Year :
2022
| Month :
November
| Volume :
16
| Issue :
11
| Page :
AC01 - AC05
Full Version
A Cross-sectional Observational Study on Distal Femoral Morphometry in West-central Maharashtra, India
Published: November 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/59749.17006
Anil Kumar Dwivedi, Niyati Airan, Rajan Bhatnagar
1. Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.
2. Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Srinagar Garhwal, Uttarakhand, India.
3. Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences, Vibhuti Khand, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Anil Kumar Dwivedi,
Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Veer Chandra Singh Garhwali
Government Institute of Medical Science and Research, Srinagar, Garhwal-246174, Uttarakhand, India.
E-mail: dranildwivedi2009@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Femur or thigh bone is the longest bone of the human skeleton. The lower end of the femur articulates with the tibia to form the knee joint. Femur shows morphometric variations in relation to geography, race, ethnic group, and gender.
Aim: To measure various dimensions of the lower end of the femur in West-central Maharashtra, India.
Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India from May 2010 to May 2013 on 280 adult dried femora (136 Right and 144 Left). The lower ends of the femora were evaluated for bicondylar width (BCW), anteroposterior diameter of both medial and lateral condyles, the transverse diameter of both medial and lateral condyles, intercondylar notch width, notch width index, and femoral aspect ratio. All the measurements of the right and left femur were obtained by Vernier caliper and recorded separately. The data was analysed statistically using student’s t-test. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The mean bicondylar width for the right and left-side were 72.83±5.09 mm and 71.83±5.65 mm, respectively. Medial condyle anteroposterior diameter (MCAPD) for right and left femur were 56.99±3.79 mm and 55.20±4.35 mm. Lateral condyle anteroposterior diameter (LCAPD) for right and left femur were 57.48±4.96 mm and 56.37±4.55 mm. Medial condyle transverse diameter (MCTD) for right and left-side were 23.68±2.68 mm and 23.63±2.40 mm. Lateral condyle transverse diameter (LCTD) for right and left-side were 25.26±2.56 mm and 25.24±2.62 mm. Intercondylar notch width (ICNW) for right and left-side were 21.06±2.45 mm and 21.00±2.62 mm. Notch width index for right and left femur were 0.29±0.03 and 0.29±0.03. The Femoral Aspect Ratio (FAR) for right and left-side was 1.27±0.07 and 1.28±0.05, respectively. In this study, there were no statistically significant differences between values of right and left-sides except, medial condyle anteroposterior diameter showed a statistically significant difference between the two sides (p=0.0002).
Conclusion: The morphometric data collected from the lower end of the femur indicated ethnic variations with a different populations in India and abroad. Values obtained in the present study were less than the dimensions of commonly available femoral implants because the design of most of these implants is based on dimensions of foreign populations, indicating size mismatch. These data will aid in the decision-making and implant design, suitable for local population.
Keywords
Bone, Femur, Implants, Knee joint, Osteoarthritis, Prosthesis, Tibia
Introduction
The femur is the longest and most proximal bone of the lower limb. Its rounded, smooth head form a hip joint with an acetabulum. The medial and lateral condyles present in the distal expanded end of the femur articulate with condyles of the tibia to form the knee joint (1). Anteriorly, the femoral condyles are separated by smooth articular patellar surfaces. Posteriorly, the condyles are much more prominent and are separated by a deep intercondylar notch (2),(3). The morphometric measurements of the femoral condyles show regional variations among populations and these variations are related to genetic and environmental factors. Variations in the human skeletal measurements determine the racial characteristics of the populations (4).
The morphometric data of lower end of femur has an important role in medicolegal cases and identification of sex. The measurements are used for decision making during total knee arthroplasty (5). Quantitative knowledge of the various parameters of distal femoral end are critical for understanding the biomechanics of the knee joint (6),(7). Morphometry of the distal femur is also helpful for understanding knee joint functioning (6),(8), total knee arthroplasty and surgical navigation (9),(10).
