Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 662869

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : ZD04 - ZD07 Full Version

Management of Complex Zygomaticomaxillary Fracture with Frontal and Orbital Wall Involvement Associated with a Crushed Globe: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/87816.24378
Krishna Balaji Pampatwar, Bhushan Mundada, Nitin Bhola

1. Junior Resident, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India. 3. Professor, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, Maharashtra, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Krishna Balaji Pampatwar,
Junior Resident, Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha-442004, Maharashtra, India.
E-mail: krishnapampatwar308@gmail.com

Abstract

Zygomaticomaxillary Complex (ZMC) fractures are among the most common midfacial injuries and are frequently caused by high-velocity trauma, particularly road traffic accidents. These fractures frequently affect nearby structures including the orbit, maxilla, and frontal bone, leading to serious problems with function, appearance, and vision. To restore orbital integrity, facial symmetry, and functional outcomes, prompt diagnosis and appropriate surgical intervention are essential. A 17-year-old male presented with severe facial trauma following a road traffic accident. Significant facial asymmetry, periorbital oedema, flattening of the right malar prominence, limited jaw opening, and total loss of vision in the right eye were found during the clinical examination. An ophthalmological examination revealed a crushed globe that could not be saved. A complicated right-sided ZMC fracture involving the orbital floor, lateral orbital wall, maxillary sinus walls, along with frontal bone was identified on Computed Tomography (CT) imaging of the facial bones. Significant orbital damage and fracture fragment displacement were observed. Under general anaesthesia, the patient underwent a surgical procedure. Titanium miniplates and screws were used for open reduction and internal fixation of the frontal and zygomaticomaxillary bone fractures. In order to prevent enophthalmos and restore orbital support, titanium mesh was used for orbital floor repair. Because of the permanent ocular lesion, the injured globe was eviscerated. The face contour was well restored, the mouth opening was better, the occlusion was stable, with wounds healing appropriately. The postoperative recovery was uncomplicated. In order to manage difficult midfacial fractures for the best possible functional and cosmetic rehabilitation, this case highlights the significance of thorough clinical examination, radiographic assessment, and a multidisciplinary approach.

Keywords

Facial asymmetry, Frontal bone fracture, Maxillofacial trauma, Open reduction and internal fixation, Orbital wall fracture

Case Report

A 17-year-old male patient accompanied by parents, presented to the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery with complaints of pain, facial asymmetry on the right side of the face, restricted mouth opening, and loss of vision in the right eye for approximately one month following a road traffic accident. The injury occurred due to a collision between a two-wheeler and a tractor. Immediately after the accident, the patient experienced brief loss of consciousness and was taken to a tertiary care trauma centre for emergency management. On initial evaluation, the patient was conscious and oriented with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 14 (E4V4M6) and stable vital parameters. Primary trauma assessment was performed according to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols. Emergency management included wound debridement, primary suturing of lacerations in the right periorbital region, administration of intravenous fluids, analgesics, antibiotics, and tetanus prophylaxis.

During the initial hospital stay, an ophthalmology consultation was obtained. The right eye had No Perception of Light (NPL), according to an ophthalmologic examination. The diagnosis of a crushed globe injury was supported by the clinical findings, which included significant periorbital oedema, ecchymosis, subconjunctival haemorrhage, globe rupture, and protrusion of intraocular contents. Following the stabilisation of related facial injuries, definitive ophthalmic surgery was scheduled since the globe was considered non-salvageable. Before being referred for final maxillofacial treatment, the patient was treated conservatively during the acute phase to allow for the decrease of face oedema and the stabilisation of the systemic condition.

The patient visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery after about a month for definitive treatment of the functional restriction and chronic facial deformity. The patient was found to be alert, oriented, and haemodynamically stable upon general assessment. An extraoral examination showed facial asymmetry caused by a flattening of the cheek contour and a depression over the right malar prominence (Table/Fig 1).

The right supraorbital and infraorbital areas have healed sutured laceration scars. Ecchymosis and some residual periorbital oedema were also seen. In addition to palpable crepitus and step deformity throughout the ZMC, palpation indicated discomfort over the right zygomatic region, infraorbital rim, and supraorbital area.

