Year :
2012
| Month :
February
| Volume :
6
| Issue :
1
| Page :
128 - 129
Full Version
Eagle- Barrett Syndrome:
A Case Report
Published: February 1, 2012 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2012/.1878
Chapay Soren, Paramananda Pujhari, P.V. Subbarao
1. Assistant Professor of Pediatrics,
2. Assistant professor of Pediatrics,
3. Professor & Head of Pediatrics,
Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences, Chaitanya Nagar
Amalapuram, East Godavari dist, Andhra Pradesh-533201,
India.
Correspondence Address :
DR. Chapay Soren MD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics
Konaseema Institute of Medical Sciences, Chaitanya Nagar
Amalapuram, East Godavari dist, Andhra Pradesh-533201, India.
Phone: 09440106344, E-mail: drcsoren55@yahoo.co.in
Abstract
Eagle-Barrett syndrome is a rare congenital anomaly of uncertain aetiology almost exclusive to males. It is characterized by the triad of absent or incomplete abdominal musculature, undescended testes, and urinary tract abnormalities. A male baby with above characteristics triad was born in our hospital. A diagnosis of Eagle-Barrett Syndrome was made. This was undertaken in order to highlight the occurrence of this rare syndrome in our environment and to review its pathogenesis, presentation and management approach.
Keywords
Urinary, Paediatrics, Renal Failure
Introduction
INTRODUCTION
Eagle-Barrett Syndrome, also known as triad syndrome or Prune belly syndrome, represents a spectrum of anomalies with variable degrees of severity predominantly affecting males. It is a rare condition characterized by the triad of absent or incomplete abdominal musculature, bilateral cryptorchidism and urinary tract abnormalities. It is caused by urethral obstruction early in development resulting in massive bladder distension and urinary ascites, leading to degeneration of the abdominal wall musculature and failure of testicular descent. The impaired elimination of urine from the bladder leads to oligohydramnios, pulmonary hypoplasia, and Potter’s facies. The urinary tract may have variable degrees of hydronephrosis, renal dysplasia, dilated tortuous ureters, an enlarged bladder, and a dilated prostatic urethra. The exact aetiology of EBS is unknown.The case is reported for its rare congenital abnormality.
Case Report
A 3.5kg male baby was delivered in our hospital by an un-booked 29- year old Gravida 2, Para 1, Live 1 mother with an APGAR score of 5 at 1minutes and 10 at 5 minutes after birth. Abdominal examination revealed huge distension with thin and wrinkled skin protruding most prominently in the right side with visible bowel loops.(Table/Fig 1) Both the kidneys are palpable. Perineal examination showed bilateral cryptorchidism and hypospadiasis. Cardiac examination was normal by clinical examination and echocardiography. Investigations showed hyponatremia with Na of 130meq/l, urea of 65mg/ dl, and creatinine of 1.5mg/dl. Ultrasound imaging showed mild hydronephrosis with gross dilatation pelvicalyceal system of right kidney and moderate hydronephrosis of left kidney with grossly dilated ureters, and distended bowel loops.
Discussion
Eagle-Barrett syndrome is a rare congenital disorder predominantly affecting males with male:female ratio being 2.0:1 (1). The incidence has been reported to be ranged 1 in 29,000 to 1 in 40,000 live births (2). Parker et al. first recognized the three components of this syndrome (3). The characteristic triad consists of absent or incomplete abdominal musculature, bilateral cryptorchidism and urinary tract abnormalities (4), (5). The exact aetiology is not known, however some of the studies reveal the possibility of genetic inheritance (6). Along with the classical triad broad spectrum of defects including musculoskeletal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal and genital malformations have been documented (7). When the urinary tract maldevelopment is associated with severe obstructive uropathy, this syndrome can lead to oligohydramnios and pulmonary hypoplasia. The pathogenesis of Eagle-Barrett syndrome is not clearly known. The mesodermal defect theory suggests that a defect exists in the mesoderm of the anterior abdominal wall and urinary tract. Between 6 and 10 weeks of gestation, aberrant development of the derivatives of the first lumbar myotome leads to a patchy muscular deficiency or hypoplasia of the abdominal wall as well as to urinary tract abnormalities (8), (9). An alternate theory, the urethral obstruction malformation complex, proposes that pressure atrophy of the abdominal wall muscles occurs when