Year :
2023
| Month :
January
| Volume :
17
| Issue :
1
| Page :
EC05 - EC09
Full Version
Histopathological Spectrum of Spinal Tumours at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Gujarat, India: A Retrospective Study
Published: January 1, 2023 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2023/59217.17277
Khushbu Kantilal Tilva, Urvi Parikh
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, P. D. U. Medical College and Hospital, Rajkot, Gujarat, India.
2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, B. J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Khushbu Kantilal Tilva,
Block No. 1103, Gol Coin Apartment, Behind Speedwell Party Plot, Near Sanidhya 254, Rajkot-360004, Gujarat, India.
E-mail: tilvakhushbu@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: The anatomic structures in the spinal area are diverse and unpredictable, often representing an excellent test for both the neuroclinicians and neuropathologists, thereby showing a broad heterogeneous spectrum of pathological lesions. Clinical history, radiological features, and pathological examination are required to diagnose spinal tumours.
Aim: To study the histopathological spectrum of spinal tumours in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Gujarat, India.
Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, data was collected from the records of 100 patients who had spinal tumours and who attended the Department of Pathology. Histopathological diagnosis of the spinal biopsy specimen was the primary outcome variable. Age, gender, location of the tumour, and clinical features were other study relevant variables. The status of the spinal tumour (benign/malignant) was considered an explanatory variable. Descriptive analysis was carried out by mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, frequency, and proportion for categorical variables. Categorical outcomes were compared using the Chi-square test.
Results: A total of 100 subjects were included, among which 42 participants were males, and 58 were females with the mean age 34.62±17.64 years. The maximum number of spinal tumours were noted in (21-30 year) 3rd decade (29%) of life. Benign spinal tumours (73%) were more common than malignant spinal tumours (27%). Schwannoma was the most common (37%) spinal tumour, followed by meningioma (20%), and ependymoma (14%). The distribution of spinal tumours based on anatomical location, 31% intradural intramedullary, 49% intradural extramedullary, and 20% extradural tumours. There was a significant difference between nerve sheath tumours and meningioma with gender (p-value <0.001).
Conclusion: The study identified schwannoma and meningiomas as the most common tumours. The thoracic region was the most frequently involved spinal level, followed by the cervical, and the most affected location was the intradural extramedullary.
Keywords
Meningioma, Schwannoma, Spinal cord neoplasms
Introduction
The anatomic structures in the spinal area are diverse and unpredictable, often representing an excellent test for both the neuroclinicians and neuropathologists, thereby showing a broad heterogeneous spectrum of pathological lesions. Spinal lesions are rare and usually relate to epidural space’s spinal tissues, which involve the spinal meninges, spinal nerve roots, and spinal cord. It commonly affects the thoracic region, although it can involve any spinal level (1),(2). Spinal cord tumours comprise 4-16% of all the Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours (2). Spinal lesions can be grouped into congenital malformations, degenerative diseases, inflammatory disorders, cystic lesions, vascular malformations, and neoplasms (1). Spinal tumour can be divided into two major groups: the first one is primary tumours which originate from the spinal cord, meningeal, or bone cells. The second group is metastatic lesions that invade the spinal cord and surrounding tissues and originate from other cells (3),(4). Based on anatomical location, the spinal Space Occupying Lesions (SOLs) are extradural and intradural lesions. Extradural lesions occur outside the spinal dura and emerge from the bony spine, intervertebral discs, and adjacent soft tissues. Intradural lesions arise within the dura. Intradural spinal tumours are further classified as extramedullary and intramedullary (5),(6).
Intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumours account for about 60% of the intraspinal tumours and include schwannomas (30%; incidence rate, 0.3-0.4 cases annually per 100,000 people), meningiomas (25%; incidence rate, 0.32 cases annually per 100,000 people), neurofibromas, teratomas, lipomas, and metastatic tumours (7),(8),(9),(10). Intramedullary lesions are situated in the substance of the spinal cord. Spinal cord gliomas represent roughly 80% of intradural intramedullary tumours, with astrocytic or ependymal tumours contributing the central part and the rest including hemangioblastoma (3-8%), ganglioglioma, lymphoma, and melanoma (rare) (11),(12).
