Year :
2022
| Month :
July
| Volume :
16
| Issue :
7
| Page :
QC06 - QC09
Full Version
Role of Uterine Artery Doppler at 11-14 Weeks of Pregnancy in Early Prediction of Preeclampsia: A Prospective Cohort Study
Published: July 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/57212.16591
Uttara Gupta, Pooja Namdeo, Neelam Patel
1. Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
2. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
3. Postgraduate Student, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Uttara Gupta,
Flat No-9, Sr MIG, B Block, People’s Medical College Campus,
Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
E-mail: uttaragupta.rntmc@gmail.com
Abstract
Introduction: Doppler ultrasonography, by comparing systolic and diastolic waveforms helps in assessment of uteroplacental circulation. Since preeclampsia has ethnic and geographical variations, it is important to understand the prediction modalities in various populations.
Aim: To investigate the role of elevated Pulsatility Index (PI) and presence of diastolic notch using uterine artery doppler in early pregnancy in predicting development of preeclampsia among pregnant women.
Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant females visiting the antenatal clinic or Outpatient Department or admitted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, from November 2019 to October 2021. All cases were subjected to uterine artery doppler study, between 11-14 weeks of pregnancy, to note pulsatility index and diastolic notch. All the participants were then screened periodically during their antenatal visits for development of features of preeclampsia and were followed-up monthly upto 20 weeks, every 15 days upto 32 weeks and then, weekly till delivery. Pregnancy outcome were measured in terms of presence or absence of preeclampsia. Data was compiled using Microsoft Excel and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM software version 20.0. Categorical data was expressed as frequency and proportions, whereas, continuous data was expressed as mean and standard deviation.
Results: The present study was conducted on a total of 116 cases with the mean age of 26.75±4.31 years. Out of 116 cases, 26 cases developed preeclampsia. Diastolic notch was present in 17 cases (65.4%) patients with preeclampsia and 23 cases (25.6%) non preeclampsia patients. Pulsatility index of more than 1.71 was noted in 14 cases (53.8%) cases with preeclampsia, whereas, 87 cases (96.7%) with non preeclampsia had pulsatility index of less than 1.71. The specificity of diastolic notch 74.4% where as that of pulsatility index was 96.7% and the diagnostic accuracy of diastolic notch 72.4%, whereas, that of pulsatility index was 87.1%.
Conclusion: Uterine artery doppler is a promising tool for predicting development of preeclampsia by analysing both PI as well as diastolic notch in uterine artery. Doppler had high overall diagnostic accuracy for preeclampsia.
Keywords
Antenatal, Diastolic notch, Early second trimester, Preeclampsia third trimester, Pulsatility index
Introduction
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are the second most common cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality globally.Hypertensive disorders complicate approximately 5 to 10% of all pregnancies worldwide (1). However in India the incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy is 10 to 12% (2). Among various hypertensive disorders, Preeclampsia (PE) characterised by new onset hypertension and proteinurea (more than 20 weeks of gestation) is most common cause of maternal morbidity and mortality (3),(4). The key element of providing antenatal care is identification of high risk cases early (preferably in first trimester) so as to initiate management and minimise the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome (5). A wide range of biomarkers for prediction of preeclampsia have been recommended such as maternal characteristics (body mass index, co-morbidities), a disintegrin and metalloproteinase 12 (ADAM12), Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A), soluble Fms like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1), placental growth factor, Placental Protein 13 (PP13), doppler ultrasonography (6),(7).
Doppler Ultrasound (USG) is a non invasive invaluable tool in management of high risk cases. Though, the direct assessment of trophoblastic invasion could not be observed, doppler ultrasonography, by comparing systolic and diastolic waveforms helps in assessment of uteroplacental circulation (8),(9). Uterine artery is the most commonly studied vessel for doppler evaluation. The parameters used for assessment for uteroplacental insufficiency includes early diastolic notch, pulsatility or resistance index of uterine artery (10),(11). Literature suggests that doppler ultrasonography of uterine artery for detection of preeclampsia is very useful during 12 to 16 weeks of gestation (12),(13). However, some studies highlighted its utility in third trimester for predicting haemodynamic alterations and uteroplacental insufficiencies (14).
Early identification of at risk population especially during first trimester and early second trimester might be helpful in commencing appropriate management strategies, thereby reducing the risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcome (15),(16). With the above background, authors aimed to investigate the role of elevated Pulsatility Index (PI) and presence of diastolic notch using uterine artery doppler, in early pregnancy (late first trimester/or early second trimester) in predicting development of preeclampsia among the pregnant women visiting antenatal clinic in a tertiary care hospital.
