JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 1174

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : June | Volume : 18 | Issue : 6 | Page : ED01 - ED04 Full Version

Case of an Intramedullary Ancient Schwannoma of the Brainstem Mimicking Astrocytoma: A Rare Clinical Presentation with a Diagnostic Dilemma

Published: June 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67903.19466

Prajna Das, Mukesh Kumar Pradhan, Ruchi Mittal, Kanaklata Dash, Narendra Kumar Das

1. Professor, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 2. Postgraduate Student, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 3. Professor, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 4. Professor, Department of Pathology, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India. 5. Professor, Department of Neurosurgery, Kalinga Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Prajna Das,
Plot No. 784/786, Lane 3, Jaydev Vihar, Bhubaneswar-751013, Odisha, India.
E-mail: prajnadas68@gmail.com

Abstract

Schwannomas are common benign tumours arising from the myelin sheath of peripheral nerves. These tumours are usually located in the intradural and extramedullary regions. The common sites are cervical (58%) and thoracic region (32%), followed by the lumbar region (10%). Intramedullary location is rare and if present, is usually associated with neurofibromatosis 1 and 2 (NF-1 and 2). Intramedullary brainstem schwannomas without NF are uncommon, and to the best of the authors’ knowledge, only 19 cases have been reported to date. It was first described by James Watson Kernohan, an Irish-American pathologist, in 1931. The rarity of these tumours in this location is due to the absence of Schwann cells in this area. There are several hypotheses postulating the presence of these tumours in this location. The exact cause is not yet known. The authors here present a case of intramedullary brainstem ancient schwannoma with an unusual clinicoradiological presentation, which raised suspicion of Glioma with the possibility of Astrocytoma. The patient presented with right-sided neck stiffness and shoulder pain for a period of four months. Total excision of the tumour was performed, and the postoperative period was uneventful with clinical improvement in the patient. Histomorphology raised the suspicion of a tumour of glial origin with the possibility of Astrocytoma; Immunohistochemistry (IHC) helped in reaching the definitive diagnosis of Ancient Schwannoma. Thus, a combined approach of clinicoradiological, as well as histomorphology and IHC, is essential for a definitive diagnosis of these tumours. Future multicentric studies are required to elucidate the pathogenesis of the location of these tumours.