Examination of the temporomandibular joint showed no clicking, deviation, or soreness in the preauricular area, and bilateral motions were smooth, synchronous, and painless. However, rather than intrinsic temporomandibular joint restriction, mouth opening was limited to approximately 25 mm due to mechanical impingement of the displaced zygomatic arch on the coronoid process (Table/Fig 2). An intraoral examination revealed stable bilateral occlusion and no signs of mandibular fracture or intersegmental movement. The intraoral soft-tissues, including the oral mucosa, were within normal limits.

A definitive surgical procedure was then scheduled after radiological assessment revealed severe right-sided ZMC fractures with related orbital and frontal bone involvement. As the patient was a minor, written informed consent for treatment and publication of clinical details and images was obtained from the patient’s parents/legal guardian.

Investigations

The right ZMC, right supraorbital rim, frontal bone, and orbital walls were fractured, and the right eye globe was crushed, as demonstrated by CT of the facial bones of the facial bones. Significant displacement of broken segments including the zygomatic body, orbital floor, lateral orbital wall, and frontozygomatic area was verified by axial, coronal, sagittal, and three-dimensional reconstructed images (Table/Fig 3)a-c. The injury was categorised as a Type C fracture, which denotes a complicated zygomatic fracture including the zygomatic body and accompanying damage of neighbouring orbital and facial skeletal structures, according to Zingg’s classification of zygomatic fractures (1). A definitive diagnosis of right-sided Zingg Type C ZMC fracture with accompanying frontal bone fracture, orbital wall fractures, as well as crushed globe of the right eye was made based on clinical and radiographic evidence.

Therapeutic Intervention

The patient was scheduled to have surgery while under general anaesthesia. Following a typical preoperative assessment and determining surgical fitness, intravenous propofol (2 mg/kg) and fentanyl (2 μg/kg) were used to produce general anaesthesia. Vecuronium (0.1 mg/kg) was then used to relax muscles in order to permit endotracheal intubation. For sufficient surgical access to the face skeleton, nasotracheal intubation was carried out. Oxygen, nitrous oxide, sevoflurane, and sporadic muscle relaxants were used to maintain anaesthesia while vital signs were continuously monitored. The right eye was then eviscerated and the right ZMC, frontal bone, and orbital wall fractures were openly reduced and internally fixed (Table/Fig 4).

In order to properly expose the ZMC, orbital rim, orbital floor, and frontal bone fractures, surgical access was obtained by combining a right maxillary vestibular incision, right subciliary/infraorbital incision, and right hemicoronal approach. Following exposure, the malunited fracture fragments were mobilised by releasing the surrounding fibrous tissue and early callus formation at the fracture sites. The ZMC was reduced anatomically, and the orbital framework and facial buttresses were restored using multiple fixation points. A four-hole 1.5 mm titanium miniplate with screws was used to stabilise the frontozygomatic suture area; a four-hole 2.0 mm titanium miniplate was used to fix the zygomaticomaxillary buttress; and a 1.5 mm titanium miniplate was used to support the infraorbital rim. A 1.5 mm titanium miniplate device was used to minimise and repair the frontal bone fracture (Table/Fig 5)a-f.

The surgical site was thoroughly irrigated to achieve haemostasis, and closure was performed in layers. Following uneventful extubation, the patient was shifted to the surgical critical care unit for close postoperative monitoring. Intravenous ceftriaxone 1g twice daily and metronidazole 500 mg three times daily were administered for infection prophylaxis. Pain management included intravenous paracetamol 1g every 8 hours and tramadol 50 mg as required. To lessen postoperative oedema, 8mg of intravenous dexamethasone was administered twice a day for 48 hours. Antiemetics and proton pump inhibitors were recommended as supportive treatments. Topical antibiotic eye ointment was administered to the operated socket following evisceration, and routine sterile dressing changes were carried out after an ophthalmologist consultation.

The patient was maintained on Nothing By Mouth (NPO) for the initial six hours postoperatively, followed by clear liquids once fully conscious. A soft/liquid diet was advised for two weeks to minimise stress on the facial bones and fixation sites. The patient was instructed to avoid chewing hard foods, wide mouth opening, and excessive jaw movements during the healing period. Adequate hydration and nutritional supplementation were encouraged.

