Year :
2021
| Month :
July
| Volume :
15
| Issue :
7
| Page :
DC19 - DC21
Full Version
Reduced Daptomycin Susceptibility in Clinical MRSA Isolates Showing Vancomycin MIC Creep Phenomenon
Published: July 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/48874.15087
Ketaki Vyankatesh Kulkarni, Niranjan Pathak, Sandhya Sadanand Kulkarni
1. Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Symbiosis International (Deemed University) Symbiosis Medical College for Women, Lavale, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
2. Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, PCMC’s PGI and YCM Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
3. Professor and Head, Department of Microbiology, Maharashtra Institute of Medical Education and Research Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Niranjan Pathak,
Associate Professor, Department of General Medicine, PCMC’s PGI and YCM Hospital, Pimpri, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: drketaki205@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Infections caused by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) are associated with increased morbidity, longer antimicrobial therapy, etc. First option for treating invasive MRSA infections is glycopeptide vancomycin. Daptomycin, a lipopeptide rapidly bactericidal invitro against MRSA, is an acceptable alternative.
Aim: To identify MRSA isolates from clinical specimens and assess their vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibility pattern.
Materials and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of six months (January to June 2019) on 90 clinical samples in a rural teaching hospital in Pune, Maharashtra, India, including all samples except sputum received in the Microbiology laboratory. MRSA isolates were tested for vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibility by Epsilometer (E) test Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) method. Data analysis was done using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 16.0 software.
Results: Among 90 MRSA isolates, most were from pus 51 (56.7%) followed by urine 23 (25.5%), blood 9 (10%), followed by miscellaneous samples 7 (7.7%). All MRSA isolates in this study were susceptible to daptomycin with MIC in the range of 0.25-1 μg/mL with maximum isolates (39) with MIC of 0.38 μg/mL. Vancomycin MIC creep phenomenon was observed in 68 isolates. All these isolates also showed reduced susceptibility to daptomycin.
Conclusion: MRSA in hospital set up mandates strict infection control practices in place. Daptomycin can be a good therapeutic alternative to treat infections caused by MRSA keeping in mind its therapeutic limitations and prior vancomycin usage in the same patient. Empirical therapy should always be based on antibiogram pattern. Adherence to hospital antibiotic policy and constant surveillance of antimicrobial resistance is the need of the hour.
Keywords
Empirical therapy, Epsilometer test, Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Minimum inhibitory concentration
Introduction
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is one of the most common pathogens causing severe infections. Infections caused by MRSA are associated with increased morbidity, longer antimicrobial therapy, increased healthcare costs, prolonged hospital stay and increased risk of death (1). The first option for treating invasive MRSA infections is glycopeptide vancomycin, which continues to be the reference standard approach (2). Use of vancomycin has been increasing since the mid-1980s, which results in the emergence of MRSA with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin (3). Vancomycin MIC creep phenomenon is described as increase in the MIC of vancomycin for a particular isolate though within the susceptible range (1),(4).
Linezolid has a broad spectrum of activity against gram positive bacteria including multiple drug resistant isolates. Linezolid is a bacteriostatic agent which inhibits bacterial protein synthesis by binding to the 50s ribosomal subunit near to the interface with the 30s subunit, causing inhibition of 70S initiation complex formation (5). Daptomycin is a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic that is bactericidal, invitro against a broad spectrum of gram positive bacteria, including MRSA. Current published evidence suggests that daptomycin may be an acceptable alternative to vancomycin for MRSA infections, especially MRSA bacteremia involving isolates with vancomycin MIC values of 1.5 to 2 μg/mL (6).
Daptomycin was found to be at par with the standard antimicrobial therapy used currently and hence was approved in a dose of 4 mg/kg for treating complicated skin and soft tissue infections and at a dose of 6 mg/kg for treating S. aureus bacteremia and right-sided endocarditis. Clinical observations have showed that daptomycin can be a treatment option for gram positive bone and joint infections. Even the multidrug-resistant gram positive microorganisms have demonstrated high daptomycin susceptibility as stated in a few large international studies. Thus, the possible indication for the use of daptomycin may be in the treatment of infections caused by drug resistant gram positive cocci (7).