Keywords

Histopathology, Immunohistochemistry, Intradural

Case Report
A 46-year-old male presented to the neurosurgery outpatient department with chief complaints of right-sided somatic as well as neuralgic shoulder pain and neck tightness for four months, associated with a two-month history of headaches. There was no significant family history. He was admitted to the neurosurgery ward for further evaluation. Physical examination revealed stable vitals with a Glasgow Coma Scale of E4V5M6. Bilateral pupils were of the same size and reactive to light with normal vision in both eyes. The muscles in all four limbs had normal power, but the power of the trapezius muscle was 4/5. Based on these clinical features, a Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (CE-MRI) of the spine was advised, which showed an exophytic, lobulated, peripherally enhancing lesion involving the posterior part of the right hemimedulla and the cervicomedullary junction with mild extension to the upper cervical part (Table/Fig 1). The provisional radiological diagnosis was astrocytoma. The complete blood count, liver function test, and renal function tests were within normal limits. All other routine investigations were normal, and there was no abnormality on the chest X-ray. Surgery was planned, and a total excision of the tumour along with the C1 arch was performed by midline suboccipital craniotomy. The excised specimen was sent to the Department of Pathology for histopathological evaluation. The tissue was received in multiple pieces. About 3-μm thick formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were prepared, and Haematoxylin and Eosin stained sections were examined. Histopathological examination of the biopsy tissue showed tumour fragments with partial circumscription. There were predominantly cellular areas with small foci of hypocellularity (Table/Fig 2)a. Focal microcystic areas were also seen (Table/Fig 2)b. The tumour cells were arranged mostly in diffuse sheets and vague fascicles. These cells were ovoid to polygonal to spindled, having a moderate amount of fibrillary cytoplasm and indistinct cell outlines. The cellular areas showed a moderate degree of nuclear pleomorphism, dense nuclear chromatin, and inconspicuous nucleoli (Table/Fig 2)c. There were interspersed hyalinized blood vessels (Table/Fig 2)a. The mitotic count was 1/10 HPF. Endothelial cell proliferation and necrosis were not present. With these morphological features, a differential diagnosis of glioma (anaplastic astrocytoma), ancient Schwannoma, and cellular meningioma was considered. IHC was advised for further typing of the tumour. It revealed negative expression of Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA) and patchy (15%) expression of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein (GFAP) (Table/Fig 3)a,b. The tumour cells showed diffuse and strong expression of S100 and SOX10 (Table/Fig 3)c,d. Ki-67 showed a proliferation index of 2-3% [Table/Fig-3e]. The diagnosis of intramedullary ancient Schwannoma of the brainstem was confirmed. The patient was managed conservatively, and the postoperative period was uneventful. He was discharged in a haemodynamically stable condition with no neurological deficits. He is doing well at about 10 months of follow-up.
Discussion
Spinal tumours comprise 15% of all Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours (1). Intradural and extramedullary schwannomas of the spinal cord account for about 10% of all spinal tumours (1). Intraparenchymal as well as intramedullary locations of schwannomas are extraordinarily rare (2). They comprise 1.1% of spinal schwannomas and 0.3% of intraspinal tumours (3). Intramedullary schwannoma was first described by James Watson Kernohan, an Irish American Pathologist, in 1931 (4). Penfield described the second case in 1932 (5). According to Navarro Fernández JO et al., the last literature review in 2018 revealed 70 cases of intramedullary schwannoma (6). Liang X et al., searched the English literature up to 2019 and found only 19 cases of intramedullary brainstem schwannomas (Table/Fig 4) (7),(8),(9),(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19),(20),(21),(22).

Due to the rare location seen in radiology, these tumours might be misdiagnosed preoperatively as gliomas, leading to inappropriate management (23). A judicious and comprehensive clinicoradiological analysis with histomorphological and immunohistochemical correlation, including a high index of suspicion, is the best way to reach a definitive diagnosis. Total resection of the tumour is the most beneficial treatment. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy is still not clear. In the present study, authors report a rare case of cervical intramedullary brainstem schwannoma which was suspected as a case of high-grade glioma clinicoradiologically. Combined histopathology along with IHC helped in the diagnosis of ancient schwannoma.

Schwannomas are benign, slow-growing tumours of myelin sheath origin. The common location is intradural and extramedullary. They are usually found in an extra-axial location in periventricular and cerebellar regions. The most common sites are the cervical region (58%) and thoracic region (32%), followed by the lumbar region (10%). An intra-axial location is extremely rare, particularly in the intramedullary brainstem (21),(22). The rarity of intramedullary schwannoma is due to the absence of Schwann cells in the brain parenchyma. Several hypotheses suggest the aetiopathogenesis of the intramedullary location of schwannoma. These include: a) Migration of schwann cells during embryogenesis; b) Transformation of multipotent stem cells of neuroectodermal origin into Schwann cells; c) schwann cell proliferation after injury; d) Ensheathment of schwann cells over aberrant intramedullary nerve fibers; e) Extension of schwann cells along the perivascular nerve plexus of the intramedullary region (2),(3),(24).

