Year :
2011
| Month :
June
| Volume :
5
| Issue :
3
| Page :
665 - 668
Full Version
Hyperdontia- 3 Cases Reported
Published: June 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1290
SUJATA.M.BHYATTI
Department of Oral medicine and Radiology, Maratha Mandals
N.G.Halgekar institute of dental sciences and reaserch
centre,Belgaum,India
Correspondence Address :
Sujata.M.Byahatti, Plot no 49, sector # 9, Malmaruti Extn,
Belgaum-590016. E-mail address: sujatabyahatti@rediffmail.com
Phone: 9731589981, 08312456931
Abstract
A supernumerary tooth may closely resemble the teeth of the group to which it belongs, i.e molars, premolars, or anterior teeth or it may bear little resemblance in size or shape to the teeth with which it is associated. It has been suggested that supernumerary teeth develop from a third tooth bud which arises from the dental lamina near the permanent tooth bud or possibly from the splitting of the permanent tooth bud itself. In some cases, there appears to be a hereditary tendency for the development of supernumerary teeth. A supernumerary tooth is an additional entity to the normal series and is seen in all quadrantsof the jaw.
The incidence of these teeth is not uncommon. Different variants of supernumerary teeth are discussed and reviewed in detail in the following article.
Keywords
Supernumerary Teeth, Mesiodens, Upper Distomolar
Introduction
A supernumerary tooth (or hyperodontia) is defined as an increase in the number of teeth in a given individual, i.e., more than 20 deciduous or temporary teeth and over 32 teeth in the case of the permanent dentition (1), (2).
Supernumerary teeth are a rare alteration in the development of the maxillas which can appear in any part of the maxillas and can affect any tooth. They can be associated with a syndrome or they can be found in nonsyndromic patients (3), (4).
The aetiology of hyperdontia is still uncertain. A hereditary component has been suggested (5)(6)(7) and current genetic studies have revealed the possible intervention of ectodine as an inhibitor protein against the third dentition (8)(9)(10). The incidence of supernumerary teeth varies between 0.45-3%, depending on the literature source and is more common in females than in males (proportion 2:1) (11), (12).
While such teeth may be found in any region of the dental arch, they are more commonly located in the maxillary midline where they are referred to as mesiodens, representing 80% of all the supernumerary teeth(13), (14).
This location is followed in the decreasing order of frequency by four molars or the upper distomolars, the upper paramolars and proportionately far behind by the lower premolars, the upper lateral incisors, the lower fourth molars and the lower central incisors. The upper premolars are exceptional as are the upper and lower canines and the lower lateral incisors(15).
Regarding the aetiology of the supernumerary teeth, most authors point to phylogenetic factors specifically hyperactivity within the dental lamina which causes the appearance of additional dental buds (16), (17). Clinically, supernumerary teeth are able to cause different local disorders, including retention of the primary tooth, delayed eruption of the permanent tooth, ectopic eruptions, tooth displacements, follicular cysts and other alterations which require surgical or orthodontic intervention (18), (19).
The extraction of these teeth is a general rule for avoiding complications(15). Nevertheless, some authors such as Koch et al (20) do not recommend the extractions of impacted teeth in children under 10 years of age since in this particular age group, such procedures often require general anaesthesia. Kruger (21) considers that the extraction of supernumerary teeth should be postponed until the apexes of the adjacent teeth have sealed. According to Donado (22), treatment should be provided as soon as possible in order to avoid the displacement and delayed eruption of the permanent teeth.
CASE HISTORY 1
A 17 year old apparently healthy male patient visited our department with a history of deposits on his teeth and wanted to get them cleaned. On intraoral examination, the entire soft tissues appeared to be normal. The hard tissue examination revealed the presence of an extra tooth (suplementary tooth) distal to lateral incisor, but on the buccal side on both sides of the (Table/Fig 1) in the upper jaw. (Table/Fig 1)The lateral incisors on both the sides were found to be palatally erupting (Table/Fig 2).
The upper right side quadrant showed that the first molar was missing. The upper left quadrant showed retained canine. When the tooth number was counted from canine to canine, there should be 6 teeth but here, 8 teeth were there. Then, the patient was subjected to radiography to differentiate this extra tooth from the fusion or the gemination. Orthopantomography (Table/Fig 3) showed that the extra supplementary teeth appeared single and that they were not related to the adjacent tooth but resembled the adjacent canine; hence, they were called as supplementary teeth. Again, as both the teeth were asymptomatic, they were kept under observation. (Table/Fig 3)
CASE HISTORY 2
A 52 year old apparently healthy male patient visited our department with a history of decayed tooth. On intraoral examination, the entire soft tissues appeared to be normal. The hard tissue examination revealed the presence of an extra tooth (suplementary tooth) distal to lateral incisor (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5) on both sides of the upper anterior quadrant. Here also the number of teeth from canine to canine, was 8.i.e Hperdontia noted here also. (Table/Fig 4), (Table/Fig 5).
