JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 954

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : June | Volume : 18 | Issue : 6 | Page : ZC37 - ZC41 Full Version

Prevalence of Paediatric Head and Neck Malignancies in the North Region of Brazil: A Cross-sectional Study

Published: June 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/70177.19545

Emilly Silva E Silva, Marina Fadul Neves Couto, Gerlane Lima Oliveira, Cássia Alves DE Lima Luna, Marco Tullio Brazão Silva, Caio DE Andrade Hage, John Minh Le, Douglas Magno Guimarães

1. Undergraduate Student, Department of Dentistry, University Center of Pará (CESUPA), Belem, Pará, Brazil. 2. Undergraduate Student, Department of Dentistry, University Center of Pará (CESUPA), Belem, Pará, Brazil. 3. Undergraduate Student, Department of Dentistry, University Center of Pará (CESUPA), Belem, Pará, Brazil. 4. Undergraduate Student, Department of Dentistry, University Center of Pará (CESUPA), Belem, Pará, Brazil. 5. Professor, Department of Oral Pathology, Montes Claros State University, Minas Gerais, Montes Claros, Brazil. 6. MSc Scholar, Department of Dentistry, University Center of Pará (CESUPA), Belem, Pará, Brazil. 7. Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. 8. Professor, Department of Oral Pathology, University Center of Pará (CESUPA), Belem, Pará, Brazil.

Correspondence Address :
Emilly Silva E Silva,
Nove de Janeiro Street, 927, 66060-575, Belem, Pará, Brazil.
E-mail: emilly_ss04@hotmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) ranks sixth among the most common men’s tumours. The prevalence of HNC in children has increased in several countries, and the prevalence varies worldwide. In several regions in Brazil and the world, a lack of epidemiological data records on childhood HNC is observed, demonstrating little knowledge about the demographic profile of these patients.

Aim: To determine the prevalence of HNC in paediatric patients over the years at a reference centre in the North region of Brazil.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with the objective of quantitatively and qualitatively analysing the prevalence of HNC in a reference oncology hospital. The electronic medical records of patients aged 0 to 19 years were reviewed at a referral centre in Northern Brazil from October 2015 to February 2022. Demographic variables, topographic location of tumours, city of origin, patient outcome, and histopathological diagnosis were collected.

Results: A total of 4,113 medical records were analysed, and 126 met the criteria for analysis. Males had a higher incidence n=75 (59.52%) of HNC than females n=51 (40.47%). The age group with the highest percentage of HNC was >4 to 9-year-old n=40 (31.74%). The most common diagnosis were lymphoma 78 (61.90%), sarcoma 22 (17.46%); carcinoma 14 (11.11%), and histiocytosis 10 (7.93%).

Conclusion: In Northern Brazil, the most common tumour was Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and the most prevalent group affected were males aged >4-9-year-old.

Keywords

Child, Epidemiology, Head and neck neoplasm, Tumours

Introduction
The HNC ranks sixth among the most common cancers, with an average of 13,470 new cases of oral cancer per 100,000 inhabitants in Brazil, greatly contributing to the mortality of the adult population (1). HNC is a collective term defined by anatomical-topographic bases to describe malignant tumours of the upper aerodigestive tract. This anatomical region includes the oral cavity, pharynx, and larynx. Considering that these sites are areas directly involved with the function of speech, swallowing, respiration, taste, smell, and others, highly complex treatment is necessary for patients with malignant head and neck neoplasms (2).

In this scenario, childhood HNC stands out. During puberty, the facial skeleton is more susceptible to high doses of radiation, as skeletal development takes on its most critical level. Several changes have been observed in the oral cavity following exposure to radiotherapy and chemotherapy at an early age (3).

The main difference between adult and paediatric cancer is the fact that childhood cancer is not generally associated with individual exposure to environmental risk factors such as smoking, solar radiation, alcohol, obesity, and an unruly diet. The result of this acquired predisposition of cancer in children may result in cancer embryonic cells leading to poorly differentiated tumours; therefore, environmental carcinogens could hypothetically increase the rates at which these mutations occur, but they probably contribute little to the incidences (4).