An important factor for long-term success of total knee arthroplasty is good shape and size match between the prosthesis and resected surface of the joint (11). A lot of studies had suggested that the same kind of prosthesis is not suitable for different population (10),(11). It is important to obtain morphometric data to achieve best stability and longevity of implant (12),(13). The use of an undersized component may result in implant loosening, oversized component may lead to neighbouring soft tissues impingement. The use of appropriate component size is therefore pivotal to produce long-term outcome following total knee arthroplasty (14),(15),(16).
As far as authors are aware, there is no work carried out with this number of samples for measurement of such a large number of dimensions of lower end of femur. Thus, the present study was planned to measure various dimensions of distal end of femur in West-central region of Maharashtra who’s built, physique, habits, genetic makeup and personal life styles are different from that of other population. This information can then be used in the designing and development of implants suited for local population as well as assisting in decision-making during clinical practices (17),(18).
Material and Methods
A cross-sectional observational study was conducted from May 2010 to May 2013 on 280 adult dried femora 136 (Right and 144 Left) available in the Department of Anatomy of three Government Medical Colleges located in West-central region of Maharashtra. Prior approval of Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC) was taken.
Inclusion criteria: All the selected femora were free of damage or deformity and fully ossified indicating adult bones. Each and every femur used in the present study were prepared in the department from dissected cadavers obtained from local population. The gender of the bone was not taken into account.
Exclusion criteria: Femora with grossly deformed appearance and pathological changes (fractures, osteophytes, osteoarthritic changes and post mortem damage) were excluded from the study.
Study Procedure
The side of the femora was determined by standard Anatomical procedures. Sliding Vernier calliper was used for taking measurements. All measurements were recorded by single observer for consistency. The measurements were repeated thrice and mean value was taken to minimise error during measurements. The values were recorded in millimetre.
The BCW was measured as maximum distance between medial and lateral epicondyle in transverse plane (Table/Fig 1)a (19),(20). MCAPD was measured as maximum distance between anterior and posterior surface of medial condyle (Table/Fig 1)b (19). LCAPD was taken as maximum distance between anterior and posterior surface of lateral condyle (Table/Fig 1)c (21),(22). MCTD was measured as maximum distance between medial and lateral surface of medial condyle (Table/Fig 1)d (19). LCTD was taken as maximum distance between medial and lateral surface of lateral condyle (Table/Fig 2)a (23). ICNW was measured as maximum distance between medial and lateral surface of intercondylar notch posteriorly (Table/Fig 2)b (17),(19),(24). The intercondylar Notch Width Index (NWI) was calculated by dividing intercondylar Notch Width (ICNW) by Bicondylar Width (BCW), the NWI was derived as xy/MN (Table/Fig 2)c (25). The FAR was calculated by dividing the Bicondylar Width [BCW] with Lateral Condyle Anterior Posterior Diameter [LCAPD], The FAR was derived as MN/KL (Table/Fig 2)d (26),(27),(28).
Statistical Analysis
All the measurements were tabulated and analysed statistically using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 19.0. Mean and standard deviation for right and left femur was recorded separately. All measurements were rounded to two decimal places. Independent sample t-test was used to find out the differences in the parameters of right and left femur. The p-value <0.05 was considered as significant.
Results
Out of 280 adult dry femur bones, 136 femora belong to right-side and 144 femora to the left-side. Mean anterior posterior diameter of medial condyle was 56.99±3.79 mm on right-side and 55.20±4.35 mm on the left-side. There were no significant differences in various parameters studied in right and left-side (p>0.05) except anterior posterior distance of medial condyle, in which right-side was significantly greater than the left-side (p<0.05) (Table/Fig 3).
