JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 7385

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : June | Volume : 18 | Issue : 6 | Page : BC01 - BC06 Full Version

Effect of Rosuvastatin on Oxidative Stress in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Prospective Interventional Study

Published: June 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/67904.19491

M Keerthi Thej, Aparna R Bitla, PVLNSrinivasa Rao, Alok Sachan

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Biochemistry, ACSR Government Medical College, Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. 2. Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 3. Senior Professor, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Balaji Medical College, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India. 4. Professor and Head, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Aparna R Bitla,
Professor and Head, Department of Biochemistry, Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati-517501, Andhra Pradesh, India.
E-mail: aparnabitla@yahoo.co.in

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is an established risk factor for Cardiovascular Disease (CVD). Oxidative Stress (OS) and inflammation are linked to CVD in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Rosuvastatin is a statin of choice in patients at high cardiovascular risk due to its pharmacokinetic efficacy as well as patient safety. There is limited data on the effect of rosuvastatin on OS among Indian subjects with T2DM.

Aim: To assess the effect of rosuvastatin 20 mg for 12 weeks on oxidant and antioxidant status in patients with T2DM.

Materials and Methods: This prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry at Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India, from March 2018 to February 2019. A total of 24 patients diagnosed with T2DM were included in the study and were administered rosuvastatin tablets (20 mg/day) orally for a period of 12 weeks. The oxidant markers {Malondialdehyde (MDA) and Protein Carbonyl Content (PCC)} and antioxidant markers {Ferric Reducing Ability of Plasma (FRAP) and protein thiols} were analysed spectrophotometrically using standard methods. Paired samples t-test/Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was used as appropriate for the comparison of markers at baseline and after 12 weeks of rosuvastatin intervention. The association between markers studied was assessed using linear regression with the Generalised Estimating Equations (GEE).

Results: The mean age of the study subjects was 48.04±7.96 years. There were 17 male patients (70.8%). Rosuvastatin 20 mg/day showed a lipid-lowering effect {Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglyceride (TG), Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)}, an increase in the antioxidant and anti-atherogenic Hi-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). It also showed a beneficial effect on OS markers as evidenced by a significant decrease in oxidant markers MDA (-9.06%), PCC (-21.2%) (p<0.05) and an increase in antioxidant markers FRAP (+9.08%) and protein thiols (+11.8%) (p<0.05) 12 weeks after treatment in patients with T2DM. A change in LDL-C was positively associated with a change in MDA and PCC in patients with diabetes postintervention (p<0.001).

Conclusion: The findings of the present study suggest that rosuvastatin 20 mg for 12 weeks produces a beneficial effect on CV risk in patients with T2DM. The decrease in OS and the LDL-C levels can thus decrease the formation of oxidised LDL, which initiates the atherosclerotic process.

Keywords

Cardiovascular risk, Lipid profile, Protein carbonyl content, Protein thiols, Statin

Introduction
The DM is a chronic metabolic disorder and an established risk factor for CVD. Over 65% of patients with diabetes die from some form of heart disease or stroke (1). The prevalence of diabetes in India is increasing, with the overall reported prevalence of 7.3% and the prevalence of prediabetes being 10.3% or 24.7% (2) based on World Health Organisation (WHO) (3) or the Adenosine Deaminase (ADA) criteria, respectively (4). The majority of subjects in South Asia and India develop diabetes at a younger age (<50 years) compared to the Caucasian population (>58 years). Additionally, South Asians have been shown to be at a higher risk of developing macrovascular complications like coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease compared to Caucasians (5),(6), thus warranting intense therapy directed at controlling DM and reducing risk factors.

The OS and inflammation are important novel risk factors for CVD in T2DM (7),(8),(9). These play an important role in the initiation and evolution of atherosclerosis from endothelial dysfunction to clinical events (7). Excess reactive oxygen species cause peroxidation of lipids, resulting in the formation of highly reactive aldehydes, such as MDA, which is documented as a primary biomarker for free radical-mediated lipid damage and OS (10). Oxidative cleavage of the protein backbone and direct oxidation of amino acids result in the formation of protein carbonyls (11).