The State of Pará, the northern region of the country, does not have studies related to the prevalence of childhood HNC, demonstrating a lack of knowledge about interventional health programs to prevent early diagnosis. Limited data on this epidemiological profile in northern Brazil are available, with only studies found on general paediatric cancer, showing a higher prevalence in male patients, with leukemia being the most predominant neoplasm (5). Considering that an early diagnosis is the best way to tackle the disease and improve survival (6), it becomes essential for decision-making regarding treatment and its procedures, as well as conditions associated with a potential outcome of the disease.

Therefore, the present study aimed to analyse the prevalence of this disease in paediatric patients over the years at a reference centre in the North region of Brazil from 2015 to 2022.
Material and Methods
It was a cross-sectional study with the objective of quantitatively and qualitatively analysing the prevalence of HNC in a reference oncology hospital in the North region of Brazil, between the period October 2015 to February 2022. Analysis of the data collected was held from April to May 2022. The present study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Centre of Pará (protocol number 51384821.2.0000.5169).

Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: The possible risks involved in the research, which concern the violation of the identity of voluntary participants, were minimised by guaranteeing anonymity. All patients aged 0-19 years with diagnosis of head and neck tumours registered were included in the study. Medical records of patients with benign tumours, malignant tumours diagnosed outside the head and neck region, second primary tumours, metastases to the head and neck region, tumours affecting the Central Nervous System (CNS), and patients with incomplete medical records were excluded.

Sample size: A total of 4,113 medical records of paediatric patients diagnosed with malignant tumours were captured. Data collection was completed using the Salux (Brazilian Health Management System) software. Information regarding demographic variables (age and sex), topographic location of tumours, city of origin, patient outcome, and histopathological diagnosis were also collected. As it is a secondary data collection, the need for the Informed Consent Term was waived.

Study Procedure

Tumours were grouped and classified according to the 4th edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of Head and Neck Tumours, and the following categories were considered: nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and skull base; nasopharynx; parapharyngeal space; oral cavity and face; oropharynx (base of tongue, tonsils, adenoids); neck and lymph nodes; salivary glands; odontogenic and maxillofacial bone; and ear (7).

Statistical Analysis

Data were collected in a spreadsheet, systematically organised in Microsoft Office Excel 2013 software (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington, USA), and then analysed for descriptive statistics using absolute numbers, percentages, mean values, and standard deviations. Patients were also categorised into five groups: <1 year (infancy), 1 to 4 years (toddlerhood), 5 to 9 years (childhood), 10 to 14 years (early adolescence), and 15 to 19 years (late adolescence).
Results
During a period of eight years (from 2015 to 2022), 4,113 medical records of paediatric patients diagnosed with malignant tumours were captured, of which 126 (3.06%) were in the region of the head and neck. The analysis by gender of neoplasms located in the head and neck showed that males prevailed, with 75 (59.52%), compared to females, with 51 (40.47%). The age group with the highest cases of HNC was >4-9-year-old n=40 (31.74%), followed by >9-14-year-old n=39 (30.95%), >14-19-year-old n=35 (27.77%), and one-four-year-old n=12 (9.52%). No cases of children under one year were recorded.

The tumour frequency is represented in (Table/Fig 1). The most common types of HNC were lymphoma 78 (61.90%), sarcoma 22 (17.46%); carcinoma 14 (11.11%), and histiocytosis 10 (7.93%). The least frequent was melanoma 2 (1.58%). The histological diagnosis with the highest percentages were Hodgkin’s lymphoma with 59 (46.82%); rhabdomyosarcoma 11 (8.73%), papillary carcinoma, and histiocytosis with 10 (7.93%).

