JCDR - Register at Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 1043

Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri

"The Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) has been in operation since almost a decade. It has contributed a huge number of peer reviewed articles, across a spectrum of medical disciplines, to the medical literature.
Its wide based indexing and open access publications attracts many authors as well as readers
For authors, the manuscripts can be uploaded online through an easily navigable portal, on other hand, reviewers appreciate the systematic handling of all manuscripts. The way JCDR has emerged as an effective medium for publishing wide array of observations in Indian context, I wish the editorial team success in their endeavour"



Dr Bhanu K Bhakhri
Faculty, Pediatric Medicine
Super Speciality Paediatric Hospital and Post Graduate Teaching Institute, Noida
On Sep 2018




Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dematolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2023 | Month : May | Volume : 17 | Issue : 5 | Page : OC05 - OC08 Full Version

Early Post-stroke Seizures in Acute Ischaemic Stroke: A Retrospective Study

Published: May 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/63169.17821

Roy Thomas

1. Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Travancore Medical College Hospital, Kollam, Kerala, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Roy Thomas,
Associate Professor, Department of Neurology, Travancore Medical College Hospital, Kollam-691020, Kerala, India.
E-mail: drroythom@yahoo.com

Abstract

Introduction: Seizures represent an important complication of ischaemic stroke causing a substantial burden to post-stroke patients. Seizures occurring within one week after acute stroke onset are called early onset seizures. Several studies have tried to identify the risk factors for early seizures after stroke with controversial results.

Aim: To determine the risk factors for early post-stroke seizures in a retrospective cohort of acute ischaemic stroke.

Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included medical records of 552 adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke between March 2017 to September 2022 admitted to Travancore Medical College Hospital, Kollam, Kerala, India. The patients were divided into two groups: stroke patients with early onset seizures and stroke patients without early onset seizures. The following parameters were compared between the two groups: age, gender, presenting symptoms, ischaemic subtype (TOAST {Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment} classification), vascular territory involved, lesion location and lateralisation, infarct size, stroke severity based on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), vascular risk factors, treatment (thrombolysis, antiplatelets, anticoagulants use) and related complications (haemorrhagic transformation, infection, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, hyponatraemia). Univariate analysis was done using Chi-square test and multivariate analysis using logistic regression test. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27.0 statistical software was used, p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Among 552 patients, 76 (13.8%) were stroke patients with early onset seizure group and 476 (86.2%) were stroke patients without early onset seizure group. A total of 84.2% of patients developed seizure within 24 hours of stroke onset. A total of 409 (74.1%) patients were males. Patients with early onset seizures were younger. The most common seizure type was unknown onset to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (85.5%). Multivariate analysis identified severe NIHSS, supratentorial, cortical location, large artery disease, anticoagulation use, haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia as independent factors for early onset seizures.

Conclusion: Severe NIHSS at presentation, large artery disease, supra tentorial, cortical location of infarct, use of anticoagulants, haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia were significant risk factors for early seizures in acute ischaemic stroke. An early identification and understanding of these risk factors would help to prevent seizures in acute stroke patients.

Keywords

Cerebrovascular accident, Epilepsy, Hyponatraemia, Infarction

Introduction
Seizures in stroke patients cause significant morbidity and mortality. Seizures cause a significant hardship to post-stroke patients increasing duration of their hospital stay and disability (1). Literature has reported that 3.1-21.8% of stroke patients develop post-stroke seizures (2). Post-stroke seizures can be classified as early-onset and late-onset types. Seizures occurring within one week after acute stroke onset are called early onset seizures. Those occurring after one week of stroke onset are considered as late onset seizures (3). However, the incidence of post-stroke seizures is relatively consistent with two peaks: the first day and 6-12 months post-stroke (4). The aetiopathogenesis contemplated for early and late onset post-stroke seizures are different. The causes of early post-stroke seizures described are acute neuronal injury, glutamate induced excitotoxicity, disrupted blood brain barrier and defective function of ion channels. On the contrary, late post-stroke seizures occur due to gliotic scarring, changes in the properties of the neuronal membrane, neurodegeneration, persistent inflammation, altered synaptic plasticity and hyper-synchronisation of neuronal activities (5).

