12).
One of the main advantages of MOP is its simplicity and ease of use. The procedure can be performed chairside in a matter of minutes using a handheld device that creates microperforations in the bone. The perforations are typically 1-2 mm in diameter and spaced 3-4 mm apart and can be placed around the teeth that require movement (5). The perforations create a localised inflammatory response that triggers the release of cytokines and growth factors, which in turn stimulate bone remodeling and tooth movement (9). This process can reduce the duration of orthodontic treatment by up to 50%, depending on the severity of the malocclusion and the desired treatment outcomes [5,11]. Another advantage of MOP is its safety profile. The procedure is minimally invasive and does not involve cutting or removing any tissue. The risk of infection or other complications is low, and patients typically experience little to no pain or discomfort (6). In addition, MOP can be used in conjunction with other orthodontic techniques, such as aligners or braces, to enhance their effectiveness and achieve more predictable treatment outcomes (1),(5),(12).
Despite these advantages, there are some limitations and potential drawbacks to MOP that should be considered. While the risk of these complications is low, they can occur in some cases, especially if the perforations are placed too close to the roots or if the teeth are already compromised. In the recent study, MOP did not speed up canine retraction, but they did appear to facilitate root movement (13),(14).
Hence, MOP is a promising technique that has the potential to revolutionise orthodontic treatment by reducing treatment time, improving patient comfort, and enhancing treatment outcomes (15). While there are some limitations and potential risks associated with this technique, the benefits appear to outweigh the drawbacks in most cases (16). Orthodontic practitioners should consider incorporating MOP into their treatment protocols as a way to improve the patient experience and achieve better treatment outcomes.
Conclusion
Among the defined invasive techniques for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement and treatment times, MOP stands out as a minimally invasive, easy-to-use, repeatable, and efficient new method that can eliminate some of the disadvantages of surgery. In the present case, MOP accelerated anterior retraction in bimaxillary protrusion cases and did not affect molar anchorage. Although it is reported that side-effects such as pain or root resorption are not observed due to MOP, long-term studies are required.
Reference
| 1. | Alikhani M, Alansari S, Sangsuwon C, Alikhani M, Chou MY, Alyami B, et al. Micro-osteoperforations: Minimally invasive accelerated tooth movement. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2015;21(3):162-69.
[ CrossRef] | 2. | Huang H, Williams RC, Kyrkanides S. Accelerated orthodontic tooth movement: Molecular mechanisms. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014;146(5):620-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.07.007. Epub 2014 Oct 28. PMID: 25439213.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 3. | Wilcko WM, Wilcko T, Bouquot JE, Ferguson DJ. Rapid orthodontics with alveolar reshaping: Two case reports of decrowding. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2001;21(1):09-19. PMID: 11829041.
| 4. | Zimmo N, Saleh MH, Mandelaris GA, Chan HL, Wang HL. Corticotomy-accelerated orthodontics: A comprehensive review and update. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017;38(1):17-25; quiz 26. PMID: 28054789.
| 5. | Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(5):639-48. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.06.017. PMID: 24182579.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Dos Santos CCO, Mecenas P, de Castro Aragón MLS, Normando D. Effects of micro-osteoperforations performed with Propel system on tooth movement, pain/quality of life, anchorage loss, and root resorption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prog Orthod. 2020;21(1):27. Doi: 10.1186/s40510-020-00326-4. PMID: 32715352; PMCID: PMC7383046.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Bahamid AA, AlHudaithi FS. Micro perforations in orthodontics: An answer to prolonged duration of orthodontic treatment-A. Annals of Dental Specialty. 2022;10(1):95.
[ CrossRef] | 8. | Sivarajan S, Ringgingon LP, Fayed MMS, Wey MC. The effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;157(3):290-304. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2019.10.009. PMID: 32115107.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Krishnan V, Davidovitch Z. Cellular, molecular, and tissue-level reactions to orthodontic force. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;129(4):469.e1-32. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.007. PMID: 16627171.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Alkebsi A, Al-Maaitah E, Al-Shorman H, Abu Alhaija E. Three-dimensional assessment of the effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement during canine retraction in adults with Class-II malocclusion: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018;153(6):771-85. Doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.11.026. PMID: 29853235.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Kundi I, Alam MK, Shaheed S. Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(1):15-20. Doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.05.009. Epub 2019 May 28. PMID: 31920274; PMCID: PMC6950836.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Al-Khalifa KS, Baeshen HA. Micro-osteoperforations and its effect on the rate of tooth movement: A systematic review. Eur J Dent. 2021;15(1):158-67. Doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713955. Epub 2020 Jul 1. PMID: 32610360; PMCID: PMC7902111.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Bajaj I, Garg AK, Gupta DK, Singla L. Comparative effect of micro-osteoperforation and Photo-biomodulation on the rate of maxillary canine retraction: A split mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Ter. 2022;173(1):39-45. Doi: 10.7417/CT.2022.2389. PMID: 35147645.
| 14. | Aboalnaga AA, Salah Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: A split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):21. Doi: 10.1186/s40510-019-0274-0. PMID: 31155698; PMCID: PMC6545296.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Cramer CL, Campbell PM, Opperman LA, Tadlock LP, Buschang PH. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on tooth movement and bone in the beagle maxilla. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2019;155(5):681-92. Doi: 10.1016/j. ajodo.2018.06.015. PMID: 31053284.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | Raghav P, Khera AK, Bhasin P. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on rate of space closure by mini-implant supported maxillary anterior en-masse retraction: A randomized clinical trial. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2021;11(2):185-91. Doi: 10.1016/j. jobcr.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 22. PMID: 33598396; PMCID: PMC7868723. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/64358.18556
Date of Submission: Apr 02, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 01, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 17, 2023
Date of Publishing: Oct 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 05, 2023
• Manual Googling: May 18, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 14, 2023 (9%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
EMENDATIONS: 8
|