Year :
2021
| Month :
August
| Volume :
15
| Issue :
8
| Page :
ZC13 - ZC16
Full Version
Anneroth’s Histopathological Grading System in Non Metastatic and Metastatic Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma- A Pilot Study
Published: August 1, 2021 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2021/49249.15223
Ambika Murugesan, Sekar Balakrishnan, Manoj Chandrasekar, K Indrapriyadharshini, Ravi Saranyan, E Manivannan, M Rajmohan
1. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
2. Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
3. Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Vinayaka Missions Sankarachariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
4. Associate Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
5. Professor and Head, Department of Periodontology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
6. Professor and Head, Department of Pharmacology, VMKV Medical College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
7. Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, KSR Institute of
Correspondence Address :
Dr. Ambika Murugesan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology,
Vinayaka Mission’s Sankar Achariyar Dental College, VMRF (DU), Sankakiri Main Road, Ariyanoor, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: drambika@vmsdc.edu.in
Abstract
Introduction: Prognostic evaluation of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) is mainly based on [Tumour (T), Nodes (N), and Metastases (M)] staging. To predict the biological and clinical behaviour of a tumour, histological grading systems plays an important role. Modified Anneroth’s grading system includes three parameters each for histologic features and tumour-host relationship.
Aim: To compare and analyse the histological features of tumour center and periphery of non metastatic and metastatic OSCC according to Anneroth’s histopathological classification and its association with regional lymph node metastasis.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective pilot study was conducted on 20 histopathologically proven cases of OSCC collected from the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. The OSCC cases those reported from March 2018 to June 2020 were included in the study. Among 20 cases, 10 non metastatic and 10 metastatic cases, were retrieved from archival blocks. Scores for the morphology and tumour-host relationship of non metastatic and metastatic tumours was assessed and graded by Anneroth’s grading system; then compared with the Broder's histopathological grading system. The histopathological scoring of lymph node was based on TNM staging. Chi-square test and Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis was done.
Results: Anneroth’s grading system showed a significant difference in pattern of invasion in tumour periphery of metastatic OSCC (p-value=0.01). Compared to Broder’s, Anneroth’s classification showed a highly significant corelation with lymph node metastasis (p-value=0.001).
Conclusion: Hence, Anneroth’s histopathological grading system can be used to predict the biological changes in metastatic and non metastatic OSCC and its increased possibility of regional lymph node metastasis.
Keywords
Anneroth’s grading system, Metastatic oral squamous cell carcinoma, Tumour periphery
Introduction
Oral cancer ranks sixth among all the types of cancer globally, with 450,000 new cases and 350,000 deaths annually worldwide. In India, oral cancer has been reported with 77,000 new cases and 52,000 deaths annually (1),(2). The prognosis of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC) depends on clinical, pathological and molecular factors (3). Among the clinical factors, TNM staging of cervical lymph nodes plays a vital role in determining prognosis of the OSCC (4). It is the uncontrolled growth rate and variation in pattern of spread by the tumour cells reflects that TNM staging alone is not sufficient in determining the prognosis (5). For better analysis of cellular and nuclear details by histochemical and immunohistochemical markers; understanding the biological behaviour of tumour is mandatory (6). Conventional histopathological grading system i.e., Broder’s grading system is the gold standard for grading OSCC. The system grades tumour cells based on their differentiation (well/moderate/poorly differentiated and undifferentiated). Hence, differentiation of tumour alone is not sufficient for predicting the biological behaviour of the tumour, because of the heterogenous population.
Anneroth’s grading system is based on six parameters for assessing and grading the tumour based on tumour cell population and tumour-host relationship. Thus, the grading system is more specific and helps in predicting prognosis. Many studies have reported increased alterations in the biological behaviour of tumour population in periphery of the tumour (5),(7),(8) when compared to the tumour center, which determines the invasiveness and metastatic potential of a tumour.
In this study, Anneroth’s system was applied to grade the histopathological aspects of tumour center and periphery, to analyse the biological behaviour of the tumour. The study also aimed to look for possible correlation between the Anneroth’s grading system and TNM staging.