Schwannomas have several histomorphological variants, such as classical or conventional, cellular, plexiform, ancient, epithelioid, and melanotic (25). The third most common variant is ancient schwannoma, comprising <1% of all schwannomas (26). Ackerman and Taylor described the clear hypocellular areas in schwannomas as a degenerative change due to the long-standing duration of the tumour (27). They coined these tumours as ancient schwannomas (27). The histopathology of ancient schwannoma reveals mild patchy nuclear pleomorphism and hyperchromasia, along with degenerative changes like cystic areas and hyalinised blood vessels (25). The atypical morphology of tumour cells mentioned above might raise suspicion of malignancy (25). However, the absence of necrosis, diffuse atypia, capsular or vascular invasion, with no increase in mitotic figures, indicates the benign nature of the tumour (25). The biological behaviour of these tumours is similar to the conventional variant (27). These are slow-growing tumours with a low recurrence rate. Intramedullary schwannomas may be misdiagnosed as gliomas like ependymoma or astrocytoma because of their location and radiologically heterogeneous appearance (28),(29). Wu L et al., compared the clinical presentations of intramedullary tumours, comprising 173 cases of ependymomas, 70 cases of astrocytomas, and seven cases of schwannomas from 2003 to 2010, and reported somatic and neuralgic pain as one of the significant initial symptoms in schwannoma compared to astrocytoma and ependymoma (23).

A similar case report was published by Darwish BS et al., in May 2002 (30). The case involved a 68-year-old female presenting with severe progressive cervical myelopathy, paraesthesia, weakness, and spasticity causing deteriorated gait. MRI findings suggested an intramedullary vascular malformation. Histopathology revealed features of ancient schwannoma. IHC showed S100 positivity and GFAP negativity. However, in present case, the histomorphology was not very clear as there were more cellular areas mimicking a tumour of glial origin. IHC confirmed the tumour as an ancient schwannoma.

