Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 1229117

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case report
Year : 2026 | Month : September | Volume : 20 | Issue : 9 | Page : VD05 - VD07 Full Version

Low-dose Mirtazapine Induced Hyponatraemia with Probable Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion in an Elderly Male: A Case Report


Published: September 1, 2026 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2026/89067.24420
V Akshai, Suvarna Jyothi Kantipudi, Akkash Kumar Ravichandran, Chamelee Anbu, Sushma Viswanathan

1. Junior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 2. Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 3. Senior Resident, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 4. Assistant Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. 5. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Correspondence Address :
Suvarna Jyothi Kantipudi,
Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Sri Ramachandra Medical College and Research Institute, Porur, Chennai-600116, Tamil Nadu, India.
E-mail: suvarna@sriramachandra.edu.in

Abstract

Hyponatraemia is a common and potentially serious condition in elderly patients. It is associated with significant morbidity including delirium, falls and prolonged hospitalisation. Antidepressant induced hyponatraemia is a recognised adverse effect, most commonly attributed to Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone Secretion (SIADH). Although Mirtazapine is often considered a safer alternative to other antidepressant-induced hyponatraemia, reports of SIADH related to its use remain limited. We report the case of a 72-year-old male with dementia and Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) who developed symptomatic hyponatraemia 15 days after initiation of mirtazapine (3.75 mg/day). Evaluation revealed hypotonic hyponatraemia with a serum sodium level of 122 mEq/L, serum osmolality of 253 mOsm/kg, urine spot sodium of 31.1 mEq/L and clinical euvolaemia. Alternative causes of hyponatraemia and SIADH including adrenal insufficiency, hypothyroidism, renal dysfunction, cardiac failure, malignancy, respiratory disease, HIV infection and acute intracranial pathology were excluded. Mirtazapine was stopped while concomitant medications were continued unchanged along with fluid restriction and high-salt diet which resulted in improvement of serum sodium levels and resolution of hyponatraemia associated delirium within three days. The likelihood of Mirtazapine use causing hyponatraemia was probable (score 7) as per the Naranjo Adverse drug reaction probability scale. This case describes probable mirtazapine-associated SIADH occurring at a low dose of 3.75 mg/day in an elderly male and highlights the importance of baseline evaluation and regular monitoring of serum sodium along with vigilance for clinical signs of hyponatraemia in elderly patients and those with risk factors receiving mirtazapine although mirtazapine is considered a safer alternative for other antidepressant-induced hyponatraemia.

Keywords

Aged, Antidepressive agents, Drug-related side-effects and adverse reactions, Geriatric psychiatry, Water-electrolyte imbalance

Case Report

A 72-year-old male from a middle socioeconomic background residing in a semi-urban area, with good social support presented to the psychiatry outpatient department with worsening Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia (BPSD) with low mood and sleep disturbances over the past two weeks. The patient was a known case of dementia with BPSD for two years. In view of worsening BPSD the patient was admitted in the psychiatry ward requiring symptomatic management and a plan was made to initiate cognitive stimulation therapy and behavioural management. The patient is on treatment with Memantine 5 mg once a day for dementia with BPSD. The patient had previously been diagnosed with F03 (unspecified dementia) and F06.8 (other specified mental disorders due to brain disease), according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) (1). The patient had type 2 diabetes mellitus, for which he was receiving metformin 500 mg once daily; systemic hypertension, treated with amlodipine 5 mg once daily; coronary artery disease, managed with clopidogrel 75 mg/atorvastatin 10 mg once daily at bedtime; and Parkinson’s disease, treated with a fixed-dose combination of levodopa 100 mg and carbidopa 25 mg twice daily. The patient was on regular treatment for all the above mentioned medical conditions. During admission, mirtazapine was initiated at a dose of 3.75 mg/day to address low mood and sleep disturbances.