urethral obstruction leads to massive distension of the bladder and ureters. Bladder distension would also interfere with descent of the testes and thus be responsible for the bilateral cryptorchidism. This mechanism is responsible for the urinary tract dilatation and distension (10). The higher incidence of this syndrome in males has been explained on the basis of the more complex morphogenesis of the male urethra, possibly resulting in obstructive anomalies at several levels. Ultrasound, plain X-ray, and intravenous pyelogram are more useful investigations to diagnose the condition. Many neonates with Eagle-Barrett syndrome have difficulty with effective bladder emptying because the bladder musculature is poorly developed, and the urethra may be narrowed. When no obstruction is present, the goal of treatment is the prevention of urinary tract infection with antibiotic prophylaxis. When obstruction of the ureters or urethra is demonstrated, temporary drainage procedures, such as a vesicostomy, may help to preserve renal function until the child is old enough for surgery. Urinary tract infections occur often and should be treated promptly. Correction of the undescended testes by orchidopexy can be difficult in these children because the testes are located high in the abdomen and is best accomplished in the first 6months of life. Reconstruction of the abdominal wall (abdominoplasty) offers cosmetic and functional benefits. The prognosis ultimately depends on the degree of pulmonary hypoplasia and renal dysplasia. The most common complication is chronic renal failure that occurs in 25–30% of cases. Many infants are either stillborn or die within the first few weeks of life from severe lung or kidney problems, or a combination of congenital anomalies. There are cases of Eagle-Barrett syndrome who survived into adult life after abdominal reconstruction and urinary tract repair (11). There is no known prevention but the routine use of screening for fetal anomalies is helpful. If an antenatal diagnosis of urinary obstruction is made it may be possible to perform intra-uterine surgery to prevent the development of Eagle-Barrett syndrome (12). Early diagnosis of this syndrome and determining its optimal treatment are very important in helping to avoid its fatal course. These patients need multidisciplinary management of a neonatologist, nephrologists, and pediatric urologist for an optimal outcome.
Reference
| 1. | Rabinowitz R, Schillinger JF. Prune Prune belly syndrome in the female subject. J Urol 1977;115:454-56. | 2. | Greskovich FJ 3rd, Nyberg LM Jr. The prune belly syndrome: a review of its aetiology, defects, treatment and prognosis. J Urol 1988;140:707-12. | 3. | Parker RW. Case of an infant in whom some of the abdominal muscles were absent. Trans Clin Soc Lond 1895;28:201-03. | 4. | Manivel JC, Pettinato G, Reinberg Y, Gonzalez R, Burke B, Dehner LP, “Prune belly syndrome: clinicopathologic study of 29 cases,” Paediatric Pathology,1989;9(6):691-711. | 5. | Eagle JF, Barrett GS. Congenital deficiency of abdominal musculature with associated genitourinary abnormalities: A syndrome. Report of 9 cases. Paediatrics. Nov 1950;6(5):721-36. | 6. | Ramasamy R, Haviland M., Woodard JR., and Barone JG., “Patterns of inheritance in familial prune belly syndrome,” Urology.2005;65(6):1227. | 7. | Salihu HM, Tchuinguem G, Aliyu MH, and Kouam L, “Prune belly syndrome and associated malformations: a 13- year experience from a developing country,” West Indian Medical Journal.2003;52(4):281- 84. | 8. | Stephens FD, Gupta D. Pathogenesis of the prune belly syndrome. J Urol 1994;152:2328-31 | 9. | Greskovich F. J. and Nyberg L. M., “The prune belly syndrome: a review of itsaetiology, defects, treatment and prognosis,” Journal of Urology.1988;140(4):395-98. | 10. | Reinberg Y, Shapiro E, Manivel JC, Manley CB, Pettinato G, Gonzalez R, “Prune belly syndrome in females: a triad of abdominal musculature deficiency and anomalies of the urinary and genital systems,” Journal of Paediatrics.1991;118(3):395-98. | 11. | Woodhouse CRJ, “Prospects for fertility in patients born with genitourinary anomalies,” Journal of Urology.2001;165(6):2354-60. | 12. | Leeners B, Sauer I, Schefels J, Cotarelo CL, and Funk A, “Prunebelly syndrome: therapeutic options including in utero placement of a vesicoamniotic shunt,” Journal of Clinical Ultrasound. 2000;28(9):500- 07. |
ID: JCDR/2012/3823:1878
FINANCIAL OR OTHER COMPETING INTERESTS: NONE.
Date of Submission: Nov 30, 2011
Date of Peer Review: Dec 26, 2011
Date of Acceptance: Jan 15, 2012
Date of Publishing: Feb 15, 2012
|