Year :
2022
| Month :
July
| Volume :
16
| Issue :
7
| Page :
PC18 - PC21
Full Version
Epidemiological and Histopathological Study of Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/51677.16637
Amit Kumar, Khalid Mahmood, Rohit Upadhyay, Vijoy Kumar
1. Consultant, Department of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
2. Consultant, Department of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
3. Consultant, Department of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
4. Consultant, Department of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Amit Kumar,
Indira Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.
E-mail: amitkumaratpmch@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: The incidence of Renal Cell Carcinomas (RCCs) has increased steadily and they have become the seventh most common histological type of cancer across the globe.
Aim: To assess the profile of the patients of RCC with respect to age distribution, sex distribution, clinical presentation, site of tumour, risk factors, staging, histopathological examination, and operative complications.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted in Department of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India, from January 2019 to June 2020, that included patients with RCC. The pathology specimens and reports of patients with RCC who underwent laparoscopic, open, cytoreductive, and partial nephrectomy were reviewed. Data related to demographic characteristics, site of tumour, risk factors, co-morbidities, clinical features, histopathology, tumour grade and stage, type of surgery, intra-and postoperative complications, and Fuhrman nuclear grading system were recorded.
Results: Total 60 patients diagnosed with RCC were included in this study. Of these, majority of patients were men (n=44). Majority of patients belonged to the age group of ≤60 years (n=39). Smoking (n=30), hypertension (n=30), obesity (n=20), and occupational exposure (n=8) were major risk factors associated with RCC. Haematuria (n=36), flank pain (n=24), hematuria and lump, with flank pain (n=18), and weight loss (n=18) were the most common clinical features in patients with RCC. According to the histopathologic type, 30 (50.0%) patients had clear cell RCC, 18 (30.0%) had papillary RCC, 8 (13.3%) had chromophobe RCC and the other four (6.7%) had cystic neoplasm, urothelial, angiomyolipoma, or sarcomatoid. Twenty-four patients underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy while 31 patients underwent open nephrectomy. Cytoreductive and partial nephrectomy was performed in three and two patients, respectively.
Conclusion: The present study findings suggest that age has an impact on development of RCC. Also, intraoperative and postoperative complications were more common among patients who underwent open nephrectomy.
Keywords
Clear cell carcinoma, Haematuria, Laparoscopic nephrectomy, Smoking
Introduction
Renal Cell Carcinoma is a malignancy originating from the proximal renal tubular epithelium. The RCCs are the seventh most common histological type of cancer across the globe (1). In India RCC is a serious public health problem and the prevalence is about 2/100,000 in men population and among women it’s about 1/100,000 population (2).
There are several risk factors linked to RCC. Smoking is an independent risk factor for developing RCC (3). Globally, obesity has been estimated to account for over 18% of RCC cases (4). There is evidence that both obesity and hypertension (HTN) are frequently present in the same patient population. Further HTN is also an independent risk factor for the development of RCC.
The most frequent histological types of RCCs include clear cell RCC, papillary RCC, and chromophobe RCC (1). Clear cell carcinoma is observed at a frequency of 75% of all RCCs. It mainly arises from the epithelium of the proximal tubule. Papillary RCC accounts for approximately 15% of all RCCs and it mainly arises from the epithelium of the proximal tubule. While chromophobe RCCs have been observed at a frequency of ~5% of kidney tumours. It is thought to arise from the distal nephron and epithelium of the collecting tubule (5),(6).
Most of the epidemiological studies of RCC were done in western countries (3),(7),(8). Only a few studies from India reported the study on incidence, survival, risk factors, complications, and stages of RCC (9),(10),(11). Such evidence-based studies among the Indian populations were found to be scarce. The present study was conducted to assess the profile of the patients of RCC with respect to age distribution, sex distribution, clinical presentation, site of tumour, risk factors, staging, histopathological examination, and operative complications.
Material and Methods
A retrospective descriptive study was conducted among patients with RCC recruited at Department of Urology, Indira Gandhi Institute of Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India from January 2019 to June 2020. The pathology specimens and reports of patients with RCC who underwent laparoscopic, open, cytoreductive, and partial nephrectomy were reviewed. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee (EC approval number: 840/IEC/IGIMS/2019). Each study participant provided written informed consent before participating in the study.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria: Patients of either sex, aged 20 years or older, and homogenous renal masses measuring >15 HU were included. Patients with lipid-rich angiomyolipoma, aged <20 years, enhancement <15 HU, life threatening co-morbid conditions, and non-enhancing renal mass were excluded.