The patient was moderately built. Baseline serum sodium prior to initiation of mirtazapine was 134 mEq/L. After 15 days of mirtazapine use, the patient developed acute onset confusion and restlessness with fluctuating sensorium. Assessment using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) confirmed the presence of delirium (2). Laboratory investigations revealed serum sodium 122 mEq/L, blood urea nitrogen 8 mg/dL and serum creatinine 0.6 mg/dL. Spot urine sodium was 31.1 mEq/L, serum osmolality was 253 mOsm/kg, and serum uric acid was 2.5 mg/dL. Random blood sugar, serum cortisol, thyroid function tests, liver function tests and complete blood count were within normal limits. Two-dimensional echocardiography and chest radiography revealed no significant abnormalities. Clinically, the patient was euvolaemic, with no signs of dehydration, normal peripheral pulses, normal pulse rate and blood pressure and normal skin turgor. The patient was not receiving any antidepressants prior to admission and was not on diuretics or any other medications known to cause hyponatraemia. MRI brain showed diffuse cerebral cortical atrophy with no evidence of acute infarction, intracranial haemorrhage, space occupying lesions or other acute intracranial pathology thereby excluding an acute structural intracranial cause of delirium. No other causes of hyponatraemia or Syndrome of Inappropriate Antidiuretic Hormone secretion (SIADH) including tumours, respiratory system disease or HIV infection were identified. Mirtazapine was discontinued. The patient had hypotonic hyponatraemia with serum sodium of 122 mEq/L, serum osmolality of 253 mOsm/kg with clinical euvolaemia, elevated urinary sodium levels of 31.1 mEq/L, and normal thyroid, cardiac and adrenal function, findings consistent with the diagnostic framework proposed by Schwartz and Bartter for SIADH (3). Alternative causes of hyponatraemia including adrenal insufficiency, hypothyroidism, renal dysfunction, cardiac failure, tumours, respiratory disease, HIV infection and acute intracranial pathology were evaluated and excluded as detailed above and a clear temporal relationship was observed between the initiation of mirtazapine and the onset of hyponatraemia. The patient was advised fluid restriction and a high-salt diet. After three days of discontinuing mirtazapine, the confusion and restlessness has resolved without the need for additional correction and serum sodium has improved to 133 mEq/L.

Discussion

Hyponatraemia is one of the most common fluid and electrolyte imbalances in hospitalised patients and occurs more frequently among the elderly (4). It is a potentially serious condition especially in elderly patients when presenting with delirium. A systematic review has reported that mirtazapine induced hyponatraemia is relatively uncommon, with an incidence of 3.26%, most commonly attributed to SIADH (5).

The present case describes the development of probable mirtazapine-associated SIADH in a 72-year-old male with dementia and BPSD, manifesting as symptomatic hyponatraemia with a serum sodium nadir of 122 mEq/L within 15 days of initiating mirtazapine at a low dose of 3.75 mg/day. The likelihood of Mirtazapine use causing hyponatraemia in this case was probable (score 7) according to the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale (6).

As per the systematic review which included seven cases, the mean dose was 19.28 mg/day (7.5 mg-30 mg), however in the index case it was only 3.75 mg/day even though the mirtazapine induced hyponatraemia is dose independent (5). In the systematic review mentioned above , Ladino M et al., reported mirtazapine-associated hyponatraemia in a 72-year-old male receiving 7.5 mg/day, with a serum sodium nadir of 116 mEq/L occurring within six days of initiation (7), while Cheah CY et al., reported profound hyponatraemia in a 61-year-old male and a 79-year-old female receiving 15 mg/day and 30 mg/day, respectively, with serum sodium nadirs of 112 and 113 mEq/L occurring within seven and ten days of treatment initiation, notably, both these patients were receiving concomitant diuretic therapy, a recognised risk factor for hyponatraemia (8). Ghosh A et al., reported hyponatraemia in a 46-year-old female following an increase in mirtazapine dose from 15 mg/day to 22.5 mg/day (9). Compared with these reports, the present patient developed symptomatic hyponatraemia with a serum sodium nadir of 122 mEq/L at a very low dose of 3.75 mg/day making it clinically noteworthy (5). In the index case the hyponatraemia had occurred after 15 days of mirtazapine use like some studies where antidepressant induced hyponatraemia occurs within a month approximately (5),(10). According to a meta-analysis (11), mirtazapine has the lowest risk of hyponatraemia among antidepressants. Consequently, mirtazapine is often considered a safer alternative in patients with other antidepressant induced hyponatraemia (5),(11),(12),(13). Recognised risk factors like concomitant use of other hyponatraemia inducing medications (5),(8),(14), low body weight and renal dysfunction (15) were not present in the current case. Euvolaemic hyponatraemia may occur secondary to SIADH, adrenal insufficiency, hypothyroidism, primary polydipsia, low-solute intake states and drug-induced causes (16). Alternative causes of hyponatraemia were systematically considered. Adrenal insufficiency was considered unlikely in view of a normal 8 AM serum cortisol level, hypothyroidism was excluded by normal thyroid function tests and renal dysfunction was ruled out by normal renal function parameters. Clinical examination was consistent with euvolaemia and there were no clinical features suggestive of cardiac failure such as dyspnoea, orthopnoea or pedal oedema, nor was there echocardiographic evidence of cardiac failure. Medication-induced hyponatraemia due to the patient’s long-term comorbidity medications was considered less likely because these medications were continued unchanged, whereas mirtazapine was discontinued following which serum sodium levels improved and clinical symptoms resolved. Collectively, these findings support a probable diagnosis of mirtazapine associated SIADH.

