JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 5561

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : July | Volume : 18 | Issue : 7 | Page : UC07 - UC11 Full Version

Effect of Intravenous Vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine on Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption after Laparoscopic Gynaecologic Oncosurgeries: A Randomised Controlled Study

Published: July 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/69526.19623

ND Rachana, Namrata Ranganath, VR Pallavi, GS Shashidhar, BH Arathi, VB Gowda

1. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 2. Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 3. Professor, Department of Gynaeconcology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 4. Associate Professor, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 5. Professor and Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. 6. Professor and Ex-Head, Department of Anaesthesiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. GS Shashidhar,
Kidwai Cancer Institute, Dr. MH Marigowda Road, Near Dairy Circle, Bengaluru-560029, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: rachanakiran84@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative pain is one of the common causes of increased postoperative morbidity and delayed recovery. Pain causes adverse effects such as hypertension, tachycardia, myocardial ischaemia, decreased alveolar ventilation, poor wound healing, and postoperative morbidity. Vitamin C and N-acetylcysteine (NAC), which is a novel co-analgesic, are being studied to reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption.

Aim: To study the effect of intravenous Vitamin C and NAC on postoperative surgical pain and opioid consumption after laparoscopic gynaecologic oncosurgeries.

Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomised controlled study conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India on 300 patients of American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical status 1 and 2 scheduled for laparoscopic Gynaeconcology surgery after obtaining written informed consent. All the selected patients were randomly allocated into three groups. Group P was the control group in Group N patients received intravenous injections of NAC (50 mg/kg) and vitamin C infusion (50 mg/kg) in Group C. Patients were explained about the visual analogue pain scale preoperatively. In the postoperative period, VAS scores were recorded and noted along with the rescue analgesics received and side-effects.

Results: Haemodynamic variables were comparable among all three groups. The number of patients who had VAS scores of more than 4 was lower in group C (Vitamin C) at various time intervals when compared to the NAC and placebo groups. It was also statistically significant at 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes, 300 minutes, and 10 hours (p-value=0.014, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.003, 0.005, 0.006, respectively). Postoperative opioid consumption was significantly reduced in group C (Vitamin C) compared to the other two groups (p-value <0.001).

Conclusion: Intraoperative Vitamin C usage reduced postoperative pain and fentanyl consumption in the postoperative period, and NAC can be used as a part of multimodal analgesia.

Keywords

Analgesia, Co-analgesics, Fentanyl, Pain scores

Introduction
Pain is defined as “an unpleasant sensory and emotional experience associated with actual or potential tissue damage, or described in terms of such damage” (1). Adequate pain control in cancer patients undergoing surgical procedures remains the primary goal of anaesthesiologists. Inadequate postoperative analgesia can lead to delayed recovery, mobility issues, delay in initiating chemotherapy, pneumonia, myocardial infarction, and depression. This can further increase morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, contributing to a diminished quality of life (2).

The goal of adequate postoperative pain control is best achieved through multimodal and preemptive analgesia. Postsurgery pain is mainly an inflammatory nociceptive kind of pain related to noxious stimuli, resulting in the perception of pain. It could also result from the release of chemical mediators due to tissue inflammation (3). In postoperative pain management, opioids are one of the most widely used classes of analgesics as part of multimodal analgesia. The use of opioids can be associated with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV), sedation, respiratory depression, and delayed recovery in the postsurgical period. Additionally, some patients are known to develop an addiction to opioids with long-term use. Recently, non opioid analgesic modalities and alternatives have been introduced to enhance pain management and reduce the consumption of opioids and opioid-related side-effects in the postoperative period (3). Among the various available co-analgesics, Vitamin C and NAC have also been studied.

Vitamin C (ascorbic acid) is a water-soluble vitamin that has antioxidant, neuromodulating, and neuroprotective effects (4),(5). Additionally, vitamin C has been shown to modulate pain sensitisation through its action on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor. Recent studies have indicated that vitamin C supplementation can be useful as an adjunct to pain management by reducing opioid consumption and side-effects related to opioids (6),(7),(8).