Material and Methods
A prospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant females visiting the antenatal clinic or Outpatient Department or admitted in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at People’s College of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India, from November 2019 to October 2021. Institute Ethical Committee approval was obtained {IEC No.:PCMS/OD/2019/1440(4)} and written informed consent from all study participants were taken.
Sample size calculation: As per formula,
N=Zα2[pxq]/d2
Where, Zα is from probability table and 2 Standard Errors (SE) corresponds to 1.96
p was prevalence if preeclampsia i.e. 5.4% (approximately 6%). Prevalence was included from National Health Portal of India. (https://www.nhp.gov.in/disease/gynaecology-and-obstetrics/preeclampsia).
q was 1-p, when p is in decimal terms (1-0.06=0.94).
d was precision of estimate i.e. 5%
Substituting these values,
N=(1.96)2[0.06*0.94]/(0.05)2=90.24
Actual sample size= 90.24+10%of 90.24=100
Inclusion and Exclusion criteria: All females with singleton pregnancy between 11-14 weeks of gestation were included in the study. Patients with gross foetal malformation on Ultrasonography (USG) (like anencephaly, meningomyelocele), were on treatment with aspirin, heparin or antihypertensives, known case of essential hypertension, history of Pregnancy Induced Hypertension (PIH) in previous pregnancy, with multiple pregnancy, who had miscarriage on follow-up, critically ill patients were excluded from the study.
Detailed data regarding socio-demographic variables such as age, education, socio-economic status were obtained from all the study participants (17). Obstetric history was obtained in detail and any history of complications in previous pregnancy was noted. Further, all the cases were subjected to detailed general, systemic and obstetric examination. Blood pressure was recorded after 10 minutes rest, at 45 degrees tilt and cuff at the level of heart. Routine investigations were conducted including antenatal investigation, liver function test, kidney function test, blood test, Bleeding Time (BT), Clotting Time (CT), activated partial thromboplastin time/international normalised ratio, prothrombin time, fibrin degradation products.
Procedure
All cases were subjected to doppler study, between 11-14 weeks of pregnancy (using convex 4 MHz probe), to note the following two indices (Table/Fig 1)a,(Table/Fig 1)b:
• Pulsatility Index (PI): Parameter obtained from maximum, minimum and blood flow velocity in uterine artery during a cardiac cycle. In the present study, cut-off of PI value was taken as >1.71 (18).
PI=(Vmax-Vmin)/(Vmean)
Or
PI=(peak systolic flow-peak diastolic flow)/(mean flow)
PI of right and left uterine arteries was measured and mean PI was calculated.
• Diastolic notch: Diastolic notching was described as a presence of atrough like notch between systolic and diastolic phases in uterine arterial doppler study. Bilateral uterine arteries were seen for presence/absence of diastolic notch.
All the participants were then screened periodically during their antenatal visits for development of features of preeclampsia like headache, blurring of vision, epigastric pain, vomiting, elevated blood pressure, presence of urine albumin, presence of pedal edema or abdominal wall oedema and weight gain (17). Antenatal care, investigations and treatment were done as per routine protocol practiced in the department.
Patients were periodically followed-up monthly upto 20 weeks, every 15 days upto 32 weeks and then, weekly till delivery. Pregnancy and neonatal outcome were measured in term of pregnancy complications.
Statistical Analysis
Data was compiled using Microsoft Excel and analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) IBM software version 20.0. Categorical data was expressed as frequency and proportions where as continuous data was expressed as mean and standard. Association of doppler findings with outcome was assessed using Chi-square test. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The present study was conducted on a total of 116 cases with the mean age of 26.75±4.31 years. Out of 116 cases, 26 cases developed preeclampsia. The incidence of preeclampsia was higher in females with less education and nulliparous females. The observed difference in gestational age at delivery between two groups was statistically significant (p-value=0.01) (Table/Fig 2).
Diastolic notch was present in 65.4% patients with preeclampsia and 25.6% non preeclampsia patients. Pulsatility index of more than 1.71 was noted in 53.8% cases with preeclampsia where as 96.7% cases with non preeclampsia had PI of less than 1.71. The observed difference in the diastolic notch as well as PI between preeclampsia and non preeclampsia cases was statistically significant (p-value=0.01) (Table/Fig 3).
The sensitivity of diastolic notch in diagnosis of preeclampsia was 65.4% whereas, that of PI was 53.8% (Table/Fig 4).
Pulsatility index of more than 1.7 was significantly associated with adverse foetal outcome in terms of preterm delivery, Intrauterine Growth Restriction (IUGR) and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission (p-value=0.001) and diastolic notch was associated with significantly higher proportions of foetus with intrauterine growth restriction (27.5%) (Table/Fig 5).