Data collection
Clinical diagnosis was made by Contrast-Enhanced CT (CECT) scans after diagnosis of a renal space occupying lesion. Data related to demographic characteristics (sex, age, and religion), site of tumour, risk factors, co-morbidities, clinical features, histopathology, tumour grade and stage, type of surgery, intra-and postoperative complications were collected during routine care. Fuhrman grade, histopathological subtypes, and lymph node involvement were analysed. Fuhrman nuclear grade is the most widely used grading system for RCC. Fuhrman nuclear grading system is a 4-tiered grading system determined by the nucleus shape, size, and nucleolar prominence (Table/Fig 1) (12). Staging of RCC was done using the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumour, Node and Metastases (TNM) system (13). The TNM staging system are shown in (Table/Fig 2).
The primary endpoint was to determine the profile of the patients of RCC in respect to age distribution, sex distribution, clinical presentation, site of tumour, risk factors, staging, histopathological examination, and intra-and postoperative complications. In the present study, the post-operative complications were compared between the groups with the Clavien-Dindo classification. The Clavien-Dindo classification is a standardised system for assessing postoperative complications. It was developed by Clavien in 1992 based on the severity of a complication. Grade 1included minor risk events requiring minimal or no intervention. Grade 2 complications consists of potentially life-threatening complications requiring therapeutic intervention or a hospital stay. Grade 2a included complications requiring therapeutic intervention and grade 2b included complications requiring an invasive procedure. Grade 3 consists of complications leading to lasting disability or organ resection. Grade 4 complication indicated death of a patient due to a complication (14).
Statistical Analysis
Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, Illinois, USA). Continuous variables were summarized with descriptive statistics, including mean and Standard Deviation (SD) and categorical variables were presented as frequency and percentages. A comparison of quantitative variables between the groups was done using the chi-square test. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
A total of 60 patients vising the institute were diagnosed with RCC of which 44 patients were men and 16 patients were women. The major attributable risk factors include smoking (n=30), obesity (n=20), and occupational exposure (n=8). The most prevalent comorbidities in these patients were HTN (50.0%) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (41.7%).
The most common histopathologic type of RCC was clear cell carcinoma (50.0%), followed by papillary (30.0%), chromophobe carcinoma (13.3%), and the other four (6.7%) had cystic neoplasm, urothelial, angiomyolipoma, and sarcomatoid. Twenty four patients (40.0%) underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy while 31 patients (51.7%) underwent open nephrectomy. Cytoreductive and partial nephrectomy was performed in three (5.0%) and two (3.3%) patients, respectively (Table/Fig 3).
Intraoperative haemorrhage (n=5), Gerota’s fascia (n=3), pulmonary metastasis (n=2), hepatic metastasis (n=1), unresectable tumour (n=1) was observed in patients who underwent open nephrectomy. Postoperative flank haematoma (n=1), wound infection (n=1), ileus (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), and anaemia (n=1) was observed in patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy (Table/Fig 4). The association of RCC with age and sex is depicted in (Table/Fig 5).
Discussion
The present study evaluated the epidemiological and histopathological pattern of RCC and risk factors associated with RCC. The key findings were; a) majority of the population were men presenting age group of ≤60 years; b) Smoking, obesity, and occupational exposure were common risk factors associated with RCC; c) The most prevalent comorbidities in these patients were HTN and benign prostatic hyperplasia; d) haematuria, flank pain, lump, and weight loss were the most common clinical features of patients with RCC; e) clear cell carcinoma was the most common histopathologic type of RCC followed by papillary and chromophobe carcinoma; f) intra- and postoperative complications were common among patients who underwent open nephrectomy than laparoscopic nephrectomy.
A recent noteworthy study by Qu Y et al., noted that RCC incidence was majorly driven by men than women (69.9 vs. 37.1%) (15). This finding was in general agreement with previous worldwide and Indian reports showing that the incidence of RCC was more often in men than women (16),(17). The previous study by Abraham G et al conducted in Northern India reported the prevalence of RCC and it was found to be higher in men than women (2). Another evidence-based retrospective study reported the higher prevalence of RCC in men than women with a men to women ratio of 2.7:1 (10). These results were in line with the present study which showed higher incidence of RCC in men, with a men-to-women ratio of 2.8:1. These observations suggest that sex was an independent predictor of the incidence of RCC.