Regarding the 5-year survival of paediatric patients, it was decided to analyse only the largest tumours for a more assertive result. Papillary carcinoma and histiocytosis presented 100% survival, followed by Burkitt’s lymphoma (87.5%) and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (86.44%). The diagnosis with the lowest survival rate was rhabdomyosarcoma 7 (63.63%). Males had the highest survival rates, especially in Rhabdomyosarcoma, with 71.42%, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma (62.74%) (Table/Fig 2).

The most frequent location was the neck and lymph nodes region 84 (66.66%), with 42.06% of the tumours appearing in the cervical region, 21 (16.66%) in the neck and only 10 (7.93%) in the thyroid. The gnathic bone came in second place with 20 (15.87%) cases, where a greater predominance was observed in the mandible 11 (8.73%), followed by the maxilla 6 (4.76%). Tumours located in the oral cavity and face represented the third most affected topographic site 8 (6.34%), with a predominance of the face 4 (3.17%). Nasal cavity, paranasal sinuses, and skull base 5 (3.96%), nasopharynx 3 (2.38%), oropharynx 3 (2.38%), and salivary glands 3 (2.38%) constituted the least frequent topographies (Table/Fig 3).

The distribution of diagnosis by topographic location is represented in (Table/Fig 4). In the neck and lymph nodes region, Hodgkin’s lymphoma presented the highest rates 59 (46.82%), followed by papillary carcinoma 10 (7.93%). In odontogenic and maxillofacial bone, Ewing’s sarcoma and histiocytosis were more prevalent, both at 4.76%. In the oral cavity and face, rhabdomyosarcoma stood out as the most frequent diagnosis, with 6 (4.76%). Burkitt’s lymphoma was the tumour subtype with the greatest topographical distribution, affecting the oropharynx 3 (2.38%) and nasopharynx 1 (0.79%) most frequently, and the neck and lymph nodes 3 (2.38%) and gnathic bone 1 (0.79%) with lower percentages. Then, rhabdomyosarcoma was observed with greater coverage in the oral cavity and face 6 (4.76%) and gnathic bone 4 (3.17%) and less frequently in the paranasal sinuses and skull base 1 (0.79%).

The distribution of malignant neoplasms by age group is shown in (Table/Fig 5). Hodgkin’s lymphoma stood out as the most frequent in the age groups >4-9 years, >9-14 years, and >14-19 years. The group of patients aged 1 to 4 years was more affected by lymphomas and histiocytosis, including histiocytosis 3 (2.38%), Burkitt lymphoma 2 (1.58%), and lymphoblastic lymphoma type B 2 (1.58%). Patients aged >4-9 years were more affected by Hodgkin’s lymphoma 18 (14.28%), Ewing’s sarcoma 4 (3.17%), and Burkitt’s lymphoma 3 (2.38%). In the group aged >9-14 years, the most prevalent types of tumours were Hodgkin’s lymphoma 20 (15.87%), histiocytosis 5 (3.96%), and rhabdomyosarcoma with 4 (3.17%).
Discussion
Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) has environmental and genetic causes and can be induced by factors related to the geographic region. Childhood cancer incidence and mortality rates represent a global public health problem; however, the worldwide prevalence of HNC in paediatric patients remains unknown. The present study describes demographic and clinicopathological patterns of HNC in paediatric patients from an underdeveloped region of Brazil. In the present study, HNC was responsible for 3.06% of malignant tumours diagnosed in a period of 8 years, prevailing with higher rates in males and the age group of >4-9 years. The most frequent diagnosis were Hodgkin’s lymphoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma.

Schwartz I et al., surveyed data from 1973 to 2010, showing that out of 10,181 diagnosis of childhood HNC in the US, the most common were lymphoma (23.8%) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (23.3%) (8). The incidence of lymphoma tends to be higher in developed regions of the world because it generally develops in the context of oncogenic viruses and carcinogenic chemicals, which are more prevalent in these regions (9). In the present study, lymphoma was also indicated as the most frequent diagnosis, representing 61.90% of HNC cases found from 2015 to 2022. However, papillary thyroid carcinoma had a low incidence in our study, with 12 (7.93%). Thus, a developed country such as the United States of America (USA) presented patterns of HNC diagnosis that are similar to the patterns of a poor region of Brazil, and it is possible to observe that lymphomas also have a high percentage in third-world countries.