The activity of daptomycin is strictly dependent on the physiological levels of calcium ions, which induce conformational changes in daptomycin (8),(9). These conformational changes are believed to increase the exposure of hydrophobic moieties in daptomycin molecule which in turn expedite daptomycin oligomerisation and membrane insertion (9),(10),(11). Also, daptomycin is being used with increasing frequency as a primary agent for the treatment of S. aureus bacteremia, particularly for persistent bacteremia in which vancomycin MICs are 2 μg/mL. Two studies showed that daptomycin may be more efficacious than vancomycin for the treatment of such bacteremias (12),(13). These two studies showed daptomycin is associated with decreased 60 day or 30 day mortality and fewer instances of persistent bacteremia (12),(13).
Similarly, daptomycin is commonly employed for the treatment of difficult Vancomycin Resistant Enterococcus (VRE) infections, such as bacteremia, based on invitro activity and data from individual cases reports, despite the lack of clinical trial data (14). Many studies have reported invitro susceptibility to daptomycin and linezolid against gram positive bacterial isolates (15),(16),(17),(18).
In the view of a few published studies from India on the antimicrobial susceptibility to daptomycin against MRSA isolates showing vancomycin creep phenomenon (5), the study was undertaken with the aim of identifying isolates of MRSA from clinical specimens and assessing the vancomycin and daptomycin susceptibility pattern of MRSA isolates and to find out the existence of any association between MICs of these two crucial antimicrobials.
Material and Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted over a period of six months from January to June 2019, in a tertiary care hospital in Pune, Maharashtra, India, after obtaining the approval from Institutional Ethics committee (approval no. IEC/315). The informed consent was obtained from patients after admission to the hospital for all the investigations to be conducted on the patient, as per hospital policy. All the isolates who were fulfilling inclusion criteria were included in the study. The current study was a part of author’s earlier study on vancomycin MIC creep phenomenon (19).
Inclusion criteria: Only one isolate per patient was included in this study. For patients with more than one isolate, only the first isolate was tested. All nonrepetitive MRSA isolates from different clinical specimen, received in the Microbiology laboratory during the study period were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Repetitive MRSA isolates from a patient and MRSA from sputum samples were excluded.
Study Procedure
All isolates were identified as S. aureus using routine bacteriological procedures (Gram’s stain microscopic examination, catalase test and coagulase test, mannitol fermentation test). Susceptibility testing for cefoxitin was performed using the disk diffusion method, in accordance with the criteria of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Isolates which showed resistance to cefoxitin were labelled as MRSA (20).
MIC determination for vancomycin and daptomycin: MIC value for vancomycin was determined by using the E-test (Hi media) (21). Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) value for daptomycin was determined by Epsilometer test using the E-test MIC strip (Hi media) method, in which daptomycin E-test strips (Himedia) were applied onto Muller Hinton agar plates supplemented with calcium with 0.5 McFarland suspension of microorganisms. The daptomycin E-test contained a concentration gradient of daptomycin throughout the strip.
All plates were incubated at 35°C for 24 hours. The MIC values for vancomycin and daptomycin were measured as the zone of inhibition that corresponds to a concentration gradient on the E-test strips, as per the manufacturer’s instructions and interpretation made as per CLSI criteria. Susceptibility breakpoint for daptomycin was considered as <1 μg/mL for staphylococci, as recommended by the CLSI (20).
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was done by SPSS (version 16.0) statistical software (SPSS Inc., IBM), and descriptive statistics was used.
Results
In this study, 90 isolates of MRSA were included. More number of MRSA was isolated from male patients 51 (56.7%) as compared to female patients 39 (43.3%). We included MRSA isolated from Inpatient Department (IPD) samples 81 (90%) and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) 9 (10%).
Distribution of MRSA in different types of samples: Among the total 90 samples, MRSA was isolated most commonly from pus 51 (56.7%) followed by urine 23 (25.5%), blood 9 (10%) and miscellaneous samples which included swabs 5 (5.5%) and catheter tips 2 (2.2%) (Table/Fig 1).
Distribution of MRSA as per age of patients: MRSA was most commonly isolated from the age group 11-30 years (33 isolates) and least number of cases were seen in the age group of 71-90 years (11 isolates) (Table/Fig 2).
Vancomycin MICs: Out of 90 isolates, isolate no. 1 had vancomycin MIC 0.5 μg/mL while for second isolate MIC was 0.6. For isolates no. 3-22 MIC was 0.75 and isolate no. 23-46 showed MIC value of 1. MIC value for the isolate no.47-78 was 1.5. Five isolates in this study (no.79-83) showed MIC 1.75 and remaining seven isolates (no. 84-90) demonstrated MIC value of 2 μg/mL (Table/Fig 3).