Under normal conditions, the effect of oxygen-free radical production is largely nullified by a network of antioxidant defense systems. Antioxidants are substances that significantly delay or inhibit the rate of oxidative damage to target molecules and mainly include enzymatic and non enzymatic components (12). Enzymatic antioxidants comprise Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), Catalase (CAT), Glutathione Peroxidase (GPx), and Glutathione Reductase (GR), whereas non enzymatic antioxidants include low molecular weight compounds such as reduced Glutathione (GSH), albumin, bilirubin, Uric Acid (UA), selenium, vitamins C, E, and carotenoids (12). Thiols are involved in a number of chemical reactions that give thiol-containing molecules, which play a primary role in cellular redox homeostasis. The FRAP assay is a method of assessing total antioxidant power and is used as an index of the antioxidant potential of the body (13).

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) recommended statins regardless of baseline lipid levels in diabetic patients with CVD or who are over the age of 40 years and have one or more CVD risk factors (14). The major effects of statins are to decrease the number of all atherogenic apolipoprotein B (apo-B) containing lipoprotein particles and raise levels of HDL cholesterol. In addition, statins also possess pleiotropic effects, which include anti-inflammatory and antioxidative properties (15),(16).

Various studies have reported a decrease in oxidant and antioxidant markers following treatment with atorvastatin (17),(18), simvastatin (19),(20),(21), and rosuvastatin (22),(23). However, a review of the literature shows that there are no studies on the effect of statins on the oxidant marker PCC and antioxidant markers FRAP and thiols in patients with DM. Thus, there is a need to further evaluate the effect of statins in patients with T2DM, especially with respect to its effects on OS; one of the fundamental mechanisms underlying atherogenesis.

Among the available statins, rosuvastatin is considered to be a statin of choice in patients at high cardiovascular risk due to its pharmacokinetic efficacy as well as patient safety (24),(25). There is limited data on the antioxidant effect of rosuvastatin in patients with T2DM (22),(23). Data on the antioxidant effects of rosuvastatin in Indian subjects are lacking, thus warranting studies.

Hence, the present study was taken up to assess the effect of rosuvastatin on oxidant and antioxidant markers in patients with T2DM.
Material and Methods
The present prospective interventional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry at a tertiary care teaching hospital in South India (Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh, India) from March 2018 to February 2019. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (no. 751/dated: 02.04.2018) and registered with the Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2018/07/14771).

Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with T2DM aged between 40 and 70 years as per the revised ADA criteria (4), LDL-C levels over 75 mg/dL (14), and willing to participate were included in the study after obtaining written informed consent. The study included consecutive patients attending the outpatient services of the Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Exclusion criteria: Those having other forms of diabetes, on insulin therapy, on pioglitazone, thyroid disorders not on treatment, those with liver and kidney diseases, other inflammatory diseases, acute illness, malignancy, alcoholics, current smokers, those on lipid-lowering drugs, and those unwilling to participate were excluded from the study.

Sample size calculation: Sample size calculation was done based on previous studies [17,22], taking into consideration the pretest and post-test mean and standard deviations, with a power of 80%, an alpha error of 5%, and a two-sided distribution of data. The nMaster software version 2.0 designed by the Department of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India, was used for this purpose. A sample size of 14 was obtained. However, to strengthen the findings of the study and to account for dropouts, a sample size of 30 was decided for the present study.

Among the 314 cases screened, 60 cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. The reasons for exclusion (n=254) were as follows: age over 70 years (n=33), patients with documented Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) (n=37), patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) (n=42), alcoholic and/or smokers (n=64), patients on insulin therapy (n=58), and those on statin therapy (n=20). Among these 60 cases, 25 subjects refused to participate after recruitment into the study. The study was initiated in 35 subjects. Among these, six patients did not agree to continue in the study, and five patients dropped out of the study (three patients stopped using statins as they were not satisfied with the statins, while two patients were lost to follow-up). Thus, 24 patients continued in the study to completion (Table/Fig 1).