In present study, 73.3% and 23.3% non preeclampsia cases had normal doppler findings and presence of diastolic notch respectively. In contrast, 19.2% preeclamptic cases had diastolic notch, 7.7% cases had only raised PI and 46.2% cases had both diastolic notch as well as PI (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 6)
Pulsatility index of more than 1.71 was noted in 14 cases (53.8% cases) with preeclampsia where as 87 cases (96.7% cases) with non preeclampsia had PI <1.71. The observed difference in the PI between preeclampsia and non preeclampsia cases was statistically significant (p-value=0.001) (Table/Fig 7).
Discussion
Preeclampsia is one of the most common cause associated with increased maternal morbidity and mortality all over the world. To reduce the associated complications and maternal morbidity and mortality, it is important to identify and manage the preeclampsia early so as to minimise the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome.USG doppler has been recommended as an invaluable tool for assessment of uteroplacental circulation and early identification of preeclampsia (1). Three parameters are identified and linked with uteroplacental insufficiency and markers of preeclampsia. These include resistance index, pulsatility index and diastolic notch (11).
Kennedy AM and Woodward PJ, documented that diastolic notch during early pregnancy is a normal finding, which begin to disappear by 13 weeks of gestation. Persistence of diastolic notch after 13 weeks may be considered abnormal. And diastolic flow is established clearly by 20 weeks (15),(19),(20). Early diastolic notching represent the reduced diastolic velocities as compared to notching in later part of diastole (21). Bilateral notching is of high significance as compared to unilateral notching; but unilateral notching especially on ipsilateral side of the placental attachment also implies significant association with preeclampsia (20). In present study, diastolic notch was observed insignificantly higher proportions of patients with preeclampsia (65.4%) as compared to those with non preeclamptic patients (25.6%). The current study findings were supported by Bindal J and Chugh N, in which the authors documented diastolic notch in 68.18% cases with preeclampsia (18). Sultana S et al., also also observed diastolic notching in significantly higher proportion of females with preeclampsia (90%) as compared to those with normal pregnancy (5%) (22).
In present study, pulsatility index was raised (>1.71) in 53.8% cases with preeclampsia as compared to 3.3% cases without preeclampsia. Higher in preeclampsia (1.75±0.37) as compared to normal females (1.47±0.21). Bindal J and Chugh N, also documented that significantly higher proportions of cases with preeclampsia had PI>1.71 (p-value <0.05). Concordant findings were documented by Köpük S¸ Y et al., where the authors documented significantly higher proportion so, patients with high PI values in preeclampsia group (p-value=0.023) (18),(23).
In the present study, both pulsatility index and diastolic notch were observed in 46.2% cases of preeclampsia and 2.2% cases with non preeclampsia. However, only diastolic notch and only high pulsatility index was documented in 19.2% and 7.7% cases with preeclampsia. In contrast Bindal J and Chugh N, documented presence of both pulsatility index and diastolic notch in only 12% cases (18). Gomez O et al., documented significantly higher PI and higher prevalence of bilateral notching in patients with preeclampsia (10).
In present study, sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) of diastolic notch for diagnosis of preeclampsia was 65.4%, 74.4%, 42.5% and 88.2% respectively with diagnostic accuracy of 72.4%. Similarly, sensitivity of PI at cut-off of 1.71 was 53.8% whereas, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of PI was higher as compared to diastolic notch. Köpük S¸ Y et al., documented the sensitivity of 42.31% and specificity of 82.10% at the cut-off of >2.23 for detecting preeclampsia (23). Carbillon L, reported high sensitivity of uterine artery doppler at 11-14 weeks for prediction of preeclampsia with low PPV (24). Narang S et al., also showed sensitivity and specificity of PI at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy for detection of preeclampsia as 75.9% and 79.6% respectively (Table/Fig 8) (10),(18),(23),(25).
Limitation(s)
Interobserver error in doppler can be a limiting factor and should be
considered before starting any intervention.
Conclusion
Uterine artery doppler is a promising tool for predicting high risk cases for development of preeclampsia. Both PI as well as diastolic notching uterine artery doppler had high overall diagnostic accuracy for preeclampsia. However, low sensitivity of PI (>1.71) is one of the limiting factor for its use. Thus, doppler of uterine artery can be considered as a good screening method for predicting the risk of preeclampsia at 11-14 weeks of gestation.