Material and Methods
A retrospective pilot study was conducted on histopathologically proven cases of OSCC collected from the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Microbiology, Vinayaka Mission’s Sankarachariyar Dental College, Salem, Tamil Nadu, India. The OSCC cases that reported from March 2018 to June 2020 were included in the study. The Institutional Ethical Committee, VMRF (DU) approved the study (VMSDC/IEC/Approval No 185).
Inclusion criteria: Archival blocks and slides of histopathological proven cases of OSCC were retrieved along with the clinical details.
Exclusion criteria: Other variants of OSCC, metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of oral cavity and surgical specimen after chemotherapy and radiotherapy were excluded.
A total of 70 cases were collected, among them only primary tumours of OSCC confirmed by biopsy and located in any area of oral cavity were included. From the selected cases, slides with proper tumour center and periphery were segregated among metastatic and non metastatic cases.
In this pilot study, 10 cases of non metastatic and 10 metastatic OSCC cases were studied, in each case two samples were collected i.e., one from the tumour center and one from the tumour periphery. Hence, a total number of 40 samples with sufficient tumour periphery were included in this study.
Sample size calculation: Sample size estimation was done using the following formula
(Z)2×Std Dev×(1-Std Dev)/(Margin of error)2
The sample size was calculated assuming at the most 5% risk, with minimum 80% power and 5% significance level (significant at 95% confidence level. i.e., Z=1.96) and standard deviation of 0.5 and a margin of error (confidence interval).
Necessary sample size=(1.96)2×(0.5)×(1-0.5)/(0.10)2=40 Sample.
Hence, a total number of 40 samples with sufficient tumour periphery were included in this study.
The Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained sections were graded by Broder’s (9) and Anneroth’s Multifactorial grading system. According to Broder’s system the gradings were - well differentiated, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated while that based on Anneroth’s grading were: grade I: score of 6-12, grade II: score of 13-16 and grade III: score of 19-24 (6). The clinical staging of the tumour was done based on TNM staging system (10).
Statistical Analysis
The data was compiled in Microsoft Excel sheet and transferred to Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 20.0. Both descriptive and inferential statistics have been applied. Chi-square test and Spearman’s corelation coefficient test was used. The cut-off p-value was less than 0.05.
Results
Both the grading system showed a significant cellular difference in both tumour center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic OSCC. Comparatively, Anneroth’s multifactorial grading system showed highly significant p-value of 0.007 and 0.001 in tumour center and periphery of non metastatic and metastatic tumours respectively (Table/Fig 1), (Table/Fig 2) (Table/Fig 3) (Table/Fig 4). Among the six parameters of Anneorth’s, pattern of invasion showed a significant difference in the periphery of metastatic OSCC with a significant p-value=0.01, respectively (Table/Fig 5).
Among the 20 cases, 7 cases (35%) were of T2 category, 7 (35%) cases were of T3 category and 6 cases (30%) were of T4 category. Only 12.5% of cases were palpable among T2 category, in T3-71% of cases were palpable and in T4-100% of cases were palpable. Histopathologically, nodal positivity was observed in 10 (50%) cases. Statistically, no significant relationship existed between T factors and lymph node metastasis. The relationship between the Anneroth’s grading system and TNM staging for non metastatic and metastatic cases are tabulated in (Table/Fig 6), (Table/Fig 7), respectively. When comparing the association between metastatic and non metastatic groups with TNM staging, metastatic cases of OSCC showed a significant result with p-value=0.001.
Spearman correlation coefficient was done to analyse the correlation between the Anneroth’s system and TNM staging. A positive correlation was observed with increased in TNM staging with increased histopathological grading (Table/Fig 8). Comparatively, Anneroth’s grading system showed a significant correlation with TNM staging both in tumour center and periphery with a p-value=0.001 (Table/Fig 9).
Discussion
In head and neck tumours, 90% of cases were OSCC whose unabatable growth and invasive potential increases the locoregional spread (9),(11). Metastasis to lymph nodes signify the next stage in the progression of cancer. TNM staging is a prognostic factor to determine the extent of the diseases and to predict the outcome of cancer patients (12). However, rate of growth and invasiveness depends not only on the clinical staging, mostly on differences in the degree of differentiation of tumour cells which contributes to the heterogenous population (13),(14). Histological prognostic factors are important in assessing the clinical and biological behaviour of the tumour. In 1920, Broder’s quantitative grading system for cancer was initiated still it lacked a correlation with prognosis. To make the morphologic and histologic criteria to be more precise Anneroth and Hansen modified the histopathological grading system for application to OSCC.