Analgesic drugs currently under trial target group-II metabotropic glutamate receptor subtypes (mGlu2 and mGlu3 receptors) (9),(10). NAC is a novel co-analgesic under trial for its analgesic properties. It acts by activating the glutamate: cystine antiporter (Sxc) and thus reinforcing the endogenous activation of mGlu2/3 receptors (11). In animal models, it has been shown to have analgesic effects on neuropathic and inflammatory pain types, thereby reducing opioid consumption and related side-effects (12),(13). NAC is known to regulate oxidative stress, reduce reactive oxygen species release, and has been used in treating complex pain syndromes, as chronic pain states often have excessive levels of reactive oxygen species (14),(15). NAC has shown positive effects on chronic neuropathic pain, but no studies have been conducted on acute pain conditions (15). Due to its easy availability and cost-effectiveness, NAC can be used as an adjunct to opioids in an attempt to reduce opioid consumption.

Therefore, aim was to study the effects of high-dose vitamin C (50 mg/kg) and the novel co-analgesic NAC on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic gynaecological oncosurgeries during the first 24 hours after surgery as the primary objective. The secondary objectives included studying pain scores in all three groups and postoperative side-effects. This was the first study of its kind to assess the safety and efficacy of perioperative administration of Vitamin C and NAC for postoperative surgical pain relief and opioid consumption in laparoscopic gynaeco-onco surgeries.
Material and Methods
This prospective non blinded randomised controlled study was conducted between January 2019 and December 2022. Approval for the study was obtained from the ethical committee of Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) number (KMIO/MEC/2018/02/C/AN/35). The study was registered under CTRI with the CTRI No – CTRI/2019/09/021332.

Inclusion criteria: All patients aged 18 to 75 years undergoing elective laparoscopic gynaecological oncology procedures under general anaesthesia were enrolled in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with a history of allergy to systemic opioids, chronic opioid use, substance use disorder, sleep apnoea, coagulopathy, and analgesic use within 24 hours were excluded from the study.

A member of the research team contacted the patients to explain the study protocol and obtain written informed consent for participation. The day before surgery, all patients were provided with information on how to rate pain intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable. Patients were randomly allocated to groups based on the randomisation table.

Sample size calculation: A sample size of 300 (100 cases in each group) was deemed adequate, considering 80% power and a 5% alpha level of significance.

Methodology: General anaesthesia was administered according to a standard protocol and monitored in accordance with the American Society of Anaesthesiologists guidelines (16). Anaesthesia was induced with intravenous midazolam 1 mg, fentanyl 1 μg/kg, propofol (1 to 2 mg/kg), and vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) to facilitate intubation. After anaesthesia induction and creation of pneumoperitoneum at a flow rate of 12 to 14 mL per minute with intraperitoneal pressures ranging from 12 to 14 mm Hg, the prepared injection was administered by a team member based on group allocation. Patients in the Vitamin C group (group C) received vitamin C 50 mg/kg (17) (ascorbic acid 10 g/20 mL), those in the NAC group (group N) received NAC 50 mg/kg (18). Both drugs were administered as an infusion mixed with normal saline for a total injection volume of 50 mL, and normal saline 50 mL was infused to the placebo group (Group P) of patients. The prepared solution was infused over 30 minutes using an infusion pump once the pneumoperitoneum was created. Doses of Vitamin C and NAC were adjusted from the doses mentioned in CTRI accordingly after the pilot study. Anaesthesia was maintained using 1-1.5% isoflurane in a mixture of 50% oxygen in air. Vecuronium was utilised to maintain adequate muscle relaxation, i.v. injection of fentanyl 25 μg bolus was used as intraoperative analgesia, and intravenous lactated Ringer’s solution was administered at a rate of 4 to 5 mL/kg/h during surgery as maintenance fluid. Ondansetron 4 mg intravenously was administered to prevent PONV unless contraindicated. All surgeries were performed with a mini-laparotomy incision below the umbilicus at the camera port using a 4-port technique with patients in the Trendelenburg position.