Daptomycin MICs: Out of 90 isolates included in the study, isolate no. 1 and 2 had Daptomycin MIC 0.25 μg/mL. For isolates no. 3-22 MIC was 0.38 and isolate no. 23-46 showed MIC value of 0.5. MIC value for the isolate no. 47-78 was 0.75. Last 12 isolates in this study (no. 79-90) demonstrated MIC value of 1 μg/mL (Table/Fig 3).
A 68 MRSA isolates showed vancomycin MIC creep phenomenon.These results suggested that the MRSA isolates which showed increased MICs for vancomycin also showed corresponding increase in daptomycin MICs.
Discussion
Though, all MRSA isolates in this study were susceptible to daptomycin, a few isolates showed increase in MIC in the susceptible range, which well correlated with isolates showing vancomycin MIC creep. Daptomycin susceptibility results for MRSA from this study correlate well with other similar studies conducted in India which also reported 100% daptomycin susceptibility (5). A study group from Asia pacific region reported >99% susceptibility of daptomycin against staphylococci (16). Another study from India has also reported daptomycin MIC in the range of 0.047-1 ug/mL (22).
The MIC for daptomycin among MRSA, in present study was in the range of 0.25 1 μg/mL with most of the isolates of MRSA having an MIC of 0.38-0.75 μg/mL and a few isolates having MIC of 1 μg/mL. The MIC of daptomycin for MRSA in present study however was relatively higher than in study by Yousuf T et al., in Kashmir in 2015. In their study, maximum MRSA isolates were reported with MIC value of 0.128 μg/mL (23).
Another study conducted by Chitnis S et al., showed majority of MRSA isolates had MIC values between 0.19-0.5 μg/mL with maximum isolates having MIC value of 0.5 μg/mL (5). MIC values reported in present study was comparatively higher than Chitnis S et al., study (5).
In this study, association was found between MICs of vancomycin and daptomycin. The isolates showing increased vancomycin MICs (vancomycin MIC creep) also showed increase in MICs of daptomycin. These findings was in concordance with the study by Kelly P et al., (24). In a study by Sakoulas G et al., they also supported the evidence of reduced activity of daptomycin against MRSA which exhibit a reduced susceptibility to vancomycin, especially if a patient is treated earlier heavily with vancomycin. The authors in their study, also concluded that MRSA infections treated with daptomycin in early phases, instead of vancomycin can have better potential of cure of these infections (25). The same can be true for our patients also, as most patients had received vancomycin empirically, even before antimicrobial susceptibility test report is available which must have led to the obvious decrease in susceptibility to daptomycin.
Further studies are needed especially from Indian set up, to throw light upon the probability of development of daptomycin non susceptibility in MRSA showing reduced vancomycin susceptibility.
Limitation(s)
Sample size was small in present study. Also, only E-test method was used for detection of vancomycin and daptomycin MICs instead of more better and gold standard methods like MIC broth microdilution.
Conclusion
Strict infection prevention and control measures need to be emphasised to control the prevalence of MRSA in healthcare setup. Daptomycin can be a good therapeutic alternative to the vancomycin to treat infections caused by MRSA in present setup. The selection of antibiotic should be based on invitro susceptibility, antibiogram pattern of microorganisms in a particular healthcare setting and history empirical use of vancomycin especially while considering treatment with daptomycin.
Acknowledgement
Authors would like to show their heartfelt gratitude to all laboratory staff including technicians Mrs. Hemwati, Mrs. Beena, Mrs. Sunita and Mrs. Shubhangi, from our laboratory and the management for their kind cooperation in making the research successful.
Reference
| 1. | Diaz R, Afreixo V, Ramalheira E, Rodrigues C, Gago B. Evaluation of vancomycin MIC creep in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections- A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:97-104.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 2. | Kehrmann J, Kaase M, Szabados F, Gatermann SG, Buer J, Rath PM, et al. Vancomycin MIC creep in MRSA blood culture isolates from Germany: A regional problem? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:677e83.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 3. | Dhand A, Sakoulas G. Reduced vancomycin susceptibility among clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates (‘the MIC Creep’): Implications for therapy. F1000 Med Rep. 2012;4:1.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 4. | Arshad F, Saleem S, Jahan S,Taheer R. Assessment of vancomycin MIC creep phenomenon in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in a tertiary care hospital of Lahore. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(7):1505-10.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | Chitnis S, Katara G, Hemvani N, Siddika P, Chitnis D. Invitro activity of daptomycin and linezolid against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin resistant enterococci isolated from hospitalized cases in Central India. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(1):191-96.