Tumours of the spinal cord are more common in the pediatric population than in adults (13). The symptoms usually seen in patients with primary spinal tumours are pain along the spinal axis, neck or back pain, radiating pain, sensory disturbance, gait disturbance, sexual dysfunction, paraesthesia, and paraplegia (14). Albeit their rarity, spinal tumours are a significant reason for morbidity and mortality (15). Clinical history, radiological features, and pathological examination are required to diagnose spinal tumours (3). Medications, surgery, radiation, or a combination of these treatments are employed to manage these tumours (16). The study aimed to evaluate the spectrum of spinal tumours that presented to tertiary care teaching hospital in Gujarat, India.
Material and Methods
In this retrospective study, data was collected from the record available in the Department of Pathology at a tertiary care teaching hospital, Gujarat, India. The study specimen of spinal tumours were collected from the patients who attended the Pathology Department from June 2016 to September 2018 and the analysis of the collected data was carried out in October 2018. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of B. J. Medical College and Civil Hospital with reference number 439/2016. Data confidentiality was maintained, and informed consent was taken from the patient while collecting the sample that the specimens might be used for study purposes in the future.
Sample size calculation: The sample size calculated assuming the proportion of any CNS tumours was 6.49% (17). The other parameters considered for sample size calculation were 5% absolute precision and 95% confidence level. Based on the previous hospital records, the approximate number of cases attending the study setting during the one year was 100,000. Hence a finite population correction was applied for 100,000. As per the formula for sample size calculation (18), the required number of subjects was 94. To account for a non participation rate of about 6% (6 subjects), it was decided to sample about 100 subjects in the study. All the eligible specimens of the patients were included by convenient sampling till the sample size was obtained.
Inclusion criteria: All the study specimen, belonging to patients of any age and both gender, diagnosed with spinal tumours at the Department of Pathology, during study period were included in the study.
Exclusion criteria: Primary vertebral tumours and paraspinal soft tissue lesions were excluded. Non neoplastic conditions of the CNS were excluded.
Procedure
Relevant clinical data, including age, gender, and clinical symptoms, were noted. The protocol followed for a histopathological examination in our Department of Pathology for specimens was as follows- After receiving, all surgically resected specimens were fixed in the 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 hrs. Bony parts were decalcified in Nitric acid (HNO3). After detailed gross examination, various tissue representative areas were taken from the received surgical specimen and submitted to routine tissue processing and paraffin embedding. Sections of 5 μ thickness were cut, and stained with Haemotoxylin and Eosin (H&E), slides were examined under a light microscope, and the diagnosis was made. Recent World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of central nervous system tumours was used for the variety and grading of the tumours (19).
Statistical Analysis
Descriptive analysis was carried out by mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables, frequency, and proportion for categorical variables. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. R studio and coGuide version V.1.0.3 was used for statistical analysis (20).
Results
A total of 100 subjects were included in the final analysis. The mean age was 34.62±17.64 years, 42 participants were male, and the remaining 58 were female. The maximum number of spinal tumours were noted in the 3rd decade (21-30 year, 29%) of life (Table/Fig 1). Benign spinal tumours (73%) were more common than malignant spinal tumours (27%). Muscle weakness (39%) was the most common clinical feature, followed by pain (18%), and swelling (13%). Spinal tumour was more common in the thoracic region (49%), followed by cervical region (23%) (Table/Fig 2).
Schwannoma was the most common (37%) spinal tumour, followed by meningioma (20%). Out of 10 people with glioma, all of them had a malignant tumour. Out of 20 people with meningioma, all of them had a benign tumour. Out of 14 people with ependymoma, 2 (20%) had a benign tumour, and 12 (80%) had malignant tumour (Table/Fig 3).
Among the people with a benign tumour, most participants (64.38%) had intradural extramedullary location affected. In people with a malignant tumour, the majority (66.67%) of participants had intradural intramedullary tumour (Table/Fig 4).
Among the male participants, 25 (60.98%) participants had nerve sheath tumours, 2 (10%) participants had meningioma, 8 (57.14%) participants had ependymoma, and 5 (62.5%) participants had astrocytoma. The difference in the proportion of gender between the nerve sheath tumours was statistically significant (p-value=0.001). The difference in gender between the meningioma is found to be significant with a p-value of 0.001, with the majority of 18 (90%) female participants (Table/Fig 5).