Reference
| 1. | Wolde Z, Segni H, Woldie M. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in Jimma University specialized hospital. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2011;21(3):147-54.
| 2. | Gupte S, Wagh G. Preeclampsia–eclampsia. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2014;64(1):04-13.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 3. | Assis TR, Viana FP, Rassi S. Study on the major maternal risk factors in hypertensive syndromes. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2008;91:11-17.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 4. | Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: A systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066-74.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | Kane SC, da Silva Costa F, Brennecke S. First trimester biomarkers in the prediction of later pregnancy complications. Biomed Res Int. 2014.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 6. | Myatt L, Clifton RG, Roberts JM, Spong CY, Hauth JC, Varner MW, et al. The utility of uterine artery Doppler velocimetry in prediction of preeclampsia in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;120(4):815.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Poon LC, Kametas NA, Chelemen T, Leal A, Nicolaides KH. Maternal risk factors for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: A multivariate approach. J Hum Hypertens. 2010;24(2):104-10.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | El-Hamedi A, Shillito J, Simpson NA, Walker JJ. A prospective analysis of the role of uterine artery Doppler waveform notching in the assessment of at-risk pregnancies. Hypertens Pregnancy. 2005;24(2):137-45.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Ghidini A, Locatelli A. Monitoring of fetal well-being: Role of uterine artery Doppler. Semin Perinatol. 2008;32(4):258-62. WB Saunders.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Gomez O, Martinez JM, Figueras F, Del Rio M, Borobio V, Puerto B, et al. Uterine artery Doppler at 11-14 weeks of gestation to screen for hypertensive disorders and associated complications in an unselected population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2005;26(5):490-94.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Schwarze A, Nelles I, Krapp M, Friedrich M, Schmidt W, Diedrich K, et al. Doppler ultrasound of the uterine artery in the prediction of severe complications during low-risk pregnancies. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2005;271(1):46-52.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Vainio M, Kujansuu E, Iso-Mustajärvi M, Mäenpää J. Low dose acetylsalicylic acid in prevention of pregnancy-induced hypertension and intrauterine growth retardation in women with bilateral uterine artery notches. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2002;109(2):161-67.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Rattanapuntamanee O, Uerpairojkit B. Reference range and characteristic of uterine artery doppler in pregnant Thai women at 11-13 | 14. | Cruz-Martinez R, Savchev S, Cruz-Lemini M, Mendez A, Gratacos E, Figueras F. Clinical utility of third-trimester uterine artery doppler in the prediction of brain hemodynamic deterioration and adverse perinatal outcome in small-for-gestational-age fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(3):273-78.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Desai P. Predicting obstetric vasculopathies through study of diastolic notch and other indices of resistance to blood flow in uterine artery. International Journal of Infertility & Fetal Medicine. 2013;4(1):24-30.
[ CrossRef] | 16. | World Health Organization Multi country survey on maternal and newborn health. Geneva, World Health Organization (available at www.who.int/reproductivehealth).
| 17. | Majumder S. Socioeconomic status scales: Revised Kuppuswamy, BG Prasad, and Udai Pareekh’s scale updated for 2021. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021;10(11):3964-67.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Bindal J, Chugh N. Utility of uterine artery Doppler and pulsatility index at 11-14 weeks of normal pregnancy in prediction of preeclampsia in third trimester: Int J Med Res Rev. 2016;4(3):432-36.
[ CrossRef] | 19. | D’Andrea A, Conte M, Scarafile R, Riegler L, Cocchia R, Pezzullo E, et al. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound: Physical principles and principal applications in neurocritical care unit. J Cardiovasc Echogr. 2016;26(2):28.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | Kennedy AM, Woodward PJ. A radiologist’s guide to the performance and interpretation of obstetric doppler US. Radiographics. 2019;39(3):893-10.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 21. | Zhong Y, Tuuli M, Odibo AO. First-trimester assessment of placenta function and the prediction of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction. Prenatal Diagnosis: Prenat Diagn. 2010;30(4):293-308.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Sultana S, Yasmin T, Roy SK, Hossain MS, Al Amin A. Prediction of preeclampsia in pregnant population using diastolic notch of uterine artery by duplex color doppler study. Journal of Enam Medical College. 2020;10(1):33-38.
[ CrossRef] | 23. | Köpük S¸ Y, Çakirog? lu Y, Ceylan Y, Çekmen MB, Yücesoy G. Prediction of preeclampsia by uterine artery doppler examination and placental growth factor, endoglin and pregnancy-associated plasma protein levels in maternal serum at 11-13 | 24. | Carbillon L. First trimester uterine artery doppler for the prediction of preeclampsia and foetal growth restriction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(7):877-83.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 25. | Narang S, Agarwal A, Das V, Pandey A, Agrawal S, Ali W. Prediction of pre- eclampsia at 11-14 weeks of pregnancy using mean arterial pressure, uterine artery doppler and pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2016;5(11):3948-53. Doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20163869. [ CrossRef] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/57212.16591
Date of Submission: Apr 20, 2022
Date of Peer Review: May 10, 2022
Date of Acceptance: Jun 13, 2022
Date of Publishing: Jul 01, 2022
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. No
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 28, 2022
• Manual Googling: May 07, 2022
• iThenticate Software: Jun 11, 2022 (10%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|