Study Procedure

Details of medical history and current treatment were collected using a predefined structured proforma. Blood pressure, height, and weight were recorded. Body Mass Index (BMI) was calculated using the formula weight in kg/height in m2. Waist circumference was measured using a non-elastic tape at a point midway between the lower border of the rib cage and the iliac crest and noted to the nearest half-centimetre. The patient was advised to take one tablet of rosuvastatin 20 mg/day (Med Manor Organics Pvt. Ltd., Uttarakhand, India) orally for a period of 12 weeks (26). Compliance was verified over the phone.

After 12 hours of overnight fasting, 5 mL of peripheral venous blood samples were collected from all the study subjects at baseline and after 12 weeks of rosuvastatin treatment. One millilitre of blood was transferred into a test tube containing sodium fluoride and potassium oxalate (in a 1:3 ratio of 20 mg/5 mL) anticoagulant and centrifuged at 3000 rotations per minute (rpm) for five minutes to obtain the plasma. Four millilitres were transferred into additive-free tubes, allowed to stand for 30 minutes for clot formation, following which they were centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 minutes to obtain serum. Plasma samples were analysed immediately for plasma glucose levels. Serum samples were aliquoted into appropriately labeled vials and stored at -80°C in a deep freezer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) until analysis. The details of the methods and analysers used are shown in (Table/Fig 2) (4),(13),(27),(28),(29),(30),(32).

Statistical Analysis

Data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Data obtained were expressed as mean±standard deviation for normal data and as median (interquartile range) for non normal data. Paired samples t-test/Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test was used as appropriate for the comparison of markers at baseline and after 12 weeks of rosuvastatin intervention. The data were transformed to percentages, with the baseline value set at 100%, to nullify the effect of age, BMI, and gender which can affect the baseline oxidant parameters. The changes in markers after follow-up were calculated accordingly with the baseline set at 100%. The association between the markers studied was assessed using linear regression with the GEE, which groups repeated measures for each subject and accounts for correlations that may occur from multiple observations within subjects. All statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Windows version 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and Microsoft Excel spreadsheets (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). A two-sided p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Among the 314 cases screened, 60 cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected. A total of 24 patients continued in the study to completion. The mean age of the study subjects was 48.04±7.96 years. There were 17 male patients (70.8%). The mean BMI was 26.6±2.2 kg/m2. The mean systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 131.9±8.7 mmHg and 85.6±5.4 mmHg, respectively. Among the study participants, 22 (92%) were on treatment with metformin, 1 (4%) on glycomet, while the remaining 1 (4%) was on ayurvedic treatment at the time of recruitment and was put on metformin later. The treatment of the patients (antidiabetic and statin) was stable during the 12-week follow-up period (Table/Fig 3).

Intervention with rosuvastatin 20 mg/day produced a significant decrease in total cholesterol, TG, LDL-C levels, and a significant increase in HDL-C levels after 12 weeks of follow-up. The percentage reductions were 8.40±3.25% (p<0.001) for TC, 9.13±5.56% (p<0.001) for TG, and 17.0±5.6% (p<0.001) for LDL, while the percentage increase in HDL-C levels was 12.5±6.95% (Table/Fig 4).

In the present study, rosuvastatin 20 mg for 12 weeks produced a beneficial effect on oxidant markers MDA and PCC, as evidenced by a significant decrease in these markers after 12 weeks of intervention compared to baseline. The percentage decrease in MDA was 9.06±3.12% (p<0.001), while that for carbonyl content was 21.2±14.37% (p<0.001).

A significant increase in antioxidant markers FRAP and protein thiols was seen in patients with T2DM after 12 weeks of intervention with rosuvastatin 20 mg compared to baseline (Table/Fig 4). The percentage increase in FRAP and thiols were 9.08±7.6% (p<0.001) and 11.8±8.4% (p<0.001), respectively (Table/Fig 5).

To study the association of changes in OS markers with changes in serum lipids, linear regression was performed using the GEE. The model with the best goodness of fit was selected. In patients with diabetes post-intervention, a change in LDL-C was associated with a change in MDA and PCC. Similarly, a change in TG was associated with PCC levels (Table/Fig 6).