Histopathological findings: When Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) slides of the patients were observed in case of schwanomma, it was found highly cellular, spindle cell arrange in palisading manner and tumors cells separated by abundant edematous fluid. (Table/Fig 6). In case of ancient schwannoma, scattered atypical to bizzare appearing nuclei was observed (Table/Fig 7). In cases of neurofibroma, characterstically markedly elongated nuclei with wavy, serpentine confuration and pointed end (Table/Fig 8). Astrocytoma cases depict mild nuclear atypia of tumor cells and dense fibrillary background (Table/Fig 9). Oligodendroglioma cases showed “egg fried appearance” (Table/Fig 10). The glioblastoma cases under microscope depicted dense cellularity, marked pleomorphism and tumor cells palisading around necrosis (Table/Fig 11).
The cases of meningioma showed whorls pattern and psammoma body (Table/Fig 12). Myxopapillary ependymoma cases showed epithelial tumor cells arranged around fibrovascular cores (Table/Fig 13). In case of cavernous angioma, large vessels with cystically dilated lumina and thin walls were observed (Table/Fig 14). For the diagnosis of lipoma cases, the H&E slides gave the appearance of mature adipose tissue as in (Table/Fig 15).
Discussion
Diversity of anatomic structures in the spinal region make the histopathology report more clinically valuable (21). In this study, various spinal tumours were evaluated for age, gender, incidence, anatomical location, clinical feature and its pathological profile.
The maximum number of spinal tumours (both benign and malignant) were noted in 3rd decade (29%) of life in this study while according to Hirako K et al., benign spinal tumour more common in 50-59 years and malignant spinal tumour more common in 40-49 years (3).
Most of previous studies showed male predominance (3),(16),(22),(23),(24),(25),(26) while the present study showed female predominance (58%) which was comparable with Drashti P et al. and Santos Júnior EC et el., (27),(28).
The most common presenting symptom was muscle weakness in the present study which was comparable with Drashti P et al., (27),(28) and Murad et al., (29) while in some studies, the pain was the most frequent symptom (16),(22),(25),(28). At vertebral level, the thoracic region was the most frequently involved followed by cervical and lumbar in this study which was comparable with other studies (16),(22),(27),(28). Intradural extramedullary location (49%) was affected more and a similar pattern is seen in other studies (3),(16),(22),(27),(29) while in Santos J. et al., (28) intradural intramedullary location was most common site. Benign tumours (73%) were more common than malignant (27%) tumours which was comparable with other studies (Table/Fig 16) (3),(16),(22),(27),(28),(29).
Schwannoma was the most common (37%) spinal tumour in the present study which was comparable with other studies (3),(16),(22),(28) where (27),(29) meningioma was more common.
Limitation(s)
Small sample size was the limitation of the study which hampers the generalisability of the results.
Conclusion
Tissue diagnosis is imperative due to the broad spectrum of pathological lesions in this area with differing prognosis and therapeutic protocols. The tumour’s location was essential to understanding the nature and course of the disease in these tumours. Schwannoma and meningiomas were the most common tumours identified in the present study. The thoracic region was the most frequently involved at spinal level, followed by the cervical, and the most affected location was the intradural extramedullary.
Reference
| 1. | Pant I, Chaturvedi S. Spectrum of histopathology in spinal lesions. Astrocyte. 2016;2(4):187-99.
[ CrossRef] | 2. | Sisodia SM, Binayke RS, Joshi TC. The histopathological spectrum of spinal nerve root lesions. Int J Res Rev. 2018;5(5):18-21.
| 3. | Hirano K, Imagama S, Sato K, Kato F, Yukawa Y, Yoshihara H, et al. Primary spinal cord tumors: Review of 678 surgically treated patients in Japan. A multicenter study. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(10):2019-26.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 4. | Chikani MC, Okwunodulu O, Mesi M, Mezue WC, Ohaegbulam SC, Ndubuisi CC. Surgically treated primary spinal cord neoplasms in Southeastern Nigeria. J Neurosci Rural Pract. 2018;9(1):137-39.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | Abdallah A, Ozer AF. Taking history and patient assessment in spinal surgery. Princ Spine Surg. 2019:99-108.
| 6. | Grimm S, Chamberlain MC. Adult primary spinal cord tumors. Expert Rev Neurother. 2009;9(10):1487-95.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Parate DS. Histopathological spectrum of spinal space occupying lesions. J Med Sci Clin Res. 2019;7(1):1140-45.