When dimensions of all femoral specimens were considered, the mean bicondylar width 72.31±5.40 was obtained. MCAPD and LCAPD were 56.07±4.18 and 56.91±4.78, respectively. MCTD, LCTD and ICNW were 23.65±2.53, 25.25±2.59 and 21.03±2.53, respectively. Calculated mean NWI was 0.29±0.03 and FAR was 1.27±0.06 (Table/Fig 4).
Discussion
The morphology of femoral condyles and intercondylar notch play an important role in determining stability of knee joint. Knee joint arthroplasty has gained special position in the management of degenerative diseases of knee joints. Morphometrically matching prosthesis plays a vital role in successful knee arthroplasty (29),(30). The anthropometric data of lower end of femur are very important in designing and selection of proper fitting knee implants. In the present study, values of right and left-side femur were similar (p>0.05) except anterior posterior distance of medial condyle, in which right-side was significantly greater than the left-side (p<0.05). Rajan M and Ramachandran K reported statistically significant difference (p<0.05) in lateral condyle anterior posterior diameter of right and left-side in (right-58.52±3.44, left 56.92±3.4) (31). Eboh DEO and Igbinedion EN reported statistically significant (p<0.05) bilateral difference in bicondylar width (medial lateral width) of lower end of femur (right- 70.6±8.0, left- 77.0±5.7) (28). Biswas A and Bhattacharya S observed statistically significant (p<0.05) bilateral variation in medial condyle transverse diameter (right-25.48±2.05, left-27.28±2.29) and intercondylar notch width (right-20.86±2.52, left-19.43±2.57). Devi YE et al., (19), Sivaramalingam S and Gunasekaran SK (33), Vinay G and Vikram S, Terzidis I et al., (7), Ameet KJ and Murlimanju BV (16) and Attada PVK (25) has reported statistically no significant bilateral difference (p>0.05) in parameters of lower end of femur.
In the present study, average bicondylar width was found to be 72.83±5.09 on right-side and 71.83±5.65 on left-side, similar results were obtained by Biswas A and Bhattacharya S (32), Attada PVK (25), Vinay G and Vikram S (22), Rajan M and Ramachandran K (31) in Indian population (Table/Fig 5) and Eboh and Igbinedion EN (28) in foreign population (Table/Fig 6). The values in the study conducted by Zalawadia AZ et al., (34), Sivaramalingam and Gunasekaran SK (33), Devi YE et al., (19) in Indian population and Wada M et al., (35), Rosenstein AD et al., (36) in foreign population was found to be higher than present study (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6). Not only were present study measurements were smaller than foreign population, but they were also smaller than those of Indian subpopulations. As a result, present study population was significantly at risk for implant overhang and its related complication. The requirement for better fitting implants is vital to guarantee long-term success in total knee arthroplasty.
The use of an implant, that is too large in the anterior posterior dimension may result in patellofemoral overstuffing. Preparation of a distal femur for an undersized anterior posterior component may result in significant notching with associated increased risk of fractures around prosthesis (37),(38). Except for the study by Devi YE et al., (19), the majority of the measurements of the anterior posterior diameter of the medial and lateral condyles on the Indian population were in agreement with the present study. In foreign population Eboh and Igbinedion EN (28), Lakati KC et al., (26), Ewe TW et al., (27) and Rosenstein AD et al., (36) reported higher values than present study.
Rajan M and Ramachandran K (31), Devi YE et al., (19), Chawre HK et al., (17) reported values of transverse diameter of medial and lateral condyle similar to present study, whereas Sivaramalingam S and Gunasekaran SK (33), Vinay G and Vikram S (22), Zalawadia AZ et al., (34), Biswas A and Bhattacharya S (32) reported higher values for condyles. Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) tears are extremely common in athletes (37). The size and shape of femoral intercondylar notch and its relationship with cruciate ligament needs to be considered as important influence on predisposition for ACL injury (39). Patients with ACL tear have relatively greater depth of the femoral condyle compared with patient with normal ACL (40). Rajan M and Ramachandran K (31), Sivaramalingam S and Gunasekaran SK (33), Vinay G and Vikram S (22), Zalawadia AZ et al., (34) reported similar values of intercondylar notch width in Indian population (Table/Fig 5). Eboh and Igbinedion EN (28), Lakati KC et al., (26), Didia BC et al., (37) reported higher values of intercondylar notch width in foreign population (Table/Fig 6).