In this study, tumour center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic tumours were graded by the Anneroth’s and Broder’s grading system to know the difference in the cellular details and invasiveness of the tumour. Comparatively, Anneroth’s system showed significant cellular difference in tumour periphery of metastatic OSCC with increased potential to regional LN metastasis.
Baba AI and Câtoi C found that there are cellular differences between tumour center and periphery, where the cell population in tumour center has normal intercellular connections, with desmosomes and junctional complexes, while these are absent or reduced at the periphery (15). Sharma M et al., stated that areas with a high invasive rhythm shows cells that are completely detached from the tumour mass, and whose interconnections disappear altogether (16). Bankfalvi A and Piffko J and Tumuluri V et al., reported that the tumour population in the invasive front determines the actual behaviour of the tumour, which provides information for assessing the clinical aggressiveness and thereby the prognosis of the tumour (17),(18). It is also stated that the tumour cells in the invasive front were in less differentiated state when compared the differentiated cell population in the center. Tumuluri V et al., and Byers RM et al., reported that cell population in the invasive tumour front has an affirmative correlation between the multifactorial histopathological grading system, prognosis and risk factors in OSCC (19),(20).
In Anneroth’s classification, the total scoring of the six parameters gives an idea about the extension, involvement and aggressiveness of the tumour. Though, Broder’s system exhibits a significant relationship between the tumour center and periphery, it is based only on one parameter i.e., degree differentiation of a cell. In this study, Anneroth’s grading showed highly significant results in both center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic OSCC. Similar findings were observed in the study conducted by Akhter M et al., where both the grading system showed significant results but Anneroth’s grading system was more significant when compared to Broder’s grading system (7).
Okada Y et al., and Dantas DD et al., observed no significant difference between and the nodal positivity and the T factors (21),(22). Study also reported a positive relationship between the Anneroth’s grading system and cervical node metastasis and postulated that the histopathological findings could serve as a predictor in cervical lymph node metastasis. In addition, Haque MA et al., also reported a significant relation between the multifactorial grading system and palpable lymph nodes (23). The present study differs from the above investigations by analysing the cellular changes in both tumour center and periphery of metastatic and non metastatic OSCC. The results also favour to predict, higher the alteration in tumour cell population in periphery of the tumour higher is the possibility of metastasis to regional lymph node.
Limitation(s)
It includes that only one area of the tumour was analysed for periphery. The mean score calculated from two or more periphery of whole tumour may represent the accurate biological behaviour of the tumour and can be used to assess early metastasis.
Conclusion
Anneroth’s multifactorial grading system of OSCC can be taken as a valuable diagnostic and predictive tool for assessing regional lymph node metastasis. This was a retrospective study and in future a prospective study with a larger sample size has to be carried for confirming the above results. For further improving the clinical value of the histological grading system, use of proliferative and vascular immunohistochemical markers can be accounted to predict the biological behaviour of the tumour.
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to thank Dr C Bharath, Assistant Professor of Department of Community Dentistry and Dr Balamanikandan, Associate Professor of Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery for their expert advice, support and valuable suggestions while conducting this study.
Reference
| 1. | Borse V, Konwar AN, Buragohain P. Oral cancer diagnosis and perspectives in India. Sensors International. 2020;2020:100046.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 2. | Salehiniya H, Raei M. Oral cavity and lip cancer in the world: An epidemiological review. Biomedical Research and Therapy. 2020;7(8):3898-905.
[ CrossRef] | 3. | Jadhav KB, Gupta N. Clinicopathological prognostic implicators of oral squamous cell carcinoma: Need to understand and revise. N Am J Med Sci. 2013;5(12):671-79.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 4. | Büntzel J, Hornig A, Glatzel M, Micke O, Bruns F, Schäfer U, Fröhlich D. Tumour markers and lymphatic metastasis in head and neck cancer patients. Anticancer Research. 2005;25(3A):1539-42.
| 5. | Dissanayake U. Malignancy grading of invasive fronts of oral squamous cell carcinomas: Correlation with overall survival. Translational Research in Oral Oncology. 2017;2:01-08.
