Year :
2022
| Month :
February
| Volume :
16
| Issue :
2
| Page :
RR01 - RR04
Full Version
Management of Closed Tendoachilles Rupture- A Case Series
Published: February 1, 2022 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2022/52167.15938
R Anil, Avinash Prabhu, Niranjan Kumar
1. Associate Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad,
Karnataka, India.
2. Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
3. Professor and Head, Department of Plastic Surgery, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara University, Dharwad,
Karnataka, India.
Correspondence Address :
Avinash Prabhu,
Department of Plastic Surgery, Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of
Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: dravinashprabhu@gmail.com
Abstract
Tendoachilles is the most commonly ruptured tendon of lower limb. Forced eccentric loading on plantar flexed foot is the common cause for the rupture. Even though the frequency of this tendon rupture is high, the mode of treatment is still debatable. Here the authors describe case series of operative management of closed acute tendoachilles ruptures. Eleven cases are hereby presented who underwent this technique of surgery from January 2018 to December 2020. Mean age of patients was 36.54 years. All patients were operated electively under spinal anaesthesia. Postoperative period was uneventful with no complications observed. Physiotherapy was started after removal of cast and independent full weight bearing walking was observed between 8th to 11th postoperative weeks. This is a simple technique of repair of ruptured tendoachilles. Meticulous dissection is the requirement to avoid wound complication. Planned immobilisation followed by physiotherapy helps in early recovery of the patient.
Keywords
Acute closed ruptures, Modified Kessler’s technique, Open surgical technique
Introduction
Tendoachilles tendon is the strongest and largest tendon in the body. Recently, there is a sharp rise in overall incidence of tendoachilles rupture (1),(2). This is mainly due to aging of the population, increase in the prevalence of obesity and inclination in participation of sports (3). The most frequent mechanism of tendoachilles injury is forced eccentric loading of a plantar flexed foot, but may also occur as a result of direct trauma or as the end result of achilles paratenonitis with or without tendinosis. Most of the tendoachilles tears occur in the substance of the tendon, approximately two to six cm above the calcaneal insertion (4),(5),(6),(7).
Ambroise Pare described the treatment of ruptured tendoachilles in 1575 by taping and cast application (8). Although the frequency of rupture of achilles tendon is high and there is long history of its treatment, the best mode of treatment is debatable.
In the early 20th century, non operative management of ruptured achilles tendon was widely accepted. However, with increase in functional demands of patients and improved surgical techniques operative management has become more popular treatment method.
Case Report
This case series includes 11 patients diagnosed of closed tendoachilles rupture who were treated over a period of three years from January 2018 to December 2020. Cases with isolated closed tendoachilles ruptures were included. Open tendoachilles injuries and cases with associated other injuries were excluded.
All the cases were operated by single surgeon at same centre. Data collected from the hospital records included patient details like age, sex, occupation, aetiology of rupture of tendoachilles and presence of any other co-morbidities. History of the patient and clinical findings were noted. All the patients had positive Thompson’s test (4). X-ray of the involved leg was performed to look for avulsion of the tendon from its insertion which might result in calcaneum fracture. Preoperatively, a single dose of injection cefotaxime was administered. An above knee fibre glass cast was applied for three weeks which was later revised to below knee and was retained for another three weeks. Cast was removed after six weeks and patient was subjected to physiotherapy. Patients were followed-up for a minimum duration of six months to maximum of two years.
Surgical technique: All patients were operated under spinal anaesthesia in prone position. Skin of the affected leg was prepared and under pneumatic tourniquet control a lazy S incision was made on the medial border of tendoachilles (Table/Fig 1). Dissection was performed under loupe magnification and cut ends of the tendons were visualised (Table/Fig 2). Care was taken not to damage the paratenon on the tendon. No tendon lengthening procedures were carried in any of the cases as the gap between the cut ends was minimal.
The cut ends of the tendoachilles was repaired by employing four strands Strickland’s modification of Kessler’s repair using number 2 polyethelene terephthalate and the paratenon was sutured using number 3-0 polypropylene in a circumferential way (Table/Fig 3). Haemostasis was achieved and the incision was closed in two layers (Table/Fig 4). Wound dressings performed and elastocrepe bandage was applied. This was followed with fibre-glass above knee cast application immobilising ankle at around 20o plantar flexion and knee at around 45o flexion. Patient was discharged on postoperative day two. Patient was asked to mobilise with assistance with no weight bearing on the operated limb. Partial weight bearing was allowed after removal of the fibre glass cast with assistance for one week followed by independent walking with complete weight bearing.