Regarding oncogenic viruses, there is a well-studied association between the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV), malaria infection, and the development of lymphomas. Individuals born in endemic areas, such as sub-Saharan Africa, and diagnosed with these diseases have an increased risk of lymphoid neoplasms (10),(11). According to Ajayi OF et al., the incidence of childhood HNC in Nigeria-Africa is more frequent in males, with a male-to-female ratio of 2.9:1 (12). Burkitt’s lymphoma (38.3%) was the most frequent malignant tumour. Lymphomas (53.2%) were the most common malignancy, followed by sarcomas (36.2%) and carcinomas (10.6%). The present research also showed a higher prevalence of paediatric HNC in males, 75 (59.52%), and lymphomas and carcinomas were among the three most frequent diagnosis. Therefore, it is observed that the pattern of head and neck malignancies in children in Nigeria-Africa is similar to that of the Northern Region of Brazil in terms of diagnosis and gender.

In Kolkata, India, during a 3-year study in a sample of 161 paediatric patients with HNC, it was observed that the predominant location was in the neck and lymph nodes, with lymphomas being the most common malignant lesions diagnosed (43.39%), with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma being predominant (26.41%), followed by rhabdomyosarcoma (20.75%) (13). These results corroborate the findings in northern Brazil, as lymphoma also predominated as the most common diagnosis, followed by rhabdomyosarcoma. The anatomical site with the highest percentages was also in the neck and lymph nodes region. However, when comparing the patterns, it is noted that, while in India, Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma stood out as the most common; in the North of Brazil, it was not among the most frequent, presenting only 2 (1.58%) of cases of childhood HNC.

Hodgkin’s Lymphoma has higher rates in teenagers, with an estimated 4,200 teenagers and young adults aged between 15 and 39 diagnosed with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in 2020, with 800 of these cases being between the ages of 15 and 19 (14). Englund A et al., commented in their research that of the paediatric patients reported with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in Denmark (1990-2010) and Sweden (1992-2009), children (0-9 years) less frequently presented with advanced disease than adolescents (10-17 years) (15). In this research, Hodgkin’s Lymphoma was present in the age groups 1-4 years, >4-9 years, >9-14 years, and >14-19 years, being more frequent in the more advanced age groups, >9-14 years and >14-19 years with 20 (15.87%), presenting a similar pattern to that presented by Englund A et al., (15).

In a study using the French National Registry of Childhood Cancer database, Person L et al., observed that in the French child population diagnosed with HNC, the main histological types were carcinomas (37%), especially thyroid carcinoma (26.1%), rhabdomyosarcomas (24%), and Burkitt’s lymphomas (9%), and the most affected anatomical sites were the thyroid (27%) and pharynx (17%) (16). There were discrepancies in the results of this study when compared with the results of Person L et al., since carcinomas occupied the third place among the most frequent types of HNC, representing only 11.11%, rhabdomyosarcoma presented only 8.27% of cases, and Burkitt’s lymphoma 8.73%. Regarding anatomical locations, the thyroid was the most frequent in France, and this study presented low percentages, 7.93%. The pharynx represented only 4.76%. In contrast to the European scenario, in Northern Brazil, the most affected locations were the neck and lymph nodes, leading with 66.66%, followed by odontogenic and maxillofacial bone (15.87%).