Femoral notch width index was calculated by dividing intercondylar notch width by bicondylar width. A small NWI has been reported as a predictive factor for anterior cruciate ligament injury and implicated in the higher incidence of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes (39). Attada PVK (25) in Indian population and Wada M et al., (35) in foreign population reported smaller values of notch width index than present study (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6).
The femoral aspect ratio shows a higher ratio for smaller knees and proportionally lower ratio for larger knees. Risk of implant overhang and its associated complication are significant in population having smaller knees (27). Eboh and Igbinedion EN (28), Lakati KC et al., (26), Ewe TW et al., (27) reported lower values of femoral aspect ratio in foreign population than present study (Table/Fig 6).
Implants for the replacement of the diseased knee joint were mostly developed by European and American manufacturers, using the morphology of their respective population. These implants come in different sizes to suit the various sizes of their population (6),(30). Because of relatively small built size of our population, local surgeons have a fewer choice of size available for implantation (Table/Fig 7), (Table/Fig 8). Knee dimensions in present study were much smaller than their western counterparts. The mean bicondylar width in the present study was 72.31 mm, which was comparatively smaller than those reported in Western population. Therefore, the risk of implant overhang and its associated complications are more in our population.
Limitation(s)
The current study was conducted on only 280 bones and did not make comparisons based on sex. Furthermore, large studies involving multiple bones in different parts of Maharashtra, taking into account sex-based comparisons and integrating radiological modalities, will improve the applicability of the study.
Conclusion
Present study illustrates the dimensions of the distal femur in population of West-central Maharashtra. The resulting values indicate ethnic differences between different population groups. The data can help in designing suitable implant for local population, choosing correct implants based on ethnic specification will reduce mismatch and improve postoperative outcome.
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to acknowledge the Head of Department of Anatomy of BJ Medical College Pune and GMC Aurangabad for support during data collection. Authors extend their heartfelt thanks to all faculty of Department of Anatomy of AFMC Pune for their constant support and valuable guidance.
Reference
| 1. | Standring S, Borley NR, Collins P, Crossman AR, Gatzoulis MA, Healy JC, et al. editors. Gray’s Anatomy The Anatomical Basis of Clinical practice. London: Churchill livingstone Elsevier; 2008.
| 2. | Sinnatamby C, editor. Last’s Anatomy Regional and Applied. 12th ed. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2011.
| 3. | Snell RS. Clinical Anatomy by Regions. 9th ed: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011; p. 754.
| 4. | Mishra AK, Chalise P, Singh RP, Shah RK. The proximal femur-A second look at rational of implant design. Nepal Medical College Journal. 2009;11(4):278-80.
| 5. | Yazar F, Imre N, Battal B, Bilgic S, Tayfun C. Is there any relation between distal parameters of the femur and its height and width? Surg Radiol Anat. 2012;34(2):125-32. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0847-1. PMID: 21739247.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Chen HS, Bin TY, Huang C, Lee JN, Kung HK. The critical dimension definition of femoral for custom-made total knee arthroplasty by the application of geometric modeling. Life Sci J. 2012;9(2):196-201.
| 7. | Terzidis I, Totlis T, Papathanasiou E, Sideridis A, Vlasis K, Natsis K. Gender and side-to-side differences of femoral condyles morphology: Osteometric data from 360 caucasian dried femori. Anat Res Int. 2012:01-06. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/679658.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Sushanth NK, Lakshmikantha BM, Sharieff JH. A study on dimensions of condyles and intercondylar region of femur in wayanad population. Indian J Anat. 2017;6(4):429-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21088/ija.2320.0022.6417.2.