In the present case series, 11 patients underwent open surgical correction of tendoachilles in a period of three years. Majority of the study population constituted of males, n=9 (81.82%) compared to females, n=2 (18.18%). Age of the patients ranged from 18 to 60 years with mean age of 36.54±16.81 years. Side of injury was on left side in six (54.54%) patients and on right side in five (45.45%) patients. Aetiology of tendon rupture in all cases was due to increased physical exertion (Table/Fig 5), (Table/Fig 6). Immediate postoperative period was uneventful. No local complications at the operated site in the form of wound infection, wound dehiscence, skin necrosis, re-rupture of sutured tendoachilles was found. Physiotherapy was started after removal of cast on the 7th postoperative week. Independent full weight bearing walking was performed by patients between 8th to 10th postoperative week. Single heel raise test was observed in the operated limb in all patients (Table/Fig 7) (9). Postoperative images shown in (Table/Fig 8), (Table/Fig 9).
Discussion
The tendoachilles is formed by the tendons of gastrocnemius and soleus and is the thickest and strongest tendon in the human body (10). Acute rupture of tendoachilles is a common sports injury, accounting for 35% of all tendon injuries (11). The mechanisms of injury are sudden forced plantar flexion of the foot, unexpected dorsiflexion of the foot and violent dorsiflexion of a plantar flexed foot (12). The prevalence is approximately 18 per 100,000 per year (13).
Ambroise Pare described the tendoachilles injuries in 1575 (8). This was followed by Petit and John Hunter. Polaillon performed the first open repair of ruptured tendoachilles in 1888. The major series of Achilles tendon injuries was reported for the first time in 1929 (14). Surgical treatment was well popularised in 1920s, however equally good results were obtained in conservative management (15),(16). Current advancements made in surgical technique have made non operative methods unjustifiable. The trend present now favours surgical repair of tendoachilles and early supervised weight bearing (17).
Aetiological factors of acute rupture of tendoachilles are many, but exact pathology is undefined. It has been observed that rupture rates are more common in previously abnormal tendons (12),(18), people with mechanical abnormalities of foot (19), adverse drug reactions (20),(21) and because of exercise induced hyperthermia (22). Diagnosis of acute rupture of tendoachilles is clinical and is the favoured method. Clinical diagnosis may be aided by ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (23).
Treatment of acute rupture of tendoachilles is debatable. Recent literatures have favoured surgical treatment for an acute rupture as it minimises the risk of re-rupture and have better functional outcome (24),(25). Wound infection leading to wound dehiscence and skin necrosis is one of the main complications encountered in open surgical repair of tendoachilles. Infection and wound problems mostly occur following surgical repair with an incidence of 12.5% (26),(27). In the present series, authors noticed no infection at the wound site. Rettig AC et al., in a series of 89 open repairs, reported 4% wound infection rate (28). Cetti R et al., found wound infection in two cases out of 111 cases operated by open technique in a level I prospective study (29). Skin healing complication rate was 14.6% in a quantitative review done by Wong J et al., (30).
Tendon re-rupture is found as one of the most important consideration in selecting the surgical method of treating rupture of tendoachilles versus non operative technique. Authors noticed no re-rupture of operated tendoachilles in the follow-up period. Rettig AC et al., in their series reported 4% of re-rupture of tendoachilles (28). Cetti R et al., have reported 4% of re-rupture in their study (29). Tendoachilles re-rupture rate of 2.2% was observed in the study by Wong J et al., (30).
Conclusion
Open surgical repair is one of the preferred techniques in managing acute rupture of tendoachilles. Proper immobilisation followed by physiotherapy aids in early recovery and independent full weight bearing walking.
