Year :
2023
| Month :
August
| Volume :
17
| Issue :
8
| Page :
PC01 - PC04
Full Version
Effectiveness of Drainless versus Drained Onlay Mesh Hernioplasty in Patients Undergoing Elective Open Ventral Hernia Repair: A Prospective Interventional Study
Published: August 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/65106.18329
Lejeune Ramot Mahalakshmi, Sivamarieswaran Ramalingam, Manimaran Pethuraj
1. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
2. Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
3. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, Srm Medical College Hospital and Research Centre, Chengalpattu, Tamil Nadu, India.
Correspondence Address :
Sivamarieswaran Ramalingam,
No. 16 A, Meenambal Salai, Vivekananda Nagar, Kodungaiyur, Chennai-600118, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: dr.sivamarieswaran@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Ventral Hernia Repair (VHR) is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures worldwide. The two commonly used surgical techniques for ventral hernia are onlay and sublay repairs. The use of drains in hernioplasty is controversial, as some studies suggest an increased incidence of surgical site infections.
Aim: This study aims to compare the postoperative outcomes between patients who had drains placed and those who did not, undergoing elective open VHR.
Materials and Methods: A prospective interventional study was conducted at the Department of General Surgery, Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India. The study duration was one year, from September 2020 to September 2021. A total of 50 hernia patients participated, with 25 undergoing drainless and 25 undergoing drain onlay mesh hernioplasty. Surgical complications such as surgical site infection, seroma formation, and duration of hospital stay were observed and compared between the two groups. Independent t-tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare continuous and categorical variables, respectively.
Results: Out of 50 patients, 15 (60%) in the drain group were aged between 11 to 60 years, while 11 (44%) in the drainless group were aged between 18 to 40 years. Postoperative seroma was present in 6 (12%) patients, with an equal distribution in both groups (p-value >0.05). Surgical site infection was present in 3 (60%) and 2 (40%) patients in group A and group B, respectively (p-value >0.05). The mean duration of hospital stay was 6.36±1.89 and 4.92±1.91 days in group A and group B, respectively (p-value=0.010).
Conclusion: The presence or absence of a drain did not significantly affect the formation of seroma among the participants. The incidence of infection did not vary significantly with or without the use of a drain.
Keywords
Hernia repair, Hospital stay, Postoperative infection, Seroma
Introduction
Hernia is an abnormal protrusion of abdominal contents outside the abdominal cavity through an opening. “Ventral” hernias are those in which abdominal contents emerge from the anterior abdominal wall. The defect could be either natural or iatrogenic. Incisional hernias are the only iatrogenic abdominal hernias since they occur through a weak site of abdominal wall closure, immediately after surgery or years after it. This can lead to serious complications, including acute abdominal obstruction and a limited Quality of Life (QoL) (1),(2),(3),(4),(5). There are several risk factors that can increase the likelihood of developing a ventral hernia, including wound infection, the technique used for suturing, the presence of abdominal wall tension, abdominal aortic aneurysms, and connective tissue disorder. Other risk factors include Body Mass Index (BMI), gender, smoking, and co-morbid conditions (6),(7).
VHR is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures across the globe. The two surgical techniques most commonly employed in cases of ventral hernia are onlay and sublay repairs. Mesh is positioned on the fascia or beneath the rectus muscle for onlay and sublay treatments, and in the intraperitoneal layer for inlay procedures. During incisional hernia procedures, mesh is placed to bridge the defect using the inlay technique. The idea of placing a drain after incisional hernia surgery is controversial, with some studies suggesting an increased incidence of surgical site infections. Risks include obstruction, irritation, pain, breakage, and prolonged hospital stay, which increases the risk of skin flap necrosis, wound infection, and structural erosion (1),(8). Thus, the present study aimed to compare the change in postoperative outcomes between the placement of a drain and no placement of a drain among patients undergoing elective open VHR.
Material and Methods
A prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of General Surgery at Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute, Kelambakkam, Tamil Nadu, India. The study duration was one year, from September 2020 to September 2021. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee with letter number 121/IHEC/August 2020. Informed consent was obtained from all the patients who underwent the surgery during the study period.
Inclusion criteria: The study included patients between 18 and 80 years of age, of both genders, with umbilical, paraumbilical, or epigastric hernias, initially diagnosed through physical examination and confirmed by Ultrasound (USG).
Exclusion criteria: Patients with emergency situations such as strangulated hernia with signs of obstruction (abdominal distension, vomiting, and absolute constipation), those who lacked follow-up, had skin loss/infections or signs of inflammation at the hernia site, BMI greater than 35 kg/m2, multiple hernia defects, immune suppression, previous history of abdominal surgery within a year, stage IV malignancy as per the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) criteria, chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, alcoholic hepatitis, and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) III/IV were excluded from the study (9).