After orbital repair and evisceration, some eye precautions were recommended. The patient was advised to maintain good eye dressing cleanliness, refrain from sleeping on the afflicted side, and not massage or put pressure on the operated eye. For at least four to six weeks, activities that might raise orbital pressure were prohibited, including nasal blowing, sneezing with a closed mouth, heavy lifting, leaning forward, and vigorous physical activity. For wound assessment, prosthetic eye planning, and healing process monitoring, routine follow-up with the ophthalmologist and maxillofacial surgery teams was recommended. On the second postoperative day, a postoperative CT scan verified adequate fracture reduction, stable fixation, and correct orbital mesh installation.

Follow-up and Outcomes

A postoperative CT scan was obtained on the second postoperative day to evaluate fracture reduction, fixation stability, and orbital reconstruction, which confirmed satisfactory alignment of the fractured segments and appropriate placement of the titanium plates and orbital mesh (Table/Fig 6)a-d.

During the early postoperative phase, occlusion remained steady and facial symmetry was restored. Following surgery, the patient was routinely monitored on postoperative days 7, 15, one month, three months, and six months. Mouth opening improved from 25 mm preoperatively to 38 mm at the 1-month follow-up and to 42 mm at the 3-month follow-up, demonstrating a notable functional recovery. Additionally, the patient showed acceptable facial aesthetics, improved facial shape, and adequate malar projection. During the follow-up period, there were no indications of neurosensory deficiencies, plate exposure, wound dehiscence, malocclusion, or surgical site infection.

On the second postoperative day, a postoperative CT scan verified stable fixation, appropriate orbital mesh placement, and good reduction of fracture segments. Clinical follow-up photos from later visits showed functional improvement and preserved face symmetry.The ophthalmology team conducted evisceration of the non-salvageable right eye during the same surgical procedure because of the crushed globe injury. The patient was recommended for ocular prosthetic rehabilitation after the socket had sufficiently healed over a period of around six to eight weeks. To enhance both psychological rehabilitation and aesthetic attractiveness, a customised ocular prosthesis was designed and then placed (Table/Fig 7).

Discussion

Among the most common midfacial fractures, ZMC fractures are usually caused by traffic accidents, especially in developing nations like India where two-wheeler accidents greatly increase the incidence of facial injuries (2). Road traffic accidents are the leading cause of maxillofacial fractures in India, according to recent epidemiological studies, with ZMC fractures accounting for a significant percentage of these injuries (3). The simultaneous occurrence of a complicated ZMC fracture linked to frontal bone fracture, orbital wall rupture, and crushed globe damage, which is uncommon in the literature, particularly in teenage patients, makes the current case unusual (4). Most previously published reports describe orbital fractures or isolated ZMC fractures that did not require evisceration, as the globe injury was not irreparable (1).

The necessity of a collaborative strategy combining ophthalmologists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons for the concurrent treatment of skeletal and ocular injuries is the therapeutic importance of this case. Due to early fibrosis along with malunion at the fracture site, which made anatomical reduction more challenging, this patient’s delayed presentation after one month posed a significant surgical difficulty (5). Furthermore, severe comminution and the requirement to restore orbital volume following globe loss made orbital floor restoration difficult. Functional rehabilitation was made more difficult by the limited mouth opening brought on by zygomatic arch impingement on the coronoid process.

For the treatment of ZMC fractures, a number of methods have been described, such as computer-assisted patient-specific implants for complex orbital reconstruction, open reduction with internal fixation using miniplates, transcutaneous reduction techniques, Keen’s intraoral approach, and closed reduction using Gillies temporal approach (6),(7),(8),(9). Autogenous bone grafts, porous polyethylene implants, resorbable plates, as well as titanium mesh have all been utilised in orbital floor defect instances (10). Because of its strength, contour flexibility, and consistent orbital support, titanium mesh was chosen in this instance.