Reference
| 1. | Huttunen TT, Kannus P, Rolf C, Fellander-Tsai L, Mattila VM. Acute achilles tendon ruptures: Incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(10):2419-23.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 2. | Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Leppilahti J. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures: increasing incidence over a 33-year period. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(1):e133-38.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 3. | Raikin SM, Garras DN, Krapchev PV. Achilles tendon injuries in a United States population. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34(4):475-80.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 4. | Maffulli N. Rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1019-36.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 5. | Lagergren C, Lindholm A. Vascular distribution in the Achilles tendon; An angiographic and microangiographic study. Acta Chir Scand. 1959;116:491-95.
| 6. | Viidik A. Tensile strength properties of Achilles tendon systems in trained and untrained rabbits. Acta Orthop Scand. 1969;40:261-72.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 7. | Schepsis AA, Jones H, Haas AL. Achilles tendon disorders in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:287-305.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Pare A. Les oeuvres. Lyon (France): Claude Rigaud and Claude Obert; 1633.
| 9. | Olsson N, Karlsson J, Eriksson BI. Ability to perform a single heel-rise is significantly related to patient-reported outcome after Achilles tendon rupture. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2012.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 10. | Khan SA, Khan RM, Siddiqi MM. Failed gastric tube insertion in the LMAProSeal. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(8):826-27.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Józsa L, Kvist M, Bálint BJ, Reffy A, Järvinen M, Lehto M, et al. The role of recreational sport activity in Achilles tendon rupture. A clinical, pathoanatomical, and sociological study of 292 cases. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:338-43.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Arner O, Lindholm A. Subcutaneous rupture of the Achilles tendon; a study of 92 cases. Acta Chir Scand. 1959;116(Suppl. 239):0151.
| 13. | Leppilahti J, Puranen J, Orava S. Incidence of Achilles tendon rupture. Act Orthop Scand. 1996;67(3):277-79.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 14. | Klenerman L. The early history of tendoAchillis and its rupture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(4):545-47. Qenu J, Stoinovich. Les ruptures du tendondachille. Rev de chirug.1929;67:647-78.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Nistor L. Surgical and non surgical treatment of Achilles Tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63(3):394-99.
[ CrossRef] | 16. | Thermann H, Frerichs O, Biewener A, Krettek C, Schandelmeier P. Functional treatment of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon. An experimental biomechanical study. Unfallchirurg 1995;98(10):507-13.
| 17. | Costa ML, MacMillan K, Halliday D, Chester R, Shepstone L, Robinson AH, et al. Randomised controlled trials of immediate weight-bearing mobilisation for rupture of the tendoAchillis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88(1):69-77.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Tallon C, Maffulli N, Ewen SW. Ruptured Achilles tendons are significantly more degenerated than tendinopathic tendons. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;33(12):1983-90.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 19. | Clement DB, Taunton JE, Smart GW. Achilles tendinitis and peritendinitis: Etiology and treatment. Am J Sports Med., 1984;12(3):179-84.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | Mahler F, Fritschy D. Partial and complete ruptures of the Achilles tendon and local corticosteroid injections. Br J Sports Med. 1992;26(1):07-14.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 21. | Newnham DM, Douglas JG, Legge JS, Friend JA. Achilles tendon rupture: An underrated complication of corticosteroid treatment. Thorax. 1991;46(11):853-54.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Wilson AM, Goodship AE. Exercise-induced hyperthermia as a possible mechanism for tendon degeneration. J Biomech. 1994;27(7):899-905.
[ CrossRef] | 23. | Maffulli N, Dymond NP, Regine R. Surgical repair of ruptured Achilles tendon in sportsmen andsedentary patients: A longitudinal ultrasound assessment. Int J Sports Med. 1990;11(1):78-84.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 24. | Amendola N. Surgical treatment of acute rupture of the tendoAchillis led to fewer re-ruptures and better patient-generated ratings than did nonsurgical treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002;84(2):324.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 25. | Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Siddiqui F, Morrow F, Busse J, Leighton RK, et al. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A systematic overview and metaanalysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;400:190-200.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 26. | Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, Kaufman A, Glazebrook M. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(23):2136-43.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 27. | Kadakia AR, Dekker RG 2nd, Ho BS. Acute Achilles tendon ruptures: An update on treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017;25(1):23-31.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 28. | Rettig AC, Liotta FJ, Klootwyk TE, et al. Potential risks of rerupture in primary achilles tendon repair in athletes younger than 30 years of age. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:119-23.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 29. | Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, Porter DA, Mieling P. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:791-99.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 30. | Wong J, Barrass V, Maffulli N. Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:565-75. [ CrossRef] [ PubMed] |
DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2022/52167.15938
Date of Submission: Aug 29, 2021
Date of Peer Review: Oct 06, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Nov 03, 2021
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2022
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Aug 31, 2021
• Manual Googling: Nov 02, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Dec 20, 2021 (5%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|