Pharmacologically, mirtazapine acts through serotonin receptor blockade (5-HT2A and 5-HT3 receptors), histamine H1 receptor blockade, and alpha-2 adrenergic receptor blockade of both autoreceptors and heteroreceptors in serotonergic neurons, resulting in increased serotonergic and noradrenergic neurotransmission (17). The development of SIADH may be related to its serotonergic effects, however the exact mechanism of antidepressant induced SIADH remains unclear (10). In elderly psychiatric patients treated with SSRIs and SNRIs, female sex has been associated with an increased risk of hyponatraemia (18) and Drug-induced hyponatraemia has been reported more frequently in women (19). Consistent with these observations, females accounted for 71.4% of reported cases of mirtazapine-associated hyponatraemia in a systematic review albeit based on a limited number of cases (5). The occurrence of probable mirtazapine-associated SIADH in the present elderly male patient is therefore noteworthy.

The baseline serum sodium level of 134 mEq/L before mirtazapine initiation may have represented a predisposing factor (20), however preexisting chronic hyponatraemia could not be established from this patient’s available clinical information and the temporal association with mirtazapine initiation together with improvement following drug discontinuation supports mirtazapine as the likely precipitating factor.

Even though mirtazapine is commonly considered a safer alternative to other antidepressants induced hyponatraemia, baseline evaluation and regular follow-up monitoring of serum sodium levels along with vigilance of clinical signs of hyponatraemia should be performed, particularly in elderly patients and those with risk factors, especially during the first month after the initiation of mirtazapine. Continued clinical vigilance is also warranted as delayed presentations have been reported.

Conclusion

This case highlights the potential of mirtazapine to cause symptomatic hyponatraemia through a probable SIADH mechanism even at a low dose of 3.75 mg/day. Although the onset of hyponatraemia may vary from days to months after treatment initiation, baseline serum sodium assessment with periodic follow-up monitoring together vigilance for clinical signs of hyponatraemia is warranted throughout treatment particularly during the first month in elderly patients and those with risk factors.