After completion of surgery and meeting extubation criteria, neuromuscular blockade was reversed using Neostigmine and Glycopyrrolate. Extubated patients were transferred to the postoperative care unit. Upon arrival at the postoperative care unit, patients were evaluated for pain using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score. If the pain intensity exceeded a VAS score of 4 for ≥30 minutes, rescue analgesia (Inj. fentanyl 25 μg) was administered.

A research assistant was assigned to monitor patients’ postoperative surgical pain scores, PONV, fentanyl consumption, side-effects, and the need for rescue analgesia every 15 minutes during their stay in the PACU for the first hour, and every 30 minutes until four hours postsurgery, and then at 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 24 hours after surgery. A total of 300 patients were enrolled in the study with written informed consent. Five patients were excluded from the study as laparoscopy was converted to open laparotomy intraoperatively (Table/Fig 1).

Statistical Analysis

The collected data was entered into the Microsoft Excel program. Univariate and multivariate frequency tables were generated using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) statistical software. A comparison of parameters between cases and controls, measured on a continuous scale, was conducted using the Independent Student’s t-test. For categorical variables, an association study was performed using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Demographic details were similar among all three study groups and was not significant statistically (Table/Fig 2).

Haemodynamic variables noted at the baseline (B) at the beginning of infusion (IN) and at the End of Infusion (EIN) showed no difference between all three groups (Table/Fig 3).

Postoperative pain scores in the three groups at various time intervals are presented in (Table/Fig 4). Mean pain scores, when compared between the three groups, demonstrated that group C (Vitamin C group) had more consistent and lower pain scores compared to the other two groups.

The VAS score was assessed for 24 hours postsurgery. In this study, the number of patients with VAS scores exceeding four was lower in group C (Vitamin C) at various time intervals compared to the NAC and placebo groups. The differences were statistically significant at 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes, 300 minutes, and 10 hours (p-value=0.014, <0.001, <0.001, <0.001, 0.003, 0.005, 0.006 respectively) (Table/Fig 5).

Postoperative opioid consumption was significantly reduced in group C (vitamin C) as compared to the other two groups with a p-value of <0.001 (Table/Fig 6).

A total of 31 patients in group C, 49 in group N, and 58 patients in group P received rescue analgesics. A significantly lower number of patients in the Vitamin C group received rescue analgesics (p-value=0.0013) (Table/Fig 7).

In this study, minimal side-effects were observed in group C compared to the other two groups. In the control group, 10% of patients experienced vomiting, and 10% experienced drowsiness compared to the other groups. None of the patients in any group experienced respiratory depression (Table/Fig 8).
Discussion
In this study, a significant reduction in opioid consumption and postoperative pain was observed in the Vitamin C group. Jeon Y et al., conducted a randomised controlled trial on the effect of using intravenous high-dose vitamin C on postoperative pain and morphine consumption after laparoscopic colectomy. Their study showed that postoperative pain at rest during the first 24 hours and morphine consumption during the first two hours were reduced after laparoscopic colectomy. However, no difference was noted in the consumption of morphine between the treatment and control groups at six hours and 24 hours. High-dose vitamin C infusion also decreased the frequency of demand for rescue analgesics (17). Similarly, in this study, there were decreased postoperative pain scores and reduced cumulative opioid consumption in the group of patients who received Vitamin C.

Wilson SH et al., conducted a randomised pilot trial on the impact of intraoperative NAC on opioid consumption following spine surgery. They used NAC in doses of 50, 100, and 150 mg/kg, and recorded opioid consumption, pain scores, and time to opioid rescue. The study found that patients who received NAC had lower consumption of postoperative opioids and pain scores. These results were comparable to the present study, showing a slight reduction in opioid consumption and pain scores, though not statistically significant (18).