The prognosis of these tumours is good. Total excision of the tumour is the best treatment for these cases, with drastic clinical improvement after surgery (23),(28),(29). Recurrence is usually not observed after near-total excision of the tumour. Therefore, the role of the pathologist is crucial in these cases. Careful histopathological study, along with correlation with clinical features, radiological findings, and IHC, helps in making a definitive diagnosis and determining postoperative treatment. Informed consent was obtained from the patient before surgery and postoperative histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis.
Conclusion
Schwannomas are slow-growing benign tumours with a rare intramedullary location and complete functional recovery post excision. They do not have pathognomonic clinical signs and symptoms to differentiate them from other intramedullary tumours; however, the possibility of intramedullary schwannoma should always be considered when a middle-aged patient presents with a history of chronic somatic and neuralgic pain and has a medullary lesion in the cervical or thoracic spine. Furthermore, a combined approach of clinical features with radiological findings, histopathological, and immunohistochemical evaluation can help in reaching a proper diagnosis.
Reference
1.
Ottenhausen M, Ntoulias G, Bodhinayake I, Ruppert FH, Schreiber S, Förschler A, et al. Intradural spinal tumours in adults- Update on management and outcome. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42(2):371-88.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Binatli O, Ersahin Y, Korkmaz O, Bayol U. Intramedullary schwannoma of the spinal cord: A case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci. 1999;43(2):163.
3.
Ross DA, Edwards MS, Wilson CB. Intramedullary neurilemomas of the spinal cord: Report of two cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1986;19(3):458-64.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Kernohan JW, Woltman HW, Adson AW. Intramedullary tumors of the spinal cord a review of fifty-one cases, with an attempt at histologic classification. Arch Neurol Psychiatry. 1931;25(4):679-701.   [CrossRef]
5.
Penfield W. Notes on operative technician neurosurgery. Ann Surg. 1946;124(2):383-85.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Navarro Fernández JO, Monroy Sosa A, CachoDíaz B, Arrieta VA, Ortíz Leyva RU, Cano Valdez AM, et al. Cervical intramedullary schwannoma: Case report and review of the literature. Case Rep Neurol. 2018;10(1):18-24.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Liang X, Shi W, Wang X, Qin J, Wang L, Wu X, et al. Brainstem schwannoma: A case report and review of clinical and imaging features. Int J Radiat Res. 2020;18(3):605-10.
8.
Prakash B, Roy S, Tandon PN. Schwannoma of the brain stem: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1980;53(1):121-23.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Aryanpur J, Long DM. Schwannoma of the medulla oblongata: Case report. J Neurosurg. 1988;69(3):446-49.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Ladouceur D, Bergeron D, Lamarche JB, Lamontagne L. Cystic schwannoma of the brainstem. Can J Neurol Sci. 1989;16(3):357-60.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Sharma V, Newton G. Schwannoma of the medulla oblongata. Br J Neurosurg. 1993;7(4):427-29.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Tanabe M, Miyata H, Okamoto H, Watanabe T, Hori T, Masakawa A, et al. Brainstem schwannoma- Case report. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica. 1996;36(12):880-83.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Sharma MC, Karak AK, Gaikwad SB, Mahapatra AK, Mehta VS, Sudha K. Intracranial intraparenchymal schwannomas: A series of eight cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;60(2):200.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Lee SH, Yoo H, Lee JH, Cho KJ, Rhee CH, Jang JS, et al. Multiple intraparenchymal schwannomas in the cerebellum, brainstem, and cervical spinal cord. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1999;141:779-80.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Muzzafar S, Ketonen L, Weinberg JS, Schellingerhout D. Imaging and clinical features of an intra-axial brain stem schwannoma. Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(3):567-69.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Srivastav A, Tungaria A, Kumar R, Sahu R. Intraparenchymal schwannoma of brainstem in a pediatric patient. Neurology India. 2011;59(6):924.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Konovalov AN, Pitskhelauri DI, Shishkina LV, Kopachev DN, Sanikidze AZ, Gavriushin AV, et al. Intraparenchymal brainstem schwannomas: Report of three cases and literature review. Zh Vopr NeirokhirIm NN Burdenko. 2013;77(2):35-43.
18.
Sharma AK, Savardekar AR, Nandeesh BN, Arivazhagan A, Rao MB. Intrinsic brainstem schwannoma–A rare clinical entity and a histological enigma. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2016;7(02):302-04.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Zhang Q, Ni M, Liu WM, Jia W, Jia GJ, Zhang JT. Intra-and extramedullary dumbbell-shaped schwannoma of the medulla oblongata: A case report and review of the literature. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:873-e1.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Gao Y, Qin Z, Li D, Yu W, Sun L, Liu N, et al. Intracerebral schwannoma: A case report and literature review. Oncology Letters. 2018;16(2):2501-10.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Lin J, Feng H, Li F, Zhao B, Guo Q. Intraparenchymal schwannoma of the medulla oblongata: Case report. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(3):621-24.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
22.
Ramos AA, Vega MA, Valencia HS, García JC, Perez VC. Intraparenchymal schwannoma involving the brainstem in a young woman. Pediatric Neurology. 2013;48(6):472-74.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
Wu L, Yao N, Chen D, Deng X, Xu Y. Preoperative diagnosis of intramedullary spinal schwannomas. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica. 2011;51(9):630-34.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Yang T, Wu L, Deng X, Yang C, Xu Y. Clinical features and surgical outcomes of intramedullary schwannomas. Actaneurochirurgica. 2014;156:1789-97.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
25.
Russell DS, Rubinstein LJ. Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System. 2nd ed E. Arnold; 1963:23-34.
26.
Azli MS, Rahman IG, Salzihan MM. Ancient schwannoma of the conus medullaris. Med J Malays. 2007;62(3):256-58.
27.
Shilpa B. Ancient schwannoma-A rare case. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2012;22(3):215-28.
28.
Gao L, Sun B, Han F, Jin Y, Zhang J. Magnetic resonance imaging features of intramedullary schwannomas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2017;41(1):137-40.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
29.
Dai LM, Qiu Y, Cen B, Lv J. Intramedullary schwannoma of cervical spinal cord presenting inconspicuous enhancement with gadolinium. World Neurosurg. 2019;127:418-22.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
30.
Darwish BS, Balakrishnan V, Maitra R. Intramedullary ancient schwannoma of the cervical spinal cord: Case report and review of literature. J Clin Neurosci. 2002;9(3):321-23.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67903.19466

Date of Submission: Oct 06, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Dec 23, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Feb 22, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 26, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Feb 20, 2024 (12%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com