All 24 patients were assessed for the safety of rosuvastatin and the development of adverse drug events. None of the patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events known for rosuvastatin, including constipation, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, headache, and nausea. None of the patients had myopathy as assessed by the clinician.
Discussion
In the present study, treatment with rosuvastatin 20 mg for a period of 12 weeks caused a reduction in TC, TG, LDL-C levels, and an increase in HDL-C levels. The lipid-lowering effect of rosuvastatin has been demonstrated in previous studies (33),(34),(35),(36). However, the percentage change reported has been different. This difference can be attributed to the dose used, duration of treatment, and the cause of dyslipidemia and baseline lipid levels in the population studied. A recent meta-analysis concluded that rosuvastatin was the most effective statin in decreasing LDL-C and non-HDL-C (36). Statins, including rosuvastatin, produce reductions in TC and LDL-C through the inhibition of the Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase enzyme and increasing the expression of LDL receptors, thereby increasing the uptake of LDL-C from circulation.

The beneficial effects of statins in CVD risk have been attributed to their lipid as well as non lipid effects. These non-lipid effects are termed as pleiotropic effects, which include the reduction of OS, inflammation, improvement in endothelial function, among others (15),(16),(37). Patients with DM have increased OS, which occurs due to an increased generation of ROS as a result of hyperglyacaemia-induced increased production of superoxide production, which, in turn, causes the activation of alternate metabolic pathways, namely increased flux of glucose through the polyol pathway, increased formation of Advanced Glycation End-products (AGEs), increased expression of the receptor for AGEs and its activating ligands, activation of Protein Kinase C (PKC) isoforms, and overactivity of the hexosamine pathway (38). OS plays a major role in the development of macrovascular and microvascular complications in patients with diabetes (38).

In line with the observations made in experimental models, rosuvastatin intervention was found to produce a significant decrease in the levels of oxidant markers, MDA (9.06%), and protein carbonyls (21.2%) in the present study. These findings are in agreement with previous studies (17),(18),(19),(20). Villegas-Rivera et al., reported a significant reduction in MDA and PCC after the administration of rosuvastatin 20 mg/day for 16 weeks in patients with diabetic nephropathy (20).

In a study by Manfredini V et al., dyslipidemic T2DM patients not treated with simvastatin had significantly higher plasma MDA and PCC compared to dyslipidemic T2DM patients treated with simvastatin (19). In an Indian study by Save V et al., atorvastatin was found to significantly decrease MDA levels and the lipoprotein profile in patients with type 2 diabetes (17). Similar reductions in MDA levels were observed by Usharani P et al., in patients with type 2 diabetes who received atorvastatin in their study (Table/Fig 7) (18).

Rosuvastatin has been shown to attenuate OS in diabetic rats by suppressing Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Phosphate Hydrogen (NADPH) oxidase, a multisubunit enzyme that catalyses the reduction of molecular oxygen to form the superoxide anion O2¯. The superoxide radicals can cause the uncoupling of endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase (eNOS) and decrease the bioavailability of nitric oxide. These mechanisms have been linked to cardiovascular disorders seen in hypertension, endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis, diabetes, etc. Rosuvastatin has been shown to attenuate eNOS uncoupling, increase the bioavailability of NO, and decrease OS in endothelial cells. The findings of the present study thus support these observations of the protective role of rosuvastatin in patients with diabetes (39).

Two antioxidants, FRAP and protein thiols, were studied in the present study. FRAP represents the reducing power of plasma constituents contributed by low molecular weight antioxidants, including antioxidant vitamins C and E, serum bilirubin, and serum UA. Hence, FRAP provides a reliable index of the antioxidant capacity that can be provided by individual antioxidant measurements. Protein thiols represent the antioxidant power of the sulfhydryl groups present on plasma proteins, which act as chain-breaking antioxidants. Albumin is the major thiol-containing protein due to its concentration along with other proteins like cysteine, homocysteine, and GSH (40).