[ CrossRef] | 8. | Abul-Kasim K, Thurnher MM, McKeever P, Sundgren PC. Intradural spinal tumors: Current classification and MRI features. Neuroradiology. 2008;50(4):301-14.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Duong LM, McCarthy BJ, McLendon RE, Dolecek TA, Kruchko C, Douglas LL, et al. Descriptive epidemiology of malignant and nonmalignant primary spinal cord, spinal meninges, and cauda equina tumors, United States, 2004-2007. Cancer. 2012;118(17):4220-27.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Seppala MT, Haltia MJJ, Sankila RJ, Jaaskelainen JE, Heiskanen O. Long-term outcome after removal of spinal schwannoma: A clinicopathological study of 187 cases. J Neurosurg. 1995;83(4):621-26.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Parsa AT, Chi JH, Acosta FL, Ames CP, McCormick PC. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: Molecular insights and surgical innovation. Clin Neurosurg. 2005;52:76-84.
| 12. | Lonser RR, Weil RJ, Wanebo JE, DeVroom HL, Oldfield EH. Surgical management of spinal cord hemangioblastomas in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(1):106-16.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Ogunlade J, Wiginton JG, Elia C, Odell T, Rao SC. Primary spinal astrocytomas: A literature review. Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5247.
[ CrossRef] | 14. | Yolcu Y, Wahood W, Kerezoudis P, Alvi MA, Habermann EB, Bydon M. Primary central nervous system tumors: Comparing two National cancer registries. World Neurosurg. 2019;128:e719-e731.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Samartzis D, Gillis CC, Shih P, O’Toole JE, Fessler RG. Intramedullary spinal cord tumors: Part I-Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Glob Spine J. 2015;5(5):425-35.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | Jobunputra GP, Parikh UR, Goswami HM. Histopathological study of spinal tumors. Int J Cur Res Rev. 2016;8(14):01-08.
| 17. | Johannesen TB, Angell-Andersen E, Tretli S, Langmark F, Lote K. Trends in incidence of brain and central nervous system tumors in Norway, 1970-1999. Neuroepidemiology. 2004;23(3):101-09.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Daniel W. Determination of sample size for estimating proportions. In biostatistics: A foundation for analysis in health. Stat Med. 2001;20:322-28.
| 19. | Cheng MK. Spinal cord tumors in the People’s Republic of China: A statistical review. Neurosurgery. 1982;10(1):22-24.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | BDSS Corp. Released 2020. coGuide Statistics software, Version 1.0, India: BDSS corp. Available from: https://www.coguide.in. [Last accessed on 2021 12 Jun 29].
| 21. | Suh YL, Koo H, Kim TS, Chi JG, Park SH, Khang SK, et al. Tumors of the central nervous system in Korea: A multicenter study of 3221 cases. J Neurooncol. 2002;56(3):251-59.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Moein P, Behnamfar O, Khalighinejad N, Farajzadegan Z, Fard SA, Razavi M, et al. A 12-year epidemiologic study on primary spinal cord tumors in Isfahan, Iran. J Res Med Sci. 2013;18(1):17-21.
| 23. | Preston-Martin S. Descriptive epidemiology of primary tumors of the spinal cord and spinal meninges in Los Angeles County, 1972-1985. Neuroepidemiology. 1990;9(2):106-11.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 24. | Huang W, Zheng S, Tian Q, Huang J, Li Y, Xu Q, et al. Statistical analysis of central nervous system tumors in China. J Neurosurg. 1982;56:555-64.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 25. | Singh PR, Pandey TK, Ahmad F, Chhabra DK. A prospective observational study of clinical outcome of operated patients of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor in our tertiary care center. Rom Neur. Published online. 2018;32(4):632-40.
| 26. | Govada N, Chowdary KR, Jeshtadi A, Gollapalli S, Dara K. Spinal nerve sheath tumors: Analysis of 20 cases with review of literature. Int J Res Heal Sci. 2014;2(1):140-45.
| 27. | Drashti P, Smita S, Hansa G. Histopathological study of primary spinal cord tumors. International Journal of Clinical and Doagnostic Pathology. 2021;4(2):35-38.
[ CrossRef] | 28. | Santos Júnior EC, Dantas F, Caries ACV, Cariri GA, Reis MTD, Botelho RV, et al. Evaluation of surgically treated primary spinal cord tumors in a single Brazilian institution: A case series study of 104 patients. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23408.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 29. | Murad A, Anas A, Erhan OS. Radiologic-Histopathologic correlation of adult spinal tumors: A retsospective study. Asian J Neurosurg. 2020;15(2):354-62. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2023/59217.17277
Date of Submission: Jul 23, 2022
Date of Peer Review: Aug 29, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Oct 07, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jan 01, 2023
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jul 27, 2022
• Manual Googling: Oct 01, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Oct 06, 2022 (11%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|