Year :
2011
| Month :
October
| Volume :
5
| Issue :
5
| Page :
1043 - 1045
Full Version
Physiological
Changes of Intraocular Pressure
(IOP) in the Second and Third Trimesters
of Normal Pregnancy
Published: October 1, 2011 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2011/.1528
PITTA PARAMJYOTHI, A.N.R. LAKSHMI, D. SUREKHA
MBBS, MD in Physiology
Assistant Professor of Physiology
Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal
Andhra Pradesh, India..
MBBS, MD in Physiology
Professor& HOD of Physiology
Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal
Andhra Pradesh, India..
MBBS, MD in Physiology
Assistant Professor of Physiology
Kakatiya Medical College, Warangal
Andhra Pradesh, India.
Correspondence Address :
Pitta Paramjyothi
H.No.24-7-199/1/1
Devinagar Colony, Near NIT
P.O. Rec, Kazipet, Dist: Warangal
Andhrapradesh, India- 506004
Phone: 09849163282
E-mail: paramjyothi@gmail.com
Abstract
Background: Numerous physiological changes occur in the body during pregnancy and the eye is no exception. Pregnancy brings in an increase in hormones that may cause changes in the vision by altering the strength of refraction. The temporary changes in the vision will return to normal after the delivery.
Aim: To study the physiological IOP changes in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, as pregnancy affects the preexisting ocular conditions such as diabetic retinopathy, toxaemia of pregnancy, tumours and immunological disorders, but it can have beneficial effects on one such pre-existing condition such as glaucoma.
Settings and Design: In the present study, the IOP in the right and left eyes was recorded by Schioltz tonometry in the secondand third trimester pregnant women of the age group 20-30 years, who were without any refractive error presently and previously.
Methods and Material: The IOP changes of 30 pregnant women in the second trimester were compared to that of 30 pregnant women in the third trimester.
Statistical Analysis: The data which was obtained was analyzed by using the Student’s t-test.
Results: During the second and third trimesters, the p values of the IOP in both the eyes are highly significant (<0.0001).
Conclusion: The physiological decrease in the IOP during pregnancy is due to an increase in the aqueous outflow because of the influence of increased progesterone and the beta subunit of the human chorionic gonadotrophin levels.
Keywords
Pregnant Women, IOP (Intra Ocular Pressure), Schiotz Tonometry, Second Trimester, Third Trimester
Introduction
Introduction
Pregnancy implies progressive anatomical and physiological changes that are not only confined to the reproductive organs, but also to all the systems of the body. The tendency of fluid retention affects refraction. As a result, the current spectacles (or) contact lenses may temporarily be either too weak or too strong, depending upon the specific refractive error.
Very few reports are available, which indicate the effect of pregnancy on the IOP changes. As compared to normo-tensive women, preeclampsia women have increased IOP in the peripartum period(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(7),(8) (9). Ocular and systemic parasympathetic involvement appears earlier than the sympathetic involvement in diabetic patients(10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15) (16).
A very high systemic BP causes the development of hypertensive retinopathy with bleeding in the retina and retinal detachment which may progress to permanent visual impairment (17),(18) if untreated.
Pregnancy involves a number of endocrine interactions and so, in the present study, we tried to observe the physiological changes of IOP in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy to be aware of the vision changes and to know as to which symptoms indicated a serious problem.
Material and Methods
Subjects
A total of 60 subjects of the age-group of 20-30 years participated in this study. The inclusion criteria for the selection of the subjects was pregnant women with a known last menstrual period, regular ante-natal check-ups and with no history of previous abortion, without any refractive error or systemic disease presently and previously.
The subjects were selected from the Government Maternity Hospital, Hanamkonda and the Chandrakanthaiah Memorial Hospital,Warangal. No financial burden was imposed on the subjects. Prior to the study, each subject was informed in detail about its objective, the aim of the research protocol and the method which had to be used and their consent was taken. Along with the routine lab investigations, ante-natal examinations and the local examination of both the eyes was performed.