A significant increase in antioxidant markers, FRAP, and protein thiols was seen in patients with T2DM after 12 weeks of rosuvastatin 20 mg treatment compared to baseline (Table/Fig 5). These findings are in agreement with previous studies in experimental models using rosuvastatin (23) and with other statins in patients with diabetes (19),(22). In an experimental study, Deng J et al., reported that rosuvastatin 10 mg/kg/day for five days decreased oxidative damage as evidenced by an increase in thiols and a decrease in MDA and carbonyl content in diabetic rats (23). Similarly, Manfredini V et al., showed that simvastatin treatment increased plasma thiol content in dyslipidemic T2DM patients (19). However, Pereira EC et al., failed to show a beneficial effect of simvastatin on antioxidant status (Table/Fig 7) (17),(18),(20),(21),(22).

An improvement in FRAP and thiols can be supported by the effect of rosuvastatin seen in experimental studies. The antioxidant defence protein heme oxygenase-1 degrades the prooxidant heme and produces carbon monoxide and antioxidant bilirubin (41). Bilirubin has potent antioxidant power and is a component of the FRAP. Rosuvastatin has been shown to upregulate heme oxygenase-1 and thus increases its metabolite bilirubin. Addition of exogenous bilirubin was shown to completely abolish NADPH oxidase-dependent ROS production (42). The improvement in protein thiols is supported by the observation of rosuvastatin-induced increased expression of thiol group-containing enzymes, i.e., GSH synthase, GPx, GR, and the enzymes involved in GSH synthesis (43).

Thus, the pleiotropic effects of rosuvastatin observed in experimental models are supported by the findings of the present study. Furthermore, these effects are associated with the lipid-lowering effect of rosuvastatin. Changes in lipids showed an association with oxidative markers (Table/Fig 6), showing that a decrease in lipids, which form the major substrates for oxidant injury, causes a decrease in oxidant markers. Long-term prospective clinical trials are required to establish the role of the pleiotropic effects in decreasing CV endpoints in patients with T2DM.

Limitation(s)