In a study by Rothweiler R et al., satisfactory results were achieved with open reduction and rigid fixation in displaced ZMC fractures; however, those with orbital involvement showed chronic ocular problems (11). Kambalimath DH et al., reported successful management of zygomatic complex fractures using open reduction and internal fixation techniques, with most patients achieving satisfactory functional and aesthetic outcomes despite associated facial injuries (12). In a similar situation, Dubois L et al., reported successful cosmetic results from orbital repair using titanium mesh in cases with complicated orbital injuries (13). The current case was clinically unique since it needed simultaneous fracture repair, orbital reconstruction, and evisceration of a non-salvageable right globe in the setting of delayed presentation.

In order to achieve the best functional and aesthetic results in complex craniofacial trauma cases, prompt diagnosis, careful surgical planning, and multidisciplinary management are crucial. This is demonstrated by the successful restoration of facial symmetry, improved mouth opening, stable occlusion, and subsequent ocular prosthetic rehabilitation.

Conclusion

Severe ZMC fractures associated with orbital and frontal bone involvement require prompt diagnosis and multidisciplinary surgical management. Accurate reduction, rigid fixation, and appropriate orbital reconstruction are essential to restore facial form and function. This case highlights the importance of comprehensive clinical and radiological assessment and a structured surgical approach in managing complex maxillofacial trauma.

References

1.
Zingg M, Laedrach K, Chen J, Chowdhury K, Vuillemin T, Sutter F, et al. Classification and treatment of zygomatic fractures: A review of 1,025 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50(8):778-90.[crossref] [PubMed]
2.
Gupta A, Lehl G, Awana M. Epidemiological study of maxillofacial injuries in a tertiary care hospital in India. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;44(1):e219. Available from: https://www.ijoms.com/article/S0901-5027(15)00401-4/abstract.[crossref]
3.
Gurung US, Singh G, Mishra M, Mondal S, Gaur A. Maxillofacial injuries related to road traffic accidents: A five year multicenter analysis. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2019;3:e61-e66.[crossref]
4.
Boffano P, Roccia F, Zavattero E, Dediol E, Uglešic´ V, Kovac? ic? Ž, et al. European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) project: A multicentre and prospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43(1):62-70. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2014.10.011.[crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Fonseca RJ, Barber HD, Powers MP, Frost DE. Oral and Maxillofacial Trauma. 4th ed. St Louis: Elsevier Saunders; 2013. p. 547-590.
6.
Committeri U, Arena A, Carraturo E, Austoni M, Germano C, Salzano G, et al. Incidence of orbital side effects in zygomaticomaxillary complex and isolated orbital walls fractures: A retrospective study in south Italy and a brief review of the literature. J Clin Med. 2023;12(3):845. Doi: 10.3390/jcm12030845.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Wang HD, Dillon J. Contemporary management of zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures. Semin Plast Surg. 2021;35(4):256-62. Doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735812.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Hwang K, You SH. Analysis of facial bone fractures: An 11-year study of 2,094 patients. Indian J Plast Surg. 2010;43(1):42-48.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Grob S, Yonkers M, Tao J. Orbital fracture repair. Semin Plast Surg. 2017;31(1):31-39.[crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Sai Krishna D, Soumadip D. Reconstruction of orbital floor fractures with porous polyethylene implants: A prospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2016;15(3):300-07. Doi: 10.1007/s12663-015-0840-z.[crossref] [PubMed]
11.
Rothweiler R, Bayer J, Zwingmann J, Suedkamp NP, Kalbhenn J, Schmelzeisen R, et al. Outcome and complications after treatment of facial fractures at different times in polytrauma patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2018;46(2):283-87.[crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Kambalimath DH, Kambalimath HV, Satyanarayan MVV, Ashok Kumar V, Ravikumar TG, Deepak RM. Retrospective analysis of management of zygomatic complex fractures. Traumaxilla. 2023;5(1-3):20-26. Doi: 10.1177/26323273231172739.[crossref]
13.
Dubois L, Steenen SA, Gooris PJ, Bos RR, Becking AG. Controversies in orbital reconstruction-III. Biomaterials for orbital reconstruction: A review with clinical recommendations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;45(1):41-50.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/87816.24378

Date of Submission: Jan 29, 2026
Date of Peer Review: Apr 01, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 17, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

Author declaration:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Feb 12, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 13, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 15, 2026 (4%)


ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com