The foot plate of the lower end of the plunger of the Schiotz tonometer was sterilized. After anaesthetising the cornea with 4% topical xylocaine, the subject was made to lie supine on a coach and was instructed to fix his/her eyes at a target on the ceiling. Then, by separating the eyelids with the left hand gently, the foot plate of the tonometer was rested vertically on the centre of the cornea. The reading on the scale was recorded as soon as the needle became steady. The tonometer was lifted and a drop of antibiotic was instilled. A conversion table was then used to derive the IOP in mm of Hg from the scale reading and the plunger weight.
Statistics
The data which was obtained was analyzed by using the unpaired Student’s t-test for the difference of the means with unequal variances for statistical analysis.
Results
The mean and standard deviation of the IOPs of the right and left eyes have been compared in the (Table/Fig 1)(Table/Fig 2)(Table/Fig 3). The IOP measurement was done in 30 pregnant women in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy each. The IOP of the pregnant women in the second trimester was compared to that of the pregnant women in the third trimester. There was a significant decrease in the IOP in the third trimester of pregnancy (p < 0.0001) as compared to that in the second trimester of pregnancy.
Discussion
The IOP decreases steadily from the second trimester to the third trimester due to hormonal and circulatory changes during pregnancy. The increased levels of oestrogen, progesterone and other placental hormones during pregnancy may play an important role in maintaining the IOP. The tendency of fluid retention affects refraction. The temporary changes in the vision will return to normal after the delivery.
Earlier studies have revealed the effects of pregnancy on the eyes, which in addition to new changes, and pre-existing ocular disorders,may change their course owing to the widespread hormonal and other changes during pregnancy that may get either exacerbated or ameliorated (14). The p-value of < 0.0001 in our study correlated with the findings of previous studies on both the eyes.
During pregnancy, the aqueous production is normal, but the facility of the aqueous out flow is increased because of the influence of increased progesterone and the beta subunit of the HCG levels and decreased episcleral venous pressure which is related to a generalized reduction in the peripheral vascular resistance. This results in a gradual, statistically significant fall of the IOP during pregnancy (15).
Progesterone has glucocorticoid antagonistic properties and this antagonistic action helps in the lowering of the IOP. The changes in the aqueous dynamics are consistent with the hypothesis that excess progesterone, during pregnancy, blocks the ocular hypertensive effect of endogenous corticosteroids (17).
Oestrogen’s protective activity in the vascular pathology influences the production and the effects of endothelial derived substancessuch as NO, endothelin-I and eicosonoids, thus introducing a final effect of vasodilatation and resistance reduction(19),(20),(21),(22),(23),(24)(25).
Oestradiol, in particular, increases the NO and prostacyclin activities, both with vasodilative action and it also appears to reduce the response capacity of the unstriated musculature to endothelin-I.
The decrease in the IOP could be advantageous to patients who suffer from glaucoma.Therefore, along with the routine antenatal investigations, it is important to be aware of the IOP changes during pregnancy, to focus on the early diagnosis and prevention of pre-eclampsia in pregnant women.
Acknowledgement
We did not receive any paid support from JCDR for the preparation of this manuscript.