| 6. | McDaneld PM, Spooner LM, Mohr JF, Belliveau PP. Use of daptomycin to treat infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates having vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1.5 to 2 μg/mL. Ann Pharmacother. 2013;47(12):1654-65.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Sauermann R, Rothenburger M, Graninger W, Joukhadar C. Daptomycin: A review 4 years after first approval. Pharmacology Review. 2008;81:79-91.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Straus SK, Hancock RE. Mode of action of the new antibiotic for Gram- positive pathogens daptomycin: Comparison with cationic antimicrobial peptides and lipopeptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1758:1215-23.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Ho SW, Jung D, Calhoun JR, Lear JD, Okon M, Scott WR, et al. Effect of divalent cations on the structure of the antibiotic daptomycin. Eur Biophys J. 2008;37:421-33.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Jung D, Rozek A, Okon M, Hancock RE. Structural transitions as determinants of the action of the calcium-dependent antibiotic daptomycin. Chem Biol. 2004;11:949-57.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Muraih JK, Pearson A, Silverman J, Palmer M. Oligomerisation of daptomycin on membranes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2011;18(08):1154-60.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Moore CL, Osaki-Kiyan P, Haque NZ, Perri MB, Donabedian S, Zervos MJ. Daptomycin versus vancomycin for bloodstream infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration: A case-control study. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:51-58.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Murray KP, Zhao J, Davis SL, Kullar R, Kaye K, Lephart P, et al. Early use of daptomycin versus vancomycin for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with vancomycin MIC 1 mg/L: A matched cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1562-69.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 14. | Canton R, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Chaves RL, Johnson AP. A potential role for daptomycin in enterococcal infections: What is the evidence? J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:1126-36.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Diederen BM, Duijn IV, Willemse P, Klutymans JW. Invitro activity of daptomycin against methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus including heterogeneously glycopeptide resistant strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50:3189-91.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | Biedenach DJ, Bell JM, Sader HS, Fritsche TR, Jones RN, Turnidge JD. Antimicrobial susceptibility of gram positive bacterial isolates from the Asia Pacific region and an invitro evaluation of the bactericidal activity of daptomycin, vancomycin and teicoplanin: A SENTRY program report (2003-2004). Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30:143-49.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 17. | Sader HS, Wallers AA, Fritsche TR, Jones RN. Daptomycin antimicrobial activity tested against methicillin resistant staphylococci and vancomycin resistant enterococci isolated in European medical centres (2005). BMC Infect Dis. 2007;7:29.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Jorgen B, Merckoll P, Melby KK. Susceptibility to daptomycin, quinupristin-dalfopristin and linezolid and some other antibiotics in clinical isolates of methicillin resistant and methicillin sensitive S. aureus from the Oslo area. Scand J Infect Dis. 2007;39:1059-62.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 19. | Kulkarni K, Kulkarni S, Pathak N. Evaluation of vancomycin mic creep phenomenon in mrsa isolates from clinical samples. Int J Recent Sci Res. 2020;11(03):37797-800.
| 20. | Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 29th Informational Supplement. (M100-S29). Wayne, PA, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2019.
| 21. | Nadarajah R, Post L, Liu C, Miller S, Sahm D, Brooks G. Detection of vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus with the updated Trek-Sensititre System and the MicroScan System. Comparison with results from the conventional Etest and CLSI standardized MIC methods. Am J Clin Pathol. 2010;133(6):844-48.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Mathai D, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN, Bell JM, Turnidge J, Sader HS. India Daptomycin Study group. Activity of daptomycin against gram positive bacterial isolates from Indian medical centre (2006-2007). Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:497-99.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 23. | Yousuf T, Yousuf S, Suhail M, Kakru D. Screening of MRSA and VRE antibiotic sensitivity or susceptibility towards daptomycin, linezolid and vancomycin. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2015;4(11):2007-22.
| 24. | Kelley P, Gao W, Ward P. Daptomycin nonsusceptibility in Vancomycin Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) and heterogenous-VISA Hvisa: Implications for therapy after vancomycin treatment failure. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66(5):1057-60.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 25. | Sakoulas G, Alder J, Eliopoulos C, Moellering RC, Eliopoulos GM. Induction of daptomycin heterogenous susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus by exposure to vancomycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(4):1581-85. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
10.7860/JCDR/2021/48874.15087
Date of Submission: Feb 08, 2021
Date of Peer Review: May 04, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jun 02, 2021
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2021
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 10, 2021
• Manual Googling: May 27, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jun 12, 2021 (10%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|