Arboleda LPA et al., surveyed the records of childhood cancer patients diagnosed with HNC at Boldrini Children’s Center in São Paulo, Brazil, during the period between 1986 and 2016 (17). The incidence was more frequent in males, with a male-to-female ratio of 1.91:1, and the age group from 10 to 14 years old had a higher prevalence of malignant tumours, followed by patients aged 5 to 9 years. Burkitt’s lymphoma (16.62%), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (13.68%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (12.81%) were the most common histopathological diagnosis. The main anatomical sites affected were the cervical region and lymph nodes (41.42%), the nasopharynx (22.89%), and the thyroid gland (6.54%). This research also showed a higher prevalence of cases of childhood HNC in males and the age group >4-9 years and >9-14 years. The most recurrent anatomical site was similar in both studies; in the present research, the neck and lymph nodes region also presented the highest rates (66.66%) with the cervical being a prominent sub-region (42.06%). However, this survey showed that the nasopharynx and thyroid were not among the most affected anatomical regions; the nasopharynx presented only 2.38% and the thyroid 7.93%. While in São Paulo, Burkitt’s lymphoma was the most prevalent histological type, in the North Region of Brazil, Hodgkin’s lymphoma was the one with the highest percentage, and Burkitt’s lymphoma was fifth with 6.34%, and rhabdomyosarcoma presented 8.73%. Therefore, concerning gender, age group, and the most prevalent anatomical site, both regions of Brazil showed similarities; however, the panorama of the most common histological types was divergent. Similar studies on the prevalence of paediatric HNC in different regions of the world in comparison with the present study results are shown in (Table/Fig 6) (8),(12),(13),(16),(17).

Mortality involving childhood neoplasms has shown a downward trend as a likely result of the increased survival probabilities accumulated in recent decades (18). Considering the overall one-year and 5-year survival rates among children with HNC, Person L et al., observed in their research that 94.2% of lymphomas had survival rates >5 years, and the subgroups of diagnosis that also had higher percentages with survival >5 years were papillary thyroid carcinoma, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, and Burkitt’s lymphoma (16). Accordingly, this research showed similar results, in which the subgroups of diagnosis with the best survival percentages were papillary thyroid carcinoma (100%), Hodgkin’s lymphoma (88.44%), and Burkitt’s lymphoma (87.5%). Therefore, it was possible to observe that, in general, HNC survival in the paediatric population in Northern Brazil was stable.

Limitation(s)