[ CrossRef] | 6. | Jagtap MM, Shukla S, Acharya S, Tamhane A, Bhake A. Utility of histochemical and immunohistochemical profile in grading of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. J Clin Diagn Res. 2020;14(1):01-05.
[ CrossRef] | 7. | Akhter M, Hossain S, Rahman QB, Molla MR. A study on histological grading of oral squamous cell carcinoma and its co-relationship with regional metastasis. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2011;15(2):168.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 8. | Nguyen L, Fifis T, Malcontenti-Wilson C, Chan LS, Costa PN, Nikfarjam M, et al. Spatial morphological and molecular differences within solid tumours may contribute to the failure of vascular disruptive agent treatments. BMC Cancer. 2012;12(1):01-03.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 9. | Bhargava A, Saigal S, Chalishazar M. Histopathological grading systems in oral squamous cell carcinoma: A review. J Int Oral Health. 2010;2(4):01-00.
| 10. | Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: The 7 th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2010;17(6):1471-74.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 11. | Acharya S, Kumari N, Srivastava P, Arnold D, Nikhil K. Architectural changes in the regional lymph nodes of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2019;23(2):305.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 12. | Gospodarowicz MK, Miller D, Groome PA, Greene FL, Logan PA, Sobin LH. The process for continuous improvement of the TNM classification. Cancer: Interdisciplinary International Journal of the American Cancer Society. 2004;100(1):01-05.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 13. | Wittekind C, Compton CC, Greene FL, Sobin LH. TNM residual tumour classification revisited. Cancer. 2002;94(9):2511-17.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 14. | Rahima B, Shingaki S, Nagata M, Saito C. Prognostic significance of perineural invasion in oral and oropharyngeal carcinoma. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2004;97(4):423-31.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 15. | Baba AI, Câtoi C. Comparative oncology. Bucharest: Publishing House of the Romanian Academy; 2007.
| 16. | Sharma M, Sah P, Sharma SS, Radhakrishnan R. Molecular changes in invasive front of oral cancer. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. 2013;17(2):240.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 17. | Bankfalvi A, Piffko J. Prognostic and predictive factors in oral cancer: The role of the invasive tumour front. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2000;29(7):291-98.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 18. | Tumuluri V, Thomas GA, Fraser IS. Analysis of the Ki-67 antigen at the invasive tumour front of human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2002;31(10):598-604.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 19. | Tumuluri V, Thomas GA, Fraser IS. The relationship of proliferating cell density at the invasive tumour front with prognostic and risk factors in human oral squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine. 2004;33(4):204-08.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 20. | Byers RM, El-Naggar AK, Lee YY, Rao B, Fornage B, Terry NH, et al. Can we detect or predict the presence of occult nodal metastases in patients with squamous carcinoma of the oral tongue? Head and Neck: Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. 1998;20(2):138-44.
[ CrossRef] | 21. | Okada Y, Mataga I, Katagiri M, Ishii K. An analysis of cervical lymph nodes metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Relationship between grade of histopathological malignancy and lymph nodes metastasis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2003;32(3):284-88.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 22. | Dantas DD, Ramos CC, Costa AD, Souza LB, Pinto LP. Clinical-pathological parameters in squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2003;14(1):22-25.
[ CrossRef] [ PubMed] | 23. | Haque MA, Goswami UK, Rahman MM, Islam MW, Morshed MM, Islam MR, et al. Association of Anneroth’s Scoring and frequency of cervical lymph node metastasis among primary oral squamous cell carcinoma patients. Journal of Current and Advance Medical Research. 2019;6(2):69-72. [ CrossRef] |
10.7860/JCDR/2021/49249.15223
Date of Submission: Mar 03, 2021
Date of Peer Review: May 10, 2021
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2021
Date of Publishing: Aug 01, 2021
AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? Yes
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA
PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Jun 29, 2021
• Manual Googling: Jul 05, 2021
• iThenticate Software: Jul 17, 2021 (14%)
ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin
|