A previous histopathological study from Northern India, revealed that the majority of RCC cases at presentation were between 39 and 59 years of age (~60%) and nearly 40% of patients presented at <60 years of age (11). Another noteworthy study in Indian literature that had a relatively small sample size (n=142) also showed RCC was predominant in young patients aged <60 years (10). Similarly, the present study noted the remarkable prevalence of RCC in young individuals aged ≤60 years (65.0%) as compared to older individuals aged >60 years (35.0%). Evidence from a study that included the adult Indian population demonstrated corroborating observations thereby suggesting RCC is relatively frequent among young individuals aged <60 years (18). Moreover, a decreasing trend in the prevalence of RCC was observed with increasing age groups suggesting an inverse relationship between age and incidence of RCC. In contrast to above-aforementioned studies, a recently published population based analysis involving a larger population (n=114,539) noted the higher prevalence of RCC in older patients (58-90 years; 64.9%) as compared to the young adult population (18-57 years; 35.1%) (15).
Several risk factors have been studied. Cigarette smoking, obesity, and Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) were the major risk factor responsible for increased risk of renal cell carcinoma (19). Smoking was the most common lifestyle related risk factor seen among this study population. The majority of patients had HTN followed by obesity and occupational exposure. These findings are in concordance with Ray RP et al. wherein smoking, HTN, obesity, and occupational exposure were the factors shown to be strongly associated with RCC (20). A previous retrospective study by Tsivian M et al., depicted that smoking was consistently associated with advanced RCC. Interestingly, current and former smokers had increased odds of advanced RCC by 1.5- and 1.6-fold, respectively (21). The association between obesity and RCC has been documented in many studies (22),(23),(24) however the exact mechanism between obesity and RCC is still not understood. Hypertension or its treatment has been linked to the occurrence of RCC (25). Overall evidence reveals that passive smoking, HTN, obesity, and occupational exposure leads to increased risk for the development of RCC.
In the present study haematuria (60.0%), flank pain (40.0%), and flank pain (30.0%), and weight loss (30.0%) were the most clinical features of RCC. The previous study conducted at Eastern India reported haematuria (53.3%) and flank pain (50.7%) as the most common presenting symptoms in patients with RCC (20). Another evidence based retrospective study reported haematuria as the most common presenting symptom in 53.1% of patients. While, other less common symptoms reported were pain with haematuria, mass per abdomen, pain with mass, and isolated heamaturia (26). Similar findings were observed in a study done by Datta B et al, which reported flank pain and hematuria in around 73.0% and 61.0% of patients, respectively (27). Therefore, all these evidences along with the present study conclude haematuria and flank pain are the common findings among the patients with RCC.
A recent study by Singh A and Urry RJ, studied the intra-and postoperative complications of laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Results concluded that blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower in the laparoscopy group than in open nephrectomy (28). A study by Reifsnyder et al. reported that patients who underwent laparoscopy had more major complications (grades 3 through 5) compared to the patients who underwent open nephrectomy (29). Similar trends were seen in the present study wherein intra- and postoperative complications were more common among patients who underwent open nephrectomy than laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Limitation(s)
The major limitations of this study were its single center, single arm study, and small sample size. This considerably limited the result interpretation and indicates a need for well designed prospective studies to validate these results. Further, this study did not record the fatality status of the patients therefore the study could not carry out survival statistics among patients.
Conclusion
The present study findings suggest that apart from smoking history, demographic characteristics including age, and sex appear to have an impact on RCC development. In addition, intra- and postoperative complications were more common among patients who underwent open nephrectomy than laparoscopic nephrectomy.
Reference
| 1. | Muglia VF, Prando A. Renal cell carcinoma: Histological classification and correlation with imaging findings. Radiol Bras. 2015;48(3):166-74.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 2. | Abraham G, Cherian T, Mahadevan P, Avinash T, George D, Manuel E. Detailed study of survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma in India. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53:572-74.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 3. | Du Plessis D, Van Deventer H, Fernandez P, Van Der Merwe A. A prospective observational study of the epidemiology and pathological profile of RCC in a South African referral centre. Afr J Urol 2020:26:15.