References

1.
The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines [Internet]. [cited 2026 May 13]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9241544228.
2.
Miranda F, Gonzalez F, Plana MN, Zamora J, Quinn TJ, Seron P. Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) for the diagnosis of delirium in adults in critical care settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023;11(11):CD013126. Doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013126.pub2 PubMed PMID: 37987526; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10661047.[crossref] [PubMed]
3.
Yasir M, Mechanic OJ. Syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 [cited 2026 Feb 9]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507777/ PubMed PMID: 29939554.
4.
Lu H, Vollenweider P, Kissling S, Marques-Vidal P. Prevalence and description of hyponatremia in a swiss tertiary care hospital: An observational retrospective study. Front Med. 2020;7. Doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00512.[crossref] [PubMed]
5.
Moscona-Nissan A, López-Hernández JC, González-Morales AP. Mirtazapine risk of hyponatremia and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion in adult and elderly patients: A systematic review. Cureus. 2021;13(12):e20823. Doi: 10.7759/cureus.20823 PubMed PMID: 35141079; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8800172.[crossref]
6.
Naranjo CA, Busto U, Sellers EM, Sandor P, Ruiz I, Roberts EA, et al. A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1981;30(2):239-45. Doi: 10.1038/clpt.1981.154 PubMed PMID: 7249508.[crossref] [PubMed]
7.
Ladino M, Guardiola VD, Paniagua M. Mirtazapine-induced hyponatremia in an elderly hospice patient. J Palliat Med. 2006;9(2):258-60. Doi: 10.1089/ jpm.2006.9.258 PubMed PMID: 16629552.[crossref] [PubMed]
8.
Cheah CY, Ladhams B, Fegan PG. Mirtazapine associated with profound hyponatremia: Two case reports. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2008;6(2):91-95. Doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2008.04.001 PubMed PMID: 18675767.[crossref] [PubMed]
9.
Ghosh A, Hegde A, Grover S. Mirtazapine-associated hyponatremia presenting as delirium. Indian J Pharmacol. 2014;46(4):448. Doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.135964.[crossref] [PubMed]
10.
Liu BA, Mittmann N, Knowles SR, Shear NH. Hyponatremia and the syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone associated with the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: A review of spontaneous reports. CMAJ. 1996;155(5):519-27. PubMed PMID: 8804257; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1335030.
11.
Gheysens T, Van Den Eede F, De Picker L. The risk of antidepressant-induced hyponatremia: A meta-analysis of antidepressant classes and compounds. Eur Psychiatry. 2024;67(1):e20. Doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.11 PubMed PMID: 38403888; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10966618.[crossref] [PubMed]
12.
Jagsch C, Marksteiner J, Seiringer E, Windhager E. Successful mirtazapine treatment of an 81-year-old patient with syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2007;40(3):129-31. Doi: 10.1055/s- 2007-973837 PubMed PMID: 17541890.[crossref] [PubMed]
13.
Mogi T, Yoshino A, Ikemoto G, Nomura S. Mirtazapine as an alternative for selective-serotonin-reuptake-inhibitor-induced syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;66(1):80. Doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02297.x PubMed PMID: 22250614.[crossref] [PubMed]
14.
Famularo G, Gasbarrone L, De Virgilio A, Minisola G. Mirtazapine-associated hyponatremia in an elderly patient. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(6):1144-45. Doi: 10.1345/aph.1L724 PubMed PMID: 19435965.[crossref] [PubMed]
15.
Jacob S, Spinler SA. Hyponatremia associated with selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in older adults. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(9):1618-22. Doi: 10.1345/ aph.1G293 PubMed PMID: 16896026.[crossref] [PubMed]
16.
Rout P, Badireddy M. Hyponatremia. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2026 [cited 2026 Jun 3]. Available from: http://www. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470386/ PubMed PMID: 29262111.
17.
Lavergne F, Berlin I, Gamma A, Stassen H, Angst J. Onset of improvement and response to mirtazapine in depression: A multicenter naturalistic study of 4771 patients. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2005;1(1):59-68. Doi: 10.2147/ nedt.1.1.59.52296 PubMed PMID: 18568129; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2426820.[crossref] [PubMed]
18.
Giorlando F, Teister J, Dodd S, Udina M, Berk M. Hyponatraemia: An audit of aged psychiatry patients taking SSRIs and SNRIs. Curr Drug Saf. 2013;8(3):175- 80. Doi: 10.2174/15748863113089990036 PubMed PMID: 23841535.[crossref] [PubMed]
19.
Castellana E, Budau PM, Chiappetta MR. Women and hyponatremia: An analysis of sex differences in adverse drug reactions. Hosp Pharm. 2025;60(4):309-13. Doi: 10.1177/00185787251337618 PubMed PMID: 40376453; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC12075165.[crossref] [PubMed]
20.
Bissram M, Scott FD, Liu L, Rosner MH. Risk factors for symptomatic hyponatraemia: The role of pre-existing asymptomatic hyponatraemia. Intern Med J. 2007;37(3):149-55. Doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01294.x PubMed PMID: 17316332.[crossref] [PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2026/89067.24420

Date of Submission: Mar 16, 2026
Date of Peer Review: May 28, 2026
Date of Acceptance: Jul 06, 2026
Date of Publishing: Sep 01, 2026

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. Yes

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Apr 24, 2026
• Manual Googling: Jul 02, 2026
• iThenticate Software: Jul 04, 2026 (1%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 6

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com