[ CrossRef] | 9. | Al-Riheymee AHA. Intra-operative measurements of the distal femur geometry during total knee replacement and differences between male and female in Arab population. Muscat: University of Seychelles; 2012. INTRA-OPERATIVE%20%20MEASURMENTS%20%20OF%20THE.pdf.
| 10. | Urabe K, Mahoney OM, Mabuchi K, Itoman M. Morphologic differences of the distal femur between Caucasian and Japanese women. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery. 2008;16(3):312-15. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900801600309. PMID: 19126897.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Wei-Pin H, Cheng-Kung C, Jiann-Jong L. Morphometrical measurements of resected surface of femurs in Chinese knees: Correlation to the sizing of current femoral implants. The Knee 2006;13:12-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee. 2005.05.002. PMID: 16122927.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Westrich GH, Haas SB, Insall JN, Frachie A. Resection specimen analysis of proximal tibial anatomy based on 100 total knee arthroplasty specimens. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1995;10(1):47-51. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(06)80064-1.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Changa CM, Wu WT, Liu KL, Yeh KT, Peng CH, Chen IH. An anatomical study of the proximal aspect of the medial femoral condyle to define the proximal distal condylar length. Tzu Chi Medical Journal. 2017;29(2):104-08.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 14. | Hussain F, Kadir MRA, Zulkifly AH, Sa’at A, Aziz AA, Hossain MG, et al. Anthropometric measurements of the human distal femur: A study of the adult malay population. Bio Med Res Int. 2013:01-05. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/175056. PMID: 24294597.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Guy SP, Farndon MA, Sidhom S, Al-Lami M, Bennett C, London NJ. Gender differences in distal femoral morphology and the role of gender specific implants in total knee replacement: A prospective clinical study. The Knee. 2012;19:28-31. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.12.005. PMID: 21277212.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | Ameet KJ, Murlimanju BV. A morphometric analysis of intercondylar notch of femur with emphasis on its clinical implications. Med and Health. 2014;9(2):103-08.
| 17. | Chawre HK, Parmar AS, Khanwalkar PG. Study of distal femoral anthropometry in the population of Eastern Madhya Pradesh, India. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2018;6(4):1179-83. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18535/jmscr/v6i4.191.
[ CrossRef] | 18. | Mistri S, Majumdar S, Biswas S. Morphometric study of some lower femoral anatomy in Eastern Indian population. Indian J Basic App Med Res. 2014;3(4):182-90.
| 19. | Devi YE, Thounaojam O, Gangte D. Study of morphometric analysis of distal end of femur in the North Indian Population. Sch J App Med Sci. 2022;10(1):157-61. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36347/sjams.2022.v10i01.026.
[ CrossRef] | 20. | Shah DS, Ghyar R, Ravi B, Hegde C, Shetty V. Morphological measurements of knee joints in Indian population: Comparison to current knee prostheses. Open J Rheumatol Autoimmune Dis. 2014;4:75-85. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/ojra.2014.42012.
[ CrossRef] | 21. | Rashid S, Ahmad T, Saleem A, Gupta S, Jan S. Morphometric study of distal end of femur in Indian population. Int J Adv Res. 2018;6(6):662-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/7259.
[ CrossRef] | 22. | Vinay G, Vikram S. A study of morphometric analysis of distal end of femur and its clinical importance. IP Indian J Anat Surg Head Neck Brain. 2019;5(4):114-17.
[ CrossRef] | 23. | Neelima P, Sunder RR, Bindu AH. A study on morphometric measurements of adult dried femora in visakhapatnam. Int J Adv Res. 2016;4(8):564-67. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/1248.
[ CrossRef] | 24. | Chaurasia A, Tyagi A, Santoshi JA, Chaware P, Rathinam BA. Morphologic features of the distal femur and proximal tibia: A cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2021;13(1):02-10. Doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12907. PMID: 33654592.