Reference
| 1. | IOP trends in pregnancy and in the 3rd trimester hypertensive patients. Aota Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Oct; 75(9): 816-9 . | 2. | β –HCG, progesterone and aqueous dynamics during pregnancy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994 Jun; 112(6): 801-6. | 3. | Avasthi P, Luthra MC. Effects of sex hormones on intraocular pressure. Int Surg 1967;48:350-5. | 4. | Bengtsson B. Some factors which affect the distribution of IOP in a population. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 1972; 50: 33-46. | 5. | Bill A. Blood circulation and fluid dynamics in the eye. Physiological Rev 1975; 55: 383-417. | 6. | Bill A. The role of ciliary body blood flow and ultra-filtration in aqueous humour formation. Exp Eye Res 1973; 16: 287-98. | 7. | Damji KF, Find all citations by this author (default). Muni RH, Find all citations by this author (default). Or filter your current search Munger RM. Influence of corneal variables on the accuracy of intraocular pressure measurement. Journal of Glaucoma 2003; 12(1):69-80. | 8. | Davis EA, Dana MR. Pregnancy and the eye, In; Albert DM, Jacobiek FA. Editors. Principles and Practice of Ophthalmology, Second Edition. Vol 5, W.B.Saunders Co. Philadelphia 2000; 4: 767-83. | 9. | Giannina G, Belfort MA, Abadejos P, Dorman K. Comparison of IOP between normotensive and pre-eclamptic women in the peripartum period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997 May; 176(5): 1052-5. | 10. | Green K, Find all citations by this author (default). Or filter your current searchPhillips CI, Find all citations by this author (default). Or filter your current search Cheeks L, Find all citations by this author (default). Or filter your current search Slagle T . The aqueous humor flow rate and intraocular pressure during and after pregnancy. Ophthalmic Research. 1988; 20(6):353-7. | 11. | Imre J. The influence of the endocrine system on intraocular tension. Endocrinology 1922; 6:213 – 7. | 12. | Imre J. Pregnancy and the eye, their endocrinological relations. XV Concilium Ophthalmol Egypt III. 1937; 213-26. | 13. | Changes in the IOP during pregnancy. Klin Oozna. 2004 ; 106(1-2): 238 -9. | 14. | Gupta P, Gupta R, Bajaj S, Malik KS. Effects of pregnancy on the eyes. Ophthalmology Today 2003;May-July;4(3). | 15. | Pilas-Pomykalska M, Luczak M, Czajkowski J, Woznjak P, Oszwkowski. Changes in intra ocular pressure during pregnancy. P Klin Oozna. 2004; 106(1-2): 238-9. | 16. | Quershi IA. IOP and pregnancy; a comparison between normal and ocular hypertensive subjects. Arch Med Res. 1997 Autumn; 20(3): 397-400. | 17. | Qureshi IA. Intraocular pressure: association with menstrual cycle, pregnancy and menopause in apparently healthy women. Chin J Physiol. 1995; 38(4):229-34. | 18. | Qureshi IA. Measurements of intraocular pressure throughout the pregnancy in Pakistani women. Chin Med Sci J. 1997 Mar; 12(1):53-. | 19. | Qureshi IA, Xi XR, Wu XD. Intraocular pressure trends in pregnancy and in the third trimester hypertensive patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1996 Oct;75(9):816-9. | 20. | Qureshi IA, Xi XR, Wu XD, Pasha N, Huang YB. Effect of the third trimester of pregnancy on the diurnal variation of ocular pressure. Chin Med Sci J. 1997 Dec; 12(4):240-3. | 21. | Romanet JP, Maurent-Palombi K, Noël C, Bourdon L, Pépin JL, Mouillon M, Buguet A, et al. Nyctohemeral variations in intraocular pressure. Fr Ophtalmol. 2004 Sep; 27 Spec No. 2:2S19-2S26. | 22. | Sunness JS. The pregnant woman’s eye. Surv. Ophthalmol 1998; 32: 219-38. | 23. | Toris CB, Camras CB, Yablonski ME, Brubaker RF. Effects of exogenous prostaglandins on aqueous humor dynamics and bloodaqueous barrier function. Survey of Ophthalmology 1997 Feb;41(2): S69-75. | 24. | Vitale B F, Nuzzi R, Pea A. The eye and pregnancy. Minerva Ginecol. 1991 Apr; 43(4):141-67. | 25. | Ziai N, Org SJ, Khan AR, Brubaker RF. Beta-human chorionic gonadotrophin, progesterone and aqueous dynamics during pregnancy. Arch Ophthalmol 1994 Jun; 112(6): 801-6. |
|