Then, the patient was subjected to radiography to differentiate this from the fusion or the gemination. Orthopantomography (Table/Fig 6) showed that the extra supplementary teeth appeared single and that they were not related to the adjacent tooth but resembled the adjacent lateral incisor; hence, they were called supplementary teeth. Again, as both the teeth were asymptomatic, they were kept under observation. (Table/Fig 6)
CASE HISTORY 3
A 24 year old apparently healthy Army candidate visited our department with a history of food lodgement in the upper right posterior quadrant. On intraoral examination, the entire soft tissues appeared to be normal. The hard tissue examination revealed the presence of an extra tooth on the buccal side of 18, which was called as a perimolar tooth (supernumerary tooth) (Table/Fig 7).
Deep probing between the supernumerary tooth and 18 revealed a catch and carious lesion, with a supernumerary tooth. As the tooth was placed on the buccal side, he underwent occlusal radiography(Table/Fig 8), but the findings were not very contributory. Then, the patient underwent the extraction of this symptomatic supernumerary tooth. (Table/Fig 8)
Discussion
Several researchers have also proposed that multiple supernumerary teeth are the part of a post permanent dentition (23), (24).
The exact mode of inheritance has not been established. However, a familial tendency has been noted (12), (25). It has been stated that the development of supernumerary teeth may cause various pathologies. Approximately 75% of the supernumerary teeth are impacted and asymptomatic and most of these teeth are diagnosed coincidentally during radiographical examination (6). In a survey on 2,000 schoolchildren, Brook (26) found that supernumerary teeth were present in 0.8% of the primary dentition and in 2.1% of the permanent dentition. The occurrence may be single or multiple, unilateral or bilateral, erupted or impacted and in one or both the jaws. Supernumerary teeth are classified according to the morphology and location as conical, tuberculate, supplemental and odontome (26).
Conical teeth are small peg shaped teeth which are most commonly found in the permanent dentition. The tuberculate type possesses more than one cusp or tubercle. It is frequently described as barrel- shaped and may be invaginated. The supplemental supernumerary teeth refer to a duplication of the teeth in the normal series and are found at the end of the tooth series. The most common supplemental tooth is the permanent maxillary lateral incisor but supplemental premolars and molars can also occur. Odontome has been listed as the fourth category of the supernumerary teeth by Howard. Supernumerary teeth are infrequent developmental alterations that may manifest in any zone of the dental arches and may involve any tooth; they may be associated to syndromes or can also be found in non-syndromic populations (27).
According to the consulted literature sources, the frequency of supernumerary teeth has been found to vary according to the population which is studied, ie. between 0.1-3.8% (28)(29)(30) and this has been found to reach up to 28% in patients with cleft palate and harelip (31).
According to Salcido-Garcia et al (27), the appearance of supernumerary teeth is more frequent in the first three decades of life than in the older age groups. However, in studies on adult populations, the frequencies have been found to be lower (between 0.4% and 1%) with an increased location in the maxilla, though they can also occur in the posterior sectors of the arch (32)(33)(34)(35).
The principal location of the supernumerary teeth is the premaxillary zone (mesiodens) in children and the distomolar in adults.Most authors consider the most common mechanical accident to be the reason for delayed eruption of the adjacent teeth (15), (36).
Conclusion
Early diagnosis is important in order to minimize the risk of complications resulting from supernumerary teeth. If they have caused delay or non-eruption of the permanent teeth, displacement of the permanent teeth and root resorption of the adjacent teeth due to pressure and cystic formations, then extraction is recommended.
However, the extraction of asymptomatic supernumerary teeth that does not affect the dentition may not always be necessary but these teeth should be followed through periodic examinations. The one and two patients in this study were kept under Observation, whereas the third patient presented with supernumerary tooth (decayed) underwent extraction of the same.