[ CrossRef] | 25. | Attada PVK. A morphometric study of intercondylar notch of femur and its clinical significance. Academia Anatomica International. 2018;4(2):10-14. Doi: https://doi.org/10.21276/aanat.2018.4.2.4.
[ CrossRef] | 26. | Lakati KC, Ndeleva BM, Sokobe VB. Anthropometry of the distal femur in a kenyan population and its correlation with total knee replacement implants. East African Orthopaedic Journal. 2017;11:67-72.
| 27. | Ewe TW, Ang HL, Chee E, Ng WM. An analysis of the relationship between the morphometry of the distal femur, and total knee arthroplasty implant design. Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal. 2009;3(2):24-29. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5704/MOJ.0911.005.
[ CrossRef] | 28. | Eboh DEO, Igbinedion EN. Morphometry of the distal femur in a south-south nigerian population. Malaysian J Med Health Sci. 2020;16(4):197-201.
| 29. | Mistri S. A study of femoral condylar morphometry. Indian J Basic App Med Res. 2015;4(4):500-10.
| 30. | Moghtadaei M, Moghimi J, Shahhoseini G. Distal femur morphology of Iranian population and correlation with current prostheses. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016;18(2):01-06. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.21818. PMID:27186388.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 31. | Rajan M, Ramachandran K. Morphometric analysis of lower end of adult dry femur in south Indian population-A cross-sectional observational study and its clinical significance. Biomed. 2020;40(2):128-33.
| 32. | Biswas A, Bhattacharya S. A morphometric and radiological study of the distal end of femur in West Bengal population. Ital J Anat Embryol. 2017;122(1):39-48.
| 33. | Sivaramalingam S, Gunasekaran SK. Morphometric analysis of lower end of femur and its clinical significance. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2020;7(35):1844-48. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18410/jebmh/2020/383.
[ CrossRef] | 34. | Zalawadia AZ, Parekh DH, Patel SM. Morphometric study of lower end of dry femur in gujarat region and its clinical implication. Int J Anat Res. 2017;5(4.2):4595-99. Doi: https://doi.org/10.16965/ijar.2017.406.
[ CrossRef] | 35. | Wada M, Tatsuo H, Baba H, Asamoto K, Nojyo Y. Femoral intercondylar notch measurements in osteoartritic knees. British Society for Rheumatology. 1999;38:554-58. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/38.6.554. PMID: 10402077.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 36. | Rosenstein AD, Veazey B, Shephard D, Xu KT. Gender differences in the distal femur dimensions and variation patterns in relation to TKA component sizing. Orthopedics. 2008;31(7):652. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20110505-18.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 37. | Didia BC, Nwajagu GN, Dapper DV. Femoral intercondylar notch (lCN) width in Nigerians:Its relationship to Femur length. WAJM. 2002;21(4):265-68. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/wajm.v21i4.27966. PMID: 12665259.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 38. | Fana L, Xua T, Lib X, Zana P, Lia G. Morphologic features of the distal femur and tibia plateau in Southeastern Chinese population A cross-sectional study. Medicine. 2017;96(46):01-05. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000008524. PMID: 29145256.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 39. | Teitz CC, Lind BK, Sacks BM. Symmetry of the femoral notch width index. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. 1997;25(5):687-90. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/036354659702500517. PMID: 9302477.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 40. | Hoteya K, Kato Y, Motojima S, Ingham SJ, Horaguchi T, Saito A, et al. Association between intercondylar notch narrowing and bilateral anterior cruciate ligament injuries in athletes. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131:371-76. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-010-1254-5. PMID: 21246376. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/59749.17006
Date of Submission: Aug 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Sep 12, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Sep 30, 2022
Date of Publishing: Nov 01, 2022
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 29, 2022
• Manual Googling: Sep 27, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Sep 28, 2022 (14%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|