There was a short period (2015-2022) for data collection, which resulted in a low number of available medical records, limiting the present study results. An alternative would be to update the research by adding more than 10 years of data.
Conclusion
The present study showed that the prevalence of paediatric HNC was 3.06%. The most affected areas were the cervical lymph nodes followed by the oral and maxillofacial regions. The frequent age group was >4-9 years, and the common diagnosis were Hodgkin’s lymphoma, papillary thyroid carcinoma, and rhabdomyosarcoma. The diagnosis with the highest survival rates were papillary carcinoma, histiocytosis, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The present study features were comparable to studies from the United States and Africa in terms of diagnostic patterns; however, the Southeast of Brazil differed from the North in terms of the most frequent histological types. The data evaluated in the research highlighted the importance of establishing public policies for children diagnosed with HNC and supporting educational campaigns for the prevention and early diagnosis of the paediatric age group, which should be addressed in each region due to the regional disparity observed.
Reference
1.
Alvarenga Lde M, Ruiz MT, Pavarino-Bertelli ÉC, Ruback MJ, Maniglia JV, Goloni-Bertollo M. Epidemiologic evaluation of head and neck patients in a university hospital of Northwestern São Paulo State. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2008;74(1):68-73. Doi: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30753-9. PMID: 18392504; PMCID: PMC9450632.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Taweechaisupapong S, Pesee M, Aromdee C, Laopaiboon M, Khunkitti W. Efficacy of pilocarpine lozenge for post-radiation xerostomia in patients with head and neck cancer. Aust Dent J. 2006;51(4):333-37. Doi: 10.1111/j.1834- 7819.2006.tb00453.x. PMID: 17256309.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Lazarus C, Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Helenowski IB, Vonesh EF, et al. Effects of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy on tongue strength and swallowing in patients with oral cancer. Head Neck. 2007;29(7):632- 37. Doi: 10.1002/hed.20577. PMID: 17230558.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Knudson AG Jr. Genetics and the aetiology of childhood cancer. Pediatr Res. 1976;10(5):513-17. Doi: 10.1203/00006450-197605000-00001. PMID: 180483.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
Furtado MM, Sousa TO de, Wanderley AV, Pantoja LC, Filgueira SC de L. Epidemiological profile of childhood cancer in patients attended at the regional hospital of Santarém-PA in the period from 2013 to 2015—Brazilian Journal of Health Review. 2022;5(1):627-39. Doi: 10.34119/bjhrv5n1-053.   [CrossRef]
6.
Cancer diagnosis. Nurs Stand. 2015;29(21):19. Doi: 10.7748/ns.29.21.19.s25. PMID: 25605088.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Soluk-Tekkes¸ in M, Wright JM. The World Health Organization Classification of odontogenic lesions: A summary of the changes of the 2017 (4th) Edition. Turk Patoloji Derg. 2018;34(1):01-18. Doi: 10.5146/tjpath.2017.01410. PMID: 28984343.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Schwartz I, Hughes C, Brigger MT. Paediatric head and neck malignancies: Incidence and trends, 1973-2010. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(6):1127-32. Doi: 10.1177/0194599815575714. PMID: 25820588.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Bispo JAB, Pinheiro PS, Kobetz EK. Epidemiology and etiology of leukemia and lymphoma. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020;10(6):a034819. Doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a034819. PMID: 31727680; PMCID: PMC7263093.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Mawson AR, Majumdar S. Malaria, Epstein-Barr virus infection and the pathogenesis of Burkitt’s lymphoma. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(9):1849-55. Doi: 10.1002/ijc.30885. PMID: 28707393.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Wyss K, Granath F, Wångdahl A, Djärv T, Fored M, Naucler P, et al. Malaria and risk of lymphoid neoplasms and other cancer: A nationwide population-based cohort study. BMC Med. 2020;18(1):296. Doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01759-8.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Ajayi OF, Adeyemo WL, Ladeinde AL, Ogunlewe MO, Omitola OG, Effiom OA, et al. Malignant orofacial neoplasms in children and adolescents: A clinicopathologic review of cases in a Nigerian tertiary hospital. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2007;71(6):959-63. Doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2007.03.008. PMID: 17418424.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Sengupta S, Pal R. Clinicopathological correlates of paediatric head and neck cancer. J Cancer Res Ther. 2009;5(3):181-85. Doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.57123. PMID: 19841559.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Miller KD, Fidler-Benaoudia M, Keegan TH, Hipp HS, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Cancer statistics for adolescents and young adults, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(6):443-59. Doi: 10.3322/caac.21637. PMID: 32940362.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Englund A, Glimelius I, Rostgaard K, Smedby KE, Eloranta S, Molin D, et al. Hodgkin lymphoma in children, adolescents and young adults - A comparative study of clinical presentation and treatment outcome. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(2):276- 82. Doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1355563. PMID: 28760045.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Person L, Lacour B, Faure L, Guissou S, Poulalhon C, Orbach D, et al. Childhood head and neck cancer in France: Incidence, survival, and trends from 2000 to 2015. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;150:110858. Doi: 10.1016/j. ijporl.2021.110858. PMID: 34388659.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Arboleda LPA, Hoffmann IL, Cardinalli IA, Santos-Silva AR, de Mendonça RMH. Demographic and clinicopathologic distribution of head and neck malignant tumours in paediatric patients from a Brazilian population: A retrospective study. J Oral Pathol Med. 2018;47(7):696-705. Doi: 10.1111/jop.12724. PMID: 29729040.
18.
Braga PE, Latorre Md Mdo R, Curado MP. Childhood cancer: A comparative analysis of incidence, mortality, and survival in Goiania (Brazil) and other countries (1989-1996). 2002;18(1):33-44. Doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2002000100004. PMID: 11910422.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/70177.19545

Date of Submission: Feb 22, 2024
Date of Peer Review: Mar 26, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Apr 24, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? No
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 23, 2024
• Manual Googling: Mar 29, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 23, 2024 (9%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com