Reference
| 1. | Domínguez A, Mendoza A, Fernández H. Estudio retrospectivo de dien¬tes supernumerarios en 2045 pacientes. Avances en Odontoestomatología 1995;11:575-82. | 2. | Peñarrocha MA, Peñarrocha M, Larrazábal C, Mínguez I. Dientes supernumerarios consideraciones quirúrgicas y ortodóncicas. Archivos de Odontoestomatología 2003; 19:263-72. | 3. | Leco Berrocal MI, Martín Morales JF, Martínez González JM.An observational study of the frequency of supernumerary teeth in a population of 2000 patients. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2007;12:E134-8. | 4. | Liu DG, Zhang WL, Zhang ZY, Wu YT, Ma XC. Three-dimensional evaluations of supernumerary teeth using cone-beam computed tomography for 487 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:403-11. | 5. | Atwan SM, Turner D, Khalid A. Early intervention to remove mesiodens and avoid orthodontic therapy. Gen Dent. 2000;48:166-9. | 6. | Babu V, Nagesh KS, Diwakar NR. A rare case of hereditary multiple impacted normal and supernumerary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent.1998;23:59-61. | 7. | Seddon RP, Johnstone SC, Smith PB. Mesiodentes in twins:a case report and a review of the literature. Int J Paediatr Dent.1997;7:177- 84. | 8. | Thesleff I. The genetic basis of tooth development and dental defects. Am J Med Genet A. 2006;140:2530-5. | 9. | Kassai Y, Munne P, Hotta Y, Penttilä E, Kavanagh K, Ohbayashi N, et al. Regulation of mammalian tooth cusp patterning by ectodin.Science. 2005;309:2067-70. | 10. | Thesleff I. Developmental biology and building a tooth. QuintessenceInt. 2003;34:613-20. | 11. | Salem G. Prevalence of selected dental anomalies in Saudi children from Gizan region. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1989; 17:162-3. | 12. | Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of dental anomalies in ortho¬dontic patients. Aust Dent 1998;43:395-8. | 13. | Alaejos C, Contreras MA, Buenechea R, Berini L, Gay C. Mesiodens: A retrospectiva de una serie de 44 pacientes. Medicina Oral 2000;5:81- 8. | 14. | Danalli DN, Buzzato JF, Braum TW, Murphy SM. Long-term interdis¬ciplinary management of multiple mesiodens and delayed eruption: report of a case. J Dent Child 1988;55:376-80. | 15. | Gay C, Mateos M, España A, Gargallo J. Otras inclusiones dentarias: Mesiodens y otros dientes supernumerarios. Dientes temporales incluidos. En: Gay C, Berini L, eds. Cirugía Bucal. Madrid: Editorial Ergon, Madrid; 1999. p. 511-50. | 16. | Huang WH, Tsai TP. Mesioens in tehe primary entition stage: a radio¬graphic study. J Dent Child 1992;18:186-9. | 17. | Prinosch RE. Anterior supernumerary theeth assessment and surgical intervention in children. Pediatr Dent 1981;3:202-15. | 18. | Ziberman Y, Malron M, Shteyer R. Assessment of 100 children in Jerusalem with supernumerary teeth in the premaxillary region. J Dent Child 1992;59:44-7. | 19. | Dehdashti M, Gugny P. A propos des polyodonties, proposition d´une approche therapeutique. Rev Orthop Dento Faciale 1990;24:465-71. | 20. | Koch H, Schwartz O, Klausen B. Indications for surgical removal supernumerary teeth in the premaxila. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986;15:272- 81. | 21. | Kruger GO. Tratado de Cirugía Bucal. México: Editorial Interamericana; 1984.p.329-31. | 22. | Donado M. Otras inclusiones. En: Cirugía Bucal. Patología y Técnica. Barcelona: Editorial Masson; 2005.p.434-59. | 23. | Açikgöz A, Açikgöz G, Tunga U, Otan F. Characteristics and preva-lence of non-syndrome multiple supernumerary teeth: a retrospective study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2006; 185-190. | 24. | Rajab LD, Hamdan MAM. Supernumerary teeth: a review of the literature and a survey of 152 cases. Int Pediatr Dent 2002; 12: 244-254. | 25. | Sedano HO, Gorlin R. Familial occurence of mesiodens. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol 1969; 27: 360-362. | 26. | R Rajendran, B Sivapathasundharam editors, Shafer’s textbook of Oral Pathology. 6th edition, Elsevier publications.1975; p 46. | 27. | Salcido JF, Ledesma C, Hernández F, Pérez D, Garcés M. Frecuencia de dientes supernumerarios en una población Mexicana. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2004;9:403-9. | 28. | Sacal C, Alfoso E, Keene H. Retrospective survey of dental anomalies and pathology detected on maxillary occlusal radiographs in children between 3 an 5 years of age. Pediatr Dent 2002;23:347-50. | 29. | Nazif MM, Rufalo Rc, Zullo T. Impacted supernumerary teeth: A survey of 50 cases. J Am Dent Assoc 1983; 106:201-4. | 30. | Skrinjaric I, Barac V. Anomalies of deciduous teeth and findings in permanent dentition. Acta Stomatol Croat 1991;25:151-6. | 31. | Milhon JA, Stafne EC. Incidence of supernumerary and congenitally missing lateral incisor teeth in 81 cases of harelip and cleft palate. Am J Orthod 1941;37:599-604. | 32. | Byrgess JO. A panoramic radiographic. Analysis of Air Force basic trainees. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:113-21. | 33. | Langland OE, Langlais Rp, Morris CR, Preece JW. Panoramic radiographic survey of dentist participating in ADA health programs 1976, 1977 and 1978. J Am Dent J 1980; 101:279-82. | 34. | Osborne GE, Hemmings KW. A survey of disease changes observed on dental panoramic tomographs taken of patients attending a periodontology clinic. Br Dent J 1992; 173:166-8. | 35. | Barret AP, Waters BE, Griffiths CI. A critical evaluation of panoramic radiography on a screening procedure in dental practice. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1984;57:673-6. | 36. | Dauder D, Peñarrocha M, Sanchís JM. Estudio retrospectivo de dientes supernumerarios de 1013 pacientes. Anales Odontoestomatol 1998; 3:1127-9. |
|