Hung KC et al., conducted a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials on the effect of perioperative Vitamin C on postoperative analgesic consumption. Their results demonstrated significant postoperative reductions in the requirement for opioids and a decrease in pain severity in patients receiving perioperative vitamin C. This suggests that vitamin C may be beneficial as part of a multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia in surgical patients (19). These findings were consistent with the results of the current study.

Mulkens CE et al., conducted a randomised controlled clinical trial on postoperative pain reduction by pre-emptive NAC. They concluded that there were no differences in pain scores postoperatively between the placebo group and the NAC group. However, the percentage of bothersome side-effects in the NAC group was high, leading them to not recommend the preemptive intravenous use of NAC to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (20). In the present study, the NAC group of patients had slightly lower pain scores compared to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of side-effects related to NAC in present study was also not significant.

Gorpynchenko I et al., conducted an observational comparative cohort study on the patients with chronic prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome, oral NAC (600 mg) daily over one month resulted in a 25% decrease in pain scores. This study suggests that NAC has anti-inflammatory effects and helps in reducing pain (21).

Seyfi S et al., conducted a randomised controlled study on NAC’s effect on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The study concluded that NAC can inhibit the function of lipoproteins and prostaglandins due to its anti-inflammatory properties. It was found that reduced glutathione peroxidase and dismutase were restored, indicating that NAC can be used to treat pain or reduce analgesic doses (15). However, in this study, there was no significant decrease in pain scores in the NAC group compared to the other two groups. Li J et al., suggested that NAC attenuates neuropathic pain by suppressing matrix metalloproteinases (22).

Suter M et al., conducted a study on Vitamin C perioperatively in patients undergoing non cardiac surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials revealed a small reduction in postoperative pain in patients who received Vitamin C. This finding was similar to the reduction in postoperative pain observed in patients receiving Vitamin C in the current study (23).

Limitation(s)