Several studies have researched on the predictive factors for early seizures after stroke with varying results. In recent meta-analysis by Ma S et al., cortical involvement, intracerebral haemorrhage, and cerebral infarction with haemorrhagic transformation were important predictors and risk factors for early seizures after stroke (6). In study by Lee SH et al., cortical involvement, functional deficits, increasing lesion size, younger age, and haemorrhage were common predictors for early post-stroke seizures (7).

Determining and analysing such predictors in stroke patients can help identify patients at risk for seizures. This can lead to timely care and management of seizures and improve preventive and therapeutic interventions. Prophylactic short-term antiepileptic medications for ischaemic strokes are still a matter of debate. This study aims to determine the risk factors for early post-stroke seizures in a retrospective cohort of acute ischaemic stroke.
Material and Methods
The present retrospective cohort study was conducted at Department of Neurology, Travancore Medical College Kollam, Kerala, India. A total of 552 adult patients with acute ischaemic stroke who were admitted in the Department of Neurology between March 2017 to September 2022 were included in the study. This study was approved by Institutional Research and Ethics committee review board (TMC-IEC-131/23). The data analysis was done in November 2022.

Inclusion criteria: Data of all adult patients who were diagnosed to have acute ischaemic stroke were included in the study.

Exclusion criteria: Patients with previously confirmed stroke and transient ischaemic attacks. Also, patients with primary haemorrhagic stroke, cerebral venous thrombosis, prior history of seizures or epilepsy, other potential epileptogenic co-morbidities like brain tumours, mass lesion, arteriovenous malformations, primary central nervous system vasculitis, or hydrocephalus, patients already on antiepileptic medications and those with less than seven days of in patient care were excluded from the study.

Acute stroke is brain cell death attributable to ischaemia based on pathological, imaging or other objective evidence of cerebral ischaemic injury in a defined vascular distribution (8). All patient records were reviewed and retrospectively analysed. Data regarding the following variables were collected and documented from the records. Age, gender, presenting symptoms, ischaemic subtype (TOAST classification) (9), vascular territory involved, lesion location and lateralisation, infarct size, stroke severity (NIHSS), vascular risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, coronary artery disease, smoking, atrial fibrillation, alcohol), treatment (thrombolysis, antiplatelets, anticoagulants use) and related complications (haemorrhagic transformation, infection, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, hyponatraemia). The patients were then divided into two groups-stroke patients with early onset seizures and stroke patients without early onset seizure. The various risk factors were compared between the two groups. The NIHSS was used to assess the stroke severity and classified into mild (≤3), moderate (4-10), and severe (>10) (10). Lesion location was classified as supra or infratentorial. When infarct was confined to cortical, subcortical or lobar regions, it was considered as supra tentorial. When infarct was confined to mid brain, pons, medulla or cerebellum it was considered as infra tentorial. The lesion size was determined by measuring the largest diameter of the lesion. Lesions were characterised as small (<1 cm), medium (1-3 cm) and large (>3 cm) lesion (3).

Statistical Analysis

Quantitative variables were expressed as mean±Standard Deviation (SD), whereas qualitative variables were expressed as frequencies and percentages. Comparison between groups (with and without seizures) was performed using chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as deemed appropriate. Significant risk factors that were designated as being associated with the seizure using the univariate analysis were entered in the multivariable regression analysis to identify predictors of early seizures. Measures of association were expressed as Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI). A p-value ≤0.05 was considered significant. Data were analysed using SPSS statistics (IBM corporation, Armonk, New York), version 27.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Results
Among 552 patients diagnosed with acute ischaemic stroke, 76 (13.8%) were in stroke patients with early onset seizure group and 476 (86.2%) were in stroke patients without early onset seizure group. A total of 409 (74.1%) were males and 143 (25.9%) were females. Patients with early seizures were younger. The mean age was 62.3±11.2 years. Unknown onset to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures was the most common seizure type (85.5%). One patient had status epilepticus. A total of 64 patients (84.2%) had seizures within 24 hours of stroke onset and three patients (3.9%) had seizures as the presenting symptom of stroke.

The baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in (Table/Fig 1). Risk factors for stroke were similarly distributed between the two groups. Hypertension was the most common risk factor for stroke in both the groups-83.8% in group without early seizure and 85.5% in group with early seizure.

Stroke patients with early onset seizure group had a more severe stroke at presentation (NIHSS >10), had a supratentorial, cortical location of the infarct and involved more commonly the MCA territory. Large artery disease was more common in patients with early seizures (Table/Fig 2). Haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia were the most common related complications (Table/Fig 3).

In univariate analysis, NIHSS>10, supratentorial, cortical location, large artery disease, large infarct size, anticoagulation use, haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia were associated with development of early post-stroke seizures. Logistic regression analysis was done to assess the independent predictors. In multivariate analysis, severe NIHSS, supratentorial, cortical location, large artery disease, anticoagulation use, haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia were significant risk factors for early onset seizures (Table/Fig 4). The strongest predictor for early seizure was haemorrhagic transformation (OR=45.61); followed by cortical location (OR=25.40) and hyponatraemia (OR=21.51).
Discussion
Stroke is a health problem of concern causing disability and death in adult population. Post-stroke seizures often result in a poor functional outcome and a higher morbidity (11). The studies conducted in various countries yielded different patterns of risk factors for post-stroke seizures. Early seizures occurred in 13.8% of patients with acute ischaemic stroke in this study. In the study by Agarwal A et al., early seizures were observed in 12.7% of patients (10). Another study that was conducted in India, reported a higher incidence rate of 17.9% (12). In the study by Shehta N et al., the incidence of early post-stroke seizures in Egypt was 9.3% (3). The majority of early seizures occurred within 24 hours of stroke onset. There were no differences in gender between the two groups. In this study, 85.5% of the seizure type was unknown onset to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures. Similar semiology was reported in Agarwal A et al., study in 94.6% (10). In the study by Stefanidou M et al., 72% of the seizure type was focal in onset compared to the generalised type; regardless of stroke type or time of seizure occurrence (4). These findings support the fact that the focal lesion following an infarction acts as the seizure focus.

The occurrence of early seizure significantly depends upon the location of the infarct. Cortical location and supratentorial location 7of the infarct was seen in 73.7% and 94.7% of early onset seizures in this study respectively, with cortical location predisposing to all. Galovic M et al., revealed that patients who have larger strokes involving the cortex, have acute symptomatic seizures and are at highest risk of developing post-stroke epilepsy (13). This was concurrent with the study by Shehta N et al., (3). Cortical irritation can increase the excitability and lead to seizure onset. Early onset seizures were associated with large artery disease stroke subtype (47.3%). This was 43.2% in Agarwal A et al., study (10). Large artery disease will indeed lead to larger size infarct volumes, thus involving larger cortical brain tissue. This could increase the probability of post-stroke seizures.

Patients with early seizures had a significantly higher NIHSS score (NIH stroke scale) at admission than those without. A 40.8% had a severe NIHSS at onset. Similar corroboration was seen in the study by Agarwal A et al., where stroke severity was based on the NIHSS and modified Rankin scale (10). The stroke risk factors were nearly equally distributed between the early seizure group and group without early seizure. However, hypertension was present in significantly less frequency in those with early seizure in Agarwal A et al., study and Hundozi Z et al., study (10),(14). The use of anticoagulants was found to be associated with an increased risk of early seizures. It was seen in 23.7% of patients. Studies have showed that thrombin was a key factor for seizure by predisposing to maladaptive plasticity (15). Haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia were significant risk factors for early onset seizures in this study. In study by Castro-Apolo R et al., presence of haemorrhage in infarct was the primary risk factor for seizure occurrence (16). Haemorrhage often acts as an irritative focus, thus predisposing to seizures. However, in the study by Agarwal A et al., hyponatraemia was not a predictive factor for early onset seizures (10).

In this study, multivariable regression analysis showed that severe NIHSS at presentation, large artery disease, supra tentorial and cortical location of infarct, use of anticoagulants, haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia showed a positive association with development of early post-stroke seizures. These factors would help to determine those who are at high-risk of developing early seizure. Managing acute ischaemic stroke patients and these risk factors with prophylactic antiepileptic medications needs to be considered in the stroke management protocol. This would indeed reduce the morbidity, mortality and in hospital stay for such stroke patients.