Study Procedure
Eligible patients who gave their consent were divided into two groups (group A and B) using simple random sampling. The Serially Numbered Opaque Sealed Envelope (SNOSE) approach was used to maintain allocation concealment (Table/Fig 1).
Demographic and medical details were documented. Preoperative assessments were conducted to evaluate the risks associated with surgery. This included a full blood count, liver function test, kidney function test, as well as radiographic tests such as abdominal ultrasound, chest X-ray, and Electrocardiogram (ECG). Demographic information, clinical presentation, duration, co-morbidities, defect dimensions, associated symptoms, intraoperative and postoperative complications, operating time, seroma formation, wound infection, and hospital stays were recorded. For patients who experienced chronic musculoskeletal pain, a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of 3.4 or lower indicated mild pain, 3.5 to 7.4 indicated moderate pain, and 7.5 or higher indicated severe pain. Group A received an onlay mesh drain with continuous closed suction implanted (Table/Fig 2), while group B had no drain and an abdominal belt fitted shortly after surgery (Table/Fig 3).
Statistical Analysis
The data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26.0. Continuous variables such as age, duration of surgery, anthropometric measurements (height, weight, BMI), length and width of the defect, and number of days stayed in the hospital were expressed as mean and Standard Deviation (SD). Categorical variables including age category, gender, occupation, presence of co-morbidities, addiction history (smoking, alcohol consumption), ASA PS, distribution of diagnosis, type of surgery performed, VAS score, wound gaping, signs of postoperative seroma, surgical site infection, and risk factors for seroma and infection were expressed as frequency and proportion (10). Independent sample t-test was used to compare two means. Chi-square test and Fisher’s exact test were employed to compare the distribution of qualitative variables between the groups. All test results were considered statistically significant if the p-value was <0.05.
Results
In group A (drain group), nearly 15 patients (60%) belonged to the age group ranging from 11 to 60 years, while in group B (drainless group), the majority of patients, 11 (44%), belonged to the age group ranging from 18 to 40 years. Both groups showed a female predominance, with 68% in group A and 80% in group B (Table/Fig 4). Diabetes, hypertension, and asthma were common co-morbidities observed in both groups. All 25 patients in group A had a previous history of surgery (Table/Fig 5). Around 10 patients (40%) in group A and 12 patients (48%) in group B underwent paraumblical and umbilical hernioplasty (Table/Fig 6). The mean duration of hospital stay was 6.36±1.89 days in group A and 4.92±1.91 days in group B (p-value=0.010). In group A, 56% of participants stayed in the hospital for more than five days, while in group B, it was 28% (Table/Fig 7).
Among the patients with seroma, 2 (33.3%) had a history of smoking, and among those with surgical site infection, 3 (60%) in group A and 2 (40%) in group B had a history of smoking, which was significant with a p-value of 0.009.
Discussion
Among all surgical procedures, open onlay mesh repair is one of the simplest and safest techniques learned by surgeons (11). However, it is known to have complications such as seroma formation and wound infection, which can prolong the duration of hospital stay (12). The occurrence of postoperative seroma was similar in both groups, suggesting that the placement of a drain did not have a significant effect in preventing seroma formation. This finding is supported by a study conducted by Soon PSH et al., where they also reported similar results (13). Luo Y et al., reported that keeping a drain and the occurrence of seroma were independent events (14). These complications occur due to injury to the blood and lymphatic systems during subcutaneous tissue dissection, which is part of the onlay technique’s preparation of a bed for the mesh, leading to seroma formation (15). He C et al., found that primary closure is the most promising strategy for preventing seroma formation, and other strategies include cauterisation of the hernia sac and injection of fibrin sealant. However, no evidence was found for the use of a drain to prevent seroma (16).
The distribution of surgical site infection was also similar between the groups, with similar signs such as redness, tenderness, and purulent discharge. However, these findings contradict a study conducted by Mujagic E et al., where they reported that the placement of drains increased the chance of surgical site infection (17). The present study found that smoking was the only modifiable risk factor associated with the occurrence of complications such as seroma and surgical site infection among the participants. Similar findings were reported by Wilson RB and Farooque Y, who identified obesity, tobacco use, and diabetes mellitus as major modifiable patient co-morbidities associated with postoperative surgical site infection in hernia surgery (18).
Shekhar H et al., found that 2% of onlay mesh-repaired cases experienced recurrence and 4% experienced local wound infection after one month of follow-up (19). Onlay mesh repair was also associated with an infection rate ranging from 5% to 75% (mean value 33.5%), as reported by Timmermans L et al., (20). Regarding the duration of hospital stay, the present study found that the placement of drains significantly increased the duration of hospital stay compared to non-placement of drains. Similar results were obtained by Luo Y et al., who reported a positive association between the presence of a drain and increased duration of hospital stay (14). This could be due to the additional procedures associated with drain placement. Prolonged hospital stay not only places a burden on manpower and increases healthcare costs but may also impair the ability of the patient to return to routine activities. Therefore, keeping a drain prolonged the duration of hospital stay and was not found to be useful in preventing seroma or surgical site infection.