The major limitation in the present study was the lack of a control group. Additionally, advanced lipid parameters were not assessed in the present study.
Conclusion
The findings of the present study suggest that high-intensity statin, i.e., rosuvastatin 20 mg for 12 weeks, produces a beneficial effect on CV risk in patients with T2DM through its lipid and non-lipid effects. Rosuvastatin showed a lipid-lowering effect (?TC, TG, LDL), an increase in the antioxidant and anti-atherogenic HDL, and decreasing OS by causing a decrease in lipid and protein oxidation markers and an increase in antioxidants. The decrease in OS and the LDL-C levels can thus decrease the formation of oxidised LDL, which initiates the atherosclerotic process. The findings need to be further strengthened in a large trial.
Reference
1.
Go AS, Mozaffarian D, Roger VL, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Blaha MJ, et al; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2014 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2014;129(3):e28-e292.
2.
Anjana RM, Deepa M, Pradeepa R, Mahanta J, Narain K, Das HK, et al; ICMR-INDIAB Collaborative Study Group. Prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes in 15 states of India: Results from the ICMR-INDIAB population-based cross-sectional study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(8):585-96. Erratum in: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5(8):e5.
3.
WHO. Definition and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate hyperglycaemia: Report of a WHO/IDF consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2006.
4.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2018. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(Supplement_1):S13-27.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
Chowdhury TA, Lasker SS. Complications and cardiovascular risk factors in South Asians and Europeans with early-onset type 2 diabetes. QJM. 2002;95(4):241-46.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Clarke PM, Glasziou P, Patel A, Chalmers J, Woodward M, Harrap SB, et al; ADVANCE Collaborative Group. Event rates, hospital utilization, and costs associated with major complications of diabetes: A multicountry comparative analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7(2):e1000236.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
7.
Raynor LA, Pankow JS, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Hoogeveen RC, Pereira MA, et al. Novel risk factors and the prediction of type 2 diabetes in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(1):70-76.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Newsholme P, Haber EP, Hirabara SM, Rebelato EL, Procopio J, Morgan D, et al. Diabetes associated cell stress and dysfunction: Role of mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial ROS production and activity. J Physiol. 2007;583(Pt 1):09-24.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Keane KN, Cruzat VF, Carlessi R, de Bittencourt PI Jr, Newsholme P. Molecular events linking oxidative stress and inflammation to insulin resistance and β-Cell dysfunction. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:181643.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Nielsen F, Mikkelsen BB, Nielsen JB, Andersen HR, Grandjean P. Plasma malondialdehyde as biomarker for oxidative stress: Reference interval and effects of life-style factors. Clin Chem. 1997;43(7):1209-14.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
11.
Dalle-Donne I, Giustarini D, Colombo R, Rossi R, Milzani A. Protein carbonylation in human diseases. Trends Mol Med. 2003;9(4):169-76.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Young IS, Woodside JV. Antioxidants in health and disease. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54(3):176-86.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Benzie IF, Strain JJ. The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: The FRAP assay. Anal Biochem. 1996;239(1):70-76.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, et al; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl2):S1-45. Erratum in: Circulation. 2014;129(25 Suppl 2):S46-48. Erratum in: Circulation. 2015;132(25):e396.   [CrossRef]
15.
Aviram M, Hussein O, Rosenblat M, Schlezinger S, Hayek T, Keidar S. Interactions of platelets, macrophages, and lipoproteins in hypercholesterolemia: Antiatherogenic effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor therapy. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1998;31(1):39-45.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Takemoto M, Liao JK. Pleiotropic effects of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001;21(11):1712-19.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
17.
Save V, Patil N, Moulik N, Rajadhyaksha G. Effect of atorvastatin on type 2 diabetic dyslipidemia. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2006;11(4):262-70.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
18.
Usharani P, Mateen AA, Naidu MU, Raju YS, Chandra N. Effect of NCB-02, atorvastatin and placebo on endothelial function, oxidative stress and inflammatory markers in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, 8-week study. Drugs R D. 2008;9(4):243-50.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
19.
Manfredini V, Biancini GB, Vanzin CS, Dal Vesco AM, Wayhs CA, Peralba Mdo C, et al. Apolipoprotein, C-reactive protein and oxidative stress parameters in dyslipidemic type 2 diabetic patients treated or not with simvastatin. Arch Med Res. 2010;41(2):104-09.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
20.
Villegas-Rivera G, Román-Pintos LM, Cardona-Muñoz EG, Arias-Carvajal O, Rodríguez-Carrizalez AD, Troyo-Sanromán R, et al. Effects of Ezetimibe/Simvastatin and Rosuvastatin on oxidative stress in diabetic neuropathy: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:756294.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
21.