Limitation(s)

The greatest limitation of the present study was the retrospective design and conclusions were based on observation from a single study centre. Also, the sample size was relatively low. Thus, a prospective multicentre study is required to further evaluate the risk factors.
Conclusion
Severe NIHSS at presentation, large artery disease, supra tentorial, cortical location of infarct, use of anticoagulants, haemorrhagic transformation and hyponatraemia were significant risk factors for early seizures in acute ischaemic stroke patients. Early identification of these factors and improved knowledge about them will help in better care and prevention of seizures in acute stroke patients.
Reference
1.
Wang JZ, Vyas MV, Saposnik G, Burneo JG. Incidence and management of seizures after ischemic stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2017;89(12):1220-28.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
2.
Bentes C, Martins H, Peralta Ana R, Casimiro C, Morgado C, Franco A, et al. Post-stroke seizures are clinically underestimated. J Neurol. 2017;264(9):1978-85.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
3.
Shehta N, Fahmi RM, Ramadan BM, Emad EM, Elsaid AF. Early post-stroke seizures in a sample of Egyptian patients with first-ever stroke. Neurol India. 2018;66(4):1031-35.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
4.
Stefanidou M, Das RR, Beiser AS, Sundar B, Kelly-Hayes M, Kase CS, et al. Incidence of seizures following initial ischemic stroke in a community-based cohort: The Framingham Heart Study. Seizure. 2017;47:105-10.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
5.
Reddy DS, Bhimani A, Kuruba R, Park MJ, Sohrabji F. Prospects of modelling poststroke epileptogenesis. J Neurosci Res. 2017;95:1000 16.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
6.
Ma S, Fan X, Zhao X, Wang K, Wang H, Yang Y. Risk factors for early-onset seizures after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 18 observational studies. Brain Behav. 2021;11(6):e02142.   [CrossRef]
7.
Lee SH, Aw KL, Banik S, Myint PK. Post-stroke seizure risk prediction models: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Epileptic Disord. 2022;24(2):302-14.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
8.
Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, Caplan LR, Connors JJ, Culebras A, et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease; Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2064-89.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
9.
Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke. 1993;24(1):35-41. Doi: 10.1161/01.str.24.1.35. PMID: 7678184.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
10.
Agarwal A, Sharma J, Padma Srivastava MV, Bhatia R, Singh MB, Gupta A, et al. Early post-stroke seizures in acute ischemic stroke: A prospective cohort study. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2021;24(4):580-85.
11.
Koubeissi M. Seizures worsen stroke outcome: New evidence from a large sample. Epilepsy Curr. 2015;15(1):30-31.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
12.
Goswami RP, Karmakar PS, Ghosh A. Early seizures in first ever acute stroke patients in India: Incidence, predictive factors and impact on early outcome. Eur J Neurol. 2012;19:1361 66.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
13.
Galovic M, Ferreira-Atuesta C, Abraira L, Döhler N, Sinka L, Brigo F, et al. Seizures and epilepsy after stroke: Epidemiology, biomarkers and management. Drugs Aging. 2021;38(4):285-99.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
14.
Hundozi Z, Shala A, Boshnjaku D, Bytyqi S, Rrustemi J, Rama M, et al. Hypertension on admission is associated with a lower risk of early seizures after stroke. Seizure. 2016;36:40 43.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
15.
Altman K, Shavit-Stein E, Maggio N. Post-stroke seizures and epilepsy: From proteases to maladaptive plasticity. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:397.   [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
16.
Castro-Apolo R, Huang JF, Vinan-Vega M, Tatum WO. Outcome and predictive factors in post-stroke seizures: A retrospective case-control study. Seizure. 2018;62:11-16.  [CrossRef]  [PubMed]
DOI and Others
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/63169.17821

Date of Submission: Jan 30, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Mar 18, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Apr 05, 2023
Date of Publishing: May 01, 2023

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 06, 2023
• Manual Googling: Feb 20, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Mar 22, 2023 (20%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com