[ CrossRef] | 4. | Safiri S, Kolahi AA, Mansournia MA, Almasi-Hashiani A, Ashrafi-Asgarabad A, Sullman MJM, et al. The burden of kidney cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):13862.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | Cairns P. Renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Biomark 2010;9:461-73.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Hsieh JJ, Purdue MP, Signoretti S, Swanton C, Albiges L, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017;3:17009.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Chow WH, Dong LM, Devesa SS. Epidemiology and risk factors for kidney cancer. Nat Rev Urol. 2010;7(5):245-57.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Weikert S, Ljungberg B. Contemporary epidemiology of renal cell carcinoma: Perspectives of primary prevention. World J Urol. 2010;28(3):247-52.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Joshi A, Anand A, Prabhash K, Noronha V, Shrirangwar S, Bakshi G, et al. Kidney cancer demographics and outcome data from 2013 at a tertiary cancer hospital in India. Indian J Cancer. 2017;54(4):601-04.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Pallagani L, Choudhary GR, Himanshu P, Madduri VKS, Singh M, Gupta P, et al. Epidemiology and clinicopathological profile of renal cell carcinoma: A review from tertiary care referral centre. J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2021;8(1):01-06.
[ CrossRef] | 11. | Agnihotri S, Kumar J, Jain M, Kapoor R, Mandhani A. Renal cell carcinoma in India demonstrates early age of onset & a late stage of presentation. Indian J Med Res. 2014;140(5):624-29.
| 12. | Fuhrman SA, Lasky LC, Limas C. Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1982;6:655-63.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Kidney Cancer Stages. Available from: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/kidney-cancer/detection-diagnosis-staging/staging.html. Accessed on December 24, 2021.
| 14. | Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187-96.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Qu Y, Chen H, Gu W, Gu C, Zhang H, Xu J, et al. Age-dependent association between sex and renal cell carcinoma mortality: A population-based analysis. Sci Rep. 2015;5:9160.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 16. | Lu T, Yang X, Huang Y, Zhao M, Li M, Ma K, et al. Trends in the incidence, treatment, and survival of patients with lung cancer in the last four decades. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:943-53.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 17. | Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020. CA Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(1):07-30.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Kawaljit S, Janak SR, Ashok G, Vishwajeet S. Decadal experience of renal cell carcinoma from a tertiary care teaching institute in North India. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018;9(4):558-64.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 19. | Kumar KA, Sadashivudu G, Krishnamani KV, Linga VG, Maddali LS, Digumarti RR, et al. Managing metastatic renal cell carcinoma-challenges, pitfalls, and outcomes in the real world. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016;37(4):260-64.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | Ray RP, Mahapatra RS, Khullar S, Pal DK, Kundu AK. Clinical characteristics of renal cell carcinoma: Five years review from a tertiary hospital in Eastern India. Indian J Cancer 2016;53:114-17.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 21. | Tsivian M, Moreira DM, Caso JR, Mouraviev V, Polascik TJ. Cigarette smoking is associated with advanced renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(15):2027-31.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Renehan AG, Tyson M, Egger M, Heller RF, Zwahlen M. Body-mass index and incidence of cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective observational studies. Lancet. 2008;371:569-78.
[ CrossRef] | 23. | Wilson KM, Cho E. Obesity and kidney cancer. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2016;208:81-93.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 24. | Liu X, Sun Q, Hou H, Zhu K, Wang Q, Liu H, et al. The association between BMI and kidney cancer risk: An updated dose-response meta-analysis in accordance with PRISMA guideline. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(44):e12860.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 25. | Liu Y, Zhou L, Chen Y, Liao B, Ye D, Wang K, et al. Hypertension as a prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2019;19(1):49.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 26. | Yamakanamardi B, Rani H, Dinesh US. Study of histopathological spectrum of renal neoplasms in nephrectomy specimens from a tertiary hospital in North Karnataka, India. Nat J Lab Med. 2018;7(3):PO05-PO11.
| 27. | Datta B, Giri A, Halder B. Histopathological evaluation of surgically treated adult renal tumors: Report from a tertiary care center in India. Indian J Cancer. 2016;53(1):124-26.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 28. | Singh A, Urry RJ. Laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy in resource-constrained developing world hospitals: A retrospective analysis. Afr J Urol. 2020:26:85.
[ CrossRef] | 29. | Reifsnyder JE, Ramasamy R, Ng CK, Dipietro J, Shin B, Shariat SF, et al. Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: Complication comparison using the Clavien system. JSLS. 2012;16(1):38-44. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/51677.16637
Date of Submission: Jul 31, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Dec 06, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Feb 11, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 02, 2021
• Manual Googling: Feb 10, 2022
• iThenticate Software: May 16, 2022 (10%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|