There was no consensus on the dosing of NAC.
Conclusion
There was a significant reduction in opioid consumption and pain scores in the postoperative period in the Vitamin C group compared to the NAC and control groups of patients. The NAC group of patients also experienced reduced opioid consumption and pain scores, but this was not statistically significant. Therefore, Vitamin C can be used as part of multimodal analgesia for acute postoperative pain, with the additional benefit of reducing opioid consumption and its associated side-effects. NAC as a co-analgesic for pain needs further evaluation regarding dosing and efficacy.
Reference
1.
International association for the study of pain [Internet]. International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP). International Association for the Study of Pain; 2022 [cited 2024 May 13]. Available from: http://www.iasp-pain.org/.
2.
Breivik H. Postoperative pain management: Why is it difficult to show that it improves outcome? Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1998;15(6):748-51. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003643-199811000-00022.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Kehlet H, Dahl JB. Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery. Lancet. 2003;362(9399):1921-28. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14966-5.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Majewska MD, Bell JA. Ascorbic acid protects neurons from injury induced by glutamate and NMDA. Neuroreport. 1990;1(3):194-96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001756-199011000-00004.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
Majewska MD, Bell JA, London ED. Regulation of the NMDA receptor by redox phenomena: Inhibitory role of ascorbate. Brain Res. 1990;537(1–2):328-32. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0006-8993(90)90379-p.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Besse JL, Gadeyne S, Galand-Desmé S, Lerat JL, Moyen B. Effect of vitamin C on prevention of complex regional pain syndrome type I in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;15(4):179-82. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2009.02.002.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Chen JY, Chang CY, Feng PH, Chu CC, So EC, Hu ML. Plasma vitamin C is lower in postherpetic neuralgia patients and administration of vitamin C reduces spontaneous pain but not brush-evoked pain. Clin J Pain. 2009;25(7):562-69. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AJP.0b013e318193cf32.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Hasanzadeh KF, Soleimani A, Habibi MR, Emami A. Can vitamin C be used as an adjuvant for managing post-operative pain? A short literature review. Korean J Pain. 2013;26:209-10.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Chiechio S, Copani A, De Petris L, Morales ME, Nicoletti F. Gereau 4th RW. Transcriptional regulation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 2/3 expression by the NF-kappaB pathway in primary dorsal root ganglia neurons: A possible mechanism for the analgesic effect of L-acetylcarnitine. Mol Pain. 2006;2:20.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Montana MC, Gereau RW. Metabotropic glutamate receptors as targets for analgesia: Antagonism, activation, and allosteric modulation. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2011;12(10):1681-88. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/138920111798357438.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Bridges R, Lutgen V, Lobner D, Baker DA. Thinking outside the cleft to understand synaptic activity: Contribution of the cystine-glutamate antiporter (System xc-) to normal and pathological glutamatergic signaling. Pharmacol Rev. 2012;64(3):780-802. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.110.003889.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Bernabucci M, Notartomaso S, Zappulla C, Fazio F, Cannella M, Motolese M, et al. N-Acetyl-cysteine causes analgesia by reinforcing the endogenous activation of type-2 metabotropic glutamate receptors. Mol Pain. 2012;8:77. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1744-8069-8-77.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Truini A, Piroso S, Pasquale E, Notartomaso S, Stefano GD, Lattanzi R, et al. N-acetyl-cysteine, a drug that enhances the endogenous activation of group-II metabotropic glutamate receptors, inhibits nociceptive transmission in humans. Mol Pain. 2015;11:s12990-015–0009. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12990-015-0009-2.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Naik AK, Tandan SK, Dudhgaonkar SP, Jadhav SH, Kataria M, Prakash VR, et al. Role of oxidative stress in pathophysiology of peripheral neuropathy and modulation by N-acetyl-l-cysteine in rats. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(7):573-73. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.08.006.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Seyfi S, Zahedian A, Kiabi FH. The effect of N-acetylcysteine on postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized clinical trial. Tehran Univ Med J. 2017;75(2):96-102.
16.
Standards for Basic Anaesthetic Monitoring Developed By: Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters (CSPP) Last Affirmed: December 13, 2020 (last amended October). 1986;20. Available from: https://www.asahq.org.
17.
Jeon Y, Park JS, Moon S, Yeo J. Effect of intravenous high dose vitamin C on postoperative pain and morphine use after laparoscopic colectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:9147279. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9147279.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Wilson SH, Sirianni JM, Bridges KH, Wolf BJ, Valente IE, Scofield MD. The impact of intraoperative N-acetylcysteine on opioid consumption following spine surgery: A randomized pilot trial. Pain Manag. 2023; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.2217/pmt-2023-0061.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Hung KC, Lin YT, Chen KH, Wang LK, Chen JY, Chang YJ, et al. The effect of perioperative vitamin C on postoperative analgesic consumption: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):3109. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu12103109.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Mulkens CE, Staatsen M, van Genugten L, Snoeker BAM, Vissers KCP, Bruhn J, et al. Postoperative pain reduction by pre-emptive N-acetylcysteine: An exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial. Reg Anaesth Pain Med. 2021;46(11):960-64. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2021-102884.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Gorpynchenko I, Nurimanov K, Poroshina T, Savchenko V, Drannik G, Dubuske L. The clinical and immunologic effects of acetylcysteine in the treatment of chronic abacterial Prostatitis. J Allergy and Clin Immunol 2020;145(2):AB30.   [CrossRef]
22.
Li J, Xu L, Deng X, Jiang C, Pan C, Chen L, et al. N-acetyl-cysteine attenuates neuropathic pain by suppressing matrix metalloproteinases. Pain. 2016;157(8):1711-23. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000 000000575.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
Suter M, Bollen Pinto B, Belletti A, Putzu A. Efficacy and safety of perioperative vitamin C in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. Br J Anaesth. 2022;128(4):664-78. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2021.11.039.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/69526.19623

Date of Submission: Jan 13, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Feb 03, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Jun 11, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jan 13, 2024
• Manual Googling: Feb 08, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Jun 10, 2024 (15%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 9
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com