Pereira EC, Bertolami MC, Faludi AA, Sevanian A, Abdalla DS. Antioxidant effect of simvastatin is not enhanced by its association with alpha-tocopherol in hypercholesterolemic patients. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37(9):1440-48.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
22.
Koksal M, Eren MA, Turan MN, Sabuncu T. The effects of atorvastatin and rosuvastatin on oxidative stress in diabetic patients. Eur J Intern Med. 2011;22(3):249-53.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
23.
Deng J, Wu G, Yang C, Li Y, Jing Q, Han Y. Rosuvastatin attenuates contrast-induced nephropathy through modulation of nitric oxide, inflammatory responses, oxidative stress and apoptosis in diabetic male rats. J Transl Med. 2015;13:53.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
24.
Istvan ES, Deisenhofer J. Structural mechanism for statin inhibition of HMG-CoA reductase. Science. 2001;292(5519):1160-64.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
25.
Feliciano-Alfonso JE. Rosuvastatin: Role in cardiovascular high-risk patient. Rev Fac Med. 2013;61(1):41-51.
26.
Vergès B, Florentin E, Baillot-Rudoni S, Petit JM, Brindisi MC, Pais de Barros JP, et al. Rosuvastatin 20 mg restores normal HDL-apoA-I kinetics in type 2 diabetes. J Lipid Res. 2009;50(6):1209-15.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
27.
Expert Panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults. Executive summary of the third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) expert panel on detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood cholesterol in adults (Adult Treatment Panel III). JAMA. 2001;285(19):2486-97.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
28.
Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972;18(6):499-502.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
29.
Sangeetha P, Das UN, Koratkar R, Suryaprabha P. Increase in free radical generation and lipid peroxidation following chemotherapy in patients with cancer. Free Radic Biol Med. 1990;8(1):15-19.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
30.
Levine RL, Garland D, Oliver CN, Amici A, Climent I, Lenz AG, et al. Determination of carbonyl content in oxidatively modified proteins. Methods Enzymol. 1990;186:464-78.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
31.
Pullaiah P, Suchitra MM, Siddhartha KB. Protein carbonyls and protein thiols in rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Res Med Sci. 2018;6:1738-41.   [CrossRef]
32.
Motchnik PA, Frei B, Ames BN. Measurement of antioxidants in human blood plasma. Methods Enzymol. 1994;234:269-79.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
33.
Bellia A, Rizza S, Galli A, Fabiano R, Donadel G, Lombardo MF, et al. Early vascular and metabolic effects of rosuvastatin compared with simvastatin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Atherosclerosis. 2010;210(1):199-201.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
34.
Shah SN, Arneja J. Efficacy of rosuvastatin in achieving target HDL, LDL, triglycerides and total cholesterol levels in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with newly diagnosed dyslipidaemia: An open label, nonrandomised, non-interventional and observational study in India. J Assoc Physicians India. 2013;61(10):721-26, 732.
35.
Shah C, Kumbla D, Moorthy A, Murthy S, Aneja P, Gotur J, et al. A post-marketing study evaluating the lipid-altering efficacy and safety of approved dose ranges of rosuvastatin in Indian hyperlipidemia patients in routine clinical practice (ROSUVEES). Journal of Indian College of Cardiology. 2015;5(4):282-90.   [CrossRef]
36.
Hodkinson A, Tsimpida D, Kontopantelis E, Rutter MK, Mamas MA, Panagioti M. Comparative effectiveness of statins on non-high density lipoprotein cholesterol in people with diabetes and at risk of cardiovascular disease: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ. 2022;376:e067731.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
37.
McFarlane SI, Muniyappa R, Francisco R, Sowers JR. Clinical review 145: Pleiotropic effects of statins: Lipid reduction and beyond. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(4):1451-58.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
38.
Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107(9):1058-70.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
39.
Tian XY, Wong WT, Xu A, Chen ZY, Lu Y, Liu LM, et al. Rosuvastatin improves endothelial function in db/db mice: Role of angiotensin II type 1 receptors and oxidative stress. Br J Pharmacol. 2011;164(2b):598-606.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
40.
Oettl K, Stauber RE. Physiological and pathological changes in the redox state of human serum albumin critically influence its binding properties. Br J Pharmacol. 2007;151(5):580-90.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
41.
Yet SF, Tian R, Layne MD, Wang ZY, Maemura K, Solovyeva M, et al. Cardiac-specific expression of heme oxygenase-1 protects against ischemia and reperfusion injury in transgenic mice. Circ Res. 2001;89(2):168-73.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
42.
Grosser N, Erdmann K, Hemmerle A, Berndt G, Hinkelmann U, Smith G, et al. Rosuvastatin upregulates the antioxidant defense protein heme oxygenase-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004;325(3):871-76.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
43.
Schupp N, Schmid U, Heidland A, Stopper H. Rosuvastatin protects against oxidative stress and DNA damage in vitro via upregulation of glutathione synthesis. Atherosclerosis. 2008;199(2):278-87.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/67904.19491

Date of Submission: Oct 18, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jan 14, 2024
Date of Acceptance: Apr 06, 2024
Date of Publishing: Jun 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 19, 2023
• Manual Googling: Jan 26, 2024
• iThenticate Software: Apr 04, 2024 (16%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 8
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com