Limitation(s)
The results of the present study may not be generalisable due to its single-centre nature and the short duration of follow-up.
Conclusion
The development of seromas was not influenced by whether or not a drain was present, and infection rates were similar regardless of drain usage. Hospital stays were significantly shorter when drains were not used. It is possible to reduce postoperative pain, psychological stress, and promote postoperative recovery without the use of drains by employing techniques such as quilting sutures and abdominal binder belts.
Reference
| 1. | Gurusamy KS, Allen VB. Wound drains after incisional hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(12):CD005570.
[ CrossRef] | 2. | Mannan Khan Rao A. Ventral hernia: Causes and management. Hernia Surgery. IntechOpen. 2019;01-12.
[ CrossRef] | 3. | Santora TA, Roslyn JJ. Incisional hernia. Surg Clin North Am [Internet]. 1993;73(3):557-70. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(16) 46037-8.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 4. | Singla S, Samuvel D, Pramod Philip N, Pramod J. Case report spectrum of abdominal wall hernias and role of CT in their management. An Online Int J. Available [Internet]. 2013;2(2):64-70. Available from: http://www.cibtech.org/jcr.htm.
| 5. | Kashyap AS, Anand KP, Kashyap S. Inguinal and incisional hernias. Lancet. 2004;363(9402):84.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Den Hartog D, Dur AH, Tuinebreijer WE, Kreis RW. Open surgical procedures for incisional hernias. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(3):CD006438.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Itatsu K, Yokoyama Y, Sugawara G, Kubota H, Tojima Y, Kurumiya Y, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(11):1439-47.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Faridoon S, Shah M, Iftikhar M, Ahmad S, Aslam R, Hadi A, et al. Comparison of the outcome of drain vs pressure dressing in ventral hernia repair. J Gandhara Med Dent Sci. 2021;8(3):03. Doi: https://doi.org/10.37762/jgmds.8-3.187.
[ CrossRef] | 9. | Daabiss M. American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification. Indian J Anaesth. 2011;55(2):111-15. Doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79879. PMID: 21712864; PMCID: PMC3106380.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Boonstra AM, Preuper HRS, Balk GA, Stewart RE. Cut-off points for mild, moderate, and severe pain on the visual analogue scale for pain in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. PAIN®. 2014;155(12):2545-50. ISSN 0304-3959, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2014.09.014.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Berger RL, Li LT, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Kao LS, Liang MK. Development and validation of a risk specification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair. J Am Coll Surg. 2013;217(6):974-82.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Nguyen MT, Berger RL, Hicks SC, Davila JA, Li LT, Kao LS, et al. Comparison of outcomes of synthetic mesh vs suture repair of elective primary ventral hernianiorrhaphy: A systemic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(5):415-21.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Soon PSH, Clark J, Magarey CJ. Seroma formation after axillary lymphadenectomy with and without the use of drains. Breast. 2005;14(2):103-07.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 14. | Luo Y, Mohammed Jinnaah S, Masood D, Hodgson R. Drain tube use in incisional hernia repair: Anational survey. Hernia [Internet]. 2021;25(2):427-33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-019-02115-3.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Westphalen AP, Araujo AC, Zacharias P, Rodrigues ES, Fracaro GB, Lopes-Filho GD. Repair of large incisional hernias: To drain or not to drain- randomize clinical trial. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira. 2015;30(12):844-51.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | He C, Lu J, Ong MW, Lee DJK, Tan KY, Chia CLK. Seroma prevention strategies in laproscopic ventral hernia repair: Asystematic review. Hernia. 2020;24(4):717-31.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 17. | Mujagic E, Zeindler J, Coslovsky M, Hoffmann H, Soysal SD, Mechera R, et al. The association of surgical drains with surgical site infections-A prospective observational study. Am J Surg [Internet]. 2019;217(1):17.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Wilson RB, Farooque Y. Risks and prevention of surgical site infection after hernia mesh repair and the predictive utility of ACS-NSQIP. J Gastrointest Surg. 2022;26(4):950-64. Doi: 10.1007/s11605-022-05248-6. Epub 2022 Jan 21. Erratum in: J Gastrointest Surg. 2023;27(1):211. PMID: 35064459; PMCID: PMC9021144.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 19. | Shekhar H, Jindal R, Mukherjee S, Sharan J. Open onlay versus sublay mesh repair in ventral hernias- A comparative study. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology. 2021;6(1):A74-A77.
| 20. | Timmermans L, de Goede B, van Dijk SM, Kleinrensink GJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Meta-analysis of sublay versus onlay mesh repair in incisional hernia surgery. Am J Surg. 2014;207:980-88. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/65106.18329
Date of Submission: Apr 29, 2023
Date of Peer Review: May 30, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jul 11, 2023
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jun 16, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jul 08, 2023 (8%